| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Harry Hope" |
| Date: |
16 Aug 2006 04:13:16 PM |
| Object: |
A Split In the Racist Right |
http://www.alternet.org/story/40343/
August 16, 2006
A Split In the Racist Right
By Heidi Beirich and Mark Potok, Intelligence Report. Posted
A rift has opened between those who see blacks, Hispanics and Muslims
as the primary enemy, and those who blame Jews for every evil.
For a gathering of people devoted to denouncing the inferiority of
blacks and sounding the alarm about civilization-threatening Muslims,
the biannual conferences thrown by the New Century Foundation,
publisher of the racist newsletter American Renaissance, are decidedly
genteel affairs.
Men dress in suits and ties, women in formal business attire, and
there are no uniformed skinheads or Klansmen to be seen.
Large plasma television screens, Starbucks coffee spreads and fancy
linens adorn the hotel meeting hall.
Epithets have no place here.
Or at least they didn't.
At the latest edition of the conferences that began in 1994, held this
February at the Hyatt Dulles hotel, a nasty spat broke out that upset
the gathering's decorum -- and may even shape the future of the
radical right.
It began when David Duke, the former Klan leader and author of Jewish
Supremacism, strode to a microphone after French author Guillaume Faye
wrapped up a talk vilifying Muslims entitled "The Threat to the West."
Duke thanked Faye for remarks that "touched my genes."
But then he went one further.
"There is a power in the world that dominates our media, influences
our government and that has led to the internal destruction of our
will and spirit," Duke said, according to an undisputed account in The
Forward newspaper.
"Tell us, tell us," someone in the back yelled.
"I'm not going to say it," Duke replied.
Laughter began to fill the room, until a short, angry man leaped from
his seat, walked up to Duke and began to curse.
"You fucking Nazi, you've disgraced this meeting!" he said.
And with that, Michael Hart, a Jewish astrophysicist and long-time
attendee at American Renaissance conferences, headed for the door.
As many as 50 people at the conference began to jeer and point at the
rapidly disappearing Hart.
This extraordinary incident marked the beginning of an open rift
between those on the radical right who see blacks, Hispanics and
Muslims as the primary enemy, and those who say "the Jews" are
ultimately behind every evil -- a split that has usually stayed just
below the surface but now threatens a leading institution of American
extremism.
While in the past he has managed to bridge this divide mainly by
ignoring it, American Renaissance founder Jared Taylor now must
finally come to terms with the split.
His dilemma boils down to this:
Throw out the anti-Semites and try to build a larger movement with
electoral possibilities like those increasingly seen in Britain and
Germany;
or openly join hands with the very energetic neo-Nazis, even though
that means the loss of any remaining shred of respectability.
"These are the makings of a major schism," wrote Shawn Mercer,
co-founder and moderator of American Renaissance's AR List, an E-mail
group.
"If American Renaissance ultimately fails as a result of this
donnybrook at the convention, it will be a sad, possibly fatal turn of
events for the future of whites."
________________________________________________________
Harry
.
|
|
| User: "GatherNoMoss" |
|
| Title: Re: A Split In the Racist Right |
16 Aug 2006 04:50:00 PM |
|
|
The KKK traditionally votes Democrat.
Hhmmmm...which Party is it that has a former Grand Poo-ba Wizard fo
the KKK...?
Oh yeah, Democratic Sen. Byrd.
"In 1976, David Duke sought a seat in the Louisiana State Senate as a
Democrat. In 1988, he ran in the Democratic Party primary for President
of the United States. After a dismal showing in the Democratic
primaries, he appeared on many state ballots as the nominee of the
Populist Party and received approximately 25,000 votes in the 1988
general election."
.
|
|
|
| User: "John" |
|
| Title: Re: A Split In the Racist Right |
17 Aug 2006 09:40:26 AM |
|
|
GatherNoMoss wrote:
The KKK traditionally votes Democrat.
Hhmmmm...which Party is it that has a former Grand Poo-ba Wizard fo
the KKK...?
Oh yeah, Democratic Sen. Byrd.
Um, no. Byrd joined the KKK in his early 20's--something he has
repeatedly expressed regret for. He was NEVER a Grand Wizard. You are
a liar.
John
"In 1976, David Duke sought a seat in the Louisiana State Senate as a
Democrat. In 1988, he ran in the Democratic Party primary for President
of the United States. After a dismal showing in the Democratic
primaries, he appeared on many state ballots as the nominee of the
Populist Party and received approximately 25,000 votes in the 1988
general election."
.
|
|
|
| User: "GatherNoMoss" |
|
| Title: Re: A Split In the Racist Right |
19 Aug 2006 06:57:50 PM |
|
|
John wrote:
GatherNoMoss wrote:
The KKK traditionally votes Democrat.
Hhmmmm...which Party is it that has a former Grand Poo-ba Wizard fo
the KKK...?
Oh yeah, Democratic Sen. Byrd.
Um, no. Byrd joined the KKK in his early 20's--something he has
repeatedly expressed regret for. He was NEVER a Grand Wizard. You are
a liar.
John
You call me a liar ? It took me 30 seconds to confirm what I said.
Now you're the liar !
"Exalted Cyclops" and "Kleagle!
And even as late as 1997 he states young people shouldn't join the KKK
because "you inhibit your operations in the political arena".
HAHAHAHAHAHA !! Don't join because it's wrong....but because it may
get in the way of your political career !!!
Well no S*** !...that is if you're a Republican. Evidently it doesn't
hurt your career at all if you're a Democrat.
A Republican that was EVER in the KKK doesn't have a freaking chance
in hell of ever serving office....not even as DOG CATCHER let alone US
Senator !
******** In the early 1940s, when Byrd was approximately 24 years old,
he joined the Ku Klux Klan, which he had seen holding parades in
Matoaka, West Virginia, as a child, his father having also been a Klan
member[3]. Byrd was unanimously elected to be the leader, known as the
Exalted Cyclops, of his local chapter. [4] Byrd, in his autobiography,
attributed the beginnings of his political career to this incident,
though he lamented that they involved the Klan. According to Byrd's
recollection, Baskin told him, "You have a talent for leadership,
Bob... The country needs young men like you in the leadership of the
nation." Byrd recalls that "suddenly lights flashed in my mind! Someone
important had recognized my abilities. I was only 23 or 24, and the
thought of a political career had never struck me. But strike me that
night, it did." [5] The KKK was seen as a stepping stone for aspiring
southern politicians - one of the reasons attributed to Byrd's
membership. [1] [2]
He participated in the KKK for a period of time during World War II,
holding the titles "Kleagle", which indicated a Klan recruiter, and
"Exalted Cyclops." Byrd did not serve in the military during the war,
working instead as a welder in a Baltimore shipyard, assembling
warships.
Though Byrd did not serve himself, he commented on the 1945 controversy
raging over the idea of racially integrating the military. In his book
When Jim Crow Met John Bull [6], Graham Smith referred to a letter
written that year by Byrd, when he was 28 years old, to segregationist
Senator Theodore Bilbo of Mississippi, in which Byrd vowed never to
fight:
"with a Negro by my side. Rather I should die a thousand times, and see
Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this
beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to
the blackest specimen from the wilds." [7]
When running for Congress in 1952, he announced, "After about a year, I
became disinterested, quit paying my dues, and dropped my membership in
the organization. During the nine years that have followed, I have
never been interested in the Klan." During this campaign, "Byrd went on
the radio to acknowledge that he belonged to the Klan from 'mid-1942 to
early 1943,' according to newspaper accounts. He explained that he had
joined 'because it offered excitement and because it was strongly
opposed to communism.' " ibid.
Byrd has also referred to his Klan membership as a mistake of his
youth. In 1997, he told an interviewer he'd encourage young people to
become involved in politics, but: "Be sure you avoid the Ku Klux Klan.
Don't get that albatross around your neck. Once you've made that
mistake, you inhibit your operations in the political arena."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Byrd
.
|
|
|
| User: "Topaz" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: A Split In the Racist Right |
20 Aug 2006 07:56:20 PM |
|
|
Here are some quotes from the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica
after the heading Ku Klux Klan:
"Ku Klux Klan, the name of an American secret association of Southern
whites united for self-protection and to oppose the Reconstruction
measures of the United States Congress"
"The various causes assigned for the origin and development of
this movement were: the absence of stable government in the South for
several years after the Civil War; the corrupt and tyrannical rule of
the alien, renegade and negro, and the belief that it was supported by
the Federal troops which controlled elections and legislative bodies;
the disfranchisement of whites; the spread of ideas of social and
political equality among the negroes; fear of negro insurrections; the
arming of negro militia and the disarming of whites; outrages upon
white women by black men"
"The constitutions and rituals of these secret orders have
declarations of principles, of which the following are characteristic:
to protect and succour the weak and unfortunate, especially the widows
and orphans of Confederate soldiers; to protect members of the white
race in life, honour and property from the encroachments of the
blacks"
"To control the negro the Klan played upon his superstitious
fears by having night patrols, parades and drills of silent horsemen
covered with white sheets, carrying skulls with coals of fire for
eyes"
"the Ku Klux movement went on until it accomplished its object by
giving protection to the whites, reducing the blacks to order,
replacing the whites in control of society and state, expelling the
worst of the carpet-baggers and scalawags, and nullifying those laws
of Congress which had resulted in placing the Southern whites under
the control of a party composed principally of ex-slaves."
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.ihr.org/
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Topaz" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: A Split In the Racist Right |
17 Aug 2006 08:33:49 PM |
|
|
by Kevin Alfred Strom
....The May 18th meeting of the
American Israel Public Affairs Committee (or AIPAC for short) in
Washington, DC... AIPAC is the most influential lobby in Washington,
and is totally focused on maintaining and increasing American taxpayer
support for Israel, both financial and military, and in destroying all
critics of Israel or of Jewish supremacism...
When Bush ascended to the AIPAC podium, flanked by leading Jewish
supremacists on both sides, behind him was a huge new flag design,
probably 50 feet long, consisting of American stars and stripes
interspersed with huge Stars of David. Bush, interrupted by wild
applause and several standing ovations from the Zionist audience which
included Ariel Sharon, referred to the leading Jewish supremacists on
the platform by their first names:
"I'm honored to be here at AIPAC, thank you for such a warm welcome.
It's good to be with so many friends-friends of mine and friends of
Israel. ...I want to thank Amy for her leadership. I appreciate you
taking time to serve a cause that-in which you believe deeply. I want
to thank Bernice for her willingness to serve, as well. I've known
Howard for a long time. He's effective. I want to thank the AIPAC
board-AIPAC board members for their friendship and leadership. I'm
honored to be in the presence of my friend, the Ambassador from
Israel, Danny Ayalon. I appreciate you being here, Danny."
How cozy. The president went on in this vein for about forty minutes,
acting more like an Israeli cabinet minister than an American
president. He congratulated himself for his unwavering support for
Zionism, justified the horrible terror-war being waged on Israel's
behalf in Iraq, and engaged in some saber-rattling against other
Muslim states that don't want to have a government supervised by Jews.
Bush also repeated the catch-phrase that has a hidden meaning to
Jewish supremacists, the phrase I've spoken about before on American
Dissident Voices-"committed to the security of Israel as a Jewish
state," which is repeated almost word-for-word again and again by
Israel's sycophants and Capitol Hill puppets. and which means much
more than seems. [ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=1282 ]
The words 'as a Jewish state' are crucial: they mean support for
Israel as a racial state for one people alone, something that the
Jewish power structure denies to every White nation-yet White
politicians must express their "commitment" to Israel. Bush stated:
"The United States is strongly committed, and I am strongly committed,
to the security of Israel as a vibrant Jewish state." Identical to the
catch-phrase, with only the addition of the word 'vibrant.' Bush is
not committed to America as an American state -- in fact, he supports
amnesty for illegal invaders.
All that is to be expected from Bush, considering his dependence on
Jewish favor, Jewish money, and Jewish media for his election. But
what I found most chilling about Bush's groveling speech before his
masters was this section, in which he makes reference to a recent
meeting of the so-called Organization for Security and Cooperation in
Europe (OSCE), which is working with American and European governments
to outlaw free speech by "monitoring" and outlawing criticism of Jews
[ http://www.natvan.com/pub/2003/053103.txt
http://www.natvan.com/pub/2003/062803.txt ]:
"The Jewish people have seen, over the years and over the centuries,
that hate prepares the way for violence. The refusal to expose and
confront intolerance can lead to crimes beyond imagining. So we have a
duty to expose and confront anti-Semitism, wherever it is found. Some
of you attended a very important event in Berlin last month, the
International Conference on Anti-Semitism. You understand that
anti-Semitism is not a problem of the past; the hatred of Jews did not
die in a Berlin bunker. In its cruder forms, it can be found in some
Arab media, and this government will continue to call upon Arab
governments to end libels and incitements. Such hatred can also take
subtler forms. The demonization of Israel, the most extreme
anti-Zionist rhetoric can be a flimsy cover for anti-Semitism, and
contribute to an atmosphere of fear in which synagogues are
desecrated, people are slandered, folks are threatened. I will
continue to call upon our friends in Europe to renounce and fight any
sign of anti-Semitism in their midst."
[ http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/05/20040518-1.html
]
You'll notice two things here: 1) Bush is conflating negative feelings
about Jews, and 'rhetoric,' with actual violent acts and a supposed
'atmosphere' that 'creates' them, thus setting the stage for the
legally-required 'monitoring' of all critics of Jewish power and the
criminalization of the free speech of these critics, and 2) the
redefinition of criticism of Israel or Zionism, making them into just
another form of so-called "anti-Semitism," so they, too, can be
'monitored' and eventually criminalized. Both of these are something
that Jewish pressure groups worldwide have been pushing hard for
recently, and Bush promised to give them exactly what they want.
Meanwhile, at yet another meeting, John Kerry, who is actually of
Jewish ancestry himself, tried to out-promise Bush with his
protestations of love for Zionism and hatred of any who would
criticize Jewish supremacism. At a meeting last month of the
crime-linked Jewish spying operation and pressure group, the
'Anti-Defamation League' (ADL) in Washington, Kerry said the
following:
"...what ADL stands for is what I would like to fight for. ...And
after last week's [OSCE] conference in Berlin, we celebrate 55
countries that came together who have pledged to intensify their
efforts to combat anti-Semitism and to spread tolerance. ...And we
still know that anti-Semitism, notwithstanding the meeting of 55
countries, has been growing, and demands global leadership in order to
stand up against it. ...Across the Atlantic we've seen a new wave of
anti-Semitism, masking as anti-Israel sentiment, and it's creeping its
way across Europe and the Middle East. ...The people of Israel should
also know that for the entire 20 years that I have been in the United
States Senate, I'm proud that my commitment to a secure Jewish state
has been unwavering; not even by one vote or one letter or one
resolution has it wavered. And as president, I can guarantee you that
that support and that effort for our ally, a vibrant democracy, will
continue. ...The security of Israel is paramount."
[ http://www.us-israel.org/jsource/US-Israel/kerryadl.html ]
Ladies and gentlemen, you cannot have more than one paramount value.
If a certain thing is your highest value, that means that all other
things are of lesser or no value. Kerry says "The security of Israel
is paramount." Not the security of the United States. Not the security
of our children's future. Not the security of Western civilization or
its founding race. None of these are paramount to Kerry, or for that
matter Bush or any of the bought politicians. The Jewish state alone
is paramount. (In one of those coincidences that is simply too funny
to have been made up, I note that Kerry's 'liaison with the Jewish
community' is a person named Jay Footlik.)
