Science > Physics > Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Traveler" |
| Date: |
29 May 2005 04:00:59 AM |
| Object: |
Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show |
Columbia professor Brian Greene appeared on Art Bell's "Coast-to-Coast
AM, Weekend Edition" show last night. Greene, a geeky-sounding
superstring theorist, apparently was trying to sell his books "The
Elegant Universe" and "The Fabric of the Cosmos" to Art Bell's
wild-eyed audience of ghostbusters and alien abductees.
During the interview, Dr. Greene claimed that both the past and the
future exist, and that it is conceivable that in the distant future,
we will have developed technologies to manipulate or curve the fabric
of spacetime in such a way as to travel very huge distances and even
to the past or to the future.
Can somebody please drop the crackpot a line and let him know (as
forcefully as possible without actually killing the moron) that
nothing can move in spacetime and that spacetime cannot change? Thank
you.
Louis Savain
The Silver Bullet: Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix it
http://users.adelphia.net/~lilavois/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
|
|
| User: "Tim Golden" |
|
| Title: Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show |
29 May 2005 10:04:21 AM |
|
|
I randomly tuned in to this too.
Unfortunately I slept through most of it.
Having read his book and attended a presentation in Cambridge I am an
observer if not follower of Brian Greene. He has managed to become a
pop science figure with his Nova series.
I did pose the three-dimensionality of reality and that if we are going
to add dimensions we ought to derive the three 'extended' dimensions.
His response was fairly ignorant of this issue. But so is everyone
elses, but for a few. I would steer you to a string theorist who does
care if you would like.
Time is zero-dimensional according to the polysigned interpretation.
-Tim
.
|
|
|
| User: "Traveler" |
|
| Title: Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show |
29 May 2005 10:16:14 AM |
|
|
In article <1117379060.933212.62490@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"Tim Golden" <tttpppggg@yahoo.com> wrote:
I would steer you to a string theorist who does
care if you would like.
No thank you. String theory is crackpottery of the purest kind. If
only because string theorists have no clue as to what a dimension is.
They also have not figured out that reality is discrete. And to
include time as one of the dimensions of nature is a sign of a
cretinous mindset. A physical time dimension immediately makes motion
impossible. Deny at your own detriment.
Time is zero-dimensional according to the polysigned interpretation.
Why use this sort of brain-dead pompous language to describe something
which is very simple? Stop copying the pompous assholes in the physics
community. The vanity and pomposity of the assholes are now legendary.
Time is simply an abstract evolution parameter used in physics to
describe change. To describe change in time would require a meta-time
and a meta-meta-time for the meta-time, ad infinitum. This is the
reason that time is not a dimension and why spacetime is a frozen
block and why spacetime could not possibly be a model of anything in
nature. Spacetime is just continuing in the tradition of Newtonian
physics and Ptolemaic epicycles. It is just abstract mathematical crap
that explains nothing.
Louis Savain
The Silver Bullet: Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix it
http://users.adelphia.net/~lilavois/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "G=EMC^2 Glazier" |
|
| Title: Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show |
29 May 2005 11:51:56 AM |
|
|
Reality is time can flow backwards just as easy as forward. Brian Greene
is a great brain. His book the elegant universe is very well received.
String theory now has Ed Witten as one of its champions. There are
idiots that call these two men morons. (go figure) Bert
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert Kolker" |
|
| Title: Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show |
29 May 2005 08:51:37 PM |
|
|
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Reality is time can flow backwards just as easy as forward. Brian Greene
is a great brain. His book the elegant universe is very well received.
String theory now has Ed Witten as one of its champions. There are
idiots that call these two men morons. (go figure) Bert
These people are very, very smart and there is 0 emprical corroberation
of their theories. Or puting it another what, their "theories" are
speculation. In the absence of empricial corroberation, you have bupkis.
Bob Kolker
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Traveler" |
|
| Title: Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show |
29 May 2005 12:21:08 PM |
|
|
In article <13790-4299F32C-22@storefull-3173.bay.webtv.net>,
herbertglazier@webtv.net (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
Reality is time can flow backwards just as easy as forward. Brian Greene
is a great brain. His book the elegant universe is very well received.
String theory now has Ed Witten as one of its champions. There are
idiots that call these two men morons. (go figure) Bert
Ladies and gentlemen, Bert the magnificent has spoken in support one
of his favorite crackpots. One crackpot supporting another. That's
all. No need to panic.
Louis Savain
The Silver Bullet: Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix it
http://users.adelphia.net/~lilavois/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "T Wake" |
|
| Title: Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show |
29 May 2005 12:33:52 PM |
|
|
"Traveler" <traveler@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:hauj91lhb28m1tg6j34ci9v29lj3rf04e2@4ax.com...
In article <13790-4299F32C-22@storefull-3173.bay.webtv.net>,
herbertglazier@webtv.net (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
Reality is time can flow backwards just as easy as forward. Brian Greene
is a great brain. His book the elegant universe is very well received.
String theory now has Ed Witten as one of its champions. There are
idiots that call these two men morons. (go figure) Bert
Ladies and gentlemen, Bert the magnificent has spoken in support one
of his favorite crackpots. One crackpot supporting another. That's
all. No need to panic.
Louis Savain
Well, its interesting that this is your response. I suppose it make a change
from your normal scatalogically fascinated replies. However, what reasons
can you find in any widely accepted theory that time has a single direction
of travel?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Traveler" |
|
| Title: Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show |
29 May 2005 12:49:52 PM |
|
|
In article <BdidnbVLqpSZYATfRVnyiQ@pipex.net>, "T Wake"
<taswakeAt@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Traveler" <traveler@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:hauj91lhb28m1tg6j34ci9v29lj3rf04e2@4ax.com...
In article <13790-4299F32C-22@storefull-3173.bay.webtv.net>,
herbertglazier@webtv.net (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
Reality is time can flow backwards just as easy as forward. Brian Greene
is a great brain. His book the elegant universe is very well received.
String theory now has Ed Witten as one of its champions. There are
idiots that call these two men morons. (go figure) Bert
Ladies and gentlemen, Bert the magnificent has spoken in support one
of his favorite crackpots. One crackpot supporting another. That's
all. No need to panic.
Louis Savain
Well, its interesting that this is your response. I suppose it make a change
from your normal scatalogically fascinated replies.
When one is in the company of ***** kissers, one must call them what
they are. ...hahaha... There's nothing necessarily scatological about
***** sniffing unless the ***** kisser is also a ***** eater. But I do get
your exquisitely refined point... ...hahaha...
However, what reasons
can you find in any widely accepted theory that time has a single direction
of travel?
Time has ZERO direction of travel. Time is an evolution parameter used
to describe change in nature. It moves neither forward nor backward
nor in any other direction. Get a fucking clue... ...hahahaha...
HAHAHAHA... ...hahahaha... ...HAHAHAHA...
Louis Savain
The Silver Bullet: Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix it
http://users.adelphia.net/~lilavois/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "T Wake" |
|
| Title: Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show |
29 May 2005 02:08:06 PM |
|
|
"Traveler" <traveler@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:lrvj915stfj41otu6da2b1k2i56fkhgrns@4ax.com...
In article <BdidnbVLqpSZYATfRVnyiQ@pipex.net>, "T Wake"
<taswakeAt@hotmail.com> wrote:
However, what reasons
can you find in any widely accepted theory that time has a single
direction
of travel?
Time has ZERO direction of travel. Time is an evolution parameter used
to describe change in nature. It moves neither forward nor backward
nor in any other direction. Get a fucking clue... ...hahahaha...
HAHAHAHA... ...hahahaha... ...HAHAHAHA...
Without debating the movement of "time" itself, you have to accept that
objects move in time. You posted the message after I posted mine, and now I
am posting a reply. This requires a "Before" "Now" and "After" which are
commonly referred to as the "direction of time."
I am sure you are more than happy to circle around terminological
differences, however the fact remains. There is very little in the realms of
physics which says the sequence of events has to be from "before" to
"after." Entropy is the main cause, but as you feel time can not move I am
sure you have something else in mind for entropy.
By the way - off topic - have you and "hahahanson" decided to swap sign off
techniques or is there something else?
.
|
|
|
| User: "hanson" |
|
| Title: Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show |
29 May 2005 06:54:59 PM |
|
|
"T Wake" <taswakeAt@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:c-mdnfXJ3p2CjgffRVnytQ@pipex.net...
"Traveler" <traveler@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:lrvj915stfj41otu6da2b1k2i56fkhgrns@4ax.com...
In article <BdidnbVLqpSZYATfRVnyiQ@pipex.net>, "T Wake"
<taswakeAt@hotmail.com> wrote:
However, what reasons can you find in any widely accepted theory that time
has a single direction of travel?
[Louis]
Time has ZERO direction of travel. Time is an evolution parameter used to
describe change in nature. It moves neither forward nor backward nor in any
other direction. Get a fucking clue... ...hahahaha... HAHAHAHA...
...hahahaha... ...HAHAHAHA...
[The MV Wake]
Without debating the movement of "time" itself, you have to accept that
objects move in time. You posted the message after I posted mine, and now I am
posting a reply. This requires a "Before" "Now" and "After" which are commonly
referred to as the "direction of time."
I am sure you are more than happy to circle around terminological differences,
however the fact remains. There is very little in the realms of physics which
says the sequence of events has to be from "before" to "after." Entropy is the
main cause, but as you feel time can not move I am sure you have something
else in mind for entropy.
By the way - off topic - have you and "hahahanson" decided to swap sign off
techniques or is there something else?
[hanson]
..... ahahaha... AHAHAHA..... ahhhh, them "something else"s.... and
those damn "swap signs", technical or otherwise, huh?... ahahaha..
These questions are all emerging from and in Savain's physics,
which he has sufficiently explained to some. To others the enigma
remains:... are they of sequential/evolutionary nature if there is no time?
....are they of non-zero/integral or fractal characteristics in expanse if
there is no space? .... The resolution is really self-evident, because
already on much, very much vaster scales than in Savain's domain, at
1 or 2 mole sized magnitudes above, in QM at the atomic level, physics
begins to behaves non/counter intuitive..... ahahaha... ahahaha...
Some say, it's all *****.... even Louis himself says so. Sort it out!
But on the other hand, indeed and by all means, like Louis said:
"Phew! Physics is so much Phucking Phun! ...hahaha..."
Now, to make you happy my good old friend here materializes your
own hope and prediction:... {([over to Louis, in St. Louis])}.... ahahahaha...
AHAHAHHA.... ahahaha... ahahahanson
PS: Louis bought a license from me to the "ahahaha.... AHAHAHA"
He recognized it to be a very effective tool to get folks' attention and
crank their intellectual acuity & -span a notch or two up... ahahahaha...
Imbecies and especially the little green idiots are automatically weeded
out since they post at once elaborate thesis over the "meaning of ahaha"
ahahaha... ahahaha... AHAHAHAHA...
BTW, thanks for all the laughs, dude, not the least for your great disguises.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Traveler" |
|
| Title: Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show |
29 May 2005 06:45:33 PM |
|
|
In article <c-mdnfXJ3p2CjgffRVnytQ@pipex.net>, "T Wake"
<taswakeAt@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Traveler" <traveler@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:lrvj915stfj41otu6da2b1k2i56fkhgrns@4ax.com...
In article <BdidnbVLqpSZYATfRVnyiQ@pipex.net>, "T Wake"
<taswakeAt@hotmail.com> wrote:
However, what reasons
can you find in any widely accepted theory that time has a single
direction
of travel?
Time has ZERO direction of travel. Time is an evolution parameter used
to describe change in nature. It moves neither forward nor backward
nor in any other direction. Get a fucking clue... ...hahahaha...
HAHAHAHA... ...hahahaha... ...HAHAHAHA...
Without debating the movement of "time" itself, you have to accept that
objects move in time.
No I don't. Objects just move, period. They don't need time for that.
Time is abstractly abstracted from the motion/change and can be used
as an evolution parameter to compare one change/motion to another.
You posted the message after I posted mine, and now I
am posting a reply. This requires a "Before" "Now" and "After" which are
commonly referred to as the "direction of time."
"Before" and "after" does not require either the physical existence of
time or that time moves or changes. That's absurd.
I am sure you are more than happy to circle around terminological
differences, however the fact remains. There is very little in the realms of
physics which says the sequence of events has to be from "before" to
"after." Entropy is the main cause, but as you feel time can not move I am
sure you have something else in mind for entropy.
All I need in order to show the direction or order of a sequence is
the NOW and what I call complementarity. That is, I believe the NOW of
every particle (like everything else) obeys a yin-yang principle.
Every particle has two coexisting states which defines its NOW: a
"preceding" state (P) and a "succeeding" state (S). As the particle
changes, S unfolds into P while assuming a new value. This is the only
thing needed to show a direction or sequence order. In a non-changing
particle, both S and P are equal. Note that P and S are coexisting
states of the particle. There is neither past nor future.
By the way - off topic - have you and "hahahanson" decided to swap sign off
techniques or is there something else?
Nope. I shamelessly borrowed it from Hanson because I find it to be
very effective. ...hahaha... It infuriates my detractors... .hahaha...
HAHAHA... ...hahahaha...haaaaa...
Louis Savain
The Silver Bullet: Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix it
http://users.adelphia.net/~lilavois/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "yt56erd" |
|
| Title: Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show |
29 May 2005 06:48:20 PM |
|
|
The assmunching jerkoff known as Traveler wrote:
<snip>
nothing of value.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob Cain" |
|
| Title: Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show |
30 May 2005 03:28:05 AM |
|
|
Traveler wrote:
All I need in order to show the direction or order of a sequence is
the NOW and what I call complementarity. That is, I believe the NOW of
every particle (like everything else) obeys a yin-yang principle.
Every particle has two coexisting states which defines its NOW: a
"preceding" state (P) and a "succeeding" state (S). As the particle
changes, S unfolds into P while assuming a new value. This is the only
thing needed to show a direction or sequence order. In a non-changing
particle, both S and P are equal. Note that P and S are coexisting
states of the particle. There is neither past nor future.
Why do indentical clocks that are separated in space remain
synchronous?
Bob
--
"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no
simpler."
A. Einstein
.
|
|
|
| User: "Traveler" |
|
| Title: Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show |
30 May 2005 07:26:10 AM |
|
|
In article <d7eiqh0ehs@enews2.newsguy.com>, Bob Cain
<arcane@arcanemethods.com> wrote:
Traveler wrote:
All I need in order to show the direction or order of a sequence is
the NOW and what I call complementarity. That is, I believe the NOW of
every particle (like everything else) obeys a yin-yang principle.
Every particle has two coexisting states which defines its NOW: a
"preceding" state (P) and a "succeeding" state (S). As the particle
changes, S unfolds into P while assuming a new value. This is the only
thing needed to show a direction or sequence order. In a non-changing
particle, both S and P are equal. Note that P and S are coexisting
states of the particle. There is neither past nor future.
Why do indentical clocks that are separated in space remain
synchronous?
Uh, because they have pretty much the same mechanisms, energies,
etc..? What does this have to do with what is being discussed above?
Louis Savain
The Silver Bullet: Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix it
http://users.adelphia.net/~lilavois/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Ghost In The Machine" |
|
| Title: Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show |
30 May 2005 09:00:02 AM |
|
|
In sci.physics, Bob Cain
<arcane@arcanemethods.com>
wrote
on Mon, 30 May 2005 01:28:05 -0700
<d7eiqh0ehs@enews2.newsguy.com>:
Traveler wrote:
All I need in order to show the direction or order of a sequence is
the NOW and what I call complementarity. That is, I believe the NOW of
every particle (like everything else) obeys a yin-yang principle.
Every particle has two coexisting states which defines its NOW: a
"preceding" state (P) and a "succeeding" state (S). As the particle
changes, S unfolds into P while assuming a new value. This is the only
thing needed to show a direction or sequence order. In a non-changing
particle, both S and P are equal. Note that P and S are coexisting
states of the particle. There is neither past nor future.
Why do indentical clocks that are separated in space remain
synchronous?
If the space is strain-free and the clocks are motionless with
respect to each other they will indeed be synchronized, but
if they're moving with respect to one another or they are
in different strains (in Boulder, CO and in Paris, for example,
my understanding is that the former runs fast, as it's higher up
and therefore suffering a very slightly less amount of gravity)
they will not.
Bob
--
#191,
It's still legal to go .sigless.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "G=EMC^2 Glazier" |
|
| Title: Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show |
29 May 2005 06:59:45 PM |
|
|
There is no question that electromagnetic radiation such as
ultraviolet,light, radio waves,and gamma rays move towards the future.
That's in the macro realm. That is not 100% true in the micro realm . In
this tiny realm we have the subatomic particles and one is the "Kaon" it
makes reactions in this micro realm "time reversible" Hawking using
laws of QM would in time reverse the arrow of time. Thomas Gold
theorized that space containing all the light and heat if it ever
contracted would shove this energy back into the stars,and they would
now absorb,and that would heat them in the processes. This would cause
the arrow of time to point in the opposite direction.. Both Feynman
and Wheeler had a theory that was based on time reversed radiation is
permitted by the laws of electo magnetism,then it must exist in the
universe. My point in posting this is these men are great thinkers,and
their thoughts are open to more than one direction for the arrow of
time. Its always best to think in both directions Bert
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "G=EMC^2 Glazier" |
|
| Title: Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show |
29 May 2005 06:23:11 PM |
|
|
Louis you would not have the guts to call Greene.or Witten crack pots to
their face. You being both "idiot" and "coward" can only do it here. In
reality we are laughing at you because we know you do this in hopes we
will think you must be smarter then them.Sad way to boost your ego Bert
.
|
|
|
| User: "Traveler" |
|
| Title: Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show |
29 May 2005 06:56:54 PM |
|
|
In article <7365-429A4EDF-15@storefull-3176.bay.webtv.net>,
herbertglazier@webtv.net (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
Louis you would not have the guts to call Greene.or Witten crack pots to
their face.
Yes I would. And I would slap the stupid egotistical motherfuckers if
I could. I am sure they realize how much harm they're doing to society
with their useless and pathetic crap. Time travel, your *****. They have
no fucking excuse.
You being both "idiot" and "coward" can only do it here. In
reality we are laughing at you because we know you do this in hopes we
will think you must be smarter then them. Sad way to boost your ego Bert
You are an idiot, Bert. The sort of crap you've been posting here is
legendary. It makes sense that you would come to the defense of your
favorite crackpots. Kiss... *****... kiss... *****... hahaha...
But I don't need you to psychoanalyze me. I know I am no genius but I
also know when I am being conned and who the real crackpots are. Brian
Greene is a fucking crackpot and a con artist and so is the little
***** in the wheelchair. hahaha... hahaha... HAHAHA.. haha...
Louis Savain
The Silver Bullet: Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix it
http://users.adelphia.net/~lilavois/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Nick" |
|
| Title: Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show |
29 May 2005 08:00:45 PM |
|
|
Time moves forward in every direction.
And directions are curved.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Traveler" |
|
| Title: Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show |
29 May 2005 08:18:42 PM |
|
|
In article <1117414845.077205.235430@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"Nick" <macromitch@yahoo.com> wrote:
Time moves forward in every direction.
And directions are curved.
Yeah, I got a direction for you. Right here. ...hahaha....
HAHAHAHA...hahahaaaaa....HAHAHAHAAA...hahaha....HAHAHA...
Phew! Physics is so much Phucking Phun! ...hahaha...
Louis Savain
The Silver Bullet: Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix it
http://users.adelphia.net/~lilavois/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Nick" |
|
| Title: Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show |
29 May 2005 09:04:04 PM |
|
|
I see you're a laugh savian
.
|
|
|
| User: "abrasive" |
|
| Title: Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show |
31 May 2005 04:16:30 PM |
|
|
time ondulates backward from any direction, thats whay we perceive
motions forward in any directions as you correctly define
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mitch Perkins" |
|
| Title: Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show |
30 May 2005 12:00:53 PM |
|
|
Traveler wrote:
Can somebody please drop the crackpot a line and let him know (as
forcefully as possible without actually killing the moron) that
nothing can move in spacetime and that spacetime cannot change? Thank
you.
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/a1dd4bcfb503a7eb/2224707ca3b443cc?q=In+the+age+of+information+and+the+internet,+anybody+can+do+&rnum=13&hl=en#2224707ca3b443cc
"In the age of information and the internet, anybody can do physics
any way they see fit." - Traveler (not a physicist...)
Mitch P.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Traveler" |
|
| Title: Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show |
30 May 2005 01:04:25 PM |
|
|
In article <1117472453.709033.46490@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"Mitch Perkins" <mitchsperkins@yahoo.com> wrote:
Traveler wrote:
Can somebody please drop the crackpot a line and let him know (as
forcefully as possible without actually killing the moron) that
nothing can move in spacetime and that spacetime cannot change? Thank
you.
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/a1dd4bcfb503a7eb/2224707ca3b443cc?q=In+the+age+of+information+and+the+internet,+anybody+can+do+&rnum=13&hl=en#2224707ca3b443cc
"In the age of information and the internet, anybody can do physics
any way they see fit." - Traveler (not a physicist...)
Perkins, why don't you give it a rest? Greene is a threat to
scientific freedom because assholes like him siphon the taxpayer's
money away from more interesting and worthwhile research. Con artists
like Greene (and that conniving little motherphucker in the wheelchair
over in England) are preventing others from exercising their
scientific freedom. That's why I attack them.
Greene is a professor of physics which means that he gets to brainwash
the younger generation with his useless voodoo Star-Trek physics while
selling his crappy books to an unsuspecting public and laughing all
the way to the bank. He's free to do whatever he wants but not with
other people's money. I'll continue to attack the crackpots/charlatans
as long as I live.... hahaha... Besides, it's phucking phun....
hahahah... HAHAHAHA....
Physics is so much Phucking Phun.... hahaha...
Louis Savain
The Silver Bullet: Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix it
http://users.adelphia.net/~lilavois/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Capizzi" |
|
| Title: Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show |
05 Jun 2005 02:59:15 PM |
|
|
"Traveler" <traveler@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:9pkm911cdi70nfs4bq9mihmgvf4sa2mp1u@4ax.com...
In article <1117472453.709033.46490@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"Mitch Perkins" <mitchsperkins@yahoo.com> wrote:
Traveler wrote:
Can somebody please drop the crackpot a line and let him know (as
forcefully as possible without actually killing the moron) that
nothing can move in spacetime and that spacetime cannot change? Thank
you.
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/a1dd4bcfb503a7eb/2224707ca3b443cc?q=In+the+age+of+information+and+the+internet,+anybody+can+do+&rnum=13&hl=en#2224707ca3b443cc
"In the age of information and the internet, anybody can do physics
any way they see fit." - Traveler (not a physicist...)
Perkins, why don't you give it a rest? Greene is a threat to
scientific freedom because assholes like him siphon the taxpayer's
money away from more interesting and worthwhile research. Con artists
like Greene (and that conniving little motherphucker in the wheelchair
over in England) are preventing others from exercising their
scientific freedom. That's why I attack them.
You attack them because they are safe targets. You are too insignificant to
be noticed by them and are confident they won't reply.
Greene is a professor of physics which means that he gets to brainwash
the younger generation with his useless voodoo Star-Trek physics while
selling his crappy books to an unsuspecting public and laughing all
the way to the bank.
And you want to do the same with your crackpot physics, but nobody is
buying it. Good thing for you there is USENET. You can peddle your
unphysics for free.
He's free to do whatever he wants but not with
other people's money. I'll continue to attack the crackpots/charlatans
as long as I live.... hahaha... Besides, it's phucking phun....
hahahah... HAHAHAHA....
Physics is so much Phucking Phun.... hahaha...
Louis Savain
.
|
|
|
| User: "Traveler" |
|
| Title: Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show |
06 Jun 2005 08:58:55 AM |
|
|
In article <nQIoe.2669$wL2.2176@trndny07>, "Tom Capizzi"
<etianshrdlu@verizon.net> wrote:
You attack them because they are safe targets. You are too insignificant to
be noticed by them
Not for long, fuckface. ahaha...
and are confident they won't reply.
You'd be surprised to know trhat a few do reply. I ignore the fucking
crackpots. ahahahaha... ahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA... ahahaha...
Physics is so much Phucking Phun! ahahaha...
Louis Savain
The Silver Bullet: Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix it
http://users.adelphia.net/~lilavois/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Capizzi" |
|
| Title: Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show |
07 Jun 2005 03:17:58 AM |
|
|
"Traveler" <traveler@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:d1l8a1pp660gjr3qqq4mb4k0b4onhju1n1@4ax.com...
In article <nQIoe.2669$wL2.2176@trndny07>, "Tom Capizzi"
<etianshrdlu@verizon.net> wrote:
You attack them because they are safe targets. You are too insignificant
to
be noticed by them
Not for long, fuckface. ahaha...
and are confident they won't reply.
You'd be surprised to know trhat a few do reply. I ignore the fucking
crackpots. ahahahaha... ahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA... ahahaha...
Big talk from a little boy. Put up or shut up. Let's see the replies. By the
way, do you have a problem with tremors in your fingers, too?
Physics is so much Phucking Phun! ahahaha...
Louis Savain
The Silver Bullet: Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix it
http://users.adelphia.net/~lilavois/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show |
06 Jun 2005 03:30:59 PM |
|
|
Traveler wrote:
In article <nQIoe.2669$wL2.2176@trndny07>, "Tom Capizzi"
You attack them because they are safe targets. You are too insignificant to
be noticed by them
Not for long, fuckface. ahaha...
You SERIOUSLY need to get your eyes fixed, before you get your fucking
mouth fixed, *****!
Physics is so much Phucking Phun! ahahaha...
Go check into a psych ward where you belong.
.
|
|
|
| User: "T Wake" |
|
| Title: Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show |
06 Jun 2005 03:33:25 PM |
|
|
<markwh04@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1118089858.963633.86870@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Go check into a psych ward where you belong.
Sadly that could apply to an awful lot of people who post here. It seems to
me that almost every asylum must have an internet terminal
Traveller / Savian, as you will see is seriously "anally fixated" and has a
tendency towards "one-handed" typing if you catch my drift.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Traveler" |
|
| Title: Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show |
06 Jun 2005 03:47:12 PM |
|
|
In article <97KdnXABkpaFLjnfRVnygQ@pipex.net>, "T Wake"
<taswakeAt@hotmail.com> wrote:
<markwh04@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1118089858.963633.86870@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
[crap]
Did you too fuckfaces take turn fucking each other in the ***** last
night? HAHAHAHA... ahahaha... AHAHAHA... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
Louis Savain
The Silver Bullet: Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix it
http://users.adelphia.net/~lilavois/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Spud" |
|
| Title: Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show |
30 May 2005 02:38:16 PM |
|
|
Do you have any suggestions for experimental physics ?
Spud
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
