| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
19 Sep 2006 06:51:59 PM |
| Object: |
Top 1% OWNS MORE THAN bottom 90% |
http://wakeupfromyourslumber.blogspot.com/2006/09/top-1-owns-more-than-bottom-90_19.html
.
|
|
| User: "Peter Webb" |
|
| Title: OT: Re: Top 1% OWNS MORE THAN bottom 90% |
20 Sep 2006 07:03:47 PM |
|
|
<schoenfeld.one@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158709919.894005.75820@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
http://wakeupfromyourslumber.blogspot.com/2006/09/top-1-owns-more-than-bottom-90_19.html
Why stop at wealth within a country? Why not wealth between countries?
The imbalance in wealth between OECD countries vs the developing world is
much greater. Shouldn't we engage in a massive program of the developed
world transferring (say) 50% of its wealth to poorer nations?
Indeed, do you personally do so? You have an internet connection, so you are
richer than 90% of Indians and 99% of Nepalese. I assume that if you believe
wealth redistribution is morally desirable, you would have started by making
massive donations to people poorer than you (ie almost everybody in
developing countries) rather than complaining that you personally want more.
Otherwise rather than looking at moral arguments, it looks suspiciously that
you personally (already very rich by world standards) simply want more for
yourself.
.
|
|
|
| User: "tonyp" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: Top 1% OWNS MORE THAN bottom 90% |
20 Sep 2006 08:15:24 PM |
|
|
"Peter Webb" <webbfamily-diespamdie@optusnet.com.au> wrote
You have an internet connection, so you are
richer than 90% of Indians and 99% of Nepalese.
I assume that if you believe wealth redistribution
is morally desirable, you would have started by making
massive donations to people poorer than you
Bill Gates owns rather more than "an internet connection". He is devoting
his time as well as his money to "wealth redistribution" these days. As a
poster boy for, if not a real hero of, winner-take-all capitalism, Mr. Gates
demostrably believes in "making massive donations to people poorer than"
himself.
So we have at least one example of a bleeding heart in the first rank of
capitalists. What does that example teach us? Does it teach, for instance,
that a "free market" is the best way to help the world's poor?
-- TP
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Re: Top 1% OWNS MORE THAN bottom 90% |
21 Sep 2006 01:39:07 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:03:47 +1000, "Peter Webb"
<webbfamily-diespamdie@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
<schoenfeld.one@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158709919.894005.75820@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
http://wakeupfromyourslumber.blogspot.com/2006/09/top-1-owns-more-than-bottom-90_19.html
Why stop at wealth within a country? Why not wealth between countries?
Because the distribution of wealth within a country is an artefact of
the economic policies pursued by that country's government. There is
no comparable institution responsible for the international wealth
distribution.
The imbalance in wealth between OECD countries vs the developing world is
much greater. Shouldn't we engage in a massive program of the developed
world transferring (say) 50% of its wealth to poorer nations?
No, that would be stupid. You don't cure an institutional disease
(injustice) by trying to reverse one symptom (inequality of wealth).
Indeed, do you personally do so? You have an internet connection, so you are
richer than 90% of Indians and 99% of Nepalese. I assume that if you believe
wealth redistribution is morally desirable, you would have started by making
massive donations to people poorer than you (ie almost everybody in
developing countries) rather than complaining that you personally want more.
Otherwise rather than looking at moral arguments, it looks suspiciously that
you personally (already very rich by world standards) simply want more for
yourself.
<sigh> When in the whole history of the world has it ever been
possible for people of conscience to object to injustice, and not be
accused of envy for its beneficiaries?
"The only reason you object to slavery is because you envy the people
who own slaves. So just get some slaves of your own. Problem
solved!"
-- Roy L
.
|
|
|
| User: "Peter Webb" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Re: Top 1% OWNS MORE THAN bottom 90% |
22 Sep 2006 09:25:13 AM |
|
|
<royls@telus.net> wrote in message news:45120795.54496054@news.telus.net...
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:03:47 +1000, "Peter Webb"
<webbfamily-diespamdie@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
<schoenfeld.one@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158709919.894005.75820@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
http://wakeupfromyourslumber.blogspot.com/2006/09/top-1-owns-more-than-bottom-90_19.html
Why stop at wealth within a country? Why not wealth between countries?
Because the distribution of wealth within a country is an artefact of
the economic policies pursued by that country's government. There is
no comparable institution responsible for the international wealth
distribution.
So, why not? An international Government that taxes the rich nations and
subsidises the poor?
The imbalance in wealth between OECD countries vs the developing world is
much greater. Shouldn't we engage in a massive program of the developed
world transferring (say) 50% of its wealth to poorer nations?
No, that would be stupid. You don't cure an institutional disease
(injustice) by trying to reverse one symptom (inequality of wealth).
But doesn't the same argument apply domestically? Wealth redistribution
takes capital away from productive people and moves it to less productive.
If you are going to have poor people earning more, wouldn't this money be
better and more morally spent in India than in Tennessee trailer parks?
Indeed, do you personally do so? You have an internet connection, so you
are
richer than 90% of Indians and 99% of Nepalese. I assume that if you
believe
wealth redistribution is morally desirable, you would have started by
making
massive donations to people poorer than you (ie almost everybody in
developing countries) rather than complaining that you personally want
more.
Otherwise rather than looking at moral arguments, it looks suspiciously
that
you personally (already very rich by world standards) simply want more for
yourself.
<sigh> When in the whole history of the world has it ever been
possible for people of conscience to object to injustice, and not be
accused of envy for its beneficiaries?
Injustice? Presumably you sit somewhere in the middle between Warren Buffett
and a Nepalese porter. You say Warren should have to give most of his money
to you because he is richer than you, but you won't countenance giving most
of yours to a Nepalese porter. How could that possibly not be self-serving
at best?
"The only reason you object to slavery is because you envy the people
who own slaves. So just get some slaves of your own. Problem
solved!"
-- Roy L
I don't particularly envy Warren Buffett or anybody else. I have an
excellent life.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Nospam" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Re: Top 1% OWNS MORE THAN bottom 90% |
22 Sep 2006 05:45:37 PM |
|
|
Wealth redistribution takes capital away from productive people and moves
it to less productive.
That is actually big mythology. A company have 2 sources of money:
- investments
- sales
Think at macroeconomic scale.
1. If you take a certain amount of money from investors and give it to
customers they will end up in the same place: to the company.
2. If you take a certain amount of money from customers and give it to
investors they will end up in the same place: to the company.
The difference is how they reach that point and what they do in process.
1. The investors will not buy anymore shares, nor will create a new company
for that money. But that money provide more goods to consumers. The extra
proffit made provide the company the ability to expand it capacity.
2. These money will provide less goods to consumers. But they will create a
new company OR will buy more shares to the investor into an existing
company by expanding it production capacity.
The obvious difference is that 2. maintain the distribution of wealth as it
is while 1. can change it. But if we consider that the money payed to
investors are actually from dividends the difference vanish away.
The only remaining difference is that in 2. the investors can start new
businesses improving the competition while 1. will preserve the existing
situation in exchange to providing more goods to the poor.
However, there is another difference more hidden. In 2. you take money from
consumers and give them to investors. But the investors see that the demand
decline. They are not going to invest until the situation stabilize. By
hoarding the money the monetary mass in circulation on the market decrease
and the business cycle slows down to compensate for the decreased demand.
We entered into a recession.
Conclusion:
A well designed welfare system is not going to harm the economy contrary to
popular opinion. But can act as a big stabilizer preventing or reducing a
recession.
"Business friendly" political actions while provide "incentive" to investors
are very likely to induce a recession. This is while so called "business
friendly" actions like tax cuts & co I rather call them "rich friendly" and
not business friendly.
And yes, I predict a serious recession in next 1 to 3 years as a direct
result of tax cuts.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Re: Top 1% OWNS MORE THAN bottom 90% |
22 Sep 2006 12:52:16 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 00:25:13 +1000, "Peter Webb"
<webbfamily-diespamdie@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
<royls@telus.net> wrote in message news:45120795.54496054@news.telus.net...
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:03:47 +1000, "Peter Webb"
<webbfamily-diespamdie@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
<schoenfeld.one@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158709919.894005.75820@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
http://wakeupfromyourslumber.blogspot.com/2006/09/top-1-owns-more-than-bottom-90_19.html
Why stop at wealth within a country? Why not wealth between countries?
Because the distribution of wealth within a country is an artefact of
the economic policies pursued by that country's government. There is
no comparable institution responsible for the international wealth
distribution.
So, why not? An international Government that taxes the rich nations and
subsidises the poor?
<sigh> Why are the apologists for privilege and injustice always so
stupid and dishonest?
Oh. Right.
The imbalance in wealth between OECD countries vs the developing world is
much greater. Shouldn't we engage in a massive program of the developed
world transferring (say) 50% of its wealth to poorer nations?
No, that would be stupid. You don't cure an institutional disease
(injustice) by trying to reverse one symptom (inequality of wealth).
But doesn't the same argument apply domestically?
Yes.
Wealth redistribution
takes capital away from productive people and moves it to less productive.
<sigh> No, the current system of wealth redistribution uses
government to take capital away from the productive working poor and
middle class who have earned it and gives it to the idle, unproductive
rich who have not. I simply propose to halt that unjust and
economically damaging system of forcible theft and upward
redistribution of wealth by government.
If you are going to have poor people earning more, wouldn't this money be
better and more morally spent in India than in Tennessee trailer parks?
That depends on whether it is obtained by making a contribution to
production or by exacting economic rents from those who do through
ownership of unjust privileges.
Indeed, do you personally do so? You have an internet connection, so you
are
richer than 90% of Indians and 99% of Nepalese. I assume that if you
believe
wealth redistribution is morally desirable, you would have started by
making
massive donations to people poorer than you (ie almost everybody in
developing countries) rather than complaining that you personally want
more.
Otherwise rather than looking at moral arguments, it looks suspiciously
that
you personally (already very rich by world standards) simply want more for
yourself.
<sigh> When in the whole history of the world has it ever been
possible for people of conscience to object to injustice, and not be
accused of envy for its beneficiaries?
Injustice?
Yes. Injustice. Can't you read? Or think?
Presumably you sit somewhere in the middle between Warren Buffett
and a Nepalese porter. You say Warren should have to give most of his money
to you because he is richer than you,
No, now you are just lying again. I have neither said nor implied any
such thing.
Like all defenders of privilege and injustice, you are nothing but
stupid, vicious, greedy, evil, lying filth.
but you won't countenance giving most
of yours to a Nepalese porter. How could that possibly not be self-serving
at best?
Let me know if you ever feel like actually addressing the issue.
"The only reason you object to slavery is because you envy the people
who own slaves. So just get some slaves of your own. Problem
solved!"
I don't particularly envy Warren Buffett or anybody else. I have an
excellent life.
And you are telling me to get my own "excellent life," and that that
will somehow solve the problem that my and your excellent life will
probably both have been purchased at the expense of injustices
inflicted on others, making their lives less excellent. Sorry, but
some of us do not regard suffering unjustly inflicted on others as an
acceptable price for our own enrichment.
-- Roy L
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ahmed Ouahi, Architect" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Re: Top 1% OWNS MORE THAN bottom 90% |
22 Sep 2006 01:42:45 PM |
|
|
However, there is an evil usual technic used along the socialism, and it is,
a simply, that they do block a people -especially the poors, that they do
prefabricates them- from an access to money, means, at least the work.
Therefore, and they do put to them the products of a consumption very
expensive, that they do still always dependant and they do still down along
the need as along a definitely to be pushed of an asking of a help, as no
other issue, and makes them to feel that they are more controlled, that they
do remain only with a sadness and the fear .
Therefore, as it is in this time, they do put them very down, sociologically
and a psychologically, and makes them to feel, that they are a just an
useless matter, as a useless material and they are helping them.
Therefore, concerning the riches along the capitalism, they are a necessary
matter, it is a themeselves-riches-that, they do provide the poors and any
one, as also a people along the needs with a work and an access to a money,
along their dignity, a definitely as a matter a fact.
--
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
Best Regards!
<royls@telus.net> wrote in message news:4513f51f.4822867@news.telus.net...
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 00:25:13 +1000, "Peter Webb"
<webbfamily-diespamdie@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
<royls@telus.net> wrote in message
news:45120795.54496054@news.telus.net...
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:03:47 +1000, "Peter Webb"
<webbfamily-diespamdie@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
<schoenfeld.one@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158709919.894005.75820@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
http://wakeupfromyourslumber.blogspot.com/2006/09/top-1-owns-more-than-botto
m-90_19.html
Why stop at wealth within a country? Why not wealth between countries?
Because the distribution of wealth within a country is an artefact of
the economic policies pursued by that country's government. There is
no comparable institution responsible for the international wealth
distribution.
So, why not? An international Government that taxes the rich nations and
subsidises the poor?
<sigh> Why are the apologists for privilege and injustice always so
stupid and dishonest?
Oh. Right.
The imbalance in wealth between OECD countries vs the developing world
is
much greater. Shouldn't we engage in a massive program of the developed
world transferring (say) 50% of its wealth to poorer nations?
No, that would be stupid. You don't cure an institutional disease
(injustice) by trying to reverse one symptom (inequality of wealth).
But doesn't the same argument apply domestically?
Yes.
Wealth redistribution
takes capital away from productive people and moves it to less
productive.
<sigh> No, the current system of wealth redistribution uses
government to take capital away from the productive working poor and
middle class who have earned it and gives it to the idle, unproductive
rich who have not. I simply propose to halt that unjust and
economically damaging system of forcible theft and upward
redistribution of wealth by government.
If you are going to have poor people earning more, wouldn't this money be
better and more morally spent in India than in Tennessee trailer parks?
That depends on whether it is obtained by making a contribution to
production or by exacting economic rents from those who do through
ownership of unjust privileges.
Indeed, do you personally do so? You have an internet connection, so
you
are
richer than 90% of Indians and 99% of Nepalese. I assume that if you
believe
wealth redistribution is morally desirable, you would have started by
making
massive donations to people poorer than you (ie almost everybody in
developing countries) rather than complaining that you personally want
more.
Otherwise rather than looking at moral arguments, it looks suspiciously
that
you personally (already very rich by world standards) simply want more
for
yourself.
<sigh> When in the whole history of the world has it ever been
possible for people of conscience to object to injustice, and not be
accused of envy for its beneficiaries?
Injustice?
Yes. Injustice. Can't you read? Or think?
Presumably you sit somewhere in the middle between Warren Buffett
and a Nepalese porter. You say Warren should have to give most of his
money
to you because he is richer than you,
No, now you are just lying again. I have neither said nor implied any
such thing.
Like all defenders of privilege and injustice, you are nothing but
stupid, vicious, greedy, evil, lying filth.
but you won't countenance giving most
of yours to a Nepalese porter. How could that possibly not be
self-serving
at best?
Let me know if you ever feel like actually addressing the issue.
"The only reason you object to slavery is because you envy the people
who own slaves. So just get some slaves of your own. Problem
solved!"
I don't particularly envy Warren Buffett or anybody else. I have an
excellent life.
And you are telling me to get my own "excellent life," and that that
will somehow solve the problem that my and your excellent life will
probably both have been purchased at the expense of injustices
inflicted on others, making their lives less excellent. Sorry, but
some of us do not regard suffering unjustly inflicted on others as an
acceptable price for our own enrichment.
-- Roy L
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Re: Top 1% OWNS MORE THAN bottom 90% |
23 Sep 2006 03:14:35 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 21:42:45 +0300, "Ahmed Ouahi, Architect"
<ahmed.ouahi@welho.com> wrote:
However, there is an evil usual technic used along the socialism, and it is,
a simply, that they do block a people -especially the poors, that they do
prefabricates them- from an access to money, means, at least the work.
Therefore, and they do put to them the products of a consumption very
expensive, that they do still always dependant and they do still down along
the need as along a definitely to be pushed of an asking of a help, as no
other issue, and makes them to feel that they are more controlled, that they
do remain only with a sadness and the fear .
Therefore, as it is in this time, they do put them very down, sociologically
and a psychologically, and makes them to feel, that they are a just an
useless matter, as a useless material and they are helping them.
Therefore, concerning the riches along the capitalism, they are a necessary
matter, it is a themeselves-riches-that, they do provide the poors and any
one, as also a people along the needs with a work and an access to a money,
along their dignity, a definitely as a matter a fact.
The perils of Google translator...
-- Roy L
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ahmed Ouahi, Architect" |
|
| Title: Re: OT: Re: Top 1% OWNS MORE THAN bottom 90% |
23 Sep 2006 08:33:03 AM |
|
|
Do not ever worry, nothing does change the point, especially when it does
hurt.
--
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
Think About That!
<royls@telus.net> wrote in message news:4514c32b.57579482@news.telus.net...
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 21:42:45 +0300, "Ahmed Ouahi, Architect"
<ahmed.ouahi@welho.com> wrote:
However, there is an evil usual technic used along the socialism, and it
is,
a simply, that they do block a people -especially the poors, that they do
prefabricates them- from an access to money, means, at least the work.
Therefore, and they do put to them the products of a consumption very
expensive, that they do still always dependant and they do still down
along
the need as along a definitely to be pushed of an asking of a help, as no
other issue, and makes them to feel that they are more controlled, that
they
do remain only with a sadness and the fear .
Therefore, as it is in this time, they do put them very down,
sociologically
and a psychologically, and makes them to feel, that they are a just an
useless matter, as a useless material and they are helping them.
Therefore, concerning the riches along the capitalism, they are a
necessary
matter, it is a themeselves-riches-that, they do provide the poors and
any
one, as also a people along the needs with a work and an access to a
money,
along their dignity, a definitely as a matter a fact.
The perils of Google translator...
-- Roy L
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Peter_Bj=F8rn_Perls=F8?=" |
|
| Title: Re: Top 1% OWNS MORE THAN bottom 90% |
20 Sep 2006 06:49:06 AM |
|
|
<schoenfeld.one@gmail.com> wrote:
http://wakeupfromyourslumber.blogspot.com/2006/09/top-1-owns-more-than-b
ottom-90_19.html
Your point?
-- regards , Peter B. P. - liberterran.org, markedspartiet.dk,
macplanet.dk "The politicians don't just want your money. They want your
soul. They want you to be worn down by taxes until you are dependent and
helpless." - James Dale Davidson, National Taxpayers Union
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Brad Guth" |
|
| Title: Re: Top 1% OWNS MORE THAN bottom 90% |
02 Oct 2006 11:02:41 AM |
|
|
"schoenfeld.one" <schoenfeld.one@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158709919.894005.75820@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com
http://wakeupfromyourslumber.blogspot.com/2006/09/top-1-owns-more-than-bottom-90_19.html
It's actually within the top 0.1% that's pulling the vast bulk of our
strings.
There are absolutely terrific topics as Ed Conrad's "man old as coal"
and those of my "Other Life existing/coexisting on Venus" to behold,
just not the least bit viable to share and honestly discuss within this
disinformation-R-us cesspool of such brown-nosed infomercial science
crapolla called ROM or much of anything else within this Jewish
dominated Usenet.
Perhaps folks that can't honestly share nor much less stand to hear yet
another word about the truth should take this quest of their's for
topic/author stalking, bashing and banishing the truth and nothing but
the truth up with the likes of SEFORA. I mean to suggest, as far as I
know the laws of physics really haven't actually changed simply to suit
our MI/NSA~NASA/Apollo ruse/sting of our perpetrated cold wars, and of
hard replicated science is still representing the best available truth
in town, that is unless you folks still can't believe your own eyes nor
otherwise manage to deductively connect a few of those dots.
I certainly wish those <http://www.sefora.org> scientists and engineers
the absolute very best of luck. JFK was once upon a time a fair enough
game player on behalf of science and technology, and got summarily
rather dead for being such.
Their "National Agenda" starts off with way too much honesty and truth,
that is if that truth can ever be told. Their blogs via Michael
Stebbins are for the moment fairly empty, but lets see what happens
next. Too bad the likes of SETI/OSETI nor even Mensa doesn't even
remotely qualify.
Usenet truth certainly isn't worth squat, as lies beget lies and liars
spawn liars.
Earth truth isn't exactly possible because Mensa = Skull and Bones
Moon truth gets even so much worse yet because Mensa = Third Reich
Venus truth is entirely off their charts and still running itself
scared.
Sirius truth simply isn't allowed to exist, no matters what the
consequences.
Topic/author stalking, avoidance and/or banishment has been Usenet
status quo.
Excluding whatever evidence rocks your good ship LOLLIPOP seems to have
worked thus far. Too bad that it isn't working for all that much
longer. The perpetrated cold-wars are clearly at risk of being exposed
for what they were. Our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush) is on his way
out as oil rich Muslims are kicking our butts. China is out-consuming
us and headed for establishing the one and only LSE-CM/ISS. ESA is
uncovering further evidence as to how newish and geothermally active
Venus actually is. The regular laws of physics being applied on behalf
of our moon or that of Venus are holding there own, while the results
are being entirely different than we've been informed by way of our NASA
and the likes of GOOGLE/NOVA.
Usenet and ROM/rec.org.mensa has been into playing with cult like fire,
and that's what makes this Earth into such an extra special planet of
liars telling us lies. Topic/author avoidance if not banishment seems
to have become their ultimate tool or save thy butt worth of a
damage-control method of e-book burning. No wonder there's such few if
any good topics within this wussy Mensa NG that's otherwise so deathly
afraid of it's own shadow.
JFK Speech on Secret Societies and Freedom of the Press
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlEqtaWpKEU
I'm sorry to say that I've totally agreed with JFK long before I'd
realized how totally snookered I'd been, and obviously this unfortunate
phase in my life was before JFK had gotten summarily nailed for being
such an honest human that actually gave a tinkers damn. No wonder
MI/NSA~NASA had to do what they did by allowing the extermination of
this rogue JFK of a lose cannon, in much the same manor as Jews allowed
one of their own kind to get put on a stick. How can we not make that
connection?
Can we hardly imagine upon discovering a more screwed up planet of
supposedly intelligent other/ET folks that are somewhat physically like
us? (I can't)... Perhaps that's exactly why Sirius had gotten rid of us
in the first place. (somewhat like a cosmic version of tossing out the
bad apples, or perhaps intentionally having established a sufficiently
remote and technologically isolated planet on behalf of accommodating
their mutated rejects)
Perhaps SEFORA will appreciate the fact that our moon's mascon influence
of 2e20 joules or 2.0395e19 kgf will actually mean a little something to
the likes of honest scientists and engineers.
If you're at all interested, I still have more than my fair share of
nifty topics and questions, plus as always a few spare lose cannons to
go along for the ride. I don't even mind sharing, and I'm otherwise
perfectly good with returning the flak with all the love and affection I
can muster.
-
Brad Guth
--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Brad Guth" |
|
| Title: Re: Top 1% OWNS MORE THAN bottom 90% |
03 Oct 2006 12:51:20 PM |
|
|
"schoenfeld.one" <schoenfeld.one@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158709919.894005.75820@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com
http://wakeupfromyourslumber.blogspot.com/2006/09/top-1-owns-more-than-bottom-90_19.html
Mailgate obviously doesn't much like this honest reply of mine.
I beliieve that it's actually of what's within the top 0.1% that's
pulling the vast bulk of our strings, and not of the "Top 1% OWNS
MORE THAN bottom 90%". Therefore it's 0.1% and the other is 99.9%.
There are absolutely terrific topics as represented by Ed Conrad's
"man old as coal" and otherwise those of my "Other Life existing/
coexisting on Venus" to behold, just not the least bit viable to
share and honestly discuss within this disinformation-R-us cesspool
of such brown-nosed infomercial science crapolla called ROM or much
of anything else within this Jewish dominated Usenet.
Perhaps folks that can not honestly share nor much less stand to hear
of yet another word about the truth should take this ongoing quest of
their's for topic/author stalking, bashing and banishing whatever's
the truth and nothing but the truth (aka book burning) up with the
supposed honest likes of SEFORA.
I mean to suggest, as far as I know the laws of physics really haven't
actually changed simply to suit our MI/NSA~NASA/Apollo ruse/sting of
our perpetrated cold wars, and of replicated science is still of what's
representing the best available truth in town, that is unless you folks
still can't believe your own eyes nor otherwise manage to deductively
connect a few of those dots.
I certainly wish those <http://www.sefora.org> scientists and engineers
the absolute very best of luck. JFK was once upon a time a fair enough
game player on behalf of science and technology, and he got summarily
rather dead for being such.
Their "National Agenda" starts off with way too much honesty and truth,
that is if that actual truth can ever be told. Their initial blogs via
Michael Stebbins are for the moment fairly empty, but lets see what
happens next. Too bad the likes of SETI/OSETI nor even Mensa doesn't
even remotely qualify.
Usenet truth certainly isn't worth squat, as lies beget lies and liars
spawn liars.
Earth truth isn't exactly possible because Mensa = Skull and Bones
Moon truth gets even so much worse yet because Mensa = Third Reich
Venus truth is entirely off their charts and still running itself
scared.
Sirius truth simply isn't allowed to exist, no matters what the
consequences.
