"Mathew Orman" <orman@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:bkac3e$792$1@news.onet.pl...
"S. Enterprize Company" <smart1234@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20030917144945.06150.00001428@mb-m10.aol.com...
"S. Enterprize Company" <smart1234@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20030915015915.22893.00000846@mb-m23.aol.com...
You May Ask Why Isn't The Smart Model Published In Scientific
Journals?
Because The Smart Model disproves the QM Model and The Standard
Model.
And
unless you support these models, they don't let you publish. So I
made
my
own
"Smart Science" Journal and published it on Internet. Years ago
people
use
to
say if the Smart Model is correct, explain this or that and so on...
..
All
questions were answered. And now they only ignore The Smart Model. I
guess
they
ran out of questions to ask. It explained basically everything in the
universe,
including the unification of all the fields in the universe.
I have noticed it takes time for people to learn when they are
brainwashed
into believing ONLY The Standard Model and QM. You can't pass college
without
using their models. You can't publish without admitting their models
are
correct. You can't post in moderated science forums without using
ONLY
QM
and
The Standard Model. And everything has to have Quantum this or
Quantun
that
added to it, to be accepted. Even the String Theory uses the QM and
Standard
Model, so naturally it is accepted. Even places where you may need a
job
in
science, you HAVE to use the word quantum this or that.
There is ONLY one correct atomic model in this universe. It is
The
Smart
Model. And I DON'T use the word quantum in anything in the Smart
Model
Theory.
Well I guess I won't be accepted any where in the world of science.
Oh
well I
guess I will just have to wait patiently for scientists to become
intelligent.
Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
If your model explains this:
http://www.io2technology.com/image-temp.htm
Than I would buy it!
Sincerely,
Mathew Orman
www.ultra-faster-than-light.com
www.radio-faster-than-light.com
Looks like a guy that had a video camera.
Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
Sorry they didn't include the link to home page!
Here: http://www.io2technology.com
Sincerely,
Mathew Orman
www.ultra-faster-than-light.com
www.radio-faster-than-light.com
Sam more news:
http://edition.cnn.com/2003/TECH/ptech/09/15/videoscreen.air.reut/index.html
Sincerely,
Mathew Orman
www.ultra-faster-than-light.com
www.radio-faster-than-light.com
.