| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Krusty" |
| Date: |
23 Dec 2004 01:37:42 PM |
| Object: |
Bush to Renominate Judges Blocked by Democrats |
Open real wide, Dimmys. This time you're gonna get it shoved down you
throats. BWAHAHAHA!!
http://tinyurl.com/5gm8e
.
|
|
| User: "BeeSki deletedonrequest" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush to Renominate Judges Blocked by Democrats |
23 Dec 2004 03:14:40 PM |
|
|
Cool. By then the approval rating for Idiot Bush will be around the mid
40s. It will be FUN watching Idiot Bush make a further fool of himself (not
an easy task BTW).
"Krusty" <Krusty@KissMyAss.fool> wrote in message
news:d5Fyd.2680$5y3.2245@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
Open real wide, Dimmys. This time you're gonna get it shoved down you
throats. BWAHAHAHA!!
http://tinyurl.com/5gm8e
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krusty" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush to Renominate Judges Blocked by Democrats |
23 Dec 2004 04:13:55 PM |
|
|
Approval ratings? Ho hum. Bush is a lame duck president. He's not nearly as
concerned this time around whether he's popular or not. Now he's free to
take care of some of the wet work. One part of which will be appointing
conservative judges to federal positions and the Supreme Court. And these
guys and gals will be around a looonng time.
And you ***** libbydim parasites are going to start running out of liberal,
activist judges to run sniveling to when things get your pink panties in a
wad.
The second American revolution is beginning. And the AIDS riddled, dope
huffing, government cheese deadbeats in this country ain't gonna like one
little bit. :)
"BeeSki" <deletedonrequest> wrote in message
news:10smda3k6dn2cc7@corp.supernews.com...
Cool. By then the approval rating for Idiot Bush will be around the mid
40s. It will be FUN watching Idiot Bush make a further fool of himself
(not
an easy task BTW).
"Krusty" <Krusty@KissMyAss.fool> wrote in message
news:d5Fyd.2680$5y3.2245@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
Open real wide, Dimmys. This time you're gonna get it shoved down you
throats. BWAHAHAHA!!
http://tinyurl.com/5gm8e
.
|
|
|
| User: "BeeSki deletedonrequest" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush to Renominate Judges Blocked by Democrats |
23 Dec 2004 09:05:20 PM |
|
|
"Krusty" <Krusty@KissMyAss.fool> wrote in message
news:GnHyd.2725$5y3.575@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
Approval ratings? Ho hum. Bush is a lame duck president. He's not nearly
as
concerned this time around whether he's popular or not. Now he's free to
take care of some of the wet work. One part of which will be appointing
conservative judges to federal positions and the Supreme Court. And these
guys and gals will be around a looonng time.
And you ***** libbydim parasites are going to start running out of
liberal,
activist judges to run sniveling to when things get your pink panties in a
wad.
The second American revolution is beginning. And the AIDS riddled, dope
huffing, government cheese deadbeats in this country ain't gonna like one
little bit. :)
The insane war of Idiot Bush will drag Idiot Bush into the gutter he so
richly deserves and will virtually paralyze any "political capital" Idiot
Bush professes to have.
Not concerned whether he's popular??? Surely you're not that mentally
challenged... (oops, sorry. Forgot I was addressing the Idiot Krust
himself!)
You are one frighteningly ignorant, angry, paranoid dude who obviously has
nightmares about flesh eating liberals nightly.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush to Renominate Judges Blocked by Democrats |
24 Dec 2004 10:26:44 AM |
|
|
"BeeSki" <deletedonrequest> wrote in message news:
You are one frighteningly ignorant, angry, paranoid dude who obviously has
nightmares about flesh eating liberals nightly.
Actually, that would be tax sucking, welfare spending , defense gutting, fag
marrying,
liberals.
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "BeeSki deletedonrequest" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush to Renominate Judges Blocked by Democrats |
24 Dec 2004 01:44:29 PM |
|
|
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:332ua6F3qi93tU1@individual.net...
"BeeSki" <deletedonrequest> wrote in message news:
You are one frighteningly ignorant, angry, paranoid dude who obviously
has
nightmares about flesh eating liberals nightly.
Actually, that would be tax sucking, welfare spending , defense gutting,
fag
marrying,
liberals.
Jim E
Jim E.
Wha'... ??
I have no idea what you're talking about. Please provide an in depth
explanation of what you're trying to say here. (????)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush to Renominate Judges Blocked by Democrats |
24 Dec 2004 06:15:41 PM |
|
|
"BeeSki" <deletedonrequest> wrote in message
news:10sosd02knof3c1@corp.supernews.com...
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:332ua6F3qi93tU1@individual.net...
"BeeSki" <deletedonrequest> wrote in message news:
You are one frighteningly ignorant, angry, paranoid dude who obviously
has
nightmares about flesh eating liberals nightly.
Actually, that would be tax sucking, welfare spending , defense gutting,
fag
marrying,
liberals.
Jim E
Jim E.
Wha'... ??
I have no idea what you're talking about. Please provide an in depth
explanation of what you're trying to say here. (????)
Having no idea is what got you losers where you are, out of influence.
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "BeeSki deletedonrequest" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush to Renominate Judges Blocked by Democrats |
24 Dec 2004 10:02:18 PM |
|
|
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:333ppfF3r5objU1@individual.net...
"BeeSki" <deletedonrequest> wrote in message
news:10sosd02knof3c1@corp.supernews.com...
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:332ua6F3qi93tU1@individual.net...
"BeeSki" <deletedonrequest> wrote in message news:
You are one frighteningly ignorant, angry, paranoid dude who
obviously
has
nightmares about flesh eating liberals nightly.
Actually, that would be tax sucking, welfare spending , defense
gutting,
fag
marrying,
liberals.
Jim E
Jim E.
Wha'... ??
I have no idea what you're talking about. Please provide an in depth
explanation of what you're trying to say here. (????)
Having no idea is what got you losers where you are, out of influence.
re. "you losers". (???) Please clarify.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush to Renominate Judges Blocked by Democrats |
25 Dec 2004 08:41:13 AM |
|
|
"BeeSki" <deletedonrequest> wrote in message
news:10sppiej7hfjv80@corp.supernews.com...
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:333ppfF3r5objU1@individual.net...
"BeeSki" <deletedonrequest> wrote in message
news:10sosd02knof3c1@corp.supernews.com...
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:332ua6F3qi93tU1@individual.net...
"BeeSki" <deletedonrequest> wrote in message news:
You are one frighteningly ignorant, angry, paranoid dude who
obviously
has
nightmares about flesh eating liberals nightly.
Actually, that would be tax sucking, welfare spending , defense
gutting,
fag
marrying,
liberals.
Jim E
Jim E.
Wha'... ??
I have no idea what you're talking about. Please provide an in depth
explanation of what you're trying to say here. (????)
Having no idea is what got you losers where you are, out of influence.
re. "you losers". (???) Please clarify.
Again with the no idea problem
Those of the liberal persuasion.
You seem to lack the common (that being meager) level of intuitive
reasoning.
.
|
|
|
| User: "BeeSki deletedonrequest" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush to Renominate Judges Blocked by Democrats |
25 Dec 2004 10:34:16 AM |
|
|
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:335cgaF3t613nU1@individual.net...
"BeeSki" <deletedonrequest> wrote in message
news:10sppiej7hfjv80@corp.supernews.com...
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:333ppfF3r5objU1@individual.net...
"BeeSki" <deletedonrequest> wrote in message
news:10sosd02knof3c1@corp.supernews.com...
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:332ua6F3qi93tU1@individual.net...
"BeeSki" <deletedonrequest> wrote in message news:
You are one frighteningly ignorant, angry, paranoid dude who
obviously
has
nightmares about flesh eating liberals nightly.
Actually, that would be tax sucking, welfare spending , defense
gutting,
fag
marrying,
liberals.
Jim E
Jim E.
Wha'... ??
I have no idea what you're talking about. Please provide an in depth
explanation of what you're trying to say here. (????)
Having no idea is what got you losers where you are, out of influence.
re. "you losers". (???) Please clarify.
Again with the no idea problem
Those of the liberal persuasion.
You seem to lack the common (that being meager) level of intuitive
reasoning.
re. "intuitive reasoning". Akin to the intuitive reasoning you're so clearly
NOT demonstrated in virtually _every_ post you're made here???
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush to Renominate Judges Blocked by Democrats |
26 Dec 2004 01:27:39 AM |
|
|
"BeeSki" <deletedonrequest> wrote in message
news:10sr5kc8o6cl7af@corp.supernews.com...
re. "intuitive reasoning". Akin to the intuitive reasoning you're so
clearly
NOT demonstrated in virtually _every_ post you're made here???
Care to re word that so it makes sense ??
.
|
|
|
| User: "BeeSki deletedonrequest" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush to Renominate Judges Blocked by Democrats |
26 Dec 2004 12:34:50 PM |
|
|
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:3377fcF3qr2crU1@individual.net...
"BeeSki" <deletedonrequest> wrote in message
news:10sr5kc8o6cl7af@corp.supernews.com...
re. "intuitive reasoning". Akin to the intuitive reasoning you're so
clearly
NOT demonstrated in virtually _every_ post you're made here???
Care to re word that so it makes sense ??
IOW, dumb down the language to a level you can comprehend??
Nah-- 'fraid not. I'd prefer you apply yourself a bit more. Read slowly--
concentrate. And most of all-- don't be afraid or embarrassed to seek
assistance!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush to Renominate Judges Blocked by Democrats |
26 Dec 2004 06:59:56 PM |
|
|
"BeeSki" <deletedonrequest> wrote in message
news:10su12denb74k75@corp.supernews.com...
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:3377fcF3qr2crU1@individual.net...
"BeeSki" <deletedonrequest> wrote in message
news:10sr5kc8o6cl7af@corp.supernews.com...
re. "intuitive reasoning". Akin to the intuitive reasoning you're so
clearly
NOT demonstrated in virtually _every_ post you're made here???
Care to re word that so it makes sense ??
IOW, dumb down the language to a level you can comprehend??
Nah-- 'fraid not. I'd prefer you apply yourself a bit more. Read slowly--
concentrate. And most of all-- don't be afraid or embarrassed to seek
assistance!
Was only offering an opportunity to clean up that glaring example of syntax
death spiral, never mind. English not your native tongue ?
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "BeeSki deletedonrequest" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush to Renominate Judges Blocked by Democrats |
27 Dec 2004 09:38:11 AM |
|
|
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:33954cF3tramfU1@individual.net...
"BeeSki" <deletedonrequest> wrote in message
news:10su12denb74k75@corp.supernews.com...
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:3377fcF3qr2crU1@individual.net...
"BeeSki" <deletedonrequest> wrote in message
news:10sr5kc8o6cl7af@corp.supernews.com...
re. "intuitive reasoning". Akin to the intuitive reasoning you're so
clearly
NOT demonstrated in virtually _every_ post you're made here???
Care to re word that so it makes sense ??
IOW, dumb down the language to a level you can comprehend??
Nah-- 'fraid not. I'd prefer you apply yourself a bit more. Read
slowly--
concentrate. And most of all-- don't be afraid or embarrassed to seek
assistance!
Was only offering an opportunity to clean up that glaring example of
syntax
death spiral, never mind. English not your native tongue ?
Jim-- re. "syntax death spiral". ouch-- good one! Well, not really "good" in
that it makes any sense or represents coherent thought, but a fantastic
effort on your part!
You obviously took my advice and either took it upon yourself to do some
studying, or asked for the assistance I had suggested. Very, very good.
Ok, now the next step will be to not only put together a few of those cool
words, but to create some sentences that actually make sense and apply to
the topic at hand.
I'm very encouraged by your development here and anxiously await news of
your progress! I'm *so* proud of you!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush to Renominate Judges Blocked by Democrats |
27 Dec 2004 10:13:56 AM |
|
|
"BeeSki" <deletedonrequest> wrote in message
news:10t0b388r79lje0@corp.supernews.com...
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:33954cF3tramfU1@individual.net...
"BeeSki" <deletedonrequest> wrote in message
news:10su12denb74k75@corp.supernews.com...
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:3377fcF3qr2crU1@individual.net...
"BeeSki" <deletedonrequest> wrote in message
news:10sr5kc8o6cl7af@corp.supernews.com...
re. "intuitive reasoning". Akin to the intuitive reasoning you're so
clearly
NOT demonstrated in virtually _every_ post you're made here???
Care to re word that so it makes sense ??
IOW, dumb down the language to a level you can comprehend??
Nah-- 'fraid not. I'd prefer you apply yourself a bit more. Read
slowly--
concentrate. And most of all-- don't be afraid or embarrassed to seek
assistance!
Was only offering an opportunity to clean up that glaring example of
syntax
death spiral, never mind. English not your native tongue ?
Jim-- re. "syntax death spiral". ouch-- good one! Well, not really "good"
in
that it makes any sense or represents coherent thought, but a fantastic
effort on your part!
You obviously took my advice and either took it upon yourself to do some
studying, or asked for the assistance I had suggested. Very, very good.
Ok, now the next step will be to not only put together a few of those cool
words, but to create some sentences that actually make sense and apply to
the topic at hand.
I'm very encouraged by your development here and anxiously await news of
your progress! I'm *so* proud of you!!
You are way too easily entertained.
Simplicity seems to be your by word.
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "BeeSki deletedonrequest" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush to Renominate Judges Blocked by Democrats |
27 Dec 2004 03:17:31 PM |
|
|
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:33aqm3F3vdvg6U1@individual.net...
"BeeSki" <deletedonrequest> wrote in message
news:10t0b388r79lje0@corp.supernews.com...
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:33954cF3tramfU1@individual.net...
"BeeSki" <deletedonrequest> wrote in message
news:10su12denb74k75@corp.supernews.com...
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:3377fcF3qr2crU1@individual.net...
"BeeSki" <deletedonrequest> wrote in message
news:10sr5kc8o6cl7af@corp.supernews.com...
re. "intuitive reasoning". Akin to the intuitive reasoning you're
so
clearly
NOT demonstrated in virtually _every_ post you're made here???
Care to re word that so it makes sense ??
IOW, dumb down the language to a level you can comprehend??
Nah-- 'fraid not. I'd prefer you apply yourself a bit more. Read
slowly--
concentrate. And most of all-- don't be afraid or embarrassed to seek
assistance!
Was only offering an opportunity to clean up that glaring example of
syntax
death spiral, never mind. English not your native tongue ?
Jim-- re. "syntax death spiral". ouch-- good one! Well, not really
"good"
in
that it makes any sense or represents coherent thought, but a fantastic
effort on your part!
You obviously took my advice and either took it upon yourself to do some
studying, or asked for the assistance I had suggested. Very, very good.
Ok, now the next step will be to not only put together a few of those
cool
words, but to create some sentences that actually make sense and apply
to
the topic at hand.
I'm very encouraged by your development here and anxiously await news of
your progress! I'm *so* proud of you!!
You are way too easily entertained.
Simplicity seems to be your by word.
oops... ! Darn... and you were doing SO good... :-(
Can you spot the error in: >>Simplicity seems to be your by word<< ??
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Krusty" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush to Renominate Judges Blocked by Democrats |
23 Dec 2004 09:23:05 PM |
|
|
Ho hum.
"BeeSki" <deletedonrequest> wrote in message
news:10sn1ri2o0g1c76@corp.supernews.com...
"Krusty" <Krusty@KissMyAss.fool> wrote in message
news:GnHyd.2725$5y3.575@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
Approval ratings? Ho hum. Bush is a lame duck president. He's not nearly
as
concerned this time around whether he's popular or not. Now he's free to
take care of some of the wet work. One part of which will be appointing
conservative judges to federal positions and the Supreme Court. And these
guys and gals will be around a looonng time.
And you ***** libbydim parasites are going to start running out of
liberal,
activist judges to run sniveling to when things get your pink panties in
a
wad.
The second American revolution is beginning. And the AIDS riddled, dope
huffing, government cheese deadbeats in this country ain't gonna like one
little bit. :)
The insane war of Idiot Bush will drag Idiot Bush into the gutter he so
richly deserves and will virtually paralyze any "political capital" Idiot
Bush professes to have.
Not concerned whether he's popular??? Surely you're not that mentally
challenged... (oops, sorry. Forgot I was addressing the Idiot Krust
himself!)
You are one frighteningly ignorant, angry, paranoid dude who obviously has
nightmares about flesh eating liberals nightly.
.
|
|
|
| User: "BeeSki deletedonrequest" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush to Renominate Judges Blocked by Democrats |
23 Dec 2004 10:58:10 PM |
|
|
"Krusty" <Krusty@KissMyAss.fool> wrote in message
news:kVLyd.2812$5y3.1654@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
Ho hum.
Wow.
"BeeSki" <deletedonrequest> wrote in message
news:10sn1ri2o0g1c76@corp.supernews.com...
"Krusty" <Krusty@KissMyAss.fool> wrote in message
news:GnHyd.2725$5y3.575@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
Approval ratings? Ho hum. Bush is a lame duck president. He's not
nearly
as
concerned this time around whether he's popular or not. Now he's free
to
take care of some of the wet work. One part of which will be appointing
conservative judges to federal positions and the Supreme Court. And
these
guys and gals will be around a looonng time.
And you ***** libbydim parasites are going to start running out of
liberal,
activist judges to run sniveling to when things get your pink panties
in
a
wad.
The second American revolution is beginning. And the AIDS riddled, dope
huffing, government cheese deadbeats in this country ain't gonna like
one
little bit. :)
The insane war of Idiot Bush will drag Idiot Bush into the gutter he so
richly deserves and will virtually paralyze any "political capital"
Idiot
Bush professes to have.
Not concerned whether he's popular??? Surely you're not that mentally
challenged... (oops, sorry. Forgot I was addressing the Idiot Krust
himself!)
You are one frighteningly ignorant, angry, paranoid dude who obviously
has
nightmares about flesh eating liberals nightly.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Clay" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush to Renominate Judges Blocked by Democrats |
25 Dec 2004 10:55:37 AM |
|
|
Hear Hear !!!
What a comeback... makes it worthwhile to have logged on this morning.
Damn, Krusty, you kick some major *****. I especially like the terms
"***** libbydim parasites" and "government cheese deadbeats". Not
only are they funny as all get-out... they're also true.
Keep up the good work.
-C-
Krusty wrote:
Approval ratings? Ho hum. Bush is a lame duck president. He's not
nearly as
concerned this time around whether he's popular or not. Now he's free
to
take care of some of the wet work. One part of which will be
appointing
conservative judges to federal positions and the Supreme Court. And
these
guys and gals will be around a looonng time.
And you ***** libbydim parasites are going to start running out of
liberal,
activist judges to run sniveling to when things get your pink panties
in a
wad.
The second American revolution is beginning. And the AIDS riddled,
dope
huffing, government cheese deadbeats in this country ain't gonna like
one
little bit. :)
"BeeSki" <deletedonrequest> wrote in message
news:10smda3k6dn2cc7@corp.supernews.com...
Cool. By then the approval rating for Idiot Bush will be around
the mid
40s. It will be FUN watching Idiot Bush make a further fool of
himself
(not
an easy task BTW).
"Krusty" <Krusty@KissMyAss.fool> wrote in message
news:d5Fyd.2680$5y3.2245@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
Open real wide, Dimmys. This time you're gonna get it shoved down
you
throats. BWAHAHAHA!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krusty" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush to Renominate Judges Blocked by Democrats |
25 Dec 2004 04:45:26 PM |
|
|
Thanks, Clay. A tip 'o the Krust hat to ya!
It's fun dicking with the wacko libs, ain't it? One of my favorite parts is,
knowing what atrophied senses of humor these overwrought, twitching dweebs
have, it's easy to sail a zinger right over their heads. And think of their
eye bugging out behind their coke-bottle glasses and the veins popping on
their little pink, skinny necks.
I know, I know. That's not very sporting is it? But I also like to go to
landfill and shoot rats.
"Clay" <clayonline@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1103993737.141762.148600@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Hear Hear !!!
What a comeback... makes it worthwhile to have logged on this morning.
Damn, Krusty, you kick some major *****. I especially like the terms
"***** libbydim parasites" and "government cheese deadbeats". Not
only are they funny as all get-out... they're also true.
Keep up the good work.
-C-
Krusty wrote:
Approval ratings? Ho hum. Bush is a lame duck president. He's not
nearly as
concerned this time around whether he's popular or not. Now he's free
to
take care of some of the wet work. One part of which will be
appointing
conservative judges to federal positions and the Supreme Court. And
these
guys and gals will be around a looonng time.
And you ***** libbydim parasites are going to start running out of
liberal,
activist judges to run sniveling to when things get your pink panties
in a
wad.
The second American revolution is beginning. And the AIDS riddled,
dope
huffing, government cheese deadbeats in this country ain't gonna like
one
little bit. :)
"BeeSki" <deletedonrequest> wrote in message
news:10smda3k6dn2cc7@corp.supernews.com...
Cool. By then the approval rating for Idiot Bush will be around
the mid
40s. It will be FUN watching Idiot Bush make a further fool of
himself
(not
an easy task BTW).
"Krusty" <Krusty@KissMyAss.fool> wrote in message
news:d5Fyd.2680$5y3.2245@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
Open real wide, Dimmys. This time you're gonna get it shoved down
you
throats. BWAHAHAHA!!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Krusty" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush to Renominate Judges Blocked by Democrats |
25 Dec 2004 04:44:44 PM |
|
|
Thanks, Clay. A tip 'o the Krust hat to ya!
It's fun dicking with the wacko libs, ain't it? One of my favorite parts is,
knowing what atrophied senses of humor these overwrought, twitching dweebs
have, it's easy to sail a zinger right over their heads. And think of their
eye bugging out behind their coke-bottle glasses and the veins popping on
their little pink, skinny necks.
I know, I know. That's not very sporting is it? But I also like to go to
landfill and shoot rats.
"Clay" <clayonline@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1103993737.141762.148600@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Hear Hear !!!
What a comeback... makes it worthwhile to have logged on this morning.
Damn, Krusty, you kick some major *****. I especially like the terms
"***** libbydim parasites" and "government cheese deadbeats". Not
only are they funny as all get-out... they're also true.
Keep up the good work.
-C-
Krusty wrote:
Approval ratings? Ho hum. Bush is a lame duck president. He's not
nearly as
concerned this time around whether he's popular or not. Now he's free
to
take care of some of the wet work. One part of which will be
appointing
conservative judges to federal positions and the Supreme Court. And
these
guys and gals will be around a looonng time.
And you ***** libbydim parasites are going to start running out of
liberal,
activist judges to run sniveling to when things get your pink panties
in a
wad.
The second American revolution is beginning. And the AIDS riddled,
dope
huffing, government cheese deadbeats in this country ain't gonna like
one
little bit. :)
"BeeSki" <deletedonrequest> wrote in message
news:10smda3k6dn2cc7@corp.supernews.com...
Cool. By then the approval rating for Idiot Bush will be around
the mid
40s. It will be FUN watching Idiot Bush make a further fool of
himself
(not
an easy task BTW).
"Krusty" <Krusty@KissMyAss.fool> wrote in message
news:d5Fyd.2680$5y3.2245@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
Open real wide, Dimmys. This time you're gonna get it shoved down
you
throats. BWAHAHAHA!!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "KStahl" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush to Renominate Judges Blocked by Democrats |
23 Dec 2004 04:27:36 PM |
|
|
Krusty wrote:
Open real wide, Dimmys. This time you're gonna get it shoved down you
throats. BWAHAHAHA!!
http://tinyurl.com/5gm8e
All it means is that he opens himself up to being punished in other
ways. He may be his judges, but when this type of thing is pulled it
becomes open season to find out all of the illegal things that theses
guys did in the past so that they can be forced to resign in disgrace.
Personally I think it should even be expanded to include finding
scandals in the lives of anyone in the immediate family and close
associates and I have no qualms about running stings against them to
purposely make them look bad.
I'm actually still waiting the for first nude photos of the twins to
show up on the internet and video would be even better. If Bush is going
to fight dirty then the opposition can fight dirty as well. It isn't
necessary to be the party in power to wield a bit of power.
--
Do not ask for whom the bell tolls.............
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mindless Drewling Libruls" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush to Renominate Judges Blocked by Democrats |
23 Dec 2004 07:05:14 PM |
|
|
"KStahl" <ktsahl@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:UIqdnT6dlPYs21bcRVn-ow@comcast.com...
Krusty wrote:
Open real wide, Dimmys. This time you're gonna get it shoved down you
throats. BWAHAHAHA!!
http://tinyurl.com/5gm8e
All it means is that he opens himself up to being punished in other ways.
He may be his judges, but when this type of thing is pulled it becomes
open season to find out all of the illegal things that theses guys did in
the past so that they can be forced to resign in disgrace. Personally I
think it should even be expanded to include finding scandals in the lives
of anyone in the immediate family and close associates and I have no
qualms about running stings against them to purposely make them look bad.
I'm actually still waiting the for first nude photos of the twins to show
up on the internet and video would be even better. If Bush is going to
fight dirty then the opposition can fight dirty as well. It isn't
necessary to be the party in power to wield a bit of power.
In what way is it "fighting dirty" for the President to nominate people to
fill federal court vacancies, as the Constitution specifies, Mr. Democrat?
.
|
|
|
| User: "KStahl" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush to Renominate Judges Blocked by Democrats |
23 Dec 2004 09:23:37 PM |
|
|
Mindless Drewling Libruls wrote:
"KStahl" <ktsahl@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:UIqdnT6dlPYs21bcRVn-ow@comcast.com...
Krusty wrote:
Open real wide, Dimmys. This time you're gonna get it shoved down you
throats. BWAHAHAHA!!
http://tinyurl.com/5gm8e
All it means is that he opens himself up to being punished in other ways.
He may be his judges, but when this type of thing is pulled it becomes
open season to find out all of the illegal things that theses guys did in
the past so that they can be forced to resign in disgrace. Personally I
think it should even be expanded to include finding scandals in the lives
of anyone in the immediate family and close associates and I have no
qualms about running stings against them to purposely make them look bad.
I'm actually still waiting the for first nude photos of the twins to show
up on the internet and video would be even better. If Bush is going to
fight dirty then the opposition can fight dirty as well. It isn't
necessary to be the party in power to wield a bit of power.
In what way is it "fighting dirty" for the President to nominate people to
fill federal court vacancies, as the Constitution specifies, Mr. Democrat?
He is trying to make appointments when Congress isn't in session and
thereby bypass the confirmation process.
--
Do not ask for whom the bell tolls.............
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krusty" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush to Renominate Judges Blocked by Democrats |
23 Dec 2004 09:29:29 PM |
|
|
Uhhh.., It's called you libbydim trash getting your asses kicked. Rock 'n
ROLL GW!! We got the librul filth on the run.
"KStahl" <ktsahl@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:7eadnfLBYsyXEVbcRVn-1A@comcast.com...
Mindless Drewling Libruls wrote:
"KStahl" <ktsahl@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:UIqdnT6dlPYs21bcRVn-ow@comcast.com...
Krusty wrote:
Open real wide, Dimmys. This time you're gonna get it shoved down you
throats. BWAHAHAHA!!
http://tinyurl.com/5gm8e
All it means is that he opens himself up to being punished in other ways.
He may be his judges, but when this type of thing is pulled it becomes
open season to find out all of the illegal things that theses guys did in
the past so that they can be forced to resign in disgrace. Personally I
think it should even be expanded to include finding scandals in the lives
of anyone in the immediate family and close associates and I have no
qualms about running stings against them to purposely make them look bad.
I'm actually still waiting the for first nude photos of the twins to show
up on the internet and video would be even better. If Bush is going to
fight dirty then the opposition can fight dirty as well. It isn't
necessary to be the party in power to wield a bit of power.
In what way is it "fighting dirty" for the President to nominate people
to fill federal court vacancies, as the Constitution specifies, Mr.
Democrat?
He is trying to make appointments when Congress isn't in session and
thereby bypass the confirmation process.
--
Do not ask for whom the bell tolls.............
