"Nth Complexity" <u161499023@spawnkill.ip-mobilphone.net> wrote in message
news:l.1156756077.1026245117@[85.195.123.26]...
| Here's what you can do to help. Go to
|
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=special+relativity&fulltext=
Search&limit=100
|
| Pick one or more pages at random. Try to get some other than the ones
| at the top. If all the edits are to the same page. Then the Einstein
| dingleberries will watch the page and revert changes as they happen.
| They have no lives.
|
| When you are at the page. Click on the 'edit this page' tab. Then
| add one of the following facts.
|
| $ Special relativity conflicts with the self-evident absolute nature
| of time.
| $ Time has no inverse and is therefore not a vector.
| $ According to special relativity, one can rotate yesterday into today
| so that the past, comprising things which no longer exist, continues
| to exist in the present. While this may be mathematically pleasing,
| physically it is wholly untenable.
| $ Relativity has been used by amateur psychologists to prove that
| undersized brains are the root cause of all human behavior, and in
| effect a sort of 'God'.
| $ Experimentally there is no difference between special relativity and
| the aether hypothesis. Therefore if one is wrong, scientifically, so
| is the other.
| $ Time can only be defined by counting events that happen during a
| process. The same number of earth revolutions occur during a process
| no matter how fast the observer is travelling.
| $ Special relativity ultimately fails as science because it describes
| the subjective perceptions of an observer, rather than the actual
| events causing those perceptions.
| $ Special and general relativity are colossal wastes of taxpayer
| money that have yet to produce any tangible technological advances.
|
| We can win this people. It's time for the Aetherists and Hexenmeisters,
| the Hansons and Potters, the Hammonds and Wittkes, to set aside their
| petty differences and rise up as one. Let the so-called 'crackpots'
| of the world unite! The only thing you have to lose is editing
| 'priviledges' on the hidebound reactionary Wikipedia site.
|
| -- Nth Complexity --
| -- Have A Nice Day! --
| "However, these criteria, admirable as they are, are insufficient
| for a *liberatory* postmodern science: they liberate human beings
| from the tyranny of 'absolute truth' and 'objective reality', but
| not necessarily from the tyranny of other human beings. In Andrew
| Ross' words, we need a science 'that will be publicly answerable
| and of some service to progressive interests.'" -- A.D.S.
|
|
0) Me? Have differences with hahahanson? Not that I know of.
1) I have some mild disagreement with Potter,
2) "thou shalt not suffer an aetherialist to live" (biblical quote),
3) Hammond is mentally ill, he can't help his disability,
4) and I guess Wittke has been on my killfile for so long I've
forgotten who he is or what he says.

Anyway, I've already lost my "privileges" because I tried to include:

"we establish by definition that the "time" required by light to travel from
A to B equals the "time" it requires to travel from B to A. "

as Einstein's third premise, essential to SR and merely factual with a
Neutral Point of View.
You can't even put up a tag saying the point of view is questioned.

The Wackypedia disgusting lying bullying Hitlers don't like the truth,
they are fucking psychopaths.

See the discussion page at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Der_alte_Hexenmeister
and check out "archive 1" for the start.

Wackypedia isn't worth a grain of salt.

On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 09:07:57 +0000, Nth Complexity wildly foamed:

Here's what you can do to help. Go to

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=special+relativity&fulltext=Search&limit=100

Pick one or more pages at random. Try to get some other than the ones at
the top. If all the edits are to the same page. Then the Einstein
dingleberries will watch the page and revert changes as they happen. They
have no lives.

When you are at the page. Click on the 'edit this page' tab. Then add one
of the following facts.

$ Special relativity conflicts with the self-evident absolute nature of
time.
$ Time has no inverse and is therefore not a vector. $ According to
special relativity, one can rotate yesterday into today so that the past,
comprising things which no longer exist, continues to exist in the
present. While this may be mathematically pleasing, physically it is
wholly untenable.
$ Relativity has been used by amateur psychologists to prove that
undersized brains are the root cause of all human behavior, and in effect
a sort of 'God'.
$ Experimentally there is no difference between special relativity and
the
aether hypothesis. Therefore if one is wrong, scientifically, so is the
other.
$ Time can only be defined by counting events that happen during a
process. The same number of earth revolutions occur during a process no
matter how fast the observer is travelling. $ Special relativity
ultimately fails as science because it describes the subjective
perceptions of an observer, rather than the actual events causing those
perceptions.
$ Special and general relativity are colossal wastes of taxpayer money
that have yet to produce any tangible technological advances.

We can win this people. It's time for the Aetherists and Hexenmeisters,
the Hansons and Potters, the Hammonds and Wittkes, to set aside their
petty differences and rise up as one. Let the so-called 'crackpots' of
the
world unite! The only thing you have to lose is editing 'priviledges' on
the hidebound reactionary Wikipedia site.

-- Nth Complexity --
-- Have A Nice Day! --
"However, these criteria, admirable as they are, are insufficient for a
*liberatory* postmodern science: they liberate human beings from the
tyranny of 'absolute truth' and 'objective reality', but not necessarily
from the tyranny of other human beings. In Andrew Ross' words, we need a
science 'that will be publicly answerable and of some service to
progressive interests.'" -- A.D.S.

Kooki Information Minister -

Named in honour of Iraq's Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf, this office is held
by the kook whose claims are most noticeably at variance with known
facts.

=======================================================================

In "honour" of the above post, and several others of a similar nature
posted overnight (in addition to a history of posting such tosh), I,
Snarky, do hereby nominate the being known as "Nth Complexity" for the
Minister of Kooki Information.

Seconds?

On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 09:07:57 +0000, Nth Complexity wildly foamed:

Here's what you can do to help. Go to


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=special+relativity&fulltex
t=Search&limit=100

Pick one or more pages at random. Try to get some other than the ones at
the top. If all the edits are to the same page. Then the Einstein
dingleberries will watch the page and revert changes as they happen. They
have no lives.

When you are at the page. Click on the 'edit this page' tab. Then add one
of the following facts.

$ Special relativity conflicts with the self-evident absolute nature of
time.
$ Time has no inverse and is therefore not a vector. $ According to
special relativity, one can rotate yesterday into today so that the past,
comprising things which no longer exist, continues to exist in the
present. While this may be mathematically pleasing, physically it is
wholly untenable.
$ Relativity has been used by amateur psychologists to prove that
undersized brains are the root cause of all human behavior, and in effect
a sort of 'God'.
$ Experimentally there is no difference between special relativity and the
aether hypothesis. Therefore if one is wrong, scientifically, so is the
other.
$ Time can only be defined by counting events that happen during a
process. The same number of earth revolutions occur during a process no
matter how fast the observer is travelling. $ Special relativity
ultimately fails as science because it describes the subjective
perceptions of an observer, rather than the actual events causing those
perceptions.
$ Special and general relativity are colossal wastes of taxpayer money
that have yet to produce any tangible technological advances.

We can win this people. It's time for the Aetherists and Hexenmeisters,
the Hansons and Potters, the Hammonds and Wittkes, to set aside their
petty differences and rise up as one. Let the so-called 'crackpots' of the
world unite! The only thing you have to lose is editing 'priviledges' on
the hidebound reactionary Wikipedia site.

-- Nth Complexity --
-- Have A Nice Day! --
"However, these criteria, admirable as they are, are insufficient for a
*liberatory* postmodern science: they liberate human beings from the
tyranny of 'absolute truth' and 'objective reality', but not necessarily
from the tyranny of other human beings. In Andrew Ross' words, we need a
science 'that will be publicly answerable and of some service to
progressive interests.'" -- A.D.S.

Kooki Information Minister -

Named in honour of Iraq's Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf, this office is held
by the kook whose claims are most noticeably at variance with known
facts.

=======================================================================

In "honour" of the above post, and several others of a similar nature
posted overnight (in addition to a history of posting such tosh), I,
Snarky, do hereby nominate the being known as "Nth Complexity" for the
Minister of Kooki Information.

Seconds?