WHY GOD HAS TWO LEGS

...and how it causes the "cruciform"
shape of the Human Body and results
in the scientific proof of God (SPOG)


[Hammond]
The SPOG (Scientific Proof of God, Hammond 2003, peer
reviewed literature)

shows that "God" is an invisible man,

WHY GOD HAS TWO LEGS

WHY GOD HAS TWO LEGS

...and how it causes the "cruciform"
shape of the Human Body and results
in the scientific proof of God (SPOG)

WHY GOD HAS TWO LEGS

...and how it causes the "cruciform"
shape of the Human Body and results
in the scientific proof of God (SPOG)

[Hammond]
The SPOG (Scientific Proof of God, Hammond 2003, peer
reviewed literature) shows that "God" is an invisible man,
i.e. he is the part of Man that is not fully grown and
therefore is "invisible" but because the less than fully
grown part of the BRAIN causes what is called the
"unconscious mind" God is actually real and this "brain
growth deficit" causes a Curvature of Subjective Reality and
this phenomenon has been called "God" for thousands of
years.
As we know Man is a 4 legged animal who is simply
standing on his hind legs. In fact ALL higher animals are
4-legged animals, and there is an AXIOMATIC reason for
this... and a reason why there is no such thing as a
3-legged animal. The REASON "God has 2 legs" is because
spacetime itself is RIEMANNIAN.
Many PhD's in Physics are familiar with General
Relativity, but few of them can tell you why real space is
Riemannian (i.e. has a quadratic, "square", metric), yet,
this is one of the most fundamental questions underlying
General Relativity in the first place.
In fact, it is the answer to "why there are no 3-legged
animals", and this common and blatant fact is in itself one
of the most elementary arguments that it is the geometry of
space that causes the cruciform shape of the human body
(which by the way is the REASON that the Cross is axiomatic
and the central icon of Religion).
As an example of what you have to know in order to
understand a simple fact such as why there are "no 3-legged
animals" is the fact that:

A SOLID OBJECT CANNOT BE ROTATED
IN NON-RIEMANNIAN SPACE

Now, for the amateur, let me point out that the terms:

Euclidean Space
Cartesian Space
Pythagorean Space
Riemannian Space

ALL MEAN THE SAME THING vis a vis one fundamental fact:

They all refer to spaces that
have a "homogeneous quadratic
metric".

The simplest example of a "homogenous quadratic metric" is
simple Euclidean space:

dR^2 = dX^2 + dY^2 +dZ^2 (Pythagorean theorem)
Note that this is the equation for a SQUARE. The
Pythagorean Theorem is just the equation for the diagonal of
a SQUARE or a CUBE. This is why we say space is "square"...
simply because this law is known to hold true in real space.
All 4 of the above spaces are referred to as "Riemannian"
for this reason. Euclidean space is merely a special case
of a Riemannian space that has zero curvature (flat space).
However, there are non-Riemannian spaces. For instance if
you define the line element to be:

dR^3 = dX^3 + dY^3 + dZ^3

this is a NON-RIEMANNIAN METRIC (it is not a quadratic
form). It will NOT give you the correct length of a diagonal
for a square or a cube.

Interestingly, HELMHOLTZ apparently was the first to show
that:

YOU CANNOT ROTATE A SOLID BODY
IN A NON-RIEMANNIAN SPACE:

See: http://www.bun.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~suchii/R&H.html

This was later proven rigorously by Weyl and others.
For instance Weyl in Space, Time & Matter (1920)
discusses in the closing pages of ChII, Riemann's
famous remark that:

The metric of real space "might be a homogenous
function of the 4th order in the differentials,
or even a function built up in some other way,
and that it might not even depend rationally on
the differentials."

(Weyl, quoting Riemann, ibid ChII, pp 138-148)

Weyl goes on to demonstrate that the "rotation group"
requires that the metric be a QUADRATIC form, and has proven
this for 3 dimensions (the case under discussion here).
Finally of course, for the benefit of eager PhD's in
physics lest they make the same amateur error Dr. Xxxxxx
Xxxxxx has recently made, "curvature" is not the issue here,
the existence of a "quadratic metric" is the issue. Any
space that DOES NOT HAVE a quadratic metric is
non-Riemannian, and of interest, is the fact that:

YOU CANNOT ROTATE A SOLID BODY
IN A NON-RIEMANNIAN SPACE

This of course, tells us WHY "Real Space" has to be
Riemannian. If it were not Riemannian (square), you
couldn't even turn your head! Incidentally, also included in
the definition of Riemannian, is the fact that the metric,
even when there is curvature present, MUST reduce to a pure
Euclidean quadratic for small distances. This is a
fundamental theorem in general Relativity where it is
known as the "Equivalence Principle".
At any rate, getting back to the matter of "why there are
no 3-legged animals", what we see is the following. First,
real space is Riemannian, which means that it is Euclidean
to first order. Real (3D) space, locally obeys the
Pythagorean theorem (and we have just finished explaining
WHY):
dR^2 = dX^2 + dY^2 +dZ^2 (Pythagorean
Theorem)

Now, it is well known that several simple "Coordinate
systems" can be constructed in such a space:

Cartesian coordinates
Polar coordinates
Cylindrical coordinates
Spherical coordinates

and all of them obey the "quadratic metrical law" of REAL
SPACE.
Now here comes the interesting part. A MACHINE it turns
out (in it's simplest form) is nothing more than a
"mechanical coordinate system". Which means that all
"simple machines" that we see are generally one of the above
4 mechanical structures. For instance we all remember being
told about "simple machines" in grade school:

Lever = 1-axis Cartesian coordinate machine
Pulley = Polar coordinate machine
Screw = Cylindrical coordinate machine
Wheel = Polar coordinate machine

We see that the "simple machines" are all simple mechanical
models of the fundamental (Euclidean) "coordinate systems".
The same holds for more complicated machines:

Gears = Polar coordinate machine
Jib boom = Spherical coordinate machine
Ball bearing = Spherical coordinate machine
Airplane = 3-axis Cartesian coordinate machine
Human Body = 3-axis Cartesian coordinate machine
etc.

OBVIOUSLY, the most common of all is the "Cartesian machine"
or SQUARE MACHINE. Cartesian coordinates may also be called
"cruciform coordinates", in fact we see, that the Cross of
Christianity is nothing more than the "Cartesian coordinate
system" itself. And, as histories number one Psychology
instruction, a person has been traditionally nailed to it
for 2,000 years to dramatically demonstrate the Cartesian
geometry of the human body, brain, Psychology, and God to
the ignorant and terrified population. Let us hope, after
the establishment of the scientific explanation of God, this
historical abomination can be removed from the True-Cross
perhaps by Vatican decree.
For instance a t.v., typewriter, airplane, even a fish,
are all "square machines":

http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/Fig1.jpg

Obviously, the CARTESIAN MACHINE or SQUARE MACHINE is the
simplest kind of machine to mechanically construct. It is
for this reason that the BODY PLAN of all living things,
both plants and animals is Cartesian (Square). Life forms,
that is Plants and Animals are "Cartesian Machines", and
this notably includes HUMAN BEINGS.
See:

Plants:http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/SEED.jpg

Vertebrate body:http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/Fig2an3.jpg
(Note orthogonality of Medial, Transverse and Horizontal
septum's which intersect at right angles to form the 3
Cartesian body axes of the generalized vertebrate body plan)
Humans:http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/ILLU1.jpg
(Note Cartesian axes of the human body, Spinal,
Bilateral, Dorso-ventral)

Because a square is bilaterally symmetric, all of the
higher Animal Phyla are BILATERAL (7 out of 9 Phyla) in fact
only the two lowest animal Phyla (jellyfish) which are after
all "legless" animals to begin with, are not Bilateral (they
are radial). Any animal with "legs" is Cartesian and
therefore Bilateral, and the "legs" will appear in Bilateral
pairs. Starfish actually have a bilateral larval form.
Therefore, there "is no such thing as a 3 legged animal".
The "Cartesian Body Plan" cannot produce such a thing, and
furthermore, it defies the "quadratic geometry" of the space
which produced the "Cartesian Animal' in the first place. In
a bilateral or "cartesian" machine standing in a plane, 4 is
the minimum number of legs that will produce stability. 3 is
not possible because bilateral symmetry (cartesian symmetry)
is imposed.
Now, beyond all this, what we see is that the "geometric
properties of space itself" are the CAUSAL FORCE that
determines the geometrical shape of the human body. Because
of this, it turns out that the "geometrical shape of the
brain" is also determined and is found to be "3-axis
Cartesian" in SHAPE (notice I said SHAPE, not volume).
The Brain actually has Axes of mechanical symmetry, just
like the Body:

Human Brain:http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/ILLU2.jpghttp://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/Fig14.jpghttp://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/Fig15.jpg

(Note the mirror symmetric motor sensory map of
the body in the brain in the above two URL's)
The structure of the brain is "3-axis Cartesian"
because of this, and produces a 3-axis Cartesian
structure in Psychometric eigenvector space)

Ultimately, this leads to a 3-Axis Cartesian structure in
Psychometric (eigenvector space), see:

http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/ILLU4.jpg

And therefore, we see that the whole mathematical
geometry of PSYCHOLOGY is caused by the mathematical
geometry of REAL SPACE itself.
Finally, in one of the most stunning developments of
modern science, Hammond (1994, 1997) has discovered that
because REAL ...

read more >>

WHY GOD HAS TWO LEGS

WHY GOD HAS TWO LEGS

...and how it causes the "cruciform"
shape of the Human Body and results
in the scientific proof of God (SPOG)


[Hammond]
The SPOG (Scientific Proof of God, Hammond 2003, peer
reviewed literature) shows that "God" is an invisible man,
i.e. he is the part of Man that is not fully grown and
therefore is "invisible" but because the less than fully
grown part of the BRAIN causes what is called the
"unconscious mind" God is actually real and this "brain
growth deficit" causes a Curvature of Subjective Reality and
this phenomenon has been called "God" for thousands of
years.
As we know Man is a 4 legged animal who is simply
standing on his hind legs. In fact ALL higher animals are
4-legged animals, and there is an AXIOMATIC reason for
this... and a reason why there is no such thing as a
3-legged animal. The REASON "God has 2 legs" is because
spacetime itself is RIEMANNIAN.
Many PhD's in Physics are familiar with General
Relativity, but few of them can tell you why real space is
Riemannian (i.e. has a quadratic, "square", metric), yet,
this is one of the most fundamental questions underlying
General Relativity in the first place.
In fact, it is the answer to "why there are no 3-legged
animals", and this common and blatant fact is in itself one
of the most elementary arguments that it is the geometry of
space that causes the cruciform shape of the human body
(which by the way is the REASON that the Cross is axiomatic
and the central icon of Religion).
As an example of what you have to know in order to
understand a simple fact such as why there are "no 3-legged
animals" is the fact that:

A SOLID OBJECT CANNOT BE ROTATED
IN NON-RIEMANNIAN SPACE

Now, for the amateur, let me point out that the terms:

Euclidean Space
Cartesian Space
Pythagorean Space
Riemannian Space

ALL MEAN THE SAME THING vis a vis one fundamental fact:

They all refer to spaces that
have a "homogeneous quadratic
metric".

The simplest example of a "homogenous quadratic metric" is
simple Euclidean space:

dR^2 = dX^2 + dY^2 +dZ^2 (Pythagorean theorem)
Note that this is the equation for a SQUARE. The
Pythagorean Theorem is just the equation for the diagonal of
a SQUARE or a CUBE. This is why we say space is "square"...
simply because this law is known to hold true in real space.
All 4 of the above spaces are referred to as "Riemannian"
for this reason. Euclidean space is merely a special case
of a Riemannian space that has zero curvature (flat space).
However, there are non-Riemannian spaces. For instance if
you define the line element to be:

dR^3 = dX^3 + dY^3 + dZ^3

this is a NON-RIEMANNIAN METRIC (it is not a quadratic
form). It will NOT give you the correct length of a diagonal
for a square or a cube.

Interestingly, HELMHOLTZ apparently was the first to show
that:

YOU CANNOT ROTATE A SOLID BODY
IN A NON-RIEMANNIAN SPACE:

See: http://www.bun.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~suchii/R&H.html

This was later proven rigorously by Weyl and others.
For instance Weyl in Space, Time & Matter (1920)
discusses in the closing pages of ChII, Riemann's
famous remark that:

The metric of real space "might be a homogenous
function of the 4th order in the differentials,
or even a function built up in some other way,
and that it might not even depend rationally on
the differentials."

(Weyl, quoting Riemann, ibid ChII, pp 138-148)

Weyl goes on to demonstrate that the "rotation group"
requires that the metric be a QUADRATIC form, and has proven
this for 3 dimensions (the case under discussion here).
Finally of course, for the benefit of eager PhD's in
physics lest they make the same amateur error Dr. Xxxxxx
Xxxxxx has recently made, "curvature" is not the issue here,
the existence of a "quadratic metric" is the issue. Any
space that DOES NOT HAVE a quadratic metric is
non-Riemannian, and of interest, is the fact that:

YOU CANNOT ROTATE A SOLID BODY
IN A NON-RIEMANNIAN SPACE

This of course, tells us WHY "Real Space" has to be
Riemannian. If it were not Riemannian (square), you
couldn't even turn your head! Incidentally, also included in
the definition of Riemannian, is the fact that the metric,
even when there is curvature present, MUST reduce to a pure
Euclidean quadratic for small distances. This is a
fundamental theorem in general Relativity where it is
known as the "Equivalence Principle".
At any rate, getting back to the matter of "why there are
no 3-legged animals", what we see is the following. First,
real space is Riemannian, which means that it is Euclidean
to first order. Real (3D) space, locally obeys the
Pythagorean theorem (and we have just finished explaining
WHY):
dR^2 = dX^2 + dY^2 +dZ^2 (Pythagorean
Theorem)

Now, it is well known that several simple "Coordinate
systems" can be constructed in such a space:

Cartesian coordinates
Polar coordinates
Cylindrical coordinates
Spherical coordinates

and all of them obey the "quadratic metrical law" of REAL
SPACE.
Now here comes the interesting part. A MACHINE it turns
out (in it's simplest form) is nothing more than a
"mechanical coordinate system". Which means that all
"simple machines" that we see are generally one of the above
4 mechanical structures. For instance we all remember being
told about "simple machines" in grade school:

Lever = 1-axis Cartesian coordinate machine
Pulley = Polar coordinate machine
Screw = Cylindrical coordinate machine
Wheel = Polar coordinate machine

We see that the "simple machines" are all simple mechanical
models of the fundamental (Euclidean) "coordinate systems".
The same holds for more complicated machines:

Gears = Polar coordinate machine
Jib boom = Spherical coordinate machine
Ball bearing = Spherical coordinate machine
Airplane = 3-axis Cartesian coordinate machine
Human Body = 3-axis Cartesian coordinate machine
etc.

OBVIOUSLY, the most common of all is the "Cartesian machine"
or SQUARE MACHINE. Cartesian coordinates may also be called
"cruciform coordinates", in fact we see, that the Cross of
Christianity is nothing more than the "Cartesian coordinate
system" itself. And, as histories number one Psychology
instruction, a person has been traditionally nailed to it
for 2,000 years to dramatically demonstrate the Cartesian
geometry of the human body, brain, Psychology, and God to
the ignorant and terrified population. Let us hope, after
the establishment of the scientific explanation of God, this
historical abomination can be removed from the True-Cross
perhaps by Vatican decree.
For instance a t.v., typewriter, airplane, even a fish,
are all "square machines":

http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/Fig1.jpg

Obviously, the CARTESIAN MACHINE or SQUARE MACHINE is the
simplest kind of machine to mechanically construct. It is
for this reason that the BODY PLAN of all living things,
both plants and animals is Cartesian (Square). Life forms,
that is Plants and Animals are "Cartesian Machines", and
this notably includes HUMAN BEINGS.
See:

Plants:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/SEED.jpg

Vertebrate body:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/Fig2an3.jpg
(Note orthogonality of Medial, Transverse and Horizontal
septum's which intersect at right angles to form the 3
Cartesian body axes of the generalized vertebrate body plan)
Humans:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/ILLU1.jpg
(Note Cartesian axes of the human body, Spinal,
Bilateral, Dorso-ventral)

Because a square is bilaterally symmetric, all of the
higher Animal Phyla are BILATERAL (7 out of 9 Phyla) in fact
only the two lowest animal Phyla (jellyfish) which are after
all "legless" animals to begin with, are not Bilateral (they
are radial). Any animal with "legs" is Cartesian and
therefore Bilateral, and the "legs" will appear in Bilateral
pairs. Starfish actually have a bilateral larval form.
Therefore, there "is no such thing as a 3 legged animal".
The "Cartesian Body Plan" cannot produce such a thing, and
furthermore, it defies the "quadratic geometry" of the space
which produced the "Cartesian Animal' in the first place. In
a bilateral or "cartesian" machine standing in a plane, 4 is
the minimum number of legs that will produce stability. 3 is
not possible because bilateral symmetry (cartesian symmetry)
is imposed.
Now, beyond all this, what we see is that the "geometric
properties of space itself" are the CAUSAL FORCE that
determines the geometrical shape of the human body. Because
of this, it turns out that the "geometrical shape of the
brain" is also determined and is found to be "3-axis
Cartesian" in SHAPE (notice I said SHAPE, not volume).
The Brain actually has Axes of mechanical symmetry, just
like the Body:

Human Brain:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/ILLU2.jpg
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/Fig14.jpg
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/Fig15.jpg

(Note the mirror symmetric motor sensory map of
the body in the brain in the above two URL's)
The structure of the brain is "3-axis Cartesian"
because of this, and produces a 3-axis Cartesian
structure in Psychometric eigenvector space)


Ultimately, this leads to a 3-Axis Cartesian structure in
Psychometric (eigenvector space), see:

http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/ILLU4.jpg

And therefore, we see that the whole mathematical
geometry of PSYCHOLOGY is caused by the mathematical
geometry of REAL SPACE itself.
Finally, in one of the most stunning developments of
modern science, Hammond (1994, 1997) has discovered that
because REAL SPACE causes the structure of PSYCHOLOGY SPACE,
that there is a "curvature" in psychometric space which is
caused by the "curvature" of REAL SPACE. And to sum it all
up, since this curvature in psychometric Space is easily and
IMMEDIATELY identified as "God", we see that "Gravity is the
cause of God". IOW, the scientific proof of God has been
discovered.
Now as you can see, God is not about to be readily
understood by a layman. A layman cannot even figure out why
there are no "3-legged" animals! If Dr. Xxxxxx Xxxxxx is
any example, some PhD's in Physics can't even understand it.
Finally, lest anyone get the idea that this discovery only
points to some exotic relativistic quantity that cannot
really be demonstrated to be "God", let me point out that
Gravitational Curvature is only the "ultimate" explanation
of God, in fact, the Secular Trend in brain growth turns out
to be the direct biological cause of God, see:

Growth curve deficit:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/growth5.JPG

Secular trend in growth:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/seculartrend.jpg
IOW, as Sir Roger Penrose pointed out in Shadows of the Mind
(1994), Gravitational Curvature on the quantum level ('brain
gravity') mediates brain growth itself and mediates both the
Secular Trend and the Flynn Effect. Brain growth
(percentage wise) can be easily seen to provide a compelling
and elementary explanation of the history of "God" and an
explanation of the Bible, miracles, revelation, Creation,
Heaven, Eternal Life, etc. etc. This understanding is well
within the grasp of scientific layman, even if they can't
understand how "Gravity" causes it (see my website below for
details).
So, the message remains, for any one who is actually
seriously interested in whether there is a God or not, that-
The scientific proof that there is an ACTUAL REAL GOD has
been discovered, found to be an axiomatic law of Physics,
and has been experimentally confirmed.

--
Be sure to visit my web site below
========================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
========================================