| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Skrow" |
| Date: |
01 Jan 2006 10:06:25 AM |
| Object: |
"The Source of Gravitational Energy" |
"The Source of Gravitational Energy"
When one applies the correct relativistic transformations to
the gravitational field, the source of gravitational energy becomes
apparent.
Unfortunately, due to a sophomoric error in the derivation of General
Relativity, it has become accepted that the relativistic transformations for
gravity are:
Force = 1
Length = 1
Time = 1/(1+$)
Where "1/(1+$)" is the time transformation as provided by
General Relativity (GTR).
Unfortunately, the error in its generation made the
mathematics impossible of solution within the constraints of three
dimensional
Euclidian Geometry and it took 18 months for a solution to be obtained. (The
18
months were not used up in solving the matrix equation, as current writings
would have you believe, they represented the length of time it took for Dr.
Einstein to adapt the geometry of Riemann (which is based upon the faulty
description of a straight line implicit in all current geometries but which
does
not effect Euclidean Geometry). In applying Riemannian Geometry , Dr.
Einstein
added the fiction of curved space and added the spurious degree of freedom
needed to solve his equations. This approach was accepted by a conference on
the
subject with the statement "why shouldn't we consider space to be curved, no
one
can prove it isn't. (Actually the proof is quite simple and is provided in
http:/einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm). The acceptance of curved space required
a
term for the curvature as a function of the gravitational field. Surprise
surprise, that curvature term turned out to be equal to the term for time.
When one applies the legitimate rules of measurement (as would
be required in any of the more mundane fields of Science) and accepted and
easily verified physical laws to the study of the gravitational field, one
finds
it possible to rigorously devise a different set of gravitational
transformations which do not require space to be curved:
Force = 1
Length = 1/(1-$)
Time = (1-$)
(The term "$" is identical with the equivalent term in General
Relativity).Testing these
transformations against observation reveals that they yield the same
conclusions
within the Solar Field and in comparison with observations of massive and/or
dense stars as does GTR to an accuracy well beyond experimental
capabilities.
There is one important difference, however. They reveal that the end result
of
gravitational collapse is not a singularity but is a stable object the size
of
its horizon radius. THEY ALSO REVEAL THE SOURCE OF GRAVITATIONAL ENERGY.
In an F(orce)-L(ength)-T(ime) system of units, the dimensional
content of energy is F*L. Since the gravitational transformation for length
is
unity, this means that the gravitational transformation for energy is equal
to
the gravitational transformation for Length and is therefore equal to
1/(1-$).
If we accept that the Principle of Relativity applies, the locally measured
mass
equivalent energy of an object must remain unchanged as it moves to a
different
elevation reference frame. In order to meet this requirement, the move to a
different elevation in the field the object must gain or lose energy in
terms of
the units of measurement for energy existing at its original location. To do
this, a force must result as it moves. The product of this force and the
distance of fall is the energy of fall.
If we apply this process to an object falling from a
quasi-infinite distance to the event horizon, we find that, in terms of the
units of measurement existing at the quasi-infinite radius, the
gravitational
transformation for energy requires shows that the object converts all of its
rest mass equivalent energy to kinetic energy. When it reaches the event
horizon
and its velocity equals the velocity of light, the original rest mass
equivalent
energy has become zero because it has been converted to kinetic energy (all
as
measured with the units of measurement existing at the quasi-infinite
radius).
In terms of the units of measurement existing at the event horizon however,
the
rest mass equivalent energy of the object is unchanged and the kinetic
energy is
infinite.
Since Relativity is all about observations made in systems
where the size of the units of measurement are affected by the elevation
and/or
velocity, Dimensional Analysis is required to deal rationally with the
process.
Despite this, I have received an E-mail from an individual who strongly
asserted
that Dimensional Analysis is of no benefit in the study of velocity and
gravitational effect. The frightening thing in this E-mail is that the
sender is
probably an academic busily damaging the minds of his students.
The source material for this posting may be found in
http://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm ("The Einstein Hoax" {1997});
http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm; ("Gravity" {1987}); and
http://einsteinhoax.com/relcor.htm ("Corrections to Special Relativity"
{1997}). EVERYTHING WHICH WE ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH
EVERYTHING ELSE WE HAVE ACCEPTED AS TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL
OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST BE MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT
ALWAYS MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF
WORKMANSHIP FROM THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.
All of the Newsposts made by this site may be viewed at
http://einsteinhoax.com/postinglog.htm.
Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on
a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy
as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts,
please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you
have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.
E-mail:-
The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 5
years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE
MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by
individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without
questioning it. If anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be
objectively answered, the material at the Website will be withdrawn.
Challenges to date have revealed only the responder's inadequacy with one
exception for which a correction was provided.
.
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy" |
01 Jan 2006 11:26:50 AM |
|
|
I'll beat you to it this time, Sam:
"You have just been awarded the "Mr./Ms. Boring Award" of 1926. Please
pick up your prize in Nome, Alaska."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "dedanoe" |
|
| Title: Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy" |
01 Jan 2006 04:13:24 PM |
|
|
There is no gravity you slimy piece of *****. ALL EVEN NOTHING IS
LEVER!!!
http://dedddanoe.tripod.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
