"L'Amazone" <SalonHostess@20RueJacob.fr> wrote in message
news:441EA7FE.AC7FA651@20RueJacob.fr...
Stan de SD wrote:
"L'Amazone" <SalonHostess@20RueJacob.fr> wrote in message
news:441E3836.590B7D32@20RueJacob.fr...
<snip useless dialogue>
Sorry Stan;
You edit to remove parts of my responses, then you claim no response.
Where? If you are referring to this:
Inheritance is an issue
Ability to provide medical consent for a partner is an issue
vulnerability to death duties is an issue
shares benefits from employment is an issue
.... it wasn't snipped, and it wasn't a response. I asked for
substantiation - all you did was repeat the same claim again. That is NOT a
response. Got it?
When you
can actually communicte rather than use the NKNC(naughty kooky neo con)
playbook
There was plenty of communication. You're the one doing the major
snipping...
for vapid cliches, then we might have a change to dialogue. As it is, you
seem
to be auditioning for Focus on the Family press secretary
I see you're using the Bonnie ***** tactic of snip and denial. Here, let me
repost my response again so everyone can see what little deceitful games you
and the rest of the mentally crippled gay militants are playing:
===============================================================
"L'Amazone" <SalonHostess@20RueJacob.fr> wrote in message
news:441E3836.590B7D32@20RueJacob.fr...
I am femme, lipstick, polished and Lesbian. I wear designer clothing.
I
dine or
seek entertainment in upscale establishments that in all likelihood,
You feel compelled to brag about as a crutch for your insecurity. My
"upscale neighborhood" as of late is Yurakucho where I munch yakitori
and
drink beer in my favorite stand under the JR tracks, FWIW. In any case,
where you hang out doesn't make you special - what you do is...
No response there, I see...
you could
not afford and would be a poor fit in. Your sweeping and demeaning
generalization about g/L lifestyle is inaccurate.
I make no "sweeping and demeaning generalization" of all gays and
lesbians.
I merely point out the behavior of the militant queer kooks who crave
victimization and the political power it gives them, and point out their
excesses. The fact that you think my criticism of the kooks who populate
alt.politics.homosexuality is directed at all gays and lesbians is
merely
narcissism and projection on your part.
Wasn't it?
Sorry you still don't get it.
I am an activist, one of those whom you are attacking
Activist means you don't have a real job, right? You just ***** and moan and
demand special favors...
We do not have a wacko agenda,
*****.
Charming turn of phrase...
If the shoe fits, wear it.
just equal rights....
No, you want SPECIAL RIGHTS, like the right to redefine social
institutions
such as marriage, and the ability to be free of criticism from others.
No, to extend them, jsut as once they were extended beyond the white
race...
Name one right that the "white race" has that you don't...
And while we're at it, let me clear up a few more distortions you
kooks
make
when you have to deal with people you disagree with:
(1) This is a free country, but freedom works both ways. Your right
to
have
sexual relations with other consenting adults of the same sex does
not
void
my right to mock, criticize, and ridicule you as I see fit in a
public
forum.
Shall we return the favour?
You can, but being that, to put it bluntly, you're not the normal ones
means that you won't get much traction from it.
You are in no position to say who is normal,
Yes I am, from both a biological AND a statistical perspective. Merely the
fact that you view not being normal as a pejorative is no reason to redefine
commonly accepted terms in the English language.
move in for my work and my recreation, you would be regarded, depending
upon
where I am living at the moment, as a culchie or a boor.
Ask if I give a rats-***** what a bunch of hyper-sensitive lefty kooks think
of me. You and your ilk are so far out on the margins that what you think
really doesn't matter in the mainstream world.
(2) Most people don't have issues with the fact that you're gay.
They
have
issues with the fact that militant gays push their agenda at every
opportunity to the point of being confrontational.
I cannot imagine being publically confrontational.I debate, I
ediorialize.
I
comment.
You play the victim game like the rest of the militant queer crowd.
Given that I have been victimzed by people with comparable enlightemnent
and
love for those different as you possess, I have been a victim in the past.
Waa-aah. You and 5 billion other people on this planet.
Cut the martyr crap, OK? You're not being criticized because you are a
lesbian. You're being criticized because you're trying to push specious and
inconsistent arguments to advance your silly agenda. Get a clue...
Now, my dear, I am an agitator
Nah, you're an agitator in the tradition of a half-century of whiny-whiny
welfare-state-feel-good-liberalism.
(3) Dislike, disgust, and contempt for certain aspects of homosexual
behavior is NOT a "phobia".
Tis ok. I find the idea of sex with a man nauseating.
Which of course means you are abnormal, but if it makes you feel any
better,
I find the idea of having sex with a man just as repulsive. :O|
wwell, we do finally have a common basis for dialogue...we both like
women....in
fact, we may find the same kinds of women attractive, for all we know.....
No, I like the smart ones, which sorta rules you out.
(4) Most homosexuals are hypocrites. They adapt left-wing,
anti-American
stances, and criticize Christians and Americans for imagined
injustices,
but
say nothing about the abuses of homsexuals in the Muslim world.
You do not read gay and Lesbian political literature. We are
constantly
protesting to both the US government and the UN about abuses of gays
and
Lesbians in the Islamic world.
Since when? All the militant kooks in the Bay Ara are so obsessed with
being
more anti-Bush than anything else that they have become craven
apologists
for Islam.
As recently as yesterday, a condemnation of the Afghani warlords treatment
of
gays and Lesbians, last week another condemnation of Saudi Arabia and
Iran......
When are you going to start protesting on the streets of Tehran? I'll take
you seriously when you do that much.
<snip for space>
(6) If you're so confident in your own minds that homosexuality is
fine
and
dandy, why all the pressure to force others to endorse your point of
view?
We only want equal rights, hate us all that you want to,
I don't "hate" gays, so stop spreading that lie, OK?
Fine. You like us.
I don't "like" or "hate" people based on their sexual behavior. I form my
judgements on an individual basis.
but dont use that
hatred to block our rights to property,
Who's blocking your property rights? Sources? Cites?
No answer, I see...
partnership, inheiritance,
Who's blocking your rights to inherit money, or will it to others?
Sources?
Cites?
No answer, I see...
medical consent, and benefit rights.
Who's blocking your rights here? A slight clarification, however - there
is
no right to DEMAND that others provide medical care or insurance for
you...
No answer, I see...
Kindly let me know if there is anything else I can set you
"straight" on
(pun intended...) ;O)
Thanks no..
If you knew whereof you speak, perhaps.
I am speaking of rights between two same sex partners.
Which are what?
Inheritance is an issue
Ability to provide medical consent for a partner is an issue
vulnerability to death duties is an issue
shares benefits from employment is an issue
You can't answer the questions - all you can do is blather in vague terms.
It's pretty clear you're bullshitting us...
Your misconceptions and generalizations about us,
Sorry, sister, but YOU are the one guilty of the misconceptions and
generalization. You're still trying to play this game that anyone who
disagrees with you is a "hater" or is somehow depriving you of your
rights.
That's a bunch of crap, and you're being called on it.
I apologize. You are not a hater
You do advocate, however keeping us with fewer rights than a het couple.
Once again, show me the sources and cites....
your lack of knowledge about the actual topics of activism
I have plenty of knowledge about so-called "activism", having been
exposed
to activist family members, friends, and neighbors as a kid growing up
in
the SF Bay Area in the late 1960's and early 1970's, having written for
an
"underground" high school paper in the 1970's, having graduated from Cal
Berkeley and followed the antics of the New Left for several decades
now. As
far as I am concerned "activism" is the art of demanding that somebody
ELSE
do something about your problems while taking the credit and flaunting a
(mistakenly assumed) attitude of moral superiority. IMHO activists rank
somewhere between lawyers and politicans for their honesty, and between
cockroaches and DMV employees for their usefulness and productivity.
Most kind.
I was once married to someone like you, who soured on liberalsim and ended
up
working for Dobson
I'm not a huge fan of Dobson, but he makes some reasonable points. Sounds
like your ex got smart...
convinces me that you do not know, nor are you are interested in
knowing,
for it would
interfere with your prejudices.
You're the one with the prejudices, sister. You can't deal with the fact
that declaring yourself a "lesbian" doesn't make you immune from
criticism,
and you're whining like a baby about it.
I am hardly whining Sir.
I am DEMANDING that it end.
Demanding of who?
.
