The Standard Model Blows


 Science > Physics > The Standard Model Blows

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1
 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Anonymous"
Date: 20 Jan 2004 01:54:27 PM
Object: The Standard Model Blows
thank the physacists for making chips
for computers. but there experteese
ends out of a block of silicone. there
model of the hole world is just
a stoopid silicone dream. there wave
partical dualaty explanation is
vibratons in crystals sometimes acting
like particals they call phonons.
they take the maths of crystels and
fool around, and what do you know now
the whole world a block of silicone,
with electromagnic waves are now
a "harmonic occilater" get it, a
vibration like in there silicone, and
there same magic maths that explained
the phonons in the silicone they pull
out and say that electromagnic waves is
this same math and thats why there are
photons. And then they play around with
the group math that workd so well in
there crystels, and suddenly they
have a model of the whole universe and
in there model everyone is weitless lol.
the nitwits. you cant make a whole
unaverse out of a block of silicone. get
out of that silicone lab and look around
at the real world and see the whole
unaverse isnt the math in a block of
silicone. duh. your silicone explanation
of maxwells and planks and einstines
mysterys is crap. your maths might be
good for silicone but otherwise
einstain was right it blows.
-=-
This message was posted via two or more anonymous remailing services.
.

User: "Franz Heymann"

Title: Re: The Standard Model Blows 20 Jan 2004 04:24:32 PM
"Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@Optonline.Net> wrote in message
news:R927DQU438006.6211458333@anonymous...

thank the physacists

physicists

for making chips
for computers. but there

their

experteese

expertise

ends out of a block of silicone.

silicon

there

their

model of the hole

whole

world is just
a stoopid

stupid

silicone

silicon

dream. there

their

wave
partical

particle

dualaty

duality

explanation is
vibratons

vibrations

in crystals sometimes acting
like particals

particles

they call phonons.
they take the maths of crystels

crystals

and
fool around, and what do you know now
the whole world a block of silicone,

silicon

with electromagnic waves are now
a "harmonic occilater"

oscillator

get it, a
vibration like in there

their

silicone,

silicon

and
there

their

same magic maths that explained
the phonons in the silicone

silicon

they pull
out and say that electromagnic waves is
this same math and thats why there are
photons. And then they play around with
the group math that workd so well in
there crystels,

crystals

and suddenly they
have a model of the whole universe and
in there model everyone is weitless

weightless

lol.
the nitwits. you cant

can't

make a whole
unaverse out of a block of silicone.

silicon

get
out of that silicone

silicon

lab and look around
at the real world and see the whole
unaverse

universe
isnt the math in a block of

silicone.

silicon
duh. your silicone explanation

of maxwells

Maxwell's

and planks

Planck's

and einstines

Einstein's

mysterys

mysteries

is crap. your maths might be
good for silicone

silicon

but otherwise
einstain

Einstein

was right it blows.

That was the ***** poorest example of the mangling of language that I have
seen in a long time.
Are you a product of the modern style of education in the USA?
And you know no physics to boot.
Franz
.
User: "Keith Stein"

Title: Re: The Standard Model Blows 20 Jan 2004 06:39:45 PM
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:buk9r0$lfq$1@titan.btinternet.com...


"Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@Optonline.Net> wrote in message
news:R927DQU438006.6211458333@anonymous...

thank the physacists

<snip>

was right it blows.


That was the ***** poorest example of the mangling of language that I have
seen in a long time.
Are you a product of the modern style of education in the USA?
And you know no physics to boot.

Franz

Just so Mr. Heymann. If the writter had known any physics then
she/he would surely know that the Standard Model "Sucks" eh!
keith stein
.

User: "Y.Porat"

Title: Re: The Standard Model Blows 21 Jan 2004 12:13:53 AM
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message news:<buk9r0$lfq$1@titan.btinternet.com>...

"Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@Optonline.Net> wrote in message
news:R927DQU438006.6211458333@anonymous...

thank the physacists


physicists

for making chips
for computers. but there


their

experteese


expertise

ends out of a block of silicone.


silicon

there


their

-------------
Frantz
the fact you stick to the wrong spelling means
you dont have much physical arguments to defend the standard Model
you cant obfuscate the fact that standard Model
has credited to itself much more than it realy deserves
not to mention its cheating parts
not all the chips achievenets belong to sm
most of it is to the big private laboratories including their
diligent Engineers that did the jobs
the great advance of technology is leaving far behind
the theorethic scince!
just see how far has technology went last 40 years
and ***** far theory went last 40 years.
no need to inflate more words about it its obvious
---------------

all the best

Y.Porat
-----------
.
User: "John Sefton"

Title: Re: The Standard Model Blows 21 Jan 2004 09:26:41 AM
Y.Porat wrote:

"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message news:<buk9r0$lfq$1@titan.btinternet.com>...

"Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@Optonline.Net> wrote in message
news:R927DQU438006.6211458333@anonymous...

thank the physacists


physicists


for making chips
for computers. but there


their


experteese


expertise


ends out of a block of silicone.


silicon


there


their


-------------
Frantz
the fact you stick to the wrong spelling means
you dont have much physical arguments to defend the standard Model

you cant obfuscate the fact that standard Model
has credited to itself much more than it realy deserves
not to mention its cheating parts

not all the chips achievenets belong to sm
most of it is to the big private laboratories including their
diligent Engineers that did the jobs
the great advance of technology is leaving far behind
the theorethic scince!
just see how far has technology went last 40 years
and ***** far theory went last 40 years.

no need to inflate more words about it its obvious
---------------

all the best


Y.Porat
-----------

But Frantzz can spell anyway!!
That's a great achievement.
Hey, it takes awhile
to figure out how something is made
by shattering it again and again
and again and again...........
They need BIGGER accelerators to shatter
things SMALLER.yeah, yeah, that's it!!!
THEN they can figure it out.
Not.
.
User: "Y.Porat"

Title: Re: The Standard Model Blows 26 Jan 2004 04:51:42 AM
John Sefton <john@petcom.com> wrote in message news:<400E9A31.2070903@petcom.com>...

Y.Porat wrote:

"Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message news:<buk9r0$lfq$1@titan.btinternet.com>...

"Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@Optonline.Net> wrote in message
news:R927DQU438006.6211458333@anonymous...

thank the physacists


physicists


for making chips
for computers. but there




there


their


-------------
Frantz
the fact you stick to the wrong spelling means
you dont have much physical arguments to defend the standard Model

you cant obfuscate the fact that standard Model
has credited to itself much more than it realy deserves
not to mention its cheating parts

not all the chips achievenets belong to sm
most of it is to the big private laboratories including their
diligent Engineers that did the jobs
the great advance of technology is leaving far behind
the theorethic scince!
just see how far has technology went last 40 years
and ***** far theory went last 40 years.

no need to inflate more words about it its obvious
---------------

all the best


Y.Porat
-----------


But Frantzz can spell anyway!!
That's a great achievement.
Hey, it takes awhile
to figure out how something is made
by shattering it again and again
and again and again...........
They need BIGGER accelerators to shatter
things SMALLER.yeah, yeah, that's it!!!
THEN they can figure it out.
Not.

-----------------
actually
you dont need bigger accelerators!
you cna just now
to realize, that a considerable part of story is a big fake
like 'virtual photons' inflation of mass etc
that should be dead on arival.
no need to be a geinus in order to detect it.
just to be honest and not to be a sucker
all the best
Y.porat
--------------------
.



User: "S. Enterprize Company"

Title: Re: The Standard Model Blows 22 Jan 2004 02:49:57 AM

"Anonymous" <BigappleRemailer@Optonline.Net> wrote in message
news:R927DQU438006.6211458333@anonymous...

thank the physacists


physicists

for making chips
for computers. but there


their

experteese


expertise

ends out of a block of silicone.


silicon

there


their

model of the hole


whole

world is just
a stoopid


stupid

silicone


silicon

dream. there


their

wave
partical


particle

dualaty


duality

explanation is
vibratons


vibrations

in crystals sometimes acting
like particals


particles

they call phonons.
they take the maths of crystels


crystals

and
fool around, and what do you know now
the whole world a block of silicone,


silicon

with electromagnic waves are now
a "harmonic occilater"


oscillator

get it, a
vibration like in there


their

silicone,


silicon

and
there


their

same magic maths that explained
the phonons in the silicone


silicon

they pull
out and say that electromagnic waves is
this same math and thats why there are
photons. And then they play around with
the group math that workd so well in
there crystels,


crystals

and suddenly they
have a model of the whole universe and
in there model everyone is weitless


weightless

lol.
the nitwits. you cant


can't

make a whole
unaverse out of a block of silicone.


silicon

get
out of that silicone


silicon

lab and look around
at the real world and see the whole
unaverse


universe

isnt the math in a block of

silicone.


silicon

duh. your silicone explanation

of maxwells


Maxwell's

and planks


Planck's

and einstines


Einstein's

mysterys


mysteries

is crap. your maths might be
good for silicone


silicon

but otherwise
einstain


Einstein

was right it blows.


