| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"MadDad" |
| Date: |
07 Apr 2004 05:28:00 PM |
| Object: |
Bush! Don't go into Najaf |
Look, Bush, you knucklehead, Najaf is a holy city to Islam. Just because al
Sadr is holed up there doesn't give enough reason to go in - it will set off
Armageddon! So hold the Army and Marines before they go into Najaf.
.
|
|
| User: "Steven Litvintchouk" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush! Don't go into Najaf |
07 Apr 2004 06:48:14 PM |
|
|
MadDad wrote:
Look, Bush, you knucklehead, Najaf is a holy city to Islam. Just because al
Sadr is holed up there doesn't give enough reason to go in - it will set off
Armageddon!
The U.S. will lose the war if we act like there's any part of Iraq that
is off-limits to Americans.
Because guess what, whichever areas we declare off-limits will be
exactly those areas that our enemies will choose as their sanctuaries.
The Muslims didn't worry about "setting off Armageddon" when they bombed
New York City and Washington DC. (Had the USSR done that during the
Cold War, we would have nuked them in retaliation.)
Stop worrying about "provoking" the Iraqis. The Iraqis should be
worried about provoking us.
-- Steven L.
.
|
|
|
| User: "NoPlutocracyUSA" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush! Don't go into Najaf |
07 Apr 2004 09:43:05 PM |
|
|
"Steven Litvintchouk" <sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net> wrote in message
news:2r0dc.481$l75.140@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
MadDad wrote:
Look, Bush, you knucklehead, Najaf is a holy city to Islam. Just because
al
Sadr is holed up there doesn't give enough reason to go in - it will set
off
Armageddon!
The U.S. will lose the war if we act like there's any part of Iraq that
is off-limits to Americans.
Because guess what, whichever areas we declare off-limits will be
exactly those areas that our enemies will choose as their sanctuaries.
The Muslims didn't worry about "setting off Armageddon" when they bombed
New York City and Washington DC. (Had the USSR done that during the
Cold War, we would have nuked them in retaliation.)
The "Muslims" that were 9/11 terrorists had nothing to do with Iraq. Your
own idol Bush said it as clearly as that in September 2003.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Corey" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush! Don't go into Najaf |
07 Apr 2004 10:12:06 PM |
|
|
"NoPlutocracyUSA" <person332XFG400201@adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:Msidna89J5bFIendRVn-gg@adelphia.com...
"Steven Litvintchouk" <sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net> wrote in message
news:2r0dc.481$l75.140@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
MadDad wrote:
Look, Bush, you knucklehead, Najaf is a holy city to Islam. Just
because
al
Sadr is holed up there doesn't give enough reason to go in - it will
set
off
Armageddon!
The U.S. will lose the war if we act like there's any part of Iraq that
is off-limits to Americans.
Because guess what, whichever areas we declare off-limits will be
exactly those areas that our enemies will choose as their sanctuaries.
The Muslims didn't worry about "setting off Armageddon" when they bombed
New York City and Washington DC. (Had the USSR done that during the
Cold War, we would have nuked them in retaliation.)
The "Muslims" that were 9/11 terrorists had nothing to do with Iraq. Your
own idol Bush said it as clearly as that in September 2003.
Corey Says-
Are you sure?
http://www.nyc99.com/weblog/000349.html end.
.
|
|
|
| User: "NoPlutocracyUSA" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush! Don't go into Najaf |
07 Apr 2004 10:44:54 PM |
|
|
"Corey" <upyoursvirusgeek@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:aq3dc.47699$q71.14367@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com...
"NoPlutocracyUSA" <person332XFG400201@adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:Msidna89J5bFIendRVn-gg@adelphia.com...
"Steven Litvintchouk" <sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net> wrote in message
news:2r0dc.481$l75.140@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
MadDad wrote:
Look, Bush, you knucklehead, Najaf is a holy city to Islam. Just
because
al
Sadr is holed up there doesn't give enough reason to go in - it will
set
off
Armageddon!
The U.S. will lose the war if we act like there's any part of Iraq
that
is off-limits to Americans.
Because guess what, whichever areas we declare off-limits will be
exactly those areas that our enemies will choose as their sanctuaries.
The Muslims didn't worry about "setting off Armageddon" when they
bombed
New York City and Washington DC. (Had the USSR done that during the
Cold War, we would have nuked them in retaliation.)
The "Muslims" that were 9/11 terrorists had nothing to do with Iraq.
Your
own idol Bush said it as clearly as that in September 2003.
Corey Says-
Are you sure?
http://www.nyc99.com/weblog/000349.html end.
NoPlutocracyUSA Says-
Yes.
http://www.thememoryhole.org/war/no-saddam-qaeda.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "crimsontide" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush! Don't go into Najaf |
08 Apr 2004 09:48:32 AM |
|
|
Its really semantics. There is no difference between Sadr and the
Ayatollahs in Iran, the PLO, the Taliban etc. They are all backwards mutts
that will only stop when thier pulse also stops. The idea that not
offending these people will make a difference is dangerous. "weakness is
provocative".
"NoPlutocracyUSA" <person332XFG400201@adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:-oKdnVGC_Y5IV-ndRVn-iQ@adelphia.com...
"Corey" <upyoursvirusgeek@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:aq3dc.47699$q71.14367@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com...
"NoPlutocracyUSA" <person332XFG400201@adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:Msidna89J5bFIendRVn-gg@adelphia.com...
"Steven Litvintchouk" <sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net> wrote in message
news:2r0dc.481$l75.140@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
MadDad wrote:
Look, Bush, you knucklehead, Najaf is a holy city to Islam. Just
because
al
Sadr is holed up there doesn't give enough reason to go in - it
will
set
off
Armageddon!
The U.S. will lose the war if we act like there's any part of Iraq
that
is off-limits to Americans.
Because guess what, whichever areas we declare off-limits will be
exactly those areas that our enemies will choose as their
sanctuaries.
The Muslims didn't worry about "setting off Armageddon" when they
bombed
New York City and Washington DC. (Had the USSR done that during the
Cold War, we would have nuked them in retaliation.)
The "Muslims" that were 9/11 terrorists had nothing to do with Iraq.
Your
own idol Bush said it as clearly as that in September 2003.
Corey Says-
Are you sure?
http://www.nyc99.com/weblog/000349.html end.
NoPlutocracyUSA Says-
Yes.
http://www.thememoryhole.org/war/no-saddam-qaeda.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bring em ON! Bringemon@I too want to know the facts.com" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush! Don't go into Najaf |
08 Apr 2004 06:07:33 PM |
|
|
"crimsontide" <vanguard90@bigfoot.com> wrote in message
news:iradnekbW_726OjdRVn-vA@comcast.com...
Its really semantics. There is no difference between Sadr and the
Ayatollahs in Iran, the PLO, the Taliban etc. They are all backwards
mutts
that will only stop when thier pulse also stops. The idea that not
offending these people will make a difference is dangerous. "weakness is
provocative".
I am for an all out war between the United States and whoever...Islam, the
Chinese, Korea...whatever keep them occupied, weakened and off the street
makes the rest of us safer.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jingo" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush! Don't go into Najaf |
08 Apr 2004 06:08:45 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 8 Apr 2004 10:48:32 -0400, "crimsontide"
<vanguard90@bigfoot.com> wrote:
Its really semantics. There is no difference between Sadr and the
Ayatollahs in Iran, the PLO, the Taliban etc. They are all backwards mutts
that will only stop when thier pulse also stops. The idea that not
offending these people will make a difference is dangerous. "weakness is
provocative".
"It is the fight between tiger and elephant. If the tiger stands his
ground, the elephant will crush him with its mass. But, if he
conserves his mobility, he will finally vanquish the elephant, who
bleeds from a multitude of cuts."
--Ho Chi Minh
"After President Bush was elected, we were briefed by the Clinton
"Administration on many national security issues during the transition.
The President-elect and I were briefed by George Tenet on terrorism and
on the al-Qaida network. Members of Sandy Berger's NSC staff briefed me,
along with other members of the new national security team, on
counterterrorism and al-Qaida. This briefing lasted about one hour, and
it reviewed the Clinton Administration's counterterrorism approach and
the various counterterrorism activities then underway. Sandy and I
personally discussed a variety of other topics, including North Korea,
Iraq, the Middle East, and the Balkans."
--Condi "under Oath and singing a different tune" Rice
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michel" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush! Don't go into Najaf |
14 Apr 2004 06:40:38 PM |
|
|
crimsontide wrote:
Its really semantics. There is no difference between Sadr and the
Ayatollahs in Iran, the PLO, the Taliban etc. They are all backwards mutts
that will only stop when thier pulse also stops. The idea that not
offending these people will make a difference is dangerous. "weakness is
provocative".
Be ready to be fully provoked any time soon, then!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jingo" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush! Don't go into Najaf |
08 Apr 2004 06:07:50 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 7 Apr 2004 19:43:05 -0700, "NoPlutocracyUSA"
<person332XFG400201@adelphia.net> wrote:
"Steven Litvintchouk" <sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net> wrote in message
news:2r0dc.481$l75.140@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
MadDad wrote:
Look, Bush, you knucklehead, Najaf is a holy city to Islam. Just because
al
Sadr is holed up there doesn't give enough reason to go in - it will set
off
Armageddon!
The U.S. will lose the war if we act like there's any part of Iraq that
is off-limits to Americans.
Because guess what, whichever areas we declare off-limits will be
exactly those areas that our enemies will choose as their sanctuaries.
The Muslims didn't worry about "setting off Armageddon" when they bombed
New York City and Washington DC. (Had the USSR done that during the
Cold War, we would have nuked them in retaliation.)
The "Muslims" that were 9/11 terrorists had nothing to do with Iraq. Your
own idol Bush said it as clearly as that in September 2003.
"It is the fight between tiger and elephant. If the tiger stands his
ground, the elephant will crush him with its mass. But, if he
conserves his mobility, he will finally vanquish the elephant, who
bleeds from a multitude of cuts."
--Ho Chi Minh
"After President Bush was elected, we were briefed by the Clinton
"Administration on many national security issues during the transition.
The President-elect and I were briefed by George Tenet on terrorism and
on the al-Qaida network. Members of Sandy Berger's NSC staff briefed me,
along with other members of the new national security team, on
counterterrorism and al-Qaida. This briefing lasted about one hour, and
it reviewed the Clinton Administration's counterterrorism approach and
the various counterterrorism activities then underway. Sandy and I
personally discussed a variety of other topics, including North Korea,
Iraq, the Middle East, and the Balkans."
--Condi "under Oath and singing a different tune" Rice
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bring em ON! Bringemon@I too want to know the facts.com" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush! Don't go into Najaf |
08 Apr 2004 06:05:16 PM |
|
|
"Steven Litvintchouk" <sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net> wrote in message
news:2r0dc.481$l75.140@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
MadDad wrote:
Look, Bush, you knucklehead, Najaf is a holy city to Islam. Just because
al
Sadr is holed up there doesn't give enough reason to go in - it will set
off
Armageddon!
The U.S. will lose the war.....
quit while you are ahead.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