Topic/author stalking, avoidance and/or banishment has been Usenet
status quo.
Excluding whatever evidence rocks your good ship LOLLIPOP seems to have
worked thus far. Too bad that it isn't working for all that much
longer. The perpetrated cold-wars are clearly at risk of being exposed
for what they were. Our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush) is on his way
out as oil rich Muslims are kicking our butts. China is out-consuming
us and headed for establishing the one and only LSE-CM/ISS. ESA is
uncovering further evidence as to how newish and geothermally active
Venus actually is. The regular laws of physics being applied on behalf
of our moon or that of Venus are holding there own, while the results
are being entirely different than we've been informed by way of our NASA
and the likes of GOOGLE/NOVA.
Usenet and ROM/rec.org.mensa has been into playing with cult like fire,
and that's what makes this Earth into such an extra special planet of
liars telling us lies. Topic/author avoidance if not banishment seems
to have become their ultimate tool or save thy butt worth of a
damage-control method of e-book burning. No wonder there's such few if
any good topics within this wussy Mensa NG that's otherwise so deathly
afraid of it's own shadow.
JFK Speech on Secret Societies and Freedom of the Press
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlEqtaWpKEU
I'm sorry to say that I've totally agreed with JFK long before I'd
realized how totally snookered I'd been, and obviously this unfortunate
phase in my life was before JFK had gotten summarily nailed for being
such an honest human that actually gave a tinkers damn. No wonder
MI/NSA~NASA had to do what they did by allowing the extermination of
this rogue JFK of a lose cannon, in much the same manor as Jews allowed
one of their own kind to get put on a stick. How can we not make that
connection?
Can we hardly imagine upon discovering a more screwed up planet of
supposedly intelligent other/ET folks that are somewhat physically like
us? (I can't)... Perhaps that's exactly why Sirius had gotten rid of us
in the first place. (somewhat like a cosmic version of tossing out the
bad apples, or perhaps intentionally having established a sufficiently
remote and technologically isolated planet on behalf of accommodating
their mutated rejects)
Perhaps SEFORA will appreciate the fact that our moon's mascon influence
of 2e20 joules or 2.0395e19 kgf will actually mean a little something to
the likes of honest scientists and engineers.
If any of you're at all interested, I still have more than my fair share
of nifty topics and questions, plus as always a few spare lose cannons
to go along for the ride. I don't even mind sharing, and I'm otherwise
perfectly good with returning the flak with all the love and affection I
can muster.
-
Brad Guth
--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
.
|
|
|
| User: "tomcat" |
|
| Title: Re: Top 1% OWNS MORE THAN bottom 90% |
03 Oct 2006 03:25:00 PM |
|
|
Brad Guth wrote:
"schoenfeld.one" <schoenfeld.one@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158709919.894005.75820@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com
http://wakeupfromyourslumber.blogspot.com/2006/09/top-1-owns-more-than-bottom-90_19.html
Mailgate obviously doesn't much like this honest reply of mine.
I beliieve that it's actually of what's within the top 0.1% that's
pulling the vast bulk of our strings, and not of the "Top 1% OWNS
MORE THAN bottom 90%". Therefore it's 0.1% and the other is 99.9%.
Actually, the top 1% owns about the same amount as 33%. This is quite
a bit of money but not quite as inequitable as 90%.
Ref:
http://72.14.209.104/search?q=cache:JW0restSZFkJ:research.stlouisfed.org/publications/review/97/07/9707jw.pdf+U.S.+wealth+percentages&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=1
If the top 1% has legally obtained their money then they deserve that
money. We have to have a system of carrots in a Capitalistic System.
This is why Capitalism works while other 'systems' don't.
tomcat
.
|
|
|
| User: "Brad Guth" |
|
| Title: Re: Top 1% OWNS MORE THAN bottom 90% |
04 Oct 2006 12:13:11 PM |
|
|
"tomcat" <jlavine@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:1159907100.253026.66420@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
Actually, the top 1% owns about the same amount as 33%. This is quite
a bit of money but not quite as inequitable as 90%.
What a total born-again wuss of a brown-nosed minion. You obviously
don't have to own everything in order to control damn near everything.
Why do you think such few Jews are so unusually wealthy and otherwise
control so much? Is Jewish DNA smarter and/or harder working than any
other DNA?
If the top 1% has legally obtained their money
You've got to be absolutely kidding. If 10% of the wealthy actually
earned their loot, I'd be impressed as hell.
We have to have a system of carrots in a Capitalistic System.
This is why Capitalism works while other 'systems' don't.
We have a highly corrupt system of born-again pagan bigots worth of
incest cloned liars that only begets more and more liars, just like
yourself and so many other dumbfounded minions of your Third Reich.
Makes you real proud being part of their borg collective, doesn't it.
-
Brad Guth
--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
.
|
|
|
| User: "Joseph Hertzlinger" |
|
| Title: Re: Top 1% OWNS MORE THAN bottom 90% |
06 Oct 2006 01:39:24 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 17:13:11 +0000 (UTC), Brad Guth
<bradguth@yahoo.com> wrote:
What a total born-again wuss of a brown-nosed minion. You obviously
don't have to own everything in order to control damn near everything.
Why do you think such few Jews are so unusually wealthy and otherwise
control so much? Is Jewish DNA smarter and/or harder working than any
other DNA?
I will treat your post with the seriousness it deserves.
I think we Jews have advanced our Plan for World Domination
sufficiently so that we can admit the truth: We're
extraterrestrials from Venus.
The supposed commandment to circumcise our males is camouflage.
Actually we don't grow foreskins at all. The "bris" is just an act.
We had to spread a rumor that circumcision has become more common
in order to disguise our growing numbers.
The kosher laws are also camouflage. We are biochemically unable to
digest pork. (In accordance with our tactic with circumcision we
had to make beef and chicken more popular than pork.) Similarly we
cannot digest meat and dairy simultaneously.
You can see more evidence of extraterrestrial influence in New York
-- the largest Jewish city.
First, we devised a civic culture in which most people are unable
to notice what's going on around them.
"Land anywhere. Central Park, anywhere. Nobody will care or
even notice." -- from Tips for Extraterrestrials in New York
(in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy series by Douglas
Adams)
We are also arranging the air and water around here to be more
suited to nonhuman needs. Carbon monoxide is a marvelous thing to
breathe if you have the right biochemistry. The water supply has
also been the subject of our attentions.
"Amphibious life forms from the Swulling, Noxios, or Nausalia
systems will be particularly interested in the East River
which is richer in the those lovely life-giving nutrients than
the finest and most virulent laboratory slimes." -- from Tips
for Extraterrestrials in New York (in The Hitchhiker's Guide
to the Galaxy series by Douglas Adams)
Most important of all, we made an alliance with Satan and sold him
office space at 666 Fifth Avenue. There are other buildings with a
street address of 666, but 666 Fifth Avenue in Manhattan is the
only one with 666 printed on the garbage cans in front, carved in
huge black letters over the entrance, and displayed in red glowing
symbols at the top visible for miles uptown at night.
New York is also the main ganglion of the media. We control the
networks and news magazines directly. We have also taken over Rush
Limbaugh and put him in charge of our Mind Control efforts. The EIB
building (One Penn Plaza) is modelled after the black monolith in
2001. From there, Limbaugh can beam our propaganda into millions of
"young skulls full of mush all across the fruited plain."
Our history might be informative. We designed the entire structure
of monotheism in order to get otherwise normal human beings to
help Destroy the Planet. (Just ask any pagan.) It was intended to
get people to devalue the natural world and treat it as disposable.
One of our agents slipped and confessed to being from another
planet ("My kingdom is not of this world.") so we had to repudiate
him. Nevertheless, his followers did some excellent work at
Destroying the Biosphere and otherwise paving the way for us.
A few decades ago an Aryan leader (someone named Hilter, of the
National Bocialist Party) realized what we were up to, so we had to
organize an emergency evacuation of the regions under his guidance.
(We commandeered Ernst Zundel's flying saucers.) It was difficult
to sneak into the U.S. unobserved but we managed. We were able to
explain away the discrepancies in the Census by creating a myth of
the "undercount." You never heard about an undercount when real
Americans ran the Census. We couldn't sneak in all at once so some
of us went to Mexico and came here gradually. That's the real
reason liberals oppose immigration controls.
Our plans for World Domination are not complete. We still have to
arrange an agreement with the Freemasons. In order to further that
goal we have inserted coded messages in the Talmud. It took the Masons
centuries to decode the message and they put their coded response in
the street map of Washington DC. We are still working on deciphering
it.
We have a highly corrupt system of born-again pagan bigots worth of
incest cloned liars that only begets more and more liars, just like
yourself and so many other dumbfounded minions of your Third Reich.
Makes you real proud being part of their borg collective, doesn't it.
Your life, as it has been, is now over. We shall take your biological,
technological, and cultural distinctiveness and make it part of our
own. Resistance is futile. Prepare to be assimilated. That's what the
Thorazine is for. (You've been skipping it, haven't you?)
--
http://hertzlinger.blogspot.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Brad Guth" |
|
| Title: Re: Top 1% OWNS MORE THAN bottom 90% |
07 Oct 2006 08:16:37 PM |
|
|
"Joseph Hertzlinger"
<jcyclespersecondlongisland@nine.reticulatedcom.com> wrote in message
news:wSmVg.3842$Lv3.2985@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 17:13:11 +0000 (UTC), Brad Guth
<bradguth@yahoo.com> wrote:
What a total born-again wuss of a brown-nosed minion. You obviously
don't have to own everything in order to control damn near everything.
Why do you think such few Jews are so unusually wealthy and otherwise
control so much? Is Jewish DNA smarter and/or harder working than any
other DNA?
I will treat your post with the seriousness it deserves.
I think we Jews have advanced our Plan for World Domination
sufficiently so that we can admit the truth: We're
extraterrestrials from Venus.
I have no problems with that of Jews arriving here from Venus. However,
where the heck did those little Dropas/Dzopas and of all those pesky
Muslims come from, or how about those extremely smart and rather Christ
like nice old Cathars that seriously ***** the Pope?
At least if Jews once upon a time having lived on Venus, you'd certainly
have to be a smart Jew. As I've said before, that the vast majority of
the Jews that I've known are smarter than average and wouldn't so much a
hurt a Muslim fly. How about yourself?
Your life, as it has been, is now over. We shall take your biological,
technological, and cultural distinctiveness and make it part of our
own. Resistance is futile. Prepare to be assimilated. That's what the
Thorazine is for. (You've been skipping it, haven't you?)
Silly Jew boy.
-
Brad Guth
--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Brad Guth" |
|
| Title: Re: Top 1% OWNS MORE THAN bottom 90% |
07 Oct 2006 08:33:20 PM |
|
|
"Joseph Hertzlinger"
<jcyclespersecondlongisland@nine.reticulatedcom.com> wrote in message
news:wSmVg.3842$Lv3.2985@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 17:13:11 +0000 (UTC), Brad Guth
<bradguth@yahoo.com> wrote:
What a total born-again wuss of a brown-nosed minion. You obviously
don't have to own everything in order to control damn near everything.
Why do you think such few Jews are so unusually wealthy and otherwise
control so much? Is Jewish DNA smarter and/or harder working than any
other DNA?
I will treat your post with the seriousness it deserves.
I think we Jews have advanced our Plan for World Domination
sufficiently so that we can admit the truth: We're
extraterrestrials from Venus.
Joseph Hertzlinger,
I have no actual problems with that of Jews arriving here from Venus.
However, where the heck did those little Dropas/Dzopas and of all those
pesky Muslims come from, or how about those extremely smart and rather
Christ like nice old Cathars that seriously ***** that Pope?
At least if Jews once upon a time having lived/coexisted on Venus, you'd
certainly have to be a sufficiently smart Jew. As I've said before,
that the vast majority of the Jews that I've known are smarter than
average and wouldn't so much a hurt a Muslim fly, much less having
allowed one of their own kind to being put on a stick. How about
yourself? (GOT CROSS; or are you simply waiting around for your
born-again pagan puppet GW Bush to accomplish all the dirty work of
exterminating those pesky Muslims?)
Your life, as it has been, is now over. We shall take your biological,
technological, and cultural distinctiveness and make it part of our
own. Resistance is futile. Prepare to be assimilated. That's what the
Thorazine is for. (You've been skipping it, haven't you?)
Being a silly Jewboy, arnt we.
-
Brad Guth
--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
.
|
|
|
| User: "tomcat" |
|
| Title: Re: Top 1% OWNS MORE THAN bottom 90% |
10 Oct 2006 08:50:23 PM |
|
|
Brad Guth wrote:
"Joseph Hertzlinger"
<jcyclespersecondlongisland@nine.reticulatedcom.com> wrote in message
news:wSmVg.3842$Lv3.2985@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 17:13:11 +0000 (UTC), Brad Guth
<bradguth@yahoo.com> wrote:
What a total born-again wuss of a brown-nosed minion. You obviously
don't have to own everything in order to control damn near everything.
Why do you think such few Jews are so unusually wealthy and otherwise
control so much? Is Jewish DNA smarter and/or harder working than any
other DNA?
I will treat your post with the seriousness it deserves.
I think we Jews have advanced our Plan for World Domination
sufficiently so that we can admit the truth: We're
extraterrestrials from Venus.
Joseph Hertzlinger,
I have no actual problems with that of Jews arriving here from Venus.
However, where the heck did those little Dropas/Dzopas and of all those
pesky Muslims come from, or how about those extremely smart and rather
Christ like nice old Cathars that seriously ***** that Pope?
At least if Jews once upon a time having lived/coexisted on Venus, you'd
certainly have to be a sufficiently smart Jew. As I've said before,
that the vast majority of the Jews that I've known are smarter than
average and wouldn't so much a hurt a Muslim fly, much less having
allowed one of their own kind to being put on a stick. How about
yourself? (GOT CROSS; or are you simply waiting around for your
born-again pagan puppet GW Bush to accomplish all the dirty work of
exterminating those pesky Muslims?)
Your life, as it has been, is now over. We shall take your biological,
technological, and cultural distinctiveness and make it part of our
own. Resistance is futile. Prepare to be assimilated. That's what the
Thorazine is for. (You've been skipping it, haven't you?)
Being a silly Jewboy, arnt we.
-
Brad Guth
--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
When you see the 'real' Aliens then both of you will realize that your
both really humans. I suspect that 'they' aren't really very far away.
They have made a point of 'visiting' Earth.
Our government has difficulty with Aliens precisely because it relies
on background checks to determine legitimacy. Aliens simply
'duplicate' the body of a perfectly respectable citizen and the
'Background Check' goes through perfectly for any degree of clearance.
Since most Earth nations discard their geniuses as 'aberrant', the
Aliens have a field day doing disinformation in our 'Black Programs'.
Geniuses are capable of detecting them. But as previously noted, there
aren't many of them in the DOD.
No wonder we hear about such strange goings on at Area 51. I suspect
the USAF is attempting to develop a deterrant against Alien Craft but
-- it is rumored -- that they actually have Aliens working on them
totally disguised as . . . humans.
Well, as I say, "Truth is stranger than fiction."
tomcat
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Brad Guth" |
|
| Title: Re: Top 1% OWNS MORE THAN bottom 90% |
12 Oct 2006 11:27:24 AM |
|
|
: tomcat;
: When you see the 'real' Aliens then both of you will realize that your
: both really humans. I suspect that 'they' aren't really very far
away.
: They have made a point of 'visiting' Earth.
: Our government has difficulty with Aliens precisely because it relies
: on background checks to determine legitimacy. Aliens simply
: 'duplicate' the body of a perfectly respectable citizen and the
: 'Background Check' goes through perfectly for any degree of clearance.
: Since most Earth nations discard their geniuses as 'aberrant', the
: Aliens have a field day doing disinformation in our 'Black Programs'.
: Geniuses are capable of detecting them. But as previously noted,
there
: aren't many of them in the DOD.
: No wonder we hear about such strange goings on at Area 51. I suspect
: the USAF is attempting to develop a deterrant against Alien Craft but
: -- it is rumored -- that they actually have Aliens working on them
: totally disguised as . . . humans.
: Well, as I say, "Truth is stranger than fiction."
Good grief 'tomcat', I basically agree with parts of your ET/Alien
analogy. However, get a fresh grip on your private parts and then try
real hard as to decide if you're ever going to help or not.
0.1% of humanity is basically in control of your pathetic mindset that's
all status quo or bust, and you're otherwise simply too far snookered
and summarily dumbfounded and otherwise deep in denial of your denial to
ever realize upon the total demise that you and much of humanity are in.
Even your own kind has bashed and otherwise tormented your soul. Are
you certain they haven't nailed your sorry butt to a cross?
-
Brad Guth
--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
.
|
|
|
| User: "tomcat" |
|
| Title: Re: Top 1% OWNS MORE THAN bottom 90% |
14 Oct 2006 06:18:59 AM |
|
|
Brad Guth wrote:
: tomcat;
: When you see the 'real' Aliens then both of you will realize that your
: both really humans. I suspect that 'they' aren't really very far
away.
: They have made a point of 'visiting' Earth.
: Our government has difficulty with Aliens precisely because it relies
: on background checks to determine legitimacy. Aliens simply
: 'duplicate' the body of a perfectly respectable citizen and the
: 'Background Check' goes through perfectly for any degree of clearance.
: Since most Earth nations discard their geniuses as 'aberrant', the
: Aliens have a field day doing disinformation in our 'Black Programs'.
: Geniuses are capable of detecting them. But as previously noted,
there
: aren't many of them in the DOD.
: No wonder we hear about such strange goings on at Area 51. I suspect
: the USAF is attempting to develop a deterrant against Alien Craft but
: -- it is rumored -- that they actually have Aliens working on them
: totally disguised as . . . humans.
: Well, as I say, "Truth is stranger than fiction."
Good grief 'tomcat', I basically agree with parts of your ET/Alien
analogy. However, get a fresh grip on your private parts and then try
real hard as to decide if you're ever going to help or not.
I am helping. I am doing everything I can to stop WWIII. I believe
that 'Aliens' are behind our World troubles. Their plan: get us to
fight each other then conquer the scanty remains.
0.1% of humanity is basically in control of your pathetic mindset that's
all status quo or bust, and you're otherwise simply too far snookered
and summarily dumbfounded and otherwise deep in denial of your denial to
ever realize upon the total demise that you and much of humanity are in.
Even your own kind has bashed and otherwise tormented your soul. Are
you certain they haven't nailed your sorry butt to a cross?
"I'm not sure if I'm nailed to a cross or not. I'm afraid to look
down." -- tomcat
It is a lack of morals that precedes wars and morals, religion, and
good manners have taken a turn for the worse. The outlook isn't good.
This 'lack of morals' is true for both sides of the current World
situation -- Atheism vs. Zealotry. It should be Christians and Muslims
instead.
tomcat
.
|
|
|
| User: "Brad Guth" |
|
| Title: Re: Top 1% OWNS MORE THAN bottom 90% |
14 Oct 2006 07:50:48 AM |
|
|
"tomcat" <jlavine@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:1160824739.293098.314830@f16g2000cwb.googlegroups.com
I am helping. I am doing everything I can to stop WWIII. I believe
that 'Aliens' are behind our World troubles. Their plan: get us to
fight each other then conquer the scanty remains.
You are not actually helping because, you've got it so badly confused,
in that our resident warlord GW Bush, ***** Cheney and Henry Kissinger
are NOT 'Aliens'. These folks are just plain and simple sick bastards
of the worse possible pagan kind, and it's their minions exactly like
yourself that are so snookered and/or dumbfounded that you can't even
tell the difference between an all american SOB and that of a smart ET.
0.1% of humanity is basically in control of your pathetic mindset that's
all status quo or bust, and you're otherwise simply too far snookered
and summarily dumbfounded and otherwise deep in denial of your denial to
ever realize upon the total demise that you and much of humanity are in.
Even your own kind has bashed and otherwise tormented your soul. Are
you certain they haven't nailed your sorry butt to a cross?
"I'm not sure if I'm nailed to a cross or not. I'm afraid to look
down." -- tomcat
Then whatever you do don't look down, because it just might ruin your
entire day.
It is a lack of morals that precedes wars and morals, religion, and
good manners have taken a turn for the worse. The outlook isn't good.
Obviously ETs must have strong morals and a viable religion that's more
logical and fair minded, therefore ETs must have remorse and are
therefore well past the point of their having to make war by way of
lying or by otherwise inventing WMD that never existed. However, in the
past you've certainly supported such liars and the lies upon lies
they've perpetrated, and that's entirely without having involved any of
those pesky ETs.
This 'lack of morals' is true for both sides of the current World
situation -- Atheism vs. Zealotry. It should be Christians and Muslims
instead.
We certainly seem to have more than our fair share of Zealots, and
that's a real problem isn't it? (perhaps that's part of your ET plot all
along, as to keep infecting Earth with those nasty Zealots)
We don't seem to have enough honest souls that simply care a tinker's
damn about one another, much less about the other vastly more important
forms of life (from diatoms on up), nor that of our badly failing
environment, all because we're all to busy at pillaging and raping
mother Earth for all she's worth, and otherwise being such pagan
born-again liars at killing off one another for sport.
Stop supporting your mainstream status quo is what's going to help the
most at bringing about an end to their form of terrorism that sucks and
blows. Focus upon what's technically doable and directly beneficial to
the lower 99.9% of humanity, and otherwise screw the top 0.1% that buy
their way into and through every fiasco with our hard earned loot and
blood.
-
Brad Guth
--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Joseph Hertzlinger" |
|
| Title: Re: Top 1% OWNS MORE THAN bottom 90% |
03 Oct 2006 11:37:52 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 17:51:20 +0000 (UTC), Brad Guth
<bradguth@yahoo.com> wrote:
There are absolutely terrific topics as represented by Ed Conrad's
"man old as coal" and otherwise those of my "Other Life existing/
coexisting on Venus" to behold, just not the least bit viable to
share and honestly discuss within this disinformation-R-us cesspool
of such brown-nosed infomercial science crapolla called ROM or much
of anything else within this Jewish dominated Usenet.
From http://timblair.blogspot.com/
|VODKAPUNDIT - whose writing about his feisty, chain-smoking
|grandmother, and her recent death, has been a privilege to read -
|wondered a few days ago:
|
| | Which blogger was it who claimed all forms of idiocy were merging
| | into one huge glob of stupid?
|
|It was me, but the evidence of idiocy-merging is so obvious that many
|others probably noticed it earlier. As the process continues, the
|various disparate yet overlapping idiot groups will likely soon form
|a united global coalition: Humanity's Associated Movements Against
|Stuff.
|
|Death to HAMAS!
--
The above did not appear at http://hertzlinger.blogspot.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Brad Guth" |
|
| Title: Re: Top 1% OWNS MORE THAN bottom 90% |
04 Oct 2006 12:15:59 PM |
|
|
"Joseph Hertzlinger"
<jcyclespersecondlongisland@nine.reticulatedcom.com> wrote in message
news:AUGUg.4772$Y24.2504@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net
|Death to HAMAS!
My goodness, arnt we having a bad God day.
-
Brad Guth
--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob Kolker" |
|
| Title: Re: Top 1% OWNS MORE THAN bottom 90% |
19 Sep 2006 09:52:50 PM |
|
|
wrote:
http://wakeupfromyourslumber.blogspot.com/2006/09/top-1-owns-more-than-bottom-90_19.html
So what else is new? This has always been the case. Most people are
dunces and ballast. Very few have the ability to create wealth and fewer
still the ambition to make it happen. Life is like a bottle of milk. The
cream rises to the top.
Bob Kolker
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rock Brentwood" |
|
| Title: Re: Top 1% OWNS MORE THAN bottom 90% |
25 Sep 2006 05:57:05 PM |
|
|
Bob Kolker wrote:
Life is like a ...
....pyramid scheme. The first in or the lucky get to the top and slam
the door behind. Nobody else gets in, no matter what their
qualification, except by breaking down the door and (if need be)
clearing out the room of those already inside; or else tearing down the
house, itself.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sammybaby" |
|
| Title: Re: Top 1% OWNS MORE THAN bottom 90% |
14 Oct 2006 06:23:33 AM |
|
|
Bob Kolker wrote:
schoenfeld.one@gmail.com wrote:
http://wakeupfromyourslumber.blogspot.com/2006/09/top-1-owns-more-than-bottom-90_19.html
So what else is new? This has always been the case.
No, the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer.
.
|
|
|
| User: "miles" |
|
| Title: Re: Top 1% OWNS MORE THAN bottom 90% |
14 Oct 2006 07:16:56 AM |
|
|
Sammybaby wrote:
Bob Kolker wrote:
schoenfeld.one@gmail.com wrote:
http://wakeupfromyourslumber.blogspot.com/2006/09/top-1-owns-more-than-bottom-90_19.html
So what else is new? This has always been the case.
No, the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer.
The poor are improving their standard of living as well.
The liberals methods involve bringing down the top rather than bringing
up the bottom. Great plan.
.
|
|
|
| User: "=?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=80=A6Relf?=" |
|
| Title: There are endless ways to have a | | | | | |
