You May Ask Why Isn't The Smart Model Published In Scientific Journals?



 Science > Physics > You May Ask Why Isn't The Smart Model Published In Scientific Journals?

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "S. Enterprize Company"
Date: 15 Sep 2003 12:59:15 AM
Object: You May Ask Why Isn't The Smart Model Published In Scientific Journals?
You May Ask Why Isn't The Smart Model Published In Scientific Journals?
Because The Smart Model disproves the QM Model and The Standard Model. And
unless you support these models, they don't let you publish. So I made my own
"Smart Science" Journal and published it on Internet. Years ago people use to
say if the Smart Model is correct, explain this or that and so on... . All
questions were answered. And now they only ignore The Smart Model. I guess they
ran out of questions to ask. It explained basically everything in the universe,
including the unification of all the fields in the universe.
I have noticed it takes time for people to learn when they are brainwashed
into believing ONLY The Standard Model and QM. You can't pass college without
using their models. You can't publish without admitting their models are
correct. You can't post in moderated science forums without using ONLY QM and
The Standard Model. And everything has to have Quantum this or Quantun that
added to it, to be accepted. Even the String Theory uses the QM and Standard
Model, so naturally it is accepted. Even places where you may need a job in
science, you HAVE to use the word quantum this or that.
There is ONLY one correct atomic model in this universe. It is The Smart
Model. And I DON'T use the word quantum in anything in the Smart Model Theory.
Well I guess I won't be accepted any where in the world of science. Oh well I
guess I will just have to wait patiently for scientists to become intelligent.
Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
.

User: "Mathew Orman"

Title: Re: You May Ask Why Isn't The Smart Model Published In Scientific Journals? 17 Sep 2003 06:47:40 AM
"S. Enterprize Company" <smart1234@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20030915015915.22893.00000846@mb-m23.aol.com...

You May Ask Why Isn't The Smart Model Published In Scientific Journals?

Because The Smart Model disproves the QM Model and The Standard Model.

And

unless you support these models, they don't let you publish. So I made my

own

"Smart Science" Journal and published it on Internet. Years ago people use

to

say if the Smart Model is correct, explain this or that and so on... . All
questions were answered. And now they only ignore The Smart Model. I guess

they

ran out of questions to ask. It explained basically everything in the

universe,

including the unification of all the fields in the universe.
I have noticed it takes time for people to learn when they are

brainwashed

into believing ONLY The Standard Model and QM. You can't pass college

without

using their models. You can't publish without admitting their models are
correct. You can't post in moderated science forums without using ONLY QM

and

The Standard Model. And everything has to have Quantum this or Quantun

that

added to it, to be accepted. Even the String Theory uses the QM and

Standard

Model, so naturally it is accepted. Even places where you may need a job

in

science, you HAVE to use the word quantum this or that.
There is ONLY one correct atomic model in this universe. It is The

Smart

Model. And I DON'T use the word quantum in anything in the Smart Model

Theory.

Well I guess I won't be accepted any where in the world of science. Oh

well I

guess I will just have to wait patiently for scientists to become

intelligent.





Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/


If your model explains this:
http://www.io2technology.com/image-temp.htm
Than I would buy it!
Sincerely,
Mathew Orman
www.ultra-faster-than-light.com
www.radio-faster-than-light.com
.
User: "S. Enterprize Company"

Title: Re: You May Ask Why Isn't The Smart Model Published In Scientific Journals? 17 Sep 2003 01:49:45 PM

"S. Enterprize Company" <smart1234@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20030915015915.22893.00000846@mb-m23.aol.com...

You May Ask Why Isn't The Smart Model Published In Scientific Journals?

Because The Smart Model disproves the QM Model and The Standard Model.

And

unless you support these models, they don't let you publish. So I made my

own

"Smart Science" Journal and published it on Internet. Years ago people use

to

say if the Smart Model is correct, explain this or that and so on... . All
questions were answered. And now they only ignore The Smart Model. I guess

they

ran out of questions to ask. It explained basically everything in the

universe,

including the unification of all the fields in the universe.
I have noticed it takes time for people to learn when they are

brainwashed

into believing ONLY The Standard Model and QM. You can't pass college

without

using their models. You can't publish without admitting their models are
correct. You can't post in moderated science forums without using ONLY QM

and

The Standard Model. And everything has to have Quantum this or Quantun

that

added to it, to be accepted. Even the String Theory uses the QM and

Standard

Model, so naturally it is accepted. Even places where you may need a job

in

science, you HAVE to use the word quantum this or that.
There is ONLY one correct atomic model in this universe. It is The

Smart

Model. And I DON'T use the word quantum in anything in the Smart Model

Theory.

Well I guess I won't be accepted any where in the world of science. Oh

well I

guess I will just have to wait patiently for scientists to become

intelligent.





Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/



If your model explains this:
http://www.io2technology.com/image-temp.htm
Than I would buy it!

Sincerely,

Mathew Orman
www.ultra-faster-than-light.com
www.radio-faster-than-light.com

Looks like a guy that had a video camera.
Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
.
User: "Mathew Orman"

Title: Re: You May Ask Why Isn't The Smart Model Published In Scientific Journals? 17 Sep 2003 02:19:46 PM
"S. Enterprize Company" <smart1234@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20030917144945.06150.00001428@mb-m10.aol.com...

"S. Enterprize Company" <smart1234@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20030915015915.22893.00000846@mb-m23.aol.com...

You May Ask Why Isn't The Smart Model Published In Scientific Journals?

Because The Smart Model disproves the QM Model and The Standard

Model.

And

unless you support these models, they don't let you publish. So I made

my

own

"Smart Science" Journal and published it on Internet. Years ago people

use

to

say if the Smart Model is correct, explain this or that and so on... .

All

questions were answered. And now they only ignore The Smart Model. I

guess

they

ran out of questions to ask. It explained basically everything in the

universe,

including the unification of all the fields in the universe.
I have noticed it takes time for people to learn when they are

brainwashed

into believing ONLY The Standard Model and QM. You can't pass college

without

using their models. You can't publish without admitting their models

are

correct. You can't post in moderated science forums without using ONLY

QM

and

The Standard Model. And everything has to have Quantum this or Quantun

that

added to it, to be accepted. Even the String Theory uses the QM and

Standard

Model, so naturally it is accepted. Even places where you may need a

job

in

science, you HAVE to use the word quantum this or that.
There is ONLY one correct atomic model in this universe. It is The

Smart

Model. And I DON'T use the word quantum in anything in the Smart Model

Theory.

Well I guess I won't be accepted any where in the world of science. Oh

well I

guess I will just have to wait patiently for scientists to become

intelligent.





Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/



If your model explains this:
http://www.io2technology.com/image-temp.htm
Than I would buy it!

Sincerely,

Mathew Orman
www.ultra-faster-than-light.com
www.radio-faster-than-light.com


Looks like a guy that had a video camera.


Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/


Sorry they didn't include the link to home page!
Here: http://www.io2technology.com
Sincerely,
Mathew Orman
www.ultra-faster-than-light.com
www.radio-faster-than-light.com
.
User: "Mathew Orman"

Title: Re: You May Ask Why Isn't The Smart Model Published In Scientific Journals? 17 Sep 2003 02:22:30 PM
"Mathew Orman" <orman@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:bkac3e$792$1@news.onet.pl...


"S. Enterprize Company" <smart1234@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20030917144945.06150.00001428@mb-m10.aol.com...

"S. Enterprize Company" <smart1234@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20030915015915.22893.00000846@mb-m23.aol.com...

You May Ask Why Isn't The Smart Model Published In Scientific

Journals?


Because The Smart Model disproves the QM Model and The Standard

Model.

And

unless you support these models, they don't let you publish. So I

made

my

own

"Smart Science" Journal and published it on Internet. Years ago

people

use

to

say if the Smart Model is correct, explain this or that and so on...

..

All

questions were answered. And now they only ignore The Smart Model. I

guess

they

ran out of questions to ask. It explained basically everything in the

universe,

including the unification of all the fields in the universe.
I have noticed it takes time for people to learn when they are

brainwashed

into believing ONLY The Standard Model and QM. You can't pass college

without

using their models. You can't publish without admitting their models

are

correct. You can't post in moderated science forums without using

ONLY

QM

and

The Standard Model. And everything has to have Quantum this or

Quantun

that

added to it, to be accepted. Even the String Theory uses the QM and

Standard

Model, so naturally it is accepted. Even places where you may need a

job

in

science, you HAVE to use the word quantum this or that.
There is ONLY one correct atomic model in this universe. It is

The

Smart

Model. And I DON'T use the word quantum in anything in the Smart

Model

Theory.

Well I guess I won't be accepted any where in the world of science.

Oh

well I

guess I will just have to wait patiently for scientists to become

intelligent.





Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/



If your model explains this:
http://www.io2technology.com/image-temp.htm
Than I would buy it!

Sincerely,

Mathew Orman
www.ultra-faster-than-light.com
www.radio-faster-than-light.com


Looks like a guy that had a video camera.


Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/



Sorry they didn't include the link to home page!
Here: http://www.io2technology.com

Sincerely,

Mathew Orman
www.ultra-faster-than-light.com
www.radio-faster-than-light.com



Sam more news:
http://edition.cnn.com/2003/TECH/ptech/09/15/videoscreen.air.reut/index.html
Sincerely,
Mathew Orman
www.ultra-faster-than-light.com
www.radio-faster-than-light.com
.




User: "Starblade Darksquall"

Title: Re: You May Ask Why Isn't The Smart Model Published In Scientific Journals? 17 Sep 2003 06:22:19 AM
(S. Enterprize Company) wrote in message news:<20030915015915.22893.00000846@mb-m23.aol.com>...

You May Ask Why Isn't The Smart Model Published In Scientific Journals?

Because it's one of the dumbest models in the history of science.
Next question!
(...Starblade Riven Darksquall...)
.

User: "Double-A"

Title: Re: You May Ask Why Isn't The Smart Model Published In Scientific Journals? 16 Sep 2003 03:09:40 AM
(S. Enterprize Company) wrote in message news:<20030915015915.22893.00000846@mb-m23.aol.com>...

You May Ask Why Isn't The Smart Model Published In Scientific Journals?

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!
Double-A
.
User: "S. Enterprize Company"

Title: Re: You May Ask Why Isn't The Smart Model Published In Scientific Journals? 16 Sep 2003 06:36:09 AM

smart1234@aol.com (S. Enterprize Company) wrote in message
news:<20030915015915.22893.00000846@mb-m23.aol.com>...

You May Ask Why Isn't The Smart Model Published In Scientific Journals?


Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!


Double-A

That doesn't even sound like laugher, sounds like you're having an
epilepitic seizure... . I'm sorry to hear that. I hope you get better.
Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
.


User: "ghytrfvbnmju7654"

Title: Re: You May Ask Why Isn't The Smart Model Published In Scientific Journals? 16 Sep 2003 04:55:08 PM
(S. Enterprize Company) wrote in message news:<20030915015915.22893.00000846@mb-m23.aol.com>...

You May Ask Why Isn't The Smart Model Published In Scientific Journals?

Who asked?

Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/

Did God tell you to misrepresent the ideas of others so your own
baseless ideas sound more plausible?
.
User: "S. Enterprize Company"

Title: Re: You May Ask Why Isn't The Smart Model Published In Scientific Journals? 16 Sep 2003 11:42:34 PM

smart1234@aol.com (S. Enterprize Company) wrote in message
news:<20030915015915.22893.00000846@mb-m23.aol.com>...

You May Ask Why Isn't The Smart Model Published In Scientific Journals?


Who asked?

I have had people ask me this. And I explained why.


Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/


Did God tell you to misrepresent the ideas of others so your own
baseless ideas sound more plausible?


What? We have debates about theories. And we make corrections to try to
obtain the best scientific evidence and model. What's wrong with that?
If people didn't do this with the Bohr Model QM would still be there.
Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
.
User: "ghytrfvbnmju7654"

Title: Re: You May Ask Why Isn't The Smart Model Published In Scientific Journals? 17 Sep 2003 06:47:54 PM
(S. Enterprize Company) wrote in message news:<20030917004234.16464.00000875@mb-m02.aol.com>...

(S. Enterprize Company) wrote in message
news:<20030915015915.22893.00000846@mb-m23.aol.com>...

You May Ask Why Isn't The Smart Model Published In Scientific Journals?


Who asked?


I have had people ask me this. And I explained why.


Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/


Did God tell you to misrepresent the ideas of others so your own
baseless ideas sound more plausible?



What? We have debates about theories. And we make corrections to try to
obtain the best scientific evidence and model. What's wrong with that?
If people didn't do this with the Bohr Model QM would still be there.

What's wrong is your misrepresenting what other people believe.

Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/

I found no theory at your website. There are pretty pictures,
an introduction which makes several false claims about the
theory of quantum mechanics (saying it can't explain certain
things which it does), some rambling nonsense which means
nothing because it can't be used to calculate anything, and
photocopies of equations out of other people's books to make
gullible people believe that maybe you really can do math.
People like you are interfering with those who really do want
to learn about nature and become confused by your garbage.
.




  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Whare can I ask questions on quantum physics
Ask-a-Friend Marketplaces
BUSTED!!! 100% VIDEO EVIDENCE that WTC7 was controlled demolition!! NEW FOOTAGE!!! Ask yourself WHY havn't I seen this footage before?
Re: Ask a guru a question
Have Astronomy & Space Questions ? Ask The Astronomer !!
Re: Who were the Elohim - Ask John Lear - I wonder if Roger Penrose Knows
particular ask
What's beyond the edge of universe ? Another dimension. Question that should be ask is...
Re: Now I ask you:
A Question to Ask About Temperature.
ask -differential in physics
Re: {ASSD} When people on Usenet feel threatened by your *UNIQUE* personality, they ask you to *CHANGE*
=?iso-8859-1?q?Re:_Good_morning_or_good_evening_depending_upon_your_location._I_want_to_ask_you_the_most_important_question_of_your_life._Your_joy_or_sorrow_for_all_eternity_depends_upon_your_answer._The_question_is:_Are_you_saved=3F_It_is_not_a_ques
=?iso-8859-1?q?Re:_Good_morning_or_good_evening_depending_upon_your_location._I_want_to_ask_you_the_most_important_question_of_your_life._Your_joy_or_sorrow_for_all_eternity_depends_upon_your_answer._The_question_is:_Are_you_saved=3F_It_is_not_a_ques
LYDIA THATCHER AKA DEE DEE 925-968-9763 likes to write bad checks bad checks when you ask the cops and the bank about her they laugh and say she lives on bad checks.Criminal Record, DRUGS 795 #252 WATSON CANYON CT. san ramon,ca 94583450 BOLLINGER CA
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER