X.EXE's " Power Rating "



 Science > Physics > X.EXE's " Power Rating "

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "=?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=80=A6Relf?="
Date: 02 Jun 2007 05:21:12 AM
Object: X.EXE's " Power Rating "
Congradulations, Mr. 詹光耀,
You made the top of X.EXE's " Power Rating " this week.
The Power Rating uses multiple passes to recursively determine
who got ( and, therefore, could spend ) the most votes.
Voting ( i.e. replying to someone ) is like spending money.
Receiving votes ( i.e. getting replies ) is like earning money.
Before each pass, votes are divided by the number of posts made;
but crossposting to 7 groups, for example, counts as 7 posts.
The ranking is by: " Power = Votes_Received / Posts_Made ".
Power Rating ( 10.4 Days, 171 participants ):
詹光耀( 12.2, 1 ), ericmatteson200( 11, 2 ), Anonymous( 8.35, 1 )
George_Orwell( 6.4, 1 ), bob( 5.42, 1 ), Richard_Rasker( 5.32, 7 )
digger_junkie( 4.6, 2 ), Ian_Hilliard( 4.56, 9 )
Aunty_Diluvian( 4.35, 10 ), Mark_Dodel( 4.35, 1 ), Derk_den( 4.25, 2 )
damon( 3.86, 2 ), Bob_Tennent( 3.79, 1 ), Mega_Man( 3.52, 1 )
OK( 3.31, 15 ), B_ichela( 3.25, 3 ), Roy_liar( 3.11, 10 )
Timo_Pirinen( 3.03, 1 ), NoStop( 2.96, 3 ), Mulehead( 2.92, 1 )
Stephen( 2.77, 2 ), rochardleyam( 2.65, 4 )
Doug_Mentohl( 2.59, 25 )
SomeBloke( 2.5, 2 ), Peter_Kai( 2.33, 7 ), Nomen_Nescio( 2.29, 2 )
Au79( 2.25, 3 ), mrafrica_ogo( 2.21, 1 ), Erik( 2.16, 69 )
BearItAll( 2.15, 19 ), Robin_T_Cox( 2.06, 3 ), Nerdwizard( 2.04, 17 )
John_Smith( 2.03, 1 ), sachi_yavatkar( 2.01, 1 ), ml2mst( 2.01, 3 )
pirisisi_gmail( 1.98, 1 ), nessuno_wigner( 1.97, 36 )
John_Bailo( 1.85, 91 ) <-- That's 91 posts, counting cross posts.
No_Spam( 1.83, 3 ), ray( 1.82, 8 )
Shannon_Jacobs( 1.82, 2 ), siju( 1.77, 2 ), croaker( 1.67, 2 )
Geico_Caveman( 1.64, 14 )
Roy_Culley( 1.6, 2 )
Cliff_F( 1.56, 1 ), Lintard_Luser( 1.52, 5 )
DFS( 1.46, 109 ), Tom_Shelton( 1.45, 18 )
Rick( 1.43, 1 ), Jeremy_Fisher( 1.42, 4 ), Jerry_McBride( 1.42, 2 )
Rex_Ballard( 1.41, 7 )
John_Locke( 1.4, 24 ), Chris_B( 1.36, 7 )
bugbuster( 1.33, 5 ), searchingforgod( 1.33, 1 )
John_A_Bailo( 1.31, 7 )
yaogzhan_gmail( 1.25, 1 )
Vladimir( 1.23, 6 ), Ramon_F_Herrera( 1.22, 5 ), Greg_Cox( 1.17, 9 )
amicus_curious( 1.15, 37 ), Rafael( 1.14, 49 ), mario( 1.11, 1 )
Jonathan_Byrd( 1.11, 4 ), dApUnkA( 1.1, 12 ), Kier( 1.08, 43 )
thad05_tux( 1.06, 72 ), Jim_Richardson( 1.05, 68 )
chrisv( 1.02, 99 )
Tim_Smith( 1, 95 ), larry( .988, 4 ), Larry_Qualig( .953, 35 )
AB( .952, 64 ), Bob_Hauck( .944, 6 ), Mike( .935, 4 )
H_omer( .931, 155 ), Phoon_Hencman( .929, 3 ), Linonut( .913, 186 )
spike1_freenet( .909, 30 )
Peter_Köhlmann( .907, 59 )
AZ_Nomad( .907, 4 ), peterwn( .873, 4 ), Hadron_Quark( .857, 188 )
Shubha_Raza( .846, 1 ), cc( .799, 11 ), Dean_G( .782, 10 )
Roy_Schestowitz( .774, 663 ), delanna( .745, 1 ), p5000011( .742, 3 )
Gregory( .727, 1 ), B_Gruff( .726, 3 ), flyer( .717, 106 )
ed( .716, 14 ), William_Poaster( .706, 29 ), Jamie_Hart( .68, 7 )
Navid( .672, 3 ), Kelsey( .612, 12 ), Alexander( .609, 15 )
7( .585, 37 ), owl( .555, 4 ), The_Ghost_In( .505, 100 )
Manny( .497, 14 ), alt( .492, 8 ), Mark_Kent( .492, 30 )
Joerg_Schilling( .487, 2 ), RonB( .467, 2 ), Damian( .466, 6 )
Johan_Lindquist( .465, 1 ), LEE_Sau_Dan( .363, 1 ), Thufir( .351, 9 )
Clogwog( .336, 6 ), Andrew_Smith( .284, 4 ), Jim_Hubbard( .278, 2 )
Richard_Herb( .274, 14 ), Maverick( .273, 39 ), Jeanette( .272, 7 )
Christopher( .182, 14 ), Jeff…Relf( .161, 38 ), Mercellus( .15, 16 )
the_bmac( .146, 4 ), bobandcarole( .114, 4 ), Edwina( .106, 8 )
EZoto( .076, 4 ), Kadaitcha_Man( .052, 10 ), Don_Hills( .045, 4 )
Aardvark( .027, 10 ), Eric_Gisse, Bob_Eager, Bill_Snyder, radha28
Dicerous_gmail, DM_McGowan_II, Paul_Hovnanian, jagannarayan
Nigel_Feltham, Big_Red, Philip, Esmith217_gmail, big_drizzt
Lalita_Manushi, Sienna, Romeo_Maffeo, Pancrazio, Pancrazio_Pace
Dagna_Theissen, fine_itude, Manuel_Leclerc, Dr_Bill, Kardell
alvinj_Example, yatuo_kui_163, spam, Baldylocks, nathanielanumba
birre, Frosty, LR, Moog, Ron_House, Robert, cutebravo, Bruce_Scott_TOK
businessman, Rich_R, jdkaye10_gmail, aashok, Ronnie, clarjon1
nospam_please
.

User: ""

Title: Re: X.EXE's " Power Rating " 02 Jun 2007 09:22:39 AM
Jeff???Relf <Jeff_Relf@yahoo.com> wrote:


thad05_tux( 1.06, 72 ), Jim_Richardson( 1.05, 68 )

Now if only I knew what this 'power rating' meant. At what point
do I gain telekenetic abilities and the power to convert lint into
cheese using only my mind. >:)
Thad
.
User: "=?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=80=A6Relf?="

Title: thad05_tux is handing out more cheese per post than Jim is. 02 Jun 2007 05:36:53 PM
Consider: " thad05_tux( 1.06, 72 ), Jim_Richardson( 1.05, 68 ) ".
You ( Thad ) got 1.06 " chunks of cheese " for every post you made
while Jim got only 1.05 chunks per post.
So, in the next pass ( scoring takes multiple passes ),
you hand out more cheese per post than Jim does.
In the reporting period ( 10 days, 112 participants ) you made 72 posts
but posting to multiple newsgroups counted as multiple posts
and the worst posts were discarded to make room for the latest.
A recent update of Sci.Physics' Power Rating looked like this:
www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/_X_.PNG
www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/Phy_R.TXT
..+.+.+
.


User: "John Bailo"

Title: Re: X.EXE's " Power Rating " 02 Jun 2007 08:30:47 AM
Jeff…Relf wrote:

Congradulations, Mr. 詹光耀,
You made the top of X.EXE's " Power Rating " this week.

The Power Rating uses multiple passes to recursively determine
who got ( and, therefore, could spend ) the most votes.

Voting ( i.e. replying to someone ) is like spending money.
Receiving votes ( i.e. getting replies ) is like earning money.

Great effort. One thing strikes me though -- a missing metric: number of
times a post is "read". I guess you could extrapolate that from replies,
but it's not exactly the same. Doesn't Usenet have view statistics the
way a web server has an access.log?
.
User: "Peter =?UTF-8?B?S8O2aGxtYW5u?="

Title: Re: X.EXE's " Power Rating " 02 Jun 2007 10:50:44 AM
John Bailo wrote:

Jeff…Relf wrote:

Congradulations, Mr. 詹光耀,
You made the top of X.EXE's " Power Rating " this week.

The Power Rating uses multiple passes to recursively determine
who got ( and, therefore, could spend ) the most votes.

Voting ( i.e. replying to someone ) is like spending money.
Receiving votes ( i.e. getting replies ) is like earning money.


Great effort. One thing strikes me though -- a missing metric: number of
times a post is "read". I guess you could extrapolate that from replies,
but it's not exactly the same. Doesn't Usenet have view statistics the
way a web server has an access.log?

And again J Bailo shows off his complete lack of knowledge how things really
work. In your next life you should call yourself Hadron or Erik.
Tell us, Bailo, how do you gather "view statistics" from hundreds, if not
thousands of different news-servers all hosting the same groups?
--
It's not about, 'Where do you want to go today?' It's more like,
'Where am I allowed to go today?'
.
User: "=?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=80=A6Relf?="

Title: Only results ( i.e. a beneficial reply ) count. 03 Jun 2007 09:27:51 PM
It's " What are my best options ? ",
not " Where am I allowed to go today ? ", Mr. Köhlmann.
_ Everyone's _ options suck, trust me. SuSE is no Shangri-La.
This post will be read by you, Bailo,
and one or two extremely bored speed-readers in
" Sci.Physics " and/or " Comp.OS.Linux.Advocacy ".
Besides, only results ( i.e. a beneficial reply ) count.
A " Count of viewers " is not something I'd be interested in.
.

User: "=?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=80=A6Relf?="

Title: Usenet =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=9Cber?= Alles ! 06 Jun 2007 04:36:37 PM
Speaking of Usenet Über Alles !
Check out the first 2 lines of my website:
" www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/ ".
www.Cotse.NET is smart enough to default to " index.htm.TXT "
( but the " index.htm " must be there, in lower case )
and FireFox is smart enough to know it's text/plain. IE7 barfs.
.

User: "=?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=80=A6Relf?="

Title: Usenet =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=9Cber?= Alles ! 06 Jun 2007 04:39:50 PM
[ Reposted to reach John Bailo and Peter Köhlmann in Cola ]
Speaking of Usenet Über Alles !
Check out the first 2 lines of my website:
" www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/ ".
www.Cotse.NET is smart enough to default to " index.htm.TXT "
( but the " index.htm " must be there, in lower case )
and FireFox is smart enough to know it's text/plain. IE7 barfs.
.
User: "John Bailo"

Title: Re: Usenet =?UTF-8?B?w5xiZXI=?= Alles ! 06 Jun 2007 07:41:36 PM
Jeff…Relf wrote:

[ Reposted to reach John Bailo and Peter Köhlmann in Cola ]

Speaking of Usenet Über Alles !
Check out the first 2 lines of my website:
" www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/ ".

www.Cotse.NET is smart enough to default to " index.htm.TXT "
( but the " index.htm " must be there, in lower case )
and FireFox is smart enough to know it's text/plain. IE7 barfs.

I figured out a while back if you use .text as an extension for any web
page, it works for both.
Also, what's cool is that with the .text extension, it will render "as
is" -- so that if I put a tab character on a line, it indents.
.
User: "=?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=80=A6Relf?="

Title: IE7 won't display a .text file. 06 Jun 2007 10:52:32 PM
Thanks for the hint, John Bailo but...
" www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/ " won't default to
" index.htm.text " or " index.text "
and IE7 won't display a .text file; instead, it prompts to save it.
" It's too bad that whole families have to be
torn apart by something as simple as wild dogs. "
- Jack Handey
.


User: "Eric Gisse"

Title: =?iso-8859-1?q?Re:_Usenet_=DCber_Alles_!?= 06 Jun 2007 05:23:59 PM
On Jun 6, 2:39 pm, Jeff...Relf <Jeff_R...@Yahoo.COM> wrote:

[ Reposted to reach John Bailo and Peter K=F6hlmann in Cola ]

Why? They don't care, sci.physics doesn't care. Why keep reposting
*****?
[snip *****]
.
User: "Peter =?UTF-8?B?S8O2aGxtYW5u?="

Title: Re: Usenet =?UTF-8?B?w5xiZXI=?= Alles ! 06 Jun 2007 05:41:18 PM
Eric Gisse wrote:

On Jun 6, 2:39 pm, Jeff...Relf <Jeff_R...@Yahoo.COM> wrote:

[ Reposted to reach John Bailo and Peter Köhlmann in Cola ]


Why? They don't care, sci.physics doesn't care. Why keep reposting
*****?

[snip *****]

Because Relf is a twit? An extremely stupid one, at that.
And he has no idea at all about programming.
Well, he is a windows user. A rather typical one, obviously
--
My other computer is your windows box
.
User: "The Ghost In The Machine"

Title: Re: Usenet =?iso-8859-1?Q?=DCber?= Alles ! 06 Jun 2007 06:25:43 PM
In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Peter Köhlmann
<peter.koehlmann@t-online.de>
wrote
on Thu, 07 Jun 2007 00:41:18 +0200
<f47d69$qa6$01$1@news.t-online.com>:

Eric Gisse wrote:

On Jun 6, 2:39 pm, Jeff...Relf <Jeff_R...@Yahoo.COM> wrote:

[ Reposted to reach John Bailo and Peter Köhlmann in Cola ]


Why? They don't care, sci.physics doesn't care. Why keep reposting
*****?

[snip *****]


Because Relf is a twit? An extremely stupid one, at that.
And he has no idea at all about programming.
Well, he is a windows user. A rather typical one, obviously

Oh, he has an idea all right. Quite a few ideas, actually,
most of them bad. ;-)
A person with no ideas about programming can at least be
taught (in theory) on proper code structuring and such.
--
#191,

Linux. Because life's too short for a buggy OS.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
User: "=?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=80=A6Relf?="

Title: Ghost, here's a softball for ya. 07 Jun 2007 10:40:24 AM
Here's a softball for ya Ghost...
#include <StdIO.H>
typedef wchar_t * LnP ;
#define Str swprintf
#define LoopTil( StopCond ) Ch = 1, P -- ; \
while ( \
Ch \
&& ! ( Ch = * ++ P, Ch2 = ! Ch ? 0 : P [ 1 ], StopCond ) )
// Shows the first three significant figures
// with or without a comma and/or a dot.
// Removes extraneous zeros on the left or right.
LnP Prn( float X ) { static int I ; static wchar_t B_[ 9 ][ 20 ];
LnP B = B_[ I ++ , I %= 9 ];
Str( B, L"%.3f", X ); if ( * B == '0' ) B ++ ;
LnP P = B ; wchar_t Ch, Ch2 ; int FromLeft = 0, Found_Dot = 0 ;
LoopTil( FromLeft >= 3 && Found_Dot ) {
int Dot = Ch == '.' ; Found_Dot |= Dot ;
if ( ! Dot ) FromLeft ++ ; }
main() { LnP P ; // Single Step in Debugger to see results.
P = Prn( 0 ); // . <-- I prefer this over " 0 ".
P = Prn( .0055 ); // .006 ideally, this'd print " 5.5 milli "
P = Prn( 1.1 ); // 1.1
P = Prn( 10 ); // 10
P = Prn( 21.1 ); // 21.1
P = Prn( 3000 ); // 3,000 ideally, this'd print " 3 kilo "
P = Prn( 4000.6789 ); // 4,000 ideally, this'd print " 4 kilo "
}
Prn() is used to produce reports like
X's list of the " Richest/Poorest Players ", to wit:
" www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/Phy_R.TXT ".
Speaking of which, I recently changed the scoring to:
" Virtual_Cash / Post / Day " instead of " Virtual_Cash / Post ".
When scoring, multiple crossposts count as multiple posts
and the Age of a player's set of posts is never less than 1.
Some of X's QuickSorts compare multiple floating point fields, to wit:
" float Cmp() " in " www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/X.CPP ".
.
User: "The Ghost In The Machine"

Title: Re: Ghost, here's a softball for ya. 16 Jun 2007 10:25:59 PM
In sci.physics, Jeff?Relf
<Jeff_Relf@Yahoo.COM>
wrote
on 7 Jun 2007 15:40:24 GMT
<Jeff_Relf_2007_Jun_7__8_40_AW@Cotse.NET>:

Here's a softball for ya Ghost...

#include <StdIO.H>
typedef wchar_t * LnP ;
#define Str swprintf

#define LoopTil( StopCond ) Ch = 1, P -- ; \
while ( \
Ch \
&& ! ( Ch = * ++ P, Ch2 = ! Ch ? 0 : P [ 1 ], StopCond ) )

// Shows the first three significant figures
// with or without a comma and/or a dot.
// Removes extraneous zeros on the left or right.
LnP Prn( float X ) { static int I ; static wchar_t B_[ 9 ][ 20 ];
LnP B = B_[ I ++ , I %= 9 ];
Str( B, L"%.3f", X ); if ( * B == '0' ) B ++ ;
LnP P = B ; wchar_t Ch, Ch2 ; int FromLeft = 0, Found_Dot = 0 ;
LoopTil( FromLeft >= 3 && Found_Dot ) {
int Dot = Ch == '.' ; Found_Dot |= Dot ;
if ( ! Dot ) FromLeft ++ ; }

main() { LnP P ; // Single Step in Debugger to see results.
P = Prn( 0 ); // . <-- I prefer this over " 0 ".
P = Prn( .0055 ); // .006 ideally, this'd print " 5.5 milli "
P = Prn( 1.1 ); // 1.1
P = Prn( 10 ); // 10
P = Prn( 21.1 ); // 21.1
P = Prn( 3000 ); // 3,000 ideally, this'd print " 3 kilo "
P = Prn( 4000.6789 ); // 4,000 ideally, this'd print " 4 kilo "
}

Prn() is used to produce reports like
X's list of the " Richest/Poorest Players ", to wit:
" www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/Phy_R.TXT ".

Speaking of which, I recently changed the scoring to:
" Virtual_Cash / Post / Day " instead of " Virtual_Cash / Post ".

When scoring, multiple crossposts count as multiple posts
and the Age of a player's set of posts is never less than 1.

Some of X's QuickSorts compare multiple floating point fields, to wit:
" float Cmp() " in " www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/X.CPP ".

Bleah. What is this crap? If you're trying to print a number existing
stuff is just fine (fprintf() or sprintf()):
#include <stdio.h>
void printnum(double v)
{
if(v < 0) { v = -v; putchar('-'); }
if(v > 1e9) { printf("%.5f G", v / 1e9); }
else if(v > 1000000) { printf("%.5f M", v / 1e6); }
else if(v > 1000) { printf("%.5f k", v / 1e3); }
else { printf ("%.5f", v); }
}
This isn't quite right but works as a first approximation.
Or one can get fancier and attempt to calculate log(v)/log(10),
which gives the approximate exponent.
--
#191,

Windows Vista. Because it's time to refresh your hardware. Trust us.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
User: "=?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=80=A6Relf?="

Title: How to print " .1 " instead of " 0.10000 ". 16 Jun 2007 11:12:24 PM
The code you ( Mr. Ghost ) showed doesn't remove
extraneous zeros from the left and/or right...
e.g. where you'd print " 234.01200 " my code ( below )
would print just " 234 " and where you'd print " 0.10000 "
my code'd print just " .1 ", etc.
" news:Jeff_Relf_2007_Jun_16__4_31_Pf@Cotse.NET "
explains " _Cola_R.TXT " which uses the Prn() shown below.
I failed to cut and past half the routine, by the way.
From " www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/X.CPP ", here it is in full:
#include <StdIO.H>
typedef wchar_t * LnP ;
#define Str swprintf
#define LoopTil( StopCond ) Ch = 1, P -- ; \
while ( \
Ch \
&& ! ( Ch = * ++ P, Ch2 = ! Ch ? 0 : P [ 1 ], StopCond ) )
// Shows the first three significant figures
// with or without a comma and/or a dot.
// Removes extraneous zeros on the left or right.
LnP Prn( float X ) { static int I ; static wchar_t B_[ 9 ][ 20 ];
LnP B = B_[ I ++ , I %= 9 ];
Str( B, L"%.3f", X ); if ( * B == '0' ) B ++ ;
LnP P = B ; wchar_t Ch, Ch2 ; int FromLeft = 0, Found_Dot = 0 ;
LoopTil( FromLeft >= 3 && Found_Dot ) {
int Dot = Ch == '.' ; Found_Dot |= Dot ;
if ( ! Dot ) FromLeft ++ ; }
while ( -- P > B && P[ 1 ] != '.' && ( * P == '.' || * P == '0' ) );
if ( * ++ P == '.' && P - B > 3 ) { LnP C = P - 3 ;
memmove( C + 1 , C , 3 * Sz_Char ), * C = ',', P ++ ; }
* P = 0 ; return B ; }
main() { LnP P ; // Single Step in Debugger to see results.
P = Prn( 0 ); // . <-- I prefer this over " 0 ".
P = Prn( .0055 ); // .006 ideally, this'd print " 5.5 milli "
P = Prn( 1.1 ); // 1.1
P = Prn( 10 ); // 10
P = Prn( 21.1 ); // 21.1
P = Prn( 3000 ); // 3,000 ideally, this'd print " 3 kilo "
P = Prn( 4000.6789 ); // 4,000 ideally, this'd print " 4 kilo "
}
.
User: "Eric Gisse"

Title: Re: How to print " .1 " instead of " 0.10000 ". 16 Jun 2007 11:16:54 PM
On Jun 16, 8:12 pm, Jeff...Relf <Jeff_R...@Yahoo.COM> wrote:
[snip crap code]
This is SCI.PHYSICS, not alt.shitty.code.
.





User: "Hadron Quark"

Title: Re: Usenet =?utf-8?Q?=C3=9Cber?= Alles ! 07 Jun 2007 03:54:08 AM
Peter Köhlmann <peter.koehlmann@t-online.de> writes:

Eric Gisse wrote:

On Jun 6, 2:39 pm, Jeff...Relf <Jeff_R...@Yahoo.COM> wrote:

[ Reposted to reach John Bailo and Peter Köhlmann in Cola ]


Why? They don't care, sci.physics doesn't care. Why keep reposting
*****?

[snip *****]


Because Relf is a twit? An extremely stupid one, at that.
And he has no idea at all about programming.
Well, he is a windows user. A rather typical one, obviously

Hi Peter! Your signature was rather apt I thought considering that your primary
work machine is a windows one too.
,----
| --
| My other computer is your windows box
`----
For those that don't know, Peter is in fact a Windows User - one of
those that he constantly refers to as "morons and retards".
But on the subject of programming or technical issues (I see you have
criticised someone else for their perceived stupidity) , maybe you could
explain why its "impossible for anyone but Hadron" to create a
contiguous file on a newly formatted file system or why one is unable to
see Anti-Aliasing results in a static screen shot?
Peter is German so spelling "Hypocrite" is probably not too easy.
EN-DE Translations:
===================
hypocrite:
- Heuchler {m}
- Pharisäer {m}
.
User: "Peter =?UTF-8?B?S8O2aGxtYW5u?="

Title: Re: Usenet =?UTF-8?B?w5xiZXI=?= Alles ! 07 Jun 2007 09:05:47 AM
Hadron Quark wrote:

Peter Köhlmann <peter.koehlmann@t-online.de> writes:

Eric Gisse wrote:

On Jun 6, 2:39 pm, Jeff...Relf <Jeff_R...@Yahoo.COM> wrote:

[ Reposted to reach John Bailo and Peter Köhlmann in Cola ]


Why? They don't care, sci.physics doesn't care. Why keep reposting
*****?

[snip *****]


Because Relf is a twit? An extremely stupid one, at that.
And he has no idea at all about programming.
Well, he is a windows user. A rather typical one, obviously


Hi Peter! Your signature was rather apt I thought considering that your
primary work machine is a windows one too.

Nope, Hadron. I have 2 windows machines. *Both* of them are for testing
only.
My work machine is a 64Bit linux machine, and I even do the windows
programming on it (in vmware). There are 2 additional linux computers in
that very room
You should stop assuming that you know anything at all about other people.
You do not, and you are guessing consistently wrong

,----
| --
| My other computer is your windows box
`----

For those that don't know, Peter is in fact a Windows User - one of
those that he constantly refers to as "morons and retards".

You mean *programming* for windows also (as I am not dumb enough to limit my
clientele) and doing nothing else with windows makes me a windows user.
Additionally one like those windows *only* using cretins invading linux
groups.
Gods, are you deluded

But on the subject of programming or technical issues (I see you have
criticised someone else for their perceived stupidity) , maybe you could
explain why its "impossible for anyone but Hadron" to create a
contiguous file on a newly formatted file system

Nope, Hadron, you are *not* getting to move the goalposts.
Nowhere in that swapfile thread was the requirement of a *newly* *formatted*
file system. *Nowhere* Hadron, and you are now trying in vain to introduce
that particular thingy because otherwiese you look exactly the clueless
dimwit you really are.
So yome, Hadron, "true linux advocate", "kernel hacker", "emacs user"
and "swapfile expert", tell us how to set up a *contiguous* swap file on a
system which is *not* newly set up. You know, that swapfile which you can't
set up differently than contiguous, as the tools will not allow it any
other way. *Your* claim, for which you consistently failed to show any
evidence at all. No example, no URL, no nothing
All you have done so far is telling everyone how you stomped your opponents
in that thread (you did not, and you were simply a "me too" to Erik Hadron
(Tim Smith)), yet when then asked *how* to do that exact feat you were so
proudly blubbering about (and so utterly wrong), you remained so eeerily
silent.
Could it be that you know by now fully well that you were so utterly wrong
with your claims then? Like you usually are?
--
Law of Probable Dispersal:
Whatever it is that hits the fan will not be evenly distributed.
.
User: "=?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=80=A6Relf?="

Title: =?UTF-8?Q?K=C3=B6hlmann,?= Can you show me a .EXE file that you wrote ? 08 Jun 2007 05:22:46 PM
Can/will you show me a .EXE that you ( Peter_Köhlmann ) wrote ?
At my website ( www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/ )
I have X.EXE/X.TXT ( case sensitive ), Dif.EXE, Wrap_HTML.EXE,
Win_Strings.EXE . ( e.g. www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/X.TXT )
They run on my PC. ( Win XP )
.
User: "Phineas T Puddleduck"

Title: Re: Köhlmann, Can you show me a .EXE file that you wrote ? 08 Jun 2007 05:27:05 PM
In article <Jeff_Relf_2007_Jun_8__3_22_Pt@Cotse.NET>,
JeffŠRelf <Jeff_Relf@Yahoo.COM> wrote:

Can/will you show me a .EXE that you ( Peter_Köhlmann ) wrote ?

Ah, Relf now tries Exe envy.
--
COOSN-174-07-82116: Official Science Team mascot and alt.astronomy's favourite
poster (from a survey taken of the saucerhead high command).
Official maintainer of the supra-cosmic space fluid pump (Mon and Tues only).
.

User: "Peter =?UTF-8?B?S8O2aGxtYW5u?="

Title: Re: =?UTF-8?B?S8O2aGxtYW5uLA==?= Can you show me a .EXE file that you wrote ? 08 Jun 2007 05:45:06 PM
Jeff…Relf wrote:

Can/will you show me a .EXE that you ( Peter_Köhlmann ) wrote ?

No, I *will* not
Even the idea of comparing my apps to that garbage you write is repulsive
You will win hands down every contest for "worst programmer ever"
--
Avoid reality at all costs.
.
User: "=?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=80=A6Relf?="

Title: Phy.TXT ( X.EXE ) selectively accrues months of history. 09 Jun 2007 12:10:10 AM
I can't compare your ( Peter_Köhlmann's ) code to mine,
so your claims remain invalidated.
Unlike you, I wrote my own newsreader,
" www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/X.EXE ".
The settings are at: " www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/X.TXT ".
Left-Clicking X's " Phy " button updates Phy.TXT and Phy_R.TXT
in InBox mode. ( " Phy " for " Sci.Physics " )
Visual_Studio can undo/redo this update.
InBox mode ranks Players with a heavy bias,
making Sci.Physics act like my In-Box.
Phy.TXT is sorted like Phy_R.TXT .
Middle-Clicking updates _Phy.TXT and _Phy_R.TXT,
the unbiased version of Phy.TXT .
" www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/Phy_R.TXT "
is an example of X's list of the " Richest/Poorest " players.
A " player " is " Rich " if he gets a lot of replies per post
from players who ( recursively ) got a lot of replies per post.
Posts are grouped by player ( a " set " ).
Sets are sorted/ranked by " Virtual_Cash / Post / Day "
or, if equal, by the oldest post in a set.
For scoring, multiple crossposts count as multiple posts
and the Age of a set is floored at 1.
In InBox mode,
the Virtual_Cash that I spend ( i.e. the replies I make )
are boosted to 3 times the heaviest hitter in Sci.Physics .
So, barring other factors, those who I've talked to to recently
usually wind up near the top of Phy.TXT .
For ease of access, recent replies ( 3 days old or less )
are placed at the top, most recent first. ( Catagory_Top )
I never manually delete headers from Phy.TXT,
instead I change the subject line to:
" ..... Some comment. ". The age in days is automtically updated.
I edit the body to taste. ( the original is available elsewhere )
My posts are placed at the bottom of Phy.TXT,
most recent last. ( Catagory_Bottom )
Currently, X is set to retain 4 thousand Catagory_Middle posts,
which is about 11 days for Sci.Physics .
No player takes up more than a third of the 4 thousand;
instead, he's labeled as a " Heavy Hitter "
and his oldest posts are expired.
When Catagory_Middle needs room for the latest posts,
the " Poorest " players are expired first ( Heavy Hitter's excluded );
but players with no post older than 7 days are not expired.
The last line in Phy.TXT contains the last two Message_IDs downloaded
so X can pick up where it left off, irregardless of the server used.
..+.+.+
.
User: "Eric Gisse"

Title: Re: Phy.TXT ( X.EXE ) selectively accrues months of history. 09 Jun 2007 12:54:29 AM
On Jun 8, 9:10 pm, Jeff...Relf <Jeff_R...@Yahoo.COM> wrote:
[snip programming idiocy]
what the ***** does this have to do with either sci.physics or
comp.os.linux.advocacy?
.
User: "Peter =?UTF-8?B?S8O2aGxtYW5u?="

Title: Re: Phy.TXT ( X.EXE ) selectively accrues months of history. 09 Jun 2007 01:14:40 AM
Eric Gisse wrote:

On Jun 8, 9:10 pm, Jeff...Relf <Jeff_R...@Yahoo.COM> wrote:
[snip programming idiocy]

what the ***** does this have to do with either sci.physics or
comp.os.linux.advocacy?

Nothing, naturally.
That idiot twit Relf tries very hard to get some attention
He seems to think by brandishing the worst code ever seen by mankind he gets
it
--
The UNIX Guru`s view of Sex:
unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; umount; sleep
.
User: "=?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=80=A6Relf?="

Title: =?UTF-8?Q?K=C3=B6hlmann?= can't learn X.EXE or Win XP, it seems. 09 Jun 2007 01:54:37 AM
Have you tried X.EXE Köhlmann ? is it too hard for you ?
No wonder you don't like Win XP, you can't learn it.
.
User: "Peter =?UTF-8?B?S8O2aGxtYW5u?="

Title: Relf begging for attention 09 Jun 2007 02:00:12 AM
Jeff…Relf wrote:

Have you tried X.EXE Köhlmann ? is it too hard for you ?
No wonder you don't like Win XP, you can't learn it.

Idiot
--
The Day Microsoft makes something that does not suck is probably
the day they start making vacuum cleaners.
.

User: "Eric Gisse"

Title: =?iso-8859-1?q?Re:_K=F6hlmann_can't_learn_X=2EEXE_or_Win_XP,_it_seems=2E?= 09 Jun 2007 02:04:39 AM
On Jun 8, 10:54 pm, Jeff...Relf <Jeff_R...@Yahoo.COM> wrote:

Have you tried X.EXE K=F6hlmann ? is it too hard for you ?
No wonder you don't like Win XP, you can't learn it.

Does ANYONE use your shitty newsreader other than yourself?
.
User: "Peter =?UTF-8?B?S8O2aGxtYW5u?="

Title: Relf begging for attention 09 Jun 2007 02:27:16 AM
Eric Gisse wrote:

On Jun 8, 10:54 pm, Jeff...Relf <Jeff_R...@Yahoo.COM> wrote:

Have you tried X.EXE Köhlmann ? is it too hard for you ?
No wonder you don't like Win XP, you can't learn it.


Does ANYONE use your shitty newsreader other than yourself?

Nobody would be willing to contaminate their computers with that puke
--
Law of Probable Dispersal:
Whatever it is that hits the fan will not be evenly distributed.
.
User: "=?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=80=A6Relf?="

Title: Sorry =?UTF-8?Q?K=C3=B6hlmann,?= I have code you can use, you don't. 09 Jun 2007 08:54:30 PM
Sorry Köhlmann, I have code you can use, you don't;
so you're in no possition to claim superiority.
Searech for .EXE at my website " www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/ ".
.
User: "Robert"

Title: Re: Sorry =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6hlmann=2C?= I have code you can use, you don't. 10 Jun 2007 12:54:11 AM
Jeff?Relf wrote:

Sorry Köhlmann, I have code you can use, you don't;
so you're in no possition to claim superiority.
Searech for .EXE at my website " www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/ ".

what code?
all you could write is garbage.
take your crap somewhere else.
.


















  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER