| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"rhastings0419" |
| Date: |
27 Jul 2003 06:24:29 PM |
| Object: |
"Weighing the Graviton" |
"Weighing the Graviton"
Posted by Denoco Inc. of Texas on Jul 27, 2003 at 15:06
(12.237.89.80)
Re: General Relativity-Quantum Mechanics Unified (Rebecca Hastings)
9^9 (387,420,489) Combinations/Equations
http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/
[UPDATED 1998 CODATA-NIST VALUES]
The Primary Universal Gravitation Equations
1) calculate graviton energy constant E
E=(hc^5/G)^1/2
4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 = [(6.6260687 x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s)
(2.4216061 x 10^42 m^5/s^5)/(6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2)]^1/2
4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 = 4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2
[rsu 3.9 x 10^-8]
2) calculate graviton frequency constant v
v=c^5/GE
7.4008894 x 10^42 /s = (2.4216061 x 10^42 m^5/s^5)/
(6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2)(4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2)
7.4008894 x 10^42 /s = 7.4008894 x 10^42 /s
[rsu 3.9 x 10^-8]
3) calculate graviton mass constant m
m=hc^3/GE
5.4563026 x 10^-8 kg = (6.6260687 x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s)
(2.6944002 x 10^25 m^3/s^3)/(6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2)
(4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2)
5.4563026 x 10^-8 kg = 5.4563026 x 10^-8 kg
[rsu 3.9 x 10^-8]
4) calculate graviton density constant d
d=E^2/Gh^2
8.2089591 x 10^95 kg/m^3 = (2.4048041 x 10^19 kg^2-m^4/s^4)/
(6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2)(4.3904787 x 10^-67 kg^2-m^4/s^2)
8.2089591 x 10^95 kg/m^3 = 8.2089591 x 10^95 kg/m^3
[rsu 3.9 x 10^-8]
5) calculate graviton volume constant V
V=G/v^2
1.2181812 x 10^-96 m^3/kg = (6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2)/
(5.4773164 x 10^85 /s^2)
1.2181812 x 10^-96 m^3/kg = 1.2181812 x 10^-96 m^3/kg
h is Planck constant, c is speed of light, G is Newton constant, e is
elementary charge, b is second radiation constant, M is molar mass
The Primary Universal Base Unit Values
1) mass... (hc/G)^1/2 = 5.4563026(39) x 10^-8 kg
2) length... (hG/c^3)^1/2 = 4.0507625(38) x 10^-35 m
3) time... (hG/c^5)^1/2 = 1.3511889(41) x 10^-43 s
4) current... e/(hG/c^5)^1/2 = 1.1857530(90) x 10^24 A
5) temperature... b/(hG/c^3)^1/2 = 3.5518626(82) x 10^32 K
6) substance... M/(hc/G)^1/2 = 1.6605387(31) x 10^-27 kmol
7) intensity... (hG/c^5)^1/2/sr = 1.9720204(06) x 10^-45 cd
8) Einstein Solid Angle = 6.8517999(97) x 10^1 sr
9) Planck Plane Angle = 1.3703599(97) x 10^2 rad
The Primary Universal Physical Constants
001) irradiance constant i. = 4.5211591(52) x 10-122 s^3/kg
002) radiance constant i.= 3.0978078(26) x 10-120 s^3-sr/kg
003) radiant volume constant = 1.3554094(15) x 10^-113 m-s^2/kg
004) G-D volume constant = 6.6467654(65) x 10^-104 m^3
005) graviton volume constant = 1.2181812(31) x 10^-96 m^3/kg
006) luminous efficacy = 3.7229937(53) x 10^-96 cd-sr-s^3/kg-m^2
007) electric current volume = 1.3838190(49) x 10^-93 m^2/A
008) luminous energy = 1.8257115(55) x 10^-86 cd-sr-s
009) electric charge volume = 4.1485851(42) x 10^-85 m^3/A-s
010) molar volume = 4.0027765(33) x 10^-77 m^3/kmol
011) moment of inertia = 8.9530708(38) x 10^-77 kg-m^2
012) graviton fluidity = 1.0031235(26) x 10^-70 m-s/kg
013) G-D area constant = 1.6408677(14) x 10^-69 m^2
014) electric moment = 6.4900363(91) x 10^-54 A-s-m
015) Euclid capacitance = 5.234567901... x 10^-48 A^2-s^4/kg-m^2
016) magnetic moment = 1.9456639(62) x 10^-45 A-m^2
017) luminous intensity = 1.9720204(06) x 10^-45 cd
018) graviton frequency i. = 1.3511889(41) x 10^-43 s
019) luminous flux = 1.3511889(41) x 10^-43 cd-sr
020) graviton moment = 2.2102186(33) x 10^-42 kg-m
021) inductance constant = 3.4877980(18) x 10^-39 kg-m^2/A^2-s^2
022) absorption-emission = 2.4763819(58) x 10^-36 s/kg
023) graviton wavelength = 4.0507625(38) x 10^-35 m
024) Planck constant = 6.6260687(65) x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s
025) relative expansion = 2.8154241(58) x 10^-33 /K
026) electric resistivity = 1.0456155(41) x 10^-30 kg-m^3/A^2-s^3
027) unified substance = 1.6605387(31) x 10^-27 kmol
028) kinematic viscosity = 1.2143880(58) x 10^-26 m^2/s
029) inverse electric current = 8.4334589(42) x 10^-25 /A
030) Boltzmann constant= 1.3806502(93) x 10^-23 kg-m^2/s^2-K
031) thermal resistance = 9.7866124(96) x 10^-21 s^3-K/kg-m^2
032) graviton molality = 3.0433405(93) x 10^-20 kmol/kg
033) elementary charge = 1.6021764(62) x 10^-19 A-s
034) primary radiation = 5.9552136(16) x 10^-17 kg-m^4/s^3
035) specific heat = 2.5303770(42) x 10^-16 m^2/s^2-K
036) magnetic flux q. = 2.0678336(42) x 10^-15 kg-m^2-sr/A-s^2-rad
037) magnetic flux = 4.1356672(77) x 10^-15 kg-m^2/A-s^2
038) electric permittivity = 1.2922425(96) x 10^-13 A^2-s^4/kg-m^3
039) magnetic exposure = 2.9363775(58) x 10^-12 A-s/kg
040) electric constant = 8.854187817... x 10^-12 A^2-s^4-sr/kg-m^3
041) magnetic pole strength = 4.8032041(96) x 10^-11 A-m
042) Newton constant = 6.6723641(43) x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2
043) density of states = 2.0392015(07) x 10^-10 s^2/kg-m^2
044) S-B primary constant = 1.3897143(30) x 10^-9 kg/s^3-K^4
045) radiant distribution constant = 3.335640952... x 10^-9 s/m
046) graviton mass constant = 5.4563026(39) x 10^-8 kg
047) molar Planck constant = 3.9903126(87) x 10^-7 kg-m^2/s-kmol
048) magnetic constant = 1.256637061... x 10^-6 kg-m/A^2-s^2-sr
049) electric conductance = 3.8740458(43) x 10^-5 A^2-s^3/kg-m^2
050) conductance q. = 7.7480916(72) x 10^-5 A^2-s^3-rad/kg-m^2-sr
051) magnetic permeability = 8.6102258(15) x 10^-5 kg-m/A^2-s^2
052) fine-structure constant = 7.2973525(36) x 10^-3 /rad
053) second radiation constant = 1.4387752(29) x 10^-2 m-K
054) dielectric constant = 1.4594705(05) x 10^-2 /sr
055) gravitational momentum = 1.6357583(80) x 10^1 kg-m/s
056) relative permeability = 6.8517999(97) x 10^1 sr
057) inverse fine-structure = 1.3703599(97) x 10^2 rad
058) impedance of vacuum = 3.767303134… x 10^2 kg-m^2/A^2-s^3-sr
059) molar gas constant = 8.3144720(88) x 10^3 kg-m^2/s^2-kmol-K
060) spin angle constant = 9.3894326(23) x 10^3 sr-rad
061) i. conductance q. = 1.2906403(83) x 10^4 kg-m^2-sr/A^2-s^3-rad
062) von Klitzing constant = 2.5812807(61) x 10^4 kg-m^2/A^2-s^3
063) inverse gravitational mass = 1.8327429(14) x 10^7 /kg
064) Faraday constant = 9.6485341(30) x 10^7 A-s/kmol
065) speed of light in vacuum = 2.99792458 x 10^8 m/s
066) graviton energy constant = 4.9038802(52) x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2
067) Josephson primary = 2.4179894(88) x 10^14 A-s^2/kg-m^2
068) Josephson q. = 4.8359789(67) x 10^14 A-s^2-rad/kg-m^2-sr
069) electric displacement = 3.9552465(66) x 10^15 A-s/m
070) absorbed dose = 8.987551787… x 10^16 m^2/s^2
071) luminous density = 2.7467669(26) x 10^17 cd-sr-s/m^3
072) gravity displacement = 4.4930470(15) x 10^18 kg-s/m^2
073) molar mass constant = 3.2858629(17) x 10^19 kg/kmol
074) magnetic potential = 1.0209601(87) x 10^20 kg-m/A-s^2
075) thermal conductance = 1.0218040(21) x 10^20 kg-m^2/s^3-K
076) electric current constant = 1.1857530(90) x 10^24 A
077) luminance constant = 1.2018155(94) x 10^24 cd/m^2
078) luminous flux density = 8.2346000(82) x 10^25 cd-sr/m^2
079) Avogadro constant = 6.0221419(79) x 10^26 /kmol
080) gravitational field = 1.3469816(08) x 10^27 kg/m
081) electric potential = 3.0607616(38) x 10^28 kg-m^2/A-s^3
082) electric conductivity = 9.5637446(19) x 10^29 A^2-s^3/kg-m^3
083) Celcius temperature = 3.5518626(82) x 10^32 K
084) graviton wave number = 2.4686709(99) x 10^34 /m
085) mass flow rate constant = 4.0381492(72) x 10^35 kg/s
086) molar energy = 2.9531863(13) x 10^36 kg-m^2/s^2-kmol
087) surface concentration = 1.0119881(80) x 10^42 kmol/m^2
088) graviton frequency = 7.4008894(66) x 10^42 /s
089) superforce constant = 1.2106066(96) x 10^44 kg-m/s^2
090) luminous intensity i. = 5.0709414(41) x 10^44 /cd
091) angular velocity = 1.0141882(87) x 10^45 rad/s
092) electric flux density = 9.7642024(91) x 10^49 A-s/m^2
093) radiant intensity = 5.2968673(52) x 10^50 kg-m^2/s^3-sr
094) graviton field strength = 2.2187308(44) x 10^51 m/s^2
095) superpower constant = 3.6293075(70) x 10^52 kg-m^2/s^3
096) magnetic flux density = 2.5204148(03) x 10^54 kg/A-s^2
097) thermal conductivity = 2.5224979(53) x 10^54 kg-m/s^3-K
098) magnetic field strength = 2.9272342(65) x 10^58 A/m
099) absorbed dose rate = 6.6515877(33) x 10^59 m^2/s^3
100) graviton surface density = 3.3252544(33) x 10^61 kg/m^2
101) electric field strength = 7.5560134(90) x 10^62 kg-m/A-s^3
102) G-D area constant i. = 6.0943364(99) x 10^68 /m^2
103) dynamic viscosity = 9.9688619(97) x 10^69 kg/m-s
104) molar concentration = 2.4982658(70) x 10^76 kmol/m^3
105) surface tension constant= 2.9885896(41) x 10^78 kg/s^2
106) electric charge density = 2.4104603(51) x 10^84 A-s/m^3
107) angular acceleration = 7.5058954(07) x 10^87 rad/s^2
108) thermal transfer = 6.2272175(40) x 10^88 kg/s^3-K
109) electric current density = 7.2263783(36) x 10^92 A/m^2
110) luminous efficacy i. = 2.6860104(16) x 10^95 kg-m^2/cd-sr-s^3
111) graviton density constant = 8.2089591(81) x 10^95 kg/m^3
112) G-D density constant = 1.5044911(77) x 10^103 /m^3
113) radiant density constant = 7.3778445(74) x 10^112 kg/m-s^2
114) radiance constant = 3.2280892(03) x 10^119 kg/s^3-sr
115) irradiance constant = 2.2118221(59) x 10^121 kg/s^3
i. is inverse, q. is quantum
9^9 (387,420,489) Combinations/Equations
http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/
[UPDATED 1998 CODATA-NIST VALUES]
http://groups.msn.com/ArkArchaeology
http://groups.msn.com/Geomagnetism
http://groups.msn.com/Paleomagnetism
.
|
|
| User: "tj Frazir" |
|
| Title: Re: "Weighing the Graviton" |
29 Jul 2003 11:27:09 AM |
|
|
Thatsso fucking ignorant .......
.
|
|
|
| User: "tree" |
|
| Title: Re: "Weighing the Graviton" |
29 Jul 2003 05:36:44 PM |
|
|
(tj Frazir) wrote in message news:<7053-3F26A05D-134@storefull-2153.public.lawson.webtv.net>...
[little snip]
Graviton is atom's cloud having mass, and a greater than we expected
amount of it. Measurement 5.4563026(39) x 10^-8 kg [rsu 3.9 x 10^-8].
Thank you for your comments.
.
|
|
|
| User: "tj Frazir" |
|
| Title: Re: "Weighing the Graviton" dumbsses |
29 Jul 2003 07:05:13 PM |
|
|
Gravity is a push to less energy and dont require mass .
Bent space is a change in energy rates .
AS the universe expands ,,,,matter dont ,,so a low forms around mass (
pit )
YOU do now the universe is expanding dont you ??? Well its energy
pushing it out or it would not expand.
EMF is wave interactions that colide and rase the energy pr pass by nd
lwer energy.
EMF acts like gravity when it takes some energy out with the wave and
the dipole forms from the replacment .
GRAVITY is a push to less energy ,,,not a fucking gravitron ,,,thats
stupid.
SO you dont know what the ***** you messure !
I dont feal the nead to edu U.
WE have known what gravity is for years and years BUT that dont mean
you will understand einstein one little bit.
and a ,,,go SNIP off your head will your snipping
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Ghost In The Machine" |
|
| Title: Re: "Weighing the Graviton" |
30 Jul 2003 04:57:14 AM |
|
|
In sci.physics, tree
<treeharry@hotmail.com>
wrote
on 29 Jul 2003 15:36:44 -0700
<a253f699.0307291436.d28eb3@posting.google.com>:
GravityPhysics@webtv.net (tj Frazir) wrote in message news:<7053-3F26A05D-134@storefull-2153.public.lawson.webtv.net>...
[little snip]
Graviton is atom's cloud having mass, and a greater than we expected
amount of it. Measurement 5.4563026(39) x 10^-8 kg [rsu 3.9 x 10^-8].
That's an awfully heavy thingy, whatever it is.
1 Carbon-12 atom weighs about
(12 * 10^-3 kg) / (6.022 * 10^23) = 1.993 * 10^-26 kg.
Even a particle of 10^20 eV (a phenomenal amount of energy
for a particle, more than 6.2 Joules of energy -- but some
cosmic rays come in with that energy, apparently) would
only weigh about 6.2 J / (3 * 10^8 m/s)^2 = 6.9 * 10^-16 kg.
Thank you for your comments.
--
#191,
It's still legal to go .sigless.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Octa Ex" |
|
| Title: Re: "Weighing the Graviton" |
30 Jul 2003 08:47:14 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:57:14 GMT, The Ghost In The Machine
<ewill@sirius.athghost7038suus.net> scribed these bits:
In sci.physics, tree
<treeharry@hotmail.com>
wrote
on 29 Jul 2003 15:36:44 -0700
<a253f699.0307291436.d28eb3@posting.google.com>:
GravityPhysics@webtv.net (tj Frazir) wrote in message news:<7053-3F26A05D-134@storefull-2153.public.lawson.webtv.net>...
[little snip]
Graviton is atom's cloud having mass, and a greater than we expected
amount of it. Measurement 5.4563026(39) x 10^-8 kg [rsu 3.9 x 10^-8].
That's an awfully heavy thingy, whatever it is.
1 Carbon-12 atom weighs about
(12 * 10^-3 kg) / (6.022 * 10^23) = 1.993 * 10^-26 kg.
Even a particle of 10^20 eV (a phenomenal amount of energy
for a particle, more than 6.2 Joules of energy -- but some
cosmic rays come in with that energy, apparently) would
only weigh about 6.2 J / (3 * 10^8 m/s)^2 = 6.9 * 10^-16 kg.
A high mass graviton could explain the low strength of the
gravitational field.
The electron is supposed to have a much higher charge than e but could
be cloaked by virtual particles. I suppose they would have to be
positive virtual particles to hide the electron charge. Is there any
experimental evidence for a high charge electron?
A high mass particle could be cloaked with a cloud of negative mass,
but it does not sound likely.
The cloud of gravitons surrounding an atom would have to be pretty
sparse by these calculations, only a 10^-18 chance of having a
graviton present at all.
Ignorant about all these things.
X X
X
X X
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: "Weighing the Graviton" |
30 Jul 2003 09:27:43 PM |
|
|
Octa Ex wrote:
[snip]
A high mass graviton could explain the low strength of the
gravitational field.
[snip]
Hey stooopid, if the graviton exists and is massed then gravity has a
small finite range. What is the range of the Strong Force, fool?
Ignorant idiot.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "tj Frazir" |
|
| Title: Re: "Weighing the Graviton" |
30 Jul 2003 09:28:01 PM |
|
|
They had thier thumb on the scale ..
some times I just kill me .....
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: "Weighing the Graviton" |
27 Jul 2003 06:35:57 PM |
|
|
rhastings0419 wrote:
"Weighing the Graviton"
Posted by Denoco Inc. of Texas on Jul 27, 2003 at 15:06
(12.237.89.80)
1) You have not resolved the conflict between General Relatvity
(c=c, G=G, h=0) and quantum mechanics (c=infinity, G=0, h=h).
2) You cannot "weigh" a massless particle, much less one for which
there exists no experimental evidence.
3) You empirically cannot perform self-consistent math - as in
accurate algebraic symbol manipulation.
4) You are a boring ineducable perseverative trolling psychotic.
5) http://w0rli.home.att.net/youare.swf
6) http://b5.sdvc.uwyo.edu/bab5/snds/argcstpd.wav
[snip]
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Ghost In The Machine" |
|
| Title: Weighing the conflict between SR and QM |
28 Jul 2003 10:15:40 AM |
|
|
Note subject change.
In sci.physics, Uncle Al
<UncleAl0@hate.spam.net>
wrote
on Sun, 27 Jul 2003 16:35:57 -0700
<3F2461DD.BA1E3617@hate.spam.net>:
rhastings0419 wrote:
"Weighing the Graviton"
Posted by Denoco Inc. of Texas on Jul 27, 2003 at 15:06
(12.237.89.80)
1) You have not resolved the conflict between General Relatvity
(c=c, G=G, h=0) and quantum mechanics (c=infinity, G=0, h=h).
There's a conflict? :-) I thought someone had written a relativistic
variant of the Schrödinger Equation....? Certainly I saw one
(once) while I was at school in the early 80's...
2) You cannot "weigh" a massless particle, much less one for which
there exists no experimental evidence.
3) You empirically cannot perform self-consistent math - as in
accurate algebraic symbol manipulation.
4) You are a boring ineducable perseverative trolling psychotic.
5) http://w0rli.home.att.net/youare.swf
6) http://b5.sdvc.uwyo.edu/bab5/snds/argcstpd.wav
[snip]
--
#191,
It's still legal to go .sigless.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gregory L. Hansen" |
|
| Title: Re: Weighing the conflict between SR and QM |
28 Jul 2003 10:31:42 AM |
|
|
In article <65nfv-77o.ln1@lexi2.athghost7038suus.net>,
The Ghost In The Machine <ewill@sirius.athghost7038suus.net> wrote:
Note subject change.
In sci.physics, Uncle Al
<UncleAl0@hate.spam.net>
wrote
on Sun, 27 Jul 2003 16:35:57 -0700
<3F2461DD.BA1E3617@hate.spam.net>:
rhastings0419 wrote:
"Weighing the Graviton"
Posted by Denoco Inc. of Texas on Jul 27, 2003 at 15:06
(12.237.89.80)
1) You have not resolved the conflict between General Relatvity
(c=c, G=G, h=0) and quantum mechanics (c=infinity, G=0, h=h).
There's a conflict? :-) I thought someone had written a relativistic
variant of the Schrödinger Equation....? Certainly I saw one
(once) while I was at school in the early 80's...
A special relativistic variant of the Schrödinger equation. And quantum
mechanics is done on classical curved manifolds, e.g. Hawking radiation.
But quantized gravity has been a problem.
--
"A good plan executed right now is far better than a perfect plan
executed next week."
-Gen. George S. Patton
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
