Agents Get Prison for Wounding a Smuggler
The border officers were doing their job, backers say. The two had tried

cover up the shooting.

Agents Get Prison for Wounding a Smuggler
The border officers were doing their job, backers say. The two had tried
to
cover up the shooting.
By Miguel Bustillo, Times Staff Writer
October 20, 2006


EL PASO, Texas - Two U.S. Border Patrol agents were watching the Mexican
boundary last year when they stopped a van carrying 743 pounds of
marijuana.
The driver fled back across the Rio Grande - with a gunshot wound in his
buttocks.

Federal prosecutors convinced a jury in March that the agents had shot a
defenseless man and schemed to cover it up. Much of the evidence against
them came from the drug runner, Osvaldo Aldrete-Davila, who reported the
shooting to a friend at the Border Patrol in Arizona. Aldrete-Davila was
given immunity from prosecution by the U.S. attorney's office.


On Thursday, the agents - Ignacio "Nacho" Ramos and Jose Alonso Compean -
were sentenced to 11 years and 12 years, respectively, for offenses that
included violating the smuggler's civil rights. Outraged supporters and
anguished family members packed the courtroom, and many wept as the
sentences were announced.

Outside the courthouse, members of the Minuteman Project, a group that
opposes illegal immigration, carried "Free Nacho" placards. "I'm just
happy
to be going home to my family tonight," Ramos said as he left the
courtroom,
surrounded by his attorneys and relatives. U.S. District Judge Kathleen
Cardone agreed to let the men remain free until January, when they must
report to prison.

The case has become a cause celebre among activists against illegal
immigration and advocates of stronger border security, who say it
epitomizes
misplaced priorities of federal prosecutors as well as the predicament of
Border Patrol agents, who must fight heavily armed criminals with little
or
no force. Among the rules broken by the agents, supporters note, was a
policy forbidding agents from chasing suspected drug smugglers without
permission from supervisors.

After Ramos and Compean were convicted, members of Congress demanded a
review of the case; tens of thousands of people signed a petition
supporting
the agents and the efforts of the Border Patrol, which is vastly outgunned
in its battle against narcotics cartels and human smuggling rings.

But Walter Boyaki, an attorney representing the smuggler, commended
federal
prosecutors for having the courage to carry on with a politically
unpopular
case, and argued that if the agents had not been punished, it would have
"put a bull's-eye on every illegal alien."

The agents were convicted of assault with a dangerous weapon and defacing
a
crime scene as well as violating Aldrete-Davila's rights. One of the
charges
against both agents, using a firearm in the commission of a felony,
carried
a mandatory 10-year term. Although only one shot struck Aldrete-Davila,
both
agents fired. Lawyers for the agents successfully sought reduced sentences
for the other counts, arguing that the men had solid records before the
shooting. Cardone gave Compean a longer sentence because she found him
more
culpable. She did not explain why.

"He's a good man who did his job," said Compean's attorney, Chris
Antcliff.
"What's got people so upset is the draconian punishment in this case."

Added Andy Ramirez, head of Friends of the Border Patrol, a California
group
that has rallied support for the agents: "Why are they trying to protect
this dope smuggler so badly? Why are they ruining the lives of two agents
for doing their job?"

Federal prosecutors say the facts - including evidence that Ramos and
Compean did not report the Feb. 17, 2005, shooting near Fabens, Texas, to
their superiors - clearly warranted a tough prosecution. They say
illegal-immigration opponents have spread lies and half-truths in a
calculated campaign to turn the agents into martyrs.

"Federal agents do not get to shoot unarmed people as they are running
away
in the back and then lie about it and cover it up," said Johnny Sutton,
U.S.
attorney for Texas' Western District. "It is very important for border
agents to follow the laws they enforce, and in those rare instances where
they do not do that, it is our job to bring them to justice."

Ramos and Compean said they had scuffled with Aldrete-Davila and he
appeared
to be holding a gun. Aldrete-Davila said he was unarmed and had held up
his
hands in surrender; he said he fled only after Compean tried to beat him
with the end of his shotgun.

As he ran toward the Rio Grande, Aldrete-Davila said, he felt a sharp
sting
and fell. When he touched his backside, he said, his hand came away
bloody,
and he limped back to Mexico. Ballistics experts matched the bullet
extracted from Aldrete-Davila's buttocks to Ramos' handgun.

He has sued the federal government for $5 million, claiming he was
permanently injured.

The agents' description about what had occurred was contradicted by other
agents who arrived on the scene. One testified that Compean had admitted
to
picking up shotgun casings to cover up the fact that he fired at the
smuggler.

After the trial, three jurors gave sworn statements that they felt
pressure
to convict, not understanding a hung jury was possible. Attorneys for the
agents sought a new trial before the sentencing, but their request was
denied. They plan to appeal.

http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/front/la-na-agents20oct20,1,1213287.story?coll=la-headlines-frontpage