British MPs tell Blair to stick his no charge detainment.



 Politics > Politics-USA > British MPs tell Blair to stick his no charge detainment.

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: "Black Elk"
Date: 10 Nov 2005 08:02:08 PM
Object: British MPs tell Blair to stick his no charge detainment.
Apparently British backbones are stiffer than American.
---
10 November 2005 18:51
Cabinet rallies to defiant Blair as criticism mounts
By Andrew Grice, Political Editor
Published: 11 November 2005
Tony Blair branded the rebel Labour MPs who defeated his anti-terrorism law
"out of touch" as he rebuffed their demands for him to become a listening
prime minister.
An uncompromising Mr Blair told the Cabinet yesterday that there was a gulf
between MPs who rejected police requests for power to detain terrorist
suspects for up to 90 days without charge and the reality of terror threats.
Cabinet ministers rallied to Mr Blair, but senior backbenchers were furious
about his comments and warned he must "listen more" to secure planned
changes to education, health and welfare. Some rebels privately likened him
to an "out-of-touch" Margaret Thatcher in the period before she was ousted
in 1990.
David Winnick, a Labour MP who successfully proposed a 28-day detention
limit on Wednesday, said: "The idea that those of us who voted for 28 days -
the majority of MPs - don't understand the terrorist threat, that we are
soft on terror and don't understand the menace from the mass murderers ...is
poisonous nonsense. Not one single life of those innocent people murdered on
7 July would have been saved if it was 90 days."
-cont.-
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/article326332.ece
--
Even though the Republicans are typically the party associated with big
business, it turns out that the market returns generated under Democratic
administrations have outperformed those of Republican administrations.
http://polls.yahoo.com/public/archives/57019568/p-quote-371
--
The fair use of a copyrighted work:
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site
is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
.


  Page 1 of 1


Related Articles
Re: U.S. WAR CRIMES- TIME TO CHARGE THEM
Michigan GOP Congressman's Charge May Spark Inquiry
Should We Put Saddam Back in Charge?
Rove told facing perjury charge; will resign if indicted
Porn Charge for Child Welfare Official
Why no past action at Walter Reed? Simple. Republicans were in charge.
Scalia's Daughter Pleads Guilty to DUI Charge
Security in Baghdad deteriorating by the hour, unclear who's in charge
Republican defends Schumer from right-wing mud-slinging charge of anti-Catholic bias
Rightist talker Williams was sued in a massive $200,000 50-charge sexual harassment suit
Christian woman nailed with Muslim blasphemy charge for defending cross
lunatics in charge of the Democratic asylum
Who's really in charge at the White House?
US soldiers face war crime charge
ON 9-11, GUESS WHO WAS IN CHARGE OF AIRPORT SECURITY ?
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER