| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Brad Guth" |
| Date: |
04 May 2007 12:36:02 PM |
| Object: |
Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based |
Why is sci.physics, alt.astronomy and so many other public groups
becoming so anti-think-tank, and otherwise so robo/stealth moderated to
death?
Is it simply because us few honest folks don't happen to like our
resident LLPOF warlord(Jeb Bush)?
How the hell can the likes of Scott Miller close out and/or banish a
given topic that's not even his to begin with?
As having been recently pointed out by G=EMC^2 Glazier's "America's
Next revolution"
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.astronomy/browse_frm/thread/da393cade9ceaa88/1cf0761ca3e283b5?hl=en#1cf0761ca3e283b5
That "low wit parrot" of a pesky Mafia factor is something deeply rooted
within Usenet, and it's being run rather nicely as a faith-based black
hole that's continually sucking the rest of us into their event horizon
by the likes of Scott Miller, that's clearly an insider spook/mole or
whatever that's fully intent upon keeping the likes of our pesky replies
of honestly deductive thoughts and especially our truth seeking
questions outside of and/or excluded from as many Usenet groups as
possible.
I'm still a bit sorry that I even had to bother doing it this way, but
our warm and fuzzy Scott Miller(aka "low wit parrot") of a rusemaster
and the like have been intentionally diverting and/or keeping the likes
of my replies entirely out of their alt.astronomy Usenet, thereby
excluded from their hijacked topic stack, along with otherwise sharing
their latest robo GOOGLE/Usenet system message being:
"There are no more messages on this topic. All messages in this topic
may have expired or been deleted."
That's certainly a new one, especially interesting when applied to a
fresh/new topic that I'd just posted. Silly old me, I didn't know such
a public Usenet was getting remote controlled by those with such hidden
agendas and ulterior motives (aka Third Reich and/or OT/Jewish mindset
worthy).
and/or we keep getting the other pesky message: "Your account or
Internet address has exceeded our posting limit at this time, please try
again later." In other words, our topics and replies are running at too
much bandwidth. (sorry about that)
Due to such robo-moderation that's seriously running amuck, you'll have
to go to this secondary topic if you want to read my last reply to
G=EMC^2 Glazier's "What if (on White Dwarfs)"
Otherwise, keep using GOOGLE/Usenet or something other than your
filtered PC Usenet reader has to offer, in order to check up on what's
otherwise happening to your topics in the public eye, as it's actually
getting very cloak and dagger Mafia worthy, the likes of e-whacking us
out of their picture.
Scott Miller: What if (on White Dwarfs)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/3769b2961bbfc213/7939b2ceb5dfd578?hl=en#7939b2ceb5dfd578
What if (on White Dwarfs) / by G=EMC^2 Glazier (the original topic)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.astronomy/browse_frm/thread/ccdfca1d336f5a08?scoring=d&hl=en
I may even have to post a few other secondary topics for the very same
pesky reasons. So, stay tuned in for the latest news from the weird but
honest worlds of Guth and G=EMC^2 Glazier.
-
Brad Guth
--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
.
|
|
| User: "BradGuth" |
|
| Title: Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based |
05 May 2007 09:15:43 AM |
|
|
As further proof/evidence of ulterior motives and hidden agendas, I
offer:
Discussion subject changed to "EVIDENCE: Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-
Truth/Faith-Based" by Art Deco
I wish folks (good and bad) would stop hijacking by way of their
renaming these topics, as it's bad enough our having been topic/author
stalked and bashed without our having to search for the original topic
or otherwise having to deal with Usenet cesspool groups (such as
alt.fan.art-bell, alt.usenet.kooks) that have nothing but ulterior
motives and hidden agendas.
-
Brad Guth
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "BradGuth" |
|
| Title: Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based |
06 May 2007 06:38:55 PM |
|
|
As long as you can exclude, skew and/or otherwise hide the truth, why
not go all the way?
However, I tend to favor that a great many of the old guard butts and
of their incest cloned replacement butts need to be retroactively
kicked, and then some. Of course, our special-interest groups of
those smart Third Reich and their dumbfounded Jewish minions, as for
their having used those extra special conditional laws of physics, is
what supposedly had us walking moonsuit butt naked upon our physically
dark, terribly reactive, more than a touch salty and otherwise
absolutely nasty IR/FIR roasting everything in sight to death moon,
whereas those nifty laws of their conditional physics and hocus-pocus
of fly-by-rocket expertise that oddly still can't be demonstrated, had
actually prevented any detectable Kodak film damage, excluded most of
whatever human DNA damage and otherwise kept that big old and nearby
Venus from ever being anywhere in sight.
Perhaps those spendy folks of GR can further explain such odd physics,
as though running so far amuck while merely a little off-world.
The General Relativity gang are circling the wagons / by Tom Potter
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/cc57b2d799e60438/343c46b98d7c47f4?lnk=gst&q=General+Relativity+gang+&rnum=1#343c46b98d7c47f4
What an absolutely sorry mindfield or gauntlet of mainstream status
quo or bust damage-control, of such horrific flak tossing over
protecting their precious all-or-nothing GR butts.
Even "tj Frazir" offers a few too many truthful words of wisdom.
I'm fairly certain, if we gave those nice GR folks an extra trillion
in tax free loot per year, they'd spend every last cent and they still
would not be happy campers, nor would we have accomplished clean
fusion energy to burn (sort of speak), not even within the next
decade.
-
Brad Guth
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "BradGuth" |
|
| Title: Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based |
05 May 2007 02:10:50 PM |
|
|
Besides the likes of mailgate.org being totally news obstructive, as
otherwise being client specific filtered and/or as having so often
excluded most all that rocks their public infomercial spewing boat, as
further proof/evidence of the ulterior motives and hidden agendas
imposed by those in charge of keeping those mainstream status quo lids
on tight, and of that which keeps their grand ruse/sting of the
century in full swing, I offer:
Discussion subject changed to "EVIDENCE: Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-
Truth/Faith-Based" by Art Deco
These mainstream status quo rusemasters also pounced upon "How Did the
Universe Survive the Big Bang?" as having been renamed a dozen times,
and only worse off hijackings imposed upon my topics. See for
yourself how many times an original topic gets hijacked by getting
renamed and/or by way of getting dragged into cesspool groups of
clowns taking an extra bite. Since Usenet insiders/controllers have
intentionally provided this hijacking capability, and having sustained
and even rewarded it usage, as their status quo norm of damage
control, is why there's little chance of honest folks sharing much of
anything that matters to the public that's not willing to filter out
the gauntlet of mainstream flak that's without question far more faith-
based and/or politically motivated then not.
Most topic renaming has been intentionally made so extensive that it
totally obscures and/or skews whatever the original author intended.
This clown tactic is not by any mistake, nor is it being addressed by
those Usenet insiders capable of having prevented such actions by
anyone other than the originating author (if even allowing that much).
I foolishly wish usenet folks (the good, the bad and the downright
ugly) would stop such hijacking by way of their renaming these topics,
as it's bad enough our having been topic/author stalked and bashed
without our having to continually search for the original topic or
otherwise having to deal with their special Usenet cesspool groups
(such as alt.fan.art-bell and alt.usenet.kooks) that have nothing but
ulterior motives and hidden agendas to offer.
These individuals or rather borg collectives of mostly Old Testament
or some other faith-based and/or political skewed mindset continually
claim as being total atheist and otherwise without any political or
big business affiliations, but we all honestly know for a bloody fact
that's a lie, and otherwise we know that these topic/author stalking
folks are more or less official government spooks/moles or having been
working on behalf of such without an honest speck of remorse, whereas
most having been so dishonest that they simply do not exist as real
people (more so as anti-truth and otherwise somewhat sleeper cell or
cult worthy, I'd say).
Notice how the Usenet index of whatever's search topic relevant (such
as a search for Brad Guth) and otherwise as "sorted by date" are
usually skewed far away from what's honestly the case. In other
words, usenet is very much humanly moderated in favor of their
promoting and/or sustaining whatever's their faith-based or political
agenda of the day. There's absolutely nothing fair about usenet, that
is unless you're one of those that happen to think what the Third
Reich had going was fair.
-
Brad Guth
.
|
|
|
| User: "Phineas T Puddleduck" |
|
| Title: Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based |
05 May 2007 02:16:23 PM |
|
|
In article <1178392249.999293.262450@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
BradGuth <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote:
The newest saucerhead goes off on another rant!
Besides the likes of mailgate.org being totally news obstructive, as
otherwise being client specific filtered and/or as having so often
excluded most all that rocks their public infomercial spewing boat, as
further proof/evidence of the ulterior motives and hidden agendas
imposed by those in charge of keeping those mainstream status quo lids
on tight, and of that which keeps their grand ruse/sting of the
century in full swing, I offer:
Discussion subject changed to "EVIDENCE: Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-
Truth/Faith-Based" by Art Deco
These mainstream status quo rusemasters also pounced upon "How Did the
Universe Survive the Big Bang?" as having been renamed a dozen times,
and only worse off hijackings imposed upon my topics. See for
yourself how many times an original topic gets hijacked by getting
renamed and/or by way of getting dragged into cesspool groups of
clowns taking an extra bite. Since Usenet insiders/controllers have
intentionally provided this hijacking capability, and having sustained
and even rewarded it usage, as their status quo norm of damage
control, is why there's little chance of honest folks sharing much of
anything that matters to the public that's not willing to filter out
the gauntlet of mainstream flak that's without question far more faith-
based and/or politically motivated then not.
Most topic renaming has been intentionally made so extensive that it
totally obscures and/or skews whatever the original author intended.
This clown tactic is not by any mistake, nor is it being addressed by
those Usenet insiders capable of having prevented such actions by
anyone other than the originating author (if even allowing that much).
I foolishly wish usenet folks (the good, the bad and the downright
ugly) would stop such hijacking by way of their renaming these topics,
as it's bad enough our having been topic/author stalked and bashed
without our having to continually search for the original topic or
otherwise having to deal with their special Usenet cesspool groups
(such as alt.fan.art-bell and alt.usenet.kooks) that have nothing but
ulterior motives and hidden agendas to offer.
These individuals or rather borg collectives of mostly Old Testament
or some other faith-based and/or political skewed mindset continually
claim as being total atheist and otherwise without any political or
big business affiliations, but we all honestly know for a bloody fact
that's a lie, and otherwise we know that these topic/author stalking
folks are more or less official government spooks/moles or having been
working on behalf of such without an honest speck of remorse, whereas
most having been so dishonest that they simply do not exist as real
people (more so as anti-truth and otherwise somewhat sleeper cell or
cult worthy, I'd say).
Notice how the Usenet index of whatever's search topic relevant (such
as a search for Brad Guth) and otherwise as "sorted by date" are
usually skewed far away from what's honestly the case. In other
words, usenet is very much humanly moderated in favor of their
promoting and/or sustaining whatever's their faith-based or political
agenda of the day. There's absolutely nothing fair about usenet, that
is unless you're one of those that happen to think what the Third
Reich had going was fair.
--
Sacred keeper of the Hollow Sphere, and the space within the Coffee Boy
singularity.
COOSN-174-07-82116: alt.astronomy's favourite poster (from a survey taken
of the saucerhead high command).
.
|
|
|
| User: "BradGuth" |
|
| Title: Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based |
05 May 2007 08:04:13 PM |
|
|
On May 5, 12:16 pm, Phineas T Puddleduck <phineaspuddled...@gmail.com>
wrote:
In article <1178392249.999293.262...@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
The newest saucerhead goes off on another rant!
Besides the likes of mailgate.org being totally news obstructive, as
otherwise being client specific filtered and/or as having so often
excluded most all that rocks their public infomercial spewing boat, as
further proof/evidence of the ulterior motives and hidden agendas
imposed by those in charge of keeping those mainstream status quo lids
on tight, and of that which keeps their grand ruse/sting of the
century in full swing, I offer:
Discussion subject changed to "EVIDENCE: Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-
Truth/Faith-Based" by Art Deco
These mainstream status quo rusemasters also pounced upon "How Did the
Universe Survive the Big Bang?" as having been renamed a dozen times,
and only worse off hijackings imposed upon my topics. See for
yourself how many times an original topic gets hijacked by getting
renamed and/or by way of getting dragged into cesspool groups of
clowns taking an extra bite. Since Usenet insiders/controllers have
intentionally provided this hijacking capability, and having sustained
and even rewarded it usage, as their status quo norm of damage
control, is why there's little chance of honest folks sharing much of
anything that matters to the public that's not willing to filter out
the gauntlet of mainstream flak that's without question far more faith-
based and/or politically motivated then not.
Most topic renaming has been intentionally made so extensive that it
totally obscures and/or skews whatever the original author intended.
This clown tactic is not by any mistake, nor is it being addressed by
those Usenet insiders capable of having prevented such actions by
anyone other than the originating author (if even allowing that much).
I foolishly wish usenet folks (the good, the bad and the downright
ugly) would stop such hijacking by way of their renaming these topics,
as it's bad enough our having been topic/author stalked and bashed
without our having to continually search for the original topic or
otherwise having to deal with their special Usenet cesspool groups
(such as alt.fan.art-bell and alt.usenet.kooks) that have nothing but
ulterior motives and hidden agendas to offer.
These individuals or rather borg collectives of mostly Old Testament
or some other faith-based and/or political skewed mindset continually
claim as being total atheist and otherwise without any political or
big business affiliations, but we all honestly know for a bloody fact
that's a lie, and otherwise we know that these topic/author stalking
folks are more or less official government spooks/moles or having been
working on behalf of such without an honest speck of remorse, whereas
most having been so dishonest that they simply do not exist as real
people (more so as anti-truth and otherwise somewhat sleeper cell or
cult worthy, I'd say).
Notice how the Usenet index of whatever's search topic relevant (such
as a search forBradGuth) and otherwise as "sorted by date" are
usually skewed far away from what's honestly the case. In other
words, usenet is very much humanly moderated in favor of their
promoting and/or sustaining whatever's their faith-based or political
agenda of the day. There's absolutely nothing fair about usenet, that
is unless you're one of those that happen to think what the Third
Reich had going was fair.
--
Sacred keeper of the Hollow Sphere, and the space within the Coffee Boy
singularity.
COOSN-174-07-82116: alt.astronomy's favourite poster (from a survey taken
of the saucerhead high command).- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
And your "alt.usenet.kooks" naysay problem with the whole truth and
nothing but the truth is?
-
Brad Guth
.
|
|
|
| User: "Art Deco" |
|
| Title: Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based |
05 May 2007 09:06:42 PM |
|
|
BradGuth <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 5, 12:16 pm, Phineas T Puddleduck <phineaspuddled...@gmail.com>
wrote:
In article <1178392249.999293.262...@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
The newest saucerhead goes off on another rant!
Besides the likes of mailgate.org being totally news obstructive, as
otherwise being client specific filtered and/or as having so often
excluded most all that rocks their public infomercial spewing boat, as
further proof/evidence of the ulterior motives and hidden agendas
imposed by those in charge of keeping those mainstream status quo lids
on tight, and of that which keeps their grand ruse/sting of the
century in full swing, I offer:
Discussion subject changed to "EVIDENCE: Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-
Truth/Faith-Based" by Art Deco
These mainstream status quo rusemasters also pounced upon "How Did the
Universe Survive the Big Bang?" as having been renamed a dozen times,
and only worse off hijackings imposed upon my topics. See for
yourself how many times an original topic gets hijacked by getting
renamed and/or by way of getting dragged into cesspool groups of
clowns taking an extra bite. Since Usenet insiders/controllers have
intentionally provided this hijacking capability, and having sustained
and even rewarded it usage, as their status quo norm of damage
control, is why there's little chance of honest folks sharing much of
anything that matters to the public that's not willing to filter out
the gauntlet of mainstream flak that's without question far more faith-
based and/or politically motivated then not.
Most topic renaming has been intentionally made so extensive that it
totally obscures and/or skews whatever the original author intended.
This clown tactic is not by any mistake, nor is it being addressed by
those Usenet insiders capable of having prevented such actions by
anyone other than the originating author (if even allowing that much).
I foolishly wish usenet folks (the good, the bad and the downright
ugly) would stop such hijacking by way of their renaming these topics,
as it's bad enough our having been topic/author stalked and bashed
without our having to continually search for the original topic or
otherwise having to deal with their special Usenet cesspool groups
(such as alt.fan.art-bell and alt.usenet.kooks) that have nothing but
ulterior motives and hidden agendas to offer.
These individuals or rather borg collectives of mostly Old Testament
or some other faith-based and/or political skewed mindset continually
claim as being total atheist and otherwise without any political or
big business affiliations, but we all honestly know for a bloody fact
that's a lie, and otherwise we know that these topic/author stalking
folks are more or less official government spooks/moles or having been
working on behalf of such without an honest speck of remorse, whereas
most having been so dishonest that they simply do not exist as real
people (more so as anti-truth and otherwise somewhat sleeper cell or
cult worthy, I'd say).
Notice how the Usenet index of whatever's search topic relevant (such
as a search forBradGuth) and otherwise as "sorted by date" are
usually skewed far away from what's honestly the case. In other
words, usenet is very much humanly moderated in favor of their
promoting and/or sustaining whatever's their faith-based or political
agenda of the day. There's absolutely nothing fair about usenet, that
is unless you're one of those that happen to think what the Third
Reich had going was fair.
--
Sacred keeper of the Hollow Sphere, and the space within the Coffee Boy
singularity.
COOSN-174-07-82116: alt.astronomy's favourite poster (from a survey taken
of the saucerhead high command).- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
And your "alt.usenet.kooks" naysay problem with the whole truth and
nothing but the truth is?
due to your multiple kook awards, Brad.
--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco
"Causation of gravity is missing frame field always attempting
renormalization back to base memory of equalized uniform momentum."
-- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief
"Of doing Venus in person would obviously incorporate a composite
rigid airship, along with it's internal cache of frozen pizza and
ice cold beer."
-- Brad Guth, bigoted racist
.
|
|
|
| User: "mariposas rand mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges" |
|
| Title: Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based |
05 May 2007 10:44:07 PM |
|
|
is this a reference to the mail routing used by some servers nowadays
meow arf meow - they are performing horrible experiments in space
major grubert is watching you - beware the bakalite
impeach the ***** - the airtight garage has you neo
.
|
|
|
| User: "BradGuth" |
|
| Title: Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based |
06 May 2007 11:36:33 AM |
|
|
On 5 May, 20:44, mariposas rand mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges
<mair_fh...@yahoo.com> wrote:
is this a reference to the mail routing used by some servers nowadays
It has to do with certain MI/NSA usenet insiders, as for such spooks/
moles getting away with whatever suits their Old Testament perverted
mindset of ulterior motives or hidden agenda.
There's no other honest usenet server reason(s) for how the badly
skewed usenet index of topics and/or of replies is clearly rigged in
order to favor their own mainstream status quo. At least on my PC
there's proof positive of such Third Reich tactics that are rather
oddly far more Jewish mindset than not.
-
Brad Guth
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Art Deco" |
|
| Title: EVIDENCE: Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based |
05 May 2007 07:02:54 PM |
|
|
Phineas T Puddleduck <phineaspuddleduck@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <1178392249.999293.262450@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
BradGuth <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote:
The newest saucerhead goes off on another rant!
Yes, another load of evidence for his Looney Maroon.
N.B.: I didn't realize that adding one word to the subject line
constitutes a heinous criminal offense in GuthWorld. I truly had no
idea what he was ranting about.
Repeated; this should generate yet another GuthRant.
Besides the likes of mailgate.org being totally news obstructive, as
otherwise being client specific filtered and/or as having so often
excluded most all that rocks their public infomercial spewing boat, as
further proof/evidence of the ulterior motives and hidden agendas
imposed by those in charge of keeping those mainstream status quo lids
on tight, and of that which keeps their grand ruse/sting of the
century in full swing, I offer:
Discussion subject changed to "EVIDENCE: Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-
Truth/Faith-Based" by Art Deco
These mainstream status quo rusemasters also pounced upon "How Did the
Universe Survive the Big Bang?" as having been renamed a dozen times,
and only worse off hijackings imposed upon my topics. See for
yourself how many times an original topic gets hijacked by getting
renamed and/or by way of getting dragged into cesspool groups of
clowns taking an extra bite. Since Usenet insiders/controllers have
intentionally provided this hijacking capability, and having sustained
and even rewarded it usage, as their status quo norm of damage
control, is why there's little chance of honest folks sharing much of
anything that matters to the public that's not willing to filter out
the gauntlet of mainstream flak that's without question far more faith-
based and/or politically motivated then not.
Most topic renaming has been intentionally made so extensive that it
totally obscures and/or skews whatever the original author intended.
This clown tactic is not by any mistake, nor is it being addressed by
those Usenet insiders capable of having prevented such actions by
anyone other than the originating author (if even allowing that much).
I foolishly wish usenet folks (the good, the bad and the downright
ugly) would stop such hijacking by way of their renaming these topics,
as it's bad enough our having been topic/author stalked and bashed
without our having to continually search for the original topic or
otherwise having to deal with their special Usenet cesspool groups
(such as alt.fan.art-bell and alt.usenet.kooks) that have nothing but
ulterior motives and hidden agendas to offer.
These individuals or rather borg collectives of mostly Old Testament
or some other faith-based and/or political skewed mindset continually
claim as being total atheist and otherwise without any political or
big business affiliations, but we all honestly know for a bloody fact
that's a lie, and otherwise we know that these topic/author stalking
folks are more or less official government spooks/moles or having been
working on behalf of such without an honest speck of remorse, whereas
most having been so dishonest that they simply do not exist as real
people (more so as anti-truth and otherwise somewhat sleeper cell or
cult worthy, I'd say).
Notice how the Usenet index of whatever's search topic relevant (such
as a search for Brad Guth) and otherwise as "sorted by date" are
usually skewed far away from what's honestly the case. In other
words, usenet is very much humanly moderated in favor of their
promoting and/or sustaining whatever's their faith-based or political
agenda of the day. There's absolutely nothing fair about usenet, that
is unless you're one of those that happen to think what the Third
Reich had going was fair.
--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco
"Causation of gravity is missing frame field always attempting
renormalization back to base memory of equalized uniform momentum."
-- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief
"Of doing Venus in person would obviously incorporate a composite
rigid airship, along with it's internal cache of frozen pizza and
ice cold beer."
-- Brad Guth, bigoted racist
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "BradGuth" |
|
| Title: Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based |
05 May 2007 04:14:00 PM |
|
|
Once again and again, of each and every time I take a look-see at
whatever turns up with a public search of topics and replies by 'Brad
Guth', and then using the GOOGLE "Sorted by date" function, whereas lo
and behold, there's good old insider Fart Deco's original reply
sticking itself on top of the usenet index stack, of what's clearly
robo/insider usenet functioning as per usual, placing those pesky
ulterior motivations and hidden agendas of others on top of the search
stack, forcing the snookered and easily dumbfounded public and news
media bozos to perceive that only his outdated robo reply is what
matters. Of course, this silly brown-nosed and very Jewish clown
tactic only proves that I'm right, and in far more ways than I've thus
far discovered. Even "Phineas T Puddleduck" offers us another good
example of a usenet rusemaster in action, as having been doing exactly
what I've said from the very get-go, of topic/author stalking and
having added their usual cesspool news group(s) in for good measure.
Besides the likes of mailgate.org being totally news obstructive, as
otherwise being client specific filtered and/or as having so often
excluded most all that rocks their public infomercial spewing boat, as
further proof/evidence of these ulterior motives and hidden agendas
imposed by those in charge of keeping their mainstream status quo lids
on tight, and of that which keeps their grand ruse/sting of the
century in full swing, I offer:
Discussion subject changed to "EVIDENCE: Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-
Truth/Faith-Based" by Art Deco
These mainstream status quo rusemasters also pounced upon "How Did the
Universe Survive the Big Bang?" as having been renamed a dozen times,
and only worse off hijackings imposed upon my topics. See for
yourself how many times an original topic gets hijacked by getting
renamed and/or by way of getting dragged into cesspool groups of
clowns taking an extra bite. Since Usenet insiders/controllers have
intentionally provided this hijacking capability, and having sustained
and even rewarded it usage, as their status quo norm of damage
control, is why there's little chance of honest folks sharing much of
anything that matters to the public that's not willing to filter out
the gauntlet of mainstream flak that's without question far more faith-
based and/or politically motivated then not.
Most topic renaming has been intentionally made so extensive that it
totally obscures and/or skews whatever the original author intended.
This clown tactic is not by any mistake, nor is it being addressed by
those Usenet insiders capable of having prevented such actions by
anyone other than the originating author (if even allowing that much).
I foolishly wish usenet folks (the good, the bad and the downright
ugly) would stop such hijacking by way of their renaming these topics,
as it's bad enough our having been topic/author stalked and bashed
without our having to continually search for the original topic or
otherwise having to deal with their special Usenet cesspool groups
(such as alt.fan.art-bell and alt.usenet.kooks) that have nothing but
ulterior motives and hidden agendas to offer.
These individuals or rather borg collectives of mostly Old Testament
or some other faith-based and/or political skewed mindset continually
claim as being total atheist and otherwise without any political or
big business affiliations, but we all honestly know for a bloody fact
that's a lie, and otherwise we know that these topic/author stalking
folks are more or less official government spooks/moles or having been
working on behalf of such without an honest speck of remorse, whereas
most having been so dishonest that they simply do not exist as real
people (more so as anti-truth and otherwise somewhat sleeper cell or
cult worthy, I'd say).
Notice how your Usenet index of whatever's search/topic that's "Sort
by relevance" (such as a search for: Brad Guth) and otherwise as
"Sorted by date" are usually skewed far away from what's honestly the
case, with typically a full page or more that's offering so much other
orchestrated infomercial crapolla, that sticks no matters what else
gets posted, as their insider stuff stays on top of that search index
stack. In other words, usenet is very much humanly moderated in a
highly biased favor of their having promoted and/or sustained
whatever's their faith-based or political agenda of the day.
As far as I can tell, there's absolutely nothing fair or otherwise
honest or even balanced about usenet, that is unless you're one of
those that happen to think what the Third Reich had going was fair.
If you're thinking or otherwise suggesting MI/NSA isn't a very big
part of usenet, then you're either a bigger fool of a dumbfounded
village idiot, or you're actually one of them.
-
Brad Guth
.
|
|
|
| User: "BradGuth" |
|
| Title: Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based |
05 May 2007 05:09:30 PM |
|
|
More solid proof-positive of usenet's incest robo-posting, and/or of
Usenet insider fuckology running amuck.
-
EVIDENCE: Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based Group:
sci.physics ... scoring=d&hl=en I may even have to start posting a few
other secondary topics
for the very same pesky reasons. So, stay tuned for the latest news
from the
weird but honest worlds of Brad Guth and G=EMC^2 Glazier. ...
May 4 by Art Deco - 9 messages - 4 authors
-
Brad Guth
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "BradGuth" |
|
| Title: Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based |
05 May 2007 06:55:00 PM |
|
|
Usenet is still stuck in the usual Art Deco robo-posting rut, keeping
his bigoted crapolla on top of the index topic stack, as though this
Jewish incest mutated freak were their God.
No wonder Usenet sucks and blows worse off than our resident LLPOF
warlord(GW Bush).
-
EVIDENCE: Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based Group:
sci.physics ... scoring=d&hl=en I may even have to start posting a few
other secondary topics
for the very same pesky reasons. So, stay tuned for the latest news
from the
weird but honest worlds of Brad Guth and G=EMC^2 Glazier. ...
May 4 by Art Deco - 10 messages - 4 authors
-
Watch how my more recent contribution gets robo replaced with this
same old one of "EVIDENCE: Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-
Based", as previously posted by Fart Deco, as being right back on top
of their stack of what the public gets to read first. It's almost
like the Third Reich and of their Jewish minions never left town.
-
Brad Guth
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "BradGuth" |
|
| Title: Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based |
05 May 2007 02:48:57 PM |
|
|
Once again and again, of what's robo/insider usenet is still placing
the ulterior motivations and hidden agendas of others on top of the
search stack, forcing the snookered and easily dumbfounded public to
perceive that only their outdated reply is what matters. Of course,
this silly tactic only proves that I'm right, and in far more ways
than I've thus far discovered. Even "Phineas T Puddleduck" is another
good example of a usenet rusemaster in action, as having been doing
exactly what I've said from the very get-go, of topic/author stalking
and having added their usual cesspool news group(s) for good measure.
Besides the likes of mailgate.org being totally news obstructive, as
otherwise being client specific filtered and/or as having so often
excluded most all that rocks their public infomercial spewing boat, as
further proof/evidence of the ulterior motives and hidden agendas
imposed by those in charge of keeping those mainstream status quo lids
on tight, and of that which keeps their grand ruse/sting of the
century in full swing, I offer:
Discussion subject changed to "EVIDENCE: Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-
Truth/Faith-Based" by Art Deco
These mainstream status quo rusemasters also pounced upon "How Did the
Universe Survive the Big Bang?" as having been renamed a dozen times,
and only worse off hijackings imposed upon my topics. See for
yourself how many times an original topic gets hijacked by getting
renamed and/or by way of getting dragged into cesspool groups of
clowns taking an extra bite. Since Usenet insiders/controllers have
intentionally provided this hijacking capability, and having sustained
and even rewarded it usage, as their status quo norm of damage
control, is why there's little chance of honest folks sharing much of
anything that matters to the public that's not willing to filter out
the gauntlet of mainstream flak that's without question far more faith-
based and/or politically motivated then not.
Most topic renaming has been intentionally made so extensive that it
totally obscures and/or skews whatever the original author intended.
This clown tactic is not by any mistake, nor is it being addressed by
those Usenet insiders capable of having prevented such actions by
anyone other than the originating author (if even allowing that much).
I foolishly wish usenet folks (the good, the bad and the downright
ugly) would stop such hijacking by way of their renaming these topics,
as it's bad enough our having been topic/author stalked and bashed
without our having to continually search for the original topic or
otherwise having to deal with their special Usenet cesspool groups
(such as alt.fan.art-bell and alt.usenet.kooks) that have nothing but
ulterior motives and hidden agendas to offer.
These individuals or rather borg collectives of mostly Old Testament
or some other faith-based and/or political skewed mindset continually
claim as being total atheist and otherwise without any political or
big business affiliations, but we all honestly know for a bloody fact
that's a lie, and otherwise we know that these topic/author stalking
folks are more or less official government spooks/moles or having been
working on behalf of such without an honest speck of remorse, whereas
most having been so dishonest that they simply do not exist as real
people (more so as anti-truth and otherwise somewhat sleeper cell or
cult worthy, I'd say).
Notice how your Usenet index of whatever's search/topic that's "Sort
by relevance" (such as a search for: Brad Guth) and otherwise as
"Sorted by date" are usually skewed far away from what's honestly the
case, with typically a full page or more that's offering so much other
orchestrated infomercial crapolla, that sticks no matters what else
gets posted, as their insider stuff stays on top of that search index
stack. In other words, usenet is very much humanly moderated in a
highly biased favor of their having promoted and/or sustained
whatever's their faith-based or political agenda of the day.
As far as I can tell, there's absolutely nothing fair or otherwise
honest or even balanced about usenet, that is unless you're one of
those that happen to think what the Third Reich had going was fair.
If you're thinking or otherwise suggesting MI/NSA isn't a very big
part of usenet, then you're either a bigger fool of a dumbfounded
village idiot, or you're actually one of them.
-
Brad Guth
.
|
|
|
| User: "Phineas T Puddleduck" |
|
| Title: Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based |
05 May 2007 02:54:33 PM |
|
|
In article <1178394537.287452.200060@u30g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
BradGuth <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote:
As far as I can tell, there's absolutely nothing fair or otherwise
honest or even balanced about usenet, that is unless you're one of
those that happen to think what the Third Reich had going was fair.
If you're thinking or otherwise suggesting MI/NSA isn't a very big
part of usenet, then you're either a bigger fool of a dumbfounded
village idiot, or you're actually one of them.
Then please, kindly bugger off.
--
Sacred keeper of the Hollow Sphere, and the space within the Coffee Boy
singularity.
COOSN-174-07-82116: alt.astronomy's favourite poster (from a survey taken
of the saucerhead high command).
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "BradGuth" |
|
| Title: Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based |
04 May 2007 01:56:55 PM |
|
|
Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based : as an updated/part-2,
whereas rather oddly this one and most of anything else controversial
is not even getting mailgate/usenet listed, even though having been
originally posted from that server, much less shared into the likes of
alt.astronomy as I'd intended.
Why is there so much ongoing topic purging, or rather a hoard of those
original topic/author stalking spook/mole rats jumping ship. Is it
something I've said or having asked?
Why is sci.physics, alt.astronomy and of so many other public groups
becoming so anti-think-tank, and otherwise so robo/stealth moderated
to death?
Are those MIB shadows of damage-control spooks and moles showing up
everywhere?
Is it simply because us few honest folks don't happen to like our
resident LLPOF warlord(Jeb Bush)?
How the hell can the likes of Scott Miller close out and/or banish a
given topic that's not even his to begin with?
As having been recently pointed out by G=EMC^2 Glazier's "America's
Next revolution"
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.astronomy/browse_frm/thread/da393cade9ceaa88/1cf0761ca3e283b5?hl=en#1cf0761ca3e283b5
That "low wit parrot" of a pesky Mafia factor is something deeply
rooted within Usenet, and it's being run rather nicely as a faith-
based black hole that's continually sucking the rest of us into their
event horizon by the brown-nosed talented likes of Scott Miller,
that's clearly an insider spook/mole or whatever that's fully intent
upon keeping the likes of our pesky replies of sharing those honestly
deductive thoughts and especially that of our truth seeking questions,
as banished outside of and/or excluded from as many Usenet groups as
possible.
I'm still a bit sorry that I even had to bother doing it this way, but
our warm and fuzzy Scott Miller(aka "low wit parrot") of a rusemaster
and the like, have been intentionally diverting and/or keeping the
likes of my replies entirely out of their alt.astronomy Usenet realm,
thereby having excluded us outsiders from their stack of hijacked
topics, along with otherwise sharing their latest robo GOOGLE/Usenet
system message being:
"There are no more messages on this topic. All messages in this topic
may have expired or been deleted."
That's certainly a new one, especially interesting when applied to a
fresh/new topic that I'd just posted. Silly old me, I didn't know
such a public Usenet was getting remote controlled by those with such
hidden agendas and ulterior motives (aka Third Reich and/or OT/Jewish
mindset worthy).
Lo and behold otherwise, we keep getting that other pesky message:
"Your account or Internet address has exceeded our posting limit at
this time, please try again later." In other words, apparently our
topics and replies are running at too much bandwidth. (sorry about
that)
Due to such robo-moderation that's seriously running amuck, you'll now
have to go to this secondary topic if you want to read my last reply
to G=EMC^2 Glazier's "What if (on White Dwarfs)"
Otherwise, keep using the likes of GOOGLE/Usenet or something other
than your filtered PC Usenet reader has to offer, in order to check up
on what's otherwise happening to your topics in the public eye, as
it's actually getting very cloak and dagger Mafia worthy, with the
likes of e-whacking us out of their faith-based and/or cloak and
dagger picture.
Scott Miller: What if (on White Dwarfs)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/3769b2961bbfc213/7939b2ceb5dfd578?hl=en#7939b2ceb5dfd578
What if (on White Dwarfs) / by G=EMC^2 Glazier (the original topic)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.astronomy/browse_frm/thread/ccdfca1d336f5a08?scoring=d&hl=en
I may even have to start posting a few other secondary topics for the
very same pesky reasons. So, stay tuned for the latest news from the
weird but honest worlds of Brad Guth and G=EMC^2 Glazier.
-
Brad Guth (aka Usenet Good Guy)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Art Deco" |
|
| Title: EVIDENCE: Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based |
04 May 2007 02:26:48 PM |
|
|
I offer the following rant in support of Brad's nomination for CNotM:
BradGuth <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote:
Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based : as an updated/part-2,
whereas rather oddly this one and most of anything else controversial
is not even getting mailgate/usenet listed, even though having been
originally posted from that server, much less shared into the likes of
alt.astronomy as I'd intended.
Why is there so much ongoing topic purging, or rather a hoard of those
original topic/author stalking spook/mole rats jumping ship. Is it
something I've said or having asked?
Why is sci.physics, alt.astronomy and of so many other public groups
becoming so anti-think-tank, and otherwise so robo/stealth moderated
to death?
Are those MIB shadows of damage-control spooks and moles showing up
everywhere?
Is it simply because us few honest folks don't happen to like our
resident LLPOF warlord(Jeb Bush)?
How the hell can the likes of Scott Miller close out and/or banish a
given topic that's not even his to begin with?
As having been recently pointed out by G=EMC^2 Glazier's "America's
Next revolution"
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.astronomy/browse_frm/thread/da393cade9ceaa88
/1cf0761ca3e283b5?hl=en#1cf0761ca3e283b5
That "low wit parrot" of a pesky Mafia factor is something deeply
rooted within Usenet, and it's being run rather nicely as a faith-
based black hole that's continually sucking the rest of us into their
event horizon by the brown-nosed talented likes of Scott Miller,
that's clearly an insider spook/mole or whatever that's fully intent
upon keeping the likes of our pesky replies of sharing those honestly
deductive thoughts and especially that of our truth seeking questions,
as banished outside of and/or excluded from as many Usenet groups as
possible.
I'm still a bit sorry that I even had to bother doing it this way, but
our warm and fuzzy Scott Miller(aka "low wit parrot") of a rusemaster
and the like, have been intentionally diverting and/or keeping the
likes of my replies entirely out of their alt.astronomy Usenet realm,
thereby having excluded us outsiders from their stack of hijacked
topics, along with otherwise sharing their latest robo GOOGLE/Usenet
system message being:
"There are no more messages on this topic. All messages in this topic
may have expired or been deleted."
That's certainly a new one, especially interesting when applied to a
fresh/new topic that I'd just posted. Silly old me, I didn't know
such a public Usenet was getting remote controlled by those with such
hidden agendas and ulterior motives (aka Third Reich and/or OT/Jewish
mindset worthy).
Lo and behold otherwise, we keep getting that other pesky message:
"Your account or Internet address has exceeded our posting limit at
this time, please try again later." In other words, apparently our
topics and replies are running at too much bandwidth. (sorry about
that)
Due to such robo-moderation that's seriously running amuck, you'll now
have to go to this secondary topic if you want to read my last reply
to G=EMC^2 Glazier's "What if (on White Dwarfs)"
Otherwise, keep using the likes of GOOGLE/Usenet or something other
than your filtered PC Usenet reader has to offer, in order to check up
on what's otherwise happening to your topics in the public eye, as
it's actually getting very cloak and dagger Mafia worthy, with the
likes of e-whacking us out of their faith-based and/or cloak and
dagger picture.
Scott Miller: What if (on White Dwarfs)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/3769b2961bbfc213/7
939b2ceb5dfd578?hl=en#7939b2ceb5dfd578
What if (on White Dwarfs) / by G=EMC^2 Glazier (the original topic)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.astronomy/browse_frm/thread/ccdfca1d336f5a08?
scoring=d&hl=en
I may even have to start posting a few other secondary topics for the
very same pesky reasons. So, stay tuned for the latest news from the
weird but honest worlds of Brad Guth and G=EMC^2 Glazier.
-
Brad Guth (aka Usenet Good Guy)
--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco
"Causation of gravity is missing frame field always attempting
renormalization back to base memory of equalized uniform momentum."
-- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief
"Of doing Venus in person would obviously incorporate a composite
rigid airship, along with it's internal cache of frozen pizza and
ice cold beer."
-- Brad Guth, bigoted racist
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ben newsam" |
|
| Title: Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based |
07 May 2007 08:09:14 AM |
|
|
On 4 May 2007 11:56:55 -0700, BradGuth <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote:
Why is sci.physics, alt.astronomy and of so many other public groups
becoming so anti-think-tank, and otherwise so robo/stealth moderated
to death?
They aren't. They would be if I had anything to do with it, so I
wouldn't have to read your drivel.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "BradGuth" |
|
| Title: Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based |
06 May 2007 08:38:06 AM |
|
|
Wow! I'm right, as usual.
GOOGLE/Usenet and especially MailGate/Usenet and naturally UKs extra
tight butt-crack Ureader/Usenet service are each doing a real bang-up
job of covering thy infomercial spewing butts, by way of excluding
whomever and/or trashing whatever rocks their boat.
Ureader: "This account has been banned because it violated the Google
Groups Terms Of Use." which means they clearly don't want folks
telling the truth.
Topic/author stalking and summarily trashing via brown-nosed clowns
doing their usual MI/NSA cloak and dagger spook/mole naysay thing, is
fairly obvious.
Don't you just love it when you're right all along.
-
Brad guth
.
|
|
|
| User: "BradGuth" |
|
| Title: Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based |
06 May 2007 03:12:28 PM |
|
|
On 6 May, 06:38, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
Wow! I'm right, as usual.
GOOGLE/Usenet and especially MailGate/Usenet and naturally UKs extra
tight butt-crack Ureader/Usenet service are each doing a real bang-up
job of covering thy infomercial spewing butts, by way of excluding
whomever and/or trashing whatever rocks their boat.
Ureader: "This account has been banned because it violated the Google
Groups Terms Of Use." which means they clearly don't want folks
telling the truth.
Topic/author stalking and summarily trashing via brown-nosed clowns
doing their usual MI/NSA cloak and dagger spook/mole naysay thing, is
fairly obvious.
Don't you just love it when you're right all along.
-Bradguth
Usenet = Born Again Bigots-R-Us (aka Art Deco and Jewish company at
large)
This usenet sure as hell isn't being run amuck by Muslims, or most any
other faith-based group, is it. Hell's bells, most blacks are even
excluded, which gives this warm and fuzzy usenet a somewhat e-KKK
status quo, if not e-(Third Reich) with a Jewish flavor to boot.
-
Brad Guth
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Snyder" |
|
| Title: Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based |
06 May 2007 04:35:33 PM |
|
|
On 6 May 2007 13:12:28 -0700, BradGuth <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote:
On 6 May, 06:38, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
Wow! I'm right, as usual.
GOOGLE/Usenet and especially MailGate/Usenet and naturally UKs extra
tight butt-crack Ureader/Usenet service are each doing a real bang-up
job of covering thy infomercial spewing butts, by way of excluding
whomever and/or trashing whatever rocks their boat.
Ureader: "This account has been banned because it violated the Google
Groups Terms Of Use." which means they clearly don't want folks
telling the truth.
Topic/author stalking and summarily trashing via brown-nosed clowns
doing their usual MI/NSA cloak and dagger spook/mole naysay thing, is
fairly obvious.
Don't you just love it when you're right all along.
-Bradguth
Usenet = Born Again Bigots-R-Us (aka Art Deco and Jewish company at
large)
This usenet sure as hell isn't being run amuck by Muslims, or most any
other faith-based group, is it. Hell's bells, most blacks are even
excluded, which gives this warm and fuzzy usenet a somewhat e-KKK
status quo, if not e-(Third Reich) with a Jewish flavor to boot.
Telling you that you're a racist, repulsive dolt, a scientific
ignoramus, and a delusional wackjob doesn't make someone a bigot. It
just marks them as capable of reading your posts.
--
Bill Snyder [This space unintentionally left blank.]
.
|
|
|
| User: "BradGuth" |
|
| Title: Re: Usenet Servers going Anti-Truth/Faith-Based |
06 May 2007 05:19:45 PM |
|
|
On 6 May, 14:35, Bill Snyder <bsny...@airmail.net> wrote:
On 6 May 2007 13:12:28 -0700, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 6 May, 06:38, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
Wow! I'm right, as usual.
GOOGLE/Usenet and especially MailGate/Usenet and naturally UKs extra
tight butt-crack Ureader/Usenet service are each doing a real bang-up
job of covering thy infomercial spewing butts, by way of excluding
whomever and/or trashing whatever rocks their boat.
Ureader: "This account has been banned because it violated the Google
Groups Terms Of Use." which means they clearly don't want folks
telling the truth.
Topic/author stalking and summarily trashing via brown-nosed clowns
doing their usual MI/NSA cloak and dagger spook/mole naysay thing, is
fairly obvious.
Don't you just love it when you're right all along.
-Bradguth
Usenet = Born Again Bigots-R-Us (aka Art Deco and Jewish company at
large)
This usenet sure as hell isn't being run amuck by Muslims, or most any
other faith-based group, is it. Hell's bells, most blacks are even
excluded, which gives this warm and fuzzy usenet a somewhat e-KKK
status quo, if not e-(Third Reich) with a Jewish flavor to boot.
Telling you that you're a racist, repulsive dolt, a scientific
ignoramus, and a delusional wackjob doesn't make someone a bigot. It
just marks them as capable of reading your posts.
So telling those mainstream status quo lies upon lies, or as having
been excluding evidence that doesn't fit your mindset, or such as
allowing all that's derived from those of your kind and GW Bush, is
supposedly not being a "racist, repulsive dolt, a scientific
ignoramus, and a delusional wackjob"?
"It just marks them as capable of reading your posts."
I can't be sure; Was that one an encrypted message from your very own
black hole?
I'm afraid that Usenet is not entirely robo, whereas instead it's
capably moderated and/or stealth managed from those having the proper
master codes and/or having those nifty back-door and/or special-
interest tricks at their disposal. Unlike specifically moderated
groups, those supposedly unmoderated groups as served by way of
computers as such, are not capable of AI running amuck, whereas it
takes the expertise of individuals in charge of allowing, diverting
and/or skewing each and every byte of whatever gets posted.
Phony topic index stacking and/or simply not giving proper index
updates to those you folks hate the most is clearly what being Third
Reich or just extra special bigoted is all about, isn't it.
Some Usenet servers are of course much worse off than others, few if
any are stand alone 'free-for-all' robo-usenet servers without human
factors. In other words, Usenet is exactly whatever those in charge
intend and/or allow it to be, including those client specific
capabilities that makes it possible for certain groups to being
excluded and/or made to think quite differently than the facts
represent, and that's exactly what most any government and of their
faith-based or big-business (including MI/NSA) puppeteers insist upon
maintaining as such. Only a damn fool (such as anyone supporting GW
Bush or just being naysay for the Old Testament hell of it) thinks
otherwise.
-
Brad Guth
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|