| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"PD" |
| Date: |
30 Dec 2005 04:57:33 PM |
| Object: |
What cranks have been run out of this group? |
Haven't heard from these fellas in a while
1. TomGee (Thomas Garcia)
2. Marcel Luttgens
3. Monitek
4. paulps
Unfortunately, we've lost
A. Franz Heymann
B. Uncle Al
Who else?
.
|
|
| User: "Phil Holman piholmanc@yourservice" |
|
| Title: Re: What cranks have been run out of this group? |
31 Dec 2005 04:14:28 PM |
|
|
"PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1135983453.736912.16900@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Haven't heard from these fellas in a while
1. TomGee (Thomas Garcia)
2. Marcel Luttgens
3. Monitek
4. paulps
Unfortunately, we've lost
A. Franz Heymann
B. Uncle Al
Who else
Bill Vajk...........nothing unfortunate about that.
Phil H
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "John" |
|
| Title: Re: What cranks have been run out of this group? |
30 Dec 2005 09:29:08 PM |
|
|
"PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1135983453.736912.16900@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Haven't heard from these fellas in a while
1. TomGee (Thomas Garcia)
2. Marcel Luttgens
3. Monitek
4. paulps
Unfortunately, we've lost
A. Franz Heymann
B. Uncle Al
Who else?
Troll
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Schutkeker" |
|
| Title: Re: What cranks have been run out of this group? |
06 Jan 2006 09:50:50 PM |
|
|
"John" <spamless@invalid.com> wrote in news:43b5fae9$0$1368$892e7fe2
@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net:
"PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1135983453.736912.16900@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Haven't heard from these fellas in a while
1. TomGee (Thomas Garcia)
2. Marcel Luttgens
3. Monitek
4. paulps
Unfortunately, we've lost
A. Franz Heymann
B. Uncle Al
Who else?
Troll
If he's a troll, he started an interesting thread. We need more trolls
like this.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dirk Van de moortel" |
|
| Title: Re: What cranks have been run out of this group? |
03 Jan 2006 01:38:48 PM |
|
|
"PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1135983453.736912.16900@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Haven't heard from these fellas in a while
1. TomGee (Thomas Garcia)
2. Marcel Luttgens
3. Monitek
4. paulps
Unfortunately, we've lost
A. Franz Heymann
B. Uncle Al
Who else?
I think that both Androcles and Ken Tucker will cirose their
livers in 2006.
Dirk Vdm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: What cranks have been run out of this group? |
03 Jan 2006 01:44:13 PM |
|
|
Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
"PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1135983453.736912.16900@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Haven't heard from these fellas in a while
1. TomGee (Thomas Garcia)
2. Marcel Luttgens
3. Monitek
4. paulps
Unfortunately, we've lost
A. Franz Heymann
B. Uncle Al
Who else?
I think that both Androcles and Ken Tucker will cirose their
livers in 2006.
Dirk Vdm
We do make their livers jump a lot!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Traveler" |
|
| Title: Re: What cranks have been run out of this group? |
03 Jan 2006 03:14:31 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 03 Jan 2006 19:44:13 GMT, Samantha Wormley
<swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote:
***** Van de merde wrote:
[crap]
We do make their livers jump a lot!
ahahaha... "We?" ahahaha... One ***** kisser kissing another *****
kisser's *****. Priceless! ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
Louis Savain
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ken S. Tucker" |
|
| Title: Re: What cranks have been run out of this group? |
04 Jan 2006 02:30:57 PM |
|
|
Traveler wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jan 2006 19:44:13 GMT, Samantha Wormley
<swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote:
***** Van de merde wrote:
[crap]
We do make their livers jump a lot!
ahahaha... "We?" ahahaha... One ***** kisser kissing another *****
kisser's *****. Priceless! ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
Louis Savain
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
Yup good point...
VD we know, but I'll *never* figure Sam for an anal kisser,
he's got good -sometimes comic style, and to important
to insult.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ken S. Tucker" |
|
| Title: Re: What cranks have been run out of this group? |
03 Jan 2006 01:59:32 PM |
|
|
Sam Wormley wrote:
We do make their livers jump a lot!
LOL
Damn I thought I was Kill-filed, how much does
it take to acquire that honor? And PLEASE note
I keep me same handle to make that very easy.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Schutkeker" |
|
| Title: Re: What cranks have been run out of this group? |
06 Jan 2006 09:41:57 PM |
|
|
"PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote in news:1135983453.736912.16900
@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Unfortunately, we've lost
A. Franz Heymann
B. Uncle Al
It occurs to me that somebody could have a heart attack, and we'd never
find out about it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Der alte Hexenmeister" |
|
| Title: Re: What cranks have been run out of this group? |
07 Jan 2006 06:10:50 AM |
|
|
"John Schutkeker" <jschutkeker@sbcglobal.net.nospam> wrote in message
news:Xns9743E51F8B765lkajehoriuasldfjknak@207.115.17.102...
"PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote in news:1135983453.736912.16900
@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Unfortunately, we've lost
A. Franz Heymann
B. Uncle Al
It occurs to me that somebody could have a heart attack, and we'd never
find out about it.
Uncle Al was run out, screaming "River if *****, FOaD". Aesop called
that "Sour Grapes"
Heymann died.
Draper:
I have to admit that I am demoralized at the moment.
I had hoped that we could fight ignorance with a proactive rather
than a reactive approach, but this is clearly the improper forum for
that. A quick survey of the length of threads initiated by or
drifting
to nonsense compared to the length of threads based on sound thinking
reveals the true interest in the proposal.
While it would be a useful project to contribute to the FAQ, the
intent was to educate in the context of discussion, a virtual
"classroom" if you will. There's no point in contributing to a
reference that none of the "students" will read or attempt to learn
from. The intention was to focus on *exactly* what is wrong in
someone's thinking (which varies from person to person), set it
straight, and then make progress from there.
I had high hopes -- really -- that perhaps one misguided soul would
read something sensible and say, "Oh... Really?...Oh. I see I was
confused. OK, I get it now. Now what about...?" My head knew better,
my heart does not.
[sitting in the duck blind, waiting with a shotgun for a duck to
appear]
PD
========================
or this?
========================
Draper:
Androcles, in your case, I will get over my disenchantment.
But I want this to be a fruitful exchange between the two of us, so
let's agree on some ground rules. We'll go things one little step
at a
time. When we get to a point of conflict, we'll identify what the
error is on either side, and the party in error MUST acknowledge
the
error and remove the erroneous statement from further discussion.
=========================
Androcles:
I'll agree to your terms.
My terms:
Either one of us could inadvertantly make a typographical error
or simple arithmetic error, and should correct it if noticed.
I'd require: the error to be acknowledged and corrected; the
discussion continued until I have convince you or you have
convinced me. Failing to respond in a reasonable time
is a Pyrrhic victory and unsatisfactory. The penalty for failing
to respond is to be hounded by me at any time I choose.
==========================
Then you caved in and ran away, and here you are back again, after
all the work I did, with not so much as a
"party in error MUST acknowledge the error" or a
"Oh... Really?...Oh. I see I was confused. OK, I get it now."
Google remembers it very well.
Androcles.
Hexenmeister, still trying to run out the hypocritical crank Phuckwit Duck.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Ghost In The Machine" |
|
| Title: Re: What cranks have been run out of this group? |
30 Dec 2005 07:00:10 PM |
|
|
In sci.physics, PD
<TheDraperFamily@gmail.com>
wrote
on 30 Dec 2005 14:57:33 -0800
<1135983453.736912.16900@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>:
Haven't heard from these fellas in a while
1. TomGee (Thomas Garcia)
2. Marcel Luttgens
3. Monitek
4. paulps
Unfortunately, we've lost
A. Franz Heymann
B. Uncle Al
Who else?
Not bad. 4-2 for the good guys. :-) 4-3 if one counts Frodo Morris.
(At least, I think that was his name. Last I heard he had finished
work on an experiment using Fe-57 and gamma rays that could detect
movements of a few millimeters per hour.)
A pity, for he was anything but a troll, AFAICT.
Sigh.
--
#191,
It's still legal to go .sigless.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John" |
|
| Title: Re: What cranks have been run out of this group? |
30 Dec 2005 09:29:24 PM |
|
|
"The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@sirius.tg00suus7038.net> wrote in message
news:jcvg83-i0s.ln1@sirius.tg00suus7038.net...
Troll
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: What cranks have been run out of this group? |
30 Dec 2005 07:04:14 PM |
|
|
One man's crank is another man's General Systems Thinker.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bret Cahill" |
|
| Title: Re: What cranks have been run out of this group? |
07 Jan 2006 08:28:24 AM |
|
|
I'm always miffed that I never make these lists.
What am I NOT doing?
Bret Cahill
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Traveler" |
|
| Title: Re: What cranks have been run out of this group? |
30 Dec 2005 09:20:17 PM |
|
|
On 30 Dec 2005 14:57:33 -0800, "PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote:
Haven't heard from these fellas in a while
1. TomGee (Thomas Garcia)
2. Marcel Luttgens
3. Monitek
4. paulps
ahahah... sci.physics needs all the cranks, alternative thinkers,
barbarians and crackpots it can get. Bring them all in. The mainstream
***** kissers are needed only so they can be laughed at for being so
fucking boring. ahahaha...
Unfortunately, we've lost
A. Franz Heymann
B. Uncle Al
This is funny. Franz Heymann never understood that nothing can move in
spacetime and Uncle ***** has some stupid idea that he can break
the equivalence principle using crystals. ahahaha... And you chose
those two idiots to kiss their asses? Make sense. ahahaha... You have
no shame, PD. Great way to end the year: kissing ***** in public.
ahahaha...
And BTW, does PD stands for pederast or pedophile? ahahahaha...
AHAHAHA... ahahahaha... Happy new year anyway. I like your sense of
humor. ahaha...
Louis Savain
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ken S. Tucker" |
|
| Title: Re: What cranks have been run out of this group? |
03 Jan 2006 01:24:39 PM |
|
|
PD wrote:
Haven't heard from these fellas in a while
1. TomGee (Thomas Garcia)
2. Marcel Luttgens
3. Monitek
4. paulps
Unfortunately, we've lost
A. Franz Heymann
B. Uncle Al
Who else?
A few years back a crank named "Speicher" claims he's
leaving sp because of me, but the best was JosX, that
guy was ascii brilliant.
Ken
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: What cranks have been run out of this group? |
04 Jan 2006 07:58:31 AM |
|
|
[piggy-backing post]
In article <1136316279.168137.78020@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"Ken S. Tucker" <dynamics@vianet.on.ca> wrote:
PD wrote:
Haven't heard from these fellas in a while
1. TomGee (Thomas Garcia)
2. Marcel Luttgens
3. Monitek
4. paulps
Unfortunately, we've lost
A. Franz Heymann
B. Uncle Al
Who else?
John Baez
Jim Carr
Ed Green
A couple of people whose
posting names I can't remember
but threw in quality posts, one is
a farmer; I'm not sure what the others
did.
Jon Bell
Anybody who used to or is a monitor of s.p.r.
I suspect Mati Meron.
/BAH
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "David Thomson" |
|
| Title: Re: What cranks have been run out of this group? |
31 Dec 2005 11:48:30 AM |
|
|
PD wrote:
Haven't heard from these fellas in a while
1. TomGee (Thomas Garcia)
2. Marcel Luttgens
3. Monitek
4. paulps
Unfortunately, we've lost
A. Franz Heymann
B. Uncle Al
Unfortunately? No wonder the newsgroups have seemed so much more
civilized lately. I thought I was just getting lucky to not read their
posts. Actually Franz was civilized, but Al definitely was not.
Science progresses one death at a time. As those of us who were the
youth with alternative views on physics rise in the ladder of time, we
will be seen more as visionaries and less as revolutionaries. In the
end, our ideas will be judged on their merits and not merely by the
prejudice of those who resist change.
Dave
.
|
|
|
| User: "PD" |
|
| Title: Re: What cranks have been run out of this group? |
01 Jan 2006 01:23:51 PM |
|
|
David Thomson wrote:
PD wrote:
Haven't heard from these fellas in a while
1. TomGee (Thomas Garcia)
2. Marcel Luttgens
3. Monitek
4. paulps
Unfortunately, we've lost
A. Franz Heymann
B. Uncle Al
Unfortunately? No wonder the newsgroups have seemed so much more
civilized lately. I thought I was just getting lucky to not read their
posts. Actually Franz was civilized, but Al definitely was not.
There are those who suffer fools gladly and those who do not. There are
some who think this group is for the purpose of suffering fools gladly.
There are some who think the point is to discuss physics, what is
known, what is not known. Uncle Al definitely thought this is what the
group should be about and not for suffering fools gladly. Though I
don't take the same approach that he does, I can't fault him for his
physics.
PD
Science progresses one death at a time. As those of us who were the
youth with alternative views on physics rise in the ladder of time, we
will be seen more as visionaries and less as revolutionaries. In the
end, our ideas will be judged on their merits and not merely by the
prejudice of those who resist change.
Dave
You have excluded the category that those who were seen as deluded will
be borne out as deluded and eventually be forgotten.
PD
.
|
|
|
| User: "Traveler" |
|
| Title: Re: What cranks have been run out of this group? |
01 Jan 2006 02:02:43 PM |
|
|
On 1 Jan 2006 11:23:51 -0800, "PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote:
David Thomson wrote:
PD wrote:
Haven't heard from these fellas in a while
1. TomGee (Thomas Garcia)
2. Marcel Luttgens
3. Monitek
4. paulps
Unfortunately, we've lost
A. Franz Heymann
B. Uncle Al
Unfortunately? No wonder the newsgroups have seemed so much more
civilized lately. I thought I was just getting lucky to not read their
posts. Actually Franz was civilized, but Al definitely was not.
There are those who suffer fools gladly and those who do not. There are
some who think this group is for the purpose of suffering fools gladly.
There are some who think the point is to discuss physics, what is
known, what is not known. Uncle Al definitely thought this is what the
group should be about and not for suffering fools gladly. Though I
don't take the same approach that he does, I can't fault him for his
physics.
ahahaha... The most dangerous fools are the ones who have succeeded in
convincing the world that they have a monopoly on knowledge creation
and dissemination. When the blind leads the blind and all that...
ahahaha... AHAHAHAHA... ahahaha...
Louis Savain
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "PD" |
|
| Title: Re: What cranks have been run out of this group? |
01 Jan 2006 02:58:32 PM |
|
|
Traveler wrote:
On 1 Jan 2006 11:23:51 -0800, "PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote:
David Thomson wrote:
PD wrote:
Haven't heard from these fellas in a while
1. TomGee (Thomas Garcia)
2. Marcel Luttgens
3. Monitek
4. paulps
Unfortunately, we've lost
A. Franz Heymann
B. Uncle Al
Unfortunately? No wonder the newsgroups have seemed so much more
civilized lately. I thought I was just getting lucky to not read their
posts. Actually Franz was civilized, but Al definitely was not.
There are those who suffer fools gladly and those who do not. There are
some who think this group is for the purpose of suffering fools gladly.
There are some who think the point is to discuss physics, what is
known, what is not known. Uncle Al definitely thought this is what the
group should be about and not for suffering fools gladly. Though I
don't take the same approach that he does, I can't fault him for his
physics.
ahahaha... The most dangerous fools are the ones who have succeeded in
convincing the world that they have a monopoly on knowledge creation
and dissemination. When the blind leads the blind and all that...
ahahaha... AHAHAHAHA... ahahaha...
There are simple ways to demonstrate that your science, Louis, is not
crap science. That doesn't include sucking up to the prevailing wisdom.
However, you haven't demonstrated anything of the kind.
PD
.
|
|
|
| User: "Der alte Hexenmeister" |
|
| Title: Re: What cranks have been run out of this group? |
01 Jan 2006 03:51:34 PM |
|
|
"PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1136149112.857064.201410@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Traveler wrote:
On 1 Jan 2006 11:23:51 -0800, "PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote:
David Thomson wrote:
PD wrote:
Haven't heard from these fellas in a while
1. TomGee (Thomas Garcia)
2. Marcel Luttgens
3. Monitek
4. paulps
Unfortunately, we've lost
A. Franz Heymann
B. Uncle Al
Unfortunately? No wonder the newsgroups have seemed so much more
civilized lately. I thought I was just getting lucky to not read
their
posts. Actually Franz was civilized, but Al definitely was not.
There are those who suffer fools gladly and those who do not. There are
some who think this group is for the purpose of suffering fools gladly.
There are some who think the point is to discuss physics, what is
known, what is not known. Uncle Al definitely thought this is what the
group should be about and not for suffering fools gladly. Though I
don't take the same approach that he does, I can't fault him for his
physics.
ahahaha... The most dangerous fools are the ones who have succeeded in
convincing the world that they have a monopoly on knowledge creation
and dissemination. When the blind leads the blind and all that...
ahahaha... AHAHAHAHA... ahahaha...
There are simple ways to demonstrate that your science, Louis, is not
crap science. That doesn't include sucking up to the prevailing wisdom.
However, you haven't demonstrated anything of the kind.
PD
Hey crank!
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Sagnac.JPG
Der alte Hexenmeister.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Traveler" |
|
| Title: Re: What cranks have been run out of this group? |
01 Jan 2006 10:44:51 PM |
|
|
On 1 Jan 2006 12:58:32 -0800, "PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote:
Traveler wrote:
On 1 Jan 2006 11:23:51 -0800, "PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote:
David Thomson wrote:
PD wrote:
Haven't heard from these fellas in a while
1. TomGee (Thomas Garcia)
2. Marcel Luttgens
3. Monitek
4. paulps
Unfortunately, we've lost
A. Franz Heymann
B. Uncle Al
Unfortunately? No wonder the newsgroups have seemed so much more
civilized lately. I thought I was just getting lucky to not read their
posts. Actually Franz was civilized, but Al definitely was not.
There are those who suffer fools gladly and those who do not. There are
some who think this group is for the purpose of suffering fools gladly.
There are some who think the point is to discuss physics, what is
known, what is not known. Uncle Al definitely thought this is what the
group should be about and not for suffering fools gladly. Though I
don't take the same approach that he does, I can't fault him for his
physics.
ahahaha... The most dangerous fools are the ones who have succeeded in
convincing the world that they have a monopoly on knowledge creation
and dissemination. When the blind leads the blind and all that...
ahahaha... AHAHAHAHA... ahahaha...
There are simple ways to demonstrate that your science, Louis, is not
crap science. That doesn't include sucking up to the prevailing wisdom.
However, you haven't demonstrated anything of the kind.
I never claimed to have demonstrated anything other than the
crackpottery (including unmasking a bunch of notorious crackpots) that
is inherent in YOUR science. I enjoy doing it and I will continue to
do it because it's fun. ahaha... Yeah, it's an in-your-face kind of
crackpottery too: Time travel, dimensions curled up into little
fucking balls, particles following their geodesics in curved
spacetime, zillions of parallel universes forking at every instant,
virtual particles, every position in the universe is relative, etc...
ahahaha... It's fucking hilarious and pathetic at the same time.
ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha... Phew! Physics is so much phucking
phun. ahahaha...
Louis Savain
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Happy Hippy" |
|
| Title: Re: What cranks have been run out of this group? |
04 Jan 2006 01:27:06 PM |
|
|
Traveler wrote:
I never claimed to have demonstrated anything other than the
crackpottery (including unmasking a bunch of notorious crackpots) that
is inherent in YOUR science. I enjoy doing it and I will continue to
do it because it's fun. ahaha... Yeah, it's an in-your-face kind of
crackpottery too: Time travel, dimensions curled up into little
fucking balls, particles following their geodesics in curved
spacetime, zillions of parallel universes forking at every instant,
virtual particles, every position in the universe is relative, etc...
ahahaha... It's fucking hilarious and pathetic at the same time.
ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha... Phew! Physics is so much phucking
phun. ahahaha...
Louis Savain
Time travel? Hmmm.
Little balls dimensions? Galaxy theory has electrons being
made of millions of suns and planets that are equally-detailed
as ours, including having intelligent life.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/john/
Complexity being infinite at all levels, this level is also
atoms with electrons made from material that is equally so small
as to be 'in another dimension'. So what? This can
be carried on forever, not just 26 dimensions or whatever
the strung theorists quiver.
Particles? Yes, at size levels in the 'middle of' a size dimension,
like where the atoms are in the form of planets, meteors, etc.
Parallel universes? Do you know what 'universe' means?
Relative positions? Ever throw a twig in the stream?
Ever race with toothpicks when the snow is melting?
How important is the presence of the other toothpick?
(Unless it's right in your face!)
John
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "PD" |
|
| Title: Re: What cranks have been run out of this group? |
03 Jan 2006 05:59:18 PM |
|
|
Traveler wrote:
On 1 Jan 2006 12:58:32 -0800, "PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote:
Traveler wrote:
On 1 Jan 2006 11:23:51 -0800, "PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote:
David Thomson wrote:
PD wrote:
Haven't heard from these fellas in a while
1. TomGee (Thomas Garcia)
2. Marcel Luttgens
3. Monitek
4. paulps
Unfortunately, we've lost
A. Franz Heymann
B. Uncle Al
Unfortunately? No wonder the newsgroups have seemed so much more
civilized lately. I thought I was just getting lucky to not read their
posts. Actually Franz was civilized, but Al definitely was not.
There are those who suffer fools gladly and those who do not. There are
some who think this group is for the purpose of suffering fools gladly.
There are some who think the point is to discuss physics, what is
known, what is not known. Uncle Al definitely thought this is what the
group should be about and not for suffering fools gladly. Though I
don't take the same approach that he does, I can't fault him for his
physics.
ahahaha... The most dangerous fools are the ones who have succeeded in
convincing the world that they have a monopoly on knowledge creation
and dissemination. When the blind leads the blind and all that...
ahahaha... AHAHAHAHA... ahahaha...
There are simple ways to demonstrate that your science, Louis, is not
crap science. That doesn't include sucking up to the prevailing wisdom.
However, you haven't demonstrated anything of the kind.
I never claimed to have demonstrated anything other than the
crackpottery (including unmasking a bunch of notorious crackpots) that
is inherent in YOUR science. I enjoy doing it and I will continue to
do it because it's fun. ahaha... Yeah, it's an in-your-face kind of
crackpottery too: Time travel, dimensions curled up into little
fucking balls, particles following their geodesics in curved
spacetime, zillions of parallel universes forking at every instant,
virtual particles, every position in the universe is relative, etc...
ahahaha... It's fucking hilarious and pathetic at the same time.
ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha... Phew! Physics is so much phucking
phun. ahahaha...
Yes, I know what you do. It is called heckling. Heckling is what
amateurs do, and they do it because they think it is fun. Teenagers who
smash in mailboxes do it because they think it is fun. Grafitti
painters, especially crappy ones, spray paint stuff because they think
it is fun. Same for the kids who use a penknife to carve obscenities on
their schooldesks and on bathroom stalls.
You go right on doing what you're doing. Nice of you to sign your work.
PD
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gregory L. Hansen" |
|
| Title: Re: What cranks have been run out of this group? |
03 Jan 2006 09:33:15 PM |
|
|
In article <1136332758.395919.327200@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
PD <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote:
Traveler wrote:
Grafitti
painters, especially crappy ones, spray paint stuff because they think
it is fun. Same for the kids who use a penknife to carve obscenities on
their schooldesks and on bathroom stalls.
Why grafitti? Why tag? Why must everyone know that Kilroy was here?
Same reason a dog pees on a tree. Not only do animals have higher thought
processes than some people want to admit, people are closer to animals
than they want to admit, too.
--
"The main, if not the only, function of the word aether has been to
furnish a nominative case to the verb 'to undulate'."
-- the Earl of Salisbury, 1894
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: What cranks have been run out of this group? |
04 Jan 2006 07:59:44 AM |
|
|
In article <dpfflr$3m8$1@rainier.uits.indiana.edu>,
(Gregory L. Hansen) wrote:
In article <1136332758.395919.327200@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
PD <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote:
Traveler wrote:
Grafitti
painters, especially crappy ones, spray paint stuff because they think
it is fun. Same for the kids who use a penknife to carve obscenities on
their schooldesks and on bathroom stalls.
Why grafitti? Why tag? Why must everyone know that Kilroy was here?
Same reason a dog pees on a tree. Not only do animals have higher thought
processes than some people want to admit, people are closer to animals
than they want to admit, too.
Yep. Male humans do the same thing (pee to mark territory).
/BAH
.
|
|
|
| User: "Traveler" |
|
| Title: Re: What cranks have been run out of this group? |
04 Jan 2006 10:18:52 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 04 Jan 06 13:59:44 GMT, wrote:
In article <dpfflr$3m8$1@rainier.uits.indiana.edu>,
glhansen@steel.ucs.indiana.edu (Gregory L. Hansen) wrote:
In article <1136332758.395919.327200@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
PD <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote:
Traveler wrote:
Grafitti
painters, especially crappy ones, spray paint stuff because they think
it is fun. Same for the kids who use a penknife to carve obscenities on
their schooldesks and on bathroom stalls.
Why grafitti? Why tag? Why must everyone know that Kilroy was here?
Same reason a dog pees on a tree. Not only do animals have higher thought
processes than some people want to admit, people are closer to animals
than they want to admit, too.
Yep. Male humans do the same thing (pee to mark territory).
Which is essential to species survival and population control. The
females have other things to worry about that are equally essential to
survival. ahahaha... But kidding aside, I have never seen human males
***** to mark territory. You must be referring to a deep fetish of
yours. Is Uncle ***** somehow included in your fantasies?
ahahaha... AHAHAHA...
Having said that, you seem or prefer not to notice another survival
trait of most animals which is also present in humans (both male and
female). It's called ***** kissing. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
Physics is so much phucking phun! ahahaha...
Louis Savain
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "hanson" |
|
| Title: Re: What cranks have been run out of this group? |
04 Jan 2006 03:04:53 PM |
|
|
"Traveler" <traveler@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:dtsnr1pm6gt9ngsk7mfg7qkssif4ubmp25@4ax.com...
Traveler wrote:
Grafitti
painters, especially crappy ones, spray paint stuff because they think
it is fun. Same for the kids who use a penknife to carve obscenities on
their schooldesks and on bathroom stalls.
In article <dpfflr$3m8$1@rainier.uits.indiana.edu>,
glhansen@steel.ucs.indiana.edu (Gregory L. Hansen) wrote:
Why grafitti? Why tag? Why must everyone know that Kilroy was here?
Same reason a dog pees on a tree. Not only do animals have higher thought
processes than some people want to admit, people are closer to animals
than they want to admit, too.
On Wed, 04 Jan 06 13:59:44 GMT, wrote:
Yep. Male humans do the same thing (pee to mark territory).
[hanson]
Males.. Shmales, Shemales?.... since you, Becky/BHA, said that:
"Standing is my preferred position"... ahahaha... Bulldyke? ... ahaha..
[Traveler]
Which is essential to species survival and population control. The
females have other things to worry about that are equally essential to
survival. ahahaha... But kidding aside, I have never seen human males
***** to mark territory. You must be referring to a deep fetish of
yours. Is Uncle ***** somehow included in your fantasies?
ahahaha... AHAHAHA...
Having said that, you seem or prefer not to notice another survival
trait of most animals which is also present in humans (both male and
female). It's called ***** kissing. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
Physics is so much phucking phun! ahahaha...
Louis Savain
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Traveler" |
|
| Title: Re: What cranks have been run out of this group? |
03 Jan 2006 09:44:45 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 03:33:15 +0000 (UTC),
glhansen@steel.ucs.indiana.edu (Gregory L. Hansen) wrote:
In article <1136332758.395919.327200@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
PD <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote:
Traveler wrote:
Grafitti
painters, especially crappy ones, spray paint stuff because they think
it is fun. Same for the kids who use a penknife to carve obscenities on
their schooldesks and on bathroom stalls.
Why grafitti? Why tag? Why must everyone know that Kilroy was here?
Same reason a dog pees on a tree. Not only do animals have higher thought
processes than some people want to admit, people are closer to animals
than they want to admit, too.
ahahaha... You just can't let an oportunity to kiss ***** go unchecked,
eh, Hanson? How much ***** did you have to kiss in your doctoral thesis?
Inquiring minds and all that. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha... Physics
is so much phucking phun! ahahaha...
Louis Savain
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
