Maniac gives beginner player nice little bonus



 Games > Poker > Maniac gives beginner player nice little bonus

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Games > Poker
User: "the big dog"
Date: 31 Jan 2008 08:03:11 AM
Object: Maniac gives beginner player nice little bonus
This post probably qualifies as bragging, so if you don't want to see
it, tune out now. ;)
I'm a beginner, more or less breaking even playing 25c/50c limit poker
online. I jumped into a table tonight which looked good from the
statistics (45% of players seeing the flop... not incredibly loose,
but definitely loose enough I could probably play profitably. I
didn't know the half of it)
turns out theres two fish at the table, one with a seriously large
stack (I'll call this guy moneybags) by the standards of a 25c/50c
table, the other with a standard stack but who appeared to be winning
fairly steadily (I'll call this guy maniac).
When I got pocket tens in my second hand, I bet preflop only to be
raised and re raised by moneybags and maniac. When I called I was
raised one more time. This was the pattern of play right to the river
and I wound up folding to a bet and a raise worried about a straight
or a two pair (no overcards came)
turns out moneybags didn't have anything better than maniacs pair of
sixes.
At this point, I'm wondering about collusion. I'm now pretty sure
they weren't colluding though as if they were, they were really REALLY
bad at it.
So I'm watching for more evidence of collusion and I notice that not
only does maniac almost never fold, he almost never calls either. He
was winning the odd showdown here and there, but mostly he was winning
by sheer bare faced bluff. I think I saw him fold preflop maybe three
times in about 40 hands or so, nearly every action being a raise.
With a solid read on the guy, and fairly clearly no one else has
figured out the guys game (cause they're calling him preflop then
folding to his meaningless post flop raises, sometimes making bets
postflop then folding to his inevitable re raise) I wait for a nice
hand. I get AS QH and call another players bet then re re raise
maniacs re raise. long story short, we hit the cap pre flop, flop 7C
AD 10D and the betting on the flop is a repeat of the preflop action.
There are still 5 people in the pot, 1 player having folded postflop
without adding more money to the pot. Perhaps the other players are a
wakeup to maniac after all, but I think I've got the cards this hand.
In any case, with 6 people hitting the betting cap preflop and 5
hitting the cap postflop, this is a seriously deep pot and I've got
top pair, big kicker. The possibility of a set worries me a little,
but I figure between me and maniac, even a set might fold. I'm not
disappointed.
turn comes 10H.
Another player bets (Based on her betting I'm pretty sure she was
holding a pair of diamonds, drawing to a flush) I call, Maniac raises,
miss flush draw and I both call and two players fold, the paired board
is making me nervous but there's no way I'm folding to "any two cards
maniac" in this hand.
River is 10C
Yikes! I've got tens full of aces but that missing ten has me
worried. Miss flush draw checks, as you would if you were holding an
incomplete flush. I bet, maniac raises (yawn) Miss Flush Draw folds
(no kidding, I think she played this hand better than either me OR
maniac: no shame in chasing a strong draw and there's absolutely no
point in trying to bluff the two wildly betting fools still in the pot
with her) and I call.
the board is: 7c Ad 10d 10h 10c
maniac shows: 7c Ad 10d 10h 10c
That's right. maniac, with 2D 3S plays the board.
Thank you mr maniac, for a monstrous pot by the standards of 25c/50c
limit poker.
now, if only I could get that kind of opponent more often :) I could
make a living at this playing against opponents of this calibre.
Unfortunately, I didn't get another nice hand before maniacs stack got
drained by the other players who by now are very much awake to his
style.
.

User: "da pickle"

Title: Re: Maniac gives beginner player nice little bonus 31 Jan 2008 08:13:16 AM
"the big dog"

This post probably qualifies as bragging, so if you don't want to see
it, tune out now. ;)

You might consider, big dog, moving up. You seem to have this level
mastered.
.

User: "doggystyle"

Title: Re: Maniac gives beginner player nice little bonus 31 Jan 2008 11:38:22 AM
You are a professed "beginner", and you are playing 50 cent limit .. there are
more than 2 fish at the table !!
On Jan 31 2008 8:03 AM, the big dog wrote:

This post probably qualifies as bragging, so if you don't want to see
it, tune out now. ;)

I'm a beginner, more or less breaking even playing 25c/50c limit poker
online. I jumped into a table tonight which looked good from the
statistics (45% of players seeing the flop... not incredibly loose,
but definitely loose enough I could probably play profitably. I
didn't know the half of it)

turns out theres two fish at the table, one with a seriously large
stack (I'll call this guy moneybags) by the standards of a 25c/50c
table, the other with a standard stack but who appeared to be winning
fairly steadily (I'll call this guy maniac).

When I got pocket tens in my second hand, I bet preflop only to be
raised and re raised by moneybags and maniac. When I called I was
raised one more time. This was the pattern of play right to the river
and I wound up folding to a bet and a raise worried about a straight
or a two pair (no overcards came)

turns out moneybags didn't have anything better than maniacs pair of
sixes.

At this point, I'm wondering about collusion. I'm now pretty sure
they weren't colluding though as if they were, they were really REALLY
bad at it.

So I'm watching for more evidence of collusion and I notice that not
only does maniac almost never fold, he almost never calls either. He
was winning the odd showdown here and there, but mostly he was winning
by sheer bare faced bluff. I think I saw him fold preflop maybe three
times in about 40 hands or so, nearly every action being a raise.

With a solid read on the guy, and fairly clearly no one else has
figured out the guys game (cause they're calling him preflop then
folding to his meaningless post flop raises, sometimes making bets
postflop then folding to his inevitable re raise) I wait for a nice
hand. I get AS QH and call another players bet then re re raise
maniacs re raise. long story short, we hit the cap pre flop, flop 7C
AD 10D and the betting on the flop is a repeat of the preflop action.

There are still 5 people in the pot, 1 player having folded postflop
without adding more money to the pot. Perhaps the other players are a
wakeup to maniac after all, but I think I've got the cards this hand.

In any case, with 6 people hitting the betting cap preflop and 5
hitting the cap postflop, this is a seriously deep pot and I've got
top pair, big kicker. The possibility of a set worries me a little,
but I figure between me and maniac, even a set might fold. I'm not
disappointed.

turn comes 10H.

Another player bets (Based on her betting I'm pretty sure she was
holding a pair of diamonds, drawing to a flush) I call, Maniac raises,
miss flush draw and I both call and two players fold, the paired board
is making me nervous but there's no way I'm folding to "any two cards
maniac" in this hand.

River is 10C

Yikes! I've got tens full of aces but that missing ten has me
worried. Miss flush draw checks, as you would if you were holding an
incomplete flush. I bet, maniac raises (yawn) Miss Flush Draw folds
(no kidding, I think she played this hand better than either me OR
maniac: no shame in chasing a strong draw and there's absolutely no
point in trying to bluff the two wildly betting fools still in the pot
with her) and I call.

the board is: 7c Ad 10d 10h 10c
maniac shows: 7c Ad 10d 10h 10c
That's right. maniac, with 2D 3S plays the board.

Thank you mr maniac, for a monstrous pot by the standards of 25c/50c
limit poker.

now, if only I could get that kind of opponent more often :) I could
make a living at this playing against opponents of this calibre.
Unfortunately, I didn't get another nice hand before maniacs stack got
drained by the other players who by now are very much awake to his
style.

_______________________________________________________________
Your Online Poker Community - http://www.recpoker.com
.
User: "The Reamer"

Title: Re: Maniac gives beginner player nice little bonus 31 Jan 2008 12:29:35 PM
The best strategy vs a maniac is to just call his bets if you think you have him
beaten with modest holdings - Top pair, middle pair, etc. Now if you have the
goods - top 2 pair or better, jam him.
I am a big believer in tight aggressive play, but loose passive isn't a bad
option vs the maniac.
Maniacs live for action. They will lose big money at the table, but if they get
lucky, they can lay a major hurting on you, and drive you into a chip spewing
tilt on top of it when his 6-4o that he capped with hits hard. It's all about
ego, domination, and action. They like to play "chicken" and get you to flinch
first. They are adrenaline junkies.
The problem with maniacs is, sometimes they hit a big hand, and you never know
what they are holding. The pot you won is pretty typical. I've lost some huge
pots to maniacs when I've had TPTK. A classic example is capping it preflop with
AK vs his A4, and he makes 2 pair on the flop. You also need to be alert for
another player in the hand. Sometimes you get caught between the maniac and
someone with a monster.
The way to take advantage of them is to just call if you believe your hand is
better - marginally - middle or better. Raising them only pours fuel on the
fire. If you just call them down with top pair/middle pair once once or twice,
it will usually cool them off. Calling genuinely drives them crazy. Remember,
head to head , he will miss the flop 2/3 of the time.
IMO, I prefer to be 2-3 seats to the left of the maniac. It gives a little bit
of a buffer. Being to the immediate left of the maniac is OK, but you can get
hurt when someone behind you wakes up with a monster. Having a player or 2 in
between can help prevent that from happening.
The way to think of limit tables with maniacs is that essentially, the blinds
are doubled, and you are to some extent playing at higher stakes. The pots, on
average will be 50-100% higher than a typical table. I would tend to tighten up
in early position, and loosen up in LP. Again, it's not the maniac I worry about
so much as a solid player waking up with a monster.
It takes about 45 minutes at a table to find out whether a player is a maniac or
a tight aggressive player on a rush. I've rushed to judgement a few times and
paid for it.
On Jan 31 2008 12:38 PM, doggystyle wrote:

You are a professed "beginner", and you are playing 50 cent limit .. there are
more than 2 fish at the table !!

On Jan 31 2008 8:03 AM, the big dog wrote:

This post probably qualifies as bragging, so if you don't want to see
it, tune out now. ;)

I'm a beginner, more or less breaking even playing 25c/50c limit poker
online. I jumped into a table tonight which looked good from the
statistics (45% of players seeing the flop... not incredibly loose,
but definitely loose enough I could probably play profitably. I
didn't know the half of it)

turns out theres two fish at the table, one with a seriously large
stack (I'll call this guy moneybags) by the standards of a 25c/50c
table, the other with a standard stack but who appeared to be winning
fairly steadily (I'll call this guy maniac).

When I got pocket tens in my second hand, I bet preflop only to be
raised and re raised by moneybags and maniac. When I called I was
raised one more time. This was the pattern of play right to the river
and I wound up folding to a bet and a raise worried about a straight
or a two pair (no overcards came)

turns out moneybags didn't have anything better than maniacs pair of
sixes.

At this point, I'm wondering about collusion. I'm now pretty sure
they weren't colluding though as if they were, they were really REALLY
bad at it.

So I'm watching for more evidence of collusion and I notice that not
only does maniac almost never fold, he almost never calls either. He
was winning the odd showdown here and there, but mostly he was winning
by sheer bare faced bluff. I think I saw him fold preflop maybe three
times in about 40 hands or so, nearly every action being a raise.

With a solid read on the guy, and fairly clearly no one else has
figured out the guys game (cause they're calling him preflop then
folding to his meaningless post flop raises, sometimes making bets
postflop then folding to his inevitable re raise) I wait for a nice
hand. I get AS QH and call another players bet then re re raise
maniacs re raise. long story short, we hit the cap pre flop, flop 7C
AD 10D and the betting on the flop is a repeat of the preflop action.

There are still 5 people in the pot, 1 player having folded postflop
without adding more money to the pot. Perhaps the other players are a
wakeup to maniac after all, but I think I've got the cards this hand.

In any case, with 6 people hitting the betting cap preflop and 5
hitting the cap postflop, this is a seriously deep pot and I've got
top pair, big kicker. The possibility of a set worries me a little,
but I figure between me and maniac, even a set might fold. I'm not
disappointed.

turn comes 10H.

Another player bets (Based on her betting I'm pretty sure she was
holding a pair of diamonds, drawing to a flush) I call, Maniac raises,
miss flush draw and I both call and two players fold, the paired board
is making me nervous but there's no way I'm folding to "any two cards
maniac" in this hand.

River is 10C

Yikes! I've got tens full of aces but that missing ten has me
worried. Miss flush draw checks, as you would if you were holding an
incomplete flush. I bet, maniac raises (yawn) Miss Flush Draw folds
(no kidding, I think she played this hand better than either me OR
maniac: no shame in chasing a strong draw and there's absolutely no
point in trying to bluff the two wildly betting fools still in the pot
with her) and I call.

the board is: 7c Ad 10d 10h 10c
maniac shows: 7c Ad 10d 10h 10c
That's right. maniac, with 2D 3S plays the board.

Thank you mr maniac, for a monstrous pot by the standards of 25c/50c
limit poker.

now, if only I could get that kind of opponent more often :) I could
make a living at this playing against opponents of this calibre.
Unfortunately, I didn't get another nice hand before maniacs stack got
drained by the other players who by now are very much awake to his
style.



_______________________________________________________________
* New Release: RecPoker.com v2.2 - http://www.recpoker.com
.


User: "455"

Title: Re: Maniac gives beginner player nice little bonus 31 Jan 2008 04:20:53 PM
how can you really classify players at a 25 CENT table?


turns out theres two fish at the table, one with a seriously large
stack (I'll call this guy moneybags) by the standards of a 25c/50c

.
User: "the big dog"

Title: Re: Maniac gives beginner player nice little bonus 01 Feb 2008 02:14:38 AM
On Feb 1, 9:20 am, "455" <anonym...@hotmail.com> wrote:

how can you really classify players at a 25 CENT table?



turns out theres two fish at the table, one with a seriously large
stack (I'll call this guy moneybags) by the standards of a 25c/50c

I watched this clown(the guy I called maniac) for 40 hands (turns out
what I initially thought might be collusion was just two maniacs
trying to bluff each other) and he raised at literally every
opportunity, regardless of what he was holding. The guy I called
moneybags wasn't quite as predictable, but I got the definite
impression that he would play and raise with, any two cards.
.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.6086     pg.4672     pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER