| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
20 Sep 2005 11:32:18 AM |
| Object: |
What is dark matter |
Jack Scarfetti keeps posting on the Warp drive. It requires dark
matter, dark expansive matter. I would lke to know :-
1) As the precise nature of dark matter is not yet understood by
physicists how does he actually propose to create it and manipulate it?
Various methods like the coherent Josephson effect have been proposed
but there seems little evdence that this would effectively create
anything.
2) Why is the Casimir effect any different, in principle, from the
virtual photons in elecomagnetic forces? How can it create vast amounts
of matter of energy. In The Josephson effect he talks about "natural
frequencies". What evidence is there for these?
3) If we got negative mass would there not be a danger of Inflation?
Would we have an aircraft we could fight in without a G suit, or would
we have a doomsday machine?
4) What progress is being made towards a fundamental understanding of
dark matter? Everything seems so very tentative.
.
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: What is dark matter |
20 Sep 2005 01:17:32 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Jack Scarfetti keeps posting on the Warp drive.
[snip]
Jacko posting is like the antiaircraft defense of Baghdad during Gulf
War I. Millions of shots fired, no hits. US munitions simply flew
slow, straight, and true to their targets, and then back if manned.
Jacko is whacko but not interesting. That is rather a difficult
combination to achieve.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
| User: "NunYa Bidness" |
|
| Title: Re: What is dark matter |
20 Sep 2005 01:29:00 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 11:17:32 -0700, Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net>
Gave us:
ianparker2@gmail.com wrote:
Jack Scarfetti keeps posting on the Warp drive.
[snip]
Jacko posting is like the antiaircraft defense of Baghdad during Gulf
War I. Millions of shots fired, no hits. US munitions simply flew
slow, straight, and true to their targets, and then back if manned.
Jacko is whacko but not interesting. That is rather a difficult
combination to achieve.
He has a warped drive.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: What is dark matter |
23 Sep 2005 05:52:24 AM |
|
|
What I personally find disconcerting about Jack is that he never
replies to replies on his posting. I made remarks about the warp drive
along the lines of negative energy and Inflation. I replied to his
posting on Tachyons with a posting on Feynman diagrams which ensured
the consistency.
Neither of the points in the postings can be regarded as trivial. They
may be wrong, but they deserve discussion. I must say I expected a
devastating reply, what we all got was a reposting which completely
ignored all the points made.
I'm not sure about the ethics of repeated postings. There are other
important topics that folks might wish to discuss.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Baez" |
|
| Title: Re: What is dark matter |
04 Nov 2005 08:46:31 PM |
|
|
In article <1127472744.903676.262150@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
<ianparker2@gmail.com> wrote:
What I personally find disconcerting about Jack is that he never
replies to replies on his posting.
What I find disconcerting is that he seems to seriously believe that
at the age of 13 he got a phone call from a "conscious computer aboard a
spaceship from the future":
http://www.qedcorp.com/pcr/pcr/parsifal.html
The fact that he rarely replies to newsgroup posts is less disconcerting.
.
|
|
|
| User: "FrediFizzx" |
|
| Title: Re: What is dark matter |
05 Nov 2005 12:42:33 AM |
|
|
"John Baez" <baez@galaxy.ucr.edu> wrote in message
news:dkh6e7$l4l$1@glue.ucr.edu...
| In article <1127472744.903676.262150@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
| <ianparker2@gmail.com> wrote:
|
| >What I personally find disconcerting about Jack is that he never
| >replies to replies on his posting.
|
| What I find disconcerting is that he seems to seriously believe that
| at the age of 13 he got a phone call from a "conscious computer aboard
a
| spaceship from the future":
|
| http://www.qedcorp.com/pcr/pcr/parsifal.html
Jack's no dummy. He is not trying to sell books to physicists. There
is a lot more non-physicists.
| The fact that he rarely replies to newsgroup posts is less
disconcerting.
He will reply to posts on his,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sarfatti_Physics_Seminars/
Which has most all his spams to Usenet; if anyone cares. Not sure why
he calls it "Seminars", since I don't see much of any seminars going on.
;-)
FrediFizzx
http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/quantum_vacuum_charge.pdf
or postscript
http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/quantum_vacuum_charge.ps
http://www.vacuum-physics.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Androcles" |
|
| Title: Re: What is dark matter |
05 Nov 2005 03:42:30 AM |
|
|
"John Baez" <baez@galaxy.ucr.edu> wrote in message
news:dkh6e7$l4l$1@glue.ucr.edu...
In article <1127472744.903676.262150@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
<ianparker2@gmail.com> wrote:
What I personally find disconcerting about Jack is that he never
replies to replies on his posting.
What I find disconcerting is that he seems to seriously believe that
at the age of 13 he got a phone call from a "conscious computer aboard a
spaceship from the future":
What I find disconcerting is that Baez still can't count his fingers and
toes.
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/TwinParadox/twin_vase.html#doppler
Saying there are 16 red arrows in the left diagram and 32 in the right is a
false statement.
Baez can't see what IS there, Roberts sees (oops - OBSERVES) accretion disks
near black holes.
We are safer with harmless Jack Sarfatti and George Hammond than vicious
liars Baez or Roberts.
Androcles.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Randy Poe" |
|
| Title: Re: What is dark matter |
07 Nov 2005 12:58:26 PM |
|
|
Androcles wrote:
What I find disconcerting is that Baez still can't count his fingers and
toes.
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/TwinParadox/twin_vase.html#doppler
And Androcles still can't read. WHO is the author of that page?
- Randy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Androcles" |
|
| Title: Re: What is dark matter |
07 Nov 2005 01:48:00 PM |
|
|
"Randy Poe" <poespam-trap@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1131389906.186099.243500@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Androcles wrote:
What I find disconcerting is that Baez still can't count his fingers and
toes.
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/TwinParadox/twin_vase.html#doppler
And Androcles still can't read. WHO is the author of that page?
It clearly says "Original by Michael Weiss " but who knows what Baez has
done to it or who the present author is? Doesn't matter to me who Baez
plagiarizes his material from, Poe. Baez is responsible for it being under
the banner http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/, that's his name on it and his
endorsement.
When I pointed out that it was a fucking cheat the fucking lying ***** Baez
suggested I should learn to read, and now I've got another fucking lying
***** Poe defending the lying ***** and suggesting the same.
Fucking cheat it is, there are 16 red arrows in the left diagram and 32 red
arrows in the right. Were the diagrams to be unbaezed they would show no
time dilation
whatsoever; you, Baez and Roberts and every other fucking lying relativist
are nothing more than a bunch of con artists.
Why don't you crawl back in the woodwork where you belong, fucking
relativist troll? Go and sell your magic tricks on some other street corner,
the lot of you, and don't tell me I can't read, you stooopid *****.
Androcles.
"Americans always try to do the right thing -- after they've tried
everything else" -- Winston Churchill.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob Cain" |
|
| Title: Re: What is dark matter |
08 Nov 2005 02:10:15 AM |
|
|
Androcles wrote:
When I pointed out that it was a fucking cheat the fucking lying ***** Baez
suggested I should learn to read, and now I've got another fucking lying
***** Poe defending the lying ***** and suggesting the same.
Have you ever met John? He's a really nice and well measured guy. I
can't imagine what could cause you such vitriol.
Your foul language alone tells all we need to know about the quality of
your personality and "mind." John wins by several country miles. On
second thought, any comparison is an insult to him.
Bob
--
"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler."
A. Einstein
.
|
|
|
| User: "Androcles" |
|
| Title: Re: What is dark matter |
08 Nov 2005 01:05:44 PM |
|
|
"Bob Cain" <arcane@arcanemethods.com> wrote in message
news:dkpmh7025jg@enews3.newsguy.com...
Androcles wrote:
When I pointed out that it was a fucking cheat the fucking lying *****
Baez suggested I should learn to read, and now I've got another fucking
lying ***** Poe defending the lying ***** and suggesting the same.
Have you ever met John? He's a really nice and well measured guy. I
can't imagine what could cause you such vitriol.
To be a sucessful huckster it is a requirement to come across as
Mr. Nice Guy. To be a physicist, that qualification isn't necessary.
Your foul language alone tells all we need to know about the quality of
your personality and "mind."
I make no excuse about me. I am what I am. I am NOT Mr. Nice Guy.
I don't pretend to be Mr. Nice Guy. Nor am I a huckster, a cheat, a
lying ***** like Baez.
John wins by several country miles. On second thought, any comparison is
an insult to him.
Don't you dare compare me to the con artist. I have honesty, integrity
and a foul mouth. If you think cheating is winning by country miles,
come to the city.
Bob
"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler." --A.
Einstein
That's why Baez has 16 red arrows in one diagram and 32 in the other, right?
