| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Jack Sarfatti" |
| Date: |
10 Apr 2007 12:48:38 AM |
| Object: |
What is the Universe made from? |
Of course the model below is only a toy model illustrating a set ideas
organized in an unfamiliar way in an attempt to shed some light on the
greatest mystery in physics today
What is our universe mostly made of?
Jack Sarfatti <sarfatti@pacbell.net> wrote:
Decoding The Cipher of Genesis
Looking at elementary cavity quantum field theory for a scalar field
U(x,t) in 1+1 spacetime, e.g. string standing wave oscillations, the
mass shell condition f = (signal speed)k for zero dispersion and zero
rest mass is enforced by boundary conditions e.g. U(0,t) = U(L,t) so that
f(l) = l(signal speed)/2L
where l is the mode index that in this simple case is an integer 1 to
infinity.
group speed = signal speed = phase speed
in this non-dispersive toy model.
The resulting Fock occupation number states |n> are n identical real on
shell quanta each of frequency f(l) in the lth mode of wave length 2L/l
with l = 1 the fundamental, l =2 the first harmonic and so on. The Fock
space vacuum of a given mode with n = 0 has an effective random noise
occupation number of 1/2.
In contrast to Fock states that are orthogonal inside a single mode (the
modes are, in addition, mutually orthogonal)
<n|n'> = 0 when n =/= n'
The macroquantum ODLRO coherent Glauber states |z> are coherent
superpositions of different numbers of "real" quanta they are not
orthogonal for a given l mode, i.e.
<z|z'> =/= 0 ODLRO states when z =/= z'
z is a complex number
z = <n>^1/2e^itheta
theta is the coherent phase
<n> is the mean occupation number
Uncertainty principle
delta(n)delta(theta) > 1/2
z is a displaced Gaussian in the complex z-plane
|z> = e^(z*a - za*)|0>
|0> is the Fock space vacuum for the single lth standing wave mode of
the 1D cavity.
aa* - a*a = 1
a|0> = 0
<0|a* = 0
The single mode Hamiltonian is global over the entire cavity space
H(l) = hf(l)[a*(l)a(l) + 1/2]
I will drop the l for simplicity, understood only a single standing wave
mode of sharp wavelength and a definite frequency.
<0|H|0> = hf/2
is the random zero point energy ZPE of that single mode.
This zero point energy in the Fock vacuum |0> directly antigravitates
repulsively like an isotropic fluid with w = - 1 in the 3D case - not
the present 1D model.
You can think of microquantum |0> as a toy model for the unstable false
pre-inflation random incoherent vacuum whose collapse to a more stable
less random more coherent macroquantum Glauber state ODLRO "superfluid"
vacuum |z>.
OK so here is how to do the ODLRO "superfluid" for this single mode.
a = A + @
A is the ODLRO c-number condensate
@ are the random zero point quanta in the coherent vacuum at absolute
zero temperature where there are no on-shell elementary excitations
"normal fluid" excited states above this Higgs field vacuum where theta
is a Goldstone phase.
H(ODLRO) = hf(A* + @*)(A + @) + hf/2
The Glauber states |z> are defined relative to the @ and @* second
quantized single-mode destruction and creation operators NOT the
original a & a*.
a & a* are the pre-inflation false unstable vacuum operators
@ & @* are the post-inflation dark energy-dark matter metastable vacuum
ZPE operators at absolute zero temperature prior to the hot big bang
creating ordinary matter and radiation that is only 4% of all the stuff
of our accelerating expanding pocket universe in the cosmic landscape of
the megaverse of parallel universes including the parallel Virgin
Earth's that are part of our Manifest Destiny Matrix - the space
migration now professed by Stephen Hawking.
The energy of our false incoherent Fock vacuum without any ODLRO
macroquantum condensate is
<0|H|0> = <0|(hf + 1/2)a*a|0> = hf/2
The energy of our more stable coherent vacuum condensate is
<z|H(ODLRO)|z> = hf(|A|^2 + A*z + Az* + |z|^2 + 1/2)
Note if |A| = 0 i.e. no ODLRO
<z|H|z> = (<n> + 1/2)hf > <0|H|0>
The energy difference of the vacuum phase transition in this single-mode
1D toy model is
<z|H(ODLRO)|z> - <0|H|0> = hf(|A|^2 + A*z + Az* + |z|^2) < 0 stability
|A|^2 = vacuum condensate density
is it real or virtual quanta? (Larry Krauss in "Quintessence")
What does that distinction even mean here?
I opt for virtual since we are at absolute zero.
In superfluid helium at absolute zero the condensate density is 10%, the
zero point density is 90% and the total superfluid density is the sum
100% with zero % normal fluid real particles at finite temperature - in
thermal equilibrium approximation of course.
|z|^2 = zero point dark energy/matter density
The cross terms are the flow of virtual random quanta into and out of
the coherent vacuum condensate reservoir out of which the curved fabric
of spacetime emerges as I showed elsewhere.
The energy density per mode released in this first order vacuum phase
transition making the hot Big Bang that creates the 4% ordinary matter
and radiation we are made out of is determined by the coherent Goldstone
phase lag constraint
Vacuum Condensate Density + Dark Energy ZPF Density
+ 2(Vacuum Condensate Density)(Dark Energy ZPF
Density)^1/2cos(Goldstone Phase Lag) < 0
Phase lag is between the vacuum condensate phase and the ZPE dark energy
phase in this 3 fluid (not 2-fluid macroquantum cosmology toy model with
advanced signal retrocausality - discussed elsewhere (pun intended).
These quantum energy densities can go negative.
Either the vacuum condensate energy density or the ZPF energy density
can be negative.
Let their ratio be x. The stability inequality is
x + 1/x < 1
therefore x < 0.
positive ZPF energy density is repulsive dark energy
negative ZPF energy density is attractive dark matter
of course the model below is only a toy model illustrating a set ideas
organized in an unfamiliar way in an attempt to shed some light on the
greatest mystery in physics today
What is our universe mostly made of?
Jack Sarfatti <sarfatti@pacbell.net> wrote:
Sidney Coleman's 1973 Erice Lectures on Hidden Secret Symmetries i.e.
spontaneous broken symmetry of ground state comes closest. But Kraus's
formulation of the problem may be spurious.
If we have a generally locally variable Higgs field of n real components
Psi(x,t) its Fourier integral (assume globally flat spacetime for now)
will have components for all frequencies and all wave vectors - hence a
mass shell condition makes no sense.
Colement defines the vacuum condensate for a renormalizable quartic
(Mexican Hat) spin 0 scalar quantum field in terms of the connected
generating functional W(J) where
e^iW(J) = <0+|0->
vacuum to vacuum Feynman amplitude
The classical ODLRO vacuum condensate field Psi(x,t) is the functional
derivative of W with respect to external source current density J(x)
The effective action is a functional Legendre transform of the
generating functional by the global integral of J(x) multiplies by the
ODLRO condensate field.
The effective action is also a Taylor series expansion of all nth order
IPI Green's functions of the scalar field with nth order product of the
ODLRO order parameters. Now I think those IPI Greens functions are all
virtual quanta exchanges because "no propagators on the external lines"
but I am not sure.
One then gets an effective potential V of the ODLRO vacuum condensate
order parameter.
This only scratches the surface of course. Not a solution.
Jack Sarfatti <sarfatti@pacbell.net> wrote:
The problem is not trivial. Appeal to BCS Green's function not good
because the condensate there, and in superfluid helium, is on shell real
particles in a ground state.
In the case of the actual Higgs field of our universe from inflation out
of which curved spacetime emerges, i.e. the tetrad and spin connection
1-forms from the Goldstone phases of the ODLRO coherent vacuum - the
issue is are there pole contributions to the vacuum in the Green's
functions for elementary excitations of the coherent vacuum, or are the
pole terms only in the elementary excitations of the pre-inflation false
vacuum prior to the Cosmic Trigger advanced signal from the future
deSitter horizon of the emergent pocket universe on the Landscape? The
advanced signal lowers the entropy of the early universe explaining how
the Arrow of Time of the Second Law of Thermo is "parallel" to the now
accelerating expansion of 3D space.
Larry Krauss writes in his book "Quintessence":
"phase transitions in the 'vacuum' (or ground state) of nature can
occur. In such cases a finite density of real particles might 'condense'
into the new vacuum state." p. 41
If the macro-quantum ODLRO part(s) is from a pole(s) in the appropriate
Green's function(s) then Kraus is correct, i.e. if there is a mass shell
constraint p^upu = m^2 for the quanta inside the effective BEC(s). There
is no microscopic theory of the inflation Higgs field(s) as yet.
For example, in the Glauber state |z> of quantum optics where
a|z> = z|z>
z = <n>^1/2e^i(coherent phase)
f = ck for transverse radiation real photons on mass shell (here mass
shell = light cone)
is true physically.
However if one uses a wavelet mode basis this need not be true at all.
A finite spatial wave packet has many k for same frequency f like a
virtual photon. This is physically important in a cavity. Of course,
such a wavepacket may also have a frequency spread where f = ck.
In the quantum oscillator problem one only uses f and then ad-hoc
imposes f = ck in the case of far field transverse photons. However, one
can imagine coherent states of virtual photons off mass shell including
longitudinal polarization in which a given f has all possible k.
That is, the second-quantized operators a & a* where aa* - a*a = 1 do
not refer to plane waves in infinite space but are wave packets inside a
cavity.
Note also that the classical static Coulomb potential
V = +- e^2/r
consists of virtual longitudinal photons in a macroquantum coherent f =
0 (DC) state with all possible k momenta i.e.
Vk ~ e^2/k^2
1/k^2 is the almost photon propagator Green's function i.e.
e (1/k^2)e
is essentially a Feynman diagram with charges e at each vertex (dot) and
a wiggley virtual photon line connecting the two dots.
To add advanced and retarded boundary conditions
1/(k^2 +- iepsilon)
Jack Sarfatti <sarfatti@pacbell.net> wrote:
Larry Krauss in his 2000 book "Quintessence" says the vacuum condensate
is a large number of Bose-Einstein condensed real on shell particles in
the same single-particle state. I picture them as virtual off-shell. Who
is correct? Must look at Gorkov theory of BCS Green's functions with
ODLRO to see what is what here. Real particles are poles in complex
energy plane of Green's functions. Pole + off pole parts at T = 0 is
100% L-G superfluid density. Off pole part = locally incoherent
nonlocally coherent EPR entangled ZPF if pole part is the ODLRO
condensate. I am checking into this.
.
|
|
| User: "Bob Kolker" |
|
| Title: Re: What is the Universe made from? |
10 Apr 2007 09:30:08 AM |
|
|
Jack Sarfatti wrote:
Of course the model below is only a toy model illustrating a set ideas
organized in an unfamiliar way in an attempt to shed some light on the
greatest mystery in physics today
What is our universe mostly made of?
And excercise in futility. If you say the Universe is made of X, then
ask what X is made of. If you say X is made of Y, then ask what is Y
made of. Usw ad infinitum.
In short you are pissing up a rope.
Bob Kolker
.
|
|
|
| User: "Traveler" |
|
| Title: Re: What is the Universe made from? |
10 Apr 2007 09:40:59 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 10:30:08 -0400, Bob Kolker <nowhere@nowhere.com>
wrote:
Jack Sarfatti wrote:
Of course the model below is only a toy model illustrating a set ideas
organized in an unfamiliar way in an attempt to shed some light on the
greatest mystery in physics today
What is our universe mostly made of?
And excercise in futility. If you say the Universe is made of X, then
ask what X is made of. If you say X is made of Y, then ask what is Y
made of. Usw ad infinitum.
In short you are pissing up a rope.
My thoughts, exactly. The only alternative that does not lead to an
infinite regress is that the universe is made of nothing.
Nasty Little Truth About Matter:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Crackpots/nasty.htm#Matter
Louis Savain
.
|
|
|
| User: "G=EMC^2 Glazier" |
|
| Title: Re: What is the Universe made from? |
11 Apr 2007 03:37:36 PM |
|
|
All there is Bert
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dr. V I Plankenstein" |
|
| Title: Re: What is the Universe made from? |
10 Apr 2007 06:42:15 AM |
|
|
Q > What is our universe mostly made of?
A Dimension, and nothing else. Alll particles and waves are just
discrete or continuous waveforms in this medium of wave propagation,
otherwise known as Length and Time.
C'mon Jack - did you really need "me" to tell you that ? Afterall - I'm
not even a real physicist. I'm a plumber.
But, I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night -
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Autymn D. C." |
|
| Title: Re: What is the Universe made from? |
13 Apr 2007 01:35:28 PM |
|
|
This chaff doesn't sound like the stuff at http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Preon.
Jack should learn what - and , are for.
What is the univers maed from? There is no nothing, no nouht, and no
none. You, Al, Baez, and a host of other scientists-dumbasses can't
tell between a vectoral sign and a scaloral sign. The negative =E8n=E8rjy
solutions to Dirac and Newton's fields are sheerly vectoral, not that
they couldn't be of the other kind. And so are the background's
expectation, where the delta works the same as the 1-vector.
The univers is auht: http://dictionary.com/browse/aught. My name
happens benun its shortening, so ye must worship me as yeir onely god,
this motherland's new jahwhh.
-Aut
http://google.com/groups?q=3DAutymn+New-Model
in ambiplasma
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
