| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"DDB" |
| Date: |
03 Jan 2004 07:21:51 PM |
| Object: |
A Bush v.s. Clinton comparison |
Some thoughts to ponder?
1. It is a proven fact that Clinton left the country to avoid the draft ( he
was a draft dodger) and it is pure fiction that Bush was AWOL, the fact is
you can not be AWOL in the National Guard nor the Reserve unless your
company has been called to active duty and you fail to show up. Since no one
has ever made the claim that Bush failed to show for a recall to active duty
then this must ahve been one of those liberal lying wet dreams we discussed
earlier. Since his election thousands of lying liberals have repeated this
lie in the hopes that if repeated enough it will some how become truth, well
its been three years and it si still a lie. So from a military background
stand point Bush wins this one!
2. Democrats now are claiming that Bush was at fault over 9/11, the facts
paint a different picture though. The first world trade center attack was
conducted in 1993 shortly after Clinton took office for his first 4 year
term. Since that time it has been know that Al Qaeda launched those attacks
under Bin Laden's leadership and many, many other terrorist attacks between
then and the end of clintons administration occured and he did nothing. A
number of nations offered to hand Osama over to him no less than three times
and still he did nothing. So not only is Clinton at fault for 9/11 he is
also complicit in the death of numerous embassy employees and the shipmates
on the USS Cole. So once again Bush wins another point.
3. Democrats are also quick to point out that Clinton resided over a booming
economy and at the 10 thousand foot level it appears to be true however
after much closer scrutiny we find the following: the economic expansion was
based upon a false dotcom industry, the board rooms of major corporations
began lying and cheating on their annual reports and the economic recession
started before Clinton left office. President Bush inherited a recession,
followed closely by numerous corporate scandals, followed by the attacks of
9/11(an act by the way, we have already established was caused by Clinton's
inaction). President Bush has now returned the economy to some semblance of
growth and he did it by reducing taxes, developing corporate reporting
requirement with checks and balances and it is beginning to work. So once
again score one for Bush for rebuilding the economy that Clinton rode into
the dirt during his presidency.
4. Democrats also claim that Clinton never took US into an illegal war under
false pretences. Again let's look at the facts surrounding the wasr in
Yugoslavia. The ruler being used against Bush was that he failed to gain
international support form the UN for the war in Iraq, well Clinton didn't
even have the nerve to take the question to the UN instead going around them
and to NATO, which make his war illegal given the comparison and more
egregious since he didn't even try to build consensus with UN allies. The
other half of the charge is that Clinton never took us into war using false
pretences as Bush did, once again that is not true, given that the reason
for the war in Yugoslavia was to stop the genocide that was going on within
the country. To this day none of the mass graves have ever been found and it
appear that the rank and file Democrats don't care but are unwilling to give
the current president the same amount of time to find WMD's. Let's also not
forget the issues of the refugees along the borders of Yugoslavia and
Georgia. Who can forget the number of refugees suffering in the cold of
winter without any shleter all because of Melosovitch(sp), well as with
everything in the Clinton administration all is not as it appears. Clinton
and his allies knew of operation horse shoe for months before they went to
war. This operation was designed to push hundred of thousand of refugees
before it into the neighboring countries e.g. Georgia and other border
nationx, so the question has to be if you know that hundreds of thousands of
refugees are headed your way and you knew for at least six. Why wouldn't you
prepare for them? Because Clinton knew the value of televising the suffering
of hundreds of thousand of refugees and knew that this would help turn US
opinion in the direction he wanted to go in. Now as for Bush and weapons of
mass destruction, every member nations of the UN knew or thought they knew
that Saddam had not disarmed and still had significant WMD's and had failed
to disarm after 12 years. The proof of this is that they all helped ratify
resolution 1441. Once again score one for Bush because he at least tried to
build consensus at the UN which Clinton never attempted and for putting
together the third largest coalition in world history, something Clinton
couldn't even do in Yugoslavia.
Gee that's what Bush 4 and Clinton 0. Hm
.
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