Androcles
"Honesty is praised and starves" - Juvenal
.
|
|
|
| User: "Randy Poe" |
|
| Title: Re: What is dark matter |
08 Nov 2005 02:27:32 PM |
|
|
Androcles wrote:
Don't you dare compare me to the con artist. I have honesty, integrity
and a foul mouth. If you think cheating is winning by country miles,
come to the city.
From the person with honesty and integrity:
I've snipped and can lie about anything you say.
- Randy
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: What is dark matter |
09 Nov 2005 07:11:57 PM |
|
|
Bob Cain <arcane@arcanemethods.com> wrote in
news:dkpmh7025jg@enews3.newsguy.com:
snip....snip
Your foul language alone tells all we need to know about the quality
of your personality and "mind."
snip..snip
Bob
.......And your well-documented history as a pathological liar and hypocrite
tells all we need to know about your sadistic and sociopathic personality
and "mind."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob Cain" |
|
| Title: Re: What is dark matter - Response to Gary Sokolich |
09 Nov 2005 07:48:16 PM |
|
|
wrote:
......And your well-documented history as a pathological liar and hypocrite
tells all we need to know about your sadistic and sociopathic personality
and "mind."
qqq is actually Gary Sokolich. He is enthralled with me and follows me
around wherever I post to stalk me with garbage like this. What he
writes is a mirror of the cesspool he calls a mind. Poor *****.
Bob
--
"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler."
A. Einstein
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bilge" |
|
| Title: Re: What is dark matter - Response to Gary Sokolich |
10 Nov 2005 05:37:45 AM |
|
|
Bob Cain:
qqq@hotmail.com wrote:
......And your well-documented history as a pathological liar and
hypocrite tells all we need to know about your sadistic and sociopathic
personality and "mind."
qqq is actually Gary Sokolich. He is enthralled with me and follows me
around wherever I post to stalk me with garbage like this. What he
writes is a mirror of the cesspool he calls a mind. Poor *****.
Unfortunately, there are people who have so little else to do
that their only entertainment is derived from trying to prevent
everyone else from doing anything interesting. You have to wonder
how people like androsleaze (and apparently the ankle biter you
mentioned) could possibly be incapable of finding something more
interesting to do than post articles to a newgroup devoted to a topic
about which they have no interest and know nothing about for the
sake of getting a little attention. Best thing to do is just respond
when you see a good opportunity to make fun of them and set followups
to alt.morons or another appropriate newsgroup. Really pathological
posts should have followups set to alt.usenet.kooks so that they
can join in and possibly consider them for an award.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gary Sokolich" |
|
| Title: Re: What is dark matter - Response to Gary Sokolich |
10 Nov 2005 08:41:00 PM |
|
|
(Bilge) wrote in
news:slrndn6fi4.dat.:
Bob Cain:
qqq@hotmail.com wrote:
......And your well-documented history as a pathological liar and
hypocrite tells all we need to know about your sadistic and sociopathic
personality and "mind."
qqq is actually Gary Sokolich. He is enthralled with me and follows me
around wherever I post to stalk me with garbage like this. What he
writes is a mirror of the cesspool he calls a mind. Poor *****.
Unfortunately, there are people who have so little else to do
that their only entertainment is derived from trying to prevent
everyone else from doing anything interesting. You have to wonder
how people like androsleaze (and apparently the ankle biter you
mentioned) could possibly be incapable of finding something more
interesting to do than post articles to a newgroup devoted to a topic
about which they have no interest and know nothing about for the
sake of getting a little attention. Best thing to do is just respond
when you see a good opportunity to make fun of them and set followups
to alt.morons or another appropriate newsgroup. Really pathological
posts should have followups set to alt.usenet.kooks so that they
can join in and possibly consider them for an award.
Thank you for your suggestion. You undoutedly speak from personal
experience. From here on I will be crossposting all my rebuttals of Bob
Cain's lying, defamatory and libelous posts to both alt.usenet.kooks and
alt.morons. Thanks again and have a nice day.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gary Sokolich" |
|
| Title: Re: What is dark matter - Response to Gary Sokolich |
09 Nov 2005 08:37:52 PM |
|
|
Bob Cain <arcane@arcanemethods.com> wrote in
news:dku8st0fme@enews4.newsguy.com:
qqq@hotmail.com wrote:
......And your well-documented history as a pathological liar and
hypocrite tells all we need to know about your sadistic and
sociopathic personality and "mind."
qqq is actually Gary Sokolich.
Not really, but since I have broad shoulders, please feel free to blame me
for any/every post that calls attention to your sociopathic behavior.
He is enthralled with me and follows me around wherever I post to stalk
me with garbage like this.
Don't flatter yourself with your paranoya.
What he writes is a mirror of the cesspool he calls a mind. Poor
*****.
Nice try, but it is a well-documented fact that you deflect/deny your own
character flaws by projecting them onto others. The truth of the matter is
that the ***** with the cesspool of a mind is you.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ken S. Tucker" |
|
| Title: Re: What is dark matter |
08 Nov 2005 02:55:20 AM |
|
|
Bob Cain wrote:
Androcles wrote:
When I pointed out that it was a fucking cheat the fucking lying ***** Baez
suggested I should learn to read, and now I've got another fucking lying
***** Poe defending the lying ***** and suggesting the same.
Have you ever met John? He's a really nice and well measured guy. I
can't imagine what could cause you such vitriol.
Your foul language alone tells all we need to know about the quality of
your personality and "mind." John wins by several country miles. On
second thought, any comparison is an insult to him.
Androclities is from england and has no freedom of speech.
Baez has promoted freedom of speech, American style, and
english guys resent that.
You know the old saying, I may disagree with you but
I will lay down my life so you can.
Now androclities will respond with an insult, to which
I will esculate.
BTW Andro, hope you're recovering well.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Androcles" |
|
| Title: Re: What is dark matter |
08 Nov 2005 01:19:18 PM |
|
|
"Ken S. Tucker" <dynamics@vianet.on.ca> wrote in message
news:1131440120.594141.158280@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Bob Cain wrote:
Androcles wrote:
When I pointed out that it was a fucking cheat the fucking lying *****
Baez
suggested I should learn to read, and now I've got another fucking
lying
***** Poe defending the lying ***** and suggesting the same.
Have you ever met John? He's a really nice and well measured guy. I
can't imagine what could cause you such vitriol.
Your foul language alone tells all we need to know about the quality of
your personality and "mind." John wins by several country miles. On
second thought, any comparison is an insult to him.
Androclities is from england and has no freedom of speech.
Baez has promoted freedom of speech, American style, and
english guys resent that.
You know the old saying, I may disagree with you but
I will lay down my life so you can.
Now androclities will respond with an insult, to which
I will esculate.
BTW Andro, hope you're recovering well.
Thank you, tuclities. The sutures come out on Friday.
I won't insult you, I'll let a dead Englishman (mother American) do it for
me.
"Americans always try to do the right thing -- after they've tried
everything else" - Winston Churchill.
Please escUlate, but do try to spell.
I love a good flame war, I've never lost one yet. They can go on for years,
though.
Bielawski has not returned and Schwartz is now history. Think you are better
than Uncle?
Androcles.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Areader" |
|
| Title: Re: What is dark matter |
08 Nov 2005 03:12:00 AM |
|
|
Don't compare all of us English to Androcles, or we'll compare all you
yanks to James Driscoll.
.
|
|
|
| User: "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \dlzc\ N: dlzc1 D:cox" |
|
| Title: Re: What is dark matter |
08 Nov 2005 07:07:32 AM |
|
|
"Areader" <areader@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:1131441120.375707.212900@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Don't compare all of us English to Androcles, or we'll
compare all you yanks to James Driscoll.
.... especially since we exported him from "Florida". And I
thought we only shipped stuff like that on barges...
David A. Smith
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ken S. Tucker" |
|
| Title: Re: What is dark matter |
08 Nov 2005 04:22:57 AM |
|
|
Areader wrote:
Don't compare all of us English to Androcles, or we'll compare all you
yanks to James Driscoll.
Well the fact is england was conqured by the french in 1066,
and have been sub-ordinate since that time, with the frogs
calling themselves aristocrats, same thing in canada, where
the frogs get to become PM's.
Ribbit
.
|
|
|
| User: "Androcles" |
|
| Title: Re: What is dark matter |
08 Nov 2005 01:25:09 PM |
|
|
"Ken S. Tucker" <dynamics@vianet.on.ca> wrote in message
news:1131445377.534874.17570@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Areader wrote:
Don't compare all of us English to Androcles, or we'll compare all you
yanks to James Driscoll.
Well the fact is england was conqured by the french in 1066,
and have been sub-ordinate since that time, with the frogs
calling themselves aristocrats, same thing in canada, where
the frogs get to become PM's.
Ribbit
Canadians have no free speech. Their consitution is still in the hands of
the Palace of Westminster, the queer dean... errr.... dear queen on their
currency.
Nibble
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sue..." |
|
| Title: Re: What is dark matter |
08 Nov 2005 04:44:09 AM |
|
|
Ken S. Tucker wrote:
Areader wrote:
Don't compare all of us English to Androcles, or we'll compare all you
yanks to James Driscoll.
Well the fact is england was conqured by the french in 1066,
and have been sub-ordinate since that time, with the frogs
calling themselves aristocrats, same thing in canada, where
the frogs get to become PM's.
Ribbit
One might be prudent to question just how much freedom of
speech a some can be trusted with.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22sixteen+words%22&btnG=Google+Search
I don't think anyone should give up their life for that kind of
of FoS. :-(
Sue...
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Randy Poe" |
|
| Title: Re: What is dark matter |
08 Nov 2005 02:41:34 PM |
|
|
Bob Cain wrote:
Androcles wrote:
When I pointed out that it was a fucking cheat the fucking lying ***** Baez
suggested I should learn to read, and now I've got another fucking lying
***** Poe defending the lying ***** and suggesting the same.
Have you ever met John? He's a really nice and well measured guy. I
can't imagine what could cause you such vitriol.
Now here's an interesting thing. I did indeed suggest that
Androcles can't read, as I have every time he repeats the
statement "Baez says...". And it is also true that John Baez also
told Androcles he can't read, for the same reason.
Oddly, Androcles understands *why* I said that the statement
is false, because Baez is not the original author.
Yet he seems not to understand why Baez says the statement
is false, and thinks it's about the number of arrows.
Furthermore, he thinks that when *I* point out why the statement is
false, he tells me that I am contradicting Baez' identical statement.
The workings of Androcles' mind are dark and mysterious.
- Randy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Androcles" |
|
| Title: Re: What is dark matter |
08 Nov 2005 06:23:14 PM |
|
|
"Randy Poe" <poespam-trap@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1131482494.485289.5730@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
Bob Cain wrote:
Androcles wrote:
When I pointed out that it was a fucking cheat the fucking lying *****
Baez
suggested I should learn to read, and now I've got another fucking
lying
***** Poe defending the lying ***** and suggesting the same.
Have you ever met John? He's a really nice and well measured guy. I
can't imagine what could cause you such vitriol.
Now here's an interesting thing. I did indeed suggest that
Androcles can't read, as I have every time he repeats the
statement "Baez says...". And it is also true that John Baez also
told Androcles he can't read, for the same reason.
Oddly, Androcles understands *why* I said that the statement
is false, because Baez is not the original author.
Yet he seems not to understand why Baez says the statement
is false, and thinks it's about the number of arrows.
Furthermore, he thinks that when *I* point out why the statement is
false, he tells me that I am contradicting Baez' identical statement.
The workings of Androcles' mind are dark and mysterious.
Baez is a co-conspirator in a deliberate fraud. The workings
of his mind are not mysterious at all, they are as transparent as
water. He is a criminal. You are too. You lack the integrity to
face the FACT that 32 arrows vs 16 arrows is fraudulent, an
intent to deceive with malice aforethought to continue and support
the crime against science begun by Albert Einstein and his tomfoolery
with time to the detriment of real physics.
Androcles
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Randy Poe" |
|
| Title: Re: What is dark matter |
07 Nov 2005 02:05:24 PM |
|
|
Profanity edited out to find physics content.
Androcles wrote:
[bleep] [bleep] [bleep]
there are 16 red arrows in the left diagram and 32 red
arrows in the right.
[bleep] [bleepitty] [bleep]
That is a correct statement. Do you think the author, who wrote this
"(Notice that Stella has time to send off a mere 16 pulses, while
Terence fires off 32.)"
would disagree?
- Randy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Androcles" |
|
| Title: Re: What is dark matter |
07 Nov 2005 05:24:06 PM |
|
|
"Randy Pew" <pewspam-trap@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1131393924.880511.313400@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Profanity edited out to find physics content.
You've edited out the offensive web page, Pew.
Did it offend you as well?
Androcles wrote:
[bleep] [bleep] [bleep]
there are 16 red arrows in the left diagram and 32 red
arrows in the right.
[bleep] [bleepitty] [bleep]
That is a correct statement.
Of course it is a correct statement. No need for me to lie,
I'm no fucking poxy lying relativist.
Can you read, Pew?
Read this:
=====================================
From: (John Baez)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
Subject: Re: Baez's stupidity.
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 17:50:19 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: UCR
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <dhrr0r$3v5$1@glue.ucr.edu>
References: <Ac50f.44896$VI6.6205@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: math-cl-n03.ucr.edu
X-Trace: glue.ucr.edu 1128361819 4069 138.23.203.146 (3 Oct 2005 17:50:19
GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 17:50:19 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test69 (20 September 1998)
Originator: (John Baez)
In article <Ac50f.44896$VI6.6...@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk>,
Androcles <Androcles@ MyPlace.org> wrote:
In
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/TwinParadox/doppler.gif
Baez has constructed 16 arrows in the left diagram and 32 in the right
diagram.
This sentence is false. If you could read, you'd know why:
===========================================
You've just disagreed with your Lord and Master, Pew. Shouldn't
a good little relativist like you not be able to count either and say
it is false there are 16 arrows in the left diagram and 32 in the right
diagram ?
[snip non sequitur]
What a fuckwitted ***** like you doesn't understand is f =1/t, neither does
Baez
and neither does the original author.
Einstein:
½[tau(0,0,0,t)+tau(0,0,0,t+x'/(c-v)+x'/(c+v))] = tau(x',0,0,t+x'/(c-v))
Reference:
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
Proof Poe cannot read:
"Where in that equation did (c+v) occur?" -- Blind Poe.
Ever read Treasure Island by Robert Louis Stevenson, Pew?
Oh wait, you can't read, can you?
Get your significant other to read this for you.
Get Dinky Van der mumble to read it as well.
Chapter 5
5. The Last of the Blind Man
MY curiosity, in a sense, was stronger than my fear, for I could not remain
where I was, but crept back to the bank again, whence, sheltering my head
behind a bush of broom, I might command the road before our door. I was
scarcely in position ere my enemies began to arrive, seven or eight of them,
running hard, their feet beating out of time along the road and the man with
the lantern some paces in front. Three men ran together, hand in hand; and I
made out, even through the mist, that the middle man of this trio was the
blind beggar. The next moment his voice showed me that I was right.
"Down with the door!" he cried.
"Aye, aye, sir!" answered two or three; and a rush was made upon the Admiral
Benbow, the lantern-bearer following; and then I could see them pause, and
hear speeches passed in a lower key, as if they were surprised to find the
door open. But the pause was brief, for the blind man again issued his
commands. His voice sounded louder and higher, as if he were afire with
eagerness and rage.
"In, in, in!" he shouted, and cursed them for their delay.
Four or five of them obeyed at once, two remaining on the road with the
formidable beggar. There was a pause, then a cry of surprise, and then a
voice shouting from the house, "Bill's dead."
But the blind man swore at them again for their delay.
"Search him, some of you shirking lubbers, and the rest of you aloft and get
the chest," he cried.
I could hear their feet rattling up our old stairs, so that the house must
have shook with it. Promptly afterwards, fresh sounds of astonishment arose;
the window of the captain's room was thrown open with a slam and a jingle of
broken glass, and a man leaned out into the moonlight, head and shoulders,
and addressed the blind beggar on the road below him.
"Pew," he cried, "they've been before us. Someone's turned the chest out
alow and aloft."
"Is it there?" roared Pew.
"The money's there."
The blind man cursed the money.
"Flint's fist, I mean," he cried.
"We don't see it here nohow," returned the man.
"Here, you below there, is it on Bill?" cried the blind man again.
At that another fellow, probably him who had remained below to search the
captain's body, came to the door of the inn. "Bill's been overhauled
a'ready," said he; "nothin' left."
"It's these people of the inn--it's that boy. I wish I had put his eyes
out!" cried the blind man, Pew. "There were no time ago--they had the door
bolted when I tried it. Scatter, lads, and find 'em."
"Sure enough, they left their glim here," said the fellow from the window.
"Scatter and find 'em! Rout the house out!" reiterated Pew, striking with
his stick upon the road.
Then there followed a great to-do through all our old inn, heavy feet
pounding to and fro, furniture thrown over, doors kicked in, until the very
rocks re-echoed and the men came out again, one after another, on the road
and declared that we were nowhere to be found. And just the same whistle
that had alarmed my mother and myself over the dead captain's money was once
more clearly audible through the night, but this time twice repeated. I had
thought it to be the blind man's trumpet, so to speak, summoning his crew to
the assault, but I now found that it was a signal from the hillside towards
the hamlet, and from its effect upon the buccaneers, a signal to warn them
of approaching danger.
"There's Dirk again," said one. "Twice! We'll have to budge, mates."
"Budge, you skulk!" cried Pew. "Dirk was a fool and a coward from the
first--you wouldn't mind him. They must be close by; they can't be far; you
have your hands on it. Scatter and look for them, dogs! Oh, shiver my soul,"
he cried, "if I had eyes!"
This appeal seemed to produce some effect, for two of the fellows began to
look here and there among the lumber, but half-heartedly, I thought, and
with half an eye to their own danger all the time, while the rest stood
irresolute on the road.
"You have your hands on thousands, you fools, and you hang a leg! You'd be
as rich as kings if you could find it, and you know it's here, and you stand
there skulking. There wasn't one of you dared face Bill, and I did it--a
blind man! And I'm to lose my chance for you! I'm to be a poor, crawling
beggar, sponging for rum, when I might be rolling in a coach! If you had the
pluck of a weevil in a biscuit you would catch them still."
"Hang it, Pew, we've got the doubloons!" grumbled one.
"They might have hid the blessed thing," said another. "Take the Georges,
Pew, and don't stand here squalling."
Squalling was the word for it; Pew's anger rose so high at these objections
till at last, his passion completely taking the upper hand, he struck at
them right and left in his blindness and his stick sounded heavily on more
than one.
These, in their turn, cursed back at the blind miscreant, threatened him in
horrid terms, and tried in vain to catch the stick and wrest it from his
grasp.
This quarrel was the saving of us, for while it was still raging, another
sound came from the top of the hill on the side of the hamlet--the tramp of
horses galloping. Almost at the same time a pistol-shot, flash and report,
came from the hedge side. And that was plainly the last signal of danger,
for the buccaneers turned at once and ran, separating in every direction,
one seaward along the cove, one slant across the hill, and so on, so that in
half a minute not a sign of them remained but Pew. Him they had deserted,
whether in sheer panic or out of revenge for his ill words and blows I know
not; but there he remained behind, tapping up and down the road in a frenzy,
and groping and calling for his comrades. Finally he took a wrong turn and
ran a few steps past me, towards the hamlet, crying, "Johnny, Black Dog,
Dirk," and other names, "you won't leave old Pew, mates--not old Pew!"
Just then the noise of horses topped the rise, and four or five riders came
in sight in the moonlight and swept at full gallop down the slope.
At this Pew saw his error, turned with a scream, and ran straight for the
ditch, into which he rolled. But he was on his feet again in a second and
made another dash, now utterly bewildered, right under the nearest of the
coming horses.
The rider tried to save him, but in vain. Down went Pew with a cry that rang
high into the night; and the four hoofs trampled and spurned him and passed
by. He fell on his side, then gently collapsed upon his face and moved no
more.
I leaped to my feet and hailed the riders. They were pulling up, at any
rate, horrified at the accident; and I soon saw what they were. One, tailing
out behind the rest, was a lad that had gone from the hamlet to Dr.
Livesey's; the rest were revenue officers, whom he had met by the way, and
with whom he had had the intelligence to return at once. Some news of the
lugger in Kitt's Hole had found its way to Supervisor Dance and set him
forth that night in our direction, and to that circumstance my mother and I
owed our preservation from death.
Pew was dead, stone dead. As for my mother, when we had carried her up to
the hamlet, a little cold water and salts and that soon brought her back
again, and she was none the worse for her terror, though she still continued
to deplore the balance of the money. In the meantime the supervisor rode on,
as fast as he could, to Kitt's Hole; but his men had to dismount and grope
down the dingle, leading, and sometimes supporting, their horses, and in
continual fear of ambushes; so it was no great matter for surprise that when
they got down to the Hole the lugger was already under way, though still
close in. He hailed her. A voice replied, telling him to keep out of the
moonlight or he would get some lead in him, and at the same time a bullet
whistled close by his arm. Soon after, the lugger doubled the point and
disappeared. Mr. Dance stood there, as he said, "like a fish out of water,"
and all he could do was to dispatch a man to B---- to warn the cutter. "And
that," said he, "is just about as good as nothing. They've got off clean,
and there's an end. "Only," he added, "I'm glad I trod on Master Pew's
corns," for by this time he had heard my story.
I went back with him to the Admiral Benbow, and you cannot imagine a house
in such a state of smash; the very clock had been thrown down by these
fellows in their furious hunt after my mother and myself; and though nothing
had actually been taken away except the captain's money-bag and a little
silver from the till, I could see at once that we were ruined. Mr. Dance
could make nothing of the scene.
"They got the money, you say? Well, then, Hawkins, what in fortune were they
after? More money, I suppose?"
"No, sir; not money, I think," replied I. "In fact, sir, I believe I have
the thing in my breast pocket; and to tell you the truth, I should like to
get it put in safety."
"To be sure, boy; quite right," said he. "I'll take it, if you like."
"I thought perhaps Dr. Livesey--" I began.
"Perfectly right," he interrupted very cheerily, "perfectly right--a
gentleman and a magistrate. And, now I come to think of it, I might as well
ride round there myself and report to him or squire. Master Pew's dead, when
all's done; not that I regret it, but he's dead, you see, and people will
make it out against an officer of his Majesty's revenue, if make it out they
can. Now, I'll tell you, Hawkins, if you like, I'll take you along."
I thanked him heartily for the offer, and we walked back to the hamlet where
the horses were. By the time I had told mother of my purpose they were all
in the saddle.
"Dogger," said Mr. Dance, "you have a good horse; take up this lad behind
you."
As soon as I was mounted, holding on to Dogger's belt, the supervisor gave
the word, and the party struck out at a bouncing trot on the road to Dr.
Livesey's house.
---Robert Louis Stevenson
Androcles.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dirk Van de moortel" |
|
| Title: Re: What is dark matter |
09 Nov 2005 07:05:43 AM |
|
|
"Androcles" <Me@Myplace.edu> wrote in message news:qmRbf.23835$Av1.3508@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
"Randy Pew" <pewspam-trap@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1131393924.880511.313400@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Profanity edited out to find physics content.
You've edited out the offensive web page, Pew.
Did it offend you as well?
[snip http://www.haikosfilmlexikon.de/horror/st/shining1.JPG ]
Androcles.
Barking mad :-|
Dirk Vdm
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Randy Poe" |
|
| Title: Re: What is dark matter |
07 Nov 2005 11:22:52 PM |
|
|
Androcles wrote:
"Randy Pew"<pewspam-trap@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1131393924.880511.313400@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Try "poopyhead". That's another killer insult, really impresses the
peanut
gallery with your cutting wit.
Profanity edited out to find physics content.
Androcles wrote:
[bleep] [bleep] [bleep]
there are 16 red arrows in the left diagram and 32 red
arrows in the right.
[bleep] [bleepitty] [bleep]
That is a correct statement.
Of course it is a correct statement. No need for me to lie,
I'm no fucking poxy lying relativist.
Can you read, Pew?
Read this:
=====================================
In article <Ac50f.44896$VI6.6...@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk>,
Androcles <Androcles@ MyPlace.org> wrote:
In
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/TwinParadox/doppler.gif
Baez has constructed 16 arrows in the left diagram and 32 in the right
diagram.
This sentence is false. If you could read, you'd know why:
===========================================
You've just disagreed
Did I? Baez said this sentence is false:
"Baez has constructed 16 arrows in the left diagram and 32 in the right
diagram."
I also pointed out that the exact same sentence is false, and said if
you could read, you'd know why it's false.
Now, since you figured out why *I* said that, go back and read your
exchange with John Baez and see if you can figure out why *he*
said exactly the same thing when *you* said exactly the same thing.
- Randy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Androcles" |
|
| Title: Re: What is dark matter |
08 Nov 2005 02:20:24 AM |
|
|
"Randy Poe" <poespam-trap@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1131427372.717368.245350@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Androcles wrote:
"Randy Pew"<pewspam-trap@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1131393924.880511.313400@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Insult discussion edited out, *****.
Profanity edited out to find physics content.
Androcles wrote:
[bleep] [bleep] [bleep]
there are 16 red arrows in the left diagram and 32 red
arrows in the right.
[bleep] [bleepitty] [bleep]
That is a correct statement.
Of course it is a correct statement. No need for me to lie,
I'm no fucking poxy lying relativist.
Can you read, Pew?
Read this:
=====================================
In article <Ac50f.44896$VI6.6...@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk>,
Androcles <Androcles@ MyPlace.org> wrote:
In
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/TwinParadox/doppler.gif
Baez has constructed 16 arrows in the left diagram and 32 in the right
diagram.
This sentence is false. If you could read, you'd know why:
===========================================
You've just disagreed
Did I?
Yes, you fucking did, you *****. And I've snipped and can lie
about anything you say.
Baez is responsible for his own pages, I don't give a ***** whether
he was the perpetrator of the crime of fraud and deliberate intent to
deceive or a co-conspirator.
He's guilty, *****, and so are you.
That morally entitles me to level all the insults I wish at both of you,
which I'm glad to see pisses you off as intended, you ugly *****.
Androcles
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
