Science > Physics > WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 5 Aug 05 Washington, DC
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Sam Wormley" |
| Date: |
05 Aug 2005 03:17:10 PM |
| Object: |
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 5 Aug 05 Washington, DC |
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 5 Aug 05 Washington, DC
science n. the intellectual and practical activity encompassing
the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the
physical and natural world through observation and
experiment. (Oxford English Dictionary, eleventh edition)
1. THE PRESIDENT: MAYBE THE WHITE HOUSE COULD USE A DICTIONARY.
Conservative Christian supporters are gloating. On Tuesday, in
an interview with Texas reporters, the President of the United
States came down on the side of equal time for intelligent
design. Referring back to his time as Governor of Texas, Mr.
Bush said, "I felt like both sides ought to be properly taught."
Which two sides are those Mr. President? I don't think we can
teach the Genesis story in science class, even after you pack the
Court. Surely you're not talking about the "intelligent design"
thing? Can someone tell us who or what is doing the designing?
I think that will tell us whether it's science or religion.
2. THE FOUNDER: DISCOVERY INSTITUTE DOESN'T NEED A DICTIONARY.
The Washington Post on Saturday had a little-noticed letter from
Bruce Chapman, founder and President of the Discovery Institute.
Director of the White House Office of Planning and Evaluation
under Ronald Reagan, Chapman learned from the master. Facts are
not important, what matters is conviction. "The only religious
believers in all this," he writes, "are the Darwinists, who are
out to punish scholars who see the weakness of Darwin's theory."
And who are these scholars? This brings up another alarming
trend, conservative think tanks manned by "scholars" who do no
research, but spew out books laden with conviction. Chapman
perfected this by recruiting bright young believers to the cause
and assigning them the task of becoming biology PhDs.
3. THE SCIENCE ADVISOR: THE PRESIDENT HAS A SCIENCE ADVISOR?
Asked by the New York Times to comment, John Marburger responded,
"Evolution is the cornerstone of modern biology .... intelligent
design is not a scientific concept." Good response. It would be
nice if the President's science advisor advised the President.
4. THE VATICAN ASTRONOMER: CATHOLIC CHURCH SPLITS OVER EVOLUTION.
A cardinal close to the pope has ties to the Discovery Institute
http://bobpark.physics.umd.edu/WN05/wn071505.html, but in today's
issue of The Tablet, Britain's Catholic Weekly, Father George
Coyne, an American Jesuit priest and a distinguished astronomer,
directly attacked Cardinal Schoenborn's position on evolution.
5. THE PRINCE: WEALTHY BRITISH FARMER LOOKS TO THE MOON FOR HELP.
Tormented by fears of nanorobots turning the planet into "grey
goo," and poisoning by genetically modified foods, Prince Charles
fights science by embracing homeopathy, coffee enemas, organic
farming, and now "biodynamics," which involves planting according
to cycles of the moon and signs of the Zodiac. In a monarchy you
are stuck with what you get, while in a democracy we can pick the
best qualified among us to lead. But it's only a theory.
THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND.
Opinions are the author's and not necessarily shared by the
University of Maryland, but they should be.
---
.
|
|
| User: "Andy Resnick" |
|
| Title: Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 5 Aug 05 Washington,DC |
08 Aug 2005 08:23:54 AM |
|
|
Sam Wormley wrote:
<snip>
3. THE SCIENCE ADVISOR: THE PRESIDENT HAS A SCIENCE ADVISOR?
Asked by the New York Times to comment, John Marburger responded,
"Evolution is the cornerstone of modern biology .... intelligent
design is not a scientific concept." Good response. It would be
nice if the President's science advisor advised the President.
<snip>
Even though it's Marburger's lot to be stuck in an antiscience
administration, I think he's done a crappy job. The increasing trend to
politicize science (global warming, education standards, NAS peer
review, etc) should be fought much more vigorously and vocally.
--
Andrew Resnick, Ph.D.
Department of Physiology and Biophysics
Case Western Reserve University
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bruce Scott TOK" |
|
| Title: Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 5 Aug 05 Washington, DC |
08 Aug 2005 10:09:49 AM |
|
|
Andy Resnick wrote:
Even though it's Marburger's lot to be stuck in an antiscience
administration, I think he's done a crappy job. The increasing trend to
politicize science (global warming, education standards, NAS peer
review, etc) should be fought much more vigorously and vocally.
It is just the natural result of the "don't rock the boat" culture every
physicist has had to face since at least 1980 (when I started). If you
try to fight things, even if it's just bad standards, you get blamed for
them.
Ultimately, a result of bureaucratisation. People running things even
the main points of which they don't understand.
--
ciao,
Bruce
drift wave turbulence: http://www.rzg.mpg.de/~bds/
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 26 Aug 05 Washington, DC
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 12 Aug 05 Washington, DC
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Aug 05 Washington, DC
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 1 Aug 03 Washington, DC
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 25 Aug 06 Washington, DC
Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 15 Aug 03 Washington, DC
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 18 Aug 06 Washington, DC
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 11 Aug 06 Washington, DC
| WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 4 Aug 06 Washington, DC
Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 8 Aug 03 Washington, DC
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 26 Nov 04 Washington, DC
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 15 Apr 05 Washington, DC
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 17 Nov 06 Washington, DC
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 30 Mar 07 Washington, DC
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 23 Feb 07 Washington, DC
|
|
|
