| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Harry Hope" |
| Date: |
04 Aug 2004 03:23:15 PM |
| Object: |
A presiduncy that will go down in infamy. |
http://www.opednews.com/wade_080404_bush_signature_achievements.htm
Signature Achievements of George W. Bush
By Anthony Wade
OpEdNews.com
President George W. Bush has made it clear coming out of the
Democratic National Convention.
His message is "results matter", and is now fond of pointing out that
John Kerry does not have any "signature achievements."
When one looks at Bush’s record, we can see why he chose this tact;
after all he has so many signature achievements to pick from.
In fact he has so many it is difficult to tell which one he may be
most proud of.
Possibly it is his "War on Terror".
In this signature achievement we see the following "results":
- Spent over 166 billion dollars to blow up two third world
countries that posed no threat to us.
- Has presided over the deaths of close to 1000 US soldiers,
and over 12,000 innocent Iraqi civilians.
- Has not attended one US soldier’s funeral.
- Won’t allow the returning dead from Iraq be seen by the
public.
- He has crafted policy that allows us to torture prisoners,
regardless of their innocence, violating international law.
- This torture has now been reported to have occurred to
children, sexually, in front of their parents. This was used as a
means to "break" them.
- Has not caught Osama bin Hidin.
- Has allowed the Taliban and warlord tribes take over
Afghanistan again.
- Has turned Osama bin Laden from public enemy number one, to
being marginalized and not thought of much.
- Encourages Americans to fly in the face of fear, but plans
on canceling the elections.
- Created the terror color code chart which gives us a vibrant
way of being perpetually scared, without anything of substance behind
the fear. Conveniently, the chart comes in handy whenever trailing on
the polls.
- Has permanently adopted Halliburton as a dependent.
- Has seen an increase in terrorist activity since taking
office.
Hmm, that doesn’t seem very positive.
It can’t be this area; maybe it is in his domestic agenda.
No not in Iraq, here in the US.
Let’s try the environment:
- Created the Clear Skies Initiative, which would completely
overhaul the Clean Air Act, to reduce requirements of businesses that
contribute to pollution. The data has been summarized as follows:
“under Clear Skies sulfur dioxide pollution could increase 34 percent,
mercury pollution could rise by up to 88 percent, and nitrogen oxides
pollution could double”.
- Passed the Healthy Forests Initiative (No Tree Left Behind),
which is a devious handout to the logging industry, which contributed
over $14 million to political campaigns since 1999, with over 80
percent going to Republican lawmakers; President Bush has received
more than $500,000. Healthy Forests is disguised as a fire prevention
bill, which, you guessed it, solves the problem of forest fires by
removing those pesky trees.
- Suspended the new arsenic-in-tap-water standard and
right-to-know requirements, which compel water utilities to divulge
their arsenic levels to their consumers. Interesting, remove the
health restrictions, AND remove their accountability.
- 2005 budget slashes federal funding to prevent lead
poisoning by $35 million, leaving some 40,000 homes contaminated with
lead next year.
- Mountaintop Mining Self-Reporting Program will actually
allow polluting companies that deposit mountaintops into streams which
pollute public waters, to simply self identify and avoid any
prosecution from the federal government.
- Proposed to loosen regulations to let the nuclear industry
dump low-level radioactive waste, which now must be stored in closely
monitored facilities, in regular landfills and hazardous waste sites
that weren't designed to handle these dangerous substances. The rule
change, which could open landfills to such deadly radioactive
materials as cesium, strontium, cobalt and plutonium, would
substantially reduce the nuclear industry's waste-disposal costs.
Yikes, that just doesn’t sound right.
Sounds like the only environmental thing about Bush, is his name.
Well, I am sure when we look at the economy we will see those
signature achievements.
After all according to George, we have just turned a corner and are
not looking back, right?
- The first net loss of jobs since Herbert Hoover. Yes, that
Herbert Hoover from the Great Depression.
- Has lost 1.8 million private sector jobs.
- Handed out tax breaks targeting the richest 1% of this
country, who he affectionately refers to as his base.
- This tax break has not “stimulated” the economy, it has
crippled it and accounts currently for 290 billion dollars of the
deficit.
- Bush has created the second highest lay-off rate in history
at 8.7 percent, only topped by Reagan in the early 1980’s.
- On the average, those who are lucky enough to find work
again are earning an average of $9,160 (21%) less, without medical
insurance.
- 3.7 million American families have lost their medical
insurance under Bush.
- A record 82 million American families have gone without
medical insurance.
- For those who are still lucky enough to have coverage,
family medical insurance premiums have increased over $2,600 under
Bush.
- A new record budget deficit of over 400 billion dollars,
which is 800 billion dollars worse, than when he took office.
- Home foreclosures hit a record high in 2003.
- Personal bankruptcies hit all time high in 2002.
I don’t know what corner Mr. Bush has turned, but it appears he has
left the rest of us behind in this little place we like to call
reality.
Luckily for him, we still have other areas to examine because those
signature achievements should be around here somewhere, kinda like
those WMD, right?
We must be a safer country, where our civil liberties are protected
and we don’t live in a police state.
That would be a great signature achievement.
Let’s take a look at life in George W. Bush’s America:
- George W. Bush has essentially eliminated the provision of
habeas corpus by granting himself unlimited power to declare any
citizen an "enemy combatant". This results in permanent detention, at
Bush’s whim, no counsel, no offer or proof ever has to be made, and
Bush may move the case to any district he wishes.
- Email and library records are now allowed to be monitored
and searched, without probable cause or warrant.
- Brandon Mayfield of Oregon is wrongly arrested for
connection to Madrid bombing; his house is searched by FBI without his
knowledge.
- Steven Kurtz of Buffalo is currently being persecuted, after
his wife died, and is being brought up on bio-terrorism charges, for
his artwork.
- A Wyoming woman is dragged off her cruise ship in cuffs and
leg shackles for an incorrect warrant, involving a $50 “improper food
storage” summons, which she had already paid, months prior.
- A Texas married couple at a Bush rally in West Virginia were
arrested and led away in cuffs. Their offense? Wearing anti-Bush tee
shirts. People wearing pro-Bush shirts were not accosted. The woman,
who worked for FEMA, lost her job immediately. The ACLU is trying to
help the couple fight the case in court.
- A St. Petersburg couple was pepper sprayed by police for
receiving a cell phone call in a theater. Witnesses say the couple did
nothing wrong and were cooperating at the time of the assault by
police.
- A Homeland Security inspector of the United States was
charged with violating a Chinese tourist's civil rights following an
altercation that left the innocent woman's eyes nearly swollen shut
and bumps and bruises on her face and head. This occurred at Niagara
Falls, where the woman was mistaken for being involved with a
marijuana buy. Apparently this officer beat the hell out of the wrong
person.
- A government scientist finishing a candy bar on her way into
a subway station where eating is banned was arrested, handcuffed and
detained for three hours by transit police in Washington DC. Yes,
that’s right, illegal use of a Kit Kat is now punishable with
handcuffs and arrest. The worst part is the Transit Police Chief
actually defended the actions.
- A US couple were removed from a New York-bound flight at
Miami Airport because crewmembers considered a T-shirt one of them was
wearing obscene. The offending tee shirt had a picture of an exposed
breast. Mind you, no passengers complained, the flight staff demanded
they remove the shirt, when the couple correctly asserted their free
speech rights, they were booted off the plane.
- At the presidential conventions, protesters are to be
cordoned off in cages with razor wire. These are referred to as "free
speech zones".
- Just last week John Ashcroft ordered five previously public
documents to be removed from all libraries, without any rationale
given other than the Department determined they were not "appropriate
for external use".
Damn, doesn’t seem like Bush would want to trumpet those results.
If anything, it sounds like we are more in a police state.
Last time I checked, America was supposed to be a "free speech zone".
I think I know what Bush’s signature achievement is.
It must be the integrity with which he campaigns.
- Just last week, Team Bush tried to ascertain the race of a
woman scheduled to photograph ***** Cheney. This is most probably due
to the fact that her name was middle-eastern in sound.
- Two weeks ago, a Bush campaign worker suggested that
American workers unhappy with low-quality jobs should find new ones --
or pop a Prozac to make themselves feel better. Apparently, she is
unaware that without medical insurance, Prozac costs a lot of money.
- The GOP sent out flyers to Florida republican voters telling
them to make sure their vote counts, use absentee ballots! This after
fighting any sane attempts to have a paper trail with the new computer
voting machines, provided by big-time Republican donors.
- Also last week, in order to attend a Cheney rally, you had
to sign an endorsement of Bush. You follow that? You are not allowed
to even ATTEND a public event that ***** Cheney is at, unless you sign
an official document swearing loyalty to GW Bush. Gee, it smells like
Stalin in here.
- A group helping new citizens register vote, supplied the
people with voter registration cards that already had Republican
selected as their party.
Hmm, this doesn’t sound too good to me.
Demanding affiliation, falsifying voter registration cards, and
callous "let them eat Prozac" mentality are not what I want to vote
for.
I would have looked at education, but Bush actually has no record
there to examine.
You see, he ran on No Child Left Behind, but then forgot to fund it.
I do however; wish to state that I finally have found some agreement
with President Bush.
Results do matter.
Maybe he should have checked first if he actually had any.
This is the record of George W. Bush.
This is what he is going to run on, well this and fear.
Hold onto this checklist and refer back to it when he is speaking over
the next few months.
You will hear all sorts of clever catch phrases, and snazzy slogans.
"We have turned a corner and are not looking back."
"My opponent has no signature achievements"
"Results matter."
All they are is words.
Empty words from a shallow man who has done nothing for the first 3.5
years of his term and now expects you to reward him for it.
This isn’t Yale and his daddy can’t help him.
You want proof these are hollow words, try these on:
"I am a uniter, not a divider."
"Real plans for real people."
"Reformer with results."
"Leave no child left behind."
"Compassionate conservatism."
Has George W. Bush fulfilled any of these slogans, which he sold you
on in 2000?
His has been the most divisive administration in history, with people
from his own camp constantly defecting.
He has had no real plans, other than wars based on lies and how to
avoid the Geneva Conventions.
After nearly four years, he has reformed nothing, and has no results
other than what is listed in this article.
Children have been not only left behind, but also forgotten about and
in other countries, tortured.
Now he wants to say he is an education President?
Where was he the first three and a half years?
