Tiny Flying Saucers Made In Laboratory?



 Science > Physics > Tiny Flying Saucers Made In Laboratory?

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Jack Sarfatti"
Date: 25 May 2004 02:35:04 AM
Object: Tiny Flying Saucers Made In Laboratory?
re: http://qedcorp.com/destiny/ExoticVacuumObjects.pdf
These mesoscopic EVOs are tiny "flying saucers" with warp drive in some
cases, i.e. observed anomalous self-acceleration.
A typical EVO charge cluster is 10^-4 cm across with a total charge of
Ne where N ~ 10^11.
Exactly how the vacuum coherence ~ Tr(K) is tweaked is not clear yet in
this phenomenon, but that it is so tweaked is the only plausible
explanation for the observed facts.
One way to test this EVO hypothesis is to look for an anti-gravity blue
shift of a sharp spectral line of a quantum jump in the interior of the
EVO if the zero point pressure is negative or a gravity red shift if the
zero point pressure is positive since the effective short-range G* >> G
here.
Ken
I am adding a section:
A typical EVO has r ~ 10^-4 cm, N = 10^11. Use the hydrogen atom as the
basis of comparison where r ~ 10^-8 cm and N = 1 with self-electrical
force ~ 10^+16 compared to the EVO self-electrical force 10^22x10^8 =
10^30 in these relative dimensionless units. That is, the
self-electrical force at the surface of the typical EVO assumed to be in
a spherical thin shell is ~ 10^14 stronger than the electrical force on
the atomic electron in the ground state of the hydrogen atom. Next
consider a single electron as a shell of charge e at the classical
electron radius 10^-13cm. The relative self-electric force is then
10^+26. Therefore, the electrical force of the typical mid-range EVO is
only about 10^4 larger than that on a single electron. The effective G*
induced by the zero point energy core needed to stabilize a single
spatially extended electron is ~ 10^40G. That is the effective Planck
length Lp* in the interior of a single electron is ~ 10^-13 cm. The
effective Planck length in the interior of a typical EVO is therefore ~
10^-11 cm ~ h/mc (a curious coincidence) since G* ~ Lp^*2. That is the
“Eddington number” G*/G ~ 10^44 to stabilize the typical EVO. Note in
this thin shell model the uniform zero point energy density core
actually has negative pressure to give a springy positive potential
self-energy that scales as r^5 whose force slope is opposite to the
positive Coulomb potential self-energy that scales as 1/r.
On May 23, 2004, at 9:49 AM, Ken Shoulders wrote:
Jack
A middle point for size is the 1 micrometer diameter EV. It has about
10^11 electrons in it. Measurements made on larger EVs are usually
groups of 1 micrometer beads stuck together in various ways. It is not a
good idea to give diameter measurements here. The smallest EVs I have
directly measured are about 0.2 micrometers in diameter but there are no
valid measurements for the number of electrons in these. From indirect
observation, it appears that the cluster size extends down to single
electron structures.
Ken
Jack Sarfatti wrote:
Ken give me some experimental numbers for observed EVOs
i.e. size "r" of the EVO
estimated number of electron charges N
On May 23, 2004, at 7:48 AM, Ken Shoulders wrote:
Jack
I have installed my FTP software and uploaded the EVO final in PDF
format. I am sure it is not perfect, but it will do for now. It is
located at:
http://www.svn.net/krscfs/
.

User: "*"

Title: Re: Tiny Flying Saucers Made In Laboratory? 25 May 2004 11:59:02 PM
I want to buy one, can you send it round my house about noon? We'll use it
for target practice.
"Jack Sarfatti" <sarfatti@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:IGCsc.3746$I74.1232@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com...

re: http://qedcorp.com/destiny/ExoticVacuumObjects.pdf

These mesoscopic EVOs are tiny "flying saucers" with warp drive in some
cases, i.e. observed anomalous self-acceleration.

A typical EVO charge cluster is 10^-4 cm across with a total charge of
Ne where N ~ 10^11.

Exactly how the vacuum coherence ~ Tr(K) is tweaked is not clear yet in
this phenomenon, but that it is so tweaked is the only plausible
explanation for the observed facts.

One way to test this EVO hypothesis is to look for an anti-gravity blue
shift of a sharp spectral line of a quantum jump in the interior of the
EVO if the zero point pressure is negative or a gravity red shift if the
zero point pressure is positive since the effective short-range G* >> G
here.

Ken

I am adding a section:

A typical EVO has r ~ 10^-4 cm, N = 10^11. Use the hydrogen atom as the
basis of comparison where r ~ 10^-8 cm and N = 1 with self-electrical
force ~ 10^+16 compared to the EVO self-electrical force 10^22x10^8 =
10^30 in these relative dimensionless units. That is, the
self-electrical force at the surface of the typical EVO assumed to be in
a spherical thin shell is ~ 10^14 stronger than the electrical force on
the atomic electron in the ground state of the hydrogen atom. Next
consider a single electron as a shell of charge e at the classical
electron radius 10^-13cm. The relative self-electric force is then
10^+26. Therefore, the electrical force of the typical mid-range EVO is
only about 10^4 larger than that on a single electron. The effective G*
induced by the zero point energy core needed to stabilize a single
spatially extended electron is ~ 10^40G. That is the effective Planck
length Lp* in the interior of a single electron is ~ 10^-13 cm. The
effective Planck length in the interior of a typical EVO is therefore ~
10^-11 cm ~ h/mc (a curious coincidence) since G* ~ Lp^*2. That is the
“Eddington number” G*/G ~ 10^44 to stabilize the typical EVO. Note in
this thin shell model the uniform zero point energy density core
actually has negative pressure to give a springy positive potential
self-energy that scales as r^5 whose force slope is opposite to the
positive Coulomb potential self-energy that scales as 1/r.



On May 23, 2004, at 9:49 AM, Ken Shoulders wrote:

Jack
A middle point for size is the 1 micrometer diameter EV. It has about
10^11 electrons in it. Measurements made on larger EVs are usually
groups of 1 micrometer beads stuck together in various ways. It is not a
good idea to give diameter measurements here. The smallest EVs I have
directly measured are about 0.2 micrometers in diameter but there are no
valid measurements for the number of electrons in these. From indirect
observation, it appears that the cluster size extends down to single
electron structures.

Ken

Jack Sarfatti wrote:

Ken give me some experimental numbers for observed EVOs

i.e. size "r" of the EVO

estimated number of electron charges N


On May 23, 2004, at 7:48 AM, Ken Shoulders wrote:

Jack

I have installed my FTP software and uploaded the EVO final in PDF
format. I am sure it is not perfect, but it will do for now. It is
located at:

http://www.svn.net/krscfs/




.
User: "dudalb"

Title: Re: Tiny Flying Saucers Made In Laboratory? 27 May 2004 12:04:48 AM
Anybody remeinded of the pie tin saucers Ed Wood created for "Plan Nine From
Outer Space".
.


User: "Brian Quincy Hutchings"

Title: Re: Tiny Flying Saucers Made In Laboratory? 25 May 2004 06:57:45 PM
the syntax of your dialogs is atrocious --
worse than the googolplex "ettiqquette" standard!

anyway, Shoulders's "digital engine" is great, although
isn't "homogenous composition compression ingition"
the same as "diesel?"
or is it spelled, mister Deisel?

what is "mesoscopic?"
Jack Sarfatti <sarfatti@pacbell.net> wrote in message news:<IGCsc.3746$I74.1232@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com>...

A typical EVO charge cluster is 10^-4 cm across with a total charge of
Ne where N ~ 10^11.


http://www.svn.net/krscfs/

--ils duces d'Enron!
http://tarpley.net
.
User: "Brian Quincy Hutchings"

Title: Re: Tiny Flying Saucers Made In Laboratory? 26 May 2004 05:37:14 PM
this could be important. I recall an article
in Sci.Am. about improvements to diesel,
called "green diesel," and they used a similar acronym,
for what was (I think) a different concept.
anyway, maximum enviro "liberal media
that is owned by conswervatives" hype has junked all sorts
of diesel engines on busses etc.,
in favor of natural gas, when its mileage is excellent,
already. mainly because of the soot, and
the infamous *linear no-threshold* standard
(see ... it's not on http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/
any more, but there's a good article in the current New Fed:
I didn't know that the author actually was in charge
of ameliorating the effects of Chernobyl on Poland, and
he did that before the KGB let it be known, What !-)
[PS: this is a great, though truncated issue, May 24's, because
it shows how a House Cmte. did *not* have a planned hearing,
to which we'd submitted written testimony,
on getting rid of the notorious Help America Vote Act --
and all computerized tabulations of ballots.]
QncyMI@netscape.net (Brian Quincy Hutchings) wrote in message news:<bde404c9.0405251557.79cebc80@posting.google.com>...

isn't "homogenous composition compression ingition"
the same as "diesel?"


--ils duces d'Enron!
http://tarpley.net
.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Flying Saucers
How ET alien flying saucers shoot down Russian MIGs
Nazi flying saucers
Visser & Lobos new warp drive paper & flying saucers
Superconducting Gravimagnetiic Dynamo for Flying Saucers?
On Dark Energy, Qabala, Paranormal and Flying Saucers
DIA Engineer allegedly working on flying saucers with Russian?
re: Visser & Lobo's new warp drive paper & flying saucers - typocorrection
Cosmological Constant and Flying Saucers?
Re: Flying...
Re: Fantastic Flying 757 Engine was Re: The Ultimate Pentagon 9/11 Question Andy Carol couldn't answer. was Re: Flight 175 WAS a FUEL TANKER, for REAL. This is not a "theory".
Re: Should not NASA be investigating Yogic Flying in the Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Program?
re: Gennady Shipov and jack Sarfatti on Flying Saucer Physics
flying car
ETs in their Magnificent Flying Machines
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER