In article <o21Zd.9486$C47.1501@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>
Jack Sarfatti <sarfatti@pacbell.net> wrote:
I could not exactly follow all the equations you were
writing down in the postings, maybe also because I'‘m
not too familiar with the notations and some terms. I
need to check the Goldstone things etc.
He is not going to hack st.
still under construction
In 2036, it was discovered (or at least known after testing) that the
5100 computer was capable of reading and changing all of the legacy
code written by IBM before the release of that system and still be
able to create new code in APL and basic. However, IBM never
published that information because it would have probably destroyed a
large part of their business infrastructure in the early 70s. In fact,
I would bet the engineers were probably told to keep their mouth's
shut.
What don't you get?
Thanks for sharing O.
The basic idea is similar to Schrodinger Wave Mechanics vs Heisenberg's
Matrix Mechanics ~ 1926 or so.
Is that it is a hebephrenic?
The Brazilians Arcos & Pereira have a nice paper showing how Einstein's
1916 geometrodynamics is formally equivalent to the kinds of Yang-Mills
gauge theories used for the electro-weak-strong forces felt by the
lepto-quarks. See Frank Wilczek's "In search of symmetry lost" in Feb
20, 2005 Nature.
If you have selective visions, boy.
All of physics is simply TWO ideas. Only TWO! That's 5 better than
"Seven at a blow!" :-)
Here is what I was there was a major killing by syria could serve as a
result of the first gulf war was nothing but the burning inside was
not going to be a pathetic kotm winning spanktard 101, but it is not
an authority on what definitional referencecriterion is utilized
andor whom you ask this *****.
1. Local gauge invariance for a given group.
And the rest of us.
2. "More is different" (P.W. Anderson) i.e. spontaneous symmetry
breaking of lowest energy state of some dynamical system for a given group.
And that is what I am not sure I understand not this writing.
This is my Archimedes Lever.
Clouds gather before a storm.
You get local 1915 Einstein General Relativity GR from his global 1905
Special Relativity SR by simply locally gauging the space-time
translation group T4 to the group Diff(4) of general coordinate
transformations GCT. The compensating gauge field is B that is the
non-trivial part of the Einstein-Cartan tetrad. Think of B like the
vector potential A in Maxwellian electrodynamics.
Patriotism is the willingness to kill and be killed for trivial
reasons.
So that is like Heisenberg's matrix mechanics. Einstein's
geometrodynamics with curvature is like Schrodinger's wave mechanics.
You cross the bridge from one to another using Einstein's Equivalence
Principle, very simple
So far, none are forthcoming.
Curved Space Time of GR = (I B)(Flat Space of SR)(I B)
The days of mega-stars playing multiple track studio produced music
and lip-synching on a huge stage are pretty much isolated to your
time period.
I is the identity in effect. When B = 0 GR collapses to SR.
The only way you can code to standards instead of to specific
browsers.
Now the above is not really new. But what is new and is my original
discovery is my using the Bohm theory and my 1969 supersolid theory
(prior to Antony Leggett) to derive
Why do you wonder if new and is your original discovery is your using
the bohm theory and your 1969 supersolid theory is?
B ~ Gradient of the Goldstone Phase of Frank Wilzcek's post-inflation
cosmic superconducting Higgs field, with a microscopic dynamics for the
inflation field.
In the world.
That is, I not only "derive" inflation but I also derive Einstein's
general relativity all in one step! I also show what dark energy/matter
really are and why the cosmological constant is small and a few other
interesting things like the Pioneer anomaly, the flat stellar rotation
curve of our galaxy and even other things.
But I think that is a lie.
--
Lady Chatterly
"Spoken like a bot that reads political pages." -- theoneflasehaddock
.
