Al-Zarqawi versus Bin Laden



 Politics > Politics-USA > Al-Zarqawi versus Bin Laden

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: "grinder"
Date: 09 Jun 2006 09:32:38 AM
Object: Al-Zarqawi versus Bin Laden
I guess Bin Laden is not considered a threat anymore.
"Over the past several years no single person on this planet has had the
blood of more innocent men, women and children on his hands," Rumsfeld said
at a meeting of NATO ministers in Brussels.
House Majority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, declared, "Americans are safer
today."
Frist and Scarborough called Zarqawi the number ONE terrorist in the world.
.

User: "Lone Ranger"

Title: Re: Al-Zarqawi versus Bin Laden 22 Jun 2006 12:10:43 PM
On Fri, 09 Jun 2006 14:32:38 GMT, "grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid>
wrote:

I guess Bin Laden is not considered a threat anymore.

Remember this one?
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020313-8.html
Q: Mr. President, in your speeches now you rarely talk or mention
Osama bin Laden. Why is that? Also, can you tell the American people
if you have any more information, if you know if he is dead or alive?
THE PRESIDENT: Deep in my heart I know the man is on the run, if
he's alive at all. Who knows if he's hiding in some cave or not; we
haven't heard from him in a long time. And the idea of focusing on
one person is - really indicates to me people don't understand the
scope of the mission.
So I don't know where he is. You know, I just don't spend that much
time on him, Kelly, to be honest with you.
Q: But don't you believe that the threat that bin Laden posed won't
truly be eliminated until he is found either dead or alive?
THE PRESIDENT: Well, as I say, we haven't heard much from him.
And I wouldn't necessarily say he's at the center of any command
structure. And, again, I don't know where he is. I - I'll repeat
what I said. I truly am not that concerned about him.
--
Hi-Yo, Silver! Away!
--
The Curse of Tecumseh
http://www.snopes.com/history/american/curse.htm
.

User: "Paul Revere"

Title: Re: Al-Zarqawi versus Bin Laden 09 Jun 2006 10:44:12 AM
On Fri, 9 Jun 2006 07:32:38 -0700, grinder wrote
(in article <aEfig.11047$921.2194@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net>):

I guess Bin Laden is not considered a threat anymore.

"Over the past several years no single person on this planet has had the
blood of more innocent men, women and children on his hands," Rumsfeld said
at a meeting of NATO ministers in Brussels.

Unless one counts the number of innocent Iraqi men, women, and children
killed in Bush's War as a result of orders issued by Bush.

House Majority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, declared, "Americans are safer
today."

Frist and Scarborough called Zarqawi the number ONE terrorist in the world.


.
User: ""

Title: Re: Al-Zarqawi versus Bin Laden 09 Jun 2006 09:55:37 AM
Paul Revere wrote:

On Fri, 9 Jun 2006 07:32:38 -0700, grinder wrote
(in article <aEfig.11047$921.2194@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net>):

I guess Bin Laden is not considered a threat anymore.

"Over the past several years no single person on this planet has had the
blood of more innocent men, women and children on his hands," Rumsfeld said
at a meeting of NATO ministers in Brussels.


Unless one counts the number of innocent Iraqi men, women, and children
killed in Bush's War as a result of orders issued by Bush.

Your buddies the insurgents are responsible for those deaths. Try not
to cry :)


House Majority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, declared, "Americans are safer
today."

Frist and Scarborough called Zarqawi the number ONE terrorist in the world.


.
User: "15 years to get Zarqawi"

Title: Re: Al-Zarqawi versus Bin Laden 09 Jun 2006 07:03:54 PM
<omarenoryt@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1149864937.735714.258870@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

Paul Revere wrote:

On Fri, 9 Jun 2006 07:32:38 -0700, grinder wrote
(in article <aEfig.11047$921.2194@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net>):

I guess Bin Laden is not considered a threat anymore.

"Over the past several years no single person on this planet has had
the
blood of more innocent men, women and children on his hands," Rumsfeld
said
at a meeting of NATO ministers in Brussels.


Unless one counts the number of innocent Iraqi men, women, and children
killed in Bush's War as a result of orders issued by Bush.


Your buddies the insurgents are responsible for those deaths. Try not
to cry :)

Insurgeants started the War in Iraq? Or Bush?
Do you get the news in your cave, Osama bin Omarenoryt?
.
User: "Jerry Okamura"

Title: Re: Al-Zarqawi versus Bin Laden 10 Jun 2006 03:42:43 PM
"15 years to get Zarqawi" <throwshit@bush.net> wrote in message
news:K%nig.21853$VE1.8839@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...


<omarenoryt@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1149864937.735714.258870@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

Paul Revere wrote:

On Fri, 9 Jun 2006 07:32:38 -0700, grinder wrote
(in article <aEfig.11047$921.2194@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net>):

I guess Bin Laden is not considered a threat anymore.

"Over the past several years no single person on this planet has had
the
blood of more innocent men, women and children on his hands," Rumsfeld
said
at a meeting of NATO ministers in Brussels.


Unless one counts the number of innocent Iraqi men, women, and children
killed in Bush's War as a result of orders issued by Bush.


Your buddies the insurgents are responsible for those deaths. Try not
to cry :)


Insurgeants started the War in Iraq? Or Bush?
Do you get the news in your cave, Osama bin Omarenoryt?

No, but they sure are continuing the war.
.
User: "Paul Revere"

Title: Re: Al-Zarqawi versus Bin Laden 12 Jun 2006 08:49:26 AM
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 13:42:43 -0700, Jerry Okamura wrote
(in article <79Gig.10215$Z67.7048@tornado.socal.rr.com>):


"15 years to get Zarqawi" <throwshit@bush.net> wrote in message
news:K%nig.21853$VE1.8839@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...


<omarenoryt@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1149864937.735714.258870@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

Paul Revere wrote:

On Fri, 9 Jun 2006 07:32:38 -0700, grinder wrote
(in article <aEfig.11047$921.2194@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net>):

I guess Bin Laden is not considered a threat anymore.

"Over the past several years no single person on this planet has had
the
blood of more innocent men, women and children on his hands," Rumsfeld
said
at a meeting of NATO ministers in Brussels.


Unless one counts the number of innocent Iraqi men, women, and children
killed in Bush's War as a result of orders issued by Bush.


Your buddies the insurgents are responsible for those deaths. Try not
to cry :)


Insurgeants started the War in Iraq? Or Bush?
Do you get the news in your cave, Osama bin Omarenoryt?


No, but they sure are continuing the war.


Those dirty bastards, continuing the war Bush started (otherwise known as
FIGHTING BACK).
.
User: "Jerry Okamura"

Title: Re: Al-Zarqawi versus Bin Laden 12 Jun 2006 01:18:25 PM
"Paul Revere" <Zero@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:0001HW.C0B2BEF60003A901F02845B0@news.east.cox.net...

On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 13:42:43 -0700, Jerry Okamura wrote
(in article <79Gig.10215$Z67.7048@tornado.socal.rr.com>):


"15 years to get Zarqawi" <throwshit@bush.net> wrote in message
news:K%nig.21853$VE1.8839@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...


<omarenoryt@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1149864937.735714.258870@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

Paul Revere wrote:

On Fri, 9 Jun 2006 07:32:38 -0700, grinder wrote
(in article <aEfig.11047$921.2194@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net>):

I guess Bin Laden is not considered a threat anymore.

"Over the past several years no single person on this planet has had
the
blood of more innocent men, women and children on his hands,"
Rumsfeld
said
at a meeting of NATO ministers in Brussels.


Unless one counts the number of innocent Iraqi men, women, and
children
killed in Bush's War as a result of orders issued by Bush.


Your buddies the insurgents are responsible for those deaths. Try not
to cry :)


Insurgeants started the War in Iraq? Or Bush?
Do you get the news in your cave, Osama bin Omarenoryt?


No, but they sure are continuing the war.



Those dirty bastards, continuing the war Bush started (otherwise known as
FIGHTING BACK).

Yep. A lesson from the German playbook.
.




User: "needledik doesnt have a canadian clue"

Title: Re: Al-Zarqawi versus Bin Laden 10 Jun 2006 01:33:17 AM
<omarsexual@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1149864937.735714.258870@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

Paul Revere wrote:

On Fri, 9 Jun 2006 07:32:38 -0700, grinder wrote
(in article <aEfig.11047$921.2194@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net>):

I guess Bin Laden is not considered a threat anymore.

"Over the past several years no single person on this planet has had

the

blood of more innocent men, women and children on his hands," Rumsfeld

said

at a meeting of NATO ministers in Brussels.


Unless one counts the number of innocent Iraqi men, women, and children
killed in Bush's War as a result of orders issued by Bush.


Your buddies the insurgents are responsible for those deaths. Try not
to cry :)

Interesting bogus accusation, coming from a creature named "omar."
.

User: "Paul Revere"

Title: Re: Al-Zarqawi versus Bin Laden 12 Jun 2006 08:53:33 AM
On Fri, 9 Jun 2006 07:55:37 -0700,
wrote
(in article <1149864937.735714.258870@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>):

Paul Revere wrote:

On Fri, 9 Jun 2006 07:32:38 -0700, grinder wrote
(in article <aEfig.11047$921.2194@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net>):

I guess Bin Laden is not considered a threat anymore.

"Over the past several years no single person on this planet has had the
blood of more innocent men, women and children on his hands," Rumsfeld said
at a meeting of NATO ministers in Brussels.


Unless one counts the number of innocent Iraqi men, women, and children
killed in Bush's War as a result of orders issued by Bush.


Your buddies the insurgents are responsible for those deaths. Try not
to cry :)

Your response reveals a level of ignorance known to be resistant to logic or
reason, so I will cast neither before you.


House Majority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, declared, "Americans are safer
today."

Frist and Scarborough called Zarqawi the number ONE terrorist in the
world.



.




  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER