| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Cold Eyes" |
| Date: |
16 Jul 2003 02:22:40 PM |
| Object: |
Bush seems impaired; probably drinking again |
What could cause President Bush to so totally lose his grip on reality that
he spouts obvious falsehoods about Saddam not allowing UN inspectors in as
the reason for the war? Seems that he's probably drinking again, heavily by
the looks of it. The public burping and belching is one sign of this.
Dropping unconscious after choking on a pretzel is another. But the sure
signs of his drinking are his slurred speech, memory loss and inability to
hold a coherent conversation. This man needs help. God help us all.
.
|
|
| User: "Gene" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush seems impaired; probably drinking again |
16 Jul 2003 07:58:36 PM |
|
|
"Cold Eyes" <sassy@talkback.com> wrote in
news:bf48m2$dbp$0@pita.alt.net:
What could cause President Bush to so totally lose his grip on reality
that he spouts obvious falsehoods about Saddam not allowing UN
inspectors in as the reason for the war? Seems that he's probably
drinking again, heavily by the looks of it. The public burping and
belching is one sign of this. Dropping unconscious after choking on a
pretzel is another. But the sure signs of his drinking are his slurred
speech, memory loss and inability to hold a coherent conversation.
This man needs help. God help us all.
But it could be that he really is as stupid as he seems.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Natalie" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush seems impaired; probably drinking again |
17 Jul 2003 02:28:43 PM |
|
|
Gene <Yahoo@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:<Xns93BAD6710EB52DoDahDoDah@216.168.3.44>...
"Cold Eyes" <sassy@talkback.com> wrote in
news:bf48m2$dbp$0@pita.alt.net:
What could cause President Bush to so totally lose his grip on reality
that he spouts obvious falsehoods about Saddam not allowing UN
inspectors in as the reason for the war? Seems that he's probably
drinking again, heavily by the looks of it. The public burping and
belching is one sign of this. Dropping unconscious after choking on a
pretzel is another. But the sure signs of his drinking are his slurred
speech, memory loss and inability to hold a coherent conversation.
This man needs help. God help us all.
But it could be that he really is as stupid as he seems.
I don't think its drinking..You would see more disorientation from
him. I think it has to be some kind of prescription drugs..or illegal
drugs. He definately is on something!-He is totally out of it!
seriously-I think someone who actually has some concern about the
country should force some kind of Drug Testing on the President. If
they can force Airplane pilots they need to get him to submit to a
drug test ASAP! before more people are killed for his addictions.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gogarty" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush seems impaired; probably drinking again |
16 Jul 2003 10:00:24 PM |
|
|
In article <Xns93BAD6710EB52DoDahDoDah@216.168.3.44>,
says...
But it could be that he really is as stupid as he seems.
I am beginning to think the same thing. Long time ago someone said that
the greatest thing W could do for his dad would be to get elected
president because then his dad would be only the second stupidist person
to occupy the White House.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush seems impaired; probably drinking again |
16 Jul 2003 02:30:58 PM |
|
|
"Cold Eyes" <sassy@talkback.com> wrote in message
news:bf48m2$dbp$0@pita.alt.net...
What could cause President Bush to so totally lose his grip on reality
that
he spouts obvious falsehoods about Saddam not allowing UN inspectors in as
the reason for the war?
You mean the same reasons Scott Ritter said in 1998 to Bill Clinton when he
told Bill Clinton that Saddam Hussein was NOT complying with removal of
weapons?
Seems that he's probably drinking again, heavily by
the looks of it. The public burping and belching is one sign of this.
Dropping unconscious after choking on a pretzel is another. But the sure
signs of his drinking are his slurred speech, memory loss and inability to
hold a coherent conversation. This man needs help. God help us all.
You liberals are so stupid
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lawson English" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush seems impaired; probably drinking again |
16 Jul 2003 04:39:51 PM |
|
|
"Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:BFadnQFm-rh3OoiiU-KYuQ@comcast.com...
"Cold Eyes" <sassy@talkback.com> wrote in message
news:bf48m2$dbp$0@pita.alt.net...
What could cause President Bush to so totally lose his grip on reality
that
he spouts obvious falsehoods about Saddam not allowing UN inspectors in
as
the reason for the war?
You mean the same reasons Scott Ritter said in 1998 to Bill Clinton when
he
told Bill Clinton that Saddam Hussein was NOT complying with removal of
weapons?
But, under the threat of an invasion at least, Saddam let the inspectors
back in just before Bush took us to war.
--
New definition of irony:
'Today's liberal Democrats are like the supporters of the Third Reich of the
'30's and '40's
- they absolutely trusted the government to "make things right". '
-Comment made on the internet by an ardent GW Bush supporter.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "abracadabra" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush seems impaired; probably drinking again |
16 Jul 2003 04:14:05 PM |
|
|
"Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:BFadnQFm-rh3OoiiU-KYuQ@comcast.com...
"Cold Eyes" <sassy@talkback.com> wrote in message
news:bf48m2$dbp$0@pita.alt.net...
What could cause President Bush to so totally lose his grip on reality
that
he spouts obvious falsehoods about Saddam not allowing UN inspectors in
as
the reason for the war?
You mean the same reasons Scott Ritter said in 1998 to Bill Clinton when
he
told Bill Clinton that Saddam Hussein was NOT complying with removal of
weapons?
Actually Dubya said that Saddam wouldn't let inspectors back into Iraq.
He lied, and it's about the stupidest lie a person can imagine, stupider
then the claim about the Niger uranium.
Sorry you got confused, I know that thinking and conservatism don't go hand
in hand :-)
Seems that he's probably drinking again, heavily by
the looks of it. The public burping and belching is one sign of this.
Dropping unconscious after choking on a pretzel is another. But the sure
signs of his drinking are his slurred speech, memory loss and inability
to
hold a coherent conversation. This man needs help. God help us all.
You liberals are so stupid
how original
.
|
|
|
| User: "John" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush seems impaired; probably drinking again |
17 Jul 2003 01:01:16 PM |
|
|
"Cold Eyes" <sassy@talkback.com> wrote in message
news:bf5vur$bsd$0@pita.alt.net...
"John" <nospam@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:zFpRa.7535$P36.1929010@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
Actually Saddam didn't let the inspectors back into Iraq as the terms
were
set. Saddam did not comply with the terms that the United States of
America
set and Bush has the balls to show the world that the USA is not going
to
screw around with a person like Saddam when American lives are on the
line.
You really should brush up on your thought process before you open your
mout
and show the world what an idiot you are : -)
My, aren't we the macho man, just like your bring-em-on hero Bush.
That's funny, one of your liberal friends just called bush a good mouth
peice. I think you should talk to him about that.
The unfortunate thing is that our troops are stuck in a shooting gallery
in
Iraq being maimed and killed every day becdause of the Appointed Idiot's
political blunder.
I agree that it is unfortunate that US troops are being killed. I agree
that Bush was appointed if you mean that Bush was voted in by the American
people. Get over it. Every count, before and after he took office shows
that Bush had the electoral votes. I don't agree that it was a political
blunder. It was a huge success, militarily, politically, for the US and for
the world. The unfortunate part of it is that the US had to do it with just
a few other countries where is should have had active participation of the
world.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "abracadabra" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush seems impaired; probably drinking again |
17 Jul 2003 06:11:50 AM |
|
|
"John" <nospam@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:zFpRa.7535$P36.1929010@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
"abracadabra" <abra@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bf4f70$2vq$1@slb6.atl.mindspring.net...
"Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:BFadnQFm-rh3OoiiU-KYuQ@comcast.com...
"Cold Eyes" <sassy@talkback.com> wrote in message
news:bf48m2$dbp$0@pita.alt.net...
What could cause President Bush to so totally lose his grip on
reality
that
he spouts obvious falsehoods about Saddam not allowing UN inspectors
in
as
the reason for the war?
You mean the same reasons Scott Ritter said in 1998 to Bill Clinton
when
he
told Bill Clinton that Saddam Hussein was NOT complying with removal
of
weapons?
Actually Dubya said that Saddam wouldn't let inspectors back into Iraq.
He lied, and it's about the stupidest lie a person can imagine, stupider
then the claim about the Niger uranium.
Sorry you got confused, I know that thinking and conservatism don't go
hand
in hand :-)
Actually Saddam didn't let the inspectors back into Iraq as the terms were
set.
He let them in.
Squirm all you want, Dubya lied.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush seems impaired; probably drinking again |
17 Jul 2003 12:16:03 PM |
|
|
"abracadabra" <abra@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bf609p$8ko$1@slb2.atl.mindspring.net...
"John" <nospam@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:zFpRa.7535$P36.1929010@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
"abracadabra" <abra@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bf4f70$2vq$1@slb6.atl.mindspring.net...
"Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:BFadnQFm-rh3OoiiU-KYuQ@comcast.com...
"Cold Eyes" <sassy@talkback.com> wrote in message
news:bf48m2$dbp$0@pita.alt.net...
What could cause President Bush to so totally lose his grip on
reality
that
he spouts obvious falsehoods about Saddam not allowing UN
inspectors
in
as
the reason for the war?
You mean the same reasons Scott Ritter said in 1998 to Bill Clinton
when
he
told Bill Clinton that Saddam Hussein was NOT complying with removal
of
weapons?
Actually Dubya said that Saddam wouldn't let inspectors back into
Iraq.
He lied, and it's about the stupidest lie a person can imagine,
stupider
then the claim about the Niger uranium.
Sorry you got confused, I know that thinking and conservatism don't go
hand
in hand :-)
Actually Saddam didn't let the inspectors back into Iraq as the terms
were
set.
He let them in.
Squirm all you want, Dubya lied.
Maybe I made a mistake. Maybe the space over your neck isn't empty. It
might be filled with laughing gas.
.
|
|
|
| User: "abracadabra" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush seems impaired; probably drinking again |
17 Jul 2003 02:00:05 PM |
|
|
"John" <nospam@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:nRARa.9232$n95.883687@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
"abracadabra" <abra@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bf609p$8ko$1@slb2.atl.mindspring.net...
"John" <nospam@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:zFpRa.7535$P36.1929010@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
"abracadabra" <abra@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bf4f70$2vq$1@slb6.atl.mindspring.net...
"Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:BFadnQFm-rh3OoiiU-KYuQ@comcast.com...
"Cold Eyes" <sassy@talkback.com> wrote in message
news:bf48m2$dbp$0@pita.alt.net...
What could cause President Bush to so totally lose his grip on
reality
that
he spouts obvious falsehoods about Saddam not allowing UN
inspectors
in
as
the reason for the war?
You mean the same reasons Scott Ritter said in 1998 to Bill
Clinton
when
he
told Bill Clinton that Saddam Hussein was NOT complying with
removal
of
weapons?
