Science > Physics > White Holes Related to Spheres, Acceleration, Expansion of Universe
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"OsherD" |
| Date: |
18 Sep 2005 02:17:51 PM |
| Object: |
White Holes Related to Spheres, Acceleration, Expansion of Universe |
From Osher Doctorow
White Holes Related to Spheres, Acceleration, Expansion of Universe
Copyright By Owner Osher Doctorow Ph.D.
First Published 2005
In my recent threads I've argued that the universe is not merely
expanding and accelerating, but that its curvature is approaching that
of a sphere. This is the most plausible scenario under Probable
Influence (PI) Theory, although there is a less plausible scenario
under the same theory in which different cosmology occurs.
John G. Hartnett of U. Western Australia (School of Physics) in "The
accelerating universe data of the high-redshift type Ia supernovae is
consistent with finite bounded expanding white hole universe without
dark matter," astro-ph/0508367 v1 17 Aug 2005, has come up with a
similar scenario without using PI Theory. His paper is a continuation
of his astro-ph/0501526 paper "The distance modulus determined from
Carmeli's cosmology fits the accelerating universe data of the
high-redshift type Ia supernovae without dark matter," which references
Moshe Marmeli of Dept. Physics Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer
Sheva Israel. Carmeli has numerous publications and papers including
gr-qc/0506079 v2 21 Jun 2005 "The cosmic time in terms of the
redshift," with Hartnett and F. J. Oliveira (the latter of Joint
Astronomy Centre, Hilo, Hawaii).
In Hartnett's Aug. 2005 paper, the spherical approach is emphasized.
White holes under the keywords "white holes" in arXiv have 9 "hits"
including Andrew Strominger's 1993 hep-th/9307079 which was published
in Phys.Rev.D48 (1993) 5769-5777, as well as a paper by Kallosh and
Linde, etc. The papers are all between 1993 and 2005 (2 in 2005, 1 in
2004, 1 in 2003, 2 in 2002, etc.).
There are undoubtedly other occurrences of white hole papers under
different keywords in arXiv and/or Front For the Mathematics arXiv.
Looking up "white holes" as just keywords on internet servers may not
produce much recent stuff because until papers like those of Hartnett
and Carmeli's recent paper they weren't considered as plausible
substitutes for dark matter scenarios and for accelerating universe
scenarios.
It is commonly claimed (until very recently anyway) that white holes
violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics. In PI Theory, this is like
saying more or less than Semantics goes in the opposite direction to
Syntactics, which happens to be precisely what PI Theory predicts.
Knowledge/Semantic Information appears to be increasing in the universe
even though Syntactic information ("form" of messages rather than
"meaning") is decreasing and disorder ("entropy") increasing in
Syntactic type Information and arguably matter's form. I gave an
example of this in describing Paul Dirac himself, who achieved
Einstein's (Semantic) Simplicity in Knowledge while minimizing his
verbal language (he replied to questions like the alleged old-time USA
farmer's "yes" or "no"). Of course, Dirac isn't quite the perfect
example since he published extensively. But Pierre de Fermat of 1600s
France who co-discovered Probability and discovered modern Number
Theory among other things, as well as Sir Isaac Newton in his earlier
years, were much better examples of "taciturnity" than Dirac both in
speaking and writing.
How is the previous paragraph possible? Well, just increase the depth
or fundamental nature of the words that you use and diminish the
"frills" or obscure/repetitive type words, and you'll get an idea of
how. As you go deeper, you'll arguably find unifying words that
describe parts of what formerly were described by separate words, and
so on. It is even arguable Einstein's summation convention was an
example, which certainly decreased the overt syntax for equations.
Recent research in black hole physics has also revealed that black
holes are not as "information blocking" as was previously thought,
which is arguably a step in a similar direction. By the way, this
wasn't discovered by the big-name conformists.
Osher Doctorow
.
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