That was the ***** poorest example of the mangling of language that I have
seen in a long time.
Are you a product of the modern style of education in the USA?
And you know no physics to boot.

Franz


Maybe his grammar has mistakes, but at least he is right about physics and
knows more than you.
Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
.


User: "Andr? Michaud"

Title: Re: The Standard Model Blows 22 Jan 2004 05:50:05 PM
Anonymous <BigappleRemailer@Optonline.Net> wrote in message news:<R927DQU438006.6211458333@anonymous>...

thank the physacists for making chips
for computers. but there experteese
ends out of a block of silicone. there
model of the hole world is just
a stoopid silicone dream. there wave
partical dualaty explanation is
vibratons in crystals sometimes acting
like particals they call phonons.
they take the maths of crystels and
fool around, and what do you know now
the whole world a block of silicone,
with electromagnic waves are now
a "harmonic occilater" get it, a
vibration like in there silicone, and
there same magic maths that explained
the phonons in the silicone they pull
out and say that electromagnic waves is
this same math and thats why there are
photons. And then they play around with
the group math that workd so well in
there crystels, and suddenly they
have a model of the whole universe and
in there model everyone is weitless lol.
the nitwits. you cant make a whole
unaverse out of a block of silicone. get
out of that silicone lab and look around
at the real world and see the whole
unaverse isnt the math in a block of
silicone. duh. your silicone explanation
of maxwells and planks and einstines
mysterys is crap. your maths might be
good for silicone but otherwise
einstain was right it blows.

-=-
This message was posted via two or more anonymous remailing services.

We recognized you Ahab.
.

User: "Earle Jones"

Title: Re: The Standard Model Blows 24 Jan 2004 10:23:29 PM
In article <R927DQU438006.6211458333@anonymous>,
Anonymous <BigappleRemailer@Optonline.Net> wrote:

thank the physacists for making chips
for computers. but there experteese
ends out of a block of silicone. there
model of the hole world is just
a stoopid silicone dream....

*
Getting beyond the above illiteracy is not worth the effort.
Are you a troll or just a dumb son-of-a-*****?
earle
*
.
User: "Robert J. Kolker"

Title: Re: The Standard Model Blows 24 Jan 2004 11:17:06 PM
Earle Jones wrote:

*
Getting beyond the above illiteracy is not worth the effort.

Are you a troll or just a dumb son-of-a-*****?

Both.
Bob Kolker
.


User: "Paul Cardinale"

Title: Re: The Standard Model Blows 20 Jan 2004 06:05:07 PM
Ow. My sides hurt.
.


  Page 1 of 1

1
 


Related Articles
THERE SHE BLOWS! (as Captain. Ahab would say...)
*** Is Mossad behind 911 and Blows up INDIAN Train to drive a wedge between India and Pakistan ? Thriving on Chaos ? ***
The Smart Model is Tired of The BS of QM and The Standard Model
Death, Hell & Suffering Will Remain In This World As Long As QM And The Standard Model Remains...
The Standard Model Has No Mass - Smart1234
Standard Model versus A Guage as the Angle
The Smart Model vs. The Standard Model
Re: Smart Model Proton Mass (Kg) Calculated With Comparisons To The Standard Model
Lorentz Violation of the Standard Model
Come On Man Show Us There's Nothing Wrong With The Standard Model
Problems with the Standard Model ... - But No problems With The Smart Model
What is the Standard Model
PROBLEMS OF THE STANDARD MODEL
Differences between matter and anti-matter in the Standard Model
Discovery of Neutrino Oscillation, Mass Upends Standard Model of Fundamental Forces and Particles
 

NEWER
pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER