| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Sergey Karavashkin" |
| Date: |
14 Jan 2005 04:22:02 PM |
| Object: |
To Androcles about MMX |
From:Dirk Van de moortel
(dirkvandemoortel@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com)
Subject:Re: To Androcles about MMX
Newsgroup:sci.physics
Date:2005-01-09 13:32:09 PST
"Androcles" <dummy@dummy.net> wrote in message news:dCgEd.47671$C8.27690@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
"Sergey Karavashkin" <selftrans@yandex.ru> wrote in message
news:a42650fc.0501081444.3bf612af@posting.google.com...
[snip]
Happy New year,
Sergey
You too, but I have to inform you that I do not have sufficent time to
read
all of your post. Please state in as few words as possible what your
position
is. In depth examination can follow once I understand where you are
coming from.
Androcles.
Dirk Van de moortel (dirkvandemoortel@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com) wrote in message news:sphEd.26182$8o.1837174@phobos.telenet-ops.be...
Sergey comes from a land where there are functions with a
curl(grad) that severely differs from zero:
http://groups-beta.google.com/groups?q=author%3Asergey+grad+curl
With this in mind he might have a look at the orientation of
your MMX mirrors:
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/AndroMMX.html
This might get interesting.
Dirk Vdm
Sergey:
As I see, Dirk, you vaste time. I told you then, the problem with
curl(grad) is, our theorem was confined by transverse waves. There
exists the generalisation, and for today we have found it. Some time
later we will publish it. Thus, you, guy, are losing your chance for
Nobel prize. ;-)
Thank you for referring me to your page of Androcles' MMX model
analysis, I will look it though.
Sergey
.
|
|
| User: "Franz Heymann" |
|
| Title: Re: To Androcles about MMX |
15 Jan 2005 09:20:00 AM |
|
|
"Sergey Karavashkin" <selftrans@yandex.ru> wrote in message
news:a42650fc.0501141422.5a3fd8d4@posting.google.com...
[snip]
As I see, Dirk, you vaste time. I told you then, the problem with
curl(grad) is, our theorem was confined by transverse waves.
You are a confirmed idiot if you still believe that curl grad ( ) can
ever be anything other than zero.
Franz
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dirk Van de moortel" |
|
| Title: Re: To Androcles about MMX |
14 Jan 2005 04:51:28 PM |
|
|
"Sergey Karavashkin" <selftrans@yandex.ru> wrote in message news:a42650fc.0501141422.5a3fd8d4@posting.google.com...
[snip]
Dirk Van de moortel (dirkvandemoortel@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com) wrote in message
news:sphEd.26182$8o.1837174@phobos.telenet-ops.be...
Sergey comes from a land where there are functions with a
curl(grad) that severely differs from zero:
http://groups-beta.google.com/groups?q=author%3Asergey+grad+curl
With this in mind he might have a look at the orientation of
your MMX mirrors:
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/AndroMMX.html
This might get interesting.
Dirk Vdm
Sergey:
As I see, Dirk, you vaste time. I told you then, the problem with
curl(grad) is, our theorem was confined by transverse waves.
No, the problem was that you made a very simple mistake by
swapping the two angular coordinates after having applied
grad and before applying curl.
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/72b73c5fd98f8a36
messages 6, 8, 10
The fact that you don't aknowledge that puts you right in
Androcles' camp. He has made fumbling and refusing to
aknowledge his mistakes into a way of life.
You will notice soon enough yourself.
There
exists the generalisation, and for today we have found it. Some time
later we will publish it. Thus, you, guy, are losing your chance for
Nobel prize. ;-)
Thank you for referring me to your page of Androcles' MMX model
analysis, I will look it though.
Yes, have a good laugh :-)
Dirk Vdm
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
