http://rudepundit.blogspot.com/2006/01/alito-tears-oh-sweet-martha-ann.html
1/12/2006
Alito Tears:
Oh, sweet Martha-Ann Bomgardner, you who would not take the name of
Alito as your own, come over here and dry your tears on the Rude
Pundit's shoulder. Yes, yes, it is a shame that Sammy had to endure
such harsh questions in his hearing, questions like "What do you
think?" and "Did you mean it when you said?" and "Why did you do
that?" It's so sad, isn't it, that big mean Ted Kennedy wanted to know
why Sammy joined the Concerned Alumni of Princeton.
Shhhh, dear Martha-Ann, we all know that you sign up for groups to pad
the resume', and, with Sammy applying for a job with the Meese Justice
Department, any extra right wing padding would be welcomed. Hell, back
in high school, the Rude Pundit briefly belonged to the 4-H Club so he
could put it on his college apps. Then he realized he'd have to touch
goats and chickens. And when Lindsay Graham sarcastically asked if
Sammy was a "closet bigot," well, who could hold back the floodgates
for all the implication? It's brutal, the Rude Pundit knows.
Aww, you cry so deliciously, poor Martha-Ann. The Rude Pundit bets
that you cry more bravely than that ten-year old girl when she was
strip-searched by cops as they probed her ten-year old vagina and *****
for packets of drugs. The Rude Pundit bets that you cry more loudly
than that retarded guy whose co-workers sodomized him with a broom
handle. The Rude Pundit bets that the tears of everyone ever affected
by your husband's decisions now and in the future pale in comparison
to the tears that streak you face right now.
Hush, Martha-Ann, and let the Rude Pundit comfort you. Let the Rude
Pundit love you and make love to you. Cry again when you come. And if
you should get pregnant, remember that your husband isn't on the
Supreme Court yet.
.
|
|
| User: "John Doe" |
|
| Title: Re: Alito Tears |
13 Jan 2006 01:29:13 AM |
|
|
Anybody listening to the Samuel Alito confirmation hearings should
be very impressed. Listening to the massive amount of praise he
received from the American Bar Association staff and all of his
federal appeals court colleague judges, you'd think he would have
ascended into heaven by now.
Moral degenerate liberals want the other side to be saints and then
they complain when their opposition acts holy. They demand saints
and they get them. That's funny, hopefully it won't turn tragic.
A troll who probably has something against Italians and/or is a
feminist ***** kissing scumbag liberal.
EB <nom il.com> wrote:
Path: newssvr25.news.prodigy.net!newsdbm05.news.prodigy.com!newsdbm04.news.prodigy.com!newsdst01.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.io.com!news.io.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:42:44 -0600
From: EB <nom il.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.republicans,alt.impeach.bush,alt.politics.usa,alt.politics.democrats.d,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics
Subject: Alito Tears
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:42:45 -0600
Message-ID: <qsbes1hj4mia52npnd46muqp9c8j9rev3c 4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 2.0/32.652
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 36
NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.224.83.172
X-Trace: sv3-fyV1SdGfJ7HB8X+6E9ouBLyeLzZodzBupVI/Fpj350kRbaPsj4cR4RGo503sRKfQo8D7MQS/e7jEjKw!5YBNUCzVH577OX27MnQEoU9UmqspC2g3EYeI/LnryKL/MyJo70dzT20q4nQW+t2UBn/Axr4PvIFq!wkqe
X-Complaints-To: abuse io.com
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse io.com
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.32
Xref: newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com alt.politics.republicans:845888 alt.impeach.bush:977611 alt.politics.usa:807284 alt.politics.democrats.d:1586899 alt.politics.usa.republican:2772393 alt.rush-limbaugh:1181000 alt.politics:2764063
http://rudepundit.blogspot.com/2006/01/alito-tears-oh-sweet-martha-ann.html
1/12/2006
Alito Tears:
Oh, sweet Martha-Ann Bomgardner, you who would not take the name of
Alito as your own, come over here and dry your tears on the Rude
Pundit's shoulder. Yes, yes, it is a shame that Sammy had to endure
such harsh questions in his hearing, questions like "What do you
think?" and "Did you mean it when you said?" and "Why did you do
that?" It's so sad, isn't it, that big mean Ted Kennedy wanted to know
why Sammy joined the Concerned Alumni of Princeton.
Shhhh, dear Martha-Ann, we all know that you sign up for groups to pad
the resume', and, with Sammy applying for a job with the Meese Justice
Department, any extra right wing padding would be welcomed. Hell, back
in high school, the Rude Pundit briefly belonged to the 4-H Club so he
could put it on his college apps. Then he realized he'd have to touch
goats and chickens. And when Lindsay Graham sarcastically asked if
Sammy was a "closet bigot," well, who could hold back the floodgates
for all the implication? It's brutal, the Rude Pundit knows.
Aww, you cry so deliciously, poor Martha-Ann. The Rude Pundit bets
that you cry more bravely than that ten-year old girl when she was
strip-searched by cops as they probed her ten-year old vagina and *****
for packets of drugs. The Rude Pundit bets that you cry more loudly
than that retarded guy whose co-workers sodomized him with a broom
handle. The Rude Pundit bets that the tears of everyone ever affected
by your husband's decisions now and in the future pale in comparison
to the tears that streak you face right now.
Hush, Martha-Ann, and let the Rude Pundit comfort you. Let the Rude
Pundit love you and make love to you. Cry again when you come. And if
you should get pregnant, remember that your husband isn't on the
Supreme Court yet.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Betz" |
|
| Title: Re: Alito Tears |
14 Jan 2006 08:57:54 PM |
|
|
Quoth John Doe <jdoe@usenet.love.invalid> in
news:Xns974AF25923E1follydom@207.115.17.102:
Listening to the massive amount of praise he
received from the American Bar Association staff and all of his
federal appeals court colleague judges, you'd think he would have
ascended into heaven by now.
Those appeals court judges were violating judical canons by
testifying as they did. It has never been permitted before; that
the Republicans are stooping so low as to solicit those judges tho
***** themselves out for Alito only shows how corrupt the Federal
court system has become under the rule of Republicans.
Every one of those judges is likely to have a case come before the
Supreme Court. Alito now owes them. If Alito is confirmed and
doesn't recuse himself from cases appealed after decisions made by
those judges, he should be impeached.
--
| "There's no telling what new harm Bush might |
| do if he ever gets back up off the mat. |
| You have to keep your knee on his windpipe |
| until the danger is past." -- Garry Trudeau |
| IMPEACH <http://gug.in/ywkyg> IMPEACH |
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Doe" |
|
| Title: Re: Alito Tears |
14 Jan 2006 11:42:48 PM |
|
|
A very silly troll pretending to know about judicial canons, as if
he could instruct a half dozen appeals court judges.
Tom Betz <spammers_lie pobox.com> wrote:
Path: newssvr12.news.prodigy.com!newsdbm05.news.prodigy.com!newsdbm04.news.prodigy.com!newsdst01.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!panix!not-for-mail
From: Tom Betz <spammers_lie pobox.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.republicans,alt.impeach.bush,alt.politics.usa,alt.politics.democrats.d,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics
Subject: Re: Alito Tears
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 02:57:54 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Some
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <Xns974BDF70C7B45greenriverordinance 166.84.1.70>
References: <qsbes1hj4mia52npnd46muqp9c8j9rev3c 4ax.com> <Xns974AF25923E1follydom 207.115.17.102>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 249-208.customer.cloud9.net
X-Trace: reader2.panix.com 1137293874 27967 168.100.249.208 (15 Jan 2006 02:57:54 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse panix.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 02:57:54 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Xnews/2005.10.18
X-Face: #^=oh~^r5AV^#I3^*+(VAGoCzyvK%%w\/HM"[t&a)rHXo#NR3Z\,"/?_htmx~~gG.>v~+.I|P%it\yFS~<y|=8$$p9D3pL}_Em#,fSbyo9KXP+U/CWZMxR>TxS($ 5b8?Rn]z3N]~!6XL9A&2T}I,]-T/8wH~Ye
Xref: newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com alt.politics.republicans:847110 alt.impeach.bush:979238 alt.politics.usa:807890 alt.politics.democrats.d:1587644 alt.politics.usa.republican:2773451 alt.rush-limbaugh:1181636 alt.politics:2766119
Quoth John Doe <jdoe usenet.love.invalid> in
news:Xns974AF25923E1follydom 207.115.17.102:
Listening to the massive amount of praise he
received from the American Bar Association staff and all of his
federal appeals court colleague judges, you'd think he would have
ascended into heaven by now.
Those appeals court judges were violating judical canons by
testifying as they did. It has never been permitted before; that
the Republicans are stooping so low as to solicit those judges tho
***** themselves out for Alito only shows how corrupt the Federal
court system has become under the rule of Republicans.
Every one of those judges is likely to have a case come before the
Supreme Court. Alito now owes them. If Alito is confirmed and
doesn't recuse himself from cases appealed after decisions made by
those judges, he should be impeached.
--
| "There's no telling what new harm Bush might |
| do if he ever gets back up off the mat. |
| You have to keep your knee on his windpipe |
| until the danger is past." -- Garry Trudeau |
| IMPEACH <http://gug.in/ywkyg> IMPEACH |
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Betz" |
|
| Title: Re: Alito Tears |
15 Jan 2006 06:44:41 AM |
|
|
Quoth John Doe <jdoe@usenet.love.invalid> in
news:Xns974BF13FC29F3follydom@207.115.17.102:
A very silly troll pretending to know about judicial canons, as if
he could instruct a half dozen appeals court judges.
A very stupid top-posting Republican anonymous coward pretends
that Democratic senators didn't complain about the very same
violations I raised.
From <http://www.forbes.com/business/commerce/feeds/ap/2006/01/13/ap2448547.html>:
[Democrats] objected to a panel of Alito's colleagues on the
Court of Appeals, saying that the judicial code of ethics
advises against judges presenting character testimony. They
said Alito would be faced with a conflict of interest after
receiving the judges' endorsements if decisions by those
judges ever end up before the Supreme Court. Leahy declined to
question the panel in protest.
The same complaint was raised by Alan M. Feldman, Chairman of the
Philadelphia Bar Association, who cites chapter and verse of the
judicial canons.
From <http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/01-12-2006/0004248137&EDATE=>:
January 12, 2006
Senator Arlen Specter
711 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Dear Senator Specter:
As Chancellor of the Philadelphia Bar Association, I would like to express
our concern about your apparent intention to present testimony from Judges of
the Third Circuit Court of Appeals at the confirmation hearings of Supreme
Court Candidate Samuel A. Alito, Jr.
As you know as well as anyone, the independence of the judiciary is
critically important to our free and democratic form of government. For that
reason, judges must always be separate from the political process.
Accordingly, judges are forbidden from testifying voluntarily as character
witnesses by Canon 2(B) of the Code of Judicial Conduct. Canon 2(B) of the
American Bar Association's Code of Judicial Conduct also states in commentary
as follows:
The testimony of a judge as a character witness injects the
prestige of his office into the proceeding in which he
testifies and may be misunderstood to be an official
testimonial. This Canon, however, does not afford him a
privilege against testifying in response to an official
summons.
Similarly, Formal Opinion No. 15 of the American Bar Association Committee
on Professional Ethics cautions that character testimony from a Judge lends
the judicial position and dignity of the testifying jurist to the party for
whom the favorable testimony is offered.
Presenting testimony from Judge Alito's colleagues will be understood by
some to be a partisan activity, which politicizes not only the testifying
judges, but arguably impairs the judicial independence of all federal courts.
In future confirmation hearings, it could encourage a "battle of the judges,"
with each camp assembling teams of judges in favor of, or against, particular
candidates. It is not difficult to imagine other unseemly complications which
could arise from the introduction of what at least has the appearance of the
kind of character testimony that is prohibited by the Code of Judicial
Conduct.
Please understand that the Philadelphia Bar Association is not taking a
position with respect to Judge Alito's confirmation. Indeed, we recognize and
respect the fact that the American Bar Association's Judiciary Committee has
deemed him to be well-qualified for the position of Associate Justice of the
United States Supreme Court. Further, we do not in any respect question the
good motives or unassailable integrity of the federal judges who are proposing
to testify. We do, however, believe that permitting such testimony would
impair judicial independence, and would be a serious mistake.
As a government official who has perhaps done more than any other to
emphasize the importance of an independent judiciary, I urge you to reconsider
your invitation to Judge Alito's colleagues to testify in this highly charged
and political confirmation process.
Respectfully,
Alan M. Feldman
Unlike the stupid top-posting anonymous Republican coward, who
pretends not to be a shill of the Republican Reich, I prefer
to pay attention to what is really going on.
Tom Betz <spammers_lie pobox.com> wrote:
Quoth John Doe <jdoe usenet.>love.invalid> in
news:Xns974AF25923E1follyd>om >207.115.17.102:
Listening to the massive amount of praise he
received from the American Bar Association staff and all of his
federal appeals court colleague judges, you'd think he would have
ascended into heaven by now.
Those appeals court judges were violating judical canons by
testifying as they did. It has never been permitted before; that
the Republicans are stooping so low as to solicit those judges tho
***** themselves out for Alito only shows how corrupt the Federal
court system has become under the rule of Republicans.
Every one of those judges is likely to have a case come before the
Supreme Court. Alito now owes them. If Alito is confirmed and
doesn't recuse himself from cases appealed after decisions made by
those judges, he should be impeached.
--
| "There's no telling what new harm Bush might |
| do if he ever gets back up off the mat. |
| You have to keep your knee on his windpipe |
| until the danger is past." -- Garry Trudeau |
| IMPEACH <http://gug.in/ywkyg> IMPEACH |
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Doe" |
|
| Title: Re: Alito Tears |
16 Jan 2006 12:36:21 PM |
|
|
a silly troll pretending to be a tough guy on the Internet quoting
obviously biased sources for his make-believe knowledge about
judicial canons
Tom Betz <spammers_lie pobox.com> wrote:
Path: newsdbm05.news.prodigy.com!newsdbm04.news.prodigy.com!newsdst01.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!newshub.sdsu.edu!newsfeed.news2me.com!newsfeed2.easynews.com!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!news-out.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!panix!not-for-mail
From: Tom Betz <spammers_lie pobox.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.republicans,alt.impeach.bush,alt.politics.usa,alt.politics.democrats.d,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics
Subject: Re: Alito Tears
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 12:44:41 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Some
Lines: 117
Message-ID: <Xns974C4EC87F75Cgreenriverordinance 166.84.1.70>
References: <qsbes1hj4mia52npnd46muqp9c8j9rev3c 4ax.com> <Xns974AF25923E1follydom 207.115.17.102> <Xns974BDF70C7B45greenriverordinance 166.84.1.70> <Xns974BF13FC29F3follydom 207.115.17.102>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 249-208.customer.cloud9.net
X-Trace: reader2.panix.com 1137329081 28503 168.100.249.208 (15 Jan 2006 12:44:41 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse panix.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 12:44:41 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Xnews/2005.10.18
X-Face: #^=oh~^r5AV^#I3^*+(VAGoCzyvK%%w\/HM"[t&a)rHXo#NR3Z\,"/?_htmx~~gG.>v~+.I|P%it\yFS~<y|=8$$p9D3pL}_Em#,fSbyo9KXP+U/CWZMxR>TxS($ 5b8?Rn]z3N]~!6XL9A&2T}I,]-T/8wH~Ye
Xref: newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com alt.politics.republicans:847297 alt.impeach.bush:979567 alt.politics.usa:808002 alt.politics.democrats.d:1587801 alt.politics.usa.republican:2773699 alt.rush-limbaugh:1181784 alt.politics:2766511
Quoth John Doe <jdoe usenet.love.invalid> in
news:Xns974BF13FC29F3follydom 207.115.17.102:
A very silly troll pretending to know about judicial canons, as if
he could instruct a half dozen appeals court judges.
A very stupid top-posting Republican anonymous coward pretends
that Democratic senators didn't complain about the very same
violations I raised.
From <http://www.forbes.com/business/commerce/feeds/ap/2006/01/13/ap2448547.html>:
[Democrats] objected to a panel of Alito's colleagues on the
Court of Appeals, saying that the judicial code of ethics
advises against judges presenting character testimony. They
said Alito would be faced with a conflict of interest after
receiving the judges' endorsements if decisions by those
judges ever end up before the Supreme Court. Leahy declined to
question the panel in protest.
The same complaint was raised by Alan M. Feldman, Chairman of the
Philadelphia Bar Association, who cites chapter and verse of the
judicial canons.
From <http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/01-12-2006/0004248137&EDATE=>:
January 12, 2006
Senator Arlen Specter
711 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Dear Senator Specter:
As Chancellor of the Philadelphia Bar Association, I would like to express
our concern about your apparent intention to present testimony from Judges of
the Third Circuit Court of Appeals at the confirmation hearings of Supreme
Court Candidate Samuel A. Alito, Jr.
As you know as well as anyone, the independence of the judiciary is
critically important to our free and democratic form of government. For that
reason, judges must always be separate from the political process.
Accordingly, judges are forbidden from testifying voluntarily as character
witnesses by Canon 2(B) of the Code of Judicial Conduct. Canon 2(B) of the
American Bar Association's Code of Judicial Conduct also states in commentary
as follows:
The testimony of a judge as a character witness injects the
prestige of his office into the proceeding in which he
testifies and may be misunderstood to be an official
testimonial. This Canon, however, does not afford him a
privilege against testifying in response to an official
summons.
Similarly, Formal Opinion No. 15 of the American Bar Association Committee
on Professional Ethics cautions that character testimony from a Judge lends
the judicial position and dignity of the testifying jurist to the party for
whom the favorable testimony is offered.
Presenting testimony from Judge Alito's colleagues will be understood by
some to be a partisan activity, which politicizes not only the testifying
judges, but arguably impairs the judicial independence of all federal courts.
In future confirmation hearings, it could encourage a "battle of the judges,"
with each camp assembling teams of judges in favor of, or against, particular
candidates. It is not difficult to imagine other unseemly complications which
could arise from the introduction of what at least has the appearance of the
kind of character testimony that is prohibited by the Code of Judicial
Conduct.
Please understand that the Philadelphia Bar Association is not taking a
position with respect to Judge Alito's confirmation. Indeed, we recognize and
respect the fact that the American Bar Association's Judiciary Committee has
deemed him to be well-qualified for the position of Associate Justice of the
United States Supreme Court. Further, we do not in any respect question the
good motives or unassailable integrity of the federal judges who are proposing
to testify. We do, however, believe that permitting such testimony would
impair judicial independence, and would be a serious mistake.
As a government official who has perhaps done more than any other to
emphasize the importance of an independent judiciary, I urge you to reconsider
your invitation to Judge Alito's colleagues to testify in this highly charged
and political confirmation process.
Respectfully,
Alan M. Feldman
Unlike the stupid top-posting anonymous Republican coward, who
pretends not to be a shill of the Republican Reich, I prefer
to pay attention to what is really going on.
Tom Betz <spammers_lie pobox.com> wrote:
Quoth John Doe <jdoe usenet.>love.invalid> in
news:Xns974AF25923E1follyd>om >207.115.17.102:
Listening to the massive amount of praise he
received from the American Bar Association staff and all of his
federal appeals court colleague judges, you'd think he would have
ascended into heaven by now.
Those appeals court judges were violating judical canons by
testifying as they did. It has never been permitted before; that
the Republicans are stooping so low as to solicit those judges tho
***** themselves out for Alito only shows how corrupt the Federal
court system has become under the rule of Republicans.
Every one of those judges is likely to have a case come before the
Supreme Court. Alito now owes them. If Alito is confirmed and
doesn't recuse himself from cases appealed after decisions made by
those judges, he should be impeached.
--
| "There's no telling what new harm Bush might |
| do if he ever gets back up off the mat. |
| You have to keep your knee on his windpipe |
| until the danger is past." -- Garry Trudeau |
| IMPEACH <http://gug.in/ywkyg> IMPEACH |
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Betz" |
|
| Title: Re: Alito Tears |
16 Jan 2006 02:42:38 PM |
|
|
Quoth John Doe <jdoe@usenet.love.invalid> in
news:Xns974D8043076C8follydom@207.115.17.102:
a silly troll pretending to be a tough guy on the Internet quoting
obviously biased sources for his make-believe knowledge about
judicial canons
Of course, unlike the top-posting Republican anonymous coward, I
have backed up what I have posted under my own name.
The top-posting Republican anonymous coward can only toss
limp-wristed anonymous insults in a vain attempt to distract from
the unsupported weakness of his Reich-wing biased position.
I challenge the top-posting Republican anonymous coward to provide
a single example of a Democratic President stooping so low as to
induce Federal Appeals judges to testify on behalf of one of his
Supreme Court nominees.
Tom Betz <spammers_lie pobox.com> wrote:
Quoth John Doe <jdoe usenet.love.invalid> in
news:Xns974BF13FC29F3follydom 207.115.17.102:
A very silly troll pretending to know about judicial canons, as if
he could instruct a half dozen appeals court judges.
A very stupid top-posting Republican anonymous coward pretends
that Democratic senators didn't complain about the very same
violations I raised.
From <http://www.forbes.com/business/commerce/feeds/ap/2006/01/13/ap2448547.html>:
[Democrats] objected to a panel of Alito's colleagues on the
Court of Appeals, saying that the judicial code of ethics
advises against judges presenting character testimony. They
said Alito would be faced with a conflict of interest after
receiving the judges' endorsements if decisions by those
judges ever end up before the Supreme Court. Leahy declined to
question the panel in protest.
The same complaint was raised by Alan M. Feldman, Chairman of the
Philadelphia Bar Association, who cites chapter and verse of the
judicial canons.
From <http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/01-12-2006/0004248137&EDATE=>:
January 12, 2006
Senator Arlen Specter
711 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Dear Senator Specter:
As Chancellor of the Philadelphia Bar Association, I would like to express
our concern about your apparent intention to present testimony from Judges of
the Third Circuit Court of Appeals at the confirmation hearings of Supreme
Court Candidate Samuel A. Alito, Jr.
As you know as well as anyone, the independence of the judiciary is
critically important to our free and democratic form of government. For that
reason, judges must always be separate from the political process.
Accordingly, judges are forbidden from testifying voluntarily as character
witnesses by Canon 2(B) of the Code of Judicial Conduct. Canon 2(B) of the
American Bar Association's Code of Judicial Conduct also states in commentary
as follows:
The testimony of a judge as a character witness injects the
prestige of his office into the proceeding in which he
testifies and may be misunderstood to be an official
testimonial. This Canon, however, does not afford him a
privilege against testifying in response to an official
summons.
Similarly, Formal Opinion No. 15 of the American Bar Association Committee
on Professional Ethics cautions that character testimony from a Judge lends
the judicial position and dignity of the testifying jurist to the party for
whom the favorable testimony is offered.
Presenting testimony from Judge Alito's colleagues will be understood by
some to be a partisan activity, which politicizes not only the testifying
judges, but arguably impairs the judicial independence of all federal courts.
In future confirmation hearings, it could encourage a "battle of the judges,"
with each camp assembling teams of judges in favor of, or against, particular
candidates. It is not difficult to imagine other unseemly complications which
could arise from the introduction of what at least has the appearance of the
kind of character testimony that is prohibited by the Code of Judicial
Conduct.
Please understand that the Philadelphia Bar Association is not taking a
position with respect to Judge Alito's confirmation. Indeed, we recognize and
respect the fact that the American Bar Association's Judiciary Committee has
deemed him to be well-qualified for the position of Associate Justice of the
United States Supreme Court. Further, we do not in any respect question the
good motives or unassailable integrity of the federal judges who are proposing
to testify. We do, however, believe that permitting such testimony would
impair judicial independence, and would be a serious mistake.
As a government official who has perhaps done more than any other to
emphasize the importance of an independent judiciary, I urge you to reconsider
your invitation to Judge Alito's colleagues to testify in this highly charged
and political confirmation process.
Respectfully,
Alan M. Feldman
Unlike the stupid top-posting anonymous Republican coward, who
pretends not to be a shill of the Republican Reich, I prefer
to pay attention to what is really going on.
Tom Betz <spammers_lie pobox.com> wrote:
Quoth John Doe <jdoe usenet.>love.invalid> in
news:Xns974AF25923E1follyd>om >207.115.17.102:
Listening to the massive amount of praise he
received from the American Bar Association staff and all of his
federal appeals court colleague judges, you'd think he would have
ascended into heaven by now.
Those appeals court judges were violating judical canons by
testifying as they did. It has never been permitted before; that
the Republicans are stooping so low as to solicit those judges tho
***** themselves out for Alito only shows how corrupt the Federal
court system has become under the rule of Republicans.
Every one of those judges is likely to have a case come before the
Supreme Court. Alito now owes them. If Alito is confirmed and
doesn't recuse himself from cases appealed after decisions made by
those judges, he should be impeached.
--
| "There's no telling what new harm Bush might |
| do if he ever gets back up off the mat. |
| You have to keep your knee on his windpipe |
| until the danger is past." -- Garry Trudeau |
| IMPEACH <http://gug.in/ywkyg> IMPEACH |
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Doe" |
|
| Title: Re: Alito Tears |
16 Jan 2006 05:05:14 PM |
|
|
A silly troll who thinks he's a tough guy on the Internet.
Tom Betz <spammers_lie pobox.com> wrote:
Path: newssvr21.news.prodigy.com!newsdbm04.news.prodigy.com!newsdst01.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!news-east.rr.com!news.rr.com!news-out.readnews.com!news-out.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!panix!not-for-mail
From: Tom Betz <spammers_lie pobox.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.republicans,alt.impeach.bush,alt.politics.usa,alt.politics.democrats.d,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics
Subject: Re: Alito Tears
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:42:38 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Some
Lines: 141
Message-ID: <Xns974D9FD08E26Fgreenriverordinance 166.84.1.70>
References: <qsbes1hj4mia52npnd46muqp9c8j9rev3c 4ax.com> <Xns974AF25923E1follydom 207.115.17.102> <Xns974BDF70C7B45greenriverordinance 166.84.1.70> <Xns974BF13FC29F3follydom 207.115.17.102> <Xns974C4EC87F75Cgreenriverordinance 166.84.1.70> <Xns974D8043076C8follydom 207.115.17.102>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 249-208.customer.cloud9.net
X-Trace: reader2.panix.com 1137444158 8286 168.100.249.208 (16 Jan 2006 20:42:38 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse panix.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:42:38 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Xnews/2005.10.18
X-Face: #^=oh~^r5AV^#I3^*+(VAGoCzyvK%%w\/HM"[t&a)rHXo#NR3Z\,"/?_htmx~~gG.>v~+.I|P%it\yFS~<y|=8$$p9D3pL}_Em#,fSbyo9KXP+U/CWZMxR>TxS($ 5b8?Rn]z3N]~!6XL9A&2T}I,]-T/8wH~Ye
Xref: newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com alt.politics.republicans:848984 alt.impeach.bush:981412 alt.politics.usa:808940 alt.politics.democrats.d:1588842 alt.politics.usa.republican:2775539 alt.rush-limbaugh:1182794 alt.politics:2769558
Quoth John Doe <jdoe usenet.love.invalid> in
news:Xns974D8043076C8follydom 207.115.17.102:
a silly troll pretending to be a tough guy on the Internet quoting
obviously biased sources for his make-believe knowledge about
judicial canons
Of course, unlike the top-posting Republican anonymous coward, I
have backed up what I have posted under my own name.
The top-posting Republican anonymous coward can only toss
limp-wristed anonymous insults in a vain attempt to distract from
the unsupported weakness of his Reich-wing biased position.
I challenge the top-posting Republican anonymous coward to provide
a single example of a Democratic President stooping so low as to
induce Federal Appeals judges to testify on behalf of one of his
Supreme Court nominees.
Tom Betz <spammers_lie pobox.com> wrote:
Quoth John Doe <jdoe usenet.love.invalid> in
news:Xns974BF13FC29F3follydom 207.115.17.102:
A very silly troll pretending to know about judicial canons, as if
he could instruct a half dozen appeals court judges.
A very stupid top-posting Republican anonymous coward pretends
that Democratic senators didn't complain about the very same
violations I raised.
From <http://www.forbes.com/business/commerce/feeds/ap/2006/01/13/ap2448547.html>:
[Democrats] objected to a panel of Alito's colleagues on the
Court of Appeals, saying that the judicial code of ethics
advises against judges presenting character testimony. They
said Alito would be faced with a conflict of interest after
receiving the judges' endorsements if decisions by those
judges ever end up before the Supreme Court. Leahy declined to
question the panel in protest.
The same complaint was raised by Alan M. Feldman, Chairman of the
Philadelphia Bar Association, who cites chapter and verse of the
judicial canons.
From <http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/01-12-2006/0004248137&EDATE=>:
January 12, 2006
Senator Arlen Specter
711 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Dear Senator Specter:
As Chancellor of the Philadelphia Bar Association, I would like to express
our concern about your apparent intention to present testimony from Judges of
the Third Circuit Court of Appeals at the confirmation hearings of Supreme
Court Candidate Samuel A. Alito, Jr.
As you know as well as anyone, the independence of the judiciary is
critically important to our free and democratic form of government. For that
reason, judges must always be separate from the political process.
Accordingly, judges are forbidden from testifying voluntarily as character
witnesses by Canon 2(B) of the Code of Judicial Conduct. Canon 2(B) of the
American Bar Association's Code of Judicial Conduct also states in commentary
as follows:
The testimony of a judge as a character witness injects the
prestige of his office into the proceeding in which he
testifies and may be misunderstood to be an official
testimonial. This Canon, however, does not afford him a
privilege against testifying in response to an official
summons.
Similarly, Formal Opinion No. 15 of the American Bar Association Committee
on Professional Ethics cautions that character testimony from a Judge lends
the judicial position and dignity of the testifying jurist to the party for
whom the favorable testimony is offered.
Presenting testimony from Judge Alito's colleagues will be understood by
some to be a partisan activity, which politicizes not only the testifying
judges, but arguably impairs the judicial independence of all federal courts.
In future confirmation hearings, it could encourage a "battle of the judges,"
with each camp assembling teams of judges in favor of, or against, particular
candidates. It is not difficult to imagine other unseemly complications which
could arise from the introduction of what at least has the appearance of the
kind of character testimony that is prohibited by the Code of Judicial
Conduct.
Please understand that the Philadelphia Bar Association is not taking a
position with respect to Judge Alito's confirmation. Indeed, we recognize and
respect the fact that the American Bar Association's Judiciary Committee has
deemed him to be well-qualified for the position of Associate Justice of the
United States Supreme Court. Further, we do not in any respect question the
good motives or unassailable integrity of the federal judges who are proposing
to testify. We do, however, believe that permitting such testimony would
impair judicial independence, and would be a serious mistake.
As a government official who has perhaps done more than any other to
emphasize the importance of an independent judiciary, I urge you to reconsider
your invitation to Judge Alito's colleagues to testify in this highly charged
and political confirmation process.
Respectfully,
Alan M. Feldman
Unlike the stupid top-posting anonymous Republican coward, who
pretends not to be a shill of the Republican Reich, I prefer
to pay attention to what is really going on.
Tom Betz <spammers_lie pobox.com> wrote:
Quoth John Doe <jdoe usenet.>love.invalid> in
news:Xns974AF25923E1follyd>om >207.115.17.102:
Listening to the massive amount of praise he
received from the American Bar Association staff and all of his
federal appeals court colleague judges, you'd think he would have
ascended into heaven by now.
Those appeals court judges were violating judical canons by
testifying as they did. It has never been permitted before; that
the Republicans are stooping so low as to solicit those judges tho
***** themselves out for Alito only shows how corrupt the Federal
court system has become under the rule of Republicans.
Every one of those judges is likely to have a case come before the
Supreme Court. Alito now owes them. If Alito is confirmed and
doesn't recuse himself from cases appealed after decisions made by
those judges, he should be impeached.
--
| "There's no telling what new harm Bush might |
| do if he ever gets back up off the mat. |
| You have to keep your knee on his windpipe |
| until the danger is past." -- Garry Trudeau |
| IMPEACH <http://gug.in/ywkyg> IMPEACH |
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Betz" |
|
| Title: Re: Alito Tears |
16 Jan 2006 10:51:45 PM |
|
|
Quoth John Doe <jdoe@usenet.love.invalid> in news:Xns974DADD91D160follydom@207.115.17.102:
A silly troll who thinks he's a tough guy on the Internet.
And the top-posting Republican anonymous coward demonstrates again
the emptiness of its pose, showing itself to be a total waste of time.
Tom Betz <spammers_lie pobox.com> wrote:
a silly troll pretending to be a tough guy on the Internet quoting
obviously biased sources for his make-believe knowledge about
judicial canons
Of course, unlike the top-posting Republican anonymous coward, I
have backed up what I have posted under my own name.
The top-posting Republican anonymous coward can only toss
limp-wristed anonymous insults in a vain attempt to distract from
the unsupported weakness of his Reich-wing biased position.
I challenge the top-posting Republican anonymous coward to provide
a single example of a Democratic President stooping so low as to
induce Federal Appeals judges to testify on behalf of one of his
Supreme Court nominees.
Tom Betz <spammers_lie pobox.com> wrote:
Quoth John Doe <jdoe usenet.love.invalid> in
news:Xns974BF13FC29F3follydom 207.115.17.102:
A very silly troll pretending to know about judicial canons, as if
he could instruct a half dozen appeals court judges.
A very stupid top-posting Republican anonymous coward pretends
that Democratic senators didn't complain about the very same
violations I raised.
From <http://www.forbes.com/business/commerce/feeds/ap/2006/01/13/ap2448547.html>:
[Democrats] objected to a panel of Alito's colleagues on the
Court of Appeals, saying that the judicial code of ethics
advises against judges presenting character testimony. They
said Alito would be faced with a conflict of interest after
receiving the judges' endorsements if decisions by those
judges ever end up before the Supreme Court. Leahy declined to
question the panel in protest.
The same complaint was raised by Alan M. Feldman, Chairman of the
Philadelphia Bar Association, who cites chapter and verse of the
judicial canons.
From <http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/01-12-2006/0004248137&EDATE=>:
January 12, 2006
Senator Arlen Specter
711 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Dear Senator Specter:
As Chancellor of the Philadelphia Bar Association, I would like to express
our concern about your apparent intention to present testimony from Judges of
the Third Circuit Court of Appeals at the confirmation hearings of Supreme
Court Candidate Samuel A. Alito, Jr.
As you know as well as anyone, the independence of the judiciary is
critically important to our free and democratic form of government. For that
reason, judges must always be separate from the political process.
Accordingly, judges are forbidden from testifying voluntarily as character
witnesses by Canon 2(B) of the Code of Judicial Conduct. Canon 2(B) of the
American Bar Association's Code of Judicial Conduct also states in commentary
as follows:
The testimony of a judge as a character witness injects the
prestige of his office into the proceeding in which he
testifies and may be misunderstood to be an official
testimonial. This Canon, however, does not afford him a
privilege against testifying in response to an official
summons.
Similarly, Formal Opinion No. 15 of the American Bar Association Committee
on Professional Ethics cautions that character testimony from a Judge lends
the judicial position and dignity of the testifying jurist to the party for
whom the favorable testimony is offered.
Presenting testimony from Judge Alito's colleagues will be understood by
some to be a partisan activity, which politicizes not only the testifying
judges, but arguably impairs the judicial independence of all federal courts.
In future confirmation hearings, it could encourage a "battle of the judges,"
with each camp assembling teams of judges in favor of, or against, particular
candidates. It is not difficult to imagine other unseemly complications which
could arise from the introduction of what at least has the appearance of the
kind of character testimony that is prohibited by the Code of Judicial
Conduct.
Please understand that the Philadelphia Bar Association is not taking a
position with respect to Judge Alito's confirmation. Indeed, we recognize and
respect the fact that the American Bar Association's Judiciary Committee has
deemed him to be well-qualified for the position of Associate Justice of the
United States Supreme Court. Further, we do not in any respect question the
good motives or unassailable integrity of the federal judges who are proposing
to testify. We do, however, believe that permitting such testimony would
impair judicial independence, and would be a serious mistake.
As a government official who has perhaps done more than any other to
emphasize the importance of an independent judiciary, I urge you to reconsider
your invitation to Judge Alito's colleagues to testify in this highly charged
and political confirmation process.
Respectfully,
Alan M. Feldman
Unlike the stupid top-posting anonymous Republican coward, who
pretends not to be a shill of the Republican Reich, I prefer
to pay attention to what is really going on.
Tom Betz <spammers_lie pobox.com> wrote:
Quoth John Doe <jdoe usenet.>love.invalid> in
news:Xns974AF25923E1follyd>om >207.115.17.102:
Listening to the massive amount of praise he
received from the American Bar Association staff and all of his
federal appeals court colleague judges, you'd think he would have
ascended into heaven by now.
Those appeals court judges were violating judical canons by
testifying as they did. It has never been permitted before; that
the Republicans are stooping so low as to solicit those judges tho
***** themselves out for Alito only shows how corrupt the Federal
court system has become under the rule of Republicans.
Every one of those judges is likely to have a case come before the
Supreme Court. Alito now owes them. If Alito is confirmed and
doesn't recuse himself from cases appealed after decisions made by
those judges, he should be impeached.
--
| "There's no telling what new harm Bush might |
| do if he ever gets back up off the mat. |
| You have to keep your knee on his windpipe |
| until the danger is past." -- Garry Trudeau |
| IMPEACH <http://gug.in/ywkyg> IMPEACH |
--
| "There's no telling what new harm Bush might |
| do if he ever gets back up off the mat. |
| You have to keep your knee on his windpipe |
| until the danger is past." -- Garry Trudeau |
| IMPEACH <http://gug.in/ywkyg> IMPEACH |
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Doe" |
|
| Title: Re: Alito Tears |
17 Jan 2006 04:56:26 AM |
|
|
A partisan tough guy wanna-be who imagines everyone that disagrees
with him must be a Republican, this troll is unable to think for
himself.
Tom Betz <spammers_lie pobox.com> wrote:
Path: newssvr21.news.prodigy.com!newsdbm04.news.prodigy.com!newsdst01.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!newscon02.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.readnews.com!news-out.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!panix!not-for-mail
From: Tom Betz <spammers_lie pobox.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.republicans,alt.impeach.bush,alt.politics.usa,alt.politics.democrats.d,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics
Subject: Re: Alito Tears
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 04:51:45 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Some
Lines: 164
Message-ID: <Xns974DF2BE1DEAFgreenriverordinance 166.84.1.70>
References: <qsbes1hj4mia52npnd46muqp9c8j9rev3c 4ax.com> <Xns974AF25923E1follydom 207.115.17.102> <Xns974BDF70C7B45greenriverordinance 166.84.1.70> <Xns974BF13FC29F3follydom 207.115.17.102> <Xns974C4EC87F75Cgreenriverordinance 166.84.1.70> <Xns974D8043076C8follydom 207.115.17.102> <Xns974D9FD08E26Fgreenriverordinance 166.84.1.70> <Xns974DADD91D160follydom 207.115.17.102>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 249-208.customer.cloud9.net
X-Trace: reader2.panix.com 1137473505 24258 168.100.249.208 (17 Jan 2006 04:51:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse panix.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 04:51:45 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Xnews/2005.10.18
X-Face: #^=oh~^r5AV^#I3^*+(VAGoCzyvK%%w\/HM"[t&a)rHXo#NR3Z\,"/?_htmx~~gG.>v~+.I|P%it\yFS~<y|=8$$p9D3pL}_Em#,fSbyo9KXP+U/CWZMxR>TxS($ 5b8?Rn]z3N]~!6XL9A&2T}I,]-T/8wH~Ye
Xref: newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com alt.politics.republicans:849942 alt.impeach.bush:982234 alt.politics.usa:809424 alt.politics.democrats.d:1589268 alt.politics.usa.republican:2776267 alt.rush-limbaugh:1183284 alt.politics:2770920
Quoth John Doe <jdoe usenet.love.invalid> in news:Xns974DADD91D160follydom 207.115.17.102:
A silly troll who thinks he's a tough guy on the Internet.
And the top-posting Republican anonymous coward demonstrates again
the emptiness of its pose, showing itself to be a total waste of time.
Tom Betz <spammers_lie pobox.com> wrote:
a silly troll pretending to be a tough guy on the Internet quoting
obviously biased sources for his make-believe knowledge about
judicial canons
Of course, unlike the top-posting Republican anonymous coward, I
have backed up what I have posted under my own name.
The top-posting Republican anonymous coward can only toss
limp-wristed anonymous insults in a vain attempt to distract from
the unsupported weakness of his Reich-wing biased position.
I challenge the top-posting Republican anonymous coward to provide
a single example of a Democratic President stooping so low as to
induce Federal Appeals judges to testify on behalf of one of his
Supreme Court nominees.
Tom Betz <spammers_lie pobox.com> wrote:
Quoth John Doe <jdoe usenet.love.invalid> in
news:Xns974BF13FC29F3follydom 207.115.17.102:
A very silly troll pretending to know about judicial canons, as if
he could instruct a half dozen appeals court judges.
A very stupid top-posting Republican anonymous coward pretends
that Democratic senators didn't complain about the very same
violations I raised.
From <http://www.forbes.com/business/commerce/feeds/ap/2006/01/13/ap2448547.html>:
[Democrats] objected to a panel of Alito's colleagues on the
Court of Appeals, saying that the judicial code of ethics
advises against judges presenting character testimony. They
said Alito would be faced with a conflict of interest after
receiving the judges' endorsements if decisions by those
judges ever end up before the Supreme Court. Leahy declined to
question the panel in protest.
The same complaint was raised by Alan M. Feldman, Chairman of the
Philadelphia Bar Association, who cites chapter and verse of the
judicial canons.
From <http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/01-12-2006/0004248137&EDATE=>:
January 12, 2006
Senator Arlen Specter
711 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Dear Senator Specter:
As Chancellor of the Philadelphia Bar Association, I would like to express
our concern about your apparent intention to present testimony from Judges of
the Third Circuit Court of Appeals at the confirmation hearings of Supreme
Court Candidate Samuel A. Alito, Jr.
As you know as well as anyone, the independence of the judiciary is
critically important to our free and democratic form of government. For that
reason, judges must always be separate from the political process.
Accordingly, judges are forbidden from testifying voluntarily as character
witnesses by Canon 2(B) of the Code of Judicial Conduct. Canon 2(B) of the
American Bar Association's Code of Judicial Conduct also states in commentary
as follows:
The testimony of a judge as a character witness injects the
prestige of his office into the proceeding in which he
testifies and may be misunderstood to be an official
testimonial. This Canon, however, does not afford him a
privilege against testifying in response to an official
summons.
Similarly, Formal Opinion No. 15 of the American Bar Association Committee
on Professional Ethics cautions that character testimony from a Judge lends
the judicial position and dignity of the testifying jurist to the party for
whom the favorable testimony is offered.
Presenting testimony from Judge Alito's colleagues will be understood by
some to be a partisan activity, which politicizes not only the testifying
judges, but arguably impairs the judicial independence of all federal courts.
In future confirmation hearings, it could encourage a "battle of the judges,"
with each camp assembling teams of judges in favor of, or against, particular
candidates. It is not difficult to imagine other unseemly complications which
could arise from the introduction of what at least has the appearance of the
kind of character testimony that is prohibited by the Code of Judicial
Conduct.
Please understand that the Philadelphia Bar Association is not taking a
position with respect to Judge Alito's confirmation. Indeed, we recognize and
respect the fact that the American Bar Association's Judiciary Committee has
deemed him to be well-qualified for the position of Associate Justice of the
United States Supreme Court. Further, we do not in any respect question the
good motives or unassailable integrity of the federal judges who are proposing
to testify. We do, however, believe that permitting such testimony would
impair judicial independence, and would be a serious mistake.
As a government official who has perhaps done more than any other to
emphasize the importance of an independent judiciary, I urge you to reconsider
your invitation to Judge Alito's colleagues to testify in this highly charged
and political confirmation process.
Respectfully,
Alan M. Feldman
Unlike the stupid top-posting anonymous Republican coward, who
pretends not to be a shill of the Republican Reich, I prefer
to pay attention to what is really going on.
Tom Betz <spammers_lie pobox.com> wrote:
Quoth John Doe <jdoe usenet.>love.invalid> in
news:Xns974AF25923E1follyd>om >207.115.17.102:
Listening to the massive amount of praise he
received from the American Bar Association staff and all of his
federal appeals court colleague judges, you'd think he would have
ascended into heaven by now.
Those appeals court judges were violating judical canons by
testifying as they did. It has never been permitted before; that
the Republicans are stooping so low as to solicit those judges tho
***** themselves out for Alito only shows how corrupt the Federal
court system has become under the rule of Republicans.
Every one of those judges is likely to have a case come before the
Supreme Court. Alito now owes them. If Alito is confirmed and
doesn't recuse himself from cases appealed after decisions made by
those judges, he should be impeached.
--
| "There's no telling what new harm Bush might |
| do if he ever gets back up off the mat. |
| You have to keep your knee on his windpipe |
| until the danger is past." -- Garry Trudeau |
| IMPEACH <http://gug.in/ywkyg> IMPEACH |
--
| "There's no telling what new harm Bush might |
| do if he ever gets back up off the mat. |
| You have to keep your knee on his windpipe |
| until the danger is past." -- Garry Trudeau |
| IMPEACH <http://gug.in/ywkyg> IMPEACH |
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
