| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Samegq" |
| Date: |
09 Oct 2004 09:23:01 AM |
| Object: |
Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored? |
Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?
When a bullet is fired, an explosive charge imparts kinetic energy to the
bullet. That kinetic energy travels with the bullet and is transferred to the
target when the bullet strikes. The question to be answered is where that
kinetic energy resides while the bullet is in flight. It obviously travels with
the bullet as is shown by the fact that stopping the bullet anywhere along its
flight path will impart that energy to the stopping means. Where that energy is
stored is revealed by the corrected Lorentz Transformations for Velocity using
the more rational F,L,T system of units. To accomplish this it is first
necessary to correct an error made in the derivation of the Lorentz
Transformation for Transverse Force. Apparently, for some hare-brained reason,
this transformation was apparently derived using Maxwell's Equations instead of
making use of the basic Lorentz Transformations and E=M*C^2 alone. The use of
this approach led to the conclusion that the Lorentz Transformation for
Transverse Force was the reciprocal of its correct value. The fact that an
error existed in that derivation was revealed by the classic "Right Angle Lever
Paradox" which those familiar with undergraduate level physics and/or mechanics
should be able to demolish in a few minutes.
Let us consider that an idealized bullet which, when at rest consists of
three ideal "mass less" springs at right angles to each other and aligned with
one of the springs parallel to the bullets of the path. The "rest mass" of the
bullet is then inserted in the springs by compressing them equally. The energy
stored in each of the springs is half of the product of the distance of the
their compression and their stiffness. When kinetic energy is added to the
bullet, the force compressing the parallel spring is increased by the Lorentz
Transformation for Parallel Force, which is unity, while the distance of
compression is reduced by the Lorentz Transformation for Length and energy must
LEAVE the parallel spring. WE can conclude, as a result, that energy must leave
the parallel spring and travel in the space around it (presumably in a disk
oriented perpendularly to the velocity vector).
In the transverse axes, however, a different situation exists. The
distance which these springs are compressed is unchanged by the velocity but
the force required to compress the spring is INCREASED by the Lorentz
Transformation for Transverse Force. As result, the energy of compression
stored in the transverse springs is increased proportionally. The energy of
compression in these springs is increased in direct proportion to the increase
of kinetic energy of the object. It would appear, therefore, that kinetic
energy is stored within the moving object and in a disk like (perpendicular to
its velocity vector) region of space around the object.
The source material for this posting may be found in "Gravity" (1987),
"The Einstein Hoax" (1997), and "Corrections to Residual Errors in Special
Relativity (1999) located at http://www.members.aol.com/einsteinhoax/site.htm.
EVERYTHING WHICH WE ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE
HAVE ACCEPTED AS TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST
BE MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS
REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP FROM
THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.
All Newsposts by this Website are available at
http://www.members.aol.com/postinglog/newspostings.com
Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on a
regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy as
they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts, please
do not raise objections that are not related to material that you have read at
the Website. This posting is merely a summary.
E-mail:-
The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 5 years.
In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE MATERIAL
PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by individuals who have
mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without questioning it. If anyone
provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be objectively answered, the
material at the Website will be withdrawn.
.
|
|
| User: "ZZBunker" |
|
| Title: Re: Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored? |
09 Oct 2004 09:46:39 PM |
|
|
(Samegq) wrote in message news:<20041009102301.22356.00001658@mb-m16.aol.com>...
Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?
When a bullet is fired, an explosive charge imparts kinetic energy to the
bullet. That kinetic energy travels with the bullet and is transferred to the
target when the bullet strikes. The question to be answered is where that
kinetic energy resides while the bullet is in flight. It obviously travels with
the bullet as is shown by the fact that stopping the bullet anywhere along its
flight path will impart that energy to the stopping means. Where that energy is
The neatest thing about bullets, is that they are
mechanically just like drill bits, and pool sticks.
And they are tertiary weapons, rather than binary weapons,
like a chemist would invent.
So the kinetic energy is always stored where
Engineers want it to stored, rather than
where idiots like Einstian's want it to be
stored.
Hence the kinetic energy of bullets, drill bits,
and pool sticks, and all stored in computers,
and batterys. Rather than in a big fart,
where mathematicians would obviously store kinetic energy.
stored is revealed by the corrected Lorentz Transformations for Velocity using
the more rational F,L,T system of units. To accomplish this it is first
necessary to correct an error made in the derivation of the Lorentz
Transformation for Transverse Force. Apparently, for some hare-brained reason,
this transformation was apparently derived using Maxwell's Equations instead of
making use of the basic Lorentz Transformations and E=M*C^2 alone. The use of
this approach led to the conclusion that the Lorentz Transformation for
Transverse Force was the reciprocal of its correct value. The fact that an
error existed in that derivation was revealed by the classic "Right Angle Lever
Paradox" which those familiar with undergraduate level physics and/or mechanics
should be able to demolish in a few minutes.
Let us consider that an idealized bullet which, when at rest consists of
three ideal "mass less" springs at right angles to each other and aligned with
one of the springs parallel to the bullets of the path. The "rest mass" of the
bullet is then inserted in the springs by compressing them equally. The energy
stored in each of the springs is half of the product of the distance of the
their compression and their stiffness. When kinetic energy is added to the
bullet, the force compressing the parallel spring is increased by the Lorentz
Transformation for Parallel Force, which is unity, while the distance of
compression is reduced by the Lorentz Transformation for Length and energy must
LEAVE the parallel spring. WE can conclude, as a result, that energy must leave
the parallel spring and travel in the space around it (presumably in a disk
oriented perpendularly to the velocity vector).
In the transverse axes, however, a different situation exists. The
distance which these springs are compressed is unchanged by the velocity but
the force required to compress the spring is INCREASED by the Lorentz
Transformation for Transverse Force. As result, the energy of compression
stored in the transverse springs is increased proportionally. The energy of
compression in these springs is increased in direct proportion to the increase
of kinetic energy of the object. It would appear, therefore, that kinetic
energy is stored within the moving object and in a disk like (perpendicular to
its velocity vector) region of space around the object.
The source material for this posting may be found in "Gravity" (1987),
"The Einstein Hoax" (1997), and "Corrections to Residual Errors in Special
Relativity (1999) located at http://www.members.aol.com/einsteinhoax/site.htm.
EVERYTHING WHICH WE ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE
HAVE ACCEPTED AS TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST
BE MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS
REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP FROM
THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.
All Newsposts by this Website are available at
http://www.members.aol.com/postinglog/newspostings.com
Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on a
regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy as
they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts, please
do not raise objections that are not related to material that you have read at
the Website. This posting is merely a summary.
E-mail:-
The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 5 years.
In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE MATERIAL
PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by individuals who have
mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without questioning it. If anyone
provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be objectively answered, the
material at the Website will be withdrawn.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored? |
09 Oct 2004 10:21:46 AM |
|
|
Samegq wrote:
Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?
[snip ignorant crap]
http://www.freefarts.com/farts.html
Move cursor over blinkers to hear Retic's lecture.
Psychotic ineducable boring spammer retic (Ernest Wittke),
You see yourself this way,
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete6.jpg
The entire remainder of the planet sees you this way,
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete3.png
http://www.edu-observatory.org/cranks.html
http://www.pagetutor.com/idiot/idiot.html
http://b5.sdvc.uwyo.edu/bab5/snds/argcstpd.wav
<http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare.swf>
http://www.meninhats.com/d/20040430.html
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/sunshine.jpg
http://www.you-moron.com/
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=group%3Asci.physics+author%3Awittke
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete0.jpg
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete1.png
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete2.png
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete3.png
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete4.png
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete5.jpg
http://www.apa.org/journals/psp/psp7761121.html
http://insti.physics.sunysb.edu/~siegel/quack.html
<http://www.firehead.org/~jessh/film/kubrick/Kubrick-Psycho.html>
<http://www.naturalchild.com/elliott_barker/prisons.html>
The source material for this posting may be found in "Gravity" (1987),
"The Einstein Hoax" (1997), and "Corrections to Residual Errors in Special
Relativity (1999)
[snip]
Hey, stooopid spammer Ernest Wittke - Do you want EVIDENCE? Each of
the 24 GPS satellites carries either four cesium atomic clocks or
three rubidum atomic clocks in orbit, with full relativistic
corrections being applied. NAVSTAR Block II GPS satellites (currently
being launched as replacements) have two rubidium and two cesium
atomic clocks.
Internal inconsistencies in SR (meaning inconsistencies of a purely
mathematical logical nature) automatically lead to contradictions in
number theory, itself, and arithmetic, since the mathematics of
Minkowski geometry is equiconsistent with the theory of real numbers
and with arithmetic.
<http://optoelectronics.perkinelmer.com/content/Datasheets/rfs2f.pdf>
<http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/RelWWW/tests.html>
Mathematics of gravitation
<http://wugrav.wustl.edu/people/CMW/update98.pdf>
<http://www.astro.northwestern.edu/AspenW04/Papers/lorimer1.pdf>
Equivalence Principle testing
http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0111236
Geometric structure of reality
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0103044
http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0307140
GR structure, especially Part 4/p. 7
<http://rattler.cameron.edu/EMIS/journals/LRG/Articles/Volume4/2001-4will/index.html>
http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0311039
<http://www.weburbia.demon.co.uk/physics/experiments.html>
Experimental constraints on General Relativity
<http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/ptti/ptti2002/paper20.pdf>
Nature 425 374 (2003)
<http://rattler.cameron.edu/EMIS/journals/LRG/Articles/Volume6/2003-1ashby/index.html>
http://www.eftaylor.com/pub/projecta.pdf
<http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjjacob/Lecture16.pdf>
Relativity in the GPS system
http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9909014
Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 121101
falling light
<http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/relativ/airtim.html>
Hafele-Keating Experiment
http://www.hawaii.edu/suremath/SRtwinParadox.html
<http://physics.syr.edu/courses/modules/LIGHTCONE/twins.html>
Twin Paradox
Science 303(5661) 1143;1153 (2004)
http://arXiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0401086
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0312071
Deeply relativistic neutron star binaries
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0405160
Black hole evaporation
Physics Today 57(7) 40 (2004)
No aether
http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0409089
Spin-2 gravitons have problems (so does the proposal)
<http://www.npl.washington.edu/eotwash/pdf/prl83-3585.pdf>
http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0301024
Nordtvedt Effect
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0403292
http://arXiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0310723
WMAP + Sloane Digital Sky Survey
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0404175
Dark matter candidates
<http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/March01/Carroll/frames.html>
Carroll on what it all means.
Special Relativity is physics on a topologically trivial Lorentzian
manifold with a metric whose curvature tensor is zero. This is a
perfectly diffeomorphism-invariant condition and does not require
any particular coordinate choice. It is invariant under
the full group of diffeomorphisms. The Poincare group is
the group of *isometries* of the metric in special relativity.
The Special Relativity metric is *non-dynamical* (unlike GR). It
defines the coupling *constants* of your theory. If you change the
metric in any nontrivial way you are changing your theory. An
operation can only be called a "symmetry" of a special-relativistic
(non-gravitational) theory if it preserves the metric, and therefore
the symmetry of special-relativistic theories is the Poincare group
only. General Relativity (gravitation) has a dynamic metric.
NIM A 355 537 (1995)
Physics Letters B 328 103 (1994)
Physical Review Letters 64 1697 (1990)
Physical Review Letters 39 1051 (1977)
Physical Review 135 B1071 (1964)
Physics Letters 12 260 (1964)
Europhysics Letters 56(2) 170-174 (2001)
General Relativity and Gravitation 34(9) 1371 (2002)
http://fourmilab.to/etexts/einstein/specrel/specrel.pdf
<http://www.geocities.com/physics_world/sr/ae_1905_error.htm>
<http://www.physics.gatech.edu/people/faculty/finkelstein/relativity.pdf>
Longitudinal and transverse mass
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0306076.pdf
<http://www.metaresearch.org/solar%20system/gps/absolute-gps-1meter-3.ASP>
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/gpsuser/gpsuser.pdf
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/sigspec/default.htm
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/icd200/default.htm
http://www.trimble.com/gps/index.html
http://sirius.chinalake.navy.mil/satpred/
http://www.phys.lsu.edu/mog/mog9/node9.html
http://egtphysics.net/GPS/RelGPS.htm
http://www.schriever.af.mil/gps/Current/current.oa1
http://edu-observatory.org/gps/gps_books.html
<http://www-astronomy.mps.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast162/Unit5/gps.html>
If anyone
provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be objectively answered, the
material at the Website will be withdrawn.
Right, like your head has ever been withdrawn from your ***** - even
when you *****.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored? |
09 Oct 2004 12:47:00 PM |
|
|
Samegq wrote:
Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?
Kinetic Energy-
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/KineticEnergy.html
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/ConservationofEnergy.html
Crank Information
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=group%3Asci.physics+author%3AGRAVITYMECHANIC
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=group%3Asci.physics+author%3AGRAVITYMECHANIC2
http://www.google.com/search?q=einstein+hoax+site%3Awww.crank.net
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=group%3Asci.physics+author%3Aretic
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=group%3Asci.physics+author%3Aretiche
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=group%3Asci.physics+author%3Areticher
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=group%3Asci.physics+author%3Areticher1
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=group%3Asci.physics+author%3Awittke
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