As for Ralph Nader, he himself, like Kerry, is not entirely White
(though he's not Jewish) and he cannot be expected to articulate the
interests of White Americans. He has approached Middle Eastern issues
with more objectivity than Kerry or Bush-he recently referred to Kerry
as "part of the Washington puppet show on the Israeli/Palestinian
matter"-and he would restrict some of the worst abuses of the
open-border maniacs for rational economic reasons...
[ http://www.us-israel.org/jsource/US-Israel/kerry.html ]
And what of that OSCE conference on 'anti-Semitism' to which both
Kerry and Bush referred in such glowing terms? Attended by
representatives of 55 nations, many of them dependent on US/Zionist
favor for their economic survival, it marked the agreement of those
governments to 'root out' all criticism of Jews, continue their
efforts to criminalize such criticism, and begin the most extensive
internal surveillance and spying operation ever known, to be directed
against their own citizens suspected of being aware of the issue of
Jewish supremacism.
According to the New Jersey Jewish News, at the conference "European
governments acknowledged that much of the current anti-Semitism
revival hides behind criticism of Israel. ...Several congressional
participants praised the work of the conference, but warned that the
meeting is only the first step in combating a problem that continues
to grow."
One of those US Congressmen attending the event was New Jersey's
Republican Representative Chris Smith, who said "When national leaders
fail to denounce anti-Semitic violence and slurs, the void is not only
demoralizing to the victims, but silence actually enables the
wrongdoing. Silence by elected officials in particular conveys
approval - or at least acquiescence - and can contribute to a climate
of fear and a sense of vulnerability. ...we hope the results of this
conference will serve as a blueprint for serious and hopefully bold
action. Our words here in Berlin, however, must be repeated at home
with frequency, passion, and tenacity and matched - and even exceeded
- by deeds."
Laszlo Kovacs, the foreign minister of Hungary, told the OSCE meeting
"There can be no tolerance of extremist hate speech. We will not
tolerate it in parliament, in meetings, on the streets, squares or
football stadiums." By "extremist hate speech" they now mean criticism
of Israel, Zionism, or Jewish power. They do not mean and will not
punish Jewish supremacists when they declare their hatred of White
people or others, nor will they punish the Jewish funding and
promotion of policies which are leading directly to genocide of the
European race.
Another attendee was Democratic Congressman from Maryland Ben Cardin,
who declared "We ended up with a document that acknowledges the
importance of national leadership in fighting anti-Semitism, and which
commits nations not just to gather information about the problem but
to take action based on that."
The article continues: "As a result, OSCE members will share
information on the spread of anti-Semitism and 'best practices' for
combating it. Member nations agreed to invest in educational and law
enforcement programs aimed at reducing hate crimes and to appoint a
roving OSCE envoy to help members 'develop specific strategies.'"
Jewish spokesman Mark Levin said of the OSCE meeting "The bottom line
is that members states of the OSCE are now committed to monitoring and
hopefully implementing programs to counter increasing
anti-Semitism..." Levin also said that America must also monitor and
'combat' critics of Jewish power: "It was clear we have a lot to look
at in our own backyard, including using education, law enforcement,
and the Internet to combat new forms of hatred." With every questioner
of Jewish policy now put in the 'anti-Semite' category if Jewish
groups so declare, Levin and Foxman are going to be very very busy in
the near future.
[ http://www.njjewishnews.com/njjn.com/50604/wldadl.html ]
[ http://www.eubusiness.com/afp/040523124619.zfxkfwap ]
They may have to 'monitor' the halls of Congress. In the U.S.
Senate, Senator Ernest Hollings is about to retire-and from
the secure position of never having to worry about reelection
again, Mr. Hollings has decided to come clean, at least
partially, on the nature of Jewish power in Washington. (By the
way, Hollings' designated successor has been chosen by the
Democratic Party: Inez Tenenbaum, the Democratic state education
superintendent. No more worries about South Carolina Senators
spilling the beans for a while, anyway. [
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/GuestColumns/printLondon20040525.shtml
] )
Hollings' remarks included the following: "They [the Israeli military]
are coming in there [Palestinian refugee camps] with U.S. equipment,
U.S. gun helicopters, U.S. tanks that are bulldozing. That is our
policy. That is the reason for 9/11. ...I think, frankly, we have
caused more terrorism than we have gotten rid of. ...I can tell you no
President takes office-I don't care whether it is a Republican or a
Democrat-that all of a sudden AIPAC will tell him exactly what the
policy is... I don't apologize for this column. I want them to
apologize to me for talking about anti-Semitism. They are not getting
by with it. ...Now we have killed almost 800, maimed for life
thousands of others. Are we going to just continue on?"
[ http://hollings.senate.gov/~hollings/statements/2004521A35.html
]
Good question, Senator Hollings. My question is: Why did it take you
dozens of years to tell us the truth about Jewish domination of
Washington? Other establishment figures have, perhaps reluctantly and
hesitantly, revealed the truth about who has led us into the war:
Middle East expert General Anthony Zinni has now stated that the
purpose of the war was Israel's security, and that Jewish
neocons-naming Douglas Feith, Paul Wolfowitz, Lewis Libby, Richard
Perle, and Elliot Abrams-were the ones pushing for war from the
beginning.
[ http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=13549 ]
In parallel with the OSCE efforts in Europe, Jewish efforts to
suppress criticism are right now on track to be made into law in the
US Congress: H.R.4230 is a bill to "To authorize the establishment
within the Department of State of an Office to Monitor and Combat
Anti-Semitism, to require inclusion in annual Department of State
reports of information concerning acts of anti-Semitism around the
world, and for other purposes."
The bill states that "It is the sense of Congress that-- (1) the
United States should continue to vigorously support efforts to combat
anti-Semitism worldwide through bilateral relationships and
interaction with international organizations such as the Organization
of Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE); (2) the United States
delegation to the OSCE conference in Berlin should advocate for the
appointment of a High Commissioner on anti-Semitism; (3) the President
should direct the United States Ambassador to the United Nations to
introduce in the most appropriate forum in the United Nations a
measure condemning anti-Semitism; (4) the Secretary of State should
establish a permanent office in the Department of State to monitor and
combat anti-Semitism; and (5) the Department of State should
thoroughly document acts of anti-Semitism and anti-Semitic incitement
that occur around the world."
[ http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:HR04230:@@@P ]
It does indeed seem that there are meetings, meetings everywhere -- in
Berlin, in Washington, in the halls of Congress itself. For the most
part, these are meetings of liars and faceless bureaucrats eager to
accept Jewish money and keep their jobs by doing what they are told.
Meanwhile, we're having some meetings of our own. Last month, National
Alliance members participated in the Institute for Historical Review
revisionist conference in Sacramento, which we helped rescue from
cowardice and Jewish censorship efforts. Just one week earlier, we
held the largest-ever National Alliance Leadership Conference in the
newly-constructed William Pierce Memorial Hall in the beautiful
mountains of West Virginia. And just a few days ago, the New Orleans
European-American Conference gathered together Alliance members and
supporters, members of other groups, and individual activists from
around the world to meet in cooperation in setting lofty goals,
putting in place a 'zero tolerance' policy on violence or lawlessness
often instigated by provocateurs, and distancing ourselves from
irresponsible elements by setting a high moral tone in our efforts to
secure a future for White children. The ideas in the New Orleans
Protocol, as it is called, are those that the National Alliance has
been promoting for years. The New Orleans Protocol will have historic
significance as we advance toward our vision: a nation for White
people, where the government is responsible to us alone, where our
interests-and not the interests of a foreign nation like Israel-come
first.
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.ihr.org/
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Topaz" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: A Split In the Racist Right |
17 Aug 2006 08:32:54 PM |
|
|
On 16 Aug 2006 14:50:00 -0700, "GatherNoMoss" <saints2060@yahoo.com>
wrote:
The KKK traditionally votes Democrat.
You don't mean recently do you?
Hhmmmm...which Party is it that has a former Grand Poo-ba Wizard fo
the KKK...?
Oh yeah, Democratic Sen. Byrd.
"BOTH Republicans AND Democrats are hypocrites and cowards, because
both have sold out America and the American gross domestic product
(GDP) to Israel. The United States does not exist anymore as a
sovereign entity and all our energy, all our societal efforts are
dedicated to supporting Israel first, Israel second, and Israel third.
America is a Jew-ocracy that is run for the Jews, by the Jews, and of
the Jews, because America is a Jewish owned corporation, not a
"democracy." Votes don't matter much here in the USA because
Washington runs on money, not on votes, and Democratic presidential
candidate Senator Hillary Clinton is just as sold out to the Israeli
lobby, AIPAC (the America Israel Public Affairs Committee), as
Republican presidential candidate Senator Bill Frist. Former
president Bill Clinton was sold out, Jimmy Carter was sold out and
later admitted it after he left office, Ronald Reagan was sold out,
all American presidents were sold out going back to JFK…
All our Middle East problems, our vast national debt, our collapsing
economy, and our collapsing standard of living are all directly the
result of our blind support for Israel's illegal ethnic cleansing of
Palestinians from Palestine. Bush used Israeli torture techniques on
Moslems, our leaders have let Israeli agents here in the USA illegally
spy on American citizens, we ignore UN Resolutions that tell Israel
to go retreat to their 1967 borders as international law mandates. We
routinely block the United Nations from taking action against Israel's
illegal activities. We gave Israel plutonium and helped them build
their atomic and hydrogen bombs, we shoveled Israel over 140 billion
in foreign aid since 1950, and we have wasted 3 to 4 trillion dollars
in total on the cult of Zionism since 1950 through the cost of illegal
wars, oil embargoes, foreign aid, and the cost of the strategic oil
reserve. Frankly, the Jews are bleeding America dry and no one is
courageous enough to stand up to the Jews because Jews in America are
the exact equivalent of George Orwell's BIG BROTHER. Jews tell us all
what to do, what we are allowed to think, and what we are allowed to
speak. Jews control our government, dominate our media, and crush any
opposition by slandering those with legitimate and provable complaints
as "anti-Semites."
It must be great to be above criticism and to control the stupid and
dull Christian masses and laugh at them behind their backs and even to
their faces and get no response other than more feet licking, bowing,
and kow towing. George Bush is a useful idiot, a water carrier for
the Jews just as Hillary Clinton will be if elected president. Both
Iraq wars were started for the Jews and by the Jews. All our
politicians are a disgrace and we will never regain our sovereignty,
solve our foreign policy problems, or balance our budget until we end
our slavish allegiance to the immoral, racist, murdering, torturing,
lying, stealing, manipulating cult nation of Israel.
The Holocaust business feeds the Zionist cult and Hollywood has
deified Jews while vilifying Moslems… Our nation is a lying,
hypocritical mess and the world hates us because the world knows we
are a nation of morons run by Jews. Where are the brave and honest
Americans who speak with one face, not two? Americans are defeated,
weak, foolish, and can't even speak out because they are scared like
little girls, unable to even speak the word "Jew" unless in praise or
on bended knees. Imagine if Catholics or Moonies or the Mafia had that
much control in America! Jews are not above the law and Jews can be
opposed for their real world crimes just like anyone else. Our brains
are frozen by decades of media programming and propaganda so that now
we cannot even speak the "J word." Political correctness, which was
invented by Jews as a form of mind control, prevents Americans from
being fully human. We are a nation of slaves, licking Jewish feet day
after day and we never get tired of it. It's a sad and pathetic
situation and we are a sad and pathetic people who deserve the
contempt of the world because we have no backbone and no honesty.
The United Kingdom is little better than the USA because Tony Blair is
a rabid Christian Zionist himself and most of his top advisors are
Jews. Much of Europe is sold out and controlled by Jews and the cult
of Zionism has Western leaders by the testicles, frozen and unable to
fight back. Now is the time to speak up, to fight back, and to do it
legally, responsibly, and effectively. Just decide that from now on
Jews have no special privileges in your brain and that you can
criticize Jews just like Republicans, Democrats, Catholics, Moonies,
or any other group. Jews act as a 90% unified group, commit crimes as
a 90% unified group, and control America as a 90% unified group, and
thus deserve to be criticized as a 90% unified group. Being able to
criticize those who do harm is what democracy means and is exactly
what freedom of thought means. Become a fully functioning human being
and not just another mind controlled blob of useless DNA!"
inkyblacks
"In 1976, David Duke sought a seat in the Louisiana State Senate as a
Democrat. In 1988, he ran in the Democratic Party primary for President
of the United States. After a dismal showing in the Democratic
primaries, he appeared on many state ballots as the nominee of the
Populist Party and received approximately 25,000 votes in the 1988
general election."
an interview with David Duke
by Kevin Alfred Strom
KAS: What was the reaction of the high-level people in Syria to your
visit?
David Duke: Extremely Positive. One of the most amazing aspects of
my visit was the reaction of the press. I'm used to an adversarial
press, of course, pretty much because of the influence of the Jewish
supremacists. In Syria I held a large press conference in a big
press tent in the middle of Damascus. There were probably a hundred
news people there from all over the Middle East, including about
twenty from the major national news media of the respective
countries. And this press conference was broadcast live in these
different countries. I got to explain about Jewish supremacism,
Jewish control of the American media, the attack on the U.S.S.
Liberty, and about how Israel actually made a terrorist attack
against America in the Lavon affair, which a lot of these people
aren't aware of.
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=5228 ]
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=4783 ]
So, I said, America's been a victim of both Jewish terrorism and
Jewish occupation in many of the ways that they have, and they got
to hear about this. They also got to see and hear an American who
doesn't go along with Jewish supremacism. The Syrian Press
Association-which is the official press association for that
country and it has associates all over the Middle East-came out
with an article in which they said that David Duke is the best
ambassador from the American people ever to come to Syria and the
Mideast because he has made us realize that not all Americans
support the policies of Wolfowitz, Perle, and Bush. He has shown us
that not all Americans support the Zionist terror in Israel and that
there are many Americans who support us. They may not be a majority,
but they're being manipulated, just as the Zionists try to
manipulate us here.
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=5460 ]
That was interesting to me because I didn't count on the media being
so supportive. Again, I'm used to hostile media. The representatives
of the Middle Eastern media interviewed me for an hour and a half,
and there was not one negative question. There was no mention of my
KKK involvement of thirty years ago-just a discussion of the
critical issues at hand, and it was very positive all the way
through the interview.
KAS: In addition to Syria, I know that you've engaged in outreach to
other Middle Eastern countries in the past. I find it interesting
that you, a man who is characterized as a hater of non-Whites, were
speaking in a friendly way to non-White peoples and receiving an
excellent reception from them in their countries-although you
have expressed an opposition to Islamic and Middle Eastern
immigration to Europe, the United States, and other White areas. Did
they address that issue at all, and if so, how do they feel about
that?
DD: Let me tell you an interesting fact; this is something that's
important that all of your listeners hear. Every time I've gone to
the Middle East and done public appearances I've make one thing
clear. I've made sure there's no stone left unturned because Israel
has started a hate campaign against me, telling the Arabs, "Well,
David Duke is against all the non-White, non-European people, so you
should not welcome him; instead you should spit upon him."
One of the first things I tell these people is, "I want to make
something very clear at the outset. I am a person of European
descent and I live in the United States of America. I want to
preserve the ancestral homelands of my people for my people-both
Europe and America. I want to preserve our traditions and our ethnic
heritage and I'm opposed to any non-European immigration to our
countries-just as I know you would be opposed to Europeans coming
en masse to your countries, controlling your societies, and trying
to change your religious values, traditions, or culture. So, I want
to let you know that that's what I stand for. At the same time, I am
not in favor of America or any other European country opening up
bases all over the world, oppressing your people, or supporting
Israel. We are allies in a sense, in that we both have a common
problem in the extreme danger posed by Jewish supremacism and by the
extremists who control Israel and have so much influence in the
Western world. They are a threat to you and also to us in much the
same way, and we should stand united in our opposition to them.
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=3663 ]
KAS: Well let's hope that there can be good will between different
peoples who want self-determination and feel no hostility toward
others who want the same thing.
DD: Well I think that there is such good will, and I certainly saw
it during my trip. The media in Damascus broadcast my interview and
my speech, which anybody can view on my Web site, davidduke.com.
That speech was aired on every news channel in Syria and just about
every Syrian saw it. After the broadcast, whenever I would walk in
the streets-of course, I'm pretty recognizable over there; I'm
tall and very European in appearance-everywhere I went people
would cheer for me and welcome me; it was amazing. So there is good
will now, and I hope that we can preserve it.
[ http://www.davidduke.com/ ]
There's a difference between a truly supremacist vision of life,
such as the Jews have, and what we want. We're not trying to hurt
other peoples or oppress them, and this message also helps our own
people to see the truth. When you talk to many White people about
preserving our heritage, our values, and our rights, and about
having their children grow up in a White society, they can go along
with that. They don't go along with the idea of murdering or
oppressing or exterminating other people, which, of course, is what
the Jewish media try to portray our movement as being all about.
That's why when our people act like the Hollywood stereotypes they
do a tremendous amount of damage to our cause. But when White people
see an individual who is active for White rights also befriending
people in the Middle East in a diplomatic sort of way, it basically
destroys the image that the Jewish media try to create of a "hater,"
or a "bigot"-of somebody who hates others. They realize that I am
a person just like themselves, and that the people of our cause are
decent individuals who are trying to preserve our heritage, but are
not trying to hurt other peoples.
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=5010 ]
KAS: I know that the reaction of the Jewish-controlled media here in
the West to your Syrian trip was very hostile-and they tried to
make it look like you were making anti-American speeches there.
DD: Right. In fact, I remember seeing that on CNN with Wolf Blitzer.
Wolf Blitzer-now here's a guy who's supposed to be an unbiased
newsman. He's actually a former activist for AIPAC, the American
Israel Public Affairs Committee-a group that is under
investigation right now for spying on the United States of America.
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=7091 ]
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=8084 ]
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=8085 ]
KAS: And one of the number one pro-war groups in this country.
DD: Exactly. And this is a guy who tells us about the Middle East
and tells us "David Duke blasts the U.S."? I didn't blast the U.S.
I blasted the Jewish supremacists who have subverted and hijacked
American foreign policy and led us to this disaster in the Middle
East, and I blasted the individual whom I believe has practically
committed treason against this country, George Bush.
When you send American boys into battle, you risk their lives and
they face losing their arms, their legs, their vision, and even
their ability to reproduce. When you send them into battle, you
don't send them to fight for a lie, and you don't send them to fight
for some other country's interests. You send them in only if America
and its well-being are truly threatened. And, of course, we've
learned that the reasons given for this war have been a lie. So I
see it as a great betrayal to send Americans into this war, which is
a war for Israel, rather than for American interests.
KAS: The Jewish "powers that be" have also tried to make some moves
against the university in Ukraine from which you recently earned
your doctorate. Can you tell us about that?
DD: Well, yes, that's true, and this is the first time I've talked
to your listeners since that happened. I've been quietly working
toward my doctoral degree for a long time. I made sure that every
"i" was dotted and every "t" was crossed in my studies at the
university. I took the required exams, did everything I had to do,
and defended my doctoral thesis-which had to do with the ethnic
supremacist aspect of Zionism-in the proper way before fifteen
academicians at the university. They were fifteen of the top
academicians not only at that school, but also in all of eastern
Europe. All of them were well educated and have been widely
published, not only in the academic community, but also in the
larger commercial market. And of course, I was awarded a doctorate.
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=6035 ]
The Jewish extremists are pretty upset about that. They had to admit
that everything was done properly, but they still said I should be
in prison robes rather than doctoral robes, and they said the same
thing about the president of the university, Dr. Tchokin. In fact,
Israel has demanded that Dr. Tchokin not be allowed to run for
office in Ukraine. He started a new party there called the
Conservative Party. He's a very anti-Zionist voice, a very
pro-Ukrainian, nationalistic voice, and they demanded that he not be
allowed to run for office.
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=4669 ]
That's chutzpah, when a foreign country tells you that you can't
have democratic freedoms or rights in elections. Since that time
they have also have demanded that the university be shut down, and
that all of its degrees be revoked. Well, it's kind of hard to shut
down the university; it's the largest university in Ukraine. They
have about fifty thousand students there and a beautiful, sprawling
campus with fantastic buildings on a hill in the middle of Kiev.
More people in the Ukrainian government, more members of the
Ukrainian diplomatic corps, more of the people in their bureaucracy,
their scientific community, and the other professions in Ukraine
have been educated at this university than at any other university
in the country. All of a sudden, here are these extremist Jews
saying, "Revoke the degrees of all the students." That would mean
revoking literally hundreds of thousands of degrees that have been
earned by the leading citizens of the country. But that's how evil
and oppressive these extremists are.
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=6036 ]
KAS: I understand that the university has held conferences on the
subject of Zionism. I have an article in front of me that says, "The
courageous university leadership"-it's called MAUP, which is a
Ukrainian acronym for Interregional Academy for Personnel Management
-- "said the United Nations should revoke its 1947 resolution on the
creation of a Jewish state. 'Mankind lived without the state of
Israel exactly 2,670 years, but after the second of its creation,
all the world feels a constant aggression,' they declared." So there
definitely is some conflict between the university and Zionist power
in the world.
DD: That statement was made in response to their efforts to shut
down the university and deny its President his rights. And, by the
way, my argument is not by any means for extermination of the Jewish
people. What I have said is simply that the Jewish people in Israel
can live as the other Jewish communities have historically lived
without bothering, oppressing, or imprisoning members of the Arab
community. I have no problem with Jews being in Israel; obviously
they have historically resided there. But I do have a problem with
them having created a state through terrorism, with their
terrorization of the Palestinian population, and with their jailing
and torturing of people by the tens of thousands over the years, and
with their fomenting of problems in other countries.
For instance, I truly believe that the Shi'ite-Sunni civil war now
looming in Iraq is the work of the Mossad. Only the Mossad would
bomb some of the holiest sites of Islam, and of course, the Israelis
seek this war. They destroyed the government of Saddam Hussein, but
in its place they now see something that they are beginning to view
as a big threat: a Shi'ite government that is very pro-Iran and a
refurbished, rebuilt Iraq, re-armed by America. They don't want this.
They want Iraq to be destabilized through civil war, so now they're
now trying to foment one. Now, before people begin saying, "David
Duke is loony again" or "He's just extreme. How can that be?," they
should remember that we know for a fact that Israel did precisely
the same thing in Lebanon. Moshe Sharett, the former Israeli Prime
Minister, talked about this. Israel purposely promoted bloodshed and
violence between the Christians and the Muslims in Lebanon in order
to foment civil war there. The reason why they hate Syria so much is
because Syrian forces came in-they were invited, by the way, by
the Lebanese government-and stopped the bloodshed among these
Lebanese people that had lived side-by-side for centuries. By the
way, although Syria is overwhelmingly Muslim, approximately four
million Christians, mostly of Greek descent-almost pure Greek
descent-also live there, and they and the Muslim population have
co-existed for centuries. Well, obviously it's in the interests of
the Jewish state to use the same old divide-and-conquer technique
that Stephen Steinlight has talked about. The Israelis want to see
their enemies fight each other, and I think that's what's why we see
what's going on in Iraq right now.
KAS: Did you not run an article on your website theorizing that
there was a Jewish element behind this Mohammed cartoon controversy
that began in Denmark and resulted in riots all around the world?
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=8097 ]
DD: According to Wikipedia and other sources, Fleming Rose, the
person that launched the cartoon controversy is himself of direct
Ukrainian Jewish descent. We know for a fact that he is a very close
associate of Daniel Pipes, ones of the leading and most extreme
Jewish neo-cons, as pro-Israel and as supremacist as you could
possibly imagine. Rose stayed in Pipes' home in the United States of
America.
This affair is one more example of what they try to do, and it's
also what they're doing right now in our country. I think Israel
benefited a great deal from the 9-11 attacks, and I think that in
the long run, Israel wants these attacks. They want to escalate this
international conflict, they want World War IV.
And in the process, what does that do? Well, it again takes our
attention away from the vital domestic racial issues confronting us
in our country. It also gives them an opportunity to take away our
freedoms, because we find ourselves in a wartime public speech
scenario. So you see continued destruction of our basic
constitutional rights and liberties. Our Bill of Rights is falling
by the wayside a little more every day, and these international wars
that they're trying to foment are simply a disaster for us. We saw
the same thing in the Second World War. They got us into that war
through the back door, so to speak. For years they promoted war and
they tried to provoke a Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in every way
they could. Our government engaged in many warlike acts against
Japan for the purpose of provoking this attack.
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=7110 ]
KAS: Well, if 9-11 was the Pearl Harbor of the Iraq war, do you
believe they will need another incident-another "Pearl Harbor"-
to bring on a war with Iran, which the neo-cons and the Zionists
clearly want?
DD: I don't know if they need an incident as big as 9-11, but they
do need continued pressure. They need for there to be more terrorist
acts in the West. I don't know if they themselves have to engage in
direct infiltration to promote these things or not, but I wouldn't
put anything past them.
They've done false flag operations before; it's a fact of history.
There's no denying the fact that Israel literally sent Jewish Mossad
agents to Egypt to blow up American installations, American movie
theaters, American restaurants, and American libraries. Luckily the
plot was thwarted because one of the bombs in a Jewish terrorist's
pocket blew up prematurely. So he was caught and made to talk, the
whole plot unraveled, and eventually the Israeli Defense Minister
Pinhas Lavon, had to resign. In that instance they tried to use
terrorism against America to get our country into a war against
another country-Egypt-that was innocent of any action against us.
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=5415 ]
If they had been successful, their scheme would have cost tens of
thousands of American lives and countless billions of dollars, and
would have caused the terrible injustice of war with a country that
had done nothing to harm us. And as you know, just recently, the
Israeli prime minister literally gave medals to-and praised as
heroes-these same Jewish terrorists who attacked the United
States of America, and yet there was almost no coverage of this
event in America's controlled media, and there was no outrage in the
United States Congress.
KAS: Virtually the only coverage came from the pro-White alternative
media. David, can you share with us your insight on the likelihood
of war with Iran? What insights do your Middle Eastern contacts give
you into the mind-set of the Iranians? What is Ahmadinejad looking
for and where is he going?
DD: I think Ahmadinejad is one of the most courageous, honest
overseas leaders, and I think he's smart enough to realize that
there's going to be a lot of problems for them, as well as for us,
unless Jewish extremist power in Europe and America is broken.
I did a lot of programs in the Middle East back in late October and
early November and I discussed how the Holocaust is being used as a
weapon. Of course, it was the primary weapon in the creation of
Israel and in the suppression of the Palestinian people, and there
are many revisionists who have legitimate questions about this
period of history. The Arab states and the Islamic world did well to
start challenging some of its claims. I talked about this to Nidal
Kabalan, who is Syria's leading journalist, and he later spoke with
the President of Iran. I think this may have something to do with
the statements that Ahmadinejad made just a few weeks later,
questioning different aspects of the Holocaust.
KAS: What do you think is the likelihood of war with Iran?
DD: Obviously the likelihood is high. The question is, how crazy are
these Jewish neo-cons? I think if they do launch an attack on Iran,
they'd much prefer it come from the United States rather than from
Israel, because they want to deflect their enemies from their own
country.
[ http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=7739 ]
The Iraq war, after all, deflected a lot of bombers and terrorist
targets from Israel to America. If the crazies succeed, I think it
will be disastrous, ultimately, for international Zionism. Even if
we don't invade Iran, but instead bomb their nuclear sites, for
example, the Iranians will consider that an act of all-out war. They
have a very dedicated population three times as large as Iraq's.
They've already had 250,000 people sign up to be suicide bombers,
and these people are at the ready in a suicide brigade. Iran will
send its agents all over the Middle East and all over the world to
attack Americans. They not going to just sit back and take it.
This would be a disaster, and it would also disrupt the flow of oil.
We would very likely have $200-per-barrel oil, which would probably
lead to terrible economic depression in Europe and America. It would
probably bring on the most severe worldwide depression since the
1930s.
KAS: It seems crazy for people who are at the pinnacle of power-
that is, the Jewish supremacists right now in the West-to want to
shake things up so badly, just to protect their little Zionist
colony in Israel.
DD: Well, they're between a rock and a hard place, that's their
problem. They don't want Iran to eventually acquire nuclear weapons
and be on a par with Israel, but at the same time if they launch
this war it's going to result in disaster in all the countries of
the world, and that may cause them to lose their grip on the world.
So they have a very tough decision to make.
If the crazies prevail, I think it's going to be disastrous for the
United States and disastrous for the world. However, if the cooler
heads among the Zionists prevail, they'll try to use other means-
like subversion-to take care of the problem. They may try to
cause a civil war in Iran, or foment a coup d'état there. They're
very good at that kind of thing, you know. They've been practicing
and working at it for years and I'm sure that they have people
planted in the government of Iran and in many other governments as
well; this is their forte. In that case, we won't have war; and
since the Jews have tended to learn from history, at this point I
think that the cooler heads will prevail. There's just too much risk
for them in the other scenario.
KAS: Well, whatever the case, we must continue to work to educate
our people and to work for our own self-determination. Along those
same lines, you and I were in Washington, D.C. earlier this week at
the National Archives and we stood with our hands literally within a
couple of inches of the founding document of the United States, the
Constitution. What were your thoughts on that occasion?
DD: Well, I've seen them before, and I've been that close to them
before, but every time in my life that I've seen them they've made a
deep impression on me.
Our Founding Fathers were such brilliant men, and they were also
courageous men. They stood up against the strongest power in the
world at the time. They stood on principle, and they sacrificed.
Most who participated in the American Revolution died paupers.
It amazes me that the same issues exist today, except that they are
perhaps even more serious. For instance, our country was founded on
the principle of independence, on the idea that as a nation and a
culture we have a right to a government dedicated to "ourselves and
to our posterity." We have a right to our independence, to be free
of control by any foreign people. The people of the United States
then, of course, had been controlled by the British, who are
basically our people. Most of the American people then were of
British descent. But we still felt that we had our own life here in
America, we had the right to run our own affairs and to have those
affairs determined by what's good for our people here.
Of course, today we have a situation in which a foreign nation that
is absolutely opposed to the fundamental precepts of what America is
all about, to what our forefathers believed in, and to our values,
is in control of our mass media and in control of many aspects of
our government-certainly of our foreign policy. That makes it
contemporary for me.
And the principles of our Declaration of Independence apply to other
nations as well. They apply to the Iraqis, who have a right to their
independence under Saddam Hussein or whomever else they may choose
as their leaders. They apply to Iran and to Syria, to Israel, and to
any other country. For us to try to make things otherwise is a
terrible mistake; it gets us involved in these foreign conflicts.
Secondly, seeing these documents and the Constitution of the United
States again, I'm reminded of the founding of our country and how
much it's been subverted since those days. As we all know, the
Preamble to the Constitution of the United States says very clearly
that these principles are for "ourselves and our posterity." That's
our posterity. These men were talking about their own posterity. And
of course, whether or not our posterity will survive is in question.
We're being ethnically cleansed in our own country. Through the
differential birthrate, racial mixing, and massive immigration we
are literally becoming fewer and fewer in number and eventually
we'll be completely under the control-political, social,
economic, and cultural-of people who are not of our kind.
I also looked at the Bill of Rights while we were there, and
remembered that one of the very first laws that the framers of our
Constitution wrote limited immigration to the United States to
people of European heritage. So we know what this country was
founded on, and even though the media always call people like you
and me "un-American," we know that we are the authentic Americans.
One final thing I thought of when I considered how our country has
been subverted again, were the remarks that Mr. Neal Gabler made in
a documentary about Jewish media control (I quote him in my book
Jewish Supremacism). In that documentary he said, in approximately
these words, that the eastern European Jews who came to America-
people who were not allowed in many precincts of the old America-
literally changed America through control of our media-changed it
to their point of view, to their values, and to their issues.
He's Jewish himself, and his own words were "they devoured the old
America." In its place they created a new America of their own
design, in which they were the leaders; and he said that the Jews
subverted the values of this country in many of whose precincts they
formerly hadn't even been allowed.
Well, in my group, EURO, and in your group, National Vanguard, we
have a task. In our Web sites and our writings, and in our work, we
have an absolutely vital task ahead of us. We must get back control
over our own country, over our culture, our press, our media, and
truthfully, over our very hearts and souls.
Each of us has an individual battle in that way because all of us
are touched and affected by this virus that is among us-this
destructive, negative culture that the Jews have dumped upon us. We
must struggle to regain control of our lives, our heritage, and
eventually our country and our media, and unless we do this, unless
we have the courage and we acquire the ability and the knowledge to
regain control, unless we have the passion and the love that it's
going to take-it takes great love to make great sacrifices-we
will be lost forever and all the tears and dreams of our forefathers
will have been in vain. That's our task. I am committed, I am
dedicated to that task, and I believe that you are too.
KAS: Well, David, on the façade of the National Archives building,
which is a beautiful, almost Olympian structure in federal
Washington, are graven some words which I will quote, "The Heritage
of the Past is the Seed that Brings Forth the Harvest of the
Future." I want to thank you for working for the preservation and
the advancement of that precious heritage over these many years and
I want to thank you for your work as an ambassador for peace from
our people to the other peoples of the world. I look forward to your
work this year and in the decades to come, and I also want to thank
you for being a guest again on American Dissident Voices.
DD: Thank you, Kevin, and I look forward to being with you again soon.
TO SUBSCRIBE use:
advlist-join@nationalvanguard.com
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.ihr.org/
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dan Kimmel" |
|
| Title: Re: A Split In the Racist Right |
16 Aug 2006 08:41:03 PM |
|
|
Fascinating. Where we know where mordac, Fig, Freddy, Miles, and roedy will
come out. (Happy, Milles? I didn't forget to include you among the
haters.)
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:8r27e2lnvtcc2ckddoqb3i4jm7nv7oqn73@4ax.com...
http://www.alternet.org/story/40343/
August 16, 2006
A Split In the Racist Right
By Heidi Beirich and Mark Potok, Intelligence Report. Posted
A rift has opened between those who see blacks, Hispanics and Muslims
as the primary enemy, and those who blame Jews for every evil.
For a gathering of people devoted to denouncing the inferiority of
blacks and sounding the alarm about civilization-threatening Muslims,
the biannual conferences thrown by the New Century Foundation,
publisher of the racist newsletter American Renaissance, are decidedly
genteel affairs.
Men dress in suits and ties, women in formal business attire, and
there are no uniformed skinheads or Klansmen to be seen.
Large plasma television screens, Starbucks coffee spreads and fancy
linens adorn the hotel meeting hall.
Epithets have no place here.
Or at least they didn't.
At the latest edition of the conferences that began in 1994, held this
February at the Hyatt Dulles hotel, a nasty spat broke out that upset
the gathering's decorum -- and may even shape the future of the
radical right.
It began when David Duke, the former Klan leader and author of Jewish
Supremacism, strode to a microphone after French author Guillaume Faye
wrapped up a talk vilifying Muslims entitled "The Threat to the West."
Duke thanked Faye for remarks that "touched my genes."
But then he went one further.
"There is a power in the world that dominates our media, influences
our government and that has led to the internal destruction of our
will and spirit," Duke said, according to an undisputed account in The
Forward newspaper.
"Tell us, tell us," someone in the back yelled.
"I'm not going to say it," Duke replied.
Laughter began to fill the room, until a short, angry man leaped from
his seat, walked up to Duke and began to curse.
"You fucking Nazi, you've disgraced this meeting!" he said.
And with that, Michael Hart, a Jewish astrophysicist and long-time
attendee at American Renaissance conferences, headed for the door.
As many as 50 people at the conference began to jeer and point at the
rapidly disappearing Hart.
This extraordinary incident marked the beginning of an open rift
between those on the radical right who see blacks, Hispanics and
Muslims as the primary enemy, and those who say "the Jews" are
ultimately behind every evil -- a split that has usually stayed just
below the surface but now threatens a leading institution of American
extremism.
While in the past he has managed to bridge this divide mainly by
ignoring it, American Renaissance founder Jared Taylor now must
finally come to terms with the split.
His dilemma boils down to this:
Throw out the anti-Semites and try to build a larger movement with
electoral possibilities like those increasingly seen in Britain and
Germany;
or openly join hands with the very energetic neo-Nazis, even though
that means the loss of any remaining shred of respectability.
"These are the makings of a major schism," wrote Shawn Mercer,
co-founder and moderator of American Renaissance's AR List, an E-mail
group.
"If American Renaissance ultimately fails as a result of this
donnybrook at the convention, it will be a sad, possibly fatal turn of
events for the future of whites."
________________________________________________________
Harry
.
|
|
|
| User: "ouroboros rex" |
|
| Title: Re: A Split In the Racist Right |
17 Aug 2006 11:42:57 AM |
|
|
"Dan Kimmel" <daniel.kimmel@rcn.com> wrote in message
news:_ZSdnTnHeLJuVH7ZnZ2dnUVZ_u6dnZ2d@rcn.net...
Fascinating. Where we know where mordac, Fig, Freddy, Miles, and roedy
will
come out. (Happy, Milles? I didn't forget to include you among the
haters.)
cuckoo cuckoo cuckoo
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:8r27e2lnvtcc2ckddoqb3i4jm7nv7oqn73@4ax.com...
http://www.alternet.org/story/40343/
August 16, 2006
A Split In the Racist Right
By Heidi Beirich and Mark Potok, Intelligence Report. Posted
A rift has opened between those who see blacks, Hispanics and Muslims
as the primary enemy, and those who blame Jews for every evil.
For a gathering of people devoted to denouncing the inferiority of
blacks and sounding the alarm about civilization-threatening Muslims,
the biannual conferences thrown by the New Century Foundation,
publisher of the racist newsletter American Renaissance, are decidedly
genteel affairs.
Men dress in suits and ties, women in formal business attire, and
there are no uniformed skinheads or Klansmen to be seen.
Large plasma television screens, Starbucks coffee spreads and fancy
linens adorn the hotel meeting hall.
Epithets have no place here.
Or at least they didn't.
At the latest edition of the conferences that began in 1994, held this
February at the Hyatt Dulles hotel, a nasty spat broke out that upset
the gathering's decorum -- and may even shape the future of the
radical right.
It began when David Duke, the former Klan leader and author of Jewish
Supremacism, strode to a microphone after French author Guillaume Faye
wrapped up a talk vilifying Muslims entitled "The Threat to the West."
Duke thanked Faye for remarks that "touched my genes."
But then he went one further.
"There is a power in the world that dominates our media, influences
our government and that has led to the internal destruction of our
will and spirit," Duke said, according to an undisputed account in The
Forward newspaper.
"Tell us, tell us," someone in the back yelled.
"I'm not going to say it," Duke replied.
Laughter began to fill the room, until a short, angry man leaped from
his seat, walked up to Duke and began to curse.
"You fucking Nazi, you've disgraced this meeting!" he said.
And with that, Michael Hart, a Jewish astrophysicist and long-time
attendee at American Renaissance conferences, headed for the door.
As many as 50 people at the conference began to jeer and point at the
rapidly disappearing Hart.
This extraordinary incident marked the beginning of an open rift
between those on the radical right who see blacks, Hispanics and
Muslims as the primary enemy, and those who say "the Jews" are
ultimately behind every evil -- a split that has usually stayed just
below the surface but now threatens a leading institution of American
extremism.
While in the past he has managed to bridge this divide mainly by
ignoring it, American Renaissance founder Jared Taylor now must
finally come to terms with the split.
His dilemma boils down to this:
Throw out the anti-Semites and try to build a larger movement with
electoral possibilities like those increasingly seen in Britain and
Germany;
or openly join hands with the very energetic neo-Nazis, even though
that means the loss of any remaining shred of respectability.
"These are the makings of a major schism," wrote Shawn Mercer,
co-founder and moderator of American Renaissance's AR List, an E-mail
group.
"If American Renaissance ultimately fails as a result of this
donnybrook at the convention, it will be a sad, possibly fatal turn of
events for the future of whites."
________________________________________________________
Harry
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dan Kimmel" |
|
| Title: Re: A Split In the Racist Right |
17 Aug 2006 12:04:35 PM |
|
|
"ouroboros rex" <c-bee1@NOSPUMMYitg.uiuc.edu> wrote in message
news:ec26ah$th4$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu...
"Dan Kimmel" <daniel.kimmel@rcn.com> wrote in message
news:_ZSdnTnHeLJuVH7ZnZ2dnUVZ_u6dnZ2d@rcn.net...
Fascinating. Well we know where mordac, Fig, Freddy, Miles, and roedy
will
come out. (Happy, Milles? I didn't forget to include you among the
haters.)
cuckoo cuckoo cuckoo
No need to sign your post three times. And you ought to include a message
as well.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: A Split In the Racist Right |
17 Aug 2006 09:32:21 PM |
|
|
"ouroboros rex" <c-bee1@NOSPUMMYitg.uiuc.edu> wrote:
"Dan Kimmel" <daniel.kimmel@rcn.com> wrote in message
news:_ZSdnTnHeLJuVH7ZnZ2dnUVZ_u6dnZ2d@rcn.net...
Fascinating. Where we know where mordac, Fig, Freddy, Miles, and roedy
will come out. (Happy, Milles? I didn't forget to include you among the
haters.)
cuckoo cuckoo cuckoo
The guy defends Israeli terrorists.
---
Blow up Glenn Canyon Dam.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky" |
|
| Title: Re: A Split In the Racist Right |
20 Aug 2006 10:09:32 PM |
|
|
Harry Hope wrote:
http://www.alternet.org/story/40343/
August 16, 2006
A Split In the Racist Right
By Heidi Beirich and Mark Potok, Intelligence Report. Posted
A rift has opened between those who see blacks, Hispanics and Muslims
as the primary enemy, and those who blame Jews for every evil.
For a gathering of people devoted to denouncing the inferiority of
blacks and sounding the alarm about civilization-threatening Muslims,
the biannual conferences thrown by the New Century Foundation,
publisher of the racist newsletter American Renaissance, are decidedly
genteel affairs.
Men dress in suits and ties, women in formal business attire, and
there are no uniformed skinheads or Klansmen to be seen.
Large plasma television screens, Starbucks coffee spreads and fancy
linens adorn the hotel meeting hall.
Epithets have no place here.
Or at least they didn't.
At the latest edition of the conferences that began in 1994, held this
February at the Hyatt Dulles hotel, a nasty spat broke out that upset
the gathering's decorum -- and may even shape the future of the
radical right.
It began when David Duke, the former Klan leader and author of Jewish
REPUBLICON David Duke.
Supremacism, strode to a microphone after French author Guillaume Faye
wrapped up a talk vilifying Muslims entitled "The Threat to the West."
Duke thanked Faye for remarks that "touched my genes."
But then he went one further.
"There is a power in the world that dominates our media, influences
our government and that has led to the internal destruction of our
will and spirit," Duke said, according to an undisputed account in The
Forward newspaper.
"Tell us, tell us," someone in the back yelled.
"I'm not going to say it," Duke replied.
Laughter began to fill the room, until a short, angry man leaped from
his seat, walked up to Duke and began to curse.
"You fucking Nazi, you've disgraced this meeting!" he said.
And with that, Michael Hart, a Jewish astrophysicist and long-time
attendee at American Renaissance conferences, headed for the door.
As many as 50 people at the conference began to jeer and point at the
rapidly disappearing Hart.
This extraordinary incident marked the beginning of an open rift
between those on the radical right who see blacks, Hispanics and
Muslims as the primary enemy, and those who say "the Jews" are
ultimately behind every evil -- a split that has usually stayed just
below the surface but now threatens a leading institution of American
extremism.
While in the past he has managed to bridge this divide mainly by
ignoring it, American Renaissance founder Jared Taylor now must
finally come to terms with the split.
His dilemma boils down to this:
Throw out the anti-Semites and try to build a larger movement with
electoral possibilities like those increasingly seen in Britain and
Germany;
or openly join hands with the very energetic neo-Nazis, even though
that means the loss of any remaining shred of respectability.
"These are the makings of a major schism," wrote Shawn Mercer,
co-founder and moderator of American Renaissance's AR List, an E-mail
group.
"If American Renaissance ultimately fails as a result of this
donnybrook at the convention, it will be a sad, possibly fatal turn of
events for the future of whites."
________________________________________________________
Harry
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: A Split In the Racist Right |
21 Aug 2006 11:45:19 AM |
|
|
Rich Travsky <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:
Harry Hope wrote:
http://www.alternet.org/story/40343/
A Split In the Racist Right
It began when David Duke, the former Klan leader and author of Jewish
REPUBLICON David Duke.
Who could have easily won the Governorship. Now we have a mass
murdering terrorist in the White House who's 1000 times worse than
David Duke.
---
"I've stood with President Bush in the war on terrorism."
Minnesota Representative Mark Kennedy, baby killing traitor.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "john" |
|
| Title: Re: A Split In the Racist Right |
16 Aug 2006 09:10:36 PM |
|
|
Harry Hope wrote:
http://www.alternet.org/story/40343/
August 16, 2006
A Split In the Racist Right
snip
I feel the argument is incorrectly defined.
we hate not any group. However! Multiculturalism leads to disunity and
provides a potential to divide and conquer. The politicians are cleaver
in devising methods of disunity in the US.
Let each culture live in his own Country and not be at odds with his
neighbors.
They are not coming to America these days to become Americans. They are
coming to enjoy the economic situation afforded here but they want to
use this advantage to establish their cultures over Americans' way of life.
They have been too successful in eliminating our freedoms and bringing
terrorism and causing the police state, to control the conflict, they
bring already.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: A Split In the Racist Right |
17 Aug 2006 10:01:52 AM |
|
|
john <@global.net> wrote:
Harry Hope wrote:
http://www.alternet.org/story/40343/
August 16, 2006
A Split In the Racist Right
I feel the argument is incorrectly defined. we hate not any group.
Just gays, women, blacks, Mexicans, Arabs, anyone with intelligence.
---
Blow up Glenn Canyon Dam.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky" |
|
| Title: Re: A Split In the Racist Right |
17 Aug 2006 09:18:50 AM |
|
|
john wrote:
Harry Hope wrote:
http://www.alternet.org/story/40343/
August 16, 2006
A Split In the Racist Right
snip
I feel the argument is incorrectly defined.
we hate not any group. However! Multiculturalism leads to disunity and
Yes, Saint Patrick's Day has all but destroyed this country...
provides a potential to divide and conquer. The politicians are cleaver
in devising methods of disunity in the US.
"cleaver"..."disunity" ;)
Let each culture live in his own Country and not be at odds with his
neighbors.
They are not coming to America these days to become Americans. They are
coming to enjoy the economic situation afforded here but they want to
use this advantage to establish their cultures over Americans' way of life.
They have been too successful in eliminating our freedoms and bringing
terrorism and causing the police state, to control the conflict, they
bring already.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