Finally, there is not only nothing compassionate about George W. Bush,
there is actually nothing conservative either.
No, I am sorry George, these are your signature achievements and they
say you do not deserve another term.
The right will say that I am not "optimistic" or that I am part of the
"blame America first" crowd.
Don’t you believe them.
I am fully optimistic that if we get rid of this war-profiteering,
ruin education, cripple the environment, trash the bill of rights, oil
for blood president, that yes we can be a great nation once again.
I don’t blame America.
America voted for Gore.
_____________________________________________
There ya go. Now don't ever, ever let me hear ya say that Li'l Georgie
hasn't achieved anything. His record is clear for all to see.
Harry
.
|
|
| User: "Jake WK" |
|
| Title: Re: A presiduncy that will go down in infamy. |
04 Aug 2004 04:06:00 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 20:23:15 GMT, Harry Hope <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
Yeah, he's amazingly craven when he's not just being dangerous. I've
known for some time that years down the line, after the decent
Republicans finally get fed up enough to rise up on their hind legs
and take their party back----the name "Bush" will be looked upon as
something far worse than "McCarthy". Between the father and the son,
the name Bush will be regarded as a dark stain on the party's history
and held out as an example of what they must never let themselves
become again.
Jake
http://www.opednews.com/wade_080404_bush_signature_achievements.htm
Signature Achievements of George W. Bush
By Anthony Wade
OpEdNews.com
President George W. Bush has made it clear coming out of the
Democratic National Convention.
His message is "results matter", and is now fond of pointing out that
John Kerry does not have any "signature achievements."
When one looks at Bush?s record, we can see why he chose this tact;
after all he has so many signature achievements to pick from.
In fact he has so many it is difficult to tell which one he may be
most proud of.
Possibly it is his "War on Terror".
In this signature achievement we see the following "results":
- Spent over 166 billion dollars to blow up two third world
countries that posed no threat to us.
- Has presided over the deaths of close to 1000 US soldiers,
and over 12,000 innocent Iraqi civilians.
- Has not attended one US soldier?s funeral.
- Won?t allow the returning dead from Iraq be seen by the
public.
- He has crafted policy that allows us to torture prisoners,
regardless of their innocence, violating international law.
- This torture has now been reported to have occurred to
children, sexually, in front of their parents. This was used as a
means to "break" them.
- Has not caught Osama bin Hidin.
- Has allowed the Taliban and warlord tribes take over
Afghanistan again.
- Has turned Osama bin Laden from public enemy number one, to
being marginalized and not thought of much.
- Encourages Americans to fly in the face of fear, but plans
on canceling the elections.
- Created the terror color code chart which gives us a vibrant
way of being perpetually scared, without anything of substance behind
the fear. Conveniently, the chart comes in handy whenever trailing on
the polls.
- Has permanently adopted Halliburton as a dependent.
- Has seen an increase in terrorist activity since taking
office.
Hmm, that doesn?t seem very positive.
It can?t be this area; maybe it is in his domestic agenda.
No not in Iraq, here in the US.
Let?s try the environment:
- Created the Clear Skies Initiative, which would completely
overhaul the Clean Air Act, to reduce requirements of businesses that
contribute to pollution. The data has been summarized as follows:
?under Clear Skies sulfur dioxide pollution could increase 34 percent,
mercury pollution could rise by up to 88 percent, and nitrogen oxides
pollution could double?.
- Passed the Healthy Forests Initiative (No Tree Left Behind),
which is a devious handout to the logging industry, which contributed
over $14 million to political campaigns since 1999, with over 80
percent going to Republican lawmakers; President Bush has received
more than $500,000. Healthy Forests is disguised as a fire prevention
bill, which, you guessed it, solves the problem of forest fires by
removing those pesky trees.
- Suspended the new arsenic-in-tap-water standard and
right-to-know requirements, which compel water utilities to divulge
their arsenic levels to their consumers. Interesting, remove the
health restrictions, AND remove their accountability.
- 2005 budget slashes federal funding to prevent lead
poisoning by $35 million, leaving some 40,000 homes contaminated with
lead next year.
- Mountaintop Mining Self-Reporting Program will actually
allow polluting companies that deposit mountaintops into streams which
pollute public waters, to simply self identify and avoid any
prosecution from the federal government.
- Proposed to loosen regulations to let the nuclear industry
dump low-level radioactive waste, which now must be stored in closely
monitored facilities, in regular landfills and hazardous waste sites
that weren't designed to handle these dangerous substances. The rule
change, which could open landfills to such deadly radioactive
materials as cesium, strontium, cobalt and plutonium, would
substantially reduce the nuclear industry's waste-disposal costs.
Yikes, that just doesn?t sound right.
Sounds like the only environmental thing about Bush, is his name.
Well, I am sure when we look at the economy we will see those
signature achievements.
After all according to George, we have just turned a corner and are
not looking back, right?
- The first net loss of jobs since Herbert Hoover. Yes, that
Herbert Hoover from the Great Depression.
- Has lost 1.8 million private sector jobs.
- Handed out tax breaks targeting the richest 1% of this
country, who he affectionately refers to as his base.
- This tax break has not ?stimulated? the economy, it has
crippled it and accounts currently for 290 billion dollars of the
deficit.
- Bush has created the second highest lay-off rate in history
at 8.7 percent, only topped by Reagan in the early 1980?s.
- On the average, those who are lucky enough to find work
again are earning an average of $9,160 (21%) less, without medical
insurance.
- 3.7 million American families have lost their medical
insurance under Bush.
- A record 82 million American families have gone without
medical insurance.
- For those who are still lucky enough to have coverage,
family medical insurance premiums have increased over $2,600 under
Bush.
- A new record budget deficit of over 400 billion dollars,
which is 800 billion dollars worse, than when he took office.
- Home foreclosures hit a record high in 2003.
- Personal bankruptcies hit all time high in 2002.
I don?t know what corner Mr. Bush has turned, but it appears he has
left the rest of us behind in this little place we like to call
reality.
Luckily for him, we still have other areas to examine because those
signature achievements should be around here somewhere, kinda like
those WMD, right?
We must be a safer country, where our civil liberties are protected
and we don?t live in a police state.
That would be a great signature achievement.
Let?s take a look at life in George W. Bush?s America:
- George W. Bush has essentially eliminated the provision of
habeas corpus by granting himself unlimited power to declare any
citizen an "enemy combatant". This results in permanent detention, at
Bush?s whim, no counsel, no offer or proof ever has to be made, and
Bush may move the case to any district he wishes.
- Email and library records are now allowed to be monitored
and searched, without probable cause or warrant.
- Brandon Mayfield of Oregon is wrongly arrested for
connection to Madrid bombing; his house is searched by FBI without his
knowledge.
- Steven Kurtz of Buffalo is currently being persecuted, after
his wife died, and is being brought up on bio-terrorism charges, for
his artwork.
- A Wyoming woman is dragged off her cruise ship in cuffs and
leg shackles for an incorrect warrant, involving a $50 ?improper food
storage? summons, which she had already paid, months prior.
- A Texas married couple at a Bush rally in West Virginia were
arrested and led away in cuffs. Their offense? Wearing anti-Bush tee
shirts. People wearing pro-Bush shirts were not accosted. The woman,
who worked for FEMA, lost her job immediately. The ACLU is trying to
help the couple fight the case in court.
- A St. Petersburg couple was pepper sprayed by police for
receiving a cell phone call in a theater. Witnesses say the couple did
nothing wrong and were cooperating at the time of the assault by
police.
- A Homeland Security inspector of the United States was
charged with violating a Chinese tourist's civil rights following an
altercation that left the innocent woman's eyes nearly swollen shut
and bumps and bruises on her face and head. This occurred at Niagara
Falls, where the woman was mistaken for being involved with a
marijuana buy. Apparently this officer beat the hell out of the wrong
person.
- A government scientist finishing a candy bar on her way into
a subway station where eating is banned was arrested, handcuffed and
detained for three hours by transit police in Washington DC. Yes,
that?s right, illegal use of a Kit Kat is now punishable with
handcuffs and arrest. The worst part is the Transit Police Chief
actually defended the actions.
- A US couple were removed from a New York-bound flight at
Miami Airport because crewmembers considered a T-shirt one of them was
wearing obscene. The offending tee shirt had a picture of an exposed
breast. Mind you, no passengers complained, the flight staff demanded
they remove the shirt, when the couple correctly asserted their free
speech rights, they were booted off the plane.
- At the presidential conventions, protesters are to be
cordoned off in cages with razor wire. These are referred to as "free
speech zones".
- Just last week John Ashcroft ordered five previously public
documents to be removed from all libraries, without any rationale
given other than the Department determined they were not "appropriate
for external use".
Damn, doesn?t seem like Bush would want to trumpet those results.
If anything, it sounds like we are more in a police state.
Last time I checked, America was supposed to be a "free speech zone".
I think I know what Bush?s signature achievement is.
It must be the integrity with which he campaigns.
- Just last week, Team Bush tried to ascertain the race of a
woman scheduled to photograph ***** Cheney. This is most probably due
to the fact that her name was middle-eastern in sound.
- Two weeks ago, a Bush campaign worker suggested that
American workers unhappy with low-quality jobs should find new ones --
or pop a Prozac to make themselves feel better. Apparently, she is
unaware that without medical insurance, Prozac costs a lot of money.
- The GOP sent out flyers to Florida republican voters telling
them to make sure their vote counts, use absentee ballots! This after
fighting any sane attempts to have a paper trail with the new computer
voting machines, provided by big-time Republican donors.
- Also last week, in order to attend a Cheney rally, you had
to sign an endorsement of Bush. You follow that? You are not allowed
to even ATTEND a public event that ***** Cheney is at, unless you sign
an official document swearing loyalty to GW Bush. Gee, it smells like
Stalin in here.
- A group helping new citizens register vote, supplied the
people with voter registration cards that already had Republican
selected as their party.
Hmm, this doesn?t sound too good to me.
Demanding affiliation, falsifying voter registration cards, and
callous "let them eat Prozac" mentality are not what I want to vote
for.
I would have looked at education, but Bush actually has no record
there to examine.
You see, he ran on No Child Left Behind, but then forgot to fund it.
I do however; wish to state that I finally have found some agreement
with President Bush.
Results do matter.
Maybe he should have checked first if he actually had any.
This is the record of George W. Bush.
This is what he is going to run on, well this and fear.
Hold onto this checklist and refer back to it when he is speaking over
the next few months.
You will hear all sorts of clever catch phrases, and snazzy slogans.
"We have turned a corner and are not looking back."
"My opponent has no signature achievements"
"Results matter."
All they are is words.
Empty words from a shallow man who has done nothing for the first 3.5
years of his term and now expects you to reward him for it.
This isn?t Yale and his daddy can?t help him.
You want proof these are hollow words, try these on:
"I am a uniter, not a divider."
"Real plans for real people."
"Reformer with results."
"Leave no child left behind."
"Compassionate conservatism."
Has George W. Bush fulfilled any of these slogans, which he sold you
on in 2000?
His has been the most divisive administration in history, with people
from his own camp constantly defecting.
He has had no real plans, other than wars based on lies and how to
avoid the Geneva Conventions.
After nearly four years, he has reformed nothing, and has no results
other than what is listed in this article.
Children have been not only left behind, but also forgotten about and
in other countries, tortured.
Now he wants to say he is an education President?
Where was he the first three and a half years?
Finally, there is not only nothing compassionate about George W. Bush,
there is actually nothing conservative either.
No, I am sorry George, these are your signature achievements and they
say you do not deserve another term.
The right will say that I am not "optimistic" or that I am part of the
"blame America first" crowd.
Don?t you believe them.
I am fully optimistic that if we get rid of this war-profiteering,
ruin education, cripple the environment, trash the bill of rights, oil
for blood president, that yes we can be a great nation once again.
I don?t blame America.
America voted for Gore.
_____________________________________________
There ya go. Now don't ever, ever let me hear ya say that Li'l Georgie
hasn't achieved anything. His record is clear for all to see.
Harry
.
|
|
|
| User: "jps" |
|
| Title: Re: A presiduncy that will go down in infamy. |
04 Aug 2004 06:17:41 PM |
|
|
In article <yk4RQXVljnFEEfcDxvJiwa6gebyp@4ax.com>,
says...
On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 20:23:15 GMT, Harry Hope <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
Yeah, he's amazingly craven when he's not just being dangerous. I've
known for some time that years down the line, after the decent
Republicans finally get fed up enough to rise up on their hind legs
and take their party back----the name "Bush" will be looked upon as
something far worse than "McCarthy". Between the father and the son,
the name Bush will be regarded as a dark stain on the party's history
and held out as an example of what they must never let themselves
become again.
Jake
As far as stains go, I'd much rather have the sort that ended up on
Monica's dress than the one that's being set currently.
jps
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Harold" |
|
| Title: Re: A presiduncy that will go down in infamy. |
04 Aug 2004 10:02:12 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 16:06:00 -0500, Jake WK <jakewk@gimmejam.com>
wrote:
Yeah, he's amazingly craven when he's not just being dangerous. I've
known for some time that years down the line, after the decent
Republicans finally get fed up enough to rise up on their hind legs
and take their party back----the name "Bush" will be looked upon as
something far worse than "McCarthy".
Even worse than that war mongering, tax cutting, military-spending
John F. Kennedy, huh?
Bush is trying something totally new, something totally daring,
something every liberal has demanded the US, fight right-wing fascist
dictators.
Maybe he will succeed, and help start a democracy in the Middle East.
Maybe he won't. In any case, he will be important to history.
You never will be.
Regards, Harold (Capitalist Pig)
----
The cost of freedom is always high, but Americans have always paid it.
And one path we shall never choose, and that is
the path of surrender, or submission."
----President John F. Kennedy
.
|
|
|
| User: "biasbros" |
|
| Title: Re: A presiduncy that will go down in infamy. |
04 Aug 2004 11:55:33 PM |
|
|
"Harold" <hcbrashears@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:vi83h05lmlt5ofji1kp39ut0cb149f0vme@4ax.com...
On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 16:06:00 -0500, Jake WK <jakewk@gimmejam.com>
wrote:
Yeah, he's amazingly craven when he's not just being dangerous. I've
known for some time that years down the line, after the decent
Republicans finally get fed up enough to rise up on their hind legs
and take their party back----the name "Bush" will be looked upon as
something far worse than "McCarthy".
Even worse than that war mongering, tax cutting, military-spending
John F. Kennedy, huh?
Bush is trying something totally new, something totally daring,
something every liberal has demanded the US, fight right-wing fascist
dictators.
Maybe he will succeed, and help start a democracy in the Middle East.
Do you have any idea what is really going on in Iraq right now? I think it
is called civil war.
Maybe he won't. In any case, he will be important to history.
Like all political failures.
You never will be.
Nor will you.
Regards, Harold (Capitalist Pig)
----
The cost of freedom is always high, but Americans have always paid it.
And one path we shall never choose, and that is
the path of surrender, or submission."
----President John F. Kennedy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Fleagle" |
|
| Title: Re: A presiduncy that will go down in infamy. |
05 Aug 2004 09:09:36 PM |
|
|
"biasbros" <biasbros@prodigy.net> wrote in message
news:95jQc.2389$dT2.326@newssvr16.news.prodigy.com...
"Harold" <hcbrashears@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:vi83h05lmlt5ofji1kp39ut0cb149f0vme@4ax.com...
On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 16:06:00 -0500, Jake WK <jakewk@gimmejam.com>
wrote:
Yeah, he's amazingly craven when he's not just being dangerous. I've
known for some time that years down the line, after the decent
Republicans finally get fed up enough to rise up on their hind legs
and take their party back----the name "Bush" will be looked upon as
something far worse than "McCarthy".
Even worse than that war mongering, tax cutting, military-spending
John F. Kennedy, huh?
Bush is trying something totally new, something totally daring,
something every liberal has demanded the US, fight right-wing fascist
dictators.
Maybe he will succeed, and help start a democracy in the Middle East.
Do you have any idea what is really going on in Iraq right now? I think it
is called civil war.
If it's a civil war, how do you explain the climbing American death toll?
Maybe he won't. In any case, he will be important to history.
Like all political failures.
You never will be.
Nor will you.
Regards, Harold (Capitalist Pig)
----
The cost of freedom is always high, but Americans have always paid it.
And one path we shall never choose, and that is
the path of surrender, or submission."
----President John F. Kennedy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Larry Hewitt" |
|
| Title: Re: A presiduncy that will go down in infamy. |
05 Aug 2004 09:40:49 PM |
|
|
"Al Fleagle" <fleagle@seark.net> wrote in message
news:MLBQc.3456$Nd7.2945@fe39.usenetserver.com...
"biasbros" <biasbros@prodigy.net> wrote in message
news:95jQc.2389$dT2.326@newssvr16.news.prodigy.com...
"Harold" <hcbrashears@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:vi83h05lmlt5ofji1kp39ut0cb149f0vme@4ax.com...
On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 16:06:00 -0500, Jake WK <jakewk@gimmejam.com>
wrote:
Yeah, he's amazingly craven when he's not just being dangerous. I've
known for some time that years down the line, after the decent
Republicans finally get fed up enough to rise up on their hind legs
and take their party back----the name "Bush" will be looked upon as
something far worse than "McCarthy".
Even worse than that war mongering, tax cutting, military-spending
John F. Kennedy, huh?
Bush is trying something totally new, something totally daring,
something every liberal has demanded the US, fight right-wing fascist
dictators.
Maybe he will succeed, and help start a democracy in the Middle East.
Do you have any idea what is really going on in Iraq right now? I think
it
is called civil war.
If it's a civil war, how do you explain the climbing American death toll?
We're taking sides.
Larry
Maybe he won't. In any case, he will be important to history.
Like all political failures.
You never will be.
Nor will you.
Regards, Harold (Capitalist Pig)
----
The cost of freedom is always high, but Americans have always paid it.
And one path we shall never choose, and that is
the path of surrender, or submission."
----President John F. Kennedy
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tempest" |
|
| Title: Re: A presiduncy that will go down in infamy. |
05 Aug 2004 09:54:44 PM |
|
|
Al Fleagle wrote:
"biasbros" <biasbros@prodigy.net> wrote in message
news:95jQc.2389$dT2.326@newssvr16.news.prodigy.com...
"Harold" <hcbrashears@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:vi83h05lmlt5ofji1kp39ut0cb149f0vme@4ax.com...
On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 16:06:00 -0500, Jake WK <jakewk@gimmejam.com>
wrote:
Yeah, he's amazingly craven when he's not just being dangerous. I've
known for some time that years down the line, after the decent
Republicans finally get fed up enough to rise up on their hind legs
and take their party back----the name "Bush" will be looked upon as
something far worse than "McCarthy".
Even worse than that war mongering, tax cutting, military-spending
John F. Kennedy, huh?
Bush is trying something totally new, something totally daring,
something every liberal has demanded the US, fight right-wing fascist
dictators.
Maybe he will succeed, and help start a democracy in the Middle East.
Do you have any idea what is really going on in Iraq right now? I think it
is called civil war.
If it's a civil war, how do you explain the climbing American death toll?
If it's not a civil war, how do you explain Iraqi insurgents targeting
Iraqi police and politicians?
Maybe he won't. In any case, he will be important to history.
Like all political failures.
You never will be.
Nor will you.
Regards, Harold (Capitalist Pig)
----
The cost of freedom is always high, but Americans have always paid it.
And one path we shall never choose, and that is
the path of surrender, or submission."
----President John F. Kennedy
--
"Ignorance is an evil weed, which dictators may cultivate among their
dupes, but which no democracy can afford among its citizens."
- William H. Beveridge, 1944
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Harold" |
|
| Title: Re: A presiduncy that will go down in infamy. |
05 Aug 2004 07:35:43 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 04:55:33 GMT, "biasbros" <biasbros@prodigy.net>
wrote:
"Harold" <hcbrashears@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:vi83h05lmlt5ofji1kp39ut0cb149f0vme@4ax.com...
On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 16:06:00 -0500, Jake WK <jakewk@gimmejam.com>
wrote:
Yeah, he's amazingly craven when he's not just being dangerous. I've
known for some time that years down the line, after the decent
Republicans finally get fed up enough to rise up on their hind legs
and take their party back----the name "Bush" will be looked upon as
something far worse than "McCarthy".
Even worse than that war mongering, tax cutting, military-spending
John F. Kennedy, huh?
Bush is trying something totally new, something totally daring,
something every liberal has demanded the US, fight right-wing fascist
dictators.
Maybe he will succeed, and help start a democracy in the Middle East.
Do you have any idea what is really going on in Iraq right now? I think it
is called civil war.
I call it an insurrection, by left over remnants of a vicious
dictatorship, allied with a terrorist organization.
Both supported by "freedom-loving" Dims, naturally.
Maybe he won't. In any case, he will be important to history.
Like all political failures.
He may fail, as I said. If he does, you may congratulate yourself for
your tiny part in denying freedom to 24 million people. I am sure it
will make you feel all warm inside.
You never will be.
Nor will you.
I never claimed I would. Thanks for your concern, however.
Regards, Harold (Capitalist Pig)
----
The cost of freedom is always high, but Americans have always paid it.
And one path we shall never choose, and that is
the path of surrender, or submission."
----President John F. Kennedy
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "jps" |
|
| Title: Re: A presiduncy that will go down in infamy. |
04 Aug 2004 10:59:21 PM |
|
|
In article <vi83h05lmlt5ofji1kp39ut0cb149f0vme@4ax.com>,
hcbrashears@netscape.com says...
On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 16:06:00 -0500, Jake WK <jakewk@gimmejam.com>
wrote:
Yeah, he's amazingly craven when he's not just being dangerous. I've
known for some time that years down the line, after the decent
Republicans finally get fed up enough to rise up on their hind legs
and take their party back----the name "Bush" will be looked upon as
something far worse than "McCarthy".
Even worse than that war mongering, tax cutting, military-spending
John F. Kennedy, huh?
Bush is trying something totally new, something totally daring,
something every liberal has demanded the US, fight right-wing fascist
dictators.
Maybe he will succeed, and help start a democracy in the Middle East.
Maybe he won't. In any case, he will be important to history.
As were the British. And what role, pray tell, do they play in world
affairs today?
Haggard mistress to an insane American President.
jps
.
|
|
|
| User: "Harold" |
|
| Title: Re: A presiduncy that will go down in infamy. |
05 Aug 2004 07:32:34 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004 20:59:21 -0700, jps <trash@thedump.com> wrote:
In article <vi83h05lmlt5ofji1kp39ut0cb149f0vme@4ax.com>,
hcbrashears@netscape.com says...
On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 16:06:00 -0500, Jake WK <jakewk@gimmejam.com>
wrote:
Yeah, he's amazingly craven when he's not just being dangerous. I've
known for some time that years down the line, after the decent
Republicans finally get fed up enough to rise up on their hind legs
and take their party back----the name "Bush" will be looked upon as
something far worse than "McCarthy".
Even worse than that war mongering, tax cutting, military-spending
John F. Kennedy, huh?
Bush is trying something totally new, something totally daring,
something every liberal has demanded the US, fight right-wing fascist
dictators.
Maybe he will succeed, and help start a democracy in the Middle East.
Maybe he won't. In any case, he will be important to history.
As were the British. And what role, pray tell, do they play in world
affairs today?
Had they not been great before, do you think they would be now? Is
there some point here?
Haggard mistress to an insane American President.
Clinton got you too, huh? My regrets.
Regards, Harold (Capitalist Pig)
----
The cost of freedom is always high, but Americans have always paid it.
And one path we shall never choose, and that is
the path of surrender, or submission."
----President John F. Kennedy
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: A presiduncy that will go down in infamy. |
05 Aug 2004 01:24:01 PM |
|
|
On 4-Aug-2004, Harold <hcbrashears@netscape.com> wrote:
Yeah, he's amazingly craven when he's not just being dangerous. I've
known for some time that years down the line, after the decent
Republicans finally get fed up enough to rise up on their hind legs
and take their party back----the name "Bush" will be looked upon as
something far worse than "McCarthy".
Even worse than that war mongering, tax cutting, military-spending
John F. Kennedy, huh?
Huh? Since when did the name "John F Kennedy" get smeared?
Maybe you need to look up Sen McCarthy and McCarthyism so you understand
what was said before you punch your auto-response button and post something
that you should be embarassed about.
--
"We liberals were right about Iraq. That makes us smarter than the
editorial staff of the NY Times!" [Tazmanian Devil <myob@biteme.com]
.
|
|
|
| User: "Harold" |
|
| Title: Re: A presiduncy that will go down in infamy. |
05 Aug 2004 07:39:06 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 5 Aug 2004 18:24:01 GMT,
wrote:
On 4-Aug-2004, Harold <hcbrashears@netscape.com> wrote:
Yeah, he's amazingly craven when he's not just being dangerous. I've
known for some time that years down the line, after the decent
Republicans finally get fed up enough to rise up on their hind legs
and take their party back----the name "Bush" will be looked upon as
something far worse than "McCarthy".
Even worse than that war mongering, tax cutting, military-spending
John F. Kennedy, huh?
Huh? Since when did the name "John F Kennedy" get smeared?
By you, I guess. I was praising him.
Maybe you need to look up Sen McCarthy and McCarthyism so you understand
what was said before you punch your auto-response button and post something
that you should be embarassed about.
And this follows from John Kennedy how? Are you claiming that not
only Robert Kennedy, but John F. Kennedy was also involved with Sen.
McCarthy?
Prove it. I have seen no evidence linking John Kennedy to McCarthy,
as you have done here.
Regards, Harold (Capitalist Pig)
----
The cost of freedom is always high, but Americans have always paid it.
And one path we shall never choose, and that is
the path of surrender, or submission."
----President John F. Kennedy
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: A presiduncy that will go down in infamy. |
05 Aug 2004 10:01:39 PM |
|
|
On 5-Aug-2004, Harold <hcbrashears@netscape.com> wrote:
On 4-Aug-2004, Harold <hcbrashears@netscape.com> wrote:
Yeah, he's amazingly craven when he's not just being dangerous. I've
known for some time that years down the line, after the decent
Republicans finally get fed up enough to rise up on their hind legs
and take their party back----the name "Bush" will be looked upon as
something far worse than "McCarthy".
Even worse than that war mongering, tax cutting, military-spending
John F. Kennedy, huh?
Huh? Since when did the name "John F Kennedy" get smeared?
By you, I guess. I was praising him.
Maybe you need to look up Sen McCarthy and McCarthyism so you understand
what was said before you punch your auto-response button and post
something
that you should be embarassed about.
And this follows from John Kennedy how? Are you claiming that not
only Robert Kennedy, but John F. Kennedy was also involved with Sen.
McCarthy?
Prove it. I have seen no evidence linking John Kennedy to McCarthy,
as you have done here.
Regards, Harold (Capitalist Pig)
Aren't you a clever little boy? Another rightwinger with nothing left to
say.
--
"We liberals were right about Iraq. That makes us smarter than the
editorial staff of the NY Times!" [Tazmanian Devil <myob@biteme.com]
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: A presiduncy that will go down in infamy. |
07 Aug 2004 12:40:30 PM |
|
|
On 7-Aug-2004, Harold <hcbrashears@netscape.com> wrote:
Prove it. I have seen no evidence linking John Kennedy to McCarthy,
as you have done here.
Regards, Harold (Capitalist Pig)
Aren't you a clever little boy? Another rightwinger with nothing left to
say.
I see that, instead of addressing the topic you brought up, you engage
in ad hominem attacks.
Graduate of a public grammar school?
Regards, Harold (Capitalist Pig)
Addressing WHAT topic? That Kennedy and McCarthy are linked. Heh heh heh.
You can take that one anywhere you choose in your little mental fairyland. I
don't think you'll find any takers.
And yes, I'm a graduate of public grammar school, public high school, and
two public universities, one of the later being world renown.
What's you excuse? Graduate of a grammar school?
--
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we.
They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country
and our people, and neither do we."
--George DubYa "One Term Wonder" Bush
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-4389852,00.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "Harold" |
|
| Title: Re: A presiduncy that will go down in infamy. |
09 Aug 2004 07:59:27 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 17:40:30 GMT,
wrote:
On 7-Aug-2004, Harold <hcbrashears@netscape.com> wrote:
Prove it. I have seen no evidence linking John Kennedy to McCarthy,
as you have done here.
Regards, Harold (Capitalist Pig)
Aren't you a clever little boy? Another rightwinger with nothing left to
say.
I see that, instead of addressing the topic you brought up, you engage
in ad hominem attacks.
Graduate of a public grammar school?
Regards, Harold (Capitalist Pig)
Addressing WHAT topic? That Kennedy and McCarthy are linked.
Did you forget you brought it up? I said that JFK was a war
mongering, tax cutting, military-spender. In fact, he was. A major
Dem platform was the "missile gap", and Kennedy started the major
production of several missile systems in order, he claimed, to close
this defense gap. JFK, at the same time, cut taxes.
You should know this. It is to JFK's credit he did these things.
Don't run from History!
Regards, Harold (Capitalist Pig)
----
The cost of freedom is always high, but Americans have always paid it.
And one path we shall never choose, and that is
the path of surrender, or submission."
----President John F. Kennedy
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Levinson" |
|
| Title: Re: A presiduncy that will go down in infamy. |
06 Aug 2004 02:14:59 PM |
|
|
Yes, if Kerry is elected he will go down in history as America's Kurt
Waldheim. http://www.stentorian.com/politics/warcrim.html
Harry Hope wrote:
http://www.opednews.com/wade_080404_bush_signature_achievements.htm
Signature Achievements of George W. Bush
By Anthony Wade
OpEdNews.com
President George W. Bush has made it clear coming out of the
Democratic National Convention.
His message is "results matter", and is now fond of pointing out that
John Kerry does not have any "signature achievements."
When one looks at Bush’s record, we can see why he chose this tact;
after all he has so many signature achievements to pick from.
In fact he has so many it is difficult to tell which one he may be
most proud of.
Possibly it is his "War on Terror".
In this signature achievement we see the following "results":
- Spent over 166 billion dollars to blow up two third world
countries that posed no threat to us.
Afghanistan? The Taliban/ Al Qaida nest?
- Has presided over the deaths of close to 1000 US soldiers,
and over 12,000 innocent Iraqi civilians.
- Has not attended one US soldier’s funeral.
Kerry effectively pissed all over the graves of the 57,000 soldiers who
died in Vietnam, by deriding them as war criminals and comparing them to
Genghis Khan.
--Bill
http://www.stentorian.com/politics/kerry/ Dossier on John Kerry, his
association with racists and anti-Semites. Royalty-free downloadable
leaflets.
.
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|