The Smart Model again is shown to be more accurate than the QM Orbital Model



 Science > Physics > The Smart Model again is shown to be more accurate than the QM Orbital Model

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "S. Enterprize Company"
Date: 28 Jan 2006 12:31:42 AM
Object: The Smart Model again is shown to be more accurate than the QM Orbital Model
The Smart Model Again is shown to be more accurate than the QM Orbital
Model
"An electron is turned backwards by its collision deep within a proton
in this classic image from the ZEUS detector at the DESY laboratory in
Hamburg. ZEUS ...."
http://hepweb.rl.ac.uk/ppUKpics/POW/pr_971203.html
Notice that the electron can interact DEEP within the proton as has
been observed with experimental evidence. The QM model that has
developed the Periodic Table of Elements was based on electrons
existing in orbital shells. The Smart Model Periodic Table Of Elements
( proposed) would show that each element is an intelligent structural
design. I have shown this years ago even before they showed this with
x-ray holograms of various higher numbered elements. The Smart Model
theoretically predicted the various designs looks like cubic and
hexagonal spheres of various patterns and interacting shapes of protons
neutrons and the electrons.
Acknowledgements: I thank God and Jesus for showing me a few things
about their designed universe.
.

User: "S. Enterprize Company"

Title: Re: The Smart Model again is shown to be more accurate than the QM Orbital Model 28 Jan 2006 01:41:28 PM
According to Smart Model Conduction Theory ( another subject
related to this), an electron traveling through the proton's Helix
Spiral Field. If you want to you could say it travels through the
"Vortex" field of the proton, when there is a positive or negative
potential difference between conduction type atoms, like carbon, or
copper etc... .
Electricity doesn't flow on the outer edge of a wire through
electron orbital holes around a proton. They travel like this according
to the Smart Model Theory:
negative potential of battery
-- - - - - - - - - -
e
e
( e ) <---- proton helix
( e ) spiral field
( e )
((((((((((( e))))))))))) <-- Proton Neutral
( e ) Particle - Quark Zone
( e )
( e )
|
|
v
++++
positive potential of battery
When they collided an electron with a proton at high energy speeds
near the speed of light, basically the electron just passed through the
proton but because it was a collision, the electron broke apart
internal sub-particle parts of the proton, which includes the Quarks of
the proton.
The electron is also a Helix Spiral Field, but a smaller one like
this.
CW spinning side
( ) electron
( )
((()))
( )
( )
CCW spinning ( positron) side
This proton doesn't exist as an orbital around the proton in a shell
chaos field around it, the electron interacts with the proton with an
anti-neutrino neutral particle. Something like this,
P-n-e
A neutron when it decays breaks down into,
N ---> p + v~ + e-
A deuterium atom is the interaction of a proton with a neutron. It is
basically just slightly overlapping Helix Spiral Fields that remain
connected with a Strong Nuclear Force.
Again like I said years ago, I was the one that showed people the
basic internal and external structure of the atom and it's
sub-particles. Years ago everyone thought there was no such thing as an
internal structure for an atom or particle. But I discovered this. I
didn't get the credit for my work either. I was rejected because I
added religion to my work. Well I had to thank God and Jesus, who else
would help me in my life? And God and Jesus still helps me. So I will
always give them credit for their design of the universe from the micro
level to the macro level of the universe.
I'm not forcing religion on anyone. I am only saying that in my
personal life God and Jesus has helped me. I'm not saying you need to
be a Baptist, or a Moslum or a Hindu, but you show at least believe
there is someone else out their in the universe higher than a human
that designed this place. Like for example, look at the robotic details
of microscopic bugs under an electron microscope. There is details that
make this creatures look like advanced nano-robot creators that we
human are working on. Even bacteria under an electron microscope is
seen with a motorized propeller spinning tail for movement.
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Re: Communication Faster Than Light
Robots now better than humans at telling jokes.
Is there more to light than we see?
Democrats lost FAR more than the election . . .
Negative Gravity Less Than One Earth-G? Or Less Than Zero-G?
Is the coefficient of kinetic friction bigger than one?
Not falling faster than the speed of light in a black hole
Could the universe be older and bigger than we can see?
Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?
Black Holes As Initial Rather than Terminal Objects
Faster Than Light Quantum Signal Nonlocality?
JET MAY BE 10X FASTER THAN OTHER PLANES
USC May Be Better Than UCLA
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 63: If Subtraction is More Fundamental Than Integration vs Differentiation, Then What Happens to Functional Analysis?
"Is More Than One Quark Needed?"
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER