The universe



 Science > Physics > The universe

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "dirk selis"
Date: 13 Mar 2005 11:46:52 PM
Object: The universe
Made some notes on paper , but asked myseelf if i'm right .
If as satellite flies to Mars , it has to go the other way then the earth .
And the energy needed :
Potential energy :
m * ( v2^2 / R2 - V1^2 / R1 ) * ( R2 - R1 )
Kinetic energy :
m * ( v2 - v1 )^2 / 2
Energy :
E^2 = E^2 potential + ( E kinetic earthroute - E kinetic marsroute )^2
with v1 = speed earth
v2 = speed mars
R1 = distance to earth
R2 = distance to mars
m = mass satellite
the tirth law of Kepler :
T^2 = cte * R^3 so
v = 2* Pi * R / T
v = 2 * Pi * ( 1 / cte / R )^0.5
it is independent of mass what the speed is of a certain distance . And you
need the changing of this speed for calculating the force needed .
So if you go to mars then you win in potential energy but you lose kinetic
energy . ( it's not the left - right vision but perpendicular )
And something else :
Time from big bang ( A ) / plancktime( B ) = Em force ( C ) / gravity of
protons ( D )
And mass of the universe ( E ) / mass proton ( F ) the square of the
previous comparison
So E / F = A^2 / B^2 = C^2 / D^2
E / A = F * C / ( D * B )
So the mass of the universe / time from big bang =
mass proton / plancktime * Em force / gravity of protons
Can you say then that there is birth of mass in the universe , that the
universe started with a little mass and that bij changing Em force you see
difference in massproduction , but the total amount of mass production stays
the same ?
And what if you multiply the mass of the universe / time from the big bang
with the spedd of removal of the universe ? Is that the force of the
universe ?
Dirk
.

User: "Sam Wormley"

Title: Re: The universe 14 Mar 2005 12:33:06 AM
dirk selis wrote:


If as satellite flies to Mars , it has to go the other way then the earth .

http://www-istp.gsfc.nasa.gov/stargaze/Smars1.htm
.
User: "dirk selis"

Title: Re: The universe 14 Mar 2005 02:08:39 AM


http://www-istp.gsfc.nasa.gov/stargaze/Smars1.htm

""""
V3 = 24.177 km/s
Comparing to
V2 = 21.632 km/s
we see that Mars is the one moving faster, and will be overtaking the
spaceship. To match velocities with Mars, the spaceship must generate an
extra boost of 2.545 km/s .
"""""""
If V2 is different of V3 , are the formula right then ?
They say the potential energy + kinetic energy = 0
But , isn't it perpendicular ?
Dirk
.


User: "Bjoern Feuerbacher"

Title: Re: The universe 15 Mar 2005 05:00:26 AM
dirk selis wrote:

Made some notes on paper , but asked myseelf if i'm right .

If as satellite flies to Mars , it has to go the other way then the earth .

Incomprehensible. Please rephrase.

And the energy needed :
Potential energy :
m * ( v2^2 / R2 - V1^2 / R1 ) * ( R2 - R1 )

Where did you get this formula from?

Kinetic energy :
m * ( v2 - v1 )^2 / 2

And this?

Energy :
E^2 = E^2 potential + ( E kinetic earthroute - E kinetic marsroute )^2

Why on earth do you add the squares of the energies?

with v1 = speed earth
v2 = speed mars
R1 = distance to earth
R2 = distance to mars
m = mass satellite

the tirth law of Kepler :

"third"
[snip more strange stuff]
Bye,
Bjoern
.

User: "Uncle Al"

Title: Re: The universe 14 Mar 2005 10:59:02 AM
dirk selis wrote:
[snip]

So the mass of the universe / time from big bang =

mass proton / plancktime * Em force / gravity of protons

Why don't you run the numbers and then compare with empirical
observation? The Large Numbers Hypothesis is only that.

Can you say then that there is birth of mass in the universe , that the
universe started with a little mass and that bij changing Em force you see
difference in massproduction , but the total amount of mass production stays
the same ?

No.

And what if you multiply the mass of the universe / time from the big bang
with the spedd of removal of the universe ? Is that the force of the
universe ?

No.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Article] Icebound telescope probes the Universe
Only seventy sextillion stars in the Universe
Re: New Universe Field vs. Old Universe Field And more.... ( The Door)
LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE
What is The Universe made of?
The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe
Re: Archimedes Plutonium Is A Loser (Was: Color Of The Universe Is Like Plutonium)
If the universe is shaped like a cone why does the sky look round?
ORJIGIN OF THE UNIVERSE
Cosmic Decreasing Gravity and the Expansion of the Universe
The Origin of The Universe / S D Rodrian
time, the universe and all. 03-03-05
THE UNIVERSE-GRAVITATION DEFINED
The Creation of the Universe and the One Fact (Formerly known as the Unified Theory). On creating Economic Heaven on Earth and nuking Hell (the Capitalists / Religionists) back to Hell. On Creating Critical Mass. On the conditions for world revolutio
The Accelerating Expansion of the Universe
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER