British see fundamental fissure in American politics; right wing extremists vs. Liberty



 Politics > Politics-Misc > British see fundamental fissure in American politics; right wing extremists vs. Liberty

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Politics > Politics-Misc
User: "PennsylvaniaFarmer"
Date: 06 Jul 2003 11:21:45 AM
Object: British see fundamental fissure in American politics; right wing extremists vs. Liberty
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_00A4_01C343B9.17464DC0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
America is a harsher place=20
Hillary Clinton makes a compelling case for why Britain shouldn't treat =
with American conservatism=20
Will Hutton
Sunday July 6, 2003
The Observer=20
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/worldview/story/0,11581,992312,00.html
The British are gradually being educated about America. President Bush's =
decision to try six suspected al-Qaeda terrorists, including two =
Britons, in a secret military tribunal that could lead to their =
execution is so obviously self-defeating that both Right and Left are =
united in their criticism.=20
Surely the US realises that it must be on the side of law even against =
terrorism; surely it must see that if convictions and executions follow =
from a process in which the military is judge, prosecution and jury, =
every mad criticism of it will seem justified. Even the doe-eyed =
innocents of the Government are beginning to realise what they're up =
against.=20
America is poorly understood in Britain. Above all, we don't understand =
the American Right - its roots, reflex reactions, ambitions and the =
profundity of its ideology. It's been a commonplace for too long that =
Republicans and Democrats are essentially the same and that their =
differences are minuscule. It is a view that has even been held in parts =
of the US, though with ever decreasing conviction as events unfold.=20
The truth is that there is a fundamental fissure. There is the =
pro-federal tradition - a golden thread that runs from the founding =
fathers, through Lincoln, the Roosevelts, Kennedy and Johnson to Bill =
Clinton. And there is the anti-federal tradition that crystallised in =
the south during the American Civil War and which runs as an equally =
golden thread through the key twentieth-century figures of the American =
Right - William Taft, Barry Goldwater, Ronald Reagan and now George =
Bush.=20
It is the quintessential American conflict, fuelled by visceral emotions =
over race, sexuality and gender. On the one hand, there is a belief in =
the power of government and rationality to improve the lot of all =
Americans. On the other, there is a belief in the rawest system of =
individual penalties and rewards to create a conservative concept of =
good Christian character - vast incomes for the entrepreneurial, vicious =
punishment for the antisocial. Nothing should be allowed to inhibit the =
prosecution of these allegedly natural instincts.=20
This is the yeast of American politics, to which 11 September has given =
a new twist, and against which Guantanamo Bay will play out. If Bush =
gives ground on this, he will have compromised the very essence of what =
it means to be an American conservative, a political mistake as epic as =
his father's reversal on his famous promise not to increase taxes.=20
It is also, as I watched Bill and Hillary Clinton expertly work =
Kensington Palace's Orangery at her book launch in London last week, why =
these two trigger so much enmity from the US Right. For all their =
evident flaws, they remain the best, most charismatic exponents of the =
federalist, pro-government tradition in the US. They find the words best =
to express it and can build the coalitions to make it happen even in an =
US not beset by recession or war. And they can do it even when the =
Conservatives hold so many aces - from cash to pure mendacity.=20
As you read Hillary Clinton's account of her years in the White House in =
her autobiography, Living History , you get a handle on why she didn't =
leave her husband, despite betrayal and what she describes as her =
singular loneliness as the Lewinsky affair broke. It was too big a prize =
to offer her elemental enemies and the tradition which she represents =
was too important to her.=20
The whole apparatus of the Starr inquiry, which tried to capitalise on =
Bill Clinton's infidelity, turning it into charges of criminality and =
attempted impeachment, had its roots in what she herself described a =
vast right-wing conspiracy. It is that same network and culture that is =
now animating American foreign policy and the choices made in =
Afghanistan, Iraq and Guantanamo Bay.=20
It is the other big book just published on Clinton's presidency - Sidney =
Blumenthal's The Clinton Wars - that gets to the heart of this network =
and tries to locate the Clinton presidency in the pantheon of the US's =
progressive tradition. I defy anybody to finish it and not be per suaded =
that Blumenthal has a powerful case; it is a primer on the politics, =
networks and processes of the American Right. I would like to make it a =
compulsory part of Messrs Blair, Straw, Hoon and Blunkett's reading list =
this summer. If they knew what they were dealing with, they would be =
more wary about signing the one-sided extradition treaty with the US - =
America can extradite our nationals with no due legal process in Britain =
but not the other way round.=20
And surely Geoff Hoon would not be so ready to reform the command =
structures of our armed forces so they can be more easily commanded by =
American officers, as he recently proposed. This would be an =
extraordinary proposal in normal times; in today's context, it is barely =
credible. Britain has to keep some reserve in our association with =
conservative America.=20
Blumenthal's account is no snow job. He is clear-sighted and harsh about =
Clinton's political misjudgments, whether over health care or gays in =
the military. Nor does he forgive Clinton's sexual adventures. But his =
blow-by-blow account of how the Right exploited any innuendo, regardless =
of the truth, to undermine a Democratic presidency is singularly =
revealing, as is the uncritical complicity of too much of the American =
media. America's best lawyers spent $60 million to uncover not a shred =
of bad practice in the Whitewater affair.=20
Starr, as Blumenthal lethally reveals, was no impartial prosecutor but a =
conservative partisan. In Britain, we have no notion of politics =
prosecuted like this.=20
While it may be true that the Clinton legacy, for all Blumenthal's =
efforts at talking it up, has not proved very enduring and was =
contingent on an economic boom that was only partly of Clinton's making, =
none the less there were substantial social gains in what has suddenly =
become a very cold climate. Clinton, we can be sure, would not be =
presiding over military tribunals in Guantanamo Bay. It's only when you =
witness the American Right in its full majesty that you recognise =
Clinton's achievement.=20
The reception of the two books has been warm, warmer than either author =
might have expected. Blumenthal, in particular, has triggered an urgent =
debate about why the American media treated what we now know as lies as =
reportable facts or 'allegations', putting his critics on the defensive. =
Meanwhile, Howard Dean has emerged as front runner for the Democratic =
nomination as an unapologetic critic of Iraq.=20
'The Clinton Wars' are transmuting into a wider and bitter conflict over =
how America should be governed and its relationship with the rest of the =
world. Britain should be neutral in this internal battle. The calamity =
of our recent diplomacy is that we find ourselves on the side of the =
conservatives, a mistake that will cost us dear.=20
_______________________________________________
We see once again, the Bush war machine has transmuted American politics =
into an "Us" vs. "Them" juggernaut.
------=_NextPart_000_00A4_01C343B9.17464DC0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dwindows-1252">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1170" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"CenturyOldst BT"><STRONG><FONT face=3DArial =
size=3D5>America is a=20
harsher place</FONT></STRONG> <BR><BR><FONT =
face=3Darial,helvetica,sans-serif=20
size=3D3>Hillary Clinton makes a compelling case for why Britain =
shouldn't treat=20
with American conservatism</FONT> <BR><BR><FONT =
face=3DGeneva,Arial,sans-serif=20
size=3D2><B>Will Hutton<BR>Sunday July 6, 2003<BR><A=20
href=3D"http://www.observer.co.uk/">The Observer</A></B> =
<BR><BR></FONT><FONT=20
face=3DGeneva,Arial,sans-serif size=3D2></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"CenturyOldst BT"><FONT face=3DGeneva,Arial,sans-serif =
size=3D2><A=20
href=3D"http://observer.guardian.co.uk/worldview/story/0,11581,992312,00.=
html">http://observer.guardian.co.uk/worldview/story/0,11581,992312,00.ht=
ml</A></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"CenturyOldst BT"></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"CenturyOldst BT"><FONT face=3DGeneva,Arial,sans-serif =
size=3D2>The=20
British are gradually being educated about America. President Bush's =
decision to=20
try six suspected al-Qaeda terrorists, including two Britons, in a =
secret=20
military tribunal that could lead to their execution is so obviously=20
self-defeating that both Right and Left are united in their criticism. =
</DIV>
<P>Surely the US realises that it must be on the side of law even =
against=20
terrorism; surely it must see that if convictions and executions follow =
from a=20
process in which the military is judge, prosecution and jury, every mad=20
criticism of it will seem justified. Even the doe-eyed innocents of the=20
Government are beginning to realise what they're up against.=20
<P>America is poorly understood in Britain. Above all, we don't =
understand the=20
American Right - its roots, reflex reactions, ambitions and the =
profundity of=20
its ideology. It's been a commonplace for too long that Republicans and=20
Democrats are essentially the same and that their differences are =
minuscule. It=20
is a view that has even been held in parts of the US, though with ever=20
decreasing conviction as events unfold.=20
<P>The truth is that there is a fundamental fissure. There is the =
pro-federal=20
tradition - a golden thread that runs from the founding fathers, through =
Lincoln, the Roosevelts, Kennedy and Johnson to Bill Clinton. And there =
is the=20
anti-federal tradition that crystallised in the south during the =
American Civil=20
War and which runs as an equally golden thread through the key =
twentieth-century=20
figures of the American Right - William Taft, Barry Goldwater, Ronald =
Reagan and=20
now George Bush.=20
<P>It is the quintessential American conflict, fuelled by visceral =
emotions over=20
race, sexuality and gender. On the one hand, there is a belief in the =
power of=20
government and rationality to improve the lot of all Americans. On the =
other,=20
there is a belief in the rawest system of individual penalties and =
rewards to=20
create a conservative concept of good Christian character - vast incomes =
for the=20
entrepreneurial, vicious punishment for the antisocial. Nothing should =
be=20
allowed to inhibit the prosecution of these allegedly natural instincts. =
<P>This is the yeast of American politics, to which 11 September has =
given a new=20
twist, and against which Guantanamo Bay will play out. If Bush gives =
ground on=20
this, he will have compromised the very essence of what it means to be =
an=20
American conservative, a political mistake as epic as his father's =
reversal on=20
his famous promise not to increase taxes.=20
<P>It is also, as I watched Bill and Hillary Clinton expertly work =
Kensington=20
Palace's Orangery at her book launch in London last week, why these two =
trigger=20
so much enmity from the US Right. For all their evident flaws, they =
remain the=20
best, most charismatic exponents of the federalist, pro-government =
tradition in=20
the US. They find the words best to express it and can build the =
coalitions to=20
make it happen even in an US not beset by recession or war. And they can =
do it=20
even when the Conservatives hold so many aces - from cash to pure =
mendacity.=20
<P>As you read Hillary Clinton's account of her years in the White House =
in her=20
autobiography, Living History , you get a handle on why she didn't leave =
her=20
husband, despite betrayal and what she describes as her singular =
loneliness as=20
the Lewinsky affair broke. It was too big a prize to offer her elemental =
enemies=20
and the tradition which she represents was too important to her.=20
<P>The whole apparatus of the Starr inquiry, which tried to capitalise =
on Bill=20
Clinton's infidelity, turning it into charges of criminality and =
attempted=20
impeachment, had its roots in what she herself described a vast =
right-wing=20
conspiracy. It is that same network and culture that is now animating =
American=20
foreign policy and the choices made in Afghanistan, Iraq and Guantanamo =
Bay.=20
<P>It is the other big book just published on Clinton's presidency - =
Sidney=20
Blumenthal's The Clinton Wars - that gets to the heart of this network =
and tries=20
to locate the Clinton presidency in the pantheon of the US's progressive =
tradition. I defy anybody to finish it and not be per suaded that =
Blumenthal has=20
a powerful case; it is a primer on the politics, networks and processes =
of the=20
American Right. I would like to make it a compulsory part of Messrs =
Blair,=20
Straw, Hoon and Blunkett's reading list this summer. If they knew what =
they were=20
dealing with, they would be more wary about signing the one-sided =
extradition=20
treaty with the US - America can extradite our nationals with no due =
legal=20
process in Britain but not the other way round.=20
<P>And surely Geoff Hoon would not be so ready to reform the command =
structures=20
of our armed forces so they can be more easily commanded by American =
officers,=20
as he recently proposed. This would be an extraordinary proposal in =
normal=20
times; in today's context, it is barely credible. Britain has to keep =
some=20
reserve in our association with conservative America.=20
<P>Blumenthal's account is no snow job. He is clear-sighted and harsh =
about=20
Clinton's political misjudgments, whether over health care or gays in =
the=20
military. Nor does he forgive Clinton's sexual adventures. But his =
blow-by-blow=20
account of how the Right exploited any innuendo, regardless of the =
truth, to=20
undermine a Democratic presidency is singularly revealing, as is the =
uncritical=20
complicity of too much of the American media. America's best lawyers =
spent $60=20
million to uncover not a shred of bad practice in the Whitewater affair. =
<P>Starr, as Blumenthal lethally reveals, was no impartial prosecutor =
but a=20
conservative partisan. In Britain, we have no notion of politics =
prosecuted like=20
this.=20
<P>While it may be true that the Clinton legacy, for all Blumenthal's =
efforts at=20
talking it up, has not proved very enduring and was contingent on an =
economic=20
boom that was only partly of Clinton's making, none the less there were=20
substantial social gains in what has suddenly become a very cold =
climate.=20
Clinton, we can be sure, would not be presiding over military tribunals =
in=20
Guantanamo Bay. It's only when you witness the American Right in its =
full=20
majesty that you recognise Clinton's achievement.=20
<P>The reception of the two books has been warm, warmer than either =
author might=20
have expected. Blumenthal, in particular, has triggered an urgent debate =
about=20
why the American media treated what we now know as lies as reportable =
facts or=20
'allegations', putting his critics on the defensive. Meanwhile, Howard =
Dean has=20
emerged as front runner for the Democratic nomination as an unapologetic =
critic=20
of Iraq.=20
<P>'The Clinton Wars' are transmuting into a wider and bitter conflict =
over how=20
America should be governed and its relationship with the rest of the =
world.=20
Britain should be neutral in this internal battle. The calamity of our =
recent=20
diplomacy is that we find ourselves on the side of the conservatives, a =
mistake=20
that will cost us dear. </P>
<P>_______________________________________________</P>
<P>We see once again, the Bush war machine has transmuted American =
politics into=20
an "Us" vs. "Them" juggernaut.</FONT></P></FONT></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_00A4_01C343B9.17464DC0--
.


  Page 1 of 1


Related Articles
Ah-nuld accuser threatens to sue right wing sleaze Joe Scarborough & MSNBC
The Right Wing: When in Doubt, Play the McCarthy Card
Another right wing myth has a reality check problem
I just bought gas in Blaine Washington. Are right wing Americans all this stupid?
the right-wing draft-dodgers
Re: Remember How The Kerry's Left Wing Pals Spat On Vietnam Vets? Kerry's Hero JFK Started The Vietnam War (Re: More On Jane Fonda And The Anti War Movement
Right Wing Justifies Torture as "Blowing Off Steam"
Re: Where are the left-wing domestic terrorists?
Re: Right wing ***** heads go ape
Re: The vomit literally oozes out of the right wing sewer.
Re: was there a vast 'left-wing conspiracy' back in 92?
Right Wing Chooses Politics Over Safety
Re: Right Wing group slams AARP
Right-wing threats against judges
Right-wing psychotic murderers in our midst
 

NEWER

pg.7925     pg.6086     pg.4672     pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER