| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Nomen Nescio" |
| Date: |
26 Jan 2004 03:30:02 AM |
| Object: |
What are you Kolker an evil sadistic *****? |
Course I can prove my claims. They were already proven when you said they werent. Therefore I am proven!
--------------------------
GRAVITYMECHANIC2 wrote:
The universe has been found to be expanding at an
accelerating rate as predicted in 1984 by this new
theory.
So you say. Where were the predictions published? Was your theory
checked for consistency? Was your theory checked to see whether it made
any incorrect predictions? Is your theory consistent with all
experimentally verified obsevations about gravity. Where, when and by
whom was it checked?
Anyone can make claims. Can you prove them. If so, do.
Bob Kolker
-------------------------
.
|
|
| User: "Robert J. Kolker" |
|
| Title: Re: What are you Kolker an evil sadistic *****? |
26 Jan 2004 07:09:50 AM |
|
|
Nomen Nescio wrote:
Course I can prove my claims. They were already proven when you
said they werent. Therefore I am proven!
Cite the refereed journal and the experiments that prove your claims.
Bob Kolker
.
|
|
|
| User: "R.Schenck" |
|
| Title: Re: What are you Kolker an evil sadistic *****? |
27 Jan 2004 01:23:53 PM |
|
|
"Robert J. Kolker" <bobkolker@NOSPAMcomcast.net> wrote in message news:<yk8Rb.26165$U%5.176746@attbi_s03>...
Nomen Nescio wrote:
Course I can prove my claims. They were already proven when you
said they werent. Therefore I am proven!
Cite the refereed journal and the experiments that prove your claims.
Bob Kolker
S. Perlmutter et al. (1998), presentation at the January 1998 Meeting
of the American Astronomical Society, Washington, D.C., LBL Report
Number LBL-42230; referenced in B.A.A.S., Volume 29, page 1351 (1997);
astro-ph/9812473; S. Perlmutter et al., Astrophysical Journal, 517:
565-586 (1999); astro-ph/9812133.
from http://www.er.doe.gov/Sub/Accomplishments/Decades_Discovery/43.html
here is a news article about it reported in Science
http://www-tech.mit.edu/V118/N8/bexpand.8w.html
here are some from Nature:
http://www.nature.com/nsu/030630/030630-7.html
http://makeashorterlink.com/?U2CF11537
http://makeashorterlink.com/?W2BF22537
wasn't all of this widely reported? its difficult to say what parts of
a science are in the more public areas. i recall the birds aer
descended from dinosaurs thing was going on for a long time in the
paleonotlogical literature, but has now moved into the public sphere.
its like they save about government techonology, they are 10 years
ahead of what they publiclly reveal (ala stealth technology)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
