They Might Be Giants



 Science > Physics > They Might Be Giants

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "kT"
Date: 03 Feb 2008 09:09:31 PM
Object: They Might Be Giants
..
.

User: "CWatters"

Title: Re: They Might Be Giants 04 Feb 2008 03:44:53 AM
"kT" <cosmic@lifeform.org> wrote in message
news:Dkvpj.120$xF.84@newsfe02.lga...

.

Sorry, the government cancelled funding for that research project.
.
User: "kT"

Title: Re: They Might Be Giants 04 Feb 2008 08:02:14 AM
CWatters wrote:

"kT" <cosmic@lifeform.org> wrote in message
news:Dkvpj.120$xF.84@newsfe02.lga...

.


Sorry, the government cancelled funding for that research project.

That must explain the great success private industry has had with it.
.


User: "tadchem"

Title: Re: They Might Be Giants 04 Feb 2008 08:11:20 PM
On Feb 3, 10:09 pm, kT <cos...@lifeform.org> wrote:

.

As if we haven't hear THAT one before....
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
.

User: "Simpson"

Title: Re: They Might Be Giants 03 Feb 2008 09:15:06 PM
kT wrote:

.

Apparently, they are!
.

User: "Phil Cartwright"

Title: Re: They Might Be Giants 04 Feb 2008 04:59:56 PM
kT wrote:

.

Error 404: post not found.
--
There's only four things you can be certain of: taxes, change, spam, and
death.
.
User: "kT"

Title: Re: They Might Be Giants 04 Feb 2008 09:08:33 PM
Phil Cartwright wrote:

kT wrote:

.


Error 404: post not found.

Even I, normally an extremely *harsh* critic of all things superbowl and
super sunday related, having witnessed the entire Green Bay phenomena
during the early sixties myself, was impressed with the outcome here.
There was no way I was *not* going to watch those last few minutes.
Patriotism really is no longer a valid paradigm in this country.
'They Might Be Giants' is the new American national anthem.
.
User: "Eric Chomko"

Title: Re: They Might Be Giants 05 Feb 2008 12:34:52 PM
On Feb 4, 10:08=A0pm, kT <cos...@lifeform.org> wrote:

Phil Cartwright wrote:

kT wrote:

.


Error 404: post not found.


Even I, normally an extremely *harsh* critic of all things superbowl and
super sunday related, having witnessed the entire Green Bay phenomena
during the early sixties myself, was impressed with the outcome here.

There was no way I was *not* going to watch those last few minutes.

Patriotism really is no longer a valid paradigm in this country.

'They Might Be Giants' is the new American national anthem.

What about the propaganda piece in the beginning? NFL and the Founding
Fathers, rah, rah USA and NFL. Wow 10 solid minutes and even a token
woman (Pat Tillman's widow). I didn't know what to think other than
with all the steriods stuff in baseball; as if the NFL was really
vying to have the "National Pastime" forever changed. And then I
thought, geez, I hope they check those NFL players for steriods
someday!
Eric
.
User: "kT"

Title: Re: They Might Be Giants 05 Feb 2008 12:38:21 PM
Eric Chomko wrote:

On Feb 4, 10:08 pm, kT <cos...@lifeform.org> wrote:

Phil Cartwright wrote:

kT wrote:

.

Error 404: post not found.

Even I, normally an extremely *harsh* critic of all things superbowl and
super sunday related, having witnessed the entire Green Bay phenomena
during the early sixties myself, was impressed with the outcome here.

There was no way I was *not* going to watch those last few minutes.

Patriotism really is no longer a valid paradigm in this country.

'They Might Be Giants' is the new American national anthem.


What about the propaganda piece in the beginning? NFL and the Founding
Fathers, rah, rah USA and NFL. Wow 10 solid minutes and even a token
woman (Pat Tillman's widow). I didn't know what to think other than
with all the steriods stuff in baseball; as if the NFL was really
vying to have the "National Pastime" forever changed. And then I
thought, geez, I hope they check those NFL players for steriods
someday!

Fortunately, I only watched the last seven minutes of the game.
That's the extent of my interests in sports, but since the sports freaks
will be talking about this for decades I needed to be up to speed on it.
.
User: "Bob Cain"

Title: Re: They Might Be Giants 05 Feb 2008 08:09:17 PM
kT wrote:

That's the extent of my interests in sports, but since the sports freaks
will be talking about this for decades I needed to be up to speed on it.

I heard the last few minutes because the truck parked next to me in my pharmacy
parking lot happened to have it turned up too loud to ignore. Saved from
ignominy by circumstance, whew!
Bob
--
"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler."
A. Einstein
.



User: "Phil Cartwright"

Title: Re: They Might Be Giants 06 Feb 2008 12:20:21 AM
kT wrote:

Error 404: post not found.


Even I, normally an extremely *harsh* critic of all things superbowl[snip]

Oh, is *that* what this is all about?
Since I don't see any mention of the aerodynamics of a spinning
football, or the impulse given to a 70kg wide receiver by a body blow
from a 110kg linebacker traveling at 8km/h, or the minimum elevation and
muzzle velocity required to launch a football from the 35 yard line at
the goal and have it pass above the crossbar, I don't see how any of
this is relevant to sci.physics.
Since there are, to my knowledge, as yet no known cases of a punt or a
field goal achieving orbit (even when kicked by Lawrence Tynes) it also
seems irrelevant to sci.space.policy.
Since the most notable celebrity at the game, aside from the players
themselves, was Gisele Bundchen and she didn't even uncover her
Victoria's Secret lingerie, let alone bare a breast, and they didn't air
any political ads, it doesn't look like alt.politics.bush is a relevant
group either.
Since the number of offensive players that may legally be in motion at
the time of the snap isn't legislated by Congress, nor a case of
suspected pass interference tried in court, nor whether to retract the
stadium roof a White House executive decision, this subject seems
unlikely to be relevant in *.policy or alt.politics.* anyway.
So you've scored the trifecta: your usenet post was irrelevant in all
three groups it was crossposted to. The average being seventy percent. :)
F'up to sci.physics, for want of anything better that I actually read
regularly.
--
There's only four things you can be certain of: taxes, change, spam, and
death.
.




  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Simulation: Earth-like planets form in the wake of giants
Hwang Woo-suk and Albert Einstein: Dwarfs and Giants
Re: Ancient giants had erythrocytes twice as big as modern humans
On the Shoulders of Giants
Re: French stupidity concerning Iraq (they were right)
Re: Do You Want To Know For Sure That You Are Going To Heaven? The reason some people don't know for sure if they are going to Heaven when they die is because they just don't know. The good news is that you can know for sure that you are going to Hea
Do You Want To Know For Sure That You Are Going To Heaven? The reason some people don't know for sure if they are going to Heaven when they die is because they just don't know. The good news is that you can know for sure that you are going to Heaven
I have to be a GENIUS to be hated so much but they cannot admit a mistake
Terrorists, they brought my cats to the streets of this country
We never said they gave negative results, and they did not in fact give negative results (Miller 1926)
Re: If they aren't going to use it, why _did_ they invent the newton of force anyway?
Re: If they aren't going to use it, why _did_ they invent the newton of force anyway?
Physics Nobel Winners CALL EVOLUTION A FARCE -- Or They Should!
www.beyond-science.com if you build it they will kill you!!
" they were clinical trials" of what? to whom? did you deliberately infect a population?
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER