Unbound particles and energy?



 Science > Physics > Unbound particles and energy?

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Nick"
Date: 28 Oct 2005 07:39:42 PM
Object: Unbound particles and energy?
Bound particles can only absorb and radiate at definite frequencies.
Instead of "free" particles not being able to absorb and emit at all
what if they are not limited in the frequencies they can absorb and
emit?
What if free particles are free to take in all frequencies of light?
And radiate random?
Maybe there is evidence to disprove this?
.

User: "Henry Haapalainen"

Title: Re: Unbound particles and energy? 29 Oct 2005 05:33:36 PM
"Nick" <macromitch@yahoo.com> kirjoitti viestissä
news:1130546382.119512.31840@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Bound particles can only absorb and radiate at definite frequencies.
Instead of "free" particles not being able to absorb and emit at all
what if they are not limited in the frequencies they can absorb and
emit?

What if free particles are free to take in all frequencies of light?
And radiate random?

Maybe there is evidence to disprove this?

Free particles can't do those things if they do not exist.
Henry Haapalainen
Falling space theory http://www.wakkanet.fi/~fields/
.

User: "Eric Gisse"

Title: Re: Unbound particles and energy? 28 Oct 2005 08:40:29 PM
Nick wrote:

Bound particles can only absorb and radiate at definite frequencies.
Instead of "free" particles not being able to absorb and emit at all
what if they are not limited in the frequencies they can absorb and
emit?

What if free particles are free to take in all frequencies of light?
And radiate random?

Maybe there is evidence to disprove this?

Quantum mechanics.
Familiarize yourself with modern physics, it would help.
.
User: "Nick"

Title: Re: Unbound particles and energy? 28 Oct 2005 09:35:48 PM
QM is only a theory gasy. How can it prove anything?
What if it is the opposite: that free particles
can absorb any frequency? How would this
physics idea be disproven?
.
User: "Eric Gisse"

Title: Re: Unbound particles and energy? 28 Oct 2005 11:58:33 PM
Nick wrote:

QM is only a theory gasy. How can it prove anything?

What if it is the opposite: that free particles
can absorb any frequency? How would this
physics idea be disproven?

By reading the literature.
Have you even had a math class?
All you do is come here and spout nonsense.
.



User: ""

Title: Re: Unbound particles and energy? 28 Oct 2005 08:15:17 PM
Nick wrote:

Bound particles can only absorb and radiate at definite frequencies.
Instead of "free" particles not being able to absorb and emit at all
what if they are not limited in the frequencies they can absorb and
emit?

What if free particles are free to take in all frequencies of light?
And radiate random?

Maybe there is evidence to disprove this?

xxein: Who says that free particles behave differently? Can you grab
a free particle and say how it behaves under the same test?
.
User: "Nick"

Title: Re: Unbound particles and energy? 28 Oct 2005 08:17:26 PM
Xxein?
I know I don't have a complete physic. Who does?
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Unbound particles and energy? 28 Oct 2005 08:43:00 PM
Nick wrote:

Xxein?
I know I don't have a complete physic. Who does?

xxein: Use that as an objective starting point and only build on
observation/experiment within that frame work and see that things are
relative.
It should become clearer (eventually) that the relativity of our
observations are just that (local and subjective).
Can't say more right now. Wilma, generator, gasoline.
.
User: "Nick"

Title: Re: Unbound particles and energy? 28 Oct 2005 09:32:27 PM
You treat relatives as if they're absolute xxein.
I say relatives owe their existence to the absolutes. And I can show
you.
.
User: "Mark Martin"

Title: Re: Unbound particles and energy? 28 Oct 2005 09:34:00 PM
Nick wrote:

You treat relatives as if they're absolute xxein.

I say relatives owe their existence to the absolutes. And I can show
you.

That'll be the day.
-Mark Martin
.
User: "Nick"

Title: Re: Unbound particles and energy? 28 Oct 2005 09:38:57 PM
I can show xxein martin. You are different story!!!
.







  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Unbound particles and energy
Can unbound electrons absorb/emit light?
bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy
Absorption of light by bound and unbound electrons
OT: Nitrogen Unbound: New reaction breaks strong chemical link
Re: Bullwinkle Unbound
The Nature Of Life As Seen From Earth - Life Energy Particles - Perception And Motion {HRI 20010829-pi8-V1.2} - (part issue 8 Version 1.2 on 18 Aug 2005)
Dark energy, expansion, and nuclear particles
The Nature Of Life As Seen From Earth - Life Energy Particles And Your Body {HRI 20010829-pi7-V2.0} - (part issue 7 Version 2.0 on 16 Aug 2005)
Equations for energy and momentum, valid for all particles.
The kinetic energy of two interacting particles
Potential energy of individual particles.
Re: The kinetic energy of two interacting particles
The Nature Of Life As Seen From Earth - Life Energy Particles - Perception At A Distance {HRI 20010829-pi9-V2.0} - (part issue 9 Version 2.0 on 21 Aug 2005)
The Story of Particles and Relativity(special , general)
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER