There is a spherical, inwardly collapsing, standing EM wave caused
by our brains, but why call it God,

Just because the Universe has a state defining wave, and that what
happens within it affects the information contents of that wave,
doesn't mean it can ask or answer Nature's questions, like some
might think. It may sense changes within it, but it is not capable
of a will or a purpose.

The Universe exists because of active information contained in all
kinds of interacting waves,

and if it wasn't for wave superposition,
there would be no Universe.

--
Laurent

-------------------------------------

"George Hammond" <research137@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:fGLEb.403372$Dw6.1252748@attbi_s02...

All of Relativity is the theory of two different
realities two different observers.
Whether they are in relative motion (SR) or
in two different gravitational fields (GR),
Relativity quantitatively relates these two
realities (the coordinate transformation).

The "theory of God" is the same thing. It
turns out that a single observer (a person) has to
deal with the existence of two realities. There
is:

1. Physical reality

2. Perceptual reality

We know that the brain forms an "image" of physical
reality which we assume is in 1:1 relation to actual
reality. We presume that 1=2, that perceptual reality
is identical to actual physical reality. However, I
have discovered that there is a large and fundamental
difference, and that this difference explains "God".

Let me give an example from Relativity, which bears
on this theory of "God".
Suppose two observers watch the Earth from remote
occasions, one on the Moon and one near a Black Hole
in outer space. The observer on the Moon will see the
Earth rotate once every 24 hours according to his own
clock as well as a clock on the Earth. The
observer near the Black Hole will see the Earth spin
at a higher rate, say 2 rev/day according to his
clock, and yet he notices that according to the clock
on Earth it is only rotating once every 24 hours.
This is due to the intense gravitational field near
the Black Hole.

What the "theory of God" says is that this
phenomena is *causally identical* to the case of
two observers watching a Merry-go-round where one of
the observers is an adult, and the other observer is
a 9 year old (half grown) child. The half grown
child is like the observer near the Black Hole, to
him the Merry-go-round appears to be turning "twice
as fast" as it does to the full grown adult. It is
true that both of them agree that the Merry-go-round
is only turning once every 10 seconds according to
the clock on the top of the Merry-go-round, but
according to their own "internal" clocks, it appears
to be going twice as fast to the child. Not only
that, it looks twice as large, just as the Earth
looks twice as large to the observer near a Black Hole.

In other words, the full grown adult
is in "flat perceptual space" while the half
grown child is in a "curved" reality
where he experiences a large time dilation due
to the slowness of his internal clock (mental
speed) and sees a large "magnification" of space
due to the length contraction of his "internal" ruler...
exactly the same as an observer parked near
a Black Hole.

Now of course, there is no "large
gravitational field" in the brain of a child.
The effect is caused by incomplete brain
growth which slows his mental speed, and the
fact that he is only half size which makes the
Merry-go-round appear twice as large.

My discovery posits that:

It is Penrose's Brain Gravity that
mediates human brain growth, and
this is the mechanism by which
"brain gravity" causes a large
perceptual curvature.

Penrose posits that quantum gravitational curvature
"collapses the wavefunction" of ordinary quantum
mechanics. Ordinary quantum mechanics
controls brain growth just as it controls all
chemical reactions. Brain growth (actually the
lack of it) in turn causes perceptual curvature
or "God". It is this causal chain of events
that leads us to say that "gravity is the cause
of God".

My entire paper then, is a description of how this
thesis is proved by causally linking psychometry
space to real space via the Cartesian geometry of
the brain, and how it is experimentally proved by
using Psychometry data. In fact, the thesis is
provable to two decimal point accuracy. God can
actually be physically measured to two decimal
points!

Now, one final point. In the case of the Merry-go-round
we had two observers, one 9 and one 18. But it turns
out that a single person actually embodies two observers.
This is because Science has discovered that no adult
person is actually fully grown. Every adult has a
"terminal growth deficit" according to the discovery
of the Secular Trend in human growth. This means
that all adults will agree that according to the clock
on the Carousel it is turning once every 10 seconds,
but no two of them will agree as to how "fast" it
appears to be turning. Those with low growth (large
growth deficit) will think it is turning very fast
while highly grown specimens will think it is turning
"quite slowly". All observers of the real world are
somewhere between the Moon and a Black Hole as far
as their "personal clocks" and "personal rulers"
are concerned.
This then, is the "scientific explanation" and
"scientific proof" of God.
====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
====================================

There is a spherical, inwardly collapsing, standing EM wave caused
by our brains, but why call it God, or even Cosmic Consciousness?
Why not just call it for what it is - human consciousness?

Just because the Universe has a state defining wave, and that what
happens within it affects the information contents of that wave,
doesn't mean it can ask or answer Nature's questions, like some
might think. It may sense changes within it, but it is not capable
of a will or a purpose.

The Universe exists because of active information contained in all
kinds of interacting waves, and if it wasn't for wave

there would be no Universe. Thanks to the parallel and non-linear
information processing mechanisms inherent to waves there can be a
natural and inevitable information growth.

--
Laurent

-------------------------------------

Here is a good recount of various cognitive and information

theories. I specially agreed with what Scaruffi had to say about
neuroscientists.

Read this, then go back to my site, that way you can see the
differences and the similarities between my views and those of
Henry Stapp, Sir Roger Penrose, David Bohm, Basil Hiley and David
Chalmers.

http://www.thymos.com/science/2001.html

http://www.thymos.com/science/qc.html


My views.

http://cyberdyno1.tripod.com/holistic.html

http://cyberdyno1.tripod.com/consciousness.html

------------------------------------------------------


[Scaruffi]
My theory is not dualistic and is not materialistic. Like

I admit the existence of consciousness as separate from the

properties of matter as we know them;

[Laurent]
Physical and non-material, like Einstein's aether.





[Scaruffi]
but at the same time, like materialists, I consider consciousness

arising from a physical property (that we have not discovered yet)
that behaves in a fundamentally different way from the other
physical properties.

[Laurent]
Because the aether is not matter it isn't bound by spacetime.

the aether is one, has no parts and permeates all that there is,

does not requires the property of motion. Because it does not

it isn't subject to change, thus, it is eternal. And because the
aether was, is, and forever will be, it was before matter and
brains, and because it can't think it has no will or purpose.

thinks through us, we may have a purpose and a will.





[Scaruffi]
So in a sense it is not a "physical" property, but it is still a
property of all matter. Mine is an identity theory, in that I

that mental correspond to neural states, but it goes beyond

because I also think that the property yielding consciousness is
common to all matter, whether it performs neural activity or not.

[Laurent]
That property is oneness, wholeness in space and time, holistic
awareness... and it is possible thanks to the substrate of all
matter and space; namely the aether.

Because of this property, non-locality, FTL communications and
EPR type phenomena are possible.

Consciousness and aether are two different things, but there
wouldn't be any consciousness if it wasn't for the aether and its
oneness.

"George Hammond" <research137@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:fGLEb.403372$Dw6.1252748@attbi_s02...

[gibberish sniped]

Now, one final point. In the case of the Merry-go-round
we had two observers, one 9 and one 18. But it turns
out that a single person actually embodies two observers.
This is because Science has discovered that no adult
person is actually fully grown. Every adult has a
"terminal growth deficit" according to the discovery
of the Secular Trend in human growth. This means
that all adults will agree that according to the clock
on the Carousel it is turning once every 10 seconds,
but no two of them will agree as to how "fast" it
appears to be turning. Those with low growth (large
growth deficit) will think it is turning very fast
while highly grown specimens will think it is turning
"quite slowly".

Does this mean we should set strict height restrictions on Physicists in
order to insure the consistency of their results??? ;-)

"George Hammond" <research137@hotmail.com> wrote in message

All of Relativity is the theory of two different
realities two different observers.
Whether they are in relative motion (SR) or
in two different gravitational fields (GR),
Relativity quantitatively relates these two
realities (the coordinate transformation).

The "theory of God" is the same thing. It
turns out that a single observer (a person) has to
deal with the existence of two realities. There
is:

1. Physical reality

2. Perceptual reality

We know that the brain forms an "image" of physical
reality which we assume is in 1:1 relation to actual
reality. We presume that 1=2, that perceptual reality
is identical to actual physical reality. However, I
have discovered that there is a large and fundamental
difference, and that this difference explains "God".

Let me give an example from Relativity, which bears
on this theory of "God".
Suppose two observers watch the Earth from remote
ocations, one on the Moon and one near a Black Hole
in outer space. The observer on the Moon will see the
Earth rotate once every 24 hours according to his own
clock as well as a clock on the Earth. The
observer near the Black Hole will see the Earth spin
at a higher rate, say 2 rev/day according to his
clock, and yet he notices that according to the clock
on Earth it is only rotating once every 24 hours.
This is due to the iintense gravitational field near
the Black Hole.

What the "theory of God" says is that this
phenomena is *causally identical* to the case of
two observers watching a Merry-go-round where one of
the observers is an adult, and the other observer is
a 9 year old (half grown) child. The half grown
child is like the observer near the Black Hole, to
him the Merry-go-round appears to be turning "twice
as fast" as it does to the full grown adult. It is
true that both of them agree that the Merry-go-round
is only turning once every 10 seconds according to
the clock on the top of the Merry-go-round, but
according to their own "internal" clocks, it appears
to be going twice as fast to the child. Not only
that, it looks twice as large, just as the Earth
looks twice as large to the observer near a Black Hole.

In other words, the full grown adult
is in "flat perceptual space" while the half
grown child is in a "curved" reality
where he experiencez a large time dilation due
to the slowness of his internal clock (mental
speed) and sees a large "magnification" of space
due to the length contraction of his "internal" ruler...
exactly the same as an observer parked near
a Black Hole.

Now of course, there is no "large
gravitational field" in the brain of a child.
The effect is caused by incomplete brain
growth which slows his mental speed, and the
fact that he is only half size which makes the
Merry-go-round appear twice as large.

My discovery posits that:

It is Penrose's Brain Gravity that
mediates human brain growth, and
this is the mechanism by which
"brain gravity" causes a large
perceptual curvature.

Penrose posits that quantum gravitational curvature
"collapses the wavefunction" of ordinary quantum
mechanics. Ordinary quantum mechanics
controls brain growth just as it controls all
chemical reactions. Brain growth (actually the
lack of it) in turn causes perceptual curvature
or "God". It is this causal chain of events
that leads us to say that "gravity is the cause
of God".

My entire paper then, is a description of how this
thesis is proved by causally linking psychometry
space to real space via the Cartesian geometry of
the brain, and how it is experimentally proved by
using Psychometry data. In fact, the thesis is
provable to two decimal point accuracy. God can
actually be physically measured to two decimal
points!

Now, one final point. In the case of the Merry-go-round
we had two observers, one 9 and one 18. But it turns
out that a single person actually embodies two observers.
This is because Science has discovered that no adult
person is actually fully grown. Every adult has a
"terminal growth deficit" according to the discovery
of the Secular Trend in human growth. This means
that all adults will agree that according to the clock
on the Carousel it is turning once every 10 seconds,
but no two of them will agree as to how "fast" it
appears to be turning. Those with low growth (large
growth deficit) will think it is turning very fast
while highly grown specimens will think it is turning
"quite slowly". All observers of the real world are
somewhere between the Moon and a Black Hole as far
as their "personal clocks" and "personal rulers"
are concerned.
This then, is the "scientific explanation" and
"scientific proof" of God.
====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
====================================

"Here is a little episode about Einstein and his long-time secretary
(1928-1955, and after Einstein's death, became a guardian of his name,
together with Otto Nathan) Helen Dukas: "If asked to explain
relativity, she would sometimes offer an explanation that he
personally devised for her: an hour sitting with a pretty girl passes
like a minuite, but a minuite sitting on a hot stove seems like an
hour." (Roger Highfield & Paul Carter, The Private Lives of Albert
Einstein, St. Martin's Press, 1993, 211)"

http://www.bun.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~suchii/gen.GR.html

I wonder sometimes if we have not figured out the gravity of the
situation:)


Sol

"George Hammond" <research137@hotmail.com> wrote:

All of Relativity is the theory of two different
realities two different observers.
Whether they are in relative motion (SR) or
in two different gravitational fields (GR),
Relativity quantitatively relates these two
realities (the coordinate transformation).

The "theory of God" is the same thing. It
turns out that a single observer (a person) has to
deal with the existence of two realities. There
is:

1. Physical reality

2. Perceptual reality

3. Hammond reality

Heh!

Jim

George Hammond wrote:

All of Relativity is the theory of two different
realities two different observers.
Whether they are in relative motion (SR) or
in two different gravitational fields (GR),
Relativity quantitatively relates these two
realities (the coordinate transformation).

The "theory of God" is the same thing. It
turns out that a single observer (a person) has to
deal with the existence of two realities. There
is:

1. Physical reality

2. Perceptual reality

We know that the brain forms an "image" of physical
reality which we assume is in 1:1 relation to actual
reality. We presume that 1=2, that perceptual reality
is identical to actual physical reality. However, I
have discovered that there is a large and fundamental
difference, and that this difference explains "God".

Let me give an example from Relativity, which bears
on this theory of "God".
Suppose two observers watch the Earth from remote
ocations, one on the Moon and one near a Black Hole
in outer space. The observer on the Moon will see the
Earth rotate once every 24 hours according to his own
clock as well as a clock on the Earth. The
observer near the Black Hole will see the Earth spin
at a higher rate, say 2 rev/day according to his
clock, and yet he notices that according to the clock
on Earth it is only rotating once every 24 hours.
This is due to the iintense gravitational field near
the Black Hole.

What the "theory of God" says is that this
phenomena is *causally identical* to the case of
two observers watching a Merry-go-round where one of
the observers is an adult, and the other observer is
a 9 year old (half grown) child. The half grown
child is like the observer near the Black Hole, to
him the Merry-go-round appears to be turning "twice
as fast" as it does to the full grown adult. It is
true that both of them agree that the Merry-go-round
is only turning once every 10 seconds according to
the clock on the top of the Merry-go-round, but
according to their own "internal" clocks, it appears
to be going twice as fast to the child. Not only
that, it looks twice as large, just as the Earth
looks twice as large to the observer near a Black Hole.

In other words, the full grown adult
is in "flat perceptual space" while the half
grown child is in a "curved" reality
where he experiencez a large time dilation due
to the slowness of his internal clock (mental
speed) and sees a large "magnification" of space
due to the length contraction of his "internal" ruler...
exactly the same as an observer parked near
a Black Hole.

Now of course, there is no "large
gravitational field" in the brain of a child.
The effect is caused by incomplete brain
growth which slows his mental speed, and the
fact that he is only half size which makes the
Merry-go-round appear twice as large.

My discovery posits that:

It is Penrose's Brain Gravity that
mediates human brain growth, and
this is the mechanism by which
"brain gravity" causes a large
perceptual curvature.

Penrose posits that quantum gravitational curvature
"collapses the wavefunction" of ordinary quantum
mechanics. Ordinary quantum mechanics
controls brain growth just as it controls all
chemical reactions. Brain growth (actually the
lack of it) in turn causes perceptual curvature
or "God". It is this causal chain of events
that leads us to say that "gravity is the cause
of God".

My entire paper then, is a description of how this
thesis is proved by causally linking psychometry
space to real space via the Cartesian geometry of
the brain, and how it is experimentally proved by
using Psychometry data. In fact, the thesis is
provable to two decimal point accuracy. God can
actually be physically measured to two decimal
points!

Now, one final point. In the case of the Merry-go-round
we had two observers, one 9 and one 18. But it turns
out that a single person actually embodies two observers.
This is because Science has discovered that no adult
person is actually fully grown. Every adult has a
"terminal growth deficit" according to the discovery
of the Secular Trend in human growth. This means
that all adults will agree that according to the clock
on the Carousel it is turning once every 10 seconds,
but no two of them will agree as to how "fast" it
appears to be turning. Those with low growth (large
growth deficit) will think it is turning very fast
while highly grown specimens will think it is turning
"quite slowly". All observers of the real world are
somewhere between the Moon and a Black Hole as far
as their "personal clocks" and "personal rulers"
are concerned.
This then, is the "scientific explanation" and
"scientific proof" of God.
====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
====================================

Theory of relativity is not compatible with the workings of the mind.

George

Catholics are even forbidden from reading their bible.