Science > Physics > Topsy Turvy: In neutrons and protons, quarks take wrong turns
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Sam Wormley" |
| Date: |
03 Jan 2004 09:02:14 AM |
| Object: |
Topsy Turvy: In neutrons and protons, quarks take wrong turns |
Ref: http://www.sciencenews.org/20040103/fob1.asp
Topsy Turvy: In neutrons and protons, quarks take wrong turns
Revved-up particles, namely quarks, spinning inside neutrons in the
opposite direction to that of the neutrons themselves, challenge the
prevailing model of how quarks behave.
See: http://www.sciencenews.org/20040103/fob1.asp
.
|
|
| User: "S. Enterprize Company" |
|
| Title: Re: Topsy Turvy: In neutrons and protons, quarks take wrong turns |
04 Jan 2004 02:27:42 AM |
|
|
Ref: http://www.sciencenews.org/20040103/fob1.asp
Topsy Turvy: In neutrons and protons, quarks take wrong turns
Revved-up particles, namely quarks, spinning inside neutrons in the
opposite direction to that of the neutrons themselves, challenge the
prevailing model of how quarks behave.
See: http://www.sciencenews.org/20040103/fob1.asp
What's wrong Swormley The QM and Standard Model starting to look wrong to
everyone? They are just starting to describe the Smart Model.
Cranks Of Physics
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/CRANKS.html
Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "ThomasL283" |
|
| Title: Re: Topsy Turvy: In neutrons and protons, quarks take wrong turns |
03 Jan 2004 07:04:46 PM |
|
|
Sam Wormley
Date: 1/3/2004 7:02 AM Pacific Standard Time
Wrote in:
Message-id: <3FF6D96F.652976F2@mchsi.com>
Ref: http://www.sciencenews.org/20040103/fob1.asp
Topsy Turvy: In neutrons and protons, quarks take wrong turns
Revved-up particles, namely quarks, spinning inside neutrons in the
opposite direction to that of the neutrons themselves, challenge the
prevailing model of how quarks behave.
Sam, why do you continue to think the quark model is the cats meow after the
models many long standing (40 year old) defaults, unsolvable by the finest
minds available.
Any thinking person would conclude that the quark model is finally taking on
the dimensions of a fraud, and should be abandoned.
Forever unanswered quark questions.
The source for theoretical quark spin?
How (why) are the theoretical u,d,s,t,b quarks constructed from energy?
What is the source for the theoretical quarks unprecedented fractional
(+-1/3) (+-2/3) charges?
Why can't the quark proton and neutron model give (n-1H) energy, so important
in nuclear physics?
Why can't the quark model give proton and neutron mass ratios and magnetic
moments?
Why can't the quark model for the proton and neutron allow calculating the
binding energy of the deuteron?
Regards: Tom:
Tom Lockyer (77 and retired)
"If you want to do the impossible, don't hire an expert because he knows
it can't be done." Henry Ford.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: Topsy Turvy: In neutrons and protons, quarks take wrong turns |
03 Jan 2004 11:15:58 PM |
|
|
ThomasL283 wrote:
Sam, why do you continue to think the quark model is the cats meow after the
models many long standing (40 year old) defaults, unsolvable by the finest
minds available.
Tom--The quark model successes
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22quark+model%22+successes
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Potter" |
|
| Title: Re: Topsy Turvy: In neutrons and protons, quarks take wrong turns |
04 Jan 2004 06:00:45 AM |
|
|
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:3FF7A18B.4D74EF66@mchsi.com...
ThomasL283 wrote:
Sam, why do you continue to think the quark model is the cats meow after
the
models many long standing (40 year old) defaults, unsolvable by the
finest
minds available.
Tom--The quark model successes
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22quark+model%22+successes
Google hits "quark model" successes = 919
Google hits "bohr model" successes = 243
Google hits "maxwell model" successes = 17
I think what Wormly is trying to say,
is that the newer the model,
and the less cost-effective it is,
the more Google hits you will get touting its' "successes".
I suspect that the folks who are interested in
viable and cost-effective models of reality
use those that work best,
and that the people who are interested in
looting the taxpayers,
use new models that lend themselves to obfuscation.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