.
|
|
|
| User: "KStahl" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush to Renominate Judges Blocked by Democrats |
23 Dec 2004 09:35:21 PM |
|
|
Krusty wrote:
Uhhh.., It's called you libbydim trash getting your asses kicked. Rock 'n
ROLL GW!! We got the librul filth on the run.
The tide will turn some day. It always does. And when conservatives are
on the outside again their asses will get kicked even harder. The
conservative movement cannot last forever and the longer it lasts the
sooner this nation will cease to exist as the United States of America.
Every country that has ever had an extended conservative movement has
fallen in some way. History has shown this very consistently. It might
even be argued that conservatives are purposely trying to bring about
the downfall of the country since they know that conservatism does not
build nations - it destroys them.
--
Do not ask for whom the bell tolls.............
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush to Renominate Judges Blocked by Democrats |
23 Dec 2004 09:53:13 PM |
|
|
"KStahl" <ktsahl@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:EJqdnX8bpoxWE1bcRVn-gQ@comcast.com...
Krusty wrote:
Uhhh.., It's called you libbydim trash getting your asses kicked. Rock 'n
ROLL GW!! We got the librul filth on the run.
The tide will turn some day. It always does. And when conservatives are on the
outside again their asses will get kicked even harder. The conservative
movement cannot last forever and the longer it lasts the sooner this nation
will cease to exist as the United States of America. Every country that has
ever had an extended conservative movement has fallen in some way. History has
shown this very consistently. It might even be argued that conservatives are
purposely trying to bring about the downfall of the country since they know
that conservatism does not build nations - it destroys them.
What countries have fallen because
of conservative governments?
.
|
|
|
| User: "KStahl" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush to Renominate Judges Blocked by Democrats |
23 Dec 2004 11:32:46 PM |
|
|
Bob wrote:
"KStahl" <ktsahl@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:EJqdnX8bpoxWE1bcRVn-gQ@comcast.com...
Krusty wrote:
Uhhh.., It's called you libbydim trash getting your asses kicked. Rock 'n
ROLL GW!! We got the librul filth on the run.
The tide will turn some day. It always does. And when conservatives are on the
outside again their asses will get kicked even harder. The conservative
movement cannot last forever and the longer it lasts the sooner this nation
will cease to exist as the United States of America. Every country that has
ever had an extended conservative movement has fallen in some way. History has
shown this very consistently. It might even be argued that conservatives are
purposely trying to bring about the downfall of the country since they know
that conservatism does not build nations - it destroys them.
What countries have fallen because
of conservative governments?
Ancient Greece - After a retreat to conservatism the Greek empire
collapsed. Greece now controls just a fraction of what was once the
Greek empire.
Ancient Rome - After a retreat to conservatism the Roman empire
collapsed. The Roman empire used to control most of Europe and much of
the middle east.
Germany - circa 1945. The conservative government of Hitler collapsed
and the country was divided and it wasn't until almost 50 years later
that the country was reunited to something that approximated its borders
prior to the Third Reich.
Italy - circa 1944. The collapse of the facist government and loss of
Italian colonies.
England - circa 1955 - Loss of colonies and declining influence. Great
Britain survives as as mere fraction of what it once was. The current
country is much more liberal then it was prior to the collapse of the
empire.
China (1874)
Spain - circa 1976. With death of conservative Franco, Spain became a
vastly liberal nation.
Confederate (treasonous) southern states - circa 1865. The south was
overwhelmingly conservative and were soundly beaten by the liberal north.
Albania - circa late 20th century - After years of xenophobic
conservative rule, the old leaders died out and Albania is now becoming
a progress/liberal nation.
Romania - same as Albania.
Beyond that - Conservatism has never, ever resulted in great intellect.
Virtually all great intellects were left of center. Why do you think
that academia is predominantly liberal? Conservatives have no use for
intellect for they believe that dogma is sufficient for all purposes.
Nations grow because they are progressive and have a vision for the
future. Conservatives ONLY want to defend and hold onto the past.
Nations that do not progress eventually fall behind the rest of the
world and become expendable to the rest of the world. In many ways our
country's lapse into conservatism is a good indication that the Arab
world has eked a back-handed victory over the U.S. Arab countries are
overwhelmingly conservative and they fully intend to extend their
conservative control over the world. Apart from christianity vs islam as
a religious, they are bending our country to the same type of religious
morality that they impose on their own people. Rather then fighting back
against their control we have merely given and accepted their version of
morality and they get to laugh up their sleeve because they know that
the deeper the U.S. delves into conservatism they more we will become
afraid of the the Arab world. It doesn't have to happen tomorrow, next
week, next month or next year. They have been patient for a long time
and they can afford to work very slowly.
--
Do not ask for whom the bell tolls.............
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ken" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush to Renominate Judges Blocked by Democrats |
24 Dec 2004 05:21:08 AM |
|
|
"KStahl" <ktsahl@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:WMednWTrnMXSN1bcRVn-rQ@comcast.com...
Bob wrote:
"KStahl" <ktsahl@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:EJqdnX8bpoxWE1bcRVn-gQ@comcast.com...
Krusty wrote:
Uhhh.., It's called you libbydim trash getting your asses kicked. Rock
'n ROLL GW!! We got the librul filth on the run.
The tide will turn some day. It always does. And when conservatives are
on the outside again their asses will get kicked even harder. The
conservative movement cannot last forever and the longer it lasts the
sooner this nation will cease to exist as the United States of America.
Every country that has ever had an extended conservative movement has
fallen in some way. History has shown this very consistently. It might
even be argued that conservatives are purposely trying to bring about the
downfall of the country since they know that conservatism does not build
nations - it destroys them.
What countries have fallen because
of conservative governments?
Ancient Greece - After a retreat to conservatism the Greek empire
collapsed. Greece now controls just a fraction of what was once the Greek
empire.
Nonsense. Greece broke up mainly due to infighting between the Athenians
(more or less libertarian) and Spartans (authoritative), along with much of
the population following Alexander the Great out of Greece. This was not a
left-right issue.
Ancient Rome - After a retreat to conservatism the Roman empire collapsed.
The Roman empire used to control most of Europe and much of the middle
east.
Nonsense. At no point was the Roman Empire, or the Roman Republic before it,
ever anything other than authoritarian to the masses and imperialistic. It
fell because of incompetent and curel leadership. Again, not a left-right
issue.
Germany - circa 1945. The conservative government of Hitler collapsed and
the country was divided and it wasn't until almost 50 years later that the
country was reunited to something that approximated its borders prior to
the Third Reich.
Hardly conservative politically. Hitler was a little bit corporatist and a
little bit socialist in his treatment of business. He was an authoritative
imperialist and a tyrant, but his appeal was because his politics were
extremist on the right and and the left, balancing out somewhere near the
middle on the opposite side of centrism (i.e. the equal and exact opposite
of a centrist is an extremist, both with power over both the left and right,
but neither can be labeled properly as left or right).
Pat Buchanan would be a fine example of a modern day Hitler (without the
power, of course), with appeal from both the left extremes and the right.
Italy - circa 1944. The collapse of the facist government and loss of
Italian colonies.
Maybe to the right because of his social beliefs, but his economic
philosophy within Italy was not.
England - circa 1955 - Loss of colonies and declining influence. Great
Britain survives as as mere fraction of what it once was. The current
country is much more liberal then it was prior to the collapse of the
empire.
A disinterest in imperialism after Hitler's conquests had more to do with
this than anything. Engalnd and Europe have always been a swinging pendulum,
seeing the evil of one direction and heading towards its exact opposite. One
of the great things about America is its stability, not going from one evil
to another to escape the last one. Europe will swing back towards conquest
again eventually, there's too much of a trend for it not to.
China (1874)
I fail to see your point here.
Spain - circa 1976. With death of conservative Franco, Spain became a
vastly liberal nation.
Another example of the pendulum effect. It will change again, and when it
does, are you going to call it a left-wing failure?
Confederate (treasonous) southern states - circa 1865. The south was
overwhelmingly conservative and were soundly beaten by the liberal north.
A war that should have been avoided if the north had any sense. Our
government is currently giving money to tobacco growers whose entire family
fortunes, going back centuries, is in jeopardy due to the government's own
harsh restrictions on their sector of the market. Similarly, why couldn't
the northern politicians been as willing to understand the economic
devestation that would come from pulling labor force out from underneath the
agrarian South and given federal aid to the farmers were going to lose
everything without slavery (and they did. ever heard the term
"sharecropper?" Go look it up or read Faulkner if you don't what I'm talking
about). You can't expect everything to be hunky dorry after the economic
system (set up originally with the north's blessings, BTW) is ripped out
from under a region. You can pay off people to do away with a system, you
can wean them off slowly over a period of decades, but you cannot rip to
economic fabric out from under a people and not expect war.
While the South was more conservative, this was more of a common sense issue
that the north failed to see than a left-right dicotomy.
Albania - circa late 20th century - After years of xenophobic conservative
rule,
Excuse me? Did you say "conservative" rule? Far from it. Albania was ruled
by communists economically and was forced to abandon the religion of its
mass majority (Islam) and become athestic. Hardly conservative by any
standard. Albania may be similar to a democracy now in some respects
(certainly not in most), but the pendulum swung back hard toward Islamic
fundamentaism in some areas. Al Queda is pretty popular there, and they
aided the Albanians in the Kosovo War (didn't Clinton side with the ones Al
Queda was helping in that conflict? yes he did. Hmm!).
the old leaders died out and Albania is now becoming
a progress/liberal nation.
Not really. It's sort of a theocracy, though not totally. If you ever went
there, you would not recognize anything even remotely resembling the left's
precious "separation of church and state." It's a little better than under
communism, but not much.
Romania - same as Albania.
Same nonsense.
[Similar simple-minded stereotyping of all conservatives snipped.]
Have a nice day,
Ken
.
|
|
|
| User: "NoSpamAllowed NoSpamAllowed" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush to Renominate Judges Blocked by Democrats |
24 Dec 2004 10:05:07 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 05:21:08 -0600, "Ken" <Leftists@Useful_Idiot_Savants.com>
wrote:
"KStahl" <ktsahl@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:WMednWTrnMXSN1bcRVn-rQ@comcast.com...
Bob wrote:
"KStahl" <ktsahl@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:EJqdnX8bpoxWE1bcRVn-gQ@comcast.com...
Krusty wrote:
Uhhh.., It's called you libbydim trash getting your asses kicked. Rock
'n ROLL GW!! We got the librul filth on the run.
The tide will turn some day. It always does. And when conservatives are
on the outside again their asses will get kicked even harder. The
conservative movement cannot last forever and the longer it lasts the
sooner this nation will cease to exist as the United States of America.
Every country that has ever had an extended conservative movement has
fallen in some way. History has shown this very consistently. It might
even be argued that conservatives are purposely trying to bring about the
downfall of the country since they know that conservatism does not build
nations - it destroys them.
What countries have fallen because
of conservative governments?
Ancient Greece - After a retreat to conservatism the Greek empire
collapsed. Greece now controls just a fraction of what was once the Greek
empire.
Nonsense. Greece broke up mainly due to infighting between the Athenians
(more or less libertarian) and Spartans (authoritative), along with much of
the population following Alexander the Great out of Greece. This was not a
left-right issue.
The Spartans and Athenians fought over and over for control of the country. The
Spartans were neo-cons in a sense that makes Rumsfeld pull out his shriveled
pecker and wish he could still masturbate. The Athenians--hell bent on
democracy and literature and the arts--were the most progressive thinking
people ever.
