| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Harry Hope" |
| Date: |
19 Sep 2005 08:44:27 AM |
| Object: |
B..b..b..but, Georgie...um, how, exactly, are you going to pay for that? |
Much to Bush's consternation, uttering the words "I take
responsibility" did not miraculously make everything better.
Eventually it became apparent that he would need to do more to help
the victims of the Hurricane, and to improve his flagging approval
ratings.
So on Thursday he held a televised address to the nation in which he
promised "one of the largest reconstruction efforts the world has ever
seen."
Some in the president's own party estimated that Bush's reconstruction
proposals would cost more than the war in Iraq, hundreds of billions
of dollars.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/16/national/nationalspecial/16bush.html?pagewanted=2
There once was a time when a massive increase in spending such as this
would cause some killjoy, green-eyeshade, bean-counter types to ask,
sheepishly, "um, how, exactly, are you going to pay for that?"
As you well know, that time is long past.
Cough, cough.
http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/09/27/clinton.surplus/
Our country is now so ridiculously far beyond the point where
government revenues no longer cover our expenses, that it is laughable
to even bother worrying about it.
In 2004, the federal budget deficit was a record $412 billion.
Throw in the money for Hurricane Katrina reconstruction, and the
deficit might as well be "$800 gajillion" because actual numbers no
longer matter.
It's all just a massive pile of IOUs to foreign creditors, which we
will foist upon future generations of Americans without their consent.
So, what the heck, how about if we just go ahead and pass another
massive tax cut for the rich?
Now would be the perfect time!
In fact, let's just get rid of taxes altogether.
Instead, we'll keep on spending more and more, and we'll keep
borrowing more money from foreign banks.
And when those foreign banks ask us to pay the interest (or, God
forbid, the principal) on their loans, we'll just take out more loans
from more banks.
It'll be the world's greatest pyramid scheme!
If we're lucky, we will all be dead before anyone figures out that
someone has to actually pay for all this borrowing.
To my nieces and nephews and children and grandchildren and
great-grandchildren, all I have to say is, "Ha! In your face,
suckers!"
From The Democratic Underground
http://www.democraticunderground.com/
Harry
.
|
|
| User: "Tom B. Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: B..b..b..but, Georgie...um, how, exactly, are you going to pay for that? |
19 Sep 2005 09:28:06 AM |
|
|
Harry Hope <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:l5gti11087ff2jhf8rbqs9nm05p0ig4kqk@4ax.com:
Much to Bush's consternation, uttering the words "I take
responsibility" did not miraculously make everything better.
Eventually it became apparent that he would need to do more to help
the victims of the Hurricane, and to improve his flagging approval
ratings.
So on Thursday he held a televised address to the nation in which he
promised "one of the largest reconstruction efforts the world has ever
seen."
Some in the president's own party estimated that Bush's reconstruction
proposals would cost more than the war in Iraq, hundreds of billions
of dollars.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/16/national/nationalspecial/16bush.html?
pagewanted=2
There once was a time when a massive increase in spending such as this
would cause some killjoy, green-eyeshade, bean-counter types to ask,
sheepishly, "um, how, exactly, are you going to pay for that?"
As you well know, that time is long past.
Cough, cough.
http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/09/27/clinton.surplus/
Our country is now so ridiculously far beyond the point where
government revenues no longer cover our expenses, that it is laughable
to even bother worrying about it.
In 2004, the federal budget deficit was a record $412 billion.
Throw in the money for Hurricane Katrina reconstruction, and the
deficit might as well be "$800 gajillion" because actual numbers no
longer matter.
It's all just a massive pile of IOUs to foreign creditors, which we
will foist upon future generations of Americans without their consent.
So, what the heck, how about if we just go ahead and pass another
massive tax cut for the rich?
Now would be the perfect time!
In fact, let's just get rid of taxes altogether.
Instead, we'll keep on spending more and more, and we'll keep
borrowing more money from foreign banks.
And when those foreign banks ask us to pay the interest (or, God
forbid, the principal) on their loans, we'll just take out more loans
from more banks.
It'll be the world's greatest pyramid scheme!
If we're lucky, we will all be dead before anyone figures out that
someone has to actually pay for all this borrowing.
To my nieces and nephews and children and grandchildren and
great-grandchildren, all I have to say is, "Ha! In your face,
suckers!"
From The Democratic Underground
http://www.democraticunderground.com/
Harry
This legacy of the Bush administration, along with all of the other
horrble mismanagement for short term gain at the expense of the country's
future, is what will condemn him as the "Worst President Ever" in the
history books for all time. I would really like to see an honest
appraisal of Bush's accomplishments (other than his record breaking
vacation schedule). Come on now. I've seen the "Bush haters" list of
his failures, and they are many, but I really haven't seen a list of
accomplishments that have been truly beneficial in the long run for the
average American citizen. I guess you could say that the three hundred
dollar check you got in tax rebate a couple of years ago, that was spent
on "made in China" stuff at Wal Mart, is something. But has that cut been
beneficial in the long run? OK, you're buying gas with it now while the
oil companies and the Saudis are rolling in dough. But what has the
administration of Mr. Bush done to improve the quality of life in this
country for the average man or woman. Give me a lasting legacy of
greatness that can be attached to this president. Don't strain yourself
now.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dennis M" |
|
| Title: Re: B..b..b..but, Georgie...um, how, exactly, are you going to pay for that? |
19 Sep 2005 10:18:41 AM |
|
|
In article <l5gti11087ff2jhf8rbqs9nm05p0ig4kqk@4ax.com>, Harry Hope
<rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
There once was a time when a massive increase in spending such as this
would cause some killjoy, green-eyeshade, bean-counter types to ask,
sheepishly, "um, how, exactly, are you going to pay for that?"
As you well know, that time is long past.
A crazy aunt in the basement with tax-cut-and-spenders running the Bates Motel.
And when those foreign banks ask us to pay the interest (or, God
forbid, the principal) on their loans, we'll just take out more loans
from more banks.
It'll be the world's greatest pyramid scheme!
One of the right-wingers' favorite catch phrases, at least in a different
context.
.
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
What? No WMD? b..b..b..b..but, Georgie, you said that................................ Hey, Georgie Boy, you can veto a bill. But you can't veto the truth. Hey, Georgie, we had record mass layoffs in January. But I thought you said...................................................................... Li'l Georgie has a...um....Iraq victory plan...but he's...uh...gotta keep it quiet, ya see Georgie won't mess with camels, but oh those sheep! Georgie Bush sez he wishes he could help us but................................................... Li'l Georgie Bush can run but he can't hide Georgie Bush talks like a cowboy, but he rides a rocking horse.
| Georgie can't catch Osama, but........ The Afghan opium war heats up. But where's Osama, Georgie? But at least Georgie didn't get a *****, right? Gasoline problems? Well, Georgie feels your pain but................................ "I told them everything," sez Georgie, but we'll never really know that, will we. Georgie went AWOL but 25-year veteran faces punishment for questioning waiver Don't look now, Georgie, but it looks like Brazil has joined the axis of evil.
|
|
|