Politics > Politics-USA > Bush: Saddam was not responsible for 9/11. 2,671 American troops are dead.
| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Harry Hope" |
| Date: |
12 Sep 2006 06:13:38 AM |
| Object: |
Bush: Saddam was not responsible for 9/11. 2,671 American troops are dead. |
http://www.mg.co.za/articlePage.aspx?articleid=283845&area=/breaking_news/breaking_news__international_news
US: Saddam was not responsible for 9/11
12 September 2006
United States President George Bush on Monday night admitted that
Saddam Hussein had no hand in the 9/11 terror attacks, but he asked
Americans to support a war in Iraq that he said was the defining
struggle of our age.
______________________________________________________________
2,671 American troops are dead, 19,945 have been wounded, tens of
thousands of innocent Iraqis are dead and wounded
Harry
.
|
|
| User: "Daniel" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush: Saddam was not responsible for 9/11. 2,671 American troops are dead. |
12 Sep 2006 06:38:23 AM |
|
|
Harry Hope wrote:
http://www.mg.co.za/articlePage.aspx?articleid=283845&area=/breaking_news/breaking_news__international_news
US: Saddam was not responsible for 9/11
No *****? No one has said he was, except you nutjobs. Nice to see you
fianlly woke the ***** up.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chuck Feney" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush: Saddam was not responsible for 9/11. 2,671 American troops are dead. |
12 Sep 2006 07:57:15 AM |
|
|
"Daniel" <sabot120mm@hotmail.com> wrote:
Harry Hope wrote:
http://www.mg.co.za/articlePage.aspx?articleid=283845&area=/breaking_news/breaking_news__international_news
US: Saddam was not responsible for 9/11
No *****? No one has said he was, except you nutjobs. Nice to see you
fianlly woke the ***** up.
From polls:
9-6-2003: 70% believed Saddam was personally involved.
Today, 43% still believe it.
1. Who do you suppose sold that link to the American people? It
wasn't President Gore.
2. When those remaining 43% "wake the ***** up," what will happen to
your neocon administration?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush: Saddam was not responsible for 9/11. 2,671 American troops are dead. |
12 Sep 2006 07:55:44 AM |
|
|
Daniel wrote:
Harry Hope wrote:
http://www.mg.co.za/articlePage.aspx?articleid=283845&area=/breaking_news/breaking_news__international_news
US: Saddam was not responsible for 9/11
No *****? No one has said he was, except you nutjobs. Nice to see you
fianlly woke the ***** up.
Um, only if "nobody" includes the Vice-president of the United
States
of America and the Secretary of State. But yeah, I agree, they're
both a couple of nut jobs.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Daniel" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush: Saddam was not responsible for 9/11. 2,671 American troops are dead. |
12 Sep 2006 08:54:57 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Harry Hope wrote:
http://www.mg.co.za/articlePage.aspx?articleid=283845&area=/breaking_news/breaking_news__international_news
US: Saddam was not responsible for 9/11
No *****? No one has said he was, except you nutjobs. Nice to see you
fianlly woke the ***** up.
Um, only if "nobody" includes the Vice-president of the United
States
of America and the Secretary of State. But yeah, I agree, they're
both a couple of nut jobs.
They said it because YOU say they did? Give me a fucking break.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush: Saddam was not responsible for 9/11. 2,671 American troops are dead. |
13 Sep 2006 07:27:45 AM |
|
|
Daniel wrote:
oconnell@slr.orl.lmco.com wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Harry Hope wrote:
http://www.mg.co.za/articlePage.aspx?articleid=283845&area=/breaking_news/breaking_news__international_news
US: Saddam was not responsible for 9/11
No *****? No one has said he was, except you nutjobs. Nice to see you
fianlly woke the ***** up.
Um, only if "nobody" includes the Vice-president of the United
States
of America and the Secretary of State. But yeah, I agree, they're
both a couple of nut jobs.
They said it because YOU say they did? Give me a fucking break.
No, I didn't tell them to say it. They thought it up all on their
own.
From I'm sure you're favorite information source:
http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2006Sep12/0,4670,Rice,00.html
She maintained"there were ties between Iraq and al-Qaida.
Are we learning more now that we have access to people like Saddam
Hussein's intelligence services? Of course we're going to learn more."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Daniel" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush: Saddam was not responsible for 9/11. 2,671 American troops are dead. |
13 Sep 2006 11:20:24 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Daniel wrote:
wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Harry Hope wrote:
http://www.mg.co.za/articlePage.aspx?articleid=283845&area=/breaking_news/breaking_news__international_news
US: Saddam was not responsible for 9/11
No *****? No one has said he was, except you nutjobs. Nice to see you
fianlly woke the ***** up.
Um, only if "nobody" includes the Vice-president of the United
States
of America and the Secretary of State. But yeah, I agree, they're
both a couple of nut jobs.
They said it because YOU say they did? Give me a fucking break.
No, I didn't tell them to say it. They thought it up all on their
own.
From I'm sure you're favorite information source:
http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2006Sep12/0,4670,Rice,00.html
She maintained"there were ties between Iraq and al-Qaida.
Are we learning more now that we have access to people like Saddam
Hussein's intelligence services? Of course we're going to learn more."
And I'm sure we will learn more. After all, there WAS an Al-Queda camp
in Iraq.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush: Saddam was not responsible for 9/11. 2,671 American troops aredead. |
18 Sep 2006 12:20:28 PM |
|
|
Daniel wrote:
oconnell@slr.orl.lmco.com wrote:
Daniel wrote:
oconnell@slr.orl.lmco.com wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Harry Hope wrote:
http://www.mg.co.za/articlePage.aspx?articleid=283845&area=/breaking_news/breaking_news__international_news
US: Saddam was not responsible for 9/11
No *****? No one has said he was, except you nutjobs. Nice to see you
fianlly woke the ***** up.
Um, only if "nobody" includes the Vice-president of the United
States
of America and the Secretary of State. But yeah, I agree, they're
both a couple of nut jobs.
They said it because YOU say they did? Give me a fucking break.
No, I didn't tell them to say it. They thought it up all on their
own.
From I'm sure you're favorite information source:
http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2006Sep12/0,4670,Rice,00.html
She maintained"there were ties between Iraq and al-Qaida.
Are we learning more now that we have access to people like Saddam
Hussein's intelligence services? Of course we're going to learn more."
And I'm sure we will learn more. After all, there WAS an Al-Queda camp
in Iraq.
In the Kurdish controlled part of Iraq...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Daniel" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush: Saddam was not responsible for 9/11. 2,671 American troops are dead. |
18 Sep 2006 11:17:15 PM |
|
|
Rich Travsky wrote:
Daniel wrote:
oconnell@slr.orl.lmco.com wrote:
Daniel wrote:
oconnell@slr.orl.lmco.com wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Harry Hope wrote:
http://www.mg.co.za/articlePage.aspx?articleid=283845&area=/breaking_news/breaking_news__international_news
US: Saddam was not responsible for 9/11
No *****? No one has said he was, except you nutjobs. Nice to see you
fianlly woke the ***** up.
Um, only if "nobody" includes the Vice-president of the United
States
of America and the Secretary of State. But yeah, I agree, they're
both a couple of nut jobs.
They said it because YOU say they did? Give me a fucking break.
No, I didn't tell them to say it. They thought it up all on their
own.
From I'm sure you're favorite information source:
http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2006Sep12/0,4670,Rice,00.html
She maintained"there were ties between Iraq and al-Qaida.
Are we learning more now that we have access to people like Saddam
Hussein's intelligence services? Of course we're going to learn more."
And I'm sure we will learn more. After all, there WAS an Al-Queda camp
in Iraq.
In the Kurdish controlled part of Iraq...
You really are stupid, aren't you?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush: Saddam was not responsible for 9/11. 2,671 American troops aredead. |
19 Sep 2006 11:36:14 PM |
|
|
Daniel wrote:
Rich Travsky wrote:
Daniel wrote:
oconnell@slr.orl.lmco.com wrote:
Daniel wrote:
oconnell@slr.orl.lmco.com wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Harry Hope wrote:
http://www.mg.co.za/articlePage.aspx?articleid=283845&area=/breaking_news/breaking_news__international_news
US: Saddam was not responsible for 9/11
No *****? No one has said he was, except you nutjobs. Nice to see you
fianlly woke the ***** up.
Um, only if "nobody" includes the Vice-president of the United
States
of America and the Secretary of State. But yeah, I agree, they're
both a couple of nut jobs.
They said it because YOU say they did? Give me a fucking break.
No, I didn't tell them to say it. They thought it up all on their
own.
From I'm sure you're favorite information source:
http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2006Sep12/0,4670,Rice,00.html
She maintained"there were ties between Iraq and al-Qaida.
Are we learning more now that we have access to people like Saddam
Hussein's intelligence services? Of course we're going to learn more."
And I'm sure we will learn more. After all, there WAS an Al-Queda camp
in Iraq.
In the Kurdish controlled part of Iraq...
You really are stupid, aren't you?
You're really ignorant, aren't you? Didn't know about the Kurdish zone? ;)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Daniel" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush: Saddam was not responsible for 9/11. 2,671 American troops are dead. |
20 Sep 2006 06:56:27 PM |
|
|
Rich Travsky wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Rich Travsky wrote:
Daniel wrote:
oconnell@slr.orl.lmco.com wrote:
Daniel wrote:
oconnell@slr.orl.lmco.com wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Harry Hope wrote:
http://www.mg.co.za/articlePage.aspx?articleid=283845&area=/breaking_news/breaking_news__international_news
US: Saddam was not responsible for 9/11
No *****? No one has said he was, except you nutjobs. Nice to see you
fianlly woke the ***** up.
Um, only if "nobody" includes the Vice-president of the United
States
of America and the Secretary of State. But yeah, I agree, they're
both a couple of nut jobs.
They said it because YOU say they did? Give me a fucking break.
No, I didn't tell them to say it. They thought it up all on their
own.
From I'm sure you're favorite information source:
http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2006Sep12/0,4670,Rice,00.html
She maintained"there were ties between Iraq and al-Qaida.
Are we learning more now that we have access to people like Saddam
Hussein's intelligence services? Of course we're going to learn more."
And I'm sure we will learn more. After all, there WAS an Al-Queda camp
in Iraq.
In the Kurdish controlled part of Iraq...
You really are stupid, aren't you?
You're really ignorant, aren't you? Didn't know about the Kurdish zone? ;)
So you want to believe that Saddam had NO IDEA what was going on in his
own country? And you call me ignorant.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Daniel" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush: Saddam was not responsible for 9/11. 2,671 American troops are dead. |
25 Sep 2006 07:22:38 AM |
|
|
Rich Travsky wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Rich Travsky wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Rich Travsky wrote:
Daniel wrote:
oconnell@slr.orl.lmco.com wrote:
Daniel wrote:
oconnell@slr.orl.lmco.com wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Harry Hope wrote:
http://www.mg.co.za/articlePage.aspx?articleid=283845&area=/breaking_news/breaking_news__international_news
US: Saddam was not responsible for 9/11
No *****? No one has said he was, except you nutjobs. Nice to see you
fianlly woke the ***** up.
Um, only if "nobody" includes the Vice-president of the United
States
of America and the Secretary of State. But yeah, I agree, they're
both a couple of nut jobs.
They said it because YOU say they did? Give me a fucking break.
No, I didn't tell them to say it. They thought it up all on their
own.
From I'm sure you're favorite information source:
http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2006Sep12/0,4670,Rice,00.html
She maintained"there were ties between Iraq and al-Qaida.
Are we learning more now that we have access to people like Saddam
Hussein's intelligence services? Of course we're going to learn more."
And I'm sure we will learn more. After all, there WAS an Al-Queda camp
in Iraq.
In the Kurdish controlled part of Iraq...
You really are stupid, aren't you?
You're really ignorant, aren't you? Didn't know about the Kurdish zone? ;)
So you want to believe that Saddam had NO IDEA what was going on in his
own country? And you call me ignorant.
Yes, you are ignorant. It wasn't a question of knowing what was going on, it was
a question of what he could do about it. Which was zip.
RT
You mean to tell me that Saddam ran his ENTIRE country with an iron
fist, except for the Al-Queda camp? And you call me ignorant.......
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush: Saddam was not responsible for 9/11. 2,671 American troops aredead. |
28 Sep 2006 03:31:07 PM |
|
|
Daniel wrote:
Rich Travsky wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Rich Travsky wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Rich Travsky wrote:
Daniel wrote:
oconnell@slr.orl.lmco.com wrote:
Daniel wrote:
oconnell@slr.orl.lmco.com wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Harry Hope wrote:
http://www.mg.co.za/articlePage.aspx?articleid=283845&area=/breaking_news/breaking_news__international_news
US: Saddam was not responsible for 9/11
No *****? No one has said he was, except you nutjobs. Nice to see you
fianlly woke the ***** up.
Um, only if "nobody" includes the Vice-president of the United
States
of America and the Secretary of State. But yeah, I agree, they're
both a couple of nut jobs.
They said it because YOU say they did? Give me a fucking break.
No, I didn't tell them to say it. They thought it up all on their
own.
From I'm sure you're favorite information source:
http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2006Sep12/0,4670,Rice,00.html
She maintained"there were ties between Iraq and al-Qaida.
Are we learning more now that we have access to people like Saddam
Hussein's intelligence services? Of course we're going to learn more."
And I'm sure we will learn more. After all, there WAS an Al-Queda camp
in Iraq.
In the Kurdish controlled part of Iraq...
You really are stupid, aren't you?
You're really ignorant, aren't you? Didn't know about the Kurdish zone? ;)
So you want to believe that Saddam had NO IDEA what was going on in his
own country? And you call me ignorant.
Yes, you are ignorant. It wasn't a question of knowing what was going on, it was
a question of what he could do about it. Which was zip.
RT
You mean to tell me that Saddam ran his ENTIRE country with an iron
fist, except for the Al-Queda camp? And you call me ignorant.......
Ignorant, stupid, clueless - the list goes on....
http://canberra.usembassy.gov/hyper/2002/0617/epf110.htm
*EPF110 06/17/2002
Panelists Discuss Kurdish Role in Post-Saddam Iraq
...
Unlike their compatriots in the rest of Iraq, the Kurds have enjoyed what
National War College Professor Peter Galbraith described as "de facto
independence" from Baghdad since the end of the 1991 Gulf War, as a result
of their successful rebellion against Saddam Hussein and the enforcement of
the northern "no fly zone" by U.S. and British forces.
...
You were saying????
RT
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush: Saddam was not responsible for 9/11. 2,671 American troops are dead. |
14 Sep 2006 07:23:26 AM |
|
|
Daniel wrote:
oconnell@slr.orl.lmco.com wrote:
Daniel wrote:
oconnell@slr.orl.lmco.com wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Harry Hope wrote:
http://www.mg.co.za/articlePage.aspx?articleid=283845&area=/breaking_news/breaking_news__international_news
US: Saddam was not responsible for 9/11
No *****? No one has said he was, except you nutjobs. Nice to see you
fianlly woke the ***** up.
Um, only if "nobody" includes the Vice-president of the United
States
of America and the Secretary of State. But yeah, I agree, they're
both a couple of nut jobs.
They said it because YOU say they did? Give me a fucking break.
No, I didn't tell them to say it. They thought it up all on their
own.
From I'm sure you're favorite information source:
http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2006Sep12/0,4670,Rice,00.html
She maintained"there were ties between Iraq and al-Qaida.
Are we learning more now that we have access to people like Saddam
Hussein's intelligence services? Of course we're going to learn more."
So which is it? Are the folks that think so "nutjobs" or
were there ties? You're not keeping your lies straight.
And I'm sure we will learn more. After all, there WAS an Al-Queda camp
in Iraq.
In Kurdish controlled, US protected Iraq. Hey, maybe WE did it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Daniel" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush: Saddam was not responsible for 9/11. 2,671 American troops are dead. |
14 Sep 2006 09:31:12 AM |
|
|
wrote:
And I'm sure we will learn more. After all, there WAS an Al-Queda camp
in Iraq.
In Kurdish controlled, US protected Iraq. Hey, maybe WE did it.
Was it or was it not in Iraq?
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush: Saddam was not responsible for 9/11. 2,671 American troops are dead. |
14 Sep 2006 10:10:15 AM |
|
|
Daniel wrote:
oconnell@slr.orl.lmco.com wrote:
And I'm sure we will learn more. After all, there WAS an Al-Queda camp
in Iraq.
In Kurdish controlled, US protected Iraq. Hey, maybe WE did it.
Was it or was it not in Iraq?
It was. And that in no way demonstrates any connection between
Al Queda and Sadam since it was in a portion of the country
which was not under his control.
They were also in Pakistan. Ossama is almost assuredly there
now.
You're desperately trying to get away from your assertion that
only nutjobs believed that there was a connection between Sadam
and 9/11 and now you seem to be trying to justify that connection.
Make up yer friggin' mind.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