The fact both cultures felt homosexuality was totally proper does not make them
liberal, by the way, as there are a lot of closet homosexuals in the Republican
party.
Ancient Rome - After a retreat to conservatism the Roman empire collapsed.
The Roman empire used to control most of Europe and much of the middle
east.
Nonsense. At no point was the Roman Empire, or the Roman Republic before it,
ever anything other than authoritarian to the masses and imperialistic. It
fell because of incompetent and curel leadership. Again, not a left-right
issue.
Not true. Close, but not true. The original Roman Republic had a history of
colonizing the world--and conquered people were brought into the Empire as full
citizens with a say in government, and progress granted to them as benefits of
being members of Rome. While the method to ahchieve this was war, once the war
was over the conquered people became full members of the Roman (budding
empire). Eventually, as Rome's thirst for wealth and slaves grew, yet the
people grew more and more complacent, it needed to all be imported (sound
familiar?). Eventually, this thirst led to wars for the sheer purpose of
tribute and acquiring slaves to bring back to Rome, with the conquered people
becoming becoming little more than thralls. If you view the original Republic
as progressive for its time (it was) and the Empire as bent on wealth and power
at the expense of others (it was) as conservative (Sure sounds like the
Rightards) then the analogy fits.
Germany - circa 1945. The conservative government of Hitler collapsed and
the country was divided and it wasn't until almost 50 years later that the
country was reunited to something that approximated its borders prior to
the Third Reich.
Hardly conservative politically.
How can anyone equate fascism with progressive? It is the exact opposite, and
thus conservative.
Hitler was a little bit corporatist and a
little bit socialist in his treatment of business. He was an authoritative
imperialist and a tyrant, but his appeal was because his politics were
extremist on the right and and the left, balancing out somewhere near the
middle on the opposite side of centrism (i.e. the equal and exact opposite
of a centrist is an extremist, both with power over both the left and right,
but neither can be labeled properly as left or right).
Death to inferiors, forced breeding of pure aryan women--not a platform the
liberals could ever be envisioned adopting. Racial purity--Liberal? Not. Hitler
youth--Progresive? Not. There is nothing Hitler did that was considered
progressive in terms of treatment to people, unless you factor in that being
1/8 German could save a jew from gas chamber.
Centrist and extremist are false measure, as both progressive and conservative
camps have both.
Pat Buchanan would be a fine example of a modern day Hitler (without the
power, of course), with appeal from both the left extremes and the right.
I give you that point.
China (1874)
I fail to see your point here.
The extreme conservatism of China allowed more progressive countries to knuckle
it under--depsite a lack of near the number warriors.
Spain - circa 1976. With death of conservative Franco, Spain became a
vastly liberal nation.
Another example of the pendulum effect. It will change again, and when it
does, are you going to call it a left-wing failure?
Any extreme form of government will fail. Which is why America is in for the
*****-fucking of its existence.
Confederate (treasonous) southern states - circa 1865. The south was
overwhelmingly conservative and were soundly beaten by the liberal north.
A war that should have been avoided if the north had any sense.
When the South broke off, the North had little choice.
Our
government is currently giving money to tobacco growers whose entire family
fortunes, going back centuries, is in jeopardy due to the government's own
harsh restrictions on their sector of the market. Similarly, why couldn't
the northern politicians been as willing to understand the economic
devestation that would come from pulling labor force out from underneath the
agrarian South and given federal aid to the farmers were going to lose
everything without slavery (and they did. ever heard the term
"sharecropper?" Go look it up or read Faulkner if you don't what I'm talking
about). You can't expect everything to be hunky dorry after the economic
system (set up originally with the north's blessings, BTW) is ripped out
from under a region. You can pay off people to do away with a system, you
can wean them off slowly over a period of decades, but you cannot rip to
economic fabric out from under a people and not expect war.
Sadly, human slavery is little better than wars of aggression, and despite the
problems with he solution, it needed to be ended immediately. Look at it this
way--if someone was holding your mother captive, and using her as a slave, both
for labor and sex, how long would you say would be a prudent length of time to
allow her master to adjust to the fact he was going to have to give her up?
YEE-HAW!!!! FOUR MORE YEARS!!!! This is gonna be better than Spike TV!
Surf over to http://fallujapictures.blogspot.com/ for some cool pics
of all the fun!
------------------------------------------------------------------
The undeniable truth of politics is that people always
get the government they deserve, whether it is Saddam
Hussein in Iraq or George W. Bush in the United States.
------------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Krusty" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush to Renominate Judges Blocked by Democrats |
23 Dec 2004 10:07:54 PM |
|
|
Dream on loser. (Hopefully I don't need to go into detail about how you
pathetic Dims have absolutely no political power whatsoever anymore.)
You're angry that you're losers. You're angry that you're held in contempt
by real Americans. You're angry that you don't have a fuckin clue how to
turn your disaster around.
Bottom line? You're losers. You mean nothing. You are the gutter ***** of our
country. That will be addressed in time.
HEEHEHEHE
"KStahl" <ktsahl@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:EJqdnX8bpoxWE1bcRVn-gQ@comcast.com...
Krusty wrote:
Uhhh.., It's called you libbydim trash getting your asses kicked. Rock 'n
ROLL GW!! We got the librul filth on the run.
The tide will turn some day. It always does. And when conservatives are on
the outside again their asses will get kicked even harder. The
conservative movement cannot last forever and the longer it lasts the
sooner this nation will cease to exist as the United States of America.
Every country that has ever had an extended conservative movement has
fallen in some way. History has shown this very consistently. It might
even be argued that conservatives are purposely trying to bring about the
downfall of the country since they know that conservatism does not build
nations - it destroys them.
--
Do not ask for whom the bell tolls.............
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
