Science > Physics > Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Don1" |
| Date: |
10 Aug 2005 02:07:24 PM |
| Object: |
Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent |
Yes, weight (w) and the rate a body will free fall (g/2=2s/t) are time
and location dependent; but at any particular time and location: A
body's weight (w), divided by the rate at which it will free fall
(g/2=2s/t) is a _constant_: 2w/g=ft^2/s, and is a measure of the body's
inertia.
Don
.
|
|
| User: "C. Bond" |
|
| Title: Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent |
10 Aug 2005 05:01:38 PM |
|
|
Don1 wrote:
Yes, weight (w) and the rate a body will free fall (g/2=2s/t) are time
and location dependent; but at any particular time and location: A
body's weight (w), divided by the rate at which it will free fall
(g/2=2s/t) is a _constant_: 2w/g=ft^2/s, and is a measure of the body's
inertia.
Don
When grazing cows release methane, they lose mass and gain weight. Does
your theory of mass/weight account for this? How about a simple experiment?
Next time you post to a newsgroup (especially an off-topic and redundant
cross-post to sci.math) why don't you weigh yourself before and after? I'll
bet you gain weight!
--
There are two things you must never attempt to prove: the unprovable -- and
the obvious.
--
Democracy: The triumph of popularity over principle.
--
http://www.crbond.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "tj Frazir" |
|
| Title: Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time andlocation... |
12 Aug 2005 08:06:32 AM |
|
|
Evry orbit was affected and the gain in mass is is the same % of evry
atom.
Evry atom falls te same speed V .
Evry atom gained the same % of its own mass.
Any change in all orbit paths is a change in the center of G .
No atom moves unless the center of its G moves.
Evry atoms center of G moved the same.
.
|
|
|
| User: "T Wake" |
|
| Title: Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time andlocation... |
12 Aug 2005 11:11:19 AM |
|
|
"tj Frazir" <GravityPhysics@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:19732-42FC9ED8-323@storefull-3213.bay.webtv.net...
nonsense
Shut up fool.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and locationdependent |
10 Aug 2005 04:57:06 PM |
|
|
Don1 wrote:
[snip crap]
No, fuckwad bumfodder Dumb Donny *****. All local bodies in a
given gravitational field free fall in vacuum identically.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
| User: "Richard Henry" |
|
| Title: Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent |
10 Aug 2005 05:06:31 PM |
|
|
"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:42FA7832.1E45ECF0@hate.spam.net...
Don1 wrote:
[snip crap]
No, fuckwad bumfodder Dumb Donny *****. All local bodies in a
given gravitational field free fall in vacuum identically.
Is that an advance notice of the results of the Eotvos experiment?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and locationdependent |
10 Aug 2005 07:09:13 PM |
|
|
Richard Henry wrote:
"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:42FA7832.1E45ECF0@hate.spam.net...
Don1 wrote:
[snip crap]
No, fuckwad bumfodder Dumb Donny *****. All local bodies in a
given gravitational field free fall in vacuum identically.
Is that an advance notice of the results of the Eotvos experiment?
It is a statement of observed fact as of the date of posting. A
10^(-12) difference/average Equivalence Principle parity violation, if
and when, has no practical significance other than to bring down the
whole of physical theory - General Relativity directly through EP
violation and quantum mechanics through Lorentz Invariance violation
as the demonstrated anisotropy of space. Nobody is going to build
bridges or transistors any differently
I'll ask China how things are proceeding third week of August.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
| User: "Androcles Androcles@ MyPlace.org" |
|
| Title: Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent |
12 Aug 2005 10:26:29 PM |
|
|
"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:42FA9729.97A81D38@hate.spam.net...
[snip crap]
Idiot.
Androcles
.
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Gisse" |
|
| Title: Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent |
13 Aug 2005 12:40:37 AM |
|
|
Androcles wrote:
"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:42FA9729.97A81D38@hate.spam.net...
[snip crap]
Idiot.
Androcles
Damn, I thought you went away because you died.
So much for that.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Androcles Androcles@ MyPlace.org" |
|
| Title: Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent |
13 Aug 2005 04:47:14 AM |
|
|
"Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1123911637.734588.72380@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
|
| Androcles wrote:
| > "Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
| > news:42FA9729.97A81D38@hate.spam.net...
| > [snip crap]
| >
| > Idiot.
| >
| > Androcles
|
| Damn, I thought you went away because you died.
|
| So much for that.
Damn, I hoped you'd die and go away. So much for that.
What's up, moron, don't you like anyone farting in your church?
I'll continue to fart in your church for as long as I can.
Androcles.
.
|
|
|
| User: "tadchem" |
|
| Title: Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent |
13 Aug 2005 09:35:26 AM |
|
|
"Androcles" <Androcles@ MyPlace.org> wrote in message
news:CkjLe.2025$P.1727@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
"Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1123911637.734588.72380@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
|
| Androcles wrote:
| > "Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
| > news:42FA9729.97A81D38@hate.spam.net...
| > [snip crap]
| >
| > Idiot.
| >
| > Androcles
|
| Damn, I thought you went away because you died.
|
| So much for that.
Damn, I hoped you'd die and go away. So much for that.
What's up, moron, don't you like anyone farting in your church?
I'll continue to fart in your church for as long as I can.
Androcles.
Today I find 6 Androcles posts in alt.sci.physics. This is the only one
that does not amount to simply calling Uncle Al an idiot.
I am detecting a pattern here, and it does not flatter you, Androcles.
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
.
|
|
|
| User: "Androcles Androcles@ MyPlace.org" |
|
| Title: Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent |
13 Aug 2005 12:46:31 PM |
|
|
"tadchem" <tadchemNOSPAM@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:c72dnc3yh61Um2PfRVn-1Q@comcast.com...
|
| "Androcles" <Androcles@ MyPlace.org> wrote in message
| news:CkjLe.2025$P.1727@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
| >
| > "Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@gmail.com> wrote in message
| > news:1123911637.734588.72380@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
| > |
| > | Androcles wrote:
| > | > "Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
| > | > news:42FA9729.97A81D38@hate.spam.net...
| > | > [snip crap]
| > | >
| > | > Idiot.
| > | >
| > | > Androcles
| > |
| > | Damn, I thought you went away because you died.
| > |
| > | So much for that.
| >
| > Damn, I hoped you'd die and go away. So much for that.
| > What's up, moron, don't you like anyone farting in your church?
| > I'll continue to fart in your church for as long as I can.
| >
| > Androcles.
|
| Today I find 6 Androcles posts in alt.sci.physics. This is the only
one
| that does not amount to simply calling Uncle Al an idiot.
|
| I am detecting a pattern here, and it does not flatter you, Androcles.
Schwartz knows just enough physics to be dangerous.
As a physicist he'd make a good cook.
As a scientist and mathematician he'd make a good janitor, and
others should be warned.
Any publicity is publicity.
Androcles
.
|
|
|
| User: "tadchem" |
|
| Title: Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent |
13 Aug 2005 09:02:07 PM |
|
|
"Androcles" <Androcles@ MyPlace.org> wrote in message
news:XlqLe.4875$le3.2369@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
"tadchem" <tadchemNOSPAM@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:c72dnc3yh61Um2PfRVn-1Q@comcast.com...
<snip>
| Today I find 6 Androcles posts in alt.sci.physics. This is the only
one
| that does not amount to simply calling Uncle Al an idiot.
|
| I am detecting a pattern here, and it does not flatter you, Androcles.
Schwartz knows just enough physics to be dangerous.
As a physicist he'd make a good cook.
As a scientist and mathematician he'd make a good janitor, and
others should be warned.
Any publicity is publicity.
It is apparent now that you cannot contribute anything beyond ad hominem
attacks.
Where is your physics?
I don't see that you have any.
*plonk*
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
.
|
|
|
| User: "Androcles Androcles@ MyPlace.org" |
|
| Title: Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent |
13 Aug 2005 10:28:51 PM |
|
|
"tadchem" <tadchemNOSPAM@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:IrOdnSCMrvmFO2PfRVn-gg@comcast.com...
|
| "Androcles" <Androcles@ MyPlace.org> wrote in message
| news:XlqLe.4875$le3.2369@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
| >
| > "tadchem" <tadchemNOSPAM@comcast.net> wrote in message
| > news:c72dnc3yh61Um2PfRVn-1Q@comcast.com...
|
| <snip>
|
| > | Today I find 6 Androcles posts in alt.sci.physics. This is the
only
| > one
| > | that does not amount to simply calling Uncle Al an idiot.
| > |
| > | I am detecting a pattern here, and it does not flatter you,
Androcles.
| >
| > Schwartz knows just enough physics to be dangerous.
| > As a physicist he'd make a good cook.
| > As a scientist and mathematician he'd make a good janitor, and
| > others should be warned.
| > Any publicity is publicity.
|
| It is apparent now that you cannot contribute anything beyond ad
hominem
| attacks.
|
| Where is your physics?
|
| I don't see that you have any.
|
| *plonk*
|
|
| Tom Davidson
| Richmond, VA
Where is your physics?
I don't see that you have any.
*plonk*
Androcles
.
|
|
|
| User: "G=EMC^2 Glazier" |
|
| Title: Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time andlocation... |
14 Aug 2005 05:48:17 AM |
|
|
So what else is new. Einstien told us this 100 years ago. Is humankind
this slow in understanding relativity? Bert
.
|
|
|
| User: "Androcles Androcles@ MyPlace.org" |
|
| Title: Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time andlocation... |
14 Aug 2005 11:57:20 AM |
|
|
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" <herbertglazier@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:15114-42FF2171-821@storefull-3332.bay.webtv.net...
| So what else is new. Einstien told us this 100 years ago. Is humankind
| this slow in understanding relativity? Bert
Yes. Well, most are.
[quote]
we establish by definition that the "time" required by light to travel
from A to B equals the "time" it requires to travel from B to A.
[end quote]
Ref: http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
Einstein told us this 100 years ago. Is humankind this slow in
understanding
they've been conned by a dumb definition?
Androcles.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Autymn D. C." |
|
| Title: Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent |
11 Aug 2005 11:58:45 AM |
|
|
I'll let Uncle Alcohol reckon out this puzzle: Three identical bodies
A, B, and C are released from an equipotential over a uniform
planet-ball D. The distance between B and C is shorter than between A
and B and between C and A. How and when will the bodies fall and why?
Measure from the barucentre. This puzzle is pass-fail, for the whole
scientific establishment.
In the meantime, check out this anisotropy:
http://citebase.eprints.org/cgi-bin/citations?id=oai%3AarXiv.org%3Agr-qc%2F9808081.
-Aut
.
|
|
|
| User: "Greg Neill" |
|
| Title: Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent |
11 Aug 2005 02:12:25 PM |
|
|
"Autymn D. C." <lysdexia@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:1123779525.203151.97870@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
I'll let Uncle Alcohol reckon out this puzzle: Three identical bodies
A, B, and C are released from an equipotential over a uniform
planet-ball D. The distance between B and C is shorter than between A
and B and between C and A. How and when will the bodies fall and why?
Measure from the barucentre. This puzzle is pass-fail, for the whole
scientific establishment.
Shall we assume that A, B, and C are test bodies (negligible mass)? :-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Autymn D. C." |
|
| Title: Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent |
12 Aug 2005 06:33:17 AM |
|
|
Greg Neill wrote:
Shall we assume that A, B, and C are test bodies (negligible mass)? :-)
Assume that A, B, and C are of identical substance as D.
-Aut
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "tj Frazir" |
|
| Title: Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time andlocation... |
12 Aug 2005 08:10:49 AM |
|
|
Shure Uncle Dumbfuck Al..
We WILL biuld rockets out of disk beside magnets spun with laser beams
..
Once you understand what gravity is and how it moves atoms.
Untill then ,,your just a dumbfuck.
.
|
|
|
| User: "T Wake" |
|
| Title: Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time andlocation... |
12 Aug 2005 11:11:07 AM |
|
|
"tj Frazir" <GravityPhysics@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:19732-42FC9FD9-324@storefull-3213.bay.webtv.net...
nonsense
You are still an idiot.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent |
10 Aug 2005 02:29:59 PM |
|
|
In article <1123700843.959259.74840@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, "Don1" <dcshead@charter.net> writes:
Yes, weight (w) and the rate a body will free fall (g/2=2s/t) are time
and location dependent; but at any particular time and location: A
body's weight (w), divided by the rate at which it will free fall
(g/2=2s/t) is a _constant_: 2w/g=ft^2/s, and is a measure of the body's
inertia.
Brings to mind a classic quote from Heinlein. I think it's through
the lips of Lazarus Long. Yep, here it is:
"The second way involves telling the truth, too, but is harder: Tell the exact
truth and maybe all of it . . but tell it so unconvincingly that your listener
is sure you are lying."
John Briggs
.
|
|
|
| User: "tadchem" |
|
| Title: Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent |
10 Aug 2005 05:17:35 PM |
|
|
<briggs@encompasserve.org> wrote in message
news:JmYjZaM0VUCM@eisner.encompasserve.org...
<snip>
Brings to mind a classic quote from Heinlein. I think it's through
the lips of Lazarus Long. Yep, here it is:
"The second way involves telling the truth, too, but is harder: Tell the
exact
truth and maybe all of it . . but tell it so unconvincingly that your
listener
is sure you are lying."
I have to work very hard to resist the temptation to make this a political
post.
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
.
|
|
|
| User: "G=EMC^2 Glazier" |
|
| Title: Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time andlocation... |
10 Aug 2005 05:52:20 PM |
|
|
Just go with gravity strength,and don't make it confusing Bert
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mr Pixie" |
|
| Title: Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location dependent |
10 Aug 2005 04:22:00 PM |
|
|
<briggs@encompasserve.org> wrote in message
news:JmYjZaM0VUCM@eisner.encompasserve.org...
In article <1123700843.959259.74840@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, "Don1"
<dcshead@charter.net> writes:
Yes, weight (w) and the rate a body will free fall (g/2=2s/t) are time
and location dependent; but at any particular time and location: A
body's weight (w), divided by the rate at which it will free fall
(g/2=2s/t) is a _constant_: 2w/g=ft^2/s, and is a measure of the body's
inertia.
Brings to mind a classic quote from Heinlein. I think it's through
the lips of Lazarus Long. Yep, here it is:
"The second way involves telling the truth, too, but is harder: Tell the
exact
truth and maybe all of it . . but tell it so unconvincingly that your
listener
is sure you are lying."
John Briggs
He's just saying that
g/2=2s/t
and
2w/g=ft^2/s
both contain the variable t
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
