Bush faces his own Nixon moment



 Politics > Politics-USA > Bush faces his own Nixon moment

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: "Harry Hope"
Date: 09 Jun 2005 02:17:09 PM
Object: Bush faces his own Nixon moment
From The Hartford Advocate, 6/9/05:
http://hartfordadvocate.com/gbase/News/content?oid=oid:114875
Deep Gloat
Bush faces his own Nixon moment
by Alan Bisbort - June 9, 2005
http://hartfordadvocate.com/binary/114875-273-1/world-4585.jpeg

To George W. Bush's increasing dismay, there are only so many Michael
Jacksons and runaway brides to go around.
As Our Fearless Leader pedals his Pee Wee Herman bike more maniacally
than usual these days, he's in desperate need of another monumentally
weird news story to distract the nation "bigtime," as ***** Cheney
would say.
His approval ratings are in the low 40s (in the 30s on Social
Security);
Iraq refuses to behave the way he fantasized it;
Congress has defied him on stem cells and lunatic-fringe judges;
John Bolton and his moustache are on ice;
prisoners have been tortured on his watch;
dead bodies are piled in mounds everywhere he looks.
Poor boy.
It's a wonder he doesn't just hide out on his ranch with his pillow
over his head blissfully ignoring reality the way he ignored classes
at Yale, his military commitment, his failed businesses, even his
baseball team.
If things get any worse, he may have to rename his ranch
NeverNeverLand and invite young boys in for sleepovers.
Barely having dipped his toe into the pond of his second term, GWB is
already a lame duck.
He'll be even lamer when the Democrats retake the Congress in 2006, at
which point there's a remote possibility that, well, let's not get
ahead of ourselves.
Which is why he doesn't need any monumentally weird news stories about
Watergate hogging headlines in his lapdog press.
George W. Bush is facing his Nixon Moment.
Indeed, the revelation of the identity of Deep Throat this past week
was a national wake-up call.
It was a reminder of just how far "investigative journalism" has
fallen in this nation, where the best of that formerly celebrated
breed are working at cartoon magazines (Sy Hersh at the New Yorker),
as an exile in England (Greg Palast), as a satirist (Jon Stewart and
The Daily Show) or wielding a camera (Michael Moore).
If a Deep Throat with close White House ties were today to funnel the
truth to the press corps, half of the reporters would soil their
britches in fright and the other half would run and rat him out to
Massuh Rove.
We got a glimpse of that dynamic when longtime White House insider --
a Republican, no less -- Richard Clarke spilled the beans on Bush's
bungling the war on terror.
Rather than address the issues of national importance Clarke raised in
his book, the media focused on Clarke's "motives."
The dynamic was the same before the war began.
Only a fool or blindly partisan hack thought attacking Iraq was
justified.
As Daily Kos notes, "The only thing surprising about the Iraq
occupation is that it has so persistently mirrored what war critics
predicted; a rapid military 'win,' followed by a Vietnam-like
insurgency that bogs down U.S. forces and destabilizes any nascent
attempts at self-government. That's not horn-tooting; anyone not fully
under the spell of yay! war could see it coming ten miles off."
Yet, the media turned it into a he said/she said proposition.
They presented, as "he said," the White House's insistence that Saddam
had WMDs and posed an immediate threat to U.S. security, as well as
the unchallenged innuendo that he had a connection to the terrorists
that carried out the 9/11 attacks.
On the "she said" side, you had Hans Blix, Scott Ritter, the United
Nations, all of our traditional sissie allies and most of the rest of
the world begging, cajoling, screaming NO.
Though one side was clearly lying -- the very definition of high
crimes and misdemeanors -- their version was always given (more than)
equal weight.
In fact, the New York Times colluded with the lying side, via Judith
Miller's criminally misleading reportage of Saddam's WMD cache, and
Bob Novak was an outright accomplice to treason by revealing the name,
at the White House's bidding, of an undercover CIA agent, compromising
national security.
Worst of all, Bob Woodward, one of the titans of Watergate, became
George W. Bush's biggest wartime cheerleader.
So much for our press.
George W. Bush needs another runaway bride, not this collective
gloating over Deep Throat.
That's because Watergate equals impeachment. We don't want to be
thinking impeachment right now.
Why?
Because no president in American history is more impeachable than
George W. Bush.
There has not been such high crimes and misdemeanors, such chicanery,
manipulation, murder and looting since, well, ever.
Nixon's crime was the cover up, not the initial act.
Bush's crimes are so numerous that any cover up, including ones
willingly aided by a national press obsessed with Michael Jackson's
sexual psychosis and hillbilly brides, will ultimately fail.
It has been said that the six-year witch hunt of Bill Clinton was
payback for Watergate.
But, if indeed there is a predictable trajectory to our national Greek
tragedy, the payback for Clinton will be an even bigger *****.
Let the impeachment begin.
______________________________________________________
Harry
.

User: "Latenight"

Title: Re: Bush faces his own Nixon moment 09 Jun 2005 06:31:19 PM
Right on!
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:cd5ha15v2mg37l9es4unlg983v68cbqtcj@4ax.com...


From The Hartford Advocate, 6/9/05:
http://hartfordadvocate.com/gbase/News/content?oid=oid:114875

Deep Gloat

Bush faces his own Nixon moment

by Alan Bisbort - June 9, 2005

http://hartfordadvocate.com/binary/114875-273-1/world-4585.jpeg


To George W. Bush's increasing dismay, there are only so many Michael
Jacksons and runaway brides to go around.

As Our Fearless Leader pedals his Pee Wee Herman bike more maniacally
than usual these days, he's in desperate need of another monumentally
weird news story to distract the nation "bigtime," as ***** Cheney
would say.

His approval ratings are in the low 40s (in the 30s on Social
Security);

Iraq refuses to behave the way he fantasized it;

Congress has defied him on stem cells and lunatic-fringe judges;

John Bolton and his moustache are on ice;

prisoners have been tortured on his watch;

dead bodies are piled in mounds everywhere he looks.

Poor boy.

It's a wonder he doesn't just hide out on his ranch with his pillow
over his head blissfully ignoring reality the way he ignored classes
at Yale, his military commitment, his failed businesses, even his
baseball team.

If things get any worse, he may have to rename his ranch
NeverNeverLand and invite young boys in for sleepovers.

Barely having dipped his toe into the pond of his second term, GWB is
already a lame duck.

He'll be even lamer when the Democrats retake the Congress in 2006, at
which point there's a remote possibility that, well, let's not get
ahead of ourselves.

Which is why he doesn't need any monumentally weird news stories about
Watergate hogging headlines in his lapdog press.

George W. Bush is facing his Nixon Moment.

Indeed, the revelation of the identity of Deep Throat this past week
was a national wake-up call.

It was a reminder of just how far "investigative journalism" has
fallen in this nation, where the best of that formerly celebrated
breed are working at cartoon magazines (Sy Hersh at the New Yorker),
as an exile in England (Greg Palast), as a satirist (Jon Stewart and
The Daily Show) or wielding a camera (Michael Moore).

If a Deep Throat with close White House ties were today to funnel the
truth to the press corps, half of the reporters would soil their
britches in fright and the other half would run and rat him out to
Massuh Rove.

We got a glimpse of that dynamic when longtime White House insider --
a Republican, no less -- Richard Clarke spilled the beans on Bush's
bungling the war on terror.

Rather than address the issues of national importance Clarke raised in
his book, the media focused on Clarke's "motives."

The dynamic was the same before the war began.

Only a fool or blindly partisan hack thought attacking Iraq was
justified.

As Daily Kos notes, "The only thing surprising about the Iraq
occupation is that it has so persistently mirrored what war critics
predicted; a rapid military 'win,' followed by a Vietnam-like
insurgency that bogs down U.S. forces and destabilizes any nascent
attempts at self-government. That's not horn-tooting; anyone not fully
under the spell of yay! war could see it coming ten miles off."

Yet, the media turned it into a he said/she said proposition.

They presented, as "he said," the White House's insistence that Saddam
had WMDs and posed an immediate threat to U.S. security, as well as
the unchallenged innuendo that he had a connection to the terrorists
that carried out the 9/11 attacks.

On the "she said" side, you had Hans Blix, Scott Ritter, the United
Nations, all of our traditional sissie allies and most of the rest of
the world begging, cajoling, screaming NO.

Though one side was clearly lying -- the very definition of high
crimes and misdemeanors -- their version was always given (more than)
equal weight.

In fact, the New York Times colluded with the lying side, via Judith
Miller's criminally misleading reportage of Saddam's WMD cache, and
Bob Novak was an outright accomplice to treason by revealing the name,
at the White House's bidding, of an undercover CIA agent, compromising
national security.

Worst of all, Bob Woodward, one of the titans of Watergate, became
George W. Bush's biggest wartime cheerleader.

So much for our press.

George W. Bush needs another runaway bride, not this collective
gloating over Deep Throat.

That's because Watergate equals impeachment. We don't want to be
thinking impeachment right now.

Why?

Because no president in American history is more impeachable than
George W. Bush.

There has not been such high crimes and misdemeanors, such chicanery,
manipulation, murder and looting since, well, ever.

Nixon's crime was the cover up, not the initial act.

Bush's crimes are so numerous that any cover up, including ones
willingly aided by a national press obsessed with Michael Jackson's
sexual psychosis and hillbilly brides, will ultimately fail.

It has been said that the six-year witch hunt of Bill Clinton was
payback for Watergate.

But, if indeed there is a predictable trajectory to our national Greek
tragedy, the payback for Clinton will be an even bigger *****.

Let the impeachment begin.

______________________________________________________

Harry

.

User: "dl"

Title: Re: Bush faces his own Nixon moment 09 Jun 2005 08:09:09 PM
The below listing may very well be true, but its what America wanted for 8
years.
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:cd5ha15v2mg37l9es4unlg983v68cbqtcj@4ax.com...


From The Hartford Advocate, 6/9/05:
http://hartfordadvocate.com/gbase/News/content?oid=oid:114875

Deep Gloat

Bush faces his own Nixon moment

by Alan Bisbort - June 9, 2005

http://hartfordadvocate.com/binary/114875-273-1/world-4585.jpeg


To George W. Bush's increasing dismay, there are only so many Michael
Jacksons and runaway brides to go around.

As Our Fearless Leader pedals his Pee Wee Herman bike more maniacally
than usual these days, he's in desperate need of another monumentally
weird news story to distract the nation "bigtime," as ***** Cheney
would say.

His approval ratings are in the low 40s (in the 30s on Social
Security);

Iraq refuses to behave the way he fantasized it;

Congress has defied him on stem cells and lunatic-fringe judges;

John Bolton and his moustache are on ice;

prisoners have been tortured on his watch;

dead bodies are piled in mounds everywhere he looks.

Poor boy.

It's a wonder he doesn't just hide out on his ranch with his pillow
over his head blissfully ignoring reality the way he ignored classes
at Yale, his military commitment, his failed businesses, even his
baseball team.

If things get any worse, he may have to rename his ranch
NeverNeverLand and invite young boys in for sleepovers.

Barely having dipped his toe into the pond of his second term, GWB is
already a lame duck.

He'll be even lamer when the Democrats retake the Congress in 2006, at
which point there's a remote possibility that, well, let's not get
ahead of ourselves.

Which is why he doesn't need any monumentally weird news stories about
Watergate hogging headlines in his lapdog press.

George W. Bush is facing his Nixon Moment.

Indeed, the revelation of the identity of Deep Throat this past week
was a national wake-up call.

It was a reminder of just how far "investigative journalism" has
fallen in this nation, where the best of that formerly celebrated
breed are working at cartoon magazines (Sy Hersh at the New Yorker),
as an exile in England (Greg Palast), as a satirist (Jon Stewart and
The Daily Show) or wielding a camera (Michael Moore).

If a Deep Throat with close White House ties were today to funnel the
truth to the press corps, half of the reporters would soil their
britches in fright and the other half would run and rat him out to
Massuh Rove.

We got a glimpse of that dynamic when longtime White House insider --
a Republican, no less -- Richard Clarke spilled the beans on Bush's
bungling the war on terror.

Rather than address the issues of national importance Clarke raised in
his book, the media focused on Clarke's "motives."

The dynamic was the same before the war began.

Only a fool or blindly partisan hack thought attacking Iraq was
justified.

As Daily Kos notes, "The only thing surprising about the Iraq
occupation is that it has so persistently mirrored what war critics
predicted; a rapid military 'win,' followed by a Vietnam-like
insurgency that bogs down U.S. forces and destabilizes any nascent
attempts at self-government. That's not horn-tooting; anyone not fully
under the spell of yay! war could see it coming ten miles off."

Yet, the media turned it into a he said/she said proposition.

They presented, as "he said," the White House's insistence that Saddam
had WMDs and posed an immediate threat to U.S. security, as well as
the unchallenged innuendo that he had a connection to the terrorists
that carried out the 9/11 attacks.

On the "she said" side, you had Hans Blix, Scott Ritter, the United
Nations, all of our traditional sissie allies and most of the rest of
the world begging, cajoling, screaming NO.

Though one side was clearly lying -- the very definition of high
crimes and misdemeanors -- their version was always given (more than)
equal weight.

In fact, the New York Times colluded with the lying side, via Judith
Miller's criminally misleading reportage of Saddam's WMD cache, and
Bob Novak was an outright accomplice to treason by revealing the name,
at the White House's bidding, of an undercover CIA agent, compromising
national security.

Worst of all, Bob Woodward, one of the titans of Watergate, became
George W. Bush's biggest wartime cheerleader.

So much for our press.

George W. Bush needs another runaway bride, not this collective
gloating over Deep Throat.

That's because Watergate equals impeachment. We don't want to be
thinking impeachment right now.

Why?

Because no president in American history is more impeachable than
George W. Bush.

There has not been such high crimes and misdemeanors, such chicanery,
manipulation, murder and looting since, well, ever.

Nixon's crime was the cover up, not the initial act.

Bush's crimes are so numerous that any cover up, including ones
willingly aided by a national press obsessed with Michael Jackson's
sexual psychosis and hillbilly brides, will ultimately fail.

It has been said that the six-year witch hunt of Bill Clinton was
payback for Watergate.

But, if indeed there is a predictable trajectory to our national Greek
tragedy, the payback for Clinton will be an even bigger *****.

Let the impeachment begin.

______________________________________________________

Harry

.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER