| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
19 Dec 2004 11:46:57 PM |
| Object: |
Bush named Time's 2004 Person of Year |
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-12/19/content_2355999.htm
They couldn't have made a more deserving choice. I will need to renew
my subscription when it expires in April.
.
|
|
| User: "Robin" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush named Time's 2004 Person of Year |
29 Dec 2004 09:20:39 AM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1103521617.539148.248440@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-12/19/content_2355999.htm
They couldn't have made a more deserving choice. I will
need to renew
my subscription when it expires in April.
And Osama Bin Laden was man of the year in 2001.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush named Time's 2004 Person of Year |
29 Dec 2004 09:40:15 AM |
|
|
Robin <robinandtami@nospam.com> wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1103521617.539148.248440@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-12/19/content_2355999.htm
They couldn't have made a more deserving choice. I will need to renew
my subscription when it expires in April.
And Osama Bin Laden was man of the year in 2001.
I looked up a list of the "Man of the Year" awards. There doesn't seem to
be much rhyme or reason behind the appointments. You've got Adolf Hitler in
1938, Joseph Stalin in 1939 AND 1942, Ayatullah Khomeini in 1979. (Must have
been before they took the U.S. hostages that same year) BTW Rudolph
Giuliani was Man of the Year in 2001. Given his situation and reaction to
9/11, I would say deservedly so. There are some others that you can look
at and say that they deserved the award, but many of the rest of them you
sort of scratch your head and wonder if the appointment wasn't simply
politically motivated.
--
"Only Buddhism is compatible with science. It covers the smallest
particles to the largest creations of the cosmos. It is the only
religion capable of scientific truth."
Albert Einstein
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush named Time's 2004 Person of Year |
29 Dec 2004 09:26:12 AM |
|
|
Robin <robinandtami@nospam.com> wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1103521617.539148.248440@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-12/19/content_2355999.htm
They couldn't have made a more deserving choice. I will need to renew
my subscription when it expires in April.
And Osama Bin Laden was man of the year in 2001.
Wasn't Adolf Hitler Time's "Man of the Year" in 1934 or sometime close to
that? It seems that history does repeat itself.
--
"Only Buddhism is compatible with science. It covers the smallest
particles to the largest creations of the cosmos. It is the only
religion capable of scientific truth."
Albert Einstein
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "J Young" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush named Time's 2004 Person of Year |
29 Dec 2004 11:38:56 AM |
|
|
Robin wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1103521617.539148.248440@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-12/19/content_2355999.htm
They couldn't have made a more deserving choice. I will
need to renew
my subscription when it expires in April.
And Osama Bin Laden was man of the year in 2001.
Rudolph Guilliani was Time magazine's 2001 "Person of the Year".
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robin" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush named Time's 2004 Person of Year |
29 Dec 2004 01:22:23 PM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1104341936.145826.4200@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Robin wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1103521617.539148.248440@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-12/19/content_2355999.htm
They couldn't have made a more deserving choice. I
will
need to renew
my subscription when it expires in April.
And Osama Bin Laden was man of the year in 2001.
Rudolph Guilliani was Time magazine's 2001 "Person of the
Year".
You are absolutely right. He was first runner up.
"Though we spent hours debating the pros and cons of naming
Osama bin Laden, it ultimately became easy to dismiss him,"
said managing editor Jim Kelly. "He is not a
larger-than-life figure with broad historical sweep ... he
is smaller than life, a garden-variety terrorist whose evil
plan succeeded beyond his highest hopes."
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "The other Donald" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush named Time's 2004 Person of Year |
20 Dec 2004 12:18:00 PM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1103521617.539148.248440@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-12/19/content_2355999.htm
They couldn't have made a more deserving choice. I will need to renew
my subscription when it expires in April.
How appropriate, considering that Time chose Hitler in 1938:
http://www.scrapbookpages.com/DachauMemorial/TimeCover.html
.....Stalin in '39 and '42:
http://www.plp.org/misc/timemagstalin.html
.....the Ayatollah Khomeni in '79:
http://www.whywehatebush.com/news/04_12_bushYear.htm
.....Communist Nikita Khrushchev in '57, Nixon "I am not a crook" in '71 and
'72, Reagan in '80 and '83; a couple of your personal favorites: Clinton in
'92 and '98 and Jimmy Carter in '76, even though you were still drooling and
shitting your diaper in the 90's and really don't know a damn thing about
the era.
In fact, here's the entire list, so feel free to read it any way you'd like:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_of_the_Year
(Notice the explanation of how this is chosen, and that Osama was actually
in the running in '01, except that it was overridden, not due to votes, but
due to pandering.)
Further explained here:
http://www.usatoday.com/money/media/2001-12-21-time.htm
All it means, Jon, is that you fantasize about performing fellatio on Shrub,
plus anyone that blows sunshine up his ***** *today, completely forgetting to
actually *THINK* about the ***** that falls out of your mouth.
"Rah-rah-rah, I love Time magazine." -from: Jon "IBenGetiner" Young, the
lying, raging ***** of UseNET.
Odds are, Jon, that you don't actually have a subscription in the first
place, let alone any discussion of your patent illiteracy.
--
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
Apatriot #22
Atheist FF/EMT
.....and ordained minister
Stork pin recipient: May 1, 2003 -Madelyn
.
|
|
|
| User: "Matty" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush named Time's 2004 Person of Year |
21 Dec 2004 12:04:48 AM |
|
|
On 2004-12-21 07:18:00 +1300, "The other Donald"
<the_donald_13@yeehaw2.com> said:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1103521617.539148.248440@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-12/19/content_2355999.htm
They couldn't have made a more deserving choice. I will need to renew
my subscription when it expires in April.
How appropriate, considering that Time chose Hitler in 1938:
http://www.scrapbookpages.com/DachauMemorial/TimeCover.html
....Stalin in '39 and '42:
http://www.plp.org/misc/timemagstalin.html
....the Ayatollah Khomeni in '79:
http://www.whywehatebush.com/news/04_12_bushYear.htm
....Communist Nikita Khrushchev in '57, Nixon "I am not a crook" in '71 and
'72, Reagan in '80 and '83; a couple of your personal favorites: Clinton in
'92 and '98 and Jimmy Carter in '76, even though you were still drooling and
shitting your diaper in the 90's and really don't know a damn thing about
the era.
In fact, here's the entire list, so feel free to read it any way you'd like:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_of_the_Year
(Notice the explanation of how this is chosen, and that Osama was actually
in the running in '01, except that it was overridden, not due to votes, but
due to pandering.)
Further explained here:
http://www.usatoday.com/money/media/2001-12-21-time.htm
All it means, Jon, is that you fantasize about performing fellatio on Shrub,
plus anyone that blows sunshine up his ***** *today, completely forgetting to
actually *THINK* about the ***** that falls out of your mouth.
"Rah-rah-rah, I love Time magazine." -from: Jon "IBenGetiner" Young, the
lying, raging ***** of UseNET.
Odds are, Jon, that you don't actually have a subscription in the first
place, let alone any discussion of your patent illiteracy.
I think the bigger problem is the fact that J Young doesn't even know
what conditions Times "Man of the Year" is chosen on.
With that being said, I wouldn't be court reading that third rate
tabloid, even if you paid me.
Matty
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Don W. McCollough" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush named Time's 2004 Person of Year |
21 Dec 2004 02:42:57 AM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1103521617.539148.248440@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-12/19/content_2355999.htm
They couldn't have made a more deserving choice. I will need to renew
my subscription when it expires in April.
Is it just me, or is Time magazine getting *thinner* by the year?
I had my hands on a copy and it seemed pretty thin.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Grantland" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush named Time's 2004 Person of Year |
21 Dec 2004 02:46:45 AM |
|
|
"Don W. McCollough" <letters@softhome.net> wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1103521617.539148.248440@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-12/19/content_2355999.htm
They couldn't have made a more deserving choice. I will need to renew
my subscription when it expires in April.
Is it just me, or is Time magazine getting *thinner* by the year?
I had my hands on a copy and it seemed pretty thin.
yiddish vampires. I cancelled long ago.
Grantland
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush named Time's 2004 Person of Year |
21 Dec 2004 04:13:56 AM |
|
|
Don W. McCollough <letters@softhome.net> wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1103521617.539148.248440@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-12/19/content_2355999.htm
They couldn't have made a more deserving choice. I will need to renew
my subscription when it expires in April.
Is it just me, or is Time magazine getting *thinner* by the year?
I had my hands on a copy and it seemed pretty thin.
Maybe your hands are thicker? :c)
--
"Only Buddhism is compatible with science. It covers the smallest
particles to the largest creations of the cosmos. It is the only
religion capable of scientific truth."
Albert Einstein
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "J Young" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush named Time's 2004 Person of Year |
21 Dec 2004 08:46:37 AM |
|
|
Don W. McCollough wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1103521617.539148.248440@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-12/19/content_2355999.htm
They couldn't have made a more deserving choice. I will need to
renew
my subscription when it expires in April.
Is it just me, or is Time magazine getting *thinner* by the year?
I had my hands on a copy and it seemed pretty thin.
Half the inside is now cardboard advertising. Rip it out and you have a
much thinner magazine than years ago. Of course, the price has about
doubled.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Elmo" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush named Time's 2004 Person of Year |
20 Dec 2004 01:07:36 PM |
|
|
In article <1103521617.539148.248440@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>, J
Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-12/19/content_2355999.htm
They couldn't have made a more deserving choice. I will need to renew
my subscription when it expires in April.
History repeating itself. Hitler took it in 1938. Pretty much the
same timing as Bush, today.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush named Time's 2004 Person of Year |
21 Dec 2004 01:29:01 AM |
|
|
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-12/19/content_2355999.htm
They couldn't have made a more deserving choice.
In 1938 Time's man of the year was Adolf Hitler.
In 1939 and in 1942 Time's man of the year was Josef Stalin.
In 1979 Time's man of the year was the Ayatolla Khomeini
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "BOB" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush named Time's 2004 Person of Year |
21 Dec 2004 05:07:16 PM |
|
|
(Ray Fischer) wrote in news:cq8jbs$jor$1
@bolt.sonic.net:
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-12/19/content_2355999.htm
They couldn't have made a more deserving choice.
In 1938 Time's man of the year was Adolf Hitler.
In 1939 and in 1942 Time's man of the year was Josef Stalin.
In 1979 Time's man of the year was the Ayatolla Khomeini
And in 2000 and 2004, Ayatolla Bush. Works for me.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: Bush named Time's 2004 Person of Year |
21 Dec 2004 01:45:16 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 07:29:01 GMT, (Ray
Fischer) wrote, akin to the neighing and braying of farmyard animals:
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-12/19/content_2355999.htm
They couldn't have made a more deserving choice.
In 1938 Time's man of the year was Adolf Hitler.
In 1939 and in 1942 Time's man of the year was Josef Stalin.
In 1979 Time's man of the year was the Ayatolla Khomeini
And, even worse to those like Young...Clinton was named PoTY as well.
Horrors! I guess it's an honour when a Bush gets it, but not when
Clinton does...
---
"As democracy is perfected, the office of president
represents, more and more closely, the inner soul
of the people. On some great and glorious day the
plain folks of the land will reach their heart's
desire at last and the White House will be
adorned by a downright moron."
H. L. Mencken
.
|
|
|
| User: "Matty" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush named Time's 2004 Person of Year |
21 Dec 2004 04:05:10 AM |
|
|
On 2004-12-21 20:45:16 +1300, Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> said:
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 07:29:01 GMT, (Ray
Fischer) wrote, akin to the neighing and braying of farmyard animals:
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-12/19/content_2355999.htm
They couldn't have made a more deserving choice.
In 1938 Time's man of the year was Adolf Hitler.
In 1939 and in 1942 Time's man of the year was Josef Stalin.
In 1979 Time's man of the year was the Ayatolla Khomeini
And, even worse to those like Young...Clinton was named PoTY as well.
Horrors! I guess it's an honour when a Bush gets it, but not when
Clinton does...
According to the Republicans, until GWB arrived, the world was under
the evil influence of the "liberal media", but through a bit of devine
intervention, some how all those "liberal media outlets" are now
"unbiased".
Matty
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "L. Michael Roberts" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush named Time's 2004 Person of Year |
21 Dec 2004 10:59:10 AM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-12/19/content_2355999.htm
They couldn't have made a more deserving choice.
In 1938 Time's man of the year was Adolf Hitler.
In 1939 and in 1942 Time's man of the year was Josef Stalin.
In 1979 Time's man of the year was the Ayatolla Khomeini
It appears that Dubia is in good company!
--
+==================== L. Michael Roberts ======================+
This represents my personal opinion and NOT Company policy
Goderich, Ont, Canada. To reply, post a request for my valid E-mail
"Life is a sexually transmitted, terminal, condition"
+================================================================+
.
|
|
|
| User: "J Young" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush named Time's 2004 Person of Year |
21 Dec 2004 11:36:16 AM |
|
|
L. Michael Roberts wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-12/19/content_2355999.htm
They couldn't have made a more deserving choice.
In 1938 Time's man of the year was Adolf Hitler.
In 1939 and in 1942 Time's man of the year was Josef Stalin.
In 1979 Time's man of the year was the Ayatolla Khomeini
It appears that Dubia is in good company!
--
+==================== L. Michael Roberts ======================+
Maybe just the Ayatolla; lot's of rhetoric and a few thousand
casualties. Adolf and Joe went well into the millions. Bad comparison.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush named Time's 2004 Person of Year |
21 Dec 2004 12:06:39 PM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
Today's liberals have far more in common with Hitler and Stalin than
any conservative I ever met. Don't forget, they also chose your
favorite Georgia Cracka, Jimminee Carter, the 20% man - 20% inflation
and 20% interest rates, that is! What a guy! The day Reagan took office
the Iranians ***** their pants and released those American hostages.
Quelle surprise!
Spartakus said, "Merry Christmas" is the new "***** you". Merry
Christmas, Ray!
Cleopatra
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush named Time's 2004 Person of Year |
21 Dec 2004 09:00:59 PM |
|
|
<Merry_Christmas@linkedto.no-spam-allowed.com> wrote:
Today's liberals have far more in common with Hitler and Stalin than
any conservative I ever met.
Except that Hitler and the fascists were intolerant of any form of
liberalism.
Just like you.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "J Young" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush named Time's 2004 Person of Year |
22 Dec 2004 12:14:51 AM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
<Merry_Christmas@linkedto.no-spam-allowed.com> wrote:
Today's liberals have far more in common with Hitler and Stalin than
any conservative I ever met.
Except that Hitler and the fascists were intolerant of any form of
liberalism.
Just like you.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
Surely you're not comparing the liberal of today with the liberal of
days yore. The only social issue left is gay marriage, a total farce.
.
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush named Time's 2004 Person of Year |
22 Dec 2004 01:01:15 AM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> writes:
Ray Fischer wrote:
<snip>
Surely you're not comparing the liberal of today with the liberal of
days yore. The only social issue left is gay marriage, a total farce.
Really? Health care is no longer a social issue? When did we solve
that problem? How about King George's war? Last I heard, the
situation was if anything getting worse for all concerned. Did you
read about how Bush's minions have been torturing people in his
concentration camp in Cuba? That was in today's newspapers, coming to
light due to the ACLU filing a Freedom of Information Act request.
What's being done about it?
Do you *really* want lighted cigarettes stuck in some poor guy's ears?
Is that how any of us want our government to behave? If it was up to
me, whoever was responsible would be tried for crimes against
humanity. The head of the FBI knew - he received a memo about it from
an FBI agent concerned that the military was trying to set the FBI up
as the fall guy. Do you think he wouldn't cover his ***** and tell
George? If George knew and allowed it to continue, doesn't that make
him an acomplice after the fact? After all, it was military personnel
doing it, and George is supposedly the commander and chief. Given how
the Republicans had demanded Clinton's head over Monica's blue
dress, shouldn't they be drawing up articles of impeachment to rid us
of George Bush for doing nothing about the sort of treatment you'd
expect from the Gestapo?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: Bush named Time's 2004 Person of Year |
21 Dec 2004 12:32:27 PM |
|
|
On 21 Dec 2004 10:06:39 -0800,
Merry_Christmas@linkedto.no-spam-allowed.com wrote, akin to the
neighing and braying of farmyard animals:
x-no-archive: yes
Today's liberals have far more in common with Hitler and Stalin than
any conservative I ever met. Don't forget, they also chose your
favorite Georgia Cracka, Jimminee Carter, the 20% man - 20% inflation
and 20% interest rates, that is! What a guy! The day Reagan took office
the Iranians ***** their pants and released those American hostages.
Actually, what you mean is that they released the hostages as Reagan
had asked them to, after keeping them through his campaign as he had
also asked them to. Nothing like using American hostages as a campaign
prop, is there?
Quelle surprise!
Spartakus said, "Merry Christmas" is the new "***** you". Merry
Christmas, Ray!
Cleopatra
---
"As democracy is perfected, the office of president
represents, more and more closely, the inner soul
of the people. On some great and glorious day the
plain folks of the land will reach their heart's
desire at last and the White House will be
adorned by a downright moron."
H. L. Mencken
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,493 days to BYE-BYE Bushie! Forever!!" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush named Time's 2004 Person of Year |
20 Dec 2004 12:12:11 AM |
|
|
On 19 Dec 2004 21:46:57 -0800,
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
They couldn't have made a more deserving choice. I will
need to renew my subscription when it expires in April.
Go for it! After all, "TIME" freely volunteers that they go for
the person they perceive to have been the most *influencial*...
no matter HOW idiotic and evil he/she may be.
Bush was a good choice. MOST bloodthirsty and doltish,
yet influencial, person that they've chosen in years!
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
(E-Mail address is valid when removing _ from it.)
.
|
|
|
| User: "J Young" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush named Time's 2004 Person of Year |
20 Dec 2004 11:54:16 AM |
|
|
Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,493 days to BYE-BYE Bushie!
Forever!! wrote:
On 19 Dec 2004 21:46:57 -0800,
Go for it! After all, "TIME" freely volunteers that they go for
the person they perceive to have been the most *influencial*...
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
And surely no one was more influencial than George W. Just his name
alone causes all you dolts of the LLL to fly into a tantrum. That's
influence.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,493 days to BYE-BYE Bushie! Forever!!" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush named Time's 2004 Person of Year |
20 Dec 2004 01:51:58 PM |
|
|
On 20 Dec 2004 09:54:16 -0800,
"Jon Young"/"IBen Getiner" spewed:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"TIME" freely volunteers that they go for the person they
perceive to have been the most *influencial*, no matter
HOW idiotic and evil he/she may be.
Bush was a good choice. MOST bloodthirsty and doltish,
yet influencial, person that they've chosen in years!
And surely no one was more influencial than George W.
Just his name alone causes all you ... to fly into a tantrum.
That's influence.
Actually no ensible egalitarian that I've ever met
has the slightest problem with George Washington.
And if you're referring to George W. Bush... yeah.
He has influence. So did Adolf Hitler.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
(E-Mail address is valid when removing _ from it.)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Paulo Gomes Jardim" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush named Time's 2004 Person of Year |
29 Dec 2004 11:30:54 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 06:12:11 GMT, Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09:
1,493 days to BYE-BYE Bushie! Forever!! <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
Bush was a good choice. MOST bloodthirsty and doltish,
yet influencial, person that they've chosen in years!
Since Hitler, perhaps? ;)
--
" Pallida mors aequo pulsat pede pauperum tabernas regumque turres." --
Horacio
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,485 days to BYE-BYE Bushie! Forever!!" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush named Time's 2004 Person of Year |
30 Dec 2004 08:26:07 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 05:30:54 -0000,
Paulo Gomes Jardim <darwin+usenet@spamcop.net> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
Bush was a good choice. MOST bloodthirsty and doltish,
yet influencial, person that they've chosen in years!
Since Hitler, perhaps? ;)
Good parallel. In a surprising number of ways!
--
" Pallida mors aequo pulsat pede pauperum tabernas regumque turres." --
Horacio
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