Actually Dubya said that Saddam wouldn't let inspectors back into
Iraq.
He lied, and it's about the stupidest lie a person can imagine,
stupider
then the claim about the Niger uranium.
Sorry you got confused, I know that thinking and conservatism don't
go
hand
in hand :-)
Actually Saddam didn't let the inspectors back into Iraq as the terms
were
set.
He let them in.
Squirm all you want, Dubya lied.
Maybe I made a mistake. Maybe the space over your neck isn't empty. It
might be filled with laughing gas.
Dubya still lied. Keep running away from the fact that Dubya lied, but he
did, and he's caught, and he's squirming like a trapped slug.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush seems impaired; probably drinking again |
17 Jul 2003 04:39:53 PM |
|
|
"abracadabra" <abra@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bf6rr7$i6s$1@slb5.atl.mindspring.net...
"John" <nospam@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:nRARa.9232$n95.883687@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
"abracadabra" <abra@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bf609p$8ko$1@slb2.atl.mindspring.net...
"John" <nospam@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:zFpRa.7535$P36.1929010@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
"abracadabra" <abra@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bf4f70$2vq$1@slb6.atl.mindspring.net...
"Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:BFadnQFm-rh3OoiiU-KYuQ@comcast.com...
"Cold Eyes" <sassy@talkback.com> wrote in message
news:bf48m2$dbp$0@pita.alt.net...
What could cause President Bush to so totally lose his grip on
reality
that
he spouts obvious falsehoods about Saddam not allowing UN
inspectors
in
as
the reason for the war?
You mean the same reasons Scott Ritter said in 1998 to Bill
Clinton
when
he
told Bill Clinton that Saddam Hussein was NOT complying with
removal
of
weapons?
Actually Dubya said that Saddam wouldn't let inspectors back into
Iraq.
He lied, and it's about the stupidest lie a person can imagine,
stupider
then the claim about the Niger uranium.
Sorry you got confused, I know that thinking and conservatism
don't
go
hand
in hand :-)
Actually Saddam didn't let the inspectors back into Iraq as the
terms
were
set.
He let them in.
Squirm all you want, Dubya lied.
Maybe I made a mistake. Maybe the space over your neck isn't empty. It
might be filled with laughing gas.
Dubya still lied. Keep running away from the fact that Dubya lied, but he
did, and he's caught, and he's squirming like a trapped slug.
"The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought
significant quantities of uranium from Africa"
Is this the lie that you are referring to? Is this the lie that everyone is
talking about? My first question should be, is this a lie. You can't prove
it is and you can't prove it isn't but you call it a lie. The fact is that
Saddam has tried to make the bomb since the 80s and it is not unreasonable
to believe that he recently tried to obtain uranium from Africa. Blair
believed this to be the case based on intelligents reports and stands by it.
This information has been passed to the US government and that is what the
16 words are saying. The only reason it should not have been included in
the State of the Union Address is because the US government could not
independently substantiate it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush seems impaired; probably drinking again |
17 Jul 2003 06:21:24 PM |
|
|
"abracadabra" <abra@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bf75ov$he2$1@slb6.atl.mindspring.net...
"John" <nospam@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:JIERa.17892$n95.1497168@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
"abracadabra" <abra@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bf6rr7$i6s$1@slb5.atl.mindspring.net...
"John" <nospam@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:nRARa.9232$n95.883687@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
"abracadabra" <abra@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bf609p$8ko$1@slb2.atl.mindspring.net...
"John" <nospam@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:zFpRa.7535$P36.1929010@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
"abracadabra" <abra@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bf4f70$2vq$1@slb6.atl.mindspring.net...
"Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:BFadnQFm-rh3OoiiU-KYuQ@comcast.com...
"Cold Eyes" <sassy@talkback.com> wrote in message
news:bf48m2$dbp$0@pita.alt.net...
What could cause President Bush to so totally lose his
grip
on
reality
that
he spouts obvious falsehoods about Saddam not allowing UN
inspectors
in
as
the reason for the war?
You mean the same reasons Scott Ritter said in 1998 to Bill
Clinton
when
he
told Bill Clinton that Saddam Hussein was NOT complying with
removal
of
weapons?
Actually Dubya said that Saddam wouldn't let inspectors back
into
Iraq.
He lied, and it's about the stupidest lie a person can
imagine,
stupider
then the claim about the Niger uranium.
Sorry you got confused, I know that thinking and conservatism
don't
go
hand
in hand :-)
Actually Saddam didn't let the inspectors back into Iraq as the
terms
were
set.
He let them in.
Squirm all you want, Dubya lied.
Maybe I made a mistake. Maybe the space over your neck isn't empty.
It
might be filled with laughing gas.
Dubya still lied. Keep running away from the fact that Dubya lied, but
he
did, and he's caught, and he's squirming like a trapped slug.
"The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought
significant quantities of uranium from Africa"
Is this the lie that you are referring to?
We knew the information was bad. We knew it was a fraud.
Passing off a knwon fraud as the truth is a lie, even if somebody else
says
it might be true.
What you are calling a fraud is only part of the information, there is more
than those fraudulent papers.
Is this the lie that everyone is
talking about?
Dubya's been lying like a spoiled child since before he was elected.
BTW, what about Dubya's claim that Saddam didn't let inspectors in, when
he
clearly did?
LOL
He didn't. If I gave you a million dollars but you couldn't use it, did I
actually give you a million dollars?
.
|
|
|
| User: "abracadabra" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush seems impaired; probably drinking again |
20 Jul 2003 11:22:16 AM |
|
|
"John" <nospam@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:UbGRa.19672$n95.1760155@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
We knew the information was bad. We knew it was a fraud.
Passing off a knwon fraud as the truth is a lie, even if somebody else
says
it might be true.
What you are calling a fraud is only part of the information, there is
more
than those fraudulent papers.
Yeah, theres other phoney claims by the Administration as well.
But there is certainily no proof to support Dubya's claims about "attacks
withen 45 minutes" and "mushroom clouds over NYC".
Is this the lie that everyone is
talking about?
Dubya's been lying like a spoiled child since before he was elected.
BTW, what about Dubya's claim that Saddam didn't let inspectors in, when
he
clearly did?
LOL
He didn't.
Saddam did let in inspectors.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gogarty" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush seems impaired; probably drinking again |
17 Jul 2003 06:18:59 AM |
|
|
In article <zFpRa.7535$P36.1929010@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>,
says...
set and Bush has the balls to show the world that the USA is not going to
screw around with a person like Saddam when American lives are on the line.
NO American lives were on the line until Bush put them in harm's way.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush seems impaired; probably drinking again |
17 Jul 2003 12:47:14 PM |
|
|
"Gogarty" <gogarty@dublin.edu> wrote in message
news:QpmdneDB3IC_G4uiXTWJhw@bway.net...
In article <zFpRa.7535$P36.1929010@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>,
nospam@yahoo.com
says...
set and Bush has the balls to show the world that the USA is not going to
screw around with a person like Saddam when American lives are on the
line.
NO American lives were on the line until Bush put them in harm's way.
You are looking at such a small piece of the picture, Gogarty. Try to
expand your view. I am assuming that you are a liberal (forgive me if I'm
wrong) and you just don't like Bush. If you remove any bias you may have
and look at the facts, you will see that removing Saddam is a very good move
in many ways. The US didn't do this by itself but, it should have had the
over whelming support of the world.
In my personal opinion, G. W. Bush had the attempted assassination of his
father, G. H. W. Bush that started the ball rolling and if this was the only
reason for the US to remove Saddam, I would agree with you but, it wasn't.
It may have been started because of a personal vendetta but without the many
other reasons, I don't think it would have gotten passed the idea stage.
Taking Saddam out was the right thing to do.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jack A. Lopes" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush seems impaired; probably drinking again |
16 Jul 2003 03:23:34 PM |
|
|
In article <BFadnQFm-rh3OoiiU-KYuQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedstoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Cold Eyes" <sassy@talkback.com> wrote in message
news:bf48m2$dbp$0@pita.alt.net...
What could cause President Bush to so totally lose his grip on reality
that
he spouts obvious falsehoods about Saddam not allowing UN inspectors in as
the reason for the war?
You mean the same reasons Scott Ritter said in 1998 to Bill Clinton when he
told Bill Clinton that Saddam Hussein was NOT complying with removal of
weapons?
Um, it is 2003. UN Inspectors were in Iraq up until a few weeks before
the war, if I recall. The "What about Clinton?" defense simply misses
the mark here, and actually calls attention to how Clinton was pretty
"by the book" regarding things like Iraq. You really don't intend to
point out his superiority to Bush in this regard do you?
Seems that he's probably drinking again, heavily by
the looks of it. The public burping and belching is one sign of this.
Dropping unconscious after choking on a pretzel is another. But the sure
signs of his drinking are his slurred speech, memory loss and inability to
hold a coherent conversation. This man needs help. God help us all.
You liberals are so stupid
Whatever you say, Perfesser.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "dmtsymphony" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush seems impaired; probably drinking again |
16 Jul 2003 02:48:27 PM |
|
|
Osprey wrote:
"Cold Eyes" <sassy@talkback.com> wrote in message
news:bf48m2$dbp$0@pita.alt.net...
What could cause President Bush to so totally lose his grip on reality
that
he spouts obvious falsehoods about Saddam not allowing UN inspectors in as
the reason for the war?
You mean the same reasons Scott Ritter said in 1998 to Bill Clinton when he
told Bill Clinton that Saddam Hussein was NOT complying with removal of
weapons?
Seems that he's probably drinking again, heavily by
the looks of it. The public burping and belching is one sign of this.
Dropping unconscious after choking on a pretzel is another. But the sure
signs of his drinking are his slurred speech, memory loss and inability to
hold a coherent conversation. This man needs help. God help us all.
You liberals are so stupid
You Bush supporters are a dying breed.
Watch the numbers, chump.
Even a moderately stupid person gets fed up being lied to at the expense of
peoples lives.
Only total idiots continue to give support to the murderer in chief.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush seems impaired; probably drinking again |
16 Jul 2003 11:15:58 PM |
|
|
"dmtsymphony" <dmtsymphony@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:3F15AC7A.BB720B52@shaw.ca...
Osprey wrote:
"Cold Eyes" <sassy@talkback.com> wrote in message
news:bf48m2$dbp$0@pita.alt.net...
What could cause President Bush to so totally lose his grip on reality
that
he spouts obvious falsehoods about Saddam not allowing UN inspectors
in as
the reason for the war?
You mean the same reasons Scott Ritter said in 1998 to Bill Clinton when
he
told Bill Clinton that Saddam Hussein was NOT complying with removal of
weapons?
Seems that he's probably drinking again, heavily by
the looks of it. The public burping and belching is one sign of this.
Dropping unconscious after choking on a pretzel is another. But the
sure
signs of his drinking are his slurred speech, memory loss and
inability to
hold a coherent conversation. This man needs help. God help us all.
You liberals are so stupid
You Bush supporters are a dying breed.
Watch the numbers, chump.
Even a moderately stupid person gets fed up being lied to at the expense
of
peoples lives.
Only total idiots continue to give support to the murderer in chief.
If you had a clue, it would get lost in that empty space over your neck.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "brad" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush seems impaired; probably drinking again |
16 Jul 2003 02:46:30 PM |
|
|
"Cold Eyes" <sassy@talkback.com> wrote in message
news:bf48m2$dbp$0@pita.alt.net...
What could cause President Bush to so totally lose his grip on reality
that
he spouts obvious falsehoods about Saddam not allowing UN inspectors in as
the reason for the war? Seems that he's probably drinking again, heavily
by
the looks of it. The public burping and belching is one sign of this.
Dropping unconscious after choking on a pretzel is another. But the sure
signs of his drinking are his slurred speech, memory loss and inability to
hold a coherent conversation. This man needs help. God help us all.
You seem to have forgotten that Saddam only allowed inspectors back in AFTER
the ball was set in motion for using military force. Either you forgot
that, or thought we had. On second thought maybe you're drinking again.
It's like me taking the police on a 90 mile chase before pulling over, and
then arguing against evasion charges by saying that I pulled over.
brad
.
|
|
|
| User: "John" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush seems impaired; probably drinking again |
16 Jul 2003 11:37:13 PM |
|
|
"Cold Eyes" <sassy@talkback.com> wrote in message
news:bf4brt$j0e$0@pita.alt.net...
"brad" <btenney@charter.net> wrote in message
news:vhbarptjd93tfd@corp.supernews.com...
"Cold Eyes" <sassy@talkback.com> wrote in message
news:bf48m2$dbp$0@pita.alt.net...
What could cause President Bush to so totally lose his grip on reality
that
he spouts obvious falsehoods about Saddam not allowing UN inspectors
in
as
the reason for the war? Seems that he's probably drinking again,
heavily
by
the looks of it. The public burping and belching is one sign of this.
Dropping unconscious after choking on a pretzel is another. But the
sure
signs of his drinking are his slurred speech, memory loss and
inability
to
hold a coherent conversation. This man needs help. God help us all.
You seem to have forgotten that Saddam only allowed inspectors back in
AFTER
the ball was set in motion for using military force. Either you forgot
that, or thought we had. On second thought maybe you're drinking again.
It's like me taking the police on a 90 mile chase before pulling over,
and
then arguing against evasion charges by saying that I pulled over.
brad
Okay, I'll play.
In your 90 mile chase analogy, the police didn't shoot you because you
gave
them a chase. They shot you because they said you had a gun that you were
about to use on them.
I'll connect the dots for you:
Bush never claimed before the war that were going in because Saddam
wouldn't
let UN inspectors in, because the UN inspectors were already in Iraq. He
said the war was because Saddam had WMD and posed an imminent threat to
our
nation's security.
It seems that you are a few dots short of a set. Saddam did not comply with
the terms as the United States set them, if he had, we wouldn't have had to
kick his *****.
.
|
|
|
| User: "dmtsymphony" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush seems impaired; probably drinking again |
17 Jul 2003 12:11:41 AM |
|
|
John wrote:
"Cold Eyes" <sassy@talkback.com> wrote in message
news:bf4brt$j0e$0@pita.alt.net...
"brad" <btenney@charter.net> wrote in message
news:vhbarptjd93tfd@corp.supernews.com...
"Cold Eyes" <sassy@talkback.com> wrote in message
news:bf48m2$dbp$0@pita.alt.net...
What could cause President Bush to so totally lose his grip on reality
that
he spouts obvious falsehoods about Saddam not allowing UN inspectors
in
as
the reason for the war? Seems that he's probably drinking again,
heavily
by
the looks of it. The public burping and belching is one sign of this.
Dropping unconscious after choking on a pretzel is another. But the
sure
signs of his drinking are his slurred speech, memory loss and
inability
to
hold a coherent conversation. This man needs help. God help us all.
You seem to have forgotten that Saddam only allowed inspectors back in
AFTER
the ball was set in motion for using military force. Either you forgot
that, or thought we had. On second thought maybe you're drinking again.
It's like me taking the police on a 90 mile chase before pulling over,
and
then arguing against evasion charges by saying that I pulled over.
brad
Okay, I'll play.
In your 90 mile chase analogy, the police didn't shoot you because you
gave
them a chase. They shot you because they said you had a gun that you were
about to use on them.
I'll connect the dots for you:
Bush never claimed before the war that were going in because Saddam
wouldn't
let UN inspectors in, because the UN inspectors were already in Iraq. He
said the war was because Saddam had WMD and posed an imminent threat to
our
nation's security.
It seems that you are a few dots short of a set. Saddam did not comply with
the terms as the United States set them, if he had, we wouldn't have had to
kick his *****.
You didn't kick his *****. You probably did ***** all besides watch war tv.
And your army is busy getting its ***** kicked and demoralized straight into the
shitter. Nice job.
Go back to your Faux News, *****.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "brad" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush seems impaired; probably drinking again |
16 Jul 2003 03:49:33 PM |
|
|
"JC Martin" <jcmartin@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:4CiRa.2366$dk4.119162@typhoon.sonic.net...
"brad" <btenney@charter.net> wrote in message
news:vhbarptjd93tfd@corp.supernews.com...
"Cold Eyes" <sassy@talkback.com> wrote in message
news:bf48m2$dbp$0@pita.alt.net...
What could cause President Bush to so totally lose his grip on reality
that
he spouts obvious falsehoods about Saddam not allowing UN inspectors
in
as
the reason for the war? Seems that he's probably drinking again,
heavily
by
the looks of it. The public burping and belching is one sign of this.
Dropping unconscious after choking on a pretzel is another. But the
sure
signs of his drinking are his slurred speech, memory loss and
inability
to
hold a coherent conversation. This man needs help. God help us all.
You seem to have forgotten that Saddam only allowed inspectors back in
AFTER
the ball was set in motion for using military force. Either you forgot
that, or thought we had. On second thought maybe you're drinking again.
It's like me taking the police on a 90 mile chase before pulling over,
and
then arguing against evasion charges by saying that I pulled over.
But he did let them in, and Han Blix said they were mostly cooperating.
If
we stuck with the U.N., these questions would have never arisen. As for
Bush's statement, he completely screwed up and his own people admitted as
much.
So then you agree that saying his blocking of inspectors was one of the
things that lead to the decision of war would be accurate. I mean you just
conceded that the inspectors were only let in after Bush delivered his
address to the UN.
So why do you insist something you just admitted as true is a lie?
brad
.
|
|
|
| User: "JC Martin" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush seems impaired; probably drinking again |
16 Jul 2003 04:56:35 PM |
|
|
"brad" <btenney@charter.net> wrote in message
news:vhbei1o1nuls16@corp.supernews.com...
"JC Martin" <jcmartin@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:4CiRa.2366$dk4.119162@typhoon.sonic.net...
"brad" <btenney@charter.net> wrote in message
news:vhbarptjd93tfd@corp.supernews.com...
"Cold Eyes" <sassy@talkback.com> wrote in message
news:bf48m2$dbp$0@pita.alt.net...
What could cause President Bush to so totally lose his grip on
reality
that
he spouts obvious falsehoods about Saddam not allowing UN inspectors
in
as
the reason for the war? Seems that he's probably drinking again,
heavily
by
the looks of it. The public burping and belching is one sign of
this.
Dropping unconscious after choking on a pretzel is another. But the
sure
signs of his drinking are his slurred speech, memory loss and
inability
to
hold a coherent conversation. This man needs help. God help us all.
You seem to have forgotten that Saddam only allowed inspectors back in
AFTER
the ball was set in motion for using military force. Either you
forgot
that, or thought we had. On second thought maybe you're drinking
again.
It's like me taking the police on a 90 mile chase before pulling over,
and
then arguing against evasion charges by saying that I pulled over.
But he did let them in, and Han Blix said they were mostly cooperating.
If
we stuck with the U.N., these questions would have never arisen. As for
Bush's statement, he completely screwed up and his own people admitted
as
much.
So then you agree that saying his blocking of inspectors was one of the
things that lead to the decision of war would be accurate.
Nope. The war would have been accurate had we gotten agreement from the
U.N. I don't want our country going it alone as a world cop. Problem with
you Repubs, is that you're brainwashed into believing that Deocrats are
pacifist when in fact the majority of us are not.
I mean you just
conceded that the inspectors were only let in after Bush delivered his
address to the UN.
Did I say that? Actually, I believe Iraq agreed to that situation long
before. The U.S. however was inisting that it be under certain
circumstances.
So why do you insist something you just admitted as true is a lie?
You're spinning and off-point. Why am I not surprised?
-JC
.
|
|
|
| User: "John" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush seems impaired; probably drinking again |
16 Jul 2003 11:48:44 PM |
|
|
"JC Martin" <jcmartin@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:nSjRa.2382$dk4.119615@typhoon.sonic.net...
"brad" <btenney@charter.net> wrote in message
news:vhbei1o1nuls16@corp.supernews.com...
"JC Martin" <jcmartin@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:4CiRa.2366$dk4.119162@typhoon.sonic.net...
"brad" <btenney@charter.net> wrote in message
news:vhbarptjd93tfd@corp.supernews.com...
"Cold Eyes" <sassy@talkback.com> wrote in message
news:bf48m2$dbp$0@pita.alt.net...
What could cause President Bush to so totally lose his grip on
reality
that
he spouts obvious falsehoods about Saddam not allowing UN
inspectors
in
as
the reason for the war? Seems that he's probably drinking again,
heavily
by
the looks of it. The public burping and belching is one sign of
this.
Dropping unconscious after choking on a pretzel is another. But
the
sure
signs of his drinking are his slurred speech, memory loss and
inability
to
hold a coherent conversation. This man needs help. God help us
all.
You seem to have forgotten that Saddam only allowed inspectors back
in
AFTER
the ball was set in motion for using military force. Either you
forgot
that, or thought we had. On second thought maybe you're drinking
again.
It's like me taking the police on a 90 mile chase before pulling
over,
and
then arguing against evasion charges by saying that I pulled over.
But he did let them in, and Han Blix said they were mostly
cooperating.
If
we stuck with the U.N., these questions would have never arisen. As
for
Bush's statement, he completely screwed up and his own people admitted
as
much.
So then you agree that saying his blocking of inspectors was one of the
things that lead to the decision of war would be accurate.
Nope. The war would have been accurate had we gotten agreement from the
U.N. I don't want our country going it alone as a world cop. Problem
with
you Repubs, is that you're brainwashed into believing that Deocrats are
pacifist when in fact the majority of us are not.
I mean you just
conceded that the inspectors were only let in after Bush delivered his
address to the UN.
Did I say that? Actually, I believe Iraq agreed to that situation long
before. The U.S. however was inisting that it be under certain
circumstances.
Yes, you are right. The US insisted that the inspectors would have
unrestricted inspections. Saddam would allow the inspectors in the country
but would stop them from looking where the weapons were. This is what he
did from 91 - 98 and all that time, the world let him play his games while
he promoted terrorism and killed his own people.
So why do you insist something you just admitted as true is a lie?
You're spinning and off-point. Why am I not surprised?
-JC
.
|
|
|
| User: "brad" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush seems impaired; probably drinking again |
17 Jul 2003 12:06:46 PM |
|
|
"Gene" <Yahoo@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:Xns93BB7E6E0429FDoDahDoDah@216.168.3.44...
sstevelp@aol.com (Steve) wrote in
Check out where their kids are - most of them have high paying jobs as
government appointees. Nepotism is now a normal determinant for a
government job with this administration. Heres' just a few.
Elizabeth Cheney, the daughter of the US Vice President ***** Cheney, US
Department of State
Micheal Powell, The son of Secratary of State Powell, FCC Commission
chairman.
Janet Rehnquist - daughter of the chief justice. Resigned(fired) HHS
That's par for the course for every politician, CEO, or business owner out
there, regardless of political slant.
brad
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gene" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush seems impaired; probably drinking again |
17 Jul 2003 12:57:20 PM |
|
|
"brad" <btenney@charter.net> wrote in
news:vhdls8j1nnk87d@corp.supernews.com:
"Gene" <Yahoo@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:Xns93BB7E6E0429FDoDahDoDah@216.168.3.44...
sstevelp@aol.com (Steve) wrote in
Check out where their kids are - most of them have high paying jobs
as government appointees. Nepotism is now a normal determinant for a
government job with this administration. Heres' just a few.
Elizabeth Cheney, the daughter of the US Vice President ***** Cheney,
US Department of State
Micheal Powell, The son of Secratary of State Powell, FCC Commission
chairman.
Janet Rehnquist - daughter of the chief justice. Resigned(fired) HHS
That's par for the course for every politician, CEO, or business owner
out there, regardless of political slant.
brad
True, very true. It is everywhere.
.
|
|
|
| User: "rbbomber" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush seems impaired; probably drinking again |
17 Jul 2003 04:17:02 PM |
|
|
Gene <Yahoo@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:<Xns93BB8F06888FADoDahDoDah@216.168.3.44>...
"brad" <btenney@charter.net> wrote in
news:vhdls8j1nnk87d@corp.supernews.com:
"Gene" <Yahoo@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:Xns93BB7E6E0429FDoDahDoDah@216.168.3.44...
sstevelp@aol.com (Steve) wrote in
Check out where their kids are - most of them have high paying jobs
as government appointees. Nepotism is now a normal determinant for a
government job with this administration. Heres' just a few.
Elizabeth Cheney, the daughter of the US Vice President ***** Cheney,
US Department of State
Micheal Powell, The son of Secratary of State Powell, FCC Commission
chairman.
Janet Rehnquist - daughter of the chief justice. Resigned(fired) HHS
That's par for the course for every politician, CEO, or business owner
out there, regardless of political slant.
brad
True, very true. It is everywhere.
Yes, that's what happens when the country is run like a business.
.
|
|
|
| User: "brad" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush seems impaired; probably drinking again |
17 Jul 2003 05:16:26 PM |
|
|
No. That's just what happens. It happens in every country in the world.
Always has and always will.
brad
"rbbomber" <rbbomber@netzero.com> wrote in message
news:7e483417.0307171317.43cb9b8d@posting.google.com...
Gene <Yahoo@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:<Xns93BB8F06888FADoDahDoDah@216.168.3.44>...
"brad" <btenney@charter.net> wrote in
news:vhdls8j1nnk87d@corp.supernews.com:
"Gene" <Yahoo@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:Xns93BB7E6E0429FDoDahDoDah@216.168.3.44...
sstevelp@aol.com (Steve) wrote in
Check out where their kids are - most of them have high paying jobs
as government appointees. Nepotism is now a normal determinant for a
government job with this administration. Heres' just a few.
Elizabeth Cheney, the daughter of the US Vice President ***** Cheney,
US Department of State
Micheal Powell, The son of Secratary of State Powell, FCC Commission
chairman.
Janet Rehnquist - daughter of the chief justice. Resigned(fired) HHS
That's par for the course for every politician, CEO, or business owner
out there, regardless of political slant.
brad
True, very true. It is everywhere.
Yes, that's what happens when the country is run like a business.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "John" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush seems impaired; probably drinking again |
17 Jul 2003 01:08:39 PM |
|
|
"Steve" <sstevelp@aol.com> wrote in message
news:224b4a15.0307170459.31ea33e6@posting.google.com...
"John" <nospam@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:<MUpRa.7687$P36.1969772@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>...
"JC Martin" <jcmartin@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:nSjRa.2382$dk4.119615@typhoon.sonic.net...
"brad" <btenney@charter.net> wrote in message
news:vhbei1o1nuls16@corp.supernews.com...
"JC Martin" <jcmartin@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:4CiRa.2366$dk4.119162@typhoon.sonic.net...
"brad" <btenney@charter.net> wrote in message
news:vhbarptjd93tfd@corp.supernews.com...
"Cold Eyes" <sassy@talkback.com> wrote in message
news:bf48m2$dbp$0@pita.alt.net...
What could cause President Bush to so totally lose his grip on
reality
that
he spouts obvious falsehoods about Saddam not allowing UN
inspectors
in
as
the reason for the war? Seems that he's probably drinking
again,
heavily
by
the looks of it. The public burping and belching is one sign
of
this.
Dropping unconscious after choking on a pretzel is another.
But
the
sure
signs of his drinking are his slurred speech, memory loss and
inability
to
hold a coherent conversation. This man needs help. God help us
all.
You seem to have forgotten that Saddam only allowed inspectors
back
in
AFTER
the ball was set in motion for using military force. Either you
forgot
that, or thought we had. On second thought maybe you're
drinking
again.
It's like me taking the police on a 90 mile chase before pulling
over,
and
then arguing against evasion charges by saying that I pulled
over.
But he did let them in, and Han Blix said they were mostly
cooperating.
If
we stuck with the U.N., these questions would have never arisen.
As
for
Bush's statement, he completely screwed up and his own people
admitted
as
much.
So then you agree that saying his blocking of inspectors was one of
the
things that lead to the decision of war would be accurate.
Nope. The war would have been accurate had we gotten agreement from
the
U.N. I don't want our country going it alone as a world cop. Problem
with
you Repubs, is that you're brainwashed into believing that Deocrats
are
pacifist when in fact the majority of us are not.
I mean you just
conceded that the inspectors were only let in after Bush delivered
his
address to the UN.
Did I say that? Actually, I believe Iraq agreed to that situation
long
before. The U.S. however was inisting that it be under certain
circumstances.
Yes, you are right. The US insisted that the inspectors would have
unrestricted inspections. Saddam would allow the inspectors in the
country
but would stop them from looking where the weapons were. This is what
he
did from 91 - 98 and all that time, the world let him play his games
while
he promoted terrorism and killed his own people.
snip
What weapons ?
Also the US had no authority to insist on anything. This was a matter
for the UN. The UN insisted on full cooperation with the weapons
inspectors
and this is what they were getting.
snip
No they weren't full cooperation. If they had, the world would have had no
reason to go in.
Stevel
.
|
|
|
| User: "rbbomber" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush seems impaired; probably drinking again |
17 Jul 2003 04:18:22 PM |
|
|
"John" <nospam@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<HCBRa.11035$n95.992566@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>...
"Steve" <sstevelp@aol.com> wrote in message
news:224b4a15.0307170459.31ea33e6@posting.google.com...
"John" <nospam@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:<MUpRa.7687$P36.1969772@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>...
"JC Martin" <jcmartin@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:nSjRa.2382$dk4.119615@typhoon.sonic.net...
"brad" <btenney@charter.net> wrote in message
news:vhbei1o1nuls16@corp.supernews.com...
"JC Martin" <jcmartin@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:4CiRa.2366$dk4.119162@typhoon.sonic.net...
"brad" <btenney@charter.net> wrote in message
news:vhbarptjd93tfd@corp.supernews.com...
"Cold Eyes" <sassy@talkback.com> wrote in message
news:bf48m2$dbp$0@pita.alt.net...
What could cause President Bush to so totally lose his grip on
reality
that
he spouts obvious falsehoods about Saddam not allowing UN
inspectors
in
as
the reason for the war? Seems that he's probably drinking
again,
heavily
by
the looks of it. The public burping and belching is one sign
of
this.
Dropping unconscious after choking on a pretzel is another.
But
the
sure
signs of his drinking are his slurred speech, memory loss and
inability
to
hold a coherent conversation. This man needs help. God help us
all.
You seem to have forgotten that Saddam only allowed inspectors
back
in
AFTER
the ball was set in motion for using military force. Either you
forgot
that, or thought we had. On second thought maybe you're
drinking
again.
It's like me taking the police on a 90 mile chase before pulling
over,
and
then arguing against evasion charges by saying that I pulled
over.
But he did let them in, and Han Blix said they were mostly
cooperating.
If
we stuck with the U.N., these questions would have never arisen.
As
for
Bush's statement, he completely screwed up and his own people
admitted
as
much.
So then you agree that saying his blocking of inspectors was one of
the
things that lead to the decision of war would be accurate.
Nope. The war would have been accurate had we gotten agreement from
the
U.N. I don't want our country going it alone as a world cop. Problem
with
you Repubs, is that you're brainwashed into believing that Deocrats
are
pacifist when in fact the majority of us are not.
I mean you just
conceded that the inspectors were only let in after Bush delivered
his
address to the UN.
Did I say that? Actually, I believe Iraq agreed to that situation
long
before. The U.S. however was inisting that it be under certain
circumstances.
Yes, you are right. The US insisted that the inspectors would have
unrestricted inspections. Saddam would allow the inspectors in the
country
but would stop them from looking where the weapons were. This is what
he
did from 91 - 98 and all that time, the world let him play his games
while
he promoted terrorism and killed his own people.
snip
What weapons ?
Also the US had no authority to insist on anything. This was a matter
for the UN. The UN insisted on full cooperation with the weapons
inspectors
and this is what they were getting.
snip
No they weren't full cooperation. If they had, the world would have had no
reason to go in.
The _world_ didn't and didn't.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
