| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"J. Hyderman" |
| Date: |
09 Jan 2006 12:43:52 PM |
| Object: |
Bill O'Reilly Getting Nuttier? |
Bill O'Reilly, angry over what he perceives to be personal attacks by the
mainstream media, publicly threatened to expose details of the personal
lives of two New York Times employees - Executive Editor Bill Keller and
opinion columnist Frank Rich.
On January 2nd's O'Reilly Factor, in the course of an interview with two
political strategists, he said this: "Because everybody fears them but both
of those men have led lives and if they want to attack people personally -
Rich in print and Keller allowing it - then we're gonna have to just show
everybody about their lives."
O'Reilly declared before Christmas his intention of creating a list of
"left-wing smear merchants." One wonders if this time he's gone too far in
his jihad against perceived enemies of the Bush administration and FOX News.
http://tinyurl.com/bcdwf
That's O'Reilly, fighting hard against anyone attempting to hold the White
House accountable for anything at all.
.
|
|
| User: "George Harrison" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill O'Reilly Getting Nuttier? |
09 Jan 2006 02:33:05 PM |
|
|
O'Reilly needs a good beating to break him
away from his frequent immature tantrums.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jafo" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill O'Reilly Getting Nuttier? |
09 Jan 2006 12:47:59 PM |
|
|
As viewed from alt.california, J. Hyderman wrote:
Bill O'Reilly, angry over what he perceives to be personal attacks
by the mainstream media, publicly threatened to expose details of
the personal lives of two New York Times employees - Executive
Editor Bill Keller and opinion columnist Frank Rich.
On January 2nd's O'Reilly Factor, in the course of an interview with
two political strategists, he said this: "Because everybody fears
them but both of those men have led lives and if they want to attack
people personally - Rich in print and Keller allowing it - then
we're gonna have to just show everybody about their lives."
O'Reilly declared before Christmas his intention of creating a list
of "left-wing smear merchants." One wonders if this time he's gone
too far in his jihad against perceived enemies of the Bush
administration and FOX News.
Jeez, you'd think he was some kind of Democrat or something.
--
Jafo
.
|
|
|
| User: "Karl" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill O'Reilly Getting Nuttier? |
09 Jan 2006 07:08:28 PM |
|
|
"Jafo" <a@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:irb5s19eqdd6i1b1iqpsgghj0b7dis9ojv@4ax.com...
As viewed from alt.california, J. Hyderman wrote:
Bill O'Reilly, angry over what he perceives to be personal attacks
by the mainstream media, publicly threatened to expose details of
the personal lives of two New York Times employees - Executive
Editor Bill Keller and opinion columnist Frank Rich.
On January 2nd's O'Reilly Factor, in the course of an interview with
two political strategists, he said this: "Because everybody fears
them but both of those men have led lives and if they want to attack
people personally - Rich in print and Keller allowing it - then
we're gonna have to just show everybody about their lives."
O'Reilly declared before Christmas his intention of creating a list
of "left-wing smear merchants." One wonders if this time he's gone
too far in his jihad against perceived enemies of the Bush
administration and FOX News.
Jeez, you'd think he was some kind of Democrat or something.
Let the guy go off on these guys. Who cares? I keep thinking about The
Godfather where Roth tells Michael "this is the life we chose" Well this
people in the media and politics, they know this is the life they chose.
O'Reilly wants to dig dirt fine. If he wants to try and organize a black
list go ahead and good luck, big waste of time.
Everyone has secrets. And guess what O'Reilly fans everyone has been
looking for them since long before O'Reilly suggested it.
We all just have to embrace the mudslinging...makes for great TV!
--
Jafo
.
|
|
|
| User: "Julian D." |
|
| Title: Re: Bill O'Reilly Getting Nuttier? |
09 Jan 2006 09:55:48 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:08:28 -0500, "Karl" <karlwtz@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Jafo" <a@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:irb5s19eqdd6i1b1iqpsgghj0b7dis9ojv@4ax.com...
As viewed from alt.california, J. Hyderman wrote:
Bill O'Reilly, angry over what he perceives to be personal attacks
by the mainstream media, publicly threatened to expose details of
the personal lives of two New York Times employees - Executive
Editor Bill Keller and opinion columnist Frank Rich.
On January 2nd's O'Reilly Factor, in the course of an interview with
two political strategists, he said this: "Because everybody fears
them but both of those men have led lives and if they want to attack
people personally - Rich in print and Keller allowing it - then
we're gonna have to just show everybody about their lives."
O'Reilly declared before Christmas his intention of creating a list
of "left-wing smear merchants." One wonders if this time he's gone
too far in his jihad against perceived enemies of the Bush
administration and FOX News.
Jeez, you'd think he was some kind of Democrat or something.
Let the guy go off on these guys. Who cares? I keep thinking about The
Godfather where Roth tells Michael "this is the life we chose" Well this
people in the media and politics, they know this is the life they chose.
O'Reilly wants to dig dirt fine. If he wants to try and organize a black
list go ahead and good luck, big waste of time.
Actually, it's not. This is no liberal call to boycott, which usually
gets ignored.
Everyone has secrets. And guess what O'Reilly fans everyone has been
looking for them since long before O'Reilly suggested it.
We all just have to embrace the mudslinging...makes for great TV!
--
Jafo
Julian D.
"But if we must engage in a national debate on half-measures:
After 9/11, any president who was not spying on people calling
phone numbers associated with terrorists should be impeached for
being an inept commander in chief."
-Ann Coulter
"The president and I cannot prevent certain politicians from losing
their memory, or their backbone, but we're not going to sit by and
let them rewrite history." -- ***** Cheney 11/16/2005
"If somebody from al-Qaida is calling you, we'd like to know why."
- President George W. Bush - January 1, 2006
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Alric Knebel" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill O'Reilly Getting Nuttier? |
14 Jan 2006 02:35:39 AM |
|
|
J. Hyderman wrote:
Bill O'Reilly, angry over what he perceives to be personal attacks by the
mainstream media, publicly threatened to expose details of the personal
lives of two New York Times employees - Executive Editor Bill Keller and
opinion columnist Frank Rich.
On January 2nd's O'Reilly Factor, in the course of an interview with two
political strategists, he said this: "Because everybody fears them but both
of those men have led lives and if they want to attack people personally -
Rich in print and Keller allowing it - then we're gonna have to just show
everybody about their lives."
O'Reilly declared before Christmas his intention of creating a list of
"left-wing smear merchants." One wonders if this time he's gone too far in
his jihad against perceived enemies of the Bush administration and FOX News.
http://tinyurl.com/bcdwf
That's O'Reilly, fighting hard against anyone attempting to hold the White
House accountable for anything at all.
I don't know how the guy gets ratings anymore. He's so smug,
self-righteous, and pious he's down right boring. It's like watching a
nasty grandmother ***** about how the pickle contest was fixed.
--
Alric Knebel
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Pervert" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill O'Reilly Getting Nuttier? |
14 Jan 2006 02:54:58 AM |
|
|
"Alric Knebel" <alric@[cableone.net]> wrote in message
news:11shduo26cekn3e@corp.supernews.com...
I don't know how the guy gets ratings anymore.
Apparently he's more entertaining to his audiences than his competition.
That's how any show gets ratings.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alric Knebel" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill O'Reilly Getting Nuttier? |
15 Jan 2006 05:41:10 PM |
|
|
The Pervert wrote:
"Alric Knebel" <alric@[cableone.net]> wrote in message
news:11shduo26cekn3e@corp.supernews.com...
I don't know how the guy gets ratings anymore.
Apparently he's more entertaining to his audiences than his competition.
That's how any show gets ratings.
Yeah, but so does WWE wrestling. That it gets ratings reflects the
intelligence of the audience and says nothing about the quality of the show.
--
Alric
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Pervert" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill O'Reilly Getting Nuttier? |
16 Jan 2006 02:13:51 PM |
|
|
"Alric Knebel" <alric@[cableone.net]> wrote in message
news:11slncm59gbpp78@corp.supernews.com...
The Pervert wrote:
"Alric Knebel" <alric@[cableone.net]> wrote in message
news:11shduo26cekn3e@corp.supernews.com...
I don't know how the guy gets ratings anymore.
Apparently he's more entertaining to his audiences than his competition.
That's how any show gets ratings.
Yeah, but so does WWE wrestling. That it gets ratings reflects the
intelligence of the audience and says nothing about the quality of the
show.
Perhaps. I don't watch the show myself, considering O'Reilly to be a
blowhard.
You asked a question. I gave you the answer. You don't like it? Doesn't
mean anything to me. Neither does your silly commentary.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alric Knebel" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill O'Reilly Getting Nuttier? |
16 Jan 2006 08:54:57 PM |
|
|
The Pervert wrote:
"Alric Knebel" <alric@[cableone.net]> wrote in message
news:11slncm59gbpp78@corp.supernews.com...
The Pervert wrote:
"Alric Knebel" <alric@[cableone.net]> wrote in message
news:11shduo26cekn3e@corp.supernews.com...
I don't know how the guy gets ratings anymore.
Apparently he's more entertaining to his audiences than his competition.
That's how any show gets ratings.
Yeah, but so does WWE wrestling. That it gets ratings reflects the
intelligence of the audience and says nothing about the quality of the
show.
Perhaps. I don't watch the show myself, considering O'Reilly to be a
blowhard.
You asked a question. I gave you the answer. You don't like it? Doesn't
mean anything to me. Neither does your silly commentary.
I didn't ask a question. You provided a defense, and I showed you what
a lame defense it was. That you dismissed it as silly doesn't make it
any less accurate. Again, your inability to appreciate the truth of it
reflects on YOU.
--
Alric Knebel
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Pervert" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill O'Reilly Getting Nuttier? |
17 Jan 2006 03:21:37 AM |
|
|
"Alric Knebel" <alric@[cableone.net]> wrote in message
news:11son40lmkst346@corp.supernews.com...
The Pervert wrote:
"Alric Knebel" <alric@[cableone.net]> wrote in message
news:11slncm59gbpp78@corp.supernews.com...
The Pervert wrote:
"Alric Knebel" <alric@[cableone.net]> wrote in message
news:11shduo26cekn3e@corp.supernews.com...
I don't know how the guy gets ratings anymore.
Apparently he's more entertaining to his audiences than his
competition.
That's how any show gets ratings.
Yeah, but so does WWE wrestling. That it gets ratings reflects the
intelligence of the audience and says nothing about the quality of the
show.
Perhaps. I don't watch the show myself, considering O'Reilly to be a
blowhard.
You asked a question. I gave you the answer. You don't like it?
Doesn't
mean anything to me. Neither does your silly commentary.
I didn't ask a question. You provided a defense, and I showed you what
a lame defense it was. That you dismissed it as silly doesn't make it
any less accurate. Again, your inability to appreciate the truth of it
reflects on YOU.
--
Alric Knebel
I stand corrected. You posed a silly query.
Other than that, you're still full of *****.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alric Knebel" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill O'Reilly Getting Nuttier? |
17 Jan 2006 05:26:34 AM |
|
|
The Pervert wrote:
"Alric Knebel" <alric@[cableone.net]> wrote in message
news:11son40lmkst346@corp.supernews.com...
The Pervert wrote:
"Alric Knebel" <alric@[cableone.net]> wrote in message
news:11slncm59gbpp78@corp.supernews.com...
The Pervert wrote:
"Alric Knebel" <alric@[cableone.net]> wrote in message
news:11shduo26cekn3e@corp.supernews.com...
I don't know how the guy gets ratings anymore.
Apparently he's more entertaining to his audiences than his
competition.
That's how any show gets ratings.
Yeah, but so does WWE wrestling. That it gets ratings reflects the
intelligence of the audience and says nothing about the quality of the
show.
Perhaps. I don't watch the show myself, considering O'Reilly to be a
blowhard.
You asked a question. I gave you the answer. You don't like it?
Doesn't
mean anything to me. Neither does your silly commentary.
I didn't ask a question. You provided a defense, and I showed you what
a lame defense it was. That you dismissed it as silly doesn't make it
any less accurate. Again, your inability to appreciate the truth of it
reflects on YOU.
--
Alric Knebel
I stand corrected. You posed a silly query.
Other than that, you're still full of *****.
No, you moron, you have NOT been corrected. I never posed a silly
query. I never posed a query at all. You're just too stupid to see
what I'm saying. As I suspected.
--
Alric Knebel
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Joe S." |
|
| Title: Re: Bill O'Reilly Getting Nuttier? |
14 Jan 2006 07:26:34 PM |
|
|
"Alric Knebel" <alric@[cableone.net]> wrote in message
news:11shduo26cekn3e@corp.supernews.com...
J. Hyderman wrote:
Bill O'Reilly, angry over what he perceives to be personal attacks by the
mainstream media, publicly threatened to expose details of the personal
lives of two New York Times employees - Executive Editor Bill Keller and
opinion columnist Frank Rich.
On January 2nd's O'Reilly Factor, in the course of an interview with two
political strategists, he said this: "Because everybody fears them but
both of those men have led lives and if they want to attack people
personally - Rich in print and Keller allowing it - then we're gonna have
to just show everybody about their lives."
O'Reilly declared before Christmas his intention of creating a list of
"left-wing smear merchants." One wonders if this time he's gone too far
in his jihad against perceived enemies of the Bush administration and FOX
News.
http://tinyurl.com/bcdwf
That's O'Reilly, fighting hard against anyone attempting to hold the
White House accountable for anything at all.
I don't know how the guy gets ratings anymore. He's so smug,
self-righteous, and pious he's down right boring. It's like watching a
nasty grandmother ***** about how the pickle contest was fixed.
--
Alric Knebel
O'Reilly's ratings are not a mystery -- no one ever went broke
underestimating the intelligence of a major portion of the public.
O'Reilly, Rush, Hannity, Coulter -- they know that there are enough stupid
people to keep them in dope, loofa sponges, and luxury condos for the rest
of their lives. Ditto for Pat Robertson, Falwell, Dobson, and the rest of
the nutty "religious right."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rick Hohensee" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill O'Reilly Getting Nuttier? |
14 Jan 2006 05:31:01 AM |
|
|
In article <11shduo26cekn3e@corp.supernews.com>,
Alric Knebel <"[alric]"@[cableone.net]> wrote:
J. Hyderman wrote:
Bill O'Reilly, angry over what he perceives to be personal attacks by the
mainstream media, publicly threatened to expose details of the personal
lives of two New York Times employees - Executive Editor Bill Keller and
opinion columnist Frank Rich.
On January 2nd's O'Reilly Factor, in the course of an interview with two
political strategists, he said this: "Because everybody fears them but both
of those men have led lives and if they want to attack people personally -
Rich in print and Keller allowing it - then we're gonna have to just show
everybody about their lives."
O'Reilly declared before Christmas his intention of creating a list of
"left-wing smear merchants." One wonders if this time he's gone too far in
his jihad against perceived enemies of the Bush administration and FOX News.
http://tinyurl.com/bcdwf
That's O'Reilly, fighting hard against anyone attempting to hold the White
House accountable for anything at all.
I don't know how the guy gets ratings anymore. He's so smug,
self-righteous, and pious he's down right boring. It's like watching a
nasty grandmother ***** about how the pickle contest was fixed.
It's the ***** Network. There are a lot of assholes out there, and
Rupert Murdoch KNOWS what they like.
--
Alric Knebel
.
|
|
|
| User: "grinder" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill O'Reilly Getting Nuttier? |
14 Jan 2006 04:29:00 PM |
|
|
"Rick Hohensee" <humbubba@smart.net> wrote in message
news:11sho7lp15t7g78@corp.supernews.com...
In article <11shduo26cekn3e@corp.supernews.com>,
Alric Knebel <"[alric]"@[cableone.net]> wrote:
J. Hyderman wrote:
I don't know how the guy gets ratings anymore. He's so smug,
self-righteous, and pious he's down right boring. It's like watching a
nasty grandmother ***** about how the pickle contest was fixed.
But if it were not for that he would have no talent at all.
.
|
|
|
| User: "E.E.Bud Keith" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill O'Reilly Getting Nuttier? |
14 Jan 2006 04:44:09 PM |
|
|
"grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid> wrote in message
news:MWeyf.5014$WY5.4024@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Rick Hohensee" <humbubba@smart.net> wrote in message
news:11sho7lp15t7g78@corp.supernews.com...
In article <11shduo26cekn3e@corp.supernews.com>,
Alric Knebel <"[alric]"@[cableone.net]> wrote:
J. Hyderman wrote:
I don't know how the guy gets ratings anymore. He's so smug,
self-righteous, and pious he's down right boring. It's like watching a
nasty grandmother ***** about how the pickle contest was fixed.
But if it were not for that he would have no talent at all.
Do you hate him because with no talent he manages to have a larger audience
then every liberal with a similar program. The next thing you are going to
tell us is that his several million listners are all wrong and you of
course are right right right, I think thats called arrogance.
.
|
|
|
| User: "grinder" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill O'Reilly Getting Nuttier? |
14 Jan 2006 08:36:28 PM |
|
|
"E.E.Bud Keith" <budk101@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:MbmdnXjSacot41TeRVn-vA@comcast.com...
"grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid> wrote in message
news:MWeyf.5014$WY5.4024@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Rick Hohensee" <humbubba@smart.net> wrote in message
news:11sho7lp15t7g78@corp.supernews.com...
In article <11shduo26cekn3e@corp.supernews.com>,
Alric Knebel <"[alric]"@[cableone.net]> wrote:
J. Hyderman wrote:
I don't know how the guy gets ratings anymore. He's so smug,
self-righteous, and pious he's down right boring. It's like watching a
nasty grandmother ***** about how the pickle contest was fixed.
But if it were not for that he would have no talent at all.
Do you hate him because with no talent he manages to have a larger
audience then every liberal with a similar program. The next thing you are
going to tell us is that his several million listners are all wrong and
you of course are right right right, I think thats called arrogance.
LOL. Of course you know that Fox PAYS stations to put him on air. BTW, you
are prime example of his "audience." Someone who prefers professional
wrestling to amateur wrestling. Someone who cannot put two sentences
together without making multiple mistakes. So grab a chaw, go back to your
hollar and play a few tunes on your banjo.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Alric Knebel" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill O'Reilly Getting Nuttier? |
15 Jan 2006 05:44:12 PM |
|
|
E.E.Bud Keith wrote:
"grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid> wrote in message
news:MWeyf.5014$WY5.4024@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Rick Hohensee" <humbubba@smart.net> wrote in message
news:11sho7lp15t7g78@corp.supernews.com...
In article <11shduo26cekn3e@corp.supernews.com>,
Alric Knebel <"[alric]"@[cableone.net]> wrote:
J. Hyderman wrote:
I don't know how the guy gets ratings anymore. He's so smug,
self-righteous, and pious he's down right boring. It's like watching a
nasty grandmother ***** about how the pickle contest was fixed.
But if it were not for that he would have no talent at all.
Do you hate him because with no talent he manages to have a larger audience
then every liberal with a similar program. The next thing you are going to
tell us is that his several million listners are all wrong and you of
course are right right right, I think thats called arrogance.
There are no liberals with a similar program.
As for the audience, it's not several million. There are 280 million
people in the United States. About a million watch or listen to him.
And I hear his radio show is on the verge of cancellation.
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Pervert" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill O'Reilly Getting Nuttier? |
16 Jan 2006 02:16:31 PM |
|
|
"Alric Knebel" <alric@[cableone.net]> wrote in message
news:11slnib47gvif67@corp.supernews.com...
E.E.Bud Keith wrote:
"grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid> wrote in message
news:MWeyf.5014$WY5.4024@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Rick Hohensee" <humbubba@smart.net> wrote in message
news:11sho7lp15t7g78@corp.supernews.com...
In article <11shduo26cekn3e@corp.supernews.com>,
Alric Knebel <"[alric]"@[cableone.net]> wrote:
J. Hyderman wrote:
I don't know how the guy gets ratings anymore. He's so smug,
self-righteous, and pious he's down right boring. It's like watching
a
nasty grandmother ***** about how the pickle contest was fixed.
But if it were not for that he would have no talent at all.
Do you hate him because with no talent he manages to have a larger
audience
then every liberal with a similar program. The next thing you are going
to
tell us is that his several million listners are all wrong and you of
course are right right right, I think thats called arrogance.
There are no liberals with a similar program.
Apparently, not enough people want such a program.
As for the audience, it's not several million. There are 280 million
people in the United States. About a million watch or listen to him.
And I hear his radio show is on the verge of cancellation.
--
What do you hear about Air America?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alric Knebel" |
|
| Title: Re: Bill O'Reilly Getting Nuttier? |
16 Jan 2006 08:58:09 PM |
|
|
The Pervert wrote:
"Alric Knebel" <alric@[cableone.net]> wrote in message
news:11slnib47gvif67@corp.supernews.com...
E.E.Bud Keith wrote:
"grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid> wrote in message
news:MWeyf.5014$WY5.4024@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Rick Hohensee" <humbubba@smart.net> wrote in message
news:11sho7lp15t7g78@corp.supernews.com...
In article <11shduo26cekn3e@corp.supernews.com>,
Alric Knebel <"[alric]"@[cableone.net]> wrote:
J. Hyderman wrote:
I don't know how the guy gets ratings anymore. He's so smug,
self-righteous, and pious he's down right boring. It's like watching
a
nasty grandmother ***** about how the pickle contest was fixed.
But if it were not for that he would have no talent at all.
Do you hate him because with no talent he manages to have a larger
audience
then every liberal with a similar program. The next thing you are going
to
tell us is that his several million listners are all wrong and you of
course are right right right, I think thats called arrogance.
There are no liberals with a similar program.
Apparently, not enough people want such a program.
Actually, there is an audience for it. When Phil Donahue's show was
canceled, he had the highest rated program on MSNBC. They executives
didn't want to go into the war against Iraq with someone questioning it.
You can look that up.
Besides, are you pie holes claiming that ALL of the media is liberal?
That would on its face disprove your own assertion.
As for the audience, it's not several million. There are 280 million
people in the United States. About a million watch or listen to him.
And I hear his radio show is on the verge of cancellation.
What do you hear about Air America?
That it's doing fine.
--
Alric Knebel
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
