Weak Heisenberg Principle



 Science > Physics > Weak Heisenberg Principle

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "OsherD"
Date: 14 Aug 2005 02:07:00 AM
Object: Weak Heisenberg Principle

From Osher Doctorow


COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Weak Heisenberg Principle
Copyright By Owner Osher Doctorow Ph.D.
First Published 2005
If there is actually a physical dimension of mass (M) on an "equal
footing" with the dimension of time (T), or in Probable Influence (PI)
several mass and time dimensions, then a "weak Heisenberg" principle or
really several different ones in different (possibly local)
circumstances make sense.
Recall that the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (HUP) says:
1) delta(x)delta(p) > = k
where delta(x) is the uncertainty in position (x), p is momentum, k is
a very small positive constant which is related to Planck's constant.
The Weak HUP or WHUP says:
2) xp = k_i (or ki), i in some (possibly infinite) index set
where ki > = k of (1).
Consider p = mv and now let m = f(t). Then we write (2) as:
3) xf(t)dx/dt = ki
and depending on how f(t) is chosen, position and time can vary
parabolically, exponentially, inversely or proportional to inverse
squares, etc. The cases mentioned are included in the following
possible choices of f(t):
4) f(t) = constant
5) f(t) = 1/t
6) f(t) = t
7) f(t) = t^2
Notice that if we take x as a radial position or a position along one
spatial axis, then 4-7 say that mass is respectively constant in time,
decreases with time, and (for 6 and 7) increases with time. In case
(6), dm/dt = 1, while in (7) dm/dt = 2t and Dtt(m) = 2 > 0 so mass
accelerates in time.
It turns out that if m is constant, then t is a parabolic function of
x, while if m = 1/t, then x^2 = k1t^2 + k2 for some constants k1 and k2
(k1 positive), and if m = t then exp(c) t^ki = exp((1/2)x^2) which
resembles the normal/Gaussian distribution with the power of t
replacing the probability density function. If m = t^2, then (1/2)x^2
= -ki/t + c = c - ki/t, and if c is a positive constant and ki is a
positive constant,then we get a singularity at t = 0 which might
describe a black hole.
It is obvious that x can accelerate with time (Dtt(x) > 0 where Dtt is
the second (partial or ordinary) derivative with regard to time (t)) in
some of these or similar scenarios.
Osher Doctorow
.


  Page 1 of 1


Related Articles
Weak Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle Combined With Special Relativity
Intelligent Design is in retreat. Weak Anthropic Principle Triumphs
Violations of C, P, and T in electromagnetic and strong but not weak.
Effects of weak electric fields on the activity of neurons and neuronal networks
Neutrino Conversion & Weak Field Conduction
Photo = U(1) weak hypercharge + U(2) weak isospin
Re: The Two Weak Links .
Re: The Two Weak Links .
Random thought: Dark Matter & Dark Energy vs. Strong & Weak NuclearForces
Surprising apriori Bohmian HV calculation of 10^-17 cm weak forcescale
Re: Neutron Unstability & Weak Interactions
Fundamental Forces Triple Code 2: Weak Interaction As Time-Related
Re: American soldiers are weak and cowardly - Here's the proof!
Re: turdtapper's delusion of relevance, fantasies for the weak minded when pulling on their pud
Code of Universe vs Genetic Code 4: Randall, Wesson, Weak Equivalence
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER