Science > Physics > Why Age passes slowly in a space ship which has nearly speed of light?
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
14 Sep 2006 09:34:30 AM |
| Object: |
Why Age passes slowly in a space ship which has nearly speed of light? |
I am a college student.
.
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Age passes slowly in a space ship which has nearly speedof light? |
14 Sep 2006 09:42:05 AM |
|
|
Time Dilation
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/TimeDilation.html
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "G. L. Bradford" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Age passes slowly in a space ship which has nearly speed of light? |
15 Sep 2006 07:14:16 AM |
|
|
<faizankhan666@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1158244470.131199.226490@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
I am a college student.
The time passing slowly for the traveler is an illusion that occurs in the
frame of the observer, not in the frame of the traveler. It refers to a
traveler going away from the observer, as observed from that observer's
frame. A lengthening occurs between a traveler going away from an observer
and that observer. The traveler's second appears to lengthen relative to the
observer's second. The traveler will be appearing to be on teh way to
falling behind in time to the observer from either being even in time with
the observer or being more even in time then he will appear to be the more
distance in time, or distance in time and difference in velocity, he gains
from the observer.
The reality will be that information transmission isn't instantaneous
across distances in space and time -- and differences in velocities.
Information transmission doesn't occur at infinite velocity. The traveler
will always be somewhere out front of where all distant observers will place
him in space and time.
So is the time speeding up for the traveler an illusion that occurs in the
frame of the observer, not in the frame of the traveler. It refers to a
traveler oncoming toward the observer, as observed from that observer's
frame. A shortening occurs between a traveler oncoming toward an observer
and that observer. The traveler's second appears to shorten relative to the
observer's second. The traveler will be appearing to be on the way to
catching up to the observer in time from being somewhere behind in time to
the observer.
The reality will be that information transmission isn't instantaneous
across distances in space and time -- and differences in velocities. The
traveler will always be somewhere out front of where all distant observers
will place him in space and time.
In the frame of the traveler, the traveler observes time to speed up
forward of him -- be fast forwarding -- and observes time to slow down
behind him toward even reversing -- strictly in observation of it that is --
the direction of time, the two opposed observations always canceling each
other out leaving his own clock time as the only observation of time that is
not cancelled.
Special Relativity's descriptions, its paintings, splits the difference
into two decidely independent, non-interdependent, non-interacting
dimensions of time. Each one flatly a single-sided physic only...with NO
OTHER SIDE WHATSOEVER.
Actually I shouldn't say SR's "descriptions." I should say physicists
'interpretations' of the physics. They can't seem to put two and two
together to make four. Or, rather, one observed dimension and one observed
dimension and one observed dimension together to make a singularly
indivisible three-dimensionality. Those who have to work with practical
reality such as GPS systems have to and do, but there seems to be no
connection whatsoever between them and the university professor variety. It
means what it says, the Special Theory of Relativity, not the Special Theory
of Reality. The university professor is going to look the fool indeed one
day when the first traveler to travel really fast to a distant star returns
home equally fast and is the age he would be if he had never left home.
If that traveler had traveled to a star ten light years distant from the
Sun, where would the traveler place the
Sun (he observes from ten light years away) in time relative to himself
while being ten light years from it? Where would the observer on Earth --
observationally -- place the traveler in time relative to himself while the
traveler is at a star observed from Earth to be ten light years from the
Sun? If you answered the first question right, you've realized you split the
Sun into two Suns -- one observed, one perceived -- regarding time. If you
answered the second question right, you split the traveler into two
travelers -- one virtually observed traveler, one real traveler, exactly as
you would have to do with the Sun, for exactly the same reason, regarding
time. The split out "virtually observed traveler" would be the only traveler
subject to being observed slowing down in time. That traveler would have to
be slowed down in time in order to be 'virtually' observed ten light years
away from Earth (thus observed to be ten years younger than he would be
observed to be if he were standing next to the observer on Earth). Ten light
years away means the observer on Earth has to be perceptive enough to add
ten years so to zero out the distance difference in time.
So it is with differences in relative velocities as well. If the observer
on Earth observes an oncoming object 300,000 kilometers away from Earth, due
to pass the Earth, to be doing ninety-nine or more percent the speed of
light, that object isn't 300,000 kilometers away. It is immediately in the
process of passing the Earth. It is indeterminately approximately one light
second's distance out in front of the observed light second's distance from
Earth for it by the observer on Earth -- or whatever the instrumentation of
detection on Earth. The same principle of uncertainty rules for it as rules
in quantum mechanics. At that velocity you aren't going to position it by
any detection of position. At any lesser relative velocity all you do is
back the reality up in space and time [toward] where the virtuality is
detected to be in space and time. But where there is any difference to be
detected in relative velocities, objective reality will be out front in
space and time of the objective virtuality. There will be two objects
subject to interpretation rather than one. One, the virtual, which will be
the one observed. One, the real, which won't be observed but has to be
perceived: Has to be projected by whatever degree of projection to be
somewhere out front in space and time of the observed placement whether
oncoming, going away, or even right next to while in process of passing.
Don't let anyone ever tell you that interpretation of physics isn't
information based. And in particular regarding the Theory of Special
Relativity, don't let anyone ever tell you that interpretation of the
physics isn't 'transmission of information' based (specifically time of
transmission based). Or that "transmission" doesn't necessarily mean there
has to then be a split in frames, a split reality, in being.
GLB
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sue..." |
|
| Title: Re: Why Age passes slowly in a space ship which has nearly speed of light? |
14 Sep 2006 09:43:29 AM |
|
|
wrote:
<< I am a college student. >>
Glad to hear it. Learn relativity from credible sources:
"Space time"
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node113.html
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/jk1/lectures/node13.html
"Retarded potential"
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node50.html
"Transformations"
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0204034
Course taught
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching.html
"Visualizations"
http://web.mit.edu/8.02t/www/802TEAL3D/teal_tour.htm
Then you won't be trying to express electromagnetic propagation
in terms of the biology of hair growth.
Sue...
.
|
|
|
| User: "noshellswill" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Age passes slowly in a space ship which has nearly speed of light? |
14 Sep 2006 02:07:24 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 07:43:29 -0700, Sue... wrote:
faizankhan666@gmail.com wrote:
<< I am a college student. >>
Glad to hear it. Learn relativity from credible sources:
"Space time"
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node113.html
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/jk1/lectures/node13.html
"Retarded potential"
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node50.html
"Transformations"
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0204034
Course taught
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching.html
"Visualizations"
http://web.mit.edu/8.02t/www/802TEAL3D/teal_tour.htm
Then you won't be trying to express electromagnetic propagation
in terms of the biology of hair growth.
Sue...
Ms Suzy-Q:
.......... learn, and age quickly? ...%^]...
nss
*********
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Ghost In The Machine" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Age passes slowly in a space ship which has nearly speed of light? |
15 Sep 2006 09:00:09 AM |
|
|
In sci.physics,
<>
wrote
on 14 Sep 2006 07:34:30 -0700
<1158244470.131199.226490@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>:
I am a college student.
The short answer: it doesn't. Not in any sense the travellers would
notice, unless they monitor a signal from Earth.
However, the ship *will* notice that the trip to a distant point
will not take quite as long as expected.
(The actual Lorentz math is left to the interested reader, but
briefly, the trip length will be L/(vg) = L*sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)/v,
instead of the expected L/v.)
--
#191,
Windows Vista. Because it's time to refresh your hardware. Trust us.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sorcerer" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Age passes slowly in a space ship which has nearly speed of light? |
15 Sep 2006 09:06:58 AM |
|
|
"The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@sirius.tg00suus7038.net> wrote in message
news:r7oqt3-k7d.ln1@sirius.tg00suus7038.net...
| In sci.physics,
| <>
| wrote
| on 14 Sep 2006 07:34:30 -0700
| <1158244470.131199.226490@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>:
| > I am a college student.
| >
|
| The short answer: it doesn't.
I am not a college student. The short answer: it does.
Makes a lot of sense, that. :-)
Not in any sense the travellers would
| notice, unless they monitor a signal from Earth.
|
| However, the ship *will* notice that the trip to a distant point
| will not take quite as long as expected.
|
| (The actual Lorentz math is left to the interested reader, but
| briefly, the trip length will be L/(vg) = L*sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)/v,
| instead of the expected L/v.)
The actual Lorentz math is fucking ***** left to the interested reader,
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Rocket/Rocket.htm
but briefly, the trip length will be the expected L and the duration
will be the expected L/v, you shitheaded moron.
Androcles
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "G=EMC^2 Glazier" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Age passes slowly in a space ship which has nearly speedof... |
15 Sep 2006 02:17:36 PM |
|
|
Student Time going slower on a very fast space ship is reality,but best
to keep in mind those people on the space ship can't do any more work
than their counter parts on Earth Sad but true. No free lunch. Its all a
matter of time being diluted by space bert
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Age passes slowly in a space ship which has nearly speedof... |
15 Sep 2006 02:40:11 PM |
|
|
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Student Time going slower on a very fast space ship is reality,but best
to keep in mind those people on the space ship can't do any more work
than their counter parts on Earth Sad but true. No free lunch. Its all a
matter of time being diluted by space bert
What about the ultimate free lunch--the universe?
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Age passes slowly in a space ship which has nearly speed of... |
15 Sep 2006 06:12:42 PM |
|
|
In article <ukDOg.144777$FQ1.85030@attbi_s71>, Sam Wormley <swormley1@mchsi.com> writes:
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Student Time going slower on a very fast space ship is reality,but best
to keep in mind those people on the space ship can't do any more work
than their counter parts on Earth Sad but true. No free lunch. Its all a
matter of time being diluted by space bert
What about the ultimate free lunch--the universe?
You just think it is free because the waiter didn't show up with the
bill yet:-)
Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool,
meron@cars.uchicago.edu | chances are he is doing just the same"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "G=EMC^2 Glazier" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Age passes slowly in a space ship which has nearly speedo... |
15 Sep 2006 05:10:16 PM |
|
|
Sam don't have to take in the whole universe. just the energy of
the Sun would give up a free lunch for another 5 billion years. I should
not talk to you for saying my fastest pictures ever taken in the whole
world are a fake. Shame on you. Bert
.
|
|
|
| User: "hanson" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Age passes slowly in a space ship which has nearly speedo... |
15 Sep 2006 06:02:37 PM |
|
|
.....oye-weh-Zionist Glaser aka "G=EMC^2 Glazier", the bigot,
<herbertglazier@webtv.net> pontificated in his message
news:3952-450B24C8-354@storefull-3336.bay.webtv.net...
I should not talk to you, Sam Wormley, for saying my fastest
pictures ever taken in the whole world are a fake. Shame on you. Bert
[hanson]
ahahaha.... ahahahaha.... AHAHA... Herbie Herbie, Herbie,
Shame or no shame, Hebie, everybody got on to you, long
time ago, because tried to pull a fast one, which you periodically
repeat. But there were never any takers even after all these years
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/9d139adf24f425c5
So, you are right, Herbie, in that "you should not talk about your
picture", but instead you should explain to us why you praise &
adore Israel into high heaven, yet you are NOT able or willing
to give an even simple answer to the question re: Israel, and
instead you do scream more 'Heil Zion', usually accompanied
by your seeding & fomenting of more Anti-Semitism with your
nasty and extremely bigoted comments instead of answering
the simple question:
== What good or benefit has come in return to the American
taxpayers from Israel for all that tax money that came off the
tables from poor American families?"
== "...the USA, which is paying to Israel 3-7 Billion $$$US tax
money each year for the last 60 years & an equal $ amount
to the muslim *****-venters to placate and pacify them so that
they don't continue to kick Jew *****, does beg the question:
==== What are all these BILLIONS of US tax-payer dollars
buying the American public, besides continuous terrorism,
mayhem and war where Jews are being connected to or
involved in ?
------- answer that, oye-weh-Bert -----
PS: in one of your recent nasties, instead of you answering
the above, you said: "Why don't you go to Iran and protect
bin Larden." ... But Herbie, a much more pertinent comment
by you would have been why it is that that one of the "Ten most
Wanted" on the FBI list happens to be a TERRORIST JEW by
name of Adam Pearlman from Riverside, California, aka.
Adam Yahiye Gadahn who is Al Qaida's #3 chieftain. This Jew
turned Muslim threatened that LA and Melbourne will be the
next target of terrorist attacks and "much less compassionate"
then the London & Spain massacres were.. see: 09-12-05
abclocal.go.com/kabc/news/ 102904_nw_american_alQaeda.html
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/31400b26f8948943
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Age passes slowly in a space ship which has nearly speedo... |
15 Sep 2006 06:05:10 PM |
|
|
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Sam don't have to take in the whole universe. just the energy of
the Sun would give up a free lunch for another 5 billion years. I should
not talk to you for saying my fastest pictures ever taken in the whole
world are a fake. Shame on you. Bert
Of course you should talk to me! Just because I point out your
fabrication of circumstances concerning those "photographs" is
no reason you cut off communication. Instead you should articulate
the setup in which you claim it was taken. Reproducibility is one
of the cornerstones of science, Herb.
.
|
|
|
| User: "G=EMC^2 Glazier" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Age passes slowly in a space ship which has nearly speedo... |
17 Sep 2006 02:38:39 PM |
|
|
Sam since I do not use a strobe light,and reality is my fastest picture
can not be taken by a strobe light telling it how I do it(Its secret) is
like Land giving away the way the Polaroid camera works. Bert
.
|
|
|
| User: "hanson" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Age passes slowly in a space ship which has nearly speedo... |
17 Sep 2006 02:50:27 PM |
|
|
...oye-weh-Zionist Glaser aka "G=EMC^2 Glazier", the bigot,
<herbertglazier @ webtv.net> pontificated in his message
news:4963-450DA43F-839@storefull-3331.bay.webtv.net...
Sam .. reality is my fastest picture can not be taken by a
strobe light telling it how I do it (Its secret) is like Land
giving away the way the Polaroid camera works. Bert
[hanson]
ahahaha.... ahahahaha.... AHAHA... Herbie Herbie, Herbie,
Never mind Polaroid, Hebie. Everybody got on to you, long
time ago, because tried to pull a fast one, which you periodically
repeat. But there were never any takers even after all these years
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/9d139adf24f425c5
So, you are right, Herbie, in that "you should not talk about your
picture", but instead you should explain to us why you praise &
adore Israel into high heaven, yet you are NOT able or willing
to give an even simple answer to the question re: Israel, and
instead you do scream more 'Heil Zion', usually accompanied
by your seeding & fomenting of more Anti-Semitism with your
nasty and extremely bigoted comments instead of answering
the simple question:
== What good or benefit has come in return to the American
taxpayers from Israel for all that tax money that came off the
tables from poor American families?"
== "...the USA, which is paying to Israel 3-7 Billion $$$US tax
money each year for the last 60 years & an equal $ amount
to the muslim *****-venters to placate and pacify them so that
they don't continue to kick Jew *****, does beg the question:
==== What are all these BILLIONS of US tax-payer dollars
buying the American public, besides continuous terrorism,
mayhem and war where Jews are being connected to or
involved in ?
------- answer that, oye-weh-Bert -----
PS: in one of your recent nasties, instead of you answering
the above, you said: "Why don't you go to Iran and protect
bin Larden." ... But Herbie, a much more pertinent comment
by you would have been why it is that that one of the "Ten most
Wanted" on the FBI list happens to be a TERRORIST JEW by
name of Adam Pearlman from Riverside, California, aka.
Adam Yahiye Gadahn who is Al Qaida's #3 chieftain. This Jew
turned Muslim threatened that LA and Melbourne will be the
next target of terrorist attacks and "much less compassionate"
then the London & Spain massacres were.. see: 09-12-05
abclocal.go.com/kabc/news/ 102904_nw_american_alQaeda.html
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/31400b26f8948943
.
|
|
|
| User: "=?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=80=A6Relf?=" |
|
| Title: The _Real_ God of the Middle East. |
17 Sep 2006 03:27:12 PM |
|
|
Hi Ha_Ha_Hanson,
Collectively, the U.S. and its partners ( including the IMF ! ) are
the _Real_ God of the Middle East... making Allah and Jehovah look small.
Isreal and Saudi Arabia are under their thumb, controlling the region.
The U.S. and it's partners won WWII,
gaining control of the oil in the " Holy Land ".
They collect rent in the form of oil ( which they lust for like junkies ).
They lay down the law and evict ( or kill ) whoever they please.
.
|
|
|
| User: "T Wake" |
|
| Title: Re: The _Real_ God of the Middle East. |
17 Sep 2006 04:05:56 PM |
|
|
"Jeff.Relf" <Jeff_Relf@Yahoo.COM> wrote in message
news:Jeff_Relf_2006_Sep_17_5ocJ@Cotse.NET...
Hi Ha_Ha_Hanson,
Collectively, the U.S. and its partners ( including the IMF ! ) are
the _Real_ God of the Middle East... making Allah and Jehovah look small.
Isreal and Saudi Arabia are under their thumb, controlling the region.
The U.S. and it's partners won WWII,
gaining control of the oil in the " Holy Land ".
They collect rent in the form of oil ( which they lust for like junkies ).
They lay down the law and evict ( or kill ) whoever they please.
It is mildly interesting how you speak of the "US" as if it were a person
and a person to which you have no affiliations to boot.
Having said that, you are a crank at the best of times so even if you do
answer it will be senseless.
.
|
|
|
| User: "=?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=80=A6Relf?=" |
|
| Title: I am not " the U.S. and its partners ( including the IMF ! ) ". |
17 Sep 2006 04:10:45 PM |
|
|
Hi T_Wake,
Assuming ( against all evidence ) that you could form a decent question...
What was your question here ?
I am not " the U.S. and its partners ( including the IMF ! ) ".
So why should I pretend to be ?
.
|
|
|
| User: "T Wake" |
|
| Title: Re: I am not " the U.S. and its partners ( including the IMF ! ) ". |
17 Sep 2006 04:15:55 PM |
|
|
"Jeff.Relf" <Jeff_Relf@Yahoo.COM> wrote in message
news:Jeff_Relf_2006_Sep_17_CyK4@Cotse.NET...
Hi T_Wake,
Assuming ( against all evidence ) that you could form a decent question...
What was your question here ?
I wasnt asking a question, I meant "answer" in the sense of reply not in the
sense of "answer a question."
I am not " the U.S. and its partners ( including the IMF ! ) ".
So why should I pretend to be ?
Yet you are an American who lives in the US. The US is not a person, yet you
talk like it is one. You speak of it as if it is a person radically
separated from you.
I was correct about your response though.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Age passes slowly in a space ship which has nearly speedo... |
17 Sep 2006 04:42:42 PM |
|
|
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Sam since I do not use a strobe light,and reality is my fastest picture
can not be taken by a strobe light telling it how I do it(Its secret) is
like Land giving away the way the Polaroid camera works. Bert
In science secrets cover up fraud, Herb.
.
|
|
|
| User: "G=EMC^2 Glazier" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Age passes slowly in a space ship which has nearly speedo... |
18 Sep 2006 08:49:36 AM |
|
|
Sam Coke formular is still a secret. Does that make it a fraudulent
drink.Your use of the word "fraud" does not fit,and you know it. Yes
someday I will pattern the way I can take pictures faster than a strobe
light,but until then its my secret Bert
.
|
|
|
| User: "hanson" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Age passes slowly in a space ship which has nearly speedo... |
18 Sep 2006 12:17:38 PM |
|
|
.....oye-weh-Zionist Glaser aka "G=EMC^2 Glazier", the bigot,
<herbertglazier @ webtv.net> pontificated in his message
news:28749-450EA3F0-853@storefull-3335.bay.webtv.net...
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/c082d47400402285
Does that make it fraudulent... the word "fraud" does not fit,
[hanson]
ahahaha... ahahahaha... AHAHA...Herbie Herbie, Herbie
Well, well, well, all the more a reason then why you should
explain how come that you praise & adore Israel into
high heaven, yet why are you NOT able or willing to give an
even simple answer to the question re: Israel, and instead you
do scream more 'Heil Zion', usually accompanied by your
seeding & fomenting of more Anti-Semitism with your nasty
and extremely bigoted comments instead of answering the
simple question:
== What good or benefit has come in return to the American
taxpayers from Israel for all that tax money that came off the
tables from poor American families?"
== "...the USA, which is paying to Israel 3-7 Billion $$$US tax
money each year for the last 60 years & an equal $ amount
to the muslim *****-venters to placate and pacify them so that
they don't continue to kick Jew *****, does beg the question:
==== What are all these BILLIONS of US tax-payer dollars
buying the American public, besides continuous terrorism,
mayhem and war where Jews are being connected to or
involved in ?
------- answer that, oye-weh-Bert -----
PS: in one of your recent nasties, instead of you answering
the above, you said: "Why don't you go to Iran and protect
bin Larden." ... But Herbie, a much more pertinent comment
by you would have been why it is that that one of the "Ten most
Wanted" on the FBI list happens to be a TERRORIST JEW by
name of Adam Pearlman from Riverside, California, aka.
Adam Yahiye Gadahn who is Al Qaida's #3 chieftain. This Jew
turned Muslim threatened that LA and Melbourne will be the
next target of terrorist attacks and "much less compassionate"
then the London & Spain massacres were.. see: 09-12-05
abclocal.go.com/kabc/news/ 102904_nw_american_alQaeda.html
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/31400b26f8948943
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Age passes slowly in a space ship which has nearly speedo... |
18 Sep 2006 09:02:27 AM |
|
|
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Sam Coke formular is still a secret.
Coke is marketing not science--are you confusing the two, Herb?
Does that make it a fraudulent
drink.Your use of the word "fraud" does not fit,and you know it. Yes
someday I will pattern the way I can take pictures faster than a strobe
light,but until then its my secret Bert
Until there is scientific evidence... it's just your imagination.
.
|
|
|
| User: "G=EMC^2 Glazier" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Age passes slowly in a space ship which has nearly speedo... |
18 Sep 2006 02:08:09 PM |
|
|
Sam Formulas are a big part of science thinking. Are you confused with
this fact bert
.
|
|
|
| User: "hanson" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Age passes slowly in a space ship which has nearly speedo... |
18 Sep 2006 03:34:43 PM |
|
|
.....oye-weh-Zionist Glaser aka "G=EMC^2 Glazier", the bigot,
<herbertglazier @ webtv.net> pontificated in his message
news:944-450EEE99-878@storefull-3337.bay.webtv.net...
Sam: Are you confused with this fact... bert
[hanson]
ahahaha... ahahahaha... AHAHA...Herbie Herbie, Herbie
No, neither Sam nor anyone else is confused by this fact
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/9d139adf24f425c5
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/c082d47400402285
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/7afed9e32655d5a3
but are they confused by the fact that you praise & adore Israel
into high heaven, yet why are you NOT able or willing to give an
even simple answer to the question re: Israel, and instead you
do scream more 'Heil Zion', usually accompanied by your
seeding & fomenting of more Anti-Semitism with your nasty
and extremely bigoted comments instead of answering the
simple question:
== What good or benefit has come in return to the American
taxpayers from Israel for all that tax money that came off the
tables from poor American families?"
== "...the USA, which is paying to Israel 3-7 Billion $$$US tax
money each year for the last 60 years & an equal $ amount
to the muslim *****-venters to placate and pacify them so that
they don't continue to kick Jew *****, does beg the question:
==== What are all these BILLIONS of US tax-payer dollars
buying the American public, besides continuous terrorism,
mayhem and war where Jews are being connected to or
involved in ?
------- answer that, oye-weh-Bert -----
PS: in one of your recent nasties, instead of you answering
the above, you said: "Why don't you go to Iran and protect
bin Larden." ... But Herbie, a much more pertinent comment
by you would have been why it is that that one of the "Ten most
Wanted" on the FBI list happens to be a TERRORIST JEW by
name of Adam Pearlman from Riverside, California, aka.
Adam Yahiye Gadahn who is Al Qaida's #3 chieftain. This Jew
turned Muslim threatened that LA and Melbourne will be the
next target of terrorist attacks and "much less compassionate"
then the London & Spain massacres were.. see: 09-12-05
abclocal.go.com/kabc/news/ 102904_nw_american_alQaeda.html
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/31400b26f8948943
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Age passes slowly in a space ship which has nearly speedo... |
18 Sep 2006 02:32:56 PM |
|
|
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Sam Formulas are a big part of science thinking. Are you confused with
this fact bert
Enlighten me, Herb, what formulae are you referring to.
In case you forgot, I'm claiming that you have some photograph
showing some refracted light and you are claiming that you have
an image made with light of shorter duration than strobes. I
say you are bullshitting us... what do you say Herb?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sue..." |
|
| Title: Re: Why Age passes slowly in a space ship which has nearly speed of... |
15 Sep 2006 03:56:47 PM |
|
|
Sam Wormley wrote:
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Student Time going slower on a very fast space ship is reality,but best
to keep in mind those people on the space ship can't do any more work
than their counter parts on Earth Sad but true. No free lunch. Its all a
matter of time being diluted by space bert
<< What about the ultimate free lunch--the universe? >>
If you use that to resolve SR's two postulates then
you are obligated to show how light would stick to
your cell-phone's antenna if the universe stopped
expanding.
I'll take the more traditional applicaton of the the Lorentz
transform where there is matter to exert a Lorentz force.
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node50.html
....but then I don't need an extra two dollars that appers from
nowhrere either. ;-)
Sue...
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
