Re : : Bush Help for Workers: 6 million may still lose OT pay



 Politics > Politics-Misc > Re : : Bush Help for Workers: 6 million may still lose OT pay

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Politics > Politics-Misc
User: ""
Date: 15 Jul 2004 07:13:31 PM
Object: Re : : Bush Help for Workers: 6 million may still lose OT pay


From CNN, 7/14/04:
http://money.cnn.com/2004/07/14/news/economy/overtime/index.htm?cnn=yes

6 million may still lose OT pay: study

Labor-backed group says new revisions to work rules will still mean
lost overtime for millions.

NEW YORK (CNN/Money) -

Revised changes to overtime rules proposed by the Bush administration
will still fail to protect overtime pay for 6 million workers,
according to a new study.

The Bush Administration issued proposed changes to overtime rules last
year, but then revised them in March after criticism from some labor
groups.

The original proposal would have stripped overtime protection for 8
million workers, according to the Economic Policy Institute (EPI),
which studies issues affecting middle- and lower-income workers and
receives funding from some labor groups.

But the revisions would still strip OT pay for about 6 million
workers, EPI said in a study released Tuesday.

_____________________________________________________

Another nail in Bush's coffin.

Harry

.

User: "William Boyd"

Title: Re: Re : : Bush Help for Workers: 6 million may still lose OT pay 15 Jul 2004 07:37:03 PM
Democrats & Social Security
Really Something!! George H.
SOCIAL SECURITY:
Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social Security (FICA)
Program. He promised:
1.) That participation in the Program would be
completely voluntary,
2.) That the participants would only have to pay
1% of the first $1,400 of their annual incomes into
the Program,
3.) That the money the participants elected to
put into the Program would be deductible from their
income for tax purposes each year,
4.) That the money the participants put into the
independent "Trust Fund" rather than into the
General operating fund, and therefore, would only be
used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program,
and no other Government program, and,
5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees
would never be taxed as income.
Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and
are now receiving a Social Security check every
month -- and then finding that we are getting taxed
on 85% of the money we paid to the Federal
government to "put away," you may be interested in
the following:
Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from
the independent "Trust" fund and put it into the
General fund so that Congress could spend it?
A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the
Democratically-controlled House and Senate.
Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax
deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?
A: The Democratic Party.
Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social
Security annuities?
A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the
"tie-breaking" deciding vote as President of the
Senate, while he was Vice President of the U.S.
Q: Which Political Party decided to start giving
annuity payments to immigrants?
A: That's right! Jimmy Carter and the Democratic
Party. Immigrants moved into this country, and at
age 65, began to receive SSI Social Security
payments! The Democratic Party gave these payments
to them, even though they never paid a dime into it!
Then, after doing all this lying and thieving and
violation of the original contract (FICA), the
Democrats turn around and tell you that the
Republicans want to take your Social Security away!
And the worst part about it is, uninformed citizens
believe it!
Perhaps we are asking the wrong questions during
this 2004 election year!
grub@internet.charitydays.uk.co wrote:



From CNN, 7/14/04:
http://money.cnn.com/2004/07/14/news/economy/overtime/index.htm?cnn=yes

6 million may still lose OT pay: study

Labor-backed group says new revisions to work rules will still mean
lost overtime for millions.

NEW YORK (CNN/Money) -

Revised changes to overtime rules proposed by the Bush administration
will still fail to protect overtime pay for 6 million workers,
according to a new study.

The Bush Administration issued proposed changes to overtime rules last
year, but then revised them in March after criticism from some labor
groups.

The original proposal would have stripped overtime protection for 8
million workers, according to the Economic Policy Institute (EPI),
which studies issues affecting middle- and lower-income workers and
receives funding from some labor groups.

But the revisions would still strip OT pay for about 6 million
workers, EPI said in a study released Tuesday.

_____________________________________________________

Another nail in Bush's coffin.

Harry

.
User: "Gandalf Grey"

Title: Re: Re : : Bush Help for Workers: 6 million may still lose OT pay 15 Jul 2004 08:18:03 PM
"William Boyd" <william@cowboy.net> wrote in message
news:40F7232F.2B3D33D8@cowboy.net...

Democrats & Social Security

Republicans and Tax Increases.
Largest Tax Increase in History
Wall Street Journal, October 26, 1994
The Reagan-Dole Tax bill in 1982 was actually the largest ever "both in 1993
adjusted dollars and as a percentage of the overall economy."
So much for the Repugnican charges against Clinton and the dems.
.


User: "Larry Hewitt"

Title: Re: : Bush Help for Workers: 6 million may still lose OT pay 15 Jul 2004 09:43:07 PM
<grub@internet.charitydays.uk.co> wrote in message
news:bc7ef050ae9si6tbr4bcvfjgkp744au732@4ax.com...


From CNN, 7/14/04:
http://money.cnn.com/2004/07/14/news/economy/overtime/index.htm?cnn=yes

6 million may still lose OT pay: study

Labor-backed group says new revisions to work rules will still mean
lost overtime for millions.

NEW YORK (CNN/Money) -

Revised changes to overtime rules proposed by the Bush administration
will still fail to protect overtime pay for 6 million workers,
according to a new study.

The Bush Administration issued proposed changes to overtime rules last
year, but then revised them in March after criticism from some labor
groups.

The original proposal would have stripped overtime protection for 8
million workers, according to the Economic Policy Institute (EPI),
which studies issues affecting middle- and lower-income workers and
receives funding from some labor groups.

But the revisions would still strip OT pay for about 6 million
workers, EPI said in a study released Tuesday.

This was the big national news item on local tv tonight. Seems a lot of
people here in South Carolina are going to be affected. They had interviews
with some people who were going to lose 15% of their pay. They were not
happy with Bush.
Kerry may win South Carolina after all.
Larry

_____________________________________________________

Another nail in Bush's coffin.

Harry


.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Media still censoring story of Ohio election workers who rigged 2004 prez election
Zanon Workers Still Waiting for Security
Lucent fires 12,500, but still pays Dividends - Workers call for Strike
Right-wing still playing their classic li'l dirty tricks games. They're sooooo pathetic.
Re: 62 Per Cent Of Americans Still Think That The Iraqi Invasion Was Right
What Kind of Sicko Makes a Movie About Himself While He's Still in Office?
More Bad News for Right Wing: Jobs Still Missing from Economic Recovery
"If you don't build it; they still will come."
Legal System Still Setting Terrorists Free
Iraqis Fail to Regain Control of Oil Revenue - Thievery Continues,Sovereignty Still Elusive
Re: Lt. George W. Bush: Still AWOL | Re: Kerry's Cambodia question
GENERAL: BIN LADEN STILL ISSUING ORDERS, SOMEONE PLEASE TELL BUSH................
Bush Still Stands by Mission Accomplished Blunder
Vietnam vets still waiting for Kerry's apology.
Is America still a free country?
 

NEWER

pg.7925     pg.6086     pg.4672     pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER