| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Maleki" |
| Date: |
13 Jan 2005 12:28:16 PM |
| Object: |
When the crook is the best you get :-) |
Is the source of all your problems also the only source of
advice you have? :-) Hahhahhah :) I've seen this for 30
years and counting.
What charlatans can still get their ways :-(
Stupidity is manufacturable. "Front Page Magazine" is David
Horowitz' PR. Before, he ran propaganda stuff for Marxists,
now he does it for ZioNazis. Some transformation.
Look at the face of this shlombag crook:
http://www.scvcr.org/Resources/horowitz100202.jpeg
If you had a grain of _discretion_ somewhere in you, you
wouldn't build your future on such pulp fictions.
--------------------------
Jewish Front Page Magazine
January 6, 2005
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=16536
The Growing Beijing-Tehran Axis
Frederick W. Stakelbeck Jr.
With the world's attention focused on Iran's continued
development of nuclear weapons and support for the
insurgency in Iraq, what has gone largely unnoticed is
that the country is also in the midst of an extreme
economic transformation.
[...]
--
na khod khori na kas dahi
gonde koni be sag dahi
.
|
|
| User: "Mitch Perkins" |
|
| Title: Re: When the crook is the best you get :-) |
13 Jan 2005 01:08:11 PM |
|
|
Maleki wrote:
Is the source of all your problems also the only source of
advice you have? :-) Hahhahhah :) I've seen this for 30
years and counting.
What charlatans can still get their ways :-(
Stupidity is manufacturable. "Front Page Magazine" is David
Horowitz' PR. Before, he ran propaganda stuff for Marxists,
now he does it for ZioNazis. Some transformation.
Look at the face of this shlombag crook:
http://www.scvcr.org/Resources/horowitz100202.jpeg
If you had a grain of _discretion_ somewhere in you, you
wouldn't build your future on such pulp fictions.
--------------------------
Jewish Front Page Magazine
January 6, 2005
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=16536
The Growing Beijing-Tehran Axis
Frederick W. Stakelbeck Jr.
With the world's attention focused on Iran's continued
development of nuclear weapons and support for the
insurgency in Iraq, what has gone largely unnoticed is
that the country is also in the midst of an extreme
economic transformation.
[...]
--
na khod khori na kas dahi
gonde koni be sag dahi
Hey! Who pays you to read this stuff?
On the topic of physics, you wouldn't happen to know how many orders
of magnitude separate us from the largest order of magnitude, would
you?
I could send you some money for an answer, but probably won't.
Mitch
.
|
|
|
| User: "PD" |
|
| Title: Re: When the crook is the best you get :-) |
13 Jan 2005 01:19:50 PM |
|
|
Mitch Perkins wrote:
[snip]
On the topic of physics, you wouldn't happen to know how many orders
of magnitude separate us from the largest order of magnitude, would
you?
I could send you some money for an answer, but probably won't.
Mitch
Orders of magnitude on what scale?
Distance (our height vs....)
Time (our lifetime vs....)
Speed (walking pace vs....)
Mass (our mass vs....)
Entropy (ours vs....)
Energy (walking pace vs....)
Number of nuclei (ours vs....)
Free time to waste (yours vs....)
Taking your request to be one of these, the answer is 1E44.
Approximately.
PD
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mitch Perkins" |
|
| Title: Re: When the crook is the best you get :-) |
13 Jan 2005 01:33:36 PM |
|
|
PD wrote:
Mitch Perkins wrote:
[snip]
On the topic of physics, you wouldn't happen to know how many
orders
of magnitude separate us from the largest order of magnitude, would
you?
I could send you some money for an answer, but probably won't.
Mitch
Orders of magnitude on what scale?
Distance (our height vs....)
Distance, please. As in the opposite (?) extreme to the Planck
length. Is there a finite set of O's of M, and if so, where are we in
it?
Time (our lifetime vs....)
Speed (walking pace vs....)
Mass (our mass vs....)
Entropy (ours vs....)
Energy (walking pace vs....)
Number of nuclei (ours vs....)
Free time to waste (yours vs....)
Taking your request to be one of these, the answer is 1E44.
Approximately.
PD
:-)
Mitch
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Maleki" |
|
| Title: Re: When the crook is the best you get :-) |
13 Jan 2005 01:49:35 PM |
|
|
On 13 Jan 2005 11:08:11 -0800, Mitch Perkins wrote:
Hey! Who pays you to read this stuff?
Every job I've had I've done well and been paid adequately
for it. That's what matters not the amount of money. None of
my jobs had anything to do with physics (although this can
change somewhat, in near future); because in physics Western
society underpays its scientists. I can do better and more
in physics than the chicken ***** I receive in return. And I
believe this applies to just about every one of you. So quit
flattering/fooling yourself.
On the topic of physics, you wouldn't happen to know how many orders
of magnitude separate us from the largest order of magnitude, would
you?
If you mean largest order of magnitude in _stupidity_ I
actually have a fairly good idea of that.
I could send you some money for an answer, but probably won't.
Mitch
I'd say you'd continue to go back to your "Front Page
Magazine" for information, but, well, you probably won't :)
--
maranjAn delamrA ke in morghe vahshi
ze bAmi ke barkhAst moshkel neshinad
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mitch Perkins" |
|
| Title: Re: When the crook is the best you get :-) |
13 Jan 2005 02:01:36 PM |
|
|
Maleki wrote:
On 13 Jan 2005 11:08:11 -0800, Mitch Perkins wrote:
Hey! Who pays you to read this stuff?
Every job I've had I've done well and been paid adequately
for it. That's what matters not the amount of money. None of
my jobs had anything to do with physics (although this can
change somewhat, in near future); because in physics Western
society underpays its scientists. I can do better and more
in physics than the chicken ***** I receive in return. And I
believe this applies to just about every one of you. So quit
flattering/fooling yourself.
This seems a bit shrill.
On the topic of physics, you wouldn't happen to know how many
orders
of magnitude separate us from the largest order of magnitude, would
you?
If you mean largest order of magnitude in _stupidity_ I
actually have a fairly good idea of that.
"Big" of you to admit it.
I could send you some money for an answer, but probably won't.
Mitch
I'd say you'd continue to go back to your "Front Page
Magazine" for information, but, well, you probably won't :)
It's a toss up...
Mitch
maranjAn delamrA ke in morghe vahshi
ze bAmi ke barkhAst moshkel neshinad
.
|
|
|
| User: "Maleki" |
|
| Title: Re: When the crook is the best you get :-) |
13 Jan 2005 02:19:10 PM |
|
|
On 13 Jan 2005 12:01:36 -0800, Mitch Perkins wrote:
This seems a bit shrill.
That's because you're under the impression that you're going
to live forever (..."If it's chicken ***** now, things can
get better of course." No, things will get worse as you age,
and you'd better get, now, what you're worth. You cowards
have set bad precedences.
--
dami bA gham besar bordan jahAn yeksar nemi'arzad
be mey befrush dalghe mA kazin behtar nemi'arzad
cheh AsAn minemud avval ghame daryA be buye sud
ghalat kardam ke'in tufAn besad gowhar nemi'arzad
cho hAfez dar ghanA'at kusho az donyAye dun bogzar
keyek jow mennate dunAn dosad man zar nemi'arzad
"Hafez"
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Creighton Hogg" |
|
| Title: Re: When the crook is the best you get :-) |
13 Jan 2005 01:50:11 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Maleki wrote:
On 13 Jan 2005 11:08:11 -0800, Mitch Perkins wrote:
Hey! Who pays you to read this stuff?
Every job I've had I've done well and been paid adequately
for it. That's what matters not the amount of money. None of
my jobs had anything to do with physics (although this can
change somewhat, in near future); because in physics Western
society underpays its scientists. I can do better and more
in physics than the chicken ***** I receive in return. And I
believe this applies to just about every one of you. So quit
flattering/fooling yourself.
On the topic of physics, you wouldn't happen to know how many orders
of magnitude separate us from the largest order of magnitude, would
you?
If you mean largest order of magnitude in _stupidity_ I
actually have a fairly good idea of that.
Stupidity is unbounded, there's no largest order of magnitude.
.
|
|
|
| User: "tadchem" |
|
| Title: Re: When the crook is the best you get :-) |
13 Jan 2005 04:12:16 PM |
|
|
"Creighton Hogg" <wchogg@hep.wisc.edu> wrote in message
news:Pine.LNX.4.44.0501131348590.8650-100000@erodium.hep.wisc.edu...
<snip repost>
Stupidity is unbounded, there's no largest order of magnitude.
Agreed. We witness the boundaries being extended daily, right here.
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mitch Perkins" |
|
| Title: More Orders of Magnitude |
17 Jan 2005 01:59:25 PM |
|
|
tadchem wrote:
"Creighton Hogg" <wchogg@hep.wisc.edu> wrote in message
news:Pine.LNX.4.44.0501131348590.8650-100000@erodium.hep.wisc.edu...
<snip repost>
Stupidity is unbounded, there's no largest order of magnitude.
Agreed. We witness the boundaries being extended daily, right here.
How does one extend that which it is agreed does not exist?
Anyway, here's a neat animation dealing with orders of magnitude:
http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/primer/java/scienceopticsu/powersof10/index.html
From 10^-24m to 10^24m is a span of 48 orders of magnitude. It seems
this encompasses all we can currently observe. It seems we are in the
"middle".
Perhaps I have extended that which it is agreed does not exist.
Mitch
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Maleki" |
|
| Title: Re: When the crook is the best you get :-) |
13 Jan 2005 02:24:17 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 13:50:11 -0600, Creighton Hogg wrote:
On the topic of physics, you wouldn't happen to know how many orders
of magnitude separate us from the largest order of magnitude, would
you?
If you mean largest order of magnitude in _stupidity_ I
actually have a fairly good idea of that.
Stupidity is unbounded, there's no largest order of magnitude.
The difference between them isn't.
--
bAre kaj be manzel nemireseh.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
