| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"John Manning" |
| Date: |
25 Jul 2003 04:24:45 PM |
| Object: |
Barbara Walker is a paid Bush propogandist... |
....or she is a crypto-fascist like Ann Coulter.
Ann Coulter (cartoon)
http://www.danzigercartoons.com/img/2003/dancart1719.jpg
Bush Deficit (simple chart from
congressional Office of Management and
Budget):
Note the Clinton 8 years of growth compared
to the Bush 2 1/2 years of historic drastic
deficit.
http://www.bartcop.com/chart-deficit-OMB.jpg
John Manning
.
|
|
| User: "James Hall" |
|
| Title: Re: Barbara Walker is a paid Bush propogandist... |
25 Jul 2003 06:20:07 PM |
|
|
"John Manning" <johnrm@terra.com.br> wrote in message
news:3F21A01D.9090405@terra.com.br...
...or she is a crypto-fascist like Ann Coulter.
Oh write it ain't so ! Not the light of my heart, the heat of my
soul, the tease of my *****, no it ain't so.
JHall
"Firearms do not kill, the dead ate those bullets".
Ann Coulter (cartoon)
http://www.danzigercartoons.com/img/2003/dancart1719.jpg
Bush Deficit (simple chart from
congressional Office of Management and
Budget):
Note the Clinton 8 years of growth compared
to the Bush 2 1/2 years of historic drastic
deficit.
http://www.bartcop.com/chart-deficit-OMB.jpg
John Manning
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Metzler" |
|
| Title: Re: Barbara Walker is a paid Bush propogandist... |
25 Jul 2003 05:35:09 PM |
|
|
There is no question Barbara Walker (Rene) is a paid spammer.
There are plenty of right-wing zealots on the net, but nobody would
consistently
spam for so long unless they were paid.
(It should come as no surprise that Rene's other job is sending out email
ads for penis enlargement.)
The big question is why anyone would pay her to do such a crappy job?
For example, this post where she claims Democrats are losing ground in the
polls.
If you follow the link, you will see a whole list of polls, on this topic,
with narrow and statistically insignificant
differences between the parties, but nothing to suggest the Republicans are
doing better than the Democrats.
Perhaps Rene is just drunk. But I imagine Rene just doesn't give a damn
about Quality, Truth, or Integrity,
and just wants to make a lousy buck so she can buy some more wine.
*************************
"Polls among registered voters show that the Republicans have gained ground
over the Democrats since the 1st of the year for the upcoming 2004
Congressional races. Democrats used to lead that race; now they trail the
Republicans. In addition, the number of "Not Sure" voters has declined.
"Things are NOT looking up for the Democrats, despite (or perhaps BECAUSE
OF?) their full-court Attack Dog mode of conducting themselves since Pelosi
took over and made the Party lurch leftward.
http://www.pollingreport.com/cong2004.htm
--
****************************************************************************
An Archive of Nobel-Prize-Winning Pacifists and Peace Activists
http://www.peaceuniversalist.com/nobel/prize.htm
John Manning <johnrm@terra.com.br> wrote in message
news:3F21A01D.9090405@terra.com.br...
...or she is a crypto-fascist like Ann Coulter.
Ann Coulter (cartoon)
http://www.danzigercartoons.com/img/2003/dancart1719.jpg
Bush Deficit (simple chart from
congressional Office of Management and
Budget):
Note the Clinton 8 years of growth compared
to the Bush 2 1/2 years of historic drastic
deficit.
http://www.bartcop.com/chart-deficit-OMB.jpg
John Manning
.
|
|
|
| User: "Marie A." |
|
| Title: Re: Barbara Walker is a paid Bush propogandist... |
25 Jul 2003 10:05:05 PM |
|
|
"Mark Metzler" <mmetzler@sasquatch.com> wrote in message news:<vi3c94rn4ara94@corp.supernews.com>...
There is no question Barbara Walker (Rene) is a paid spammer.
There are plenty of right-wing zealots on the net, but nobody would
consistently
spam for so long unless they were paid.
(It should come as no surprise that Rene's other job is sending out email
ads for penis enlargement.)
The big question is why anyone would pay her to do such a crappy job?
For example, this post where she claims Democrats are losing ground in the
polls.
If you follow the link, you will see a whole list of polls, on this topic,
with narrow and statistically insignificant
differences between the parties, but nothing to suggest the Republicans are
doing better than the Democrats.
Perhaps Rene is just drunk. But I imagine Rene just doesn't give a damn
about Quality, Truth, or Integrity,
and just wants to make a lousy buck so she can buy some more wine.
John, I think she just enjoys giving you demmie imbeciles a good
*****-kicking every day. Just a hunch. (Marie)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Droopus" |
|
| Title: Re: Barbara Walker is a paid Bush propogandist... |
26 Jul 2003 12:34:56 PM |
|
|
(Marie A.) wrote in message news:<1dc521ed.0307251905.b4d9b49@posting.google.com>...
"Mark Metzler" <mmetzler@sasquatch.com> wrote in message news:<vi3c94rn4ara94@corp.supernews.com>...
There is no question Barbara Walker (Rene) is a paid spammer.
There are plenty of right-wing zealots on the net, but nobody would
consistently
spam for so long unless they were paid.
(It should come as no surprise that Rene's other job is sending out email
ads for penis enlargement.)
The big question is why anyone would pay her to do such a crappy job?
For example, this post where she claims Democrats are losing ground in the
polls.
If you follow the link, you will see a whole list of polls, on this topic,
with narrow and statistically insignificant
differences between the parties, but nothing to suggest the Republicans are
doing better than the Democrats.
Perhaps Rene is just drunk. But I imagine Rene just doesn't give a damn
about Quality, Truth, or Integrity,
and just wants to make a lousy buck so she can buy some more wine.
John, I think she just enjoys giving you demmie imbeciles a good
*****-kicking every day. Just a hunch. (Marie)
Hey Marie, can you send me some of that weed you're smoking? It must
be very sweet and tasty. B)
Diane might take the odd swipe with a furless knuckle at her opponents
(all of whom she assumes are Democrats for some bizarre reason), but I
haven't seen her do anything but change identities, forge addresses,
delete text dishonestly, (then lie about what was deleted,) and make
wild accusations like "Clinton made the federal deficit rise every
year he was in office."
If that's a good "***** kicking", let me bring you back to my old NYC
neighborhood and show you what a person looks like after a proper *****
kicking. One of their reactions typically is not issuing forth peals
of laughter.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Marie A." |
|
| Title: Re: Barbara Walker is a paid Bush propogandist... |
27 Jul 2003 05:57:27 PM |
|
|
(Droopus) wrote in message news:<55bfebbe.0307260934.165ffe9@posting.google.com>...
Hey Marie, can you send me some of that weed you're smoking? It must
be very sweet and tasty. B)
Diane might take the odd swipe with a furless knuckle at her opponents
(all of whom she assumes are Democrats for some bizarre reason), but I
haven't seen her do anything but change identities, forge addresses,
delete text dishonestly, (then lie about what was deleted,) and make
wild accusations like "Clinton made the federal deficit rise every
year he was in office."
If that's a good "***** kicking", let me bring you back to my old NYC
neighborhood and show you what a person looks like after a proper *****
kicking. One of their reactions typically is not issuing forth peals
of laughter.
Hey, Stupus, for someone who carries on like he's Nobel Prize
material, you're not too damn bright, are you? Do you leftist frauds
actually think that anyone with half a freakin' brain is impressed
with your crowd's never-ending bleats about trimming posts? Nothing is
deleted in here, moron, and you know it. Like, you don't know how to
use that scroll wheel on your mouse, hotshot? There you go!!!! See,
it's still there - just like magic!
For what it's worth, sir, if more people would trim posts to zero in
on those points they wish to address in impossibly long and convoluted
threads, they might actually get to have their repies read by others.
I personally won't scroll through ten pages of crap to read a recent
post, even from someone who interests me. And if I'm not clear on
something in a trimmed post, I scroll up and, PRESTO!, problem solved.
If you're actually suggesting that trimming posts is in any way
nefarious you're out of your mind. Oops, I take it back. You ARE out
of your mind - you're a liberal.
Cordially, Marie
.
|
|
|
| User: "Droopus" |
|
| Title: Re: Barbara Walker is a paid Bush propogandist... |
28 Jul 2003 01:24:38 AM |
|
|
(Marie A.) wrote in message news:<1dc521ed.0307271457.3bdbcc3a@posting.google.com>...
droopus714@netscape.net (Droopus) wrote in message news:<55bfebbe.0307260934.165ffe9@posting.google.com>...
Hey Marie, can you send me some of that weed you're smoking? It must
be very sweet and tasty. B)
Diane might take the odd swipe with a furless knuckle at her opponents
(all of whom she assumes are Democrats for some bizarre reason), but I
haven't seen her do anything but change identities, forge addresses,
delete text dishonestly, (then lie about what was deleted,) and make
wild accusations like "Clinton made the federal deficit rise every
year he was in office."
If that's a good "***** kicking", let me bring you back to my old NYC
neighborhood and show you what a person looks like after a proper *****
kicking. One of their reactions typically is not issuing forth peals
of laughter.
Hey, Stupus, for someone who carries on like he's Nobel Prize
material, you're not too damn bright, are you? Do you leftist frauds
actually think that anyone with half a freakin' brain is impressed
with your crowd's never-ending bleats about trimming posts? Nothing is
deleted in here, moron, and you know it. Like, you don't know how to
use that scroll wheel on your mouse, hotshot? There you go!!!! See,
it's still there - just like magic!
For what it's worth, sir, if more people would trim posts to zero in
on those points they wish to address in impossibly long and convoluted
threads, they might actually get to have their repies read by others.
I personally won't scroll through ten pages of crap to read a recent
post, even from someone who interests me. And if I'm not clear on
something in a trimmed post, I scroll up and, PRESTO!, problem solved.
If you're actually suggesting that trimming posts is in any way
nefarious you're out of your mind. Oops, I take it back. You ARE out
of your mind - you're a liberal.
Cordially, Marie
Tee hee this is a funny post. Consider, what I said:
" I haven't seen her do anything but change identities, forge
addresses, delete text dishonestly, (then lie about what was deleted,)
and make wild accusations like "Clinton made the federal deficit rise
every year he was in office."
Then Marie compalins about "deleting text." Nothing else.
That's kind of like saying,. "you're a lying, arrogant, picayune,
disingenuous, self-serving, hearthless, halitosis-ridden, overweight
*****" and getting the reply:
"Hey, I'm not fat."
heheh.
Marie, dear, I don't care if you delete 100 percent of a post if its
irrelevant. Just mark the deletion. It's an indicator that text has
been removed and a usenet tradition going back to the 70's. What the
hell is so difficult about typing [...] or <snip>? Hmm?
As for the scroll wheel, you assume everyone is at a dekstop, using
the same mouse as you, the same OS, the same news client, yada yada.
Did you know that web access to usenet is a somewhat recent
phenomenon?
Right now I'm posting from an OSX box with neither mouse buttons nor
scroll wheel. (No Macs have scroll wheels, unless they are third
party.) Neither do laptops. Neither do most Unix mouses. In addition,
I see you post using Google, as I sometimes do. But I also use news
software on everything from an SGI to a Linux box to a Mac with
Newswatcher or a Win box with Newsrover or Agent.
Don't assume everyone sees usenet the way you do. When I travel, I
only download new headers (as do many longime users.) They CAN'T just
"scroll up.
Delete all you want, I really don't care. Just mark the deletion.
Everyone does it. Go visit a comp.sys or news.admin group and see for
yourself. What's the big deal about following 30 year old usenet
conventions and typing in like four letters to mark the snip?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Marie A." |
|
| Title: Re: Barbara Walker is a paid Bush propogandist... |
28 Jul 2003 11:00:31 AM |
|
|
(Droopus) wrote in message news:<55bfebbe.0307272224.23a8d792@posting.google.com>...
LetEmEatWMDs@yahoo.com (Marie A.) wrote in message news:<1dc521ed.0307271457.3bdbcc3a@posting.google.com>...
(Droopus) wrote in message news:<55bfebbe.0307260934.165ffe9@posting.google.com>...
Hey Marie, can you send me some of that weed you're smoking? It must
be very sweet and tasty. B)
Diane might take the odd swipe with a furless knuckle at her opponents
(all of whom she assumes are Democrats for some bizarre reason), but I
haven't seen her do anything but change identities, forge addresses,
delete text dishonestly, (then lie about what was deleted,) and make
wild accusations like "Clinton made the federal deficit rise every
year he was in office."
If that's a good "***** kicking", let me bring you back to my old NYC
neighborhood and show you what a person looks like after a proper *****
kicking. One of their reactions typically is not issuing forth peals
of laughter.
Hey, Stupus, for someone who carries on like he's Nobel Prize
material, you're not too damn bright, are you? Do you leftist frauds
actually think that anyone with half a freakin' brain is impressed
with your crowd's never-ending bleats about trimming posts? Nothing is
deleted in here, moron, and you know it. Like, you don't know how to
use that scroll wheel on your mouse, hotshot? There you go!!!! See,
it's still there - just like magic!
For what it's worth, sir, if more people would trim posts to zero in
on those points they wish to address in impossibly long and convoluted
threads, they might actually get to have their repies read by others.
I personally won't scroll through ten pages of crap to read a recent
post, even from someone who interests me. And if I'm not clear on
something in a trimmed post, I scroll up and, PRESTO!, problem solved.
If you're actually suggesting that trimming posts is in any way
nefarious you're out of your mind. Oops, I take it back. You ARE out
of your mind - you're a liberal.
Cordially, Marie
Tee hee this is a funny post. Consider, what I said:
" I haven't seen her do anything but change identities, forge
addresses, delete text dishonestly, (then lie about what was deleted,)
and make wild accusations like "Clinton made the federal deficit rise
every year he was in office."
Then Marie compalins about "deleting text." Nothing else.
That's kind of like saying,. "you're a lying, arrogant, picayune,
disingenuous, self-serving, hearthless, halitosis-ridden, overweight
*****" and getting the reply:
"Hey, I'm not fat."
heheh.
Marie, dear, I don't care if you delete 100 percent of a post if its
irrelevant. Just mark the deletion. It's an indicator that text has
been removed and a usenet tradition going back to the 70's. What the
hell is so difficult about typing [...] or <snip>? Hmm?
As for the scroll wheel, you assume everyone is at a dekstop, using
the same mouse as you, the same OS, the same news client, yada yada.
Did you know that web access to usenet is a somewhat recent
phenomenon?
Right now I'm posting from an OSX box with neither mouse buttons nor
scroll wheel. (No Macs have scroll wheels, unless they are third
party.) Neither do laptops. Neither do most Unix mouses. In addition,
I see you post using Google, as I sometimes do. But I also use news
software on everything from an SGI to a Linux box to a Mac with
Newswatcher or a Win box with Newsrover or Agent.
Don't assume everyone sees usenet the way you do. When I travel, I
only download new headers (as do many longime users.) They CAN'T just
"scroll up.
Delete all you want, I really don't care. Just mark the deletion.
Everyone does it. Go visit a comp.sys or news.admin group and see for
yourself. What's the big deal about following 30 year old usenet
conventions and typing in like four letters to mark the snip?
A few points were well taken and you pointed out a few things I wasn't
aware of. I'm not a computer geek and use this merely to communicate,
research and as a library of sorts. The process doesn't at all
intrigue me. There's only so much I can cram into this brain, and I
guess it's too late in life for me to tackle yet another long learning
curve. But I do find it somewhat irritating that more people don't
snip these "four-screen" posts. Most people simply aren't going to
wade through that. I will, though, keep what you said in mind. Thanks.
(Marie)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Droopus" |
|
| Title: Re: Barbara Walker is a paid Bush propogandist... |
28 Jul 2003 05:25:52 PM |
|
|
(Marie A.) wrote in message news:<1dc521ed.0307280800.6b2334dc@posting.google.com>...
droopus714@netscape.net (Droopus) wrote in message news:<55bfebbe.0307272224.23a8d792@posting.google.com>...
(Marie A.) wrote in message news:<1dc521ed.0307271457.3bdbcc3a@posting.google.com>...
[...]
Marie, dear, I don't care if you delete 100 percent of a post if its
irrelevant. Just mark the deletion. It's an indicator that text has
been removed and a usenet tradition going back to the 70's. What the
hell is so difficult about typing [...] or <snip>? Hmm?
As for the scroll wheel, you assume everyone is at a dekstop, using
the same mouse as you, the same OS, the same news client, yada yada.
Did you know that web access to usenet is a somewhat recent
phenomenon?
Right now I'm posting from an OSX box with neither mouse buttons nor
scroll wheel. (No Macs have scroll wheels, unless they are third
party.) Neither do laptops. Neither do most Unix mouses. In addition,
I see you post using Google, as I sometimes do. But I also use news
software on everything from an SGI to a Linux box to a Mac with
Newswatcher or a Win box with Newsrover or Agent.
Don't assume everyone sees usenet the way you do. When I travel, I
only download new headers (as do many longime users.) They CAN'T just
"scroll up.
Delete all you want, I really don't care. Just mark the deletion.
Everyone does it. Go visit a comp.sys or news.admin group and see for
yourself. What's the big deal about following 30 year old usenet
conventions and typing in like four letters to mark the snip?
A few points were well taken and you pointed out a few things I wasn't
aware of. I'm not a computer geek and use this merely to communicate,
research and as a library of sorts.
As do many. That's why I'm not angry, just trying to educate. We all
had to learn this stuff at some point.
The process doesn't at all
intrigue me. There's only so much I can cram into this brain, and I
guess it's too late in life for me to tackle yet another long learning
curve. But I do find it somewhat irritating that more people don't
snip these "four-screen" posts.
Preaching to the choir, Marie. I HATE those silly long posts, and find
it irritating to download huge posts with a one line response at the
end. That's when editing is more than polite, it's essential. The only
thing that needs to be in a post is what's being debated. The rest?
Mark it and snip it.
Most people simply aren't going to
wade through that. I will, though, keep what you said in mind. Thanks.
(Marie)
And thank you for being civil as well. Much appreciated. B)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "James Hall" |
|
| Title: Re: Barbara Walker is a paid Bush propogandist... |
25 Jul 2003 06:36:59 PM |
|
|
"Mark Metzler" ...
There is no question Barbara Walker (Rene) is a paid spammer.
There are plenty of right-wing zealots on the net, but nobody would
consistently
spam for so long unless they were paid.
(It should come as no surprise that Rene's other job is sending out email
ads for penis enlargement.)
The big question is why anyone would pay her to do such a crappy job?
For example, this post where she claims Democrats are losing ground in
the
polls.
If you follow the link, you will see a whole list of polls, on this
topic,
with narrow and statistically insignificant
differences between the parties, but nothing to suggest the Republicans
are
doing better than the Democrats.
Perhaps Rene is just drunk. But I imagine Rene just doesn't give a damn
about Quality, Truth, or Integrity,
and just wants to make a lousy buck so she can buy some more wine.
As long as rene, please don't walk away, or babs baby suck good
***** does anything else matter, especially if she is a fascist republico
wannabe ?
Come on Mark one must make one's choices on what is available
not on what one wishes.
JHall
"Firearms do not kill, the dead ate the bullets".
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "JoettaB" |
|
| Title: Re: Barbara Walker is a paid Bush propogandist... |
26 Jul 2003 12:20:04 AM |
|
|
I vote for B. Unfortunately, I have supported the input of computer in
mental health facilities. I am now rethinking the wisdom of such support.
"Droopus" <droopus714@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:55bfebbe.0307251837.3e06e38f@posting.google.com...
"Mark Metzler" <mmetzler@sasquatch.com> wrote in message
news:<vi3c94rn4ara94@corp.supernews.com>...
There is no question Barbara Walker (Rene) is a paid spammer.
There are plenty of right-wing zealots on the net, but nobody would
consistently
spam for so long unless they were paid.
(It should come as no surprise that Rene's other job is sending out
email
ads for penis enlargement.)
The big question is why anyone would pay her to do such a crappy job?
For example, this post where she claims Democrats are losing ground in
the
polls.
If you follow the link, you will see a whole list of polls, on this
topic,
with narrow and statistically insignificant
differences between the parties, but nothing to suggest the Republicans
are
doing better than the Democrats.
Perhaps Rene is just drunk. But I imagine Rene just doesn't give a damn
about Quality, Truth, or Integrity,
and just wants to make a lousy buck so she can buy some more wine.
She already has plenty of whine. yukyukyuk
Imagine this for a second. Sure it's easy to dismiss her as a paid RNC
troll. But what if the reverse were true?
No one in their right mind would look at her posts and say "my, what
well-written, thoughtful discourse. I would be proud to associate
myself with someone of her obvious brilliant insight."
No they think 'Phew, what a loony" and send another $50 to Howard
Dean.
Look, I loathe Dimson and all his little minions and hope we can
somehow send his ***** home to Connect---, uh Texas, where perhaps he
can spend his dotage marveling at the wonder of escalator travel. But
Rene/Barbara/Diane is probably the best advertising the DNC could hope
for:
"Do you want to be associated with THIS?"
I see three possibilities:
A) She is a paid RNC troll (Bad move)
B) She is a paid DNC troll (Pretty slick)
C) She is just a whack job with too much free time. (I'm doubtful.
Even the most zealous don't post in the vast quantities she does.)
I'm starting to lean towards B. Occam's Razor and all that......
.
|
|
|
| User: "JoettaB" |
|
| Title: Re: Barbara Walker is a paid Bush propogandist... |
26 Jul 2003 10:04:43 AM |
|
|
Oppps... I meant C.... I musta been in a Florida voting booth when I posted.
"JoettaB" <joetta_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:-aGdnQAUcPwVkr-iXTWJjQ@wideopenwest.com...
I vote for B. Unfortunately, I have supported the input of computer in
mental health facilities. I am now rethinking the wisdom of such support.
"Droopus" <droopus714@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:55bfebbe.0307251837.3e06e38f@posting.google.com...
"Mark Metzler" <mmetzler@sasquatch.com> wrote in message
news:<vi3c94rn4ara94@corp.supernews.com>...
There is no question Barbara Walker (Rene) is a paid spammer.
There are plenty of right-wing zealots on the net, but nobody would
consistently
spam for so long unless they were paid.
(It should come as no surprise that Rene's other job is sending out
email
ads for penis enlargement.)
The big question is why anyone would pay her to do such a crappy job?
For example, this post where she claims Democrats are losing ground
in
the
polls.
If you follow the link, you will see a whole list of polls, on this
topic,
with narrow and statistically insignificant
differences between the parties, but nothing to suggest the
Republicans
are
doing better than the Democrats.
Perhaps Rene is just drunk. But I imagine Rene just doesn't give a
damn
about Quality, Truth, or Integrity,
and just wants to make a lousy buck so she can buy some more wine.
She already has plenty of whine. yukyukyuk
Imagine this for a second. Sure it's easy to dismiss her as a paid RNC
troll. But what if the reverse were true?
No one in their right mind would look at her posts and say "my, what
well-written, thoughtful discourse. I would be proud to associate
myself with someone of her obvious brilliant insight."
No they think 'Phew, what a loony" and send another $50 to Howard
Dean.
Look, I loathe Dimson and all his little minions and hope we can
somehow send his ***** home to Connect---, uh Texas, where perhaps he
can spend his dotage marveling at the wonder of escalator travel. But
Rene/Barbara/Diane is probably the best advertising the DNC could hope
for:
"Do you want to be associated with THIS?"
I see three possibilities:
A) She is a paid RNC troll (Bad move)
B) She is a paid DNC troll (Pretty slick)
C) She is just a whack job with too much free time. (I'm doubtful.
Even the most zealous don't post in the vast quantities she does.)
I'm starting to lean towards B. Occam's Razor and all that......
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Frog" |
|
| Title: Re: Barbara Walker is a paid Bush propogandist... |
26 Jul 2003 08:32:15 AM |
|
|
On 25 Jul 2003 19:37:34 -0700, (Droopus)
wrote:
"Mark Metzler" <mmetzler@sasquatch.com> wrote in message news:<vi3c94rn4ara94@corp.supernews.com>...
There is no question Barbara Walker (Rene) is a paid spammer.
There are plenty of right-wing zealots on the net, but nobody would
consistently
spam for so long unless they were paid.
(It should come as no surprise that Rene's other job is sending out email
ads for penis enlargement.)
The big question is why anyone would pay her to do such a crappy job?
For example, this post where she claims Democrats are losing ground in the
polls.
If you follow the link, you will see a whole list of polls, on this topic,
with narrow and statistically insignificant
differences between the parties, but nothing to suggest the Republicans are
doing better than the Democrats.
Perhaps Rene is just drunk. But I imagine Rene just doesn't give a damn
about Quality, Truth, or Integrity,
and just wants to make a lousy buck so she can buy some more wine.
She already has plenty of whine. yukyukyuk
Imagine this for a second. Sure it's easy to dismiss her as a paid RNC
troll. But what if the reverse were true?
No one in their right mind would look at her posts and say "my, what
well-written, thoughtful discourse. I would be proud to associate
myself with someone of her obvious brilliant insight."
No they think 'Phew, what a loony" and send another $50 to Howard
Dean.
Look, I loathe Dimson and all his little minions and hope we can
somehow send his ***** home to Connect---, uh Texas, where perhaps he
can spend his dotage marveling at the wonder of escalator travel. But
Rene/Barbara/Diane is probably the best advertising the DNC could hope
for:
"Do you want to be associated with THIS?"
I see three possibilities:
A) She is a paid RNC troll (Bad move)
B) She is a paid DNC troll (Pretty slick)
C) She is just a whack job with too much free time. (I'm doubtful.
Even the most zealous don't post in the vast quantities she does.)
I'm starting to lean towards B. Occam's Razor and all that......
You asserted in the subject line a statement of fact.
what evidence do you have?
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"The multicultural project will never fully succeed if 'diversity'
is defined as one's own preferred ideologies and political groups."
--Richard E. Redding, "Grappling With Diverse Conceptions of Diversity,"
American Psychologist, April 2002, p. 301.
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Hall" |
|
| Title: Re: Barbara Walker is a paid Bush propogandist... |
27 Jul 2003 03:49:01 PM |
|
|
"The Frog" ...
...
You asserted in the subject line a statement of fact.
what evidence do you have?
Ohhh about the same as the moron has regarding weapons
up his anal tract.
JHall.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Frog" |
|
| Title: Re: Barbara Walker is a paid Bush propogandist... |
27 Jul 2003 09:44:58 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 16:49:01 -0400, "James Hall" <jhall@cuic.ca>
wrote:
"The Frog" ...
...
You asserted in the subject line a statement of fact.
what evidence do you have?
Ohhh about the same as the moron has regarding weapons
up his anal tract.
Did you just make up something as a personal attack?
Is that your idea of discussion?
pathetic. (really)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"The multicultural project will never fully succeed if 'diversity'
is defined as one's own preferred ideologies and political groups."
--Richard E. Redding, "Grappling With Diverse Conceptions of Diversity,"
American Psychologist, April 2002, p. 301.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Droopus" |
|
| Title: Re: Barbara Walker is a paid Bush propogandist... |
26 Jul 2003 12:45:11 PM |
|
|
The Frog <jmattNOSPAM@ticnet.com> wrote in message news:<ml05iv4ht7eenhdu4c8658itc3pfegfgou@4ax.com>...
On 25 Jul 2003 19:37:34 -0700, (Droopus)
wrote:
"Mark Metzler" <mmetzler@sasquatch.com> wrote in message news:<vi3c94rn4ara94@corp.supernews.com>...
There is no question Barbara Walker (Rene) is a paid spammer.
There are plenty of right-wing zealots on the net, but nobody would
consistently
spam for so long unless they were paid.
(It should come as no surprise that Rene's other job is sending out email
ads for penis enlargement.)
The big question is why anyone would pay her to do such a crappy job?
For example, this post where she claims Democrats are losing ground in the
polls.
If you follow the link, you will see a whole list of polls, on this topic,
with narrow and statistically insignificant
differences between the parties, but nothing to suggest the Republicans are
doing better than the Democrats.
Perhaps Rene is just drunk. But I imagine Rene just doesn't give a damn
about Quality, Truth, or Integrity,
and just wants to make a lousy buck so she can buy some more wine.
She already has plenty of whine. yukyukyuk
Imagine this for a second. Sure it's easy to dismiss her as a paid RNC
troll. But what if the reverse were true?
No one in their right mind would look at her posts and say "my, what
well-written, thoughtful discourse. I would be proud to associate
myself with someone of her obvious brilliant insight."
No they think 'Phew, what a loony" and send another $50 to Howard
Dean.
Look, I loathe Dimson and all his little minions and hope we can
somehow send his ***** home to Connect---, uh Texas, where perhaps he
can spend his dotage marveling at the wonder of escalator travel. But
Rene/Barbara/Diane is probably the best advertising the DNC could hope
for:
"Do you want to be associated with THIS?"
I see three possibilities:
A) She is a paid RNC troll (Bad move)
B) She is a paid DNC troll (Pretty slick)
C) She is just a whack job with too much free time. (I'm doubtful.
Even the most zealous don't post in the vast quantities she does.)
I'm starting to lean towards B. Occam's Razor and all that......
You asserted in the subject line a statement of fact.
what evidence do you have?
Froggie, my post is only a followup: I neither wrote, nor do I agree
with the subject line. If you look a few lines above this, you'll see
I have a few suppositions, the least likely of which is that Diane is
a paid Bush propagandist. One thing Bush has done is surround himself
with smart people, not semi-literate trolls. I don't think any Bush
money goes to her.
As I said...I lean towards option B, that she is actually a DNC troll,
trying to make Republicans look bad. (I am neither Republican nor
Democrat, personally. I vote for candidates, not parties.)
If she is really doing all that work on her own volition, posting
under scores of identities, posting hundreds of times a day, and
impersonating some woman in Texas (when her IP is obviously from MA)
then she needs to get a life, and perhaps some professional care. But
I still think she is encouraged and possibly paid by increasingly
worried DNC operatives who want to make the Repubs look bad.
Your mileage may vary.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill" |
|
| Title: Re: Barbara Walker is a paid Bush propogandist... |
27 Jul 2003 10:20:06 AM |
|
|
You're suggesting there's someone out there stupid enough to actually
pay someone to post that drivel?
.
|
|
|
| User: "JoettaB" |
|
| Title: Re: Barbara Walker is a paid Bush propogandist... |
27 Jul 2003 12:47:02 PM |
|
|
"Bill" <bwillis8@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:3t58ivo2e89rirfah0fpm50t6h24j96qgu@4ax.com...
You're suggesting there's someone out there stupid enough to actually
pay someone to post that drivel?
AND... let's not forget that someone is paying Rush.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mitchell Holman" |
|
| Title: Re: Barbara Walker is a paid Bush propogandist... |
27 Jul 2003 02:43:00 PM |
|
|
"JoettaB" <joetta_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in news:krydnfAyjL-
KjbmiXTWJkA@wideopenwest.com:
"Bill" <bwillis8@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:3t58ivo2e89rirfah0fpm50t6h24j96qgu@4ax.com...
You're suggesting there's someone out there stupid enough to actually
pay someone to post that drivel?
AND... let's not forget that someone is paying Rush.
Unfortunately, we all are. Armed Forces Radio
and all that.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill" |
|
| Title: Re: Barbara Walker is a paid Bush propogandist... |
28 Jul 2003 11:04:25 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 13:47:02 -0400, "JoettaB"
<joetta_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote:
"Bill" <bwillis8@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:3t58ivo2e89rirfah0fpm50t6h24j96qgu@4ax.com...
You're suggesting there's someone out there stupid enough to actually
pay someone to post that drivel?
AND... let's not forget that someone is paying Rush.
Yes, but there's a difference. Rush, agree with him or not, is
actually very good at what he does.
.
|
|
|
| User: "JoettaB" |
|
| Title: Re: Barbara Walker is a paid Bush propogandist... |
16 Aug 2003 04:39:39 PM |
|
|
"Bill" <bwillis8@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:pssaivc6pvkklbro16jr47uulk4i2tt5bi@4ax.com...
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 13:47:02 -0400, "JoettaB"
<joetta_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote:
"Bill" <bwillis8@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:3t58ivo2e89rirfah0fpm50t6h24j96qgu@4ax.com...
You're suggesting there's someone out there stupid enough to actually
pay someone to post that drivel?
AND... let's not forget that someone is paying Rush.
Yes, but there's a difference. Rush, agree with him or not, is
actually very good at what he does.
hahahaha....It's easy for Rush to be good at being an idiot!
JoettaB
.
|
|
|
| User: "Doug" |
|
| Title: Re: Barbara Walker is a paid Bush propogandist... |
17 Aug 2003 12:43:34 AM |
|
|
hahahaha....It's easy for Rush to be good at being an idiot!
JoettaB
Yeah, all he has to do is impersonate Bill Clinochicco or any other
demoncrat!
.
|
|
|
| User: "ehollo" |
|
| Title: Re: Barbara Walker is a paid Bush propogandist... |
17 Aug 2003 01:50:47 AM |
|
|
Just add her to your "block sender" list. She's
an embarassment to her party.
"JoettaB" <joetta_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1vCdnb3bpdZDg6KiXTWJjA@wideopenwest.com...
"Doug" <dhall76@nospamcitlink.net> wrote in message
news:aCE%a.2943$0A1.928@news01.roc.ny...
hahahaha....It's easy for Rush to be good at being an idiot!
JoettaB
Yeah, all he has to do is impersonate Bill Clinochicco or any other
demoncrat!
Yes, he's certainly a comedian.
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Hall" |
|
| Title: babs walker Is An Embarrassment PERIOD. |
18 Aug 2003 10:05:14 PM |
|
|
"ehollo" <ehollo@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:bBF%a.6831$Bo6.1813@nwrddc03.gnilink.net...
Just add her to your "block sender" list. She's
an embarassment to her party.
"JoettaB" <joetta_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1vCdnb3bpdZDg6KiXTWJjA@wideopenwest.com...
"Doug" <dhall76@nospamcitlink.net> wrote in message
news:aCE%a.2943$0A1.928@news01.roc.ny...
hahahaha....It's easy for Rush to be good at being an idiot!
JoettaB
Yeah, all he has to do is impersonate Bill Clinochicco or any other
demoncrat!
Yes, he's certainly a comedian.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "JoettaB" |
|
| Title: Re: Barbara Walker is a paid Bush propogandist... |
17 Aug 2003 11:40:44 AM |
|
|
Doesn't work to add her to a block list when others continue to reply to
her. And.. I was replying to Doug, not Barbara in this instance. :-)
JoettaB
--Ability is not determined by four walls.
"ehollo" <ehollo@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:bBF%a.6831$Bo6.1813@nwrddc03.gnilink.net...
Just add her to your "block sender" list. She's
an embarassment to her party.
"JoettaB" <joetta_bragg@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1vCdnb3bpdZDg6KiXTWJjA@wideopenwest.com...
"Doug" <dhall76@nospamcitlink.net> wrote in message
news:aCE%a.2943$0A1.928@news01.roc.ny...
hahahaha....It's easy for Rush to be good at being an idiot!
JoettaB
Yeah, all he has to do is impersonate Bill Clinochicco or any other
demoncrat!
Yes, he's certainly a comedian.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Figaro" |
|
| Title: Re: Barbara Walker is a paid Bush propogandist... |
27 Jul 2003 10:42:54 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 15:20:06 GMT, Bill <bwillis8@optonline.net> wrote:
You're suggesting there's someone out there stupid enough to actually
pay someone to post that drivel?
Why not? Didn't Random House pay the Coulter shitbag to publish HER
drivel? Didn't MSNBC pay Michael Wiener to ejaculate all over the
airwaves? So what's so unbelievable about BW getting some republican
small change tossed into her tin cup? I only hope it's enough to cover
the cost of exposing her stupidity in public.
Figaro
.
|
|
|
| User: "JC Martin" |
|
| Title: Re: Barbara Walker is a paid Bush propogandist... |
27 Jul 2003 02:48:24 PM |
|
|
"Figaro" <figaro@satx.rr.com> wrote in message
news:arr7iv0tb50e8037habpho8d0o5jtl9o19@4ax.com...
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 15:20:06 GMT, Bill <bwillis8@optonline.net> wrote:
You're suggesting there's someone out there stupid enough to actually
pay someone to post that drivel?
Why not? Didn't Random House pay the Coulter shitbag to publish HER
drivel? Didn't MSNBC pay Michael Wiener to ejaculate all over the
airwaves? So what's so unbelievable about BW getting some republican
small change tossed into her tin cup?
Because Barbara (or whoever that is) is about 100 times dumber.
-JC
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill" |
|
| Title: Re: Barbara Walker is a paid Bush propogandist... |
28 Jul 2003 11:02:18 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 10:42:54 -0500, Figaro <figaro@satx.rr.com> wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 15:20:06 GMT, Bill <bwillis8@optonline.net> wrote:
You're suggesting there's someone out there stupid enough to actually
pay someone to post that drivel?
Why not? Didn't Random House pay the Coulter shitbag to publish HER
drivel? Didn't MSNBC pay Michael Wiener to ejaculate all over the
airwaves? So what's so unbelievable about BW getting some republican
small change tossed into her tin cup? I only hope it's enough to cover
the cost of exposing her stupidity in public.
If you're going to hire a flak, you send him someplace where he can
influence opinions and introduce issues into the debate. You don't
send him to usenet newsgroups, a place where the chances of finding
someone who hasn't yet made up their mind is virtually nil.
As for Random House and MSNBC, I think their primary motive in
promoting Coulter and "Savage" was to make money. I can't imagine
anyone's making money from usenet trolls.
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Hall" |
|
| Title: Re: Barbara Walker is a paid Bush propogandist... |
28 Jul 2003 02:16:01 PM |
|
|
"Bill" ...
...
I can't imagine anyone's making money from usenet trolls.
On Usenet every one is a troll and no one wins.
JHall.
.
|
|
|
| User: "JoettaB" |
|
| Title: Re: Barbara Walker is a paid Bush propogandist... |
28 Jul 2003 11:00:41 PM |
|
|
Sure, we can all win. It's called "unsubscribe."
"James Hall" <jhall@cuic.ca> wrote in message
news:KDeVa.29$3j5.13970536@news.nnrp.ca...
"Bill" ...
...
I can't imagine anyone's making money from usenet trolls.
On Usenet every one is a troll and no one wins.
JHall.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
